continued from >>4293925i won't bother to ask for any sort of feedback this time. in fact, please refrain from responding at all. now i'm just posting for the sake of adding photos to the board. if you think they suck, then make a new thread and post better photos.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:12:13 21:35:12Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:25 01:22:21Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 23:41:52Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness6.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 00:35:08Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-2.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 02:50:20Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
Wow OP these all suck!
My mom cleared out her basement and gave me her old 110 camera she used back in the day. Anyone ever shot with this format? Looks like a roll is ~$10 and dev is $12 for 24 exposures. I don’t have high hopes since the negatives are so small, but it’s portable
>>4308045I mean...if you want to play with it just because, go ahead. But 110 and Kodak Disc were dog shit. They looked bad at 3x5.
i'd shoot lots of 110 if i could bulk roll hp5 and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffed
>>4311593Cut your own, and you can 3d print a reel
>>4311593>and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffedsounds like you just didn't look and wanted us to do the work for you, faggot, there's plenty of results for 110 reels on ebay from reputable brands and offbrand chinese>b-but skuffedwhat does that even mean?
>>4308389Looks like something Zach will take 10 years from now
Alright, now is the time to buy. Apparently hollywood is using soviet photo glass for movies now. Companies are rehousing them into film lenses. Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass. I know the Helios m42 is legend. what else should I look at. I am on L mount.
>>4307249i'm the anon that is in armenia, they're about $20 WITH the zenit cameras here, it's cheap as fuck
>>4304170Here is the list of most common ones with description and testshttps://radojuva.com/en/photo-review/#russian
>>4304170>soviet glass to L mount10/10 op thank you
I shouldn't have bought mine from Ukraine, it got stuck in K-City for nearly a month.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Modelmoto g power (2021)Equipment MakemotorolaSensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:03 18:08:00Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating400Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/1.7Exposure Time1/24 secFocal Length4.71 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryLight SourceD65Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness-1.8 EVExposure ModeAutoImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4304170>Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass.the Helios was a bit of an odd choice in this scene imo, it's just the emperor talking about politics with his daughter but the swirl makes it feel like a dizzying dream
I plan on getting a camera for decent feet photography. Most of the images I see are very unprofessional and of much lower quality than they could be. It would also be ideal if I could record decent 4K video with this camera.
>>4311654People who like feet want real women's feet. If it's a real woman, then you know there's a chance you could meet her one day and get a chance to sniff her feet and slobber all over them for hours.
>>4311684I NEED to know his website. I discovered this website that posts hot photos of teens around a year ago. It doesn't fit the definition of pornography, so it's perfectly legal. I imagine "subtle" images of feet would also not fit the definition of pornography, but so far, I haven't been able to find any websites featuring plenty of photos of teen feet.https://www.free-photos.biz/https://www.free-photos.biz/blog/https://www.free-photos.biz/photographs/people/photos_of_girls
>>4311654what would you rather watch;1 a real video or real ariana grande getting fucked hard and enjoying it2 fake AI video of cartoon ariana grande getting fuckedexactly... people want to see REAL WOMENS feet not some AI bullshit
>>4311684>>4311791https://www.stephanpartipilo.com/https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/3735515/497945
>>4311600imagine the cheesy scent of those feet
Why is the best setting?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 13:58:58Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1266Image Height918
>>4309904>Le manufacturers lieHave you ever actually looked it up?Sony/canon/nikon ISOs are all about 1/3 of a stop slower than the film standard is meant to be, barely anythingOnly fuji/olympus/panasonic are further off than that (2/3-1 stops slower than stated), because they mostly sell crop sensors and mislabeling ISO makes it easier for the marketing liars to say they have good dynamic range.>>4309893>There is no such thing as ISONot in dual gain cameras. They have two gain circuits that have different shadow recovery characteristics.>Sticking to ISO 100 when a shot calls for slightly more (like 1/3 of a stop) actually degrades quality.No it doesn't because 1/3 of a stop more ISO is within that gain stage, only aperture and shutter speed actually control how much light you get into the camera. That becomes a question when you're choosing say, ISO 200 or 400 on a camera where the second gain stage kicks in between 200 and 400. Then shoot at the second base ISO and you get less noise. If you recover shadows past the second base ISO it also typically looks a bit worse than just shooting at that ISO but who the fuck would recover more than 3 stops of exposure
For some reason one day I woke up and just stopped giving a shit about noise. 400? 800? 1600? Fuck it, we ball. Too noisy? Shrink the image by 20% in post. Looks fine. Fuck the police. Way more important to have a sharp/stable image. Push that shutter speed to the fucking moon. Push it. Force it. Make it your bitch.
