[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/gd/ - Graphic Design
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
Why do so many motion graphics(...) 03/24/24(Sun)13:38:31 No.453722
File: IMG_5467.png (1.77 MB, 1084x1930)
1.77 MB
1.77 MB PNG
Why do so many motion graphics tools copy Cinema4D? Anonymous 03/24/24(Sun)13:38:31 No.453722 Archived
Not a big fan of C4D myself but I have noticed that all the new mograph tools (Spline3D, Cavalry, Fable, UE5) implement a direct copy of C4D’s Cloner/Effector system. Does everyone really find this the most intuitive way to animate or is it just trying to create familiarity?
>>
Anonymous
03/24/24(Sun)17:59:17 No.453727
Anonymous 03/24/24(Sun)17:59:17 No.453727
>>453722
c4D is hardly og warez
prolly copies some other shit
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.