Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Used my art lens for the first time in a long time. Didnt have much time to compose these photos but I had fun taking them![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
>>4308434>washed out shadows, muted highlights.You mean it has good dynamic range?
>>4309998All 100% legit.Would love to see some objectively sharper Leica lens shots though, I haven't really seen any "sharp" photos that aren't post-processed by either side of the camp.
>>4309998confirmed poser (not even the french spelling)
>>4309004Focus, at fucking last.
>>4309999>would ofwhat does that even mean?
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
is this insensitive / tone deaf?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D850Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern824Focal Length (35mm Equiv)48 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution0 dpiVertical Resolution0 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 21:11:20Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length48.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4310340Yes.
>>4310353because 22 years is too soon?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D850Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern824Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution0 dpiVertical Resolution0 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 22:03:27Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating110Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)133 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 09:27:55Exposure Time2607/125000 secF-Numberf/5.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance8.78 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.50 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1735Image Height3473
>>4310340Nice. I like it. The plane is just a tiny bit too small. Why insensitive?
Have you all actually tried these lenses? They're pretty cool.
>>4310110Use them in my Olympus om1 it’s part of getting that look from that era.Using my modern Nikon primes on the f100 produces something that looks halfway between film and digital.I much prefer film with these older style lenses.
>>4310328No, that's your mother.
>>4310159Not particularly, but Zeiss has a certain niche, and a lens doesn't have to be Zeiss-like to be good
>>4310232Yes, but they'll adapt rather easily to modern mirrorless (DSLRs are S.O.L. though, since the back element gets in the mirror's way). The Takumar 50s are also known for their heavy flaring when wide open. Pic related is f/1.4.
>>4310434This is probably a better example.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Is it truly possible to learn to have aesthetic/creative/artistic (or whatever word you want to use) vision, and intent with your photos? I’ve been taking snapshits sporadically for the better part of 20 years now (pops game me an ae1 in middle school), but I don’t think I’ve ever taken any really great pictures. >picrel, Ken Rockwell sliders applied to mediocre snapshitMy pictures seem to be more, just what I see, essentially just capturing the world as it exists with little meaning or really interest I’d say. Even calling it documentary would be too generous, it’s more cataloguing if anything. Can one break out of this box? Or is creativity like other inborn traits where you can train and practice but there’s a limit to how much you can do with what you’re born with? (/fit/ sisters can relate). I know probably it isn’t the best place to discuss since we’re snapshitters amongst snapshitters here, but surely this isn’t as good as it’ll ever get, right?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareILCE-7M2 v4.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2018:08:14 18:44:39Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness8.3 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3812Image Height3812Exposure ModeAuto BracketWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4310213These are the photographers who tell you that content beats quality (never mind every other “great” took the same snaps as everyone else on 4x5/8x10)
>>4310173Based me too. However I think it's important to capture things as they are. While it may be less meaningful now pictures from 150 yeFs ago the pictures of average people tell a much better story than the arranged portraits of famous people.
>>4310280You can do both>>4310279Quality is content.If something is razor sharp or dreamy, that's part of the content. It's not like photography ever showed the world exactly how people see it. Anyone who tells you otherwise (ie: "lens sharpness doesn't matter" "soft is always bad" "sharp is always bad" "muh micro 3d colontrast pops") is coping with something or has schizophrenia.
If you genuinely care about a subject or a place or a person, I believe your photos will reflect that. If you flit around between supposedly interesting things that you have no knowledge of or familiarity with, your photos stand little chance to be anything more than snapshots. Let's say you are an alien tasked with photographing a baseball game. What and whom do you focus on? When do you focus on them? When can you expect the people around to react, and how will they react? How will you position yourself to tell the story of the relationship of your subjects? There's a big difference between photographing the batter when he's standing around, versus in the batter's box, versus swinging and missing, versus making contact, versus striking a celebratory pose after he hits a home run, versus the look of frustration when the ball falls just short and the outfielder gets him out. How could you possibly know to expect all of these intricacies if you just show up and gawk?What's the best time and place to find a particular bird? Where's the best place in the city to look over the cathedral, and how does the differing lighting through the day change its appearance and mood? Where can you expect to find poor people, or rich people, or strange people?
