Used my art lens for the first time in a long time. Didnt have much time to compose these photos but I had fun taking them![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
By "art lens" I'm assuming you mean some lens you built as an art project and not one of those wide aperture Smigmas? Looks like you missed focus in every shot except for the one of the blokes arses, very peculiar indeed.
>>4308402lol. 35mm Sigma art lens. I was using soft focus deliberately.
>>4308391Can you cut to the chase and show us her tits?
>>4308401He’s cute anon, what’s his name? Look at those adorable hrt buds
I can't unsee sigma's flat renderingOnce someone pointed out that sigma lenses were used to shoot top gun I'm starting to see it in peoples photosOh and it's the exact same rendering as the nikon Z 70-200 and 100-400
>>4308412what does flat rendering even mean?
>>4308407>her
>>4308418It's a buzzword people use, but only after they find out it's shot through a Sigma. Tell them it's a Leica next time.
>>4308418Too sharp wide open, washed out shadows, muted highlights.
>>4308418All midtones all the time with an overly sharp subject and a bokeh blasted f1.4 background. No contrast, just definition. Look at leica sample photos for the polar opposite.
Is this really considered acceptable image quality for modern digital shooter? Just wow.
>>4308391>>4308403Looks like my fooji when i use AF
>>4308403>I was using soft focus deliberately>>4308453Lmao this guy misses focus and thinks that saying it was done on purpose makes it look less bad.
>>4308434So in fact it just means high quality optics?
>>4308456Yes, soft focus in order to give a hazy, dreamy look to the subject
>>4308471People here are pretty terrible for artistic stuff. Just do whatever that best realizes your creative vision
>cow ring
>>4308461It's a "blank slate". Some people like it, others say its "flat" and "lacks soul" when they can't edit. Personally I'd still prefer something less flat, editing stuff shot with sigma art usually means darkening the shadows and pushing the white and black points to get more contrast.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width1747Image Height2048
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height2048
I like the colors. Not sure if I'd call that 'art', but hey, decent shots overall, people post worse shit here. The dude in the pictures has some pretty weird poses, though.
Nuffig meisje. Ik vind haar leuk.
>>4308502Wat is deze
>>4308401>>4308391ISO?
>>4308509800, but all photos are stepped down by 1
>>4308480yep thats the idea. 4chan will talk shit but i just like taking photos idc[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
happy trans girls make me sad because iwnbaw ;_;
>>4308516>>4308481>>4308453>>4308441>>4308434>>4308428>>4308420>>4308412>>4308411>>4308407>>4308402is this a man or a woman????
>>4308518Does it matter?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
>>4308518Just because a girl looks a bit haughty.Fucking loser. I wish you were closer I would end you and make this world better.
>>4308521what does haughty mean
>>4308522nuffig
>>4308518It's a man, just like OP is a tranny snapshitterI mean calling them snapshits is a stretch, as snapshits tend to actually be in focus and have some sense of natural beauty and aesthetics captured in the scene
>>430853199.99999% of photographs are snapshitswhat matters is the meaning and happiness of the shooter.
Grim
Lesson learned OP: Defocus looks worse than diffusion filter
>>4308543oh no he's going to find out about 1/4 black mist
>>4308403Lol that lens does not have soft focus, so you just missed it completely
>>4308548or worse, glimmerglass 1
>>4308553>Lol that lens does not have soft focus, so you just missed it completelyyou can have soft focus by just focusing on anything other than the subject. . .
>>430857799% of soft focus photos either used a special lens, or a filter medium (vaseline, hairspray, actual filter, etc) because defocus does other, weird things and just looks shaky with most lenseslike you took the photo as an earthquake started, or have parkinsons
>>4308578it was on 1/50 so yeah
>The virgin zoomer: Paid $200 for a schneider hollywood black magic to put on their foolji and ttfartisans, had to apply for another credit card>The cucked milennial: Turned his focus ring because he went broke buying sigma fart lenses, ate ramen for a week>The chad boomer: smeared vaseline directly on his lens, didn't even bother to buy a $5 chinese UV filter
>>4308577>you can have soft focus by just focusing on anything other than the subject. . .lol, lmao even>OOF is soft focus!
>>4308588Why would you do that?
>>4308591autism[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
>>4308391Does she know you’re creep posting her on a Sudanese artisanal camera obscura forum? Kinda weird desu.
thread almost makes me like white women>>4308397I kinda like this photo
There's just something bad about how things look with sigma lenses that isn't common to other sharp wide open lenses ie: nikkor S
>>4308594>thread almost makes me like white womenwhy? she looks like a literal man
>>4308596Is it the jaw or the cheeks that are slightly masculine? I'm not very good at analyzing people's facesshes a solid 6/10
>>4308601some people think literally every white woman who isnt built like a fantasy elf is manly and inside their fap folder is 9001 asian bitchesand this is an anime website
>>4308609Is it the Adam's apple thinly disguised by the chocker?
your photos are nice OPand she is beautiful[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height800Scene Capture TypeStandard
>bad composition>horrible color grading>ugly out of focus qualityThese are the peioke buying $1000 lenses
>>4308579>can't be stable snapping a 35mm lens at 1/50Work your technique what the fuck, i take photos on windy days with an 80mm equivalent at 1/50 and 1/3 of them come unblurry, no stabilization either
>>4308845its called walking while shooting
>>4308845Why do you go on the internet and type lies to strangers when you are upset?
