How do i achieve this level of colour mastery?
British people will tell you with a straight face this is a good painting
>>7169758i like it desu, it could've been much better without the ultra realistic splotchy skin
>>7169779It is THOUGH.
>>7169779Pyw. You wont
>>7169779and they're right
is this from silent hill?
>>7169758typical satanist bri'ish
>>7169949Satan is a jewish fairytale character
>>7169758this painting is really coolThis dude's reputation is basically some old ghoul who probably eats childrenThe painter took that repution, he draped charles in a vortex of chaos that either looks like hellfire or screaming souls, but he painted his face and hands in a soothing, earthly tone. Charle's demeanor/body language is gentle and the butterfly is such a great detail, as it's unbothered by the madness happening around Charles, like it's not really there, it's just an illusion.This painting goes so far to try and humanize charles, it's pretty genius, it's the single best thing I've ever seen about that guy, it almost convinces me he's a nice person.Also this painting's intensity would probably explode the brain of a victorian peasant and that's also pretty cool to me >>7169949this is why tasteful abstraction in art is so powerful, it allows the human mind to find patterns that aren't really there
>>7169955good analysis, made me appreciate the painting more
>>7169758very normal painting
>>7169758>How do i achieve this level of colour mastery?You don't want to know.Replace -colour- for -EVIL- and you may be into something right there...
>>7169949>something something heil satan>preparing to destroy the child
>>7169955I wasn't big on this painting but you make a good case for it
>>7169758hands could yuse some work, they look like sausage fingers, pose is a little boring and/or asymmetrical or off balance, seems tilted to the right , details a little half assed8/10 for SOVL
>>7171816>hands could yuse some work, they look like sausage fingersthat's what his fingers look like irl
>>7169758>cheats on Princess Di>racist treatment of daughter-in-law>disowns son Harry>dying of cancer>portrait painter paints "Prince Charles in Hell"lol
>>7169758
>>7171822Good artists makes portraits lifelike, but a really great artists makes them even better.
>>7169954Hello rabbi
>>7171848Making the subject more conventionally attractive doesn't make it more artistic, it most cases it just makes him look banal.
Obvious nepotism, Yeo is straight garbage and probably outsourced the face and just shat red on the rest of it>took 3 years to make!LMAOShould have hired a real portrait painter, but then again, any real artist would never work for those aristoghouls.
>>7169949>Be Satan Worshiping Painter>Commissioned to paint royal portrait>Idea!>Paint in very obvious devil>...if the painting is viewed upside down, alongside a flipped symmetrical version, and you squint your eyes a bit>Satan's teachings are now further widespreadI know your not actually saying this is the case, but the amount of people who see subtle shit like your picrel, and assume it must have been intentional is insane.
>>7171866he downplayed the fingers
>>7171866What's going on above the dog's hind legs, and below the girl's hand holding the dog? It looks like it's meant to where the leg starts, but it's horribly wrong, and it doesn't look like the line between the hairy back and the hairless tummy of the dog, so what am I looking at there?
>>7171903it's just the torso of the dog bro, i think the patterned spots are throwing you off
>>7169954>fairytaleYou wish>>7169758It's a basic analogous color scheme. Start by making color studies from it.
>>7171935Oh! You're totally right, I can see it now. I've gotta say though, even now knowing what it is, it looks wrong. I think the spot underneath her hand was a bad choice.
>>7171951>>7171854who invited all the christkikes?
>>7171953It's a portrait, which means the painter needs to keep the likeness of the subject. Changing around their features would change the identity of the subject. The dog is not a prop.
>>7171903you're right, what on earth is this shape? if it's its leg the dog is being held in a very awkward way.>>7171935you think this part is just a fur pattern? i'm not seeing it
>>7171966Yeah, that's also what I see, glad I'm not the only one.However, the anon is right, look underneath her hand, that's a spot - it seems to create a weird illusion where you see that kidney bean shape.>>7171962I get you, but there must have been something better than what they did. If it doesn't look right, it doesn't look right.
>>7171951>You wishI wish he was real, imagine all the christcucks he'd be raping right now in hell
>>7171966
>>7171960>>7172157Not a Christian, nor a Jew, nor a Muslim. Oh, why must ignorance rhyme with arrogance.
>>7171903it’s the fur pattern anon and part of its thigh. The dog is a whippet and they have a very distinct tuck up of their abdomen and a deep chest. I hope this helps you see how it works. >t. owns four whippets currently
>>7172157You'll grow up eventually. Hopefully.
>>7172195Christianity is growing up to become a finely extinct cult.
>>7172201
>>7172203Yes, I need to buy one.
>>7171862retard
>>7169758>quinacridone and alizarinRepulsive
>>7172201probably.that's certain for atheism though, and at an even faster rate. atheists are the bitterest, often meanest, and saddest of all humans; evolution will take care of that, shouldn't it? they live in their tiny bubble, unaware of the world around them.
>>7172201That's assumedly an illustration of blood libel, which is Judaism not Christianity you moron.
>>7172229christianity is judaism-lite. all stem from the same abrahamic nonsense
>>7172231I can tell by the way that you speak about these things that you have almost zero knowledge about theism outside of the most surface level materialist "flying spaghetti monster" reddit takes. I'd bet that the thing you base your personality on resisting bears little to no resemblance to reality.