>>4309954Did the same thingOne morning I woke up, glued 4 handfuls of sand to a pair of sunglasses, and walked around wearing them so I could truly immerse myself in the best visual experience man has to offer.
>>4309736>>4309812>>4309954Holy mother of based.
Now that ISO invariance is a thing there is no reason (except jpegs) to change ISO on the camera rather than shooting at 100 and pushing 6 stops in post. You're just throwing away headroom for no benefit. I don't know why they don't just make ISO an exif field that tells your RAW program to push it rather than changing the actual pixel values. >>4309893>The electronics can ETTR better than you can fiddling with ISOThey could, but they don't because camera manufacturers are stuck in this dumb "muh jay pegs must look good" mindset. It would be so easy with mirrorless, you're reading off the whole frame anyway, you could just find the brightest pixel and adjust exposure so that the brightest channel is at 2^14 or whatever the max pixel value is. Nikon even has a mode that claims to do this ("highlight-weighted metering") but I've caught it both over and underexposing the raw files presumably to make the jpegs look better.
>>4302169I want to use its tail to clean some bottles and jars.
>>4302424why so desaturated
>>4309646Personal preference.
Red Panda
>>4302169giwtwm
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1715068395898276.webmwsg/thread/5539653#p5540323Now say fuji's af is bad again
>>4311522Because it's been the ergonomic preference the majority for like, 40 years, to control aperture in a user-set increment using a dial on the grip.
>>4311544+ Adding one or two tiny plastic dials on camera is much easier and cheaper than adding aperture ring on lens
>>4311522Actually I could pass on the manual aperture ring, when I had a Fuji I just controlled it with the front dial. That being said having an iso and dedicated exposure comp dial was legitimately useful and should be on more cameras instead of just restricted to 'retro' cameras.
>>4311546There was a period where people had both and people actually wanted the aperture ring gone because it would accidentally get bumped and it would make the controls confusing to have two aperture controlsLenses without the aperture ring came out. Reception as positive. People chose the scroll wheel. >>4311555Sony actually has this layout. Front is aperture, rear left is shutter, rear right is exposure compensation, rear bottom can be mapped to ISO.It's really annoying and preferable to at least map ISO to a button instead, because there's so many dials that inevitably one is easy to bump.
>>4311564The fuji dials have a push button lock to prevent bumping. Do Sonys have the same?
You can't tell me one real pro of crop sensors. There's absolutely no point of APS-C when full frame exists. It's not as small, compact or economical as micro four thirds nor do you get the resolution and capability of FF. I guess it's just so that people can feel like they're larping as FF. FF is isn't even that much more expensive most of the time so being a poorfag is the only excuse[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2022:01:10 21:03:15Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height683
>>4311417>They're small because they're fixed aperture primes with a storage position. >Just consoomer cucking that could have been done as easily on a DSLR.Nope, because they are f/11 an optical viewfinder wouldn't realy work well with such lenses.And neither would the AF sensors in most DSLRs.>Better sensors>You mean better noise reduction.Not realy, the sensors themselfes have also gotten better at producing a higher signal/noise ratio to begin with.Noise reduction has gotten better as well, but that's not what I was talking about.Anyway, they are just about the only lenses with that kind of range on FF that are not super bulky/heavy
>>4311357>show me one wide angle lens for DSLRs that doesn't require complicated retrofocal opticsHere you go, unless you consider a 5 element design "complicated".
>>4311442Canon sensors have gotten better because they were subpar to begin with, and mostly they got better at applying forced NR.
>>4311374>Zeiss made lens systems capable of projecting in excess of 200 000 lp/mmWhich one is that?
>>4311465A system they designed for ASLM wich is used by TSMC now, operates in EUV (13,5 nm) and is a purely mirror based system.Light starts to behave weird at that kind of wavelength as lenses stop working and nothing reflects it well anymore.So they had to come up with a whole new type of Mo/Si multilayer mirror system that had to be absolutely defect free.
I have heard very very good things about the Ricoh GRIII on YouTube and Reddit and am about ready to pull the trigger to make photography fun again and have a camera that is truly always with me so I don't miss any special moments.But recently I have checked some of the photos from the camera on Instagram and they seem really poor. The smearing is almost worse than an iPhone 15 Pro and it's a lot bigger and almost the same price. Has anyone here actually used one or have links to good photos taken with them? I don't want to waste money if it is just a meme and not actually good.
>>4311013its an old meme, but im glad its still kicking around.
>>4311009no flash is a killer imo. all the daido moriyama wannabes need that flash
>>4310814Why is this so smeared>>4310941and this so crisp?Is the GRIII just really bad at higher ISO?
