After buying 4 prime lenses, then playing around with some old lensesI have realized one thing:>the lenses don't really matter>crap lens look good because they're crap >therefore more realistic>ultra sharp lenses look digital and unreal>it's the artifacts that makes it cinematic>the film cameras have layers upon layers of mat box filters and lens "scent" glasses to achieve an airy cinematic look
>the lenses don't really matter>crap lens look good because they're crap >therefore unusual and intresting>ultra sharp lenses look too real so are not intresting>it's the artifacts that makes it cinematic>the film cameras have layers upon layers of mat box filters and lens "scent" glasses to achieve an airy cinematic lookI'm short-sighted, I love sharp lenses because they provide me a different wiev of reality.
i feel like lenses matter more than almost anything else for the actual "look" of an imagei only like shooting certain focal lengths, and i just have a bunch of "redundant" lenses so i can pick and choose the aesthetic I wantshoot enough that you can identify what lens and aperture you took a shot with, just by looking at it
>>4314719>shoot enough that you can identify what lens and aperture you took a shot with, just by looking at itPost an example.
>>4314745An example that different lenses can render scenes differently? An example that the same lens will have different characteristics at different apertures?Or are you just calling me out on being a nophoto?
>>4314860I'm legitimately interested in seeing comparison images from the lenses you have in the same focal length.
Why do photo shooters HATE motion blur so much?Motion blur is what accentuates the MOTION, duhhh, how else would you know your subject is in motion??? The human eye is at 360 degrees shutter speed all the time.I do video most of the time. I keep the shutter speed between 180 to 360 degrees, if the scene exceeds the speed of the lens, I'll have no choice but to raise it. But if the scene is too bright, I'll use a VND filter to keep it at 180.>but muh shakes>just buy a gimbal rather than a fast lens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1600Image Height1157
>>4312691bcause the subject isn't moving, why would there be motion blur?If you shoot a moving car, it looks like they're still, there's osmething wrong with you
>>4312689It's generally aesthetically unpleasant, even if done on purpose
>>4312692your one job was to post a pic of blur that you think looks good to make your case. But instead you're just a rambling retard
>>4312689Because reality scanning and communicating feeling are two different things
I think the worst are shutter speeds that are slow, but not quite slow enough that make moving things seem like soft or unfocused instead of having proper blur
>mfw a pocket "camera" faggot insist that I take them seriously as photographers
>>4314570It has half a shutter
>>4314491>mfw another faggot posts a photoless thread
>>4314491This but phone
>>4314491Post a good photo
>>4314491>pocket "camera"It's a poor man's poor man's poor man's Leica.
I just found out these can be really useful for more than just macro, which I found out that are great for getting a 1:1 ratio on your subject.What I didn't know is something like a 105mm/2.8 also makes an outstanding portrait lens along with even an all-around good prime lens. Also typically it'll be cheaper than a similar fast lens. Is this really the best type of lens for all pictures until you need some kind of zoom?
>>4309479they tend to not do too hot at or near infinity
>>4309479I wish fast Macro lenses were more popularReminder to all of you that Tamron's current lens lineup was originally going to also include a 300mm f/2.8 VC USD with 1:1 macro
>>4314670>a 300mm f/2.8 VC USD with 1:1 macroWould it have actually been 300mm at 1:1 or would they have cheated using focus breathing?