>>4310102There's little natural contrast in this picture. Literal and abstract contrast is what makes a great picture. Ideally you use the literal contrast to highlight the abstract contrast.
ok your camera is cool but is it space worthy??[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D2XsCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern810Focal Length (35mm Equiv)42 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2013:07:17 10:01:13Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/8.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmCommentNASA S/N 1142 68.0FColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2848Image Height4288RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4309506It's worthy of being blown out the air lock.
>>4309514meanie
>>4308827You realize Sony donated money to partner with them so they'd bring this junk into orbit for advertising purposes, right?Space niggers do real imaging. Imaging. Read the word. Imaging. Not photography. A consumer "photography" camera has no purpose in space.They use raw sensors without color filters and swap custom filters for capturing real images with known wavelengths.If they're bringing meme cameras to film the crew inside the human habitable zones, well, that's not much of an accomplishment is it? If it's fit for humans, of course any camera should work.
Did you know on the moon landing Zeiss had a specially manufactured lens that Stanley Kubrick used in Barry Lyndon?
>>4310292Yes. Here's a good video on the subject for anyone who can stand the German accent.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p5E7iXxeQE
I make images for a living. Happy to answer any questions.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 9Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmImage Width2000Image Height1333RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4310036Sure. Will I? Ehhh. This is more of a Q&A thread.
Can you prove you are a professional
>>4309020Are you and your peers as concerned about AI as the graphic artists are?
>>4309020Do you just snapshit continuous high jpegs and have a phone stuck to your camera constantly uploading them to interns with NX mobile air?
>>4309020>ProPhotographers are 2.50 times more likely to commit suicide than average.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE CX6200 DIGITAL CAMERACamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 09:02:28Exposure Time193/20000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.99 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1588Image Height1007Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4310387>>4310388chickens are such nice creaturestook some pics of mine recently but either lost the perforation or something else so about 15 frames are all mangled together[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-4000Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 08:49:03Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width5895Image Height3690
>>4310396did you spend your trip shooting penis grafitti?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-4000Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 08:18:45Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3654Image Height5373
>>4310455[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-4000Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 08:18:40Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height5373
>>4309886basedi like the picture as well
i ended up kinda really liking this onenot sure why[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-4000Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:05 08:59:40Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3618Image Height5315
>pic relatedGot it in 2004 for my birthday. Dad spent $400 on this sucker plus the 256-512MB memory cards. It was awesome with the 4x optical zoom and fit in the back seat compartment of my motorcycle so I took it everywhere and got some great pictures. Sensor died not even three years later so my only complaint. I’ll have to grab a few shots from my computer later, but looking back at some of the pics I’m still impressed with the quality of this little guy. They sometimes have that “DSLR” look instead of the processed iPhone camera look.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1068Image Height801Scene Capture TypeStandard
this little guy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T1iCamera SoftwarePaintShop Pro 16.00Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1486Image Height1820Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2017:01:02 15:41:18Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1486Image Height1820Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
The first digital camera i actually bought myself was my Canon T3, that i still use.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I borrowed my brother's and my dad's powershot camera. Afterwards I had a Flip camera passed down to me that I sold. I experimented with super 8 not able to get an image that my parents donated. On my 18th birthday I got a T2i and from then on I've been using it for 11 years and I'm 29.
KODAK EASYSHARE CX6200 DIGITAL CAMERASurprised the quality was way better than upscaled vga webcam stuff for only 50 euros.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE CX6200 DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareVersion 1.0100Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiExposure Time657/125000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.99 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1632Image Height1232Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
who jamcam?