>>4311099the basedboy is handholding it indoors, its probably using something dumb like 1/20 and low max iso or some shit. My griii is perfectly capable of nice clean images. but this would be the same issue with any camera.
>>4310814GR fags are delusional. Stay away. Faggot in OP pic is exactly the kind of retard who falls for this shit.
Critique is welcome, though of course I won't necessarily adopt it. I enjoyed snapping these, hope you enjoy looking at it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Color Filter Array Pattern26748Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:02:29 19:29:48Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/6.7Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-1 EVSubject Distance0.63 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length45.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2425Image Height1781RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>>4309987[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 100Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)44 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 14:13:38Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height3018RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeShutter Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 100Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)44 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 14:13:53Exposure Time1/550 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness4.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height3098RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 100Camera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)44 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:07 20:58:35Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-2.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height2753RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>4309985Nice bike.
>>4309989beautiful
I'm a bandwagon iPhone phototaker going down the Fujifilm rabbit hole.First about to buy the Fujifilm XV100, didn't so almost ordered a Ricoh griii hdf, kept going and looking at Olympus Pen F, nope. Now I am at Sigma fp.now considering Nikon d70s, for ccdWhere does this stop? :oWhere does this path finally end?
>>4310724It ends when you decides it ends. I rediscovered a photo I took a couple year ago and I thought it was decent. Then I remembered my hating it because my camera is shitty and makes a bunch of grain. I tried to find some bullshit ai app to try to fix it but it didn't work. Now I like the roughness of it.
>>4311418It actually ends when you have a very nice camera, and a very shit camera. The gulf between the two will make you appreciate each.Don't fall for the film meme that just starts a whole other gearfaggotry quest full of cope because the sunk costs only grow and there are no refunds.
>>4310724It never ends. You will eventually find something like >>4310799 said. But what happens then is that your style of shooting will change, or your hobbies outside photography will change, or your subject matter will change and then you'll start the whole process over again. It really never ends, learn to enjoy it and only buy what you can afford to lose 30% of your money on.It's either that or start shooting film.
>>4311427lets be real "normal" interchangeable lens cameras fit everything you could do perfectly well and it takes borderline schizophrenic neuroticism like "everyone can see my camera because it has a viewfinder bump and its ruining my shots and it looks so much bigger on pxlmag" to convince yourself otherwise
>>4310815>a Kodak CCD like an Epson RD1(s)I thought the R-D1 used the same Sony-made sensor as the Nikon D100 and the Pentax istD.
Why do old photographs looks so crystal sharp? Is it because of the giant glass negatives?
wheres all yalls bmws at 16. gotta feed that growing senpai nigga
>>4306416>believability of ken being a millionaire from selling condos goes up 100%Wow, these iphones are amazingI can hardly tell it from his canon R5
>>4297395>Saturated fat>>4297397Saturated fat, probably.
>>4308020Kek
>>4306416Uh oh.
I was browsing flickr today and came across this photo taken with a Canon Powershot G9.How was this effect achieved?
>>4307725Horse feet move when they're running, buildings don't move. Notice how blurred the building in the background is?
>>4307726>buildings don't movesource??
>>4307714mong isn't a name of any ethnicity, that would be mongol instead you fucking mongoloid
>>4307726do you have a single fact to back that up?
>>4307726That's from the Earth spinning you idiot.
ok your camera is cool but is it space worthy??[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D2XsCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern810Focal Length (35mm Equiv)42 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2013:07:17 10:01:13Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/8.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmCommentNASA S/N 1142 68.0FColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2848Image Height4288RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4310292Yes. Here's a good video on the subject for anyone who can stand the German accent.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p5E7iXxeQE
>>4298286I would gladly fire my S1R into the sun if that counts.I might have to send Elon an message and see what we can do.
>>4298437>so I can't imagine there is really any leeway for a space-walker to get creative with their subject or exposure.Perhaps the ultimate ever f8 and show up.
>>4302659>turns out that the Earth is neither round or flat, it's half a sphereholy shit
>>4311136Rainbows come from the dome.
In the context of film data sheets what does "daylight" mean? How many kelvins? 5000K? 6000K?
>>4310857I bought 5 rolls from brooktree instead of spooling it myself
>>4310870Based and lazy pilledI always get 42-43 exposures out of those
How do you convert Log Exposure (lux-seconds) table to EV+/- dynamic range ?
>>4311153https://www.filmshooterscollective.com/analog-film-photography-blog/a-practical-guide-to-using-film-characteristic-curves-12-25scroll down
>>4311188Ok thanksI'm trying to create exposure profiles in sekonic light meter for some film stocks i'm planing to use