>>4314672It wasn't specified but that would require the minimum focus distance to be 0.6 meters which would require the lens itself to be quite compact for its rated speed
>>4314670fast macros don't make sense
post ur train/station/tracks pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 13:51:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4314763[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1659Image Height1035Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1200 dpiVertical Resolution1200 dpiImage Created2014:09:19 22:25:36Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1603Image Height1000
Went for a walk on a lunch break and got lucky. I don’t know which of these I like more[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.00.011 (220309)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:28 07:47:13Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1453Image Height1024
>>4314775[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.00.011 (220309)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:28 07:47:13Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1453Image Height1024
Flex your current vintage setup! Let me see emm! Photo is of my current Canon Av-1[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1290Image Height2796Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4312335LOL broke boy can’t afford a new camera xD
>>4312335a thread died for you, gearfag
i win[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern794Focal Length (35mm Equiv)86 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:17 22:43:33Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length86.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2832Image Height2832RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>Be me, research fisheye lenses.>Look online how people put them into use>It is all just skateboard related contentSure, there are some who are able to find creative purposes, but it seems to me like whenever someone intends to show what a fisheye lens is capable of all they can think of is taking photos and videos of skateboarding. How strange! Just because some faggots in America used them for that purpose in the 90s.
>>4313123>I'd love to dive and take photosAlso learn to master buoyancy, before taking a camera. It'll help you get more winning shots than the latest camera equipment.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:14 22:13:49Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4311172Because fisheye is a massive gimmick that you can't really do a lot with? I've owned an 8mm lens for 10 years and never use it.
>>4313681Don't you know some skaters you can go photograph?
>>4313243Interestingly enough, your post got me curious and they weren’t around that early, but the first model WAS a film camera in like 2003. Neat.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height433Scene Capture TypeStandard
fisheyes are fun for concert photography
Why do you hate him?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4314398What the actual fuck is the purpose of thisstitching for MAXIMUM resolution?
>>4314455it's necessary to take a picture of just ONE of my balls
>>4314579ImpressiveDo you have an OF so we can see
>>4314398neat
>>4313142Based
Why is fuji so incapable of making decent eyecups?prev thread >>4286424
>>4314732Mitakon 65mm f1.4 is the common option, TTArtisan 50mm f1.4 for m-mount has fairly adequate coverageim firmly in the 100mp gfx or dont bother camp though
>>4314746>im firmly in the 100mp gfx or dont bother camp thoughThey give you the option to shoot 35mm lenses in square format though.
>>4314757true, picrelstill would rather go high res ff mirrorless over the 50mp gfx models thoughrather shoot 35mm square on 35mm too, mid frame becomes the edge vs edge becoming mid frame[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.7 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2890Image Height4334Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:17 10:33:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width5276Image Height4334
>>4314732Gapped microlenses lolIts just an ancient pentax 645z in a more poorly made body, sans glorious ovf. At least the gfx100 compensates for general fuji build quality issues (WR so bad you can see the circuitry with a flashlight)
>>4314151ok i take it back a little bit after looking at some of fuji's mf film bodies. it does seem nifty>>4306919x100 or another xpro are your best options >>4314383>when will fuji make a full framenever>>4314732the gf 50mm is literally perfect normal and is the most portable native lens. there's also a tiny contax/yashica mount 45mm f2.8 which is around 35mm ff equiv. it has good sensor coverage and it's mega small even with the adapter
Pre-summer 2024 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4294741Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4314483Anon needs to buy one large v-mount battery and a v-mount battery plate. That way anon can take one battery with him when he hikes. The only issues is that that one battery might cost more then the video camera it is powering.
>>4314483china batteries are $12 each, weigh nothing, and can be charged via usbc same as a phone
>>4314084I have been looking at the Sigma fp. It is very compact, it records to SSDs which would solve my capacity issue if I don't use the 12bit raw. It also seems like it has great low light performance. One problem with it is the battery life. One problem is that the EVF is so expensive, and would be necessary (a reason I'd rule out the fx3/0).I think I may just end up with a camcorder. I saw there are some newer camcorders which can do 10 bit 4:2:2
>>4314505i just assume most anons asking questions don't have v-mounts, monitors or recorders.>>4314510bargin basement china batteries swell and warp, hopefully not in the camera. we literally had a drone battery hiss and shoot gas at my job last year and it wasn't even the std 3rd party garbage
>>4314594When I got my bmpcc 4k. I bought a v-mount battery and a v-mount battery plate since I wanted to be able to shoot for a whole day without needing to swap batteries. The batteries costs just as much as the camera did but it let me record for the whole day so I could record live bands to a 2tb ssd without needing to worry about swapping media and/or batteries and missing something at the music festival. Plus, I was so high I wouldn’t be able to change a battery at that festival even if my life depended upon me doing it.