>>4308845Surely you have one you can show us, right?
These are objectively shit. I could have gone the rest of my day without seeing this. None of these are in focus and there's tons of motion blur in the indoor game hall shots. This is a Sigma 35/1.4 ART you mean to tell me you are so shit at photography you have one of the best low-light 35mm lenses money can buy (because I have one too so I know) and you still fumbled getting her in focus and avoiding motion blur. Jesus Christ I could have nailed these on my fucking Pixel 7 better than you did. You spent all that money on a good lens and still couldn't buy any talent. >>4308849and you still fucked it up, that lens does f1.4 you mean to tell me you fumbled a low light shot with that kind of capability, this is like losing a boxing match to a retard with a cleft palate and a congenital hand deformity. You're not a photographer you're a GWC, Guy With a Camera and until you develop your skills and get more practice in, study the classics and then practice some more, you will never be a photographer.God damn read a fucking book, this one, pic related. Don't come back here until you have done something useful with your pathetic excuse of an existence you grab-asstic piece of amphibian shit.
>>4308391stay away from girls like her anon
>>4308875bro probably had his shit on auto
>>4308866>>4308871sure, this was the day I bought a EF 50mm F1/8 II for night photography, for my APS-C camera.I decided to explicitly test the lens at night to compare how many more T-stops it has over the 3.5-5.6 kit lens I have, which are absolutely abhorrent to use for fast-moving subjects at night. Dxomark has values but I doubt the accuracy. hence ignore the subjective content of the photographs, I don't even take street photos in the first place.These lens suffer from coma wide-open.>IMG_1868.jpg: File too large (file: 11.57 MB, max: 5 MB)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelEOS 1200DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.10-179-g11240bc97Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.2Lens NameEF50mm f/1.8 IIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width5184Image Height3456Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:26 20:53:34Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramManualLens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed256Color Matrix132
>>4308897you can really see the comas here, looks like its vertically blurred but the bushes don't lietook 4 photos, took the 1st with AF which failed, the 2nd is shaky, the last 2 are fine; that was the 3rd one>but you said it's windyit was and I was standing right next to the corner of a building, which made it more intense,; the bushes in the photo waved way less than the tiny brushes standing right below me even though they were in the middle of nowhere. If i stood a meter back I'd be sheltered from the majority of the wind gusts but I'd then be standing in the spotlightI am quite happy with the lens considering the measly 60 euro[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelEOS 1200DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.10-179-g11240bc97Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.2Lens NameEF50mm f/1.8 IIImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72Vertical Resolution72Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramManualLens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed256Color Matrix132
>>4308391>>4308392>>4308393>>4308394>>4308395>>4308396>>4308397>>4308398>>4308401I like your photos, OP.Has that cinematic quality to it; like when you pause a movie and take a screencap kind of vibe.
>>4308849Yeah dont do thatYou need to shoot at fucking 1/2000 if you're moving while shooting
>>4308796she is a demon, look at the literal malice in her eyes, not a flouride stare yet a prerequisite leading up to it, she is giving you a stare as if she wants to butcher your cock just because u are a man, that bitch is wild, the choker kinda seals the deal, she can't even muster a smile, a lot like if you told a demon to show positive emotion, that bitch is possessed, no amount of high quality lenses can give her charisma, all she can do now is perversion and manipulation, couldn't you find a sweeter girl to take photos of, she is giving me femcel vibes.
>>4308909and even when she does giggle a little bit in the third pic, its a very jewish, goblin type of snide smile, so even when she can't help smiling it comes out as a goblin snicker, goddamn. People are blaming the lens but u need to find a better more natural model, the person u are photographing is just as important as your camera and your skills using it.
>>4308897>>4308902p.s. 4chan's metadata reader is bugged and it's reading some other tag as ISO instead. It probably isn't aware of Canon-specific EXIF tags that I copy from the CR2 when exporting. Both were shot with ISO 800.
>>4308909she's the opposite of a femcel, although she does have a tragic life that would make some people bitter and jaded like incelst. Fuckbuddy
>>4308910>>4308909>I was molested as a childI'm so sorry. A playful arcade doesn't suit her personality and she would look better if she were shot in front of an office building with a canon+L lens but you're just deranged here.
>>4308897Remember this is the guy giving you advice
>>4308927What are you implying here?
>>4308894He's not like the other girls.
>>4308924i have a fucked up situation too eggs cost 7 dollars, u want a medal or smth?
>>4308951it's not improving>>4308955yikeshave you considered switching to a canon powershot s95 i think it would play better with your style
>>4308951Greasy ass looking hair
>>4308518Dutch women actually look like thist. knower
>>4308987If I see that fucking cat one more ti-
>>4308587This is quite cool. Keep it up, glad someone's got the balls to post actual pictures on /p/ when the threads are brimming with gearfags and assholes
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1418
Its really harder and harder to tell if just a white wom*n or a tranny
>>4309010no, worseits bad photography. some people think just centering a non-fat woman in the frame is enough desu. total coombrains.
