[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


I want one of you to show me how to make low poly model like this. Please show me. Please, please. Please. I want someone to stream and show me. Please. Why the fuck do I have to learn on my own. Please show me.
>>
>>973764
your link doesn't work. Let me guess, it's that dota 2 link that doesn't even apply in this scenario.
>>
>>973768
it works now, yep it's the dota 2 link. You been posting this link for like 3 years now. You post it regardless of context. Regardless of what question is asked.
>h-how do I sculpt?
>*links dota link that doesn't talk about that.
>h-how do I use substance painter?
>*links dota link that doesn't talk about that.


Do you even do 3D?
>>
>>973770
Does he seriously spend 30 hours sculpting that pirate?
>>
>>973770
The OP picture does not use sculpt or baking. There's no reason to sculpt a high poly model. Look at the face, look at the outfit. That's not a high poly model baked onto a low poly model. That's hand painted directly. You are retarded if you think someone has to waste 30 hours sculpting for a low poly model like this. Also links you gave are ugly higher poly characters. You clearly don't have much experience doing 3D if you can't see that the OP picture is entirely texture painted.
>>
>>973783
The fake ambient occlusion looks like it was very quickly added with a soft brush. I think you could replicate those results in about five minutes
I also suspect you could get decent results by texturing the low-poly directly in substance painter. Making an entire sculpt+retopo for that level of detail just seems completely unnecessary
>>
>>973763
https://www.udemy.com/course/learn-3d-with-blender-fundamentals-to-advanced/
>>
>>973787
this sub is so fucking disingenuous, one guy is advertising his udemy course that has nothing to do with topic.

>>973783
It's faster to texture paint the shadow. If you are telling someone to spend 30 hours sculpting just to convert the high poly to low poly. ALL for the sake of shadows, you clearly are either retarded or don't have any experience at all with making a character. The fact that you been linking the dota shit for 6 years, and you didn't even know you could just paint the shadow is depressing.

to think you were the guy who posted a spoonfeed picture, when you literally have dunning kruger. I'm laughing my ass off that I tried asking for advice from people who don't even do 3D. And you clowns are the ones with god complexes.
>>
>>973795
You're retarded man. I put a picture for reference, there's no situation where baking or high poly sculpting is preferable here. How is 30 hours sculpting then retopo to bake. Easier than 5 minutes of texture painting.

You literally have never touched 3D once in your life. Linking shit from 7 years ago. Alzheimers retard who can only repeat the same things regardless of context.
>>
>>973796
>there's no situation where baking or high poly sculpting is preferable here
Baking AO from 3d information (including painted or noise-driven height/normal details) can give you nice results and it's very easy in Blender. Doesn't require any sculpting, just paint on some bump details (if you want) and bake.
For the style of the OP, it's probably overkill, but for something even slightly less low-fi and stylized it would probably give nicer results.
>>
tutorials are slow because youre learning. once you understand it, it will take half the time, maybe less.
Be patient.
>>
>>973789
>this sub
Go back.
>>
>>973813
once you get how modeling works you can just skim through a tutorial in a few seconds
>>
You liked my thread OP?
>>973631
Slightly off-topic but does anyone have more models (or textures and images of them) made by shrapnelsoup? He used to frequent this board and I'm sure someone must've saved his stuff.
>>
>>973763
Whoa those are some bad tits
>>
>>973763
You sound insufferable. Go look up tutorials on YouTube
>>
>>973771
he is streaming it, so mostly a lot of teaching/talking, hell I skimmed it, and he was going on about making a playdough finger to have a scorpion attack it to extract poison.

but in skimming... its like holy shit, he is barely using the program to sculpt, at that point he in all honestly would have been better off getting a base model and then moving over to blender or any other poly modeling program rather than trying to poly model in z brush.
>>
>>973781
its far FAR easier to sculpt an organic thing and then scale back with a remesh than it is to make it ground up from pollies unless you specifically draw it to be modeled.
>>
>>978073
for a model as lowpoly as the one in the op image you definitely do not need to sculpt and remesh and bake etc its very clearly handpainted textures
to remesh it you would be losing so much detail theres literally zero benefit to sculpting and remeshing it all for a baked texture you wont need because op is handpainted
your method would require so much correcting and polymodeling you might as well have just polymodeled it to begin with, massive waste of time
>>
>>973763
I just go here
>https://www.models-resource.com/
and download a model I like and study it, it's topology, it's textures. No fucking industry big wig is going to teach you how to make texture convey form to keep poly counts down, all they know is pixar shit.
>>
>>978075
oh, i'm not saying bake anything, I mean its far easier to shape the body with a sculpt and remesh it, nothing to the level of baking, just enough to get a low poly out of it.especially if you suck or if you are going into it with no model reference images, moving around some 'clay' is far easier than unfucking low poly mesh. then you build up the mesh from the sculpt correctly.
>>
>>973763
Learn To DRAW
>>
>>973763
Download PS1/N64 model rips and study their topology and texturework
>>
>>973763
Shit man low poly like that you can just import a drawing as an image plane and trace the contours with your verts. Easy stuff.
>>
File: GCLrPe_bsAALM0H.png (167 KB, 1280x960)
167 KB
167 KB PNG
>>973763
looks pretty simple to me, and texturing on it would just be dithering & posterization. shadows & highlights are painted in, but there is rimlight and bearly any shadows being cast so its not 100% flat-ly lit.

unironically just try and recreate the model you posted, fuck off this website, and see what you can do with your eyes. get stuck? look it up on youtube

I would recommend picrel for more reference in that type of style but beware, HE is a troon

anybody have an archive of shrapnelsoup's work? seems he deleted everything
>>
>>979106
That's more PS2/3DS-tier than PS1.
>>
What shape are her thighs and arms?
>>
File: Illustration.png (258 KB, 533x749)
258 KB
258 KB