Just splurged on picrel, basically a 4x5 Big Shot, what am I in for? Anyone ever even see one of these before?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1522
>>4314439Oh wait.. It has that goofy string focus thing. That's kinda cool, but still fairly limiting.What's your plan with the camera?
>>4314445>>4314451Probably spent way more than it’s worth but I had some cash to burn from some compulsory overtime this pay period, 300usd. I understand it will be limiting but it might be fun like the Polaroid is, has a graflok back so I can mount an instax onto it as well as roll film etc. just wanted to mess around with it really, no overarching plan lol. Don’t eBay groggy on the toilet in the mornings, kids.
>>4314486The limiting nature will make it a fun camera to use until you want more from a 4x5. Looks like the lens is worth at least 200 bucks, and it is cambo. I have no clue on the quality of takamura lenses.You can say you own a cambo now as well!
>>4314439>what am I in for?How do you get one and ask this after, are you retarded?
>>4314681It’s the 4chan way. My favorite is on /tv/, the ol “I’m about to watch X movie, what did I think about it?” And so on. Timeless setup.
Do any of you guys take pics of toys, figures, model trains, dioramas, or anything of that sort? it's something I've been wanting to try my hand at.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern846Focal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:16 14:47:48Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCool White FluorescentFlashNo FlashFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 23:30:52Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness5.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3400Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:06 22:15:52Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2435Image Height3409RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownImage QualityRAWWhite BalanceAUTOFocus ModeAF-SFlash Compensation0.0 EVFlash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVLens TypeUnknownLens Range50.0 mm; f/1.4Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations2905
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 6Camera SoftwareHDR+ 1.0.540104767zdMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4080Image Height3072Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:09 01:30:18Exposure Time41749/1000000 secF-Numberf/1.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating239Lens Aperturef/1.9Brightness1/10 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.63 mMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.81 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4080Image Height3072RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio2Scene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
I did toy photography what seems like another lifetime ago
>>4254288Yes I was a /p/ user before I started building models. I haven't put much effort into photographing them but I spend a lot of time on custom builds now. Pic related was the last gundam kit I finished.Mg hazel.
Post your favorite shots of animals that you've taken. This isn't so much a gearfaggotry thread, but discuss your favorite telephoto lenses if you'd like. For me, it's the Sigma 150-600 F5-6.3.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:16 20:10:51Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length281.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:16 17:45:53Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length213.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Wonderful photos, thank you guys for posting :D I'm kinda surprised, the last one of these that I made 404'd pretty quick[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.9Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4734Image Height3156Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:07:03 16:58:57
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSiFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.9Serial Number1170342274Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:12 14:28:58Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4272Image Height2848RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeContinuousFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceShadeExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Color Matrix129
>>4314530I like his lil hands holding him on the pad.
Seeing these cameras go for about £600 on eBay used at the moment. I only just bought one a few years ago for about double the price used, what gives? I know the S5ii and iix have much better autofocus for video but honestly if you want to get into filmmaking, this camera is an absolute bargain now for what it can do.The built in H265 with vlog is fantastic. L Mount means you can adapt a shit ton of vintage glass to it and it can be easily rigged out into a cinema camera if needed. Think I might snag myself another one soon to use as a B cam for documentary and gig work.
>>4310873>lifeless, neutral colors always NEED "grading"so... a raw file?
>>4310906No? Raw files do not contain colors. The input profile for the raw does. Raw files do produce different data from the same colors compared to raw files from different cameras, but there's no actual color in them. They're monochrome grids. A program running an algorithm uses an input profile to guestimate color from the monochrome grid.Most editors have a totally flat profile to start from plus a editor specific interpretation and a few camera matching profiles that replicate SOOC jpegs. Capture one, for example, is known for their very good input profiles that are like camera matching+.Maybe you meant "so... a log gamma?". Maybe, but panusonic color science in sooc video is dull enough that you might as well shoot in log.
