Doesn't necessarily mean it has to be perfectly rendered (rendered doesn't only apply to 3D, btw), or that you can't post simpler stuff, just that the piece made you think a pro made it. Whether because of its composition, shapes, coloring or the story/concept itself.
>>8218398clothed alt. forgot to mention these are made by "drills3d" aka "d3dstudio"
by fugtrup
>>8218406sorry, wrong version.
>>8218406full res can be found at https://files.catbox.moe/akqyev.png
>>8218406full res: https://files.catbox.moe/k1yuef.png
by moonfacer
>>8218402
>>8218430more like cakefacer
>>8218442Decent composition but the lighting good be better
>>8224822>good be betterwhat?
bump
Anyone got any lighting advice for Blender?
>>8218398Damn, that's really tasteful
>>8236088>>8236106>>8236124>>8236126Sabu>>8236496>>8236505>>8236510>>8236513>>8236529>>8236534Diathorn
>>8235174andrew price's lighting course i think is somewhat decent, here's a link https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjEaoINr3zgH9vCr47kSS5W8PEJBNIiwK
bumpin guud thread
>>8231589have you just been posting that in like... every fucking thread you can
>>8243793I'm definitely not pressed about it, those are some great asses
>>8218398I'm just here to post Princess Bean. No clue if it's artfully made or not.
>>8254409how can you tell if something is artfully made or not?
>>8265909You can't.
