Previous thread died so here it is again!As usual, no shitty arguments in the cut vs. uncut debacle. Everyone's tired of it.
>>2938252Jesus.
>>2939949>>2939950>>2939951Fucking disgusting
>>2939985you mean mental illness
>>2939949>>2939950>>2939951>>2939952>>2940087Hey, Anon. Stop using my handle.
>>2940186Oh shit, I thought you liked Patrick Fillion. Thank god.
>>2940190I dislike Patrick Fillion art. That imposter has been using my handle in recent times.
>>2940190It's because you can't register a username in 4chan that a username can be hijacked.
>>2940196>>2940195>>2940186>>2940087>>2939952>>2939951>>2939950>>2939949anon is talking to himself
>>2940235Nah, they seem to be totally different people.
blue coyote is 100% talking to himself, he's just pretending that he doesn't like patrick fillion's art
>>2940379and acting like he's not the anon who has been spamming the board with patrick fillion porn these past couple of months
>>2940379>>2940380So, you're the anon posting Patrick Fillion art using my handle.
>>2940388Different anon, I think there’s 5 or 6 doing that, I’m sorry that they are trying to ruin your reputation on this board.
>>2940489Oh neat, from his patreon I presume? I’m happy to know there’s more to that set.
>>2941240mid
>>2941240Nice pose.
>>2938021Can anybody tell me who draw this? Also do they have Twitter?
>>2943008It's like every NSFW Twitter artist's OC rolled up into one.
>>2939851>>2939949>>2939950>>2940382>>2940490>>2940491>>2940493>>2942277>>2942888>>2942889>>2943008>>2946682>>2951428>>2951431>>2952178>>2952179>>2952180>>2952430>>2952615thread ruined
>>2942853The artist is Jasdavi. Twitter username is the same.
>>2952679Dude, all of tthe rest of the non-Patrick Fillion are not even half bad.
patrickposting is top tier
>>2955590Chocotaur's art is so fucking hot
>>2940489This artist is great at drawing balls in just the perfect position that make it look like the cock is about to explode in the next instant.
>>2948073lol
>>2956278Sauce?
>>2956456It's from some random tumblr, and unfortunately that's not a community that tracks sources for 95% of what they post.
>>2956596come on, this reeeealy looks like CP. Where do we draw the line?
>>2956456@peggy9ty
>>2956651t. hasn't seen an 18 year old in years
>>2956651Please read the rules properly and stop your fucking bitching. Shota as defined by this boards rules is PREPUBESCENT.Prepubescent = basically under the age of 11. It doesn’t say pubescent. It doesn’t say high schoolers. It says prepubescent. Please get a basic education.
>>2956697>>2956737so anything boner-capable is fair game? yeesh. At least I can sleep well knowing none of you creeps will be parents.
>>2956764According to the rules, yes. That aside, what looks like CP to you in that pic? Let's look at OP's pic, the character is a highschooler, but you had no problem with him, why is that?If we compare the two characters what are the differences? The length from shoulder to hip is about the same. The length of the arms seem a bit shorter in OP's pic, but that may be due to the angle. The character is OP's is more muscular. The size of their dicks is about the same. That's all from what we can see. In summary, their bodies are about the same size, with one being more muscular and the other skinnier. By the way, both pics were drawn by the same person, so difference in artstyle is irrelevant.With that in mind, why did one character make you think of CP while the other didn't? I assume it was because in the pic you complained about there is a bigger guy, in other words, you saw a smaller skinnier guy being fucked by a bigger muscular guy and you immediately thought "that's a child/minor", which makes me think the problem is with you for seeing CP everywhere, maybe due to too much exposure to that kind of thing.tl;dr: You're just a faggot bitching for no reason.
>>2956775>tl;dr: it's clearly an adult because men never get muscle definition until they turn 18 ever
>>2956784Face reminds me of the trannies from Thailand
>>2956782I literally compared it to OP's pic which is of a high schooler, a minor with more muscles than the pic you complained about (the character there barely has muscles which is why I said he's skinnier), so I dunno what you're talking about. Again, why is it that OP's pic didn't bother you, but that other one did? Is it the lack of muscles that made you think it's a minor?