>>4309004finally something not technically incompetent (framing aside) and objectively hideous (look your photography improves when you drop the troon)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height693
>>4309004>the only non blurry mess is a photo of other photosreally makes you think
>>4309064imagine if OP had started with this one
she looks like she does stinky poos
>>4308391sleep demon
>>4309064Clean your fucking lens or sensor nigga
>>4308391>>4308392>>4308393>>4308488>>4308587>>4308951>>4309006Cool aesthetic and great direction but unfortunately whatever soft lens effect you went for just looks straight up unfocused and amateurAs other anons have said there were better ways to go for soft lensHopefully you don't have a big ego and are willing to to take some of the critique and utilize it to improve
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1468
>>4309399>>4309395>>4309393Ken-sama please update your reviews page
>>4309405I wish he'd update Katie's page.
>>4309407I'd grow katie's family
>>4308518It's a man. Look at the tiny malformed cone titties
>>4308441>Look at leica sample photos for the polar opposite.Provide RAWs comparing the two.I'm willing to bet that you're just some dumb post-process nigger who is seething at someone using different presets or something. Snake oil, it sounds like.Tell me.Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?
>>4309997>Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?Less than vision3 in 35mm.>How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?Very. Pixel level sharpness actually matters unless you're a boomer viewing from the back row. Later generations eschewed the reading glasses for 24/7 corrected vision, that's why we "pixel peep" and want retina displays now.>Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?Digital is not sharp enough. 4x5 = 400mp, foveon.
>>4309006>>4308997>>4308972>>4308955>>4308951>>4308587>>4308493>>4308492>>4308488>>4308401>>4308398>>4308397>>4308394>>4308392>>4308391i would of instantly deleted these photos when sorting my SD cardblur and out of focus looks like shit >nooo i dont want it in focus or it will show all her ugly ass pimples and texturelearn to photoshop, what your doing looks worse
>>4308434>washed out shadows, muted highlights.You mean it has good dynamic range?
>>4309998All 100% legit.Would love to see some objectively sharper Leica lens shots though, I haven't really seen any "sharp" photos that aren't post-processed by either side of the camp.
>>4309998confirmed poser (not even the french spelling)
>>4309004Focus, at fucking last.
>>4309999>would ofwhat does that even mean?
>>4308391>>4308392>>4308393>>4308394>>4308395The problem is not really the composition here, although i guess it's never good to put the model in the center of the photo... But your colours are badly set. I get that you were in a place where there are tons of colours but you should have made a tone choice. It's better in the pics after those first though.
tits
>>4310723or gtfo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1482
>>4311673>>4311674little homoerotic but BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW color palette is attractive
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1385
>>4312736>>4312737>>4312739>>4312750>>4313082>>4313083>>4313084Holy fucking Ken Rockwell. These are awful.
Perfect example of why the raw file is such a finesse.
>>4313109finesse?
>>4313111These are the sort of colors you get when camera companies are allowed to spend zero effort on in camera colors under the guise of:>serious shooters demand complete control over the final image So you get a generation of aspiring photographers pulling the sliders around until they give up and buy a preset pack.
>>4310468Fag
>>4313114>i fag instantly deleted these photos when sorting my SD cardno... doesn't seem like it fits?
>>4313111he is using "finesse" in an obscure way, similar to 'trick' or 'con'. It implies you are being 'finessed' into accepting something you shouldn't.
>>4313112Color is mostly determined by the lensThen the CFA specs and proprietary raw cookingThen by the raw converters settingsThen by the display medium and room lightingImagine if you could not shoot raw. One camera equals one film stock. Not happy? New camera time or gearfag over lens color transmission until the end of time. Also, AWB fucking up? Always. Have fun manually setting white balance all the time. Oh wait thats how fujislug consoomers actually live>omg must buy for the new film sim!
>>4313125all that and it gets worse8 bit color, 10 with limited compatibility, thats itlossy formatbeing stuck with whatever shitty “sharpening” and “chroma/luma nr” the camera maker could fit on the shitty low-power chips that cameras must use in the name of battery lifeif moire or fujiworms happen you are stuck with thatnegative film unironically had more editing latitude and general utility than jpegjpeg = digital is worse than film period. only a fucking retard would accept this trash. 1hr photo automated printing does a better job. all digital photography looks like godawful soulless shit. raw = ok, now digital is as good as consumer 35mm film… if you have like, 36mp, at least. people mostly my age have no idea how much worse the average digital camera is compared to a $15 roll of portra in a cheapo nikon slr
>>4313127Well you know, it's all about the right tool for the job. They want to have pictures of things, while you're out shopping for a personality that'll be like all cool and artsy and special and stuff to sate that desperate need at the core of your being. (Don't worry, it usually sates itself around the mid twenties.)
>>4313136The bitchy insult at the end is an auto-L. Couldnt be more low test if you tried. >dont do things well! dont care! Do the minimim AESTHETICS ARE IMMORALOK enjoy your drab box church, solid black outfit, and phone photos jebediah.