How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?>artemis mission back to the moon >using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width750Image Height750Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306253ai live editing evf is possible, or atleast camera can recognize scene and take a picture
>>4304863>mogged by iPhone lenslmao
>>4309859It's not possible with camera processors so shit they struggle to do HDR and panorama alignment 50% as well as right clicking in capture one
>>4304860>artemis mission back to the moonThere is no easy way for me to tell you this so I'll make it short and straight to the point.Space is fakeNukes are a hoaxEvolution is a lieEarth is flatDinosaurs never existed.
>>4309881Based as heck.
ITT: previous work from more than 10 years ago that you shotI'm doing a huge data migration and have had a second look at all of my early stuff when I had a Digital Rebel. I'll post stuff as I get through it and see it. This particular one is 2011.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:09:36Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4309320It'll be an architectural feature on some business in London. Sugars always farting around in the capital.
>>4310249Wall in Bikkrui Lounge, Orlando Florida.I was ****very**** drunk when I made those
>>4298895You did not take this photo.Egy only photographs random people walking.
>>4299060You gave them a refund, right?Or at least delivered the RAWs so they can not live in cringe forever?It's fine to suck, but giving baked JPEGs only should be a crime.
The more i look at old pictures, the more i think muh image quality is fucking pointless shit in cameras and photography. At least the image quality of today is sufficient. It's just very sophisticated advertisement of the market.
No matter what I do, I can't get my Nikon Z6 II to capture a sharp photo.Pinpoint AF, tripod, shutter delay, changing apertures, whatever. Even tethering and going completely hands off. Doesn't matter what I do or how I do it, everything always inevitably looks like shit down at the 1:1 pixel level. There's always a soft blur. Not a single point in the frame is ever truly sharp.This is a problem because I got this thing with the intent to digitize a bunch of stuff including some pretty big originals (too big to fit in a flatbed scanner) where I want to keep fine detail with 1:1 framing, no zooming in for separate "detail" shots. I set a goal for the ability to frame something 19x13 and get a sharp quality 300 DPI, but this isn't cutting it. At all. I don't know if it's my lens (NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8) or if it's my sensor not having enough resolution. Maybe the AA filter is ruining my fine details? or maybe advertised resolution itself is a scam when behind a bayer sensor?I only care about such fine details in situations where the camera will be mounted and capturing still subjects.Would a camera without an AA filter do better?Should I get a 45MP Nikon or a 61MP Sony?Would pixel shift likely solve all my problems?Image 1/2f/2.0 - blurryf/4.0 - sharpest center pointf/16 - deepest DOF, softened by diffractionComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
100% user error or shit processing unless the UPS guy drop kicked your lens.I wouldn't get a sony btw, if this bothers you, sony will bother you even more with all their raw cooking.
>>4310419Z6 II doesn't have such a mode.>>4310422f/4 is what yields max sharpness, at the center of the frame, which isn't crisp even there.Here's a 100% from f/4 in a flat perspective. Not a single point in the frame anywhere in it is close to being tack sharp.>>4310416Maybe. This is the only lens I have though and it is supposed to be great according to all review sites.>>4310421>focus in front of subject>focus shift shoot a few hundred frames at smallest step increment with e-shutter mode on, VR off>cherry pick "sharpest" image from the bunch based on the center>still not actually sharpI would like to blame me but I can't imagine a way to try and squeeze more out of the gear. I'm not missing focus on moving subjects I'm trying to tripod shoot non-moving stuff in ideal conditions.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4310413I bet shooting 4x5 would solve your problem.