>>7172228>and at an even faster rateOpposite according to global stats. Atheism is steadily increasing, especially in the most developed countries. Religious people tend to live in filth and poverty.>>7172229Jesus has been under that little knife too.
>>7172244> [atheist] live in their tiny bubble, unaware of the world around them.that is to be understood, in space and in time:>Opposite according to global stats.theism has been ubiquitous since basically forever. the time periods of those "global stats" are still largely insignificant in comparison (50 years vs. 5k, 10k?).>Religious people tend to live in filth and povertytell that to the Vatican, to *all* the kings, emperors and noblemen of old of all civilizations, etc.most atheists would kill themselves or quickly come to believe if they were experiencing harsher living conditions, don't you think? let's not invert the causality.do you think the current trends indicate the world getting less harsh? what is to be concluded then?
>>7172314>b-but we wuz kangzTimes have changed. Keep getting lost in the past while history leaves you behind.The modern Vatican also has nothing to do with faith. We currently have a leftist pope who endorses gay couples.>most atheists would kill themselves or quickly come to believe if they were experiencing harsher living conditions, don't you think?But here >>7172228 you said that they're already bitter and miserable. Clearly atheism can survive in the face of hardship.>do you think the current trends indicate the world getting less harsh?Literacy, education, medicine, technology, food abundance and prosperity are at their historical peak. We're even starting to develop some ecological awareness. Even in the face of current wars I'd say we're living better lives than the people of the dark ages.
>>7169758red
>>7169955>and the butterfly is such a great detailyes the pedo mk ultra monarch butterfly is a great detail indeed. Im sure whole reddit is gasping at how heckin quirky wholesome that painting is.
>>7172364you have /pol/ brainrot. touch grass
>>7172323>Times have changed. Keep getting lost in the past while history leaves you behind.Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. Don't overestimate your erudition: this was taught 2500 years ago, but despite all the "progress" we've made since then, the average man still can't grasp it.I won't comment further. Not everyone is willing to look in-depth in the current state of affairs. Amusingly, that same psychological flaw appears among those shallow religious people.You're one of those who will see his world view shattered by time, mark my words. Hopefully for you, it'll come gradually, and won't be too brutal. And hopefully, it'll humble you.You really are living in a little bubble.
>>7172381updoot!
>>7172381touch grass fr lil bro, your conspiracies... uuuhhh its giving problematic? sksksksfdsks. Log off sis
>>7172364i dont care about your imagined word nigga
>>7169758This has potential, if only the artist managed to blend the head with the rest of the painting. At this point it looks like a floating head. A true master would have noticed that flaw, regardless of the underlying message he was trying to convey. If you're gonna do nasty or controversial at least make it beautiful too.
>>7172477The head was bought from an asset store in China
>>7172790I wanna drag my face against that bush Hmmmmm!!!! imagine the smell anon, smells like rotting paradise hmmmm!!!!
>>7172381Yeah bro! MONARCHY RULES! THERE ISNT NOTHING TO BE SUSPICIOUS ABOUT NEVER!!!!Fucking moron
>>7169758AI generated
>>7169779It is offensively ugly and disgustingly out of place, and in the context of placing it in a hall filled with centuries of portraits of previous monarchs it should get the artist arrested for sedition.But on a technical level, it is legitimately competent. Which I guess is a point in its favor? Much of this awful left wing art is ugly, offensive and poorly made, but this painting is on the other hand a well-crafted insult to common decency. I am reminded of Russian communist art, which was disgusting, often uninspired, and supported a satanic ideology - but which was often drafted by graduates of Russian fine arts academies and so more often than not showcased really impressive figure drawing.
How much did they pay for it?
>>7169962kek
>>7169758>Be commissioned monarchy portrait>Get high as fuck>Accidentally spill your raspberry soda all over your canvas>Wake up the next day, panic>Re-paint the face so it looks intentional>Trick the retards who think a taped banana is artIt's that shrimple, just find some trillionaire to nepo-hire you.
>>7171960Reddit is that-a-way ->
>>7169954>>7171960>>7172157>>7172201Didn't people realize by 2009 that this gay "aAaaah fuck you dad I don't want to go to church fuck your god shit i dont believe in magic sky faries like santa" shit was even more immature and outright retarded than any of the belief systems it tried to mock?
>>7176457It's the standard though, and people stick to standards hard because being ostracized hurts
>>7176457>not being my abrahamic cult is so immature and cringe dude. Grow up
>>7176566>FUCK YOU DAD!
It looks kinda cool, wish it had more contrast but maybe that's just the photography. The king's clothing blending into the background is a neat idea. I think it could have been taken further though and blended with a background that is more symbolic of Britian.
>>7172437>>7172462>>7172978totally not a samefag
How much toddler blood was used? Does the artist belong to their circles?
>>7176734it's all blood that charles coughed out
>>7169949That's edited though, you can simply flip the image and compare it to yours. The fact that you are not able to catch differences between two pictures shows how fucking bad you are at visual arts.
So how much monies did the artist manage to scam out of the royal family for this?
>>7169962kek x2
>>7176734>>7176750Its unironically the blood of Kate Middleton
>>7169758Subjugate the Irish.
>>7169758>>7169949>>7178102It isn't I just flipped it..Bros?
>>7179671pls delete. this is harming our psyop operation
>>7179671???
>>7179778da. well done sergei, we're so back