>>4310913this guy is retarded
>>4309250>Full frame>VideoWhy do people keep doing this to themselves
>>4310873Did your brain get fried by fiddling too much using your film simulation dial on a Fuji so that you can only enjoy oversaturated colors?If you really believe a cheapo S5 is for gear chasers, do you also believe that. the GH5 and before that the Canon EOS 5D MKII were for gear chasers? Those cameras are just beginner-priced modes of entry that offer a lot of flexibility vs. other cameras. A gear chaser would opt for something like the Sony ZV-E1, which offers a whole lot of compromise, awful colour science and a few gimmicks for 2500 bucks upwards.
and even though i as a 40 year old millennifart boomer often shit on gen-z i think it is kinda cool. Just imagine them going to whatever social gathering they are assembling in, bringing out all these cool semi-vintage digicams that nobody gave 2 shits about until recently..The market is absolutely booming right now.. they want it all. The shittiest model you can imagine? Guess what.. they want it and they want to pay more than yesterday.In certain niche markets these things sell for even above ebay prices which is insane.Gen-z is unironically making photography fun again?It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place. So what happened exactly? My viewpoint is the following:Younger Gen-z social media users have only used cellphones for photography.. they have finally realized that the platform has limitations.. they look at pictures their parents took of them when they were kids using digicams and want that particular look etc, meanwhile the large camera companies have completely neglected this market segment thanks to plebs only using their phones. just look at Canon for instance.. they haven't released a single Ixus model in 7 years and their last hoorah was nothing special in terms of specifications so we have to go back even further to find their high end models. Other companies have done the same.. there is nothing to be seen from the likes of Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Fuji, Samsung or any of the companies that for years made these ultra-compact and cool looking cameras.It find it all really strange. You have a generation that simply loves this type of stuff and nothing to sell them. Just imagine these cameras with updated hardware, maybe some fresh colors and "limited edition" varieties.Also feel free to post pics of cool digicams.
>>4314315Android cameras are higher quality than ifag cameras lel>>4314309No, sony definitely makes a point and shoot. Its just expensive because its actually a good camera and not a “slowing down makes ur fotos good - see all building corners” cope camera.
>>4314309>They have nothingnopehttps://electronics.sony.com/imaging/c/compact-cameraswhat else is there?om system tough - rebranded tg6. smaller sensor than sony compacts. worse iq. at least it's water-proof-ish right?after sony ducks out all pns cameras will be baby sensor chinese generics such as thesehttps://www.amazon.com/s?k=digital+cameraand many more to be found on aliexpress>>4314318no, all lumix zs and lx cameras are totally discontinued and use smaller sensors than phones so who the fuck cares. tards will prefer old models because le retro, photographers want 1" sensors at least.never mind that LE RETRO 1/2.3 sensor compacts are not any different from the brand new ones made in china... kek. a fool and his money are soon parted after watching a "....takes infinite film photos" youtube video.
>>4314406>Android cameras are higher quality than ifag cameras lelthat's not what i'm saying lol any advantage androids have is nerfed when uploaded to instagram
>>4314654>advantage androids have is nerfed when uploaded to instagramI don't actually think that's true. At a certain point (iirc like 26mp) Instagram will reject the file for being too big, so I did an experiment where I downscale it to 20mp vs a 2mp (1080p) file and the smaller file was very soft in comparison. Letting them do the compression for you results in higher image quality. Given that the differences are going to be less drastic than that, it should preserve the differences between them.But then again I don't believe that android cameras would look significantly better to begin with, all phone cameras look like shit
>>4314422>photographers want 1" sensors at leastIf that's the bar to reach, Canon still has their X models.