>>4310433>The more I look into this shit it seems like everyone saying bayer offers anywhere near its advertised resolution is on some serious copiumYeah, digital color photography is inherently algorithmic and approximate, hence why I think digital purists are kinda retarded. With Bayer, your color resolution is 1/4 of your photosite count. If you want to view your scene at a certain size but are not happy with the sensor quality, use a higher megapixel one and downsample to the same size. The more you downsample, the less approximate it gets.To clarify the size thing, a higher megapixel sensor will have higher per-pixel noise since each pixel is smaller. Thus, it may actually look worse at a per-pixel level though obviously that will be more "zoomed in" compared to the 100% view on a lower megapixel sensor. Where you do see benefits however, is when viewing at the same picture size since the higher megapixel sensor will be sampling that image more finely.>The more I look into this shit it seems like everyone saying bayer offers anywhere near its advertised resolution is on some serious copium. On the other hand it seems like even people pointing out it isn't perfect also can't get their facts right. For example the site here says removing a bayer filter and shooting monochrome turns a 20MP EOS 6D into 80MP, but that should be impossible, in theory that could only make it a "real" 20MP.You're right, that's not how it works. 20MP is 20MP. Removing the CFA does make each pixel a whole lot more sensitive though, since it's no longer exposed to just one color.
>>4310433>Not a single point in the frame anywhere in it is close to being tack sharp.Looks pretty dern fine to me, chief, considering you're taking a picture of a US dollar bill which is mass produced ink on fabric and isn't gonna be perfectly sharp anywhere itself.
I don't understand. I've been taking photos and videos for over 10 years yet they still suck. I don't know why that is. I get told by family and friends my images are good, but every time I post it on the net there's someone there that says it's awful.Do you all know?(Side note to mods. The pepefrog image is related to photography. It shows him using a camera).
>>4310438BORING. I would title it "autism" so people would say I did such a great job on all my photos.
>>4310440You are not even Zack, as its spelled with a K NOT AN HWhat do you think of my photo tho?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z fCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:04:27 18:53:46Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4310442Idiot, and a fool. Look at OP and apologize. Your picture reminds me of the first image you see after a jump cut where a car drives over that bottle in a fast and furious movie.
>>4310446Actually I was curious why your youtube is Zack but your name here is Zach. Also I do kinda love your photos and the straightforward titles of them so Photos is what id call it. Also I only saw Fast and Furious once but thank you. Heres another i offer for your enjoyment and descriptions.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z fCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:01:31 07:09:56Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating1100Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias1.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4310447Thanks, I'll consider it. Reminds me of myself when I hear a meanie tell me my photos SUCK! JERK!
Is a nifty fifty necessary and a good second lens? Good telephotos have priced me out so that leaves something like pic related that is remote reasonably priced but has a function kit lenses don’t.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1000Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4305868I use an f/1 prime all the time for indoor and evenings. Also night street.>>4307573People just have no idea what ISO actually does, and why their images are noisy in the first place.If you don't know, here's the simple trick. If iso makes your image noisey, you didn't have enough light in the first place. All you have to do is get enough light so that you don't have any crushed blacks in your subject, and then turn iso up to get the level of exposure you want. 50 iso is for film l. There are no sensors with 50 iso as baseline. They are all 100. If your camera has <100 iso as a setting, it is a oost processing trick.
>>4308777Easy there, reddit.
>>4310330>I use an f/1 primeAn f/1 telephoto lens?
>>4310330>There are no sensors with 50 iso as baseline. They are all 100.Peak of mount stupid.>Z7 Native base ISO 64 (measured 50)>G9II base ISO is 100 (but also measured 50 - in full frame noise terms, it's 200, but still exposes like 50)
>>4310397>G9II base ISO is 100 (but also measured 50 - in full frame noise terms, it's 200, but still exposes like 50)>higher iso = more noiseNo, you are the one on mount stupid.
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
Reject Leica. Embrace Epson.
>>4310275whats your problem? ride your own bike
>>4310281I would love an updated version of this camera. I love the mechanical shutter. no lcd necessary i just need 24 megapixels because im printing
>>4309296I was going to write something about Nikon and Canon as a follow up but I thought people like you would remember the fact that Leica literally started 135 still photography and that Nikon and Canon were inferior copycats for the better part of a century. But I guess I'm a little too charitable, or naive, or whatever.
>>4308784>might legitimize some of the work I doit won't >>4309296>you're associating with actual good photojournalists. no you're not. >>4310435i don't know if this is a troll or not but the nikon f along with the leica m2 basically ended the vietnam war.