>>2956800Again, why are you defending literal CP? "In my defense, Your Honor, that picture of a high school boy was just a drawing."Your next line is "You think drawings have human rights"
>>2956764That’s not what I said? Literal infants are capable of erections. The picture you commented on is so far from a depiction of a child and can barely even be classified as a teenager at all. It honestly looks like your average twink is 20 something converted to cartoon form. If you see a child then that is completely on you if I’m being honest. That dick is an adults, and so is the overall body development etc. Now what I originally said was a point blank argument. Stop with the absurd claims of CP because you’ve chosen to enter an image board that clearly states immediately that shota is prepubescent, so you’re really fucking far from the kinda of images you should be upset about.99% of anime is based on high schoolers and only 1 year of highschool is typically dedicated to 18 year olds. That means that almost every single fanart is “cp”. Yet here we are with an entire MHA thread full of 14 year old characters - and why is it allowed? Right because there is almost 0 physical difference between a 14 year old and an 18 year old in anime due to style and variance of body development.Even if the idea behind it is to jerk off to 14 year old anime characters, at base when you enter this board it is accepted imagery and if you have a problem with it then go elsewhere.
>>2956801I see, you're just baiting. In case you're not, I said none of what you're implying, try reading my posts again, maybe this time you'll understand.
>>2956816No one has time to read your essays about infants are somehow sexual being.>>2956803>Literal infants are capable of erections.Stay as far away from children as possible.
>>2956803>tl:dr: some little boys don't look little at all and infants are sexual beings so it's not creepy for a middle aged coomer to draw underage boys i swear!Now tell us about the age of consent in your favorite country. I know you want to.
>>2956651>>2956697>>2956737>>2956764>>2956775>>2956782>>2956800>>2956801>>2956803>>2956816>>2956818>>2956833Jesus, this place isn't a debate forum. Post porn or leave.
>>2956818>>2956833Please go outside and touch grass
>>2956839Please seek psychological help
>>2956833Jesus Christ your comprehension is terrible. You’re the one talking about erections being the pass for acceptable content. The point of mentioning infants is that by your dumbass logic there’d be literal toddlercon on here. Do you see it? No, you don’t. You are projecting so hard it’s actually sad. We get it you feel guilty jerking off to pictures of underage drawn boys. Now fuck off and bitch elsewhere, which is what I originally told you to do because you clearly have brain damage and also need to go to specsavers.
>>2956857So you never said the following?>>2956803>Literal infants are capable of erections
>>2956862It is a literal factual statement to highlight how ignorant you are to claim that anybody here perpetuated the idea that a male capable of an erection meets the criteria of pubescent+ in order to push your false (and likely projecting) narrative.You don’t seem to have comprehension skills. You don’t have critical thinking skills. You have no observational skills. You can’t even seem to be able to tell the difference between prepubescent and an adult going by the one picture here you called out. Let me reiterate for you.Regardless of you being supremely fucking wrong and a deluded schizophrenic - this board as it’s rules state allow for anything depicting any age group above prepubescent. And firstly again, the reason why is because otherwise only 1% of the content that exists for yaoi would be tolerated on the board. Secondly, in yaoi there is no way you can identify between a pubescent boy and an 18 year old.You are ridiculous and likely the biggest pedophile of everyone here if you can’t seem to see the difference between that picture you commented on and an underage boy. This whole argument has less to do with the fact that as a whole the subject of age in yaoi is mostly arbitrary. It is more of the fact that if you have trouble with that specific picture for being “underage” - then you’re the only person incapable of seeing the difference between a literal adult and a 10 year old. Maybe put your energy to use on an actual problem.
>>2956876>y-you're the real pedophile if you think there's nothing wrong with fictional children being sexualized! after all, age is just a numberI understand it's fiction, but don't you think it's a little creepy to be writing these essays about why pedophilia is ok if it's "just a drawing"?
They are original characters by the artist JasDavihttps://twitter.com/jasdaviand are adults lol. Ya'll need to calm down.
>>2956900>>2956902>>2956903>>2956904>>2956905Beautiful>>2956907Disgusting
>>2956857>>2956876Like >>2956900 said calm down, I'm the other anon that was arguing with him and as I said he's clearly baiting, so don't bother with him anymore just like I didn't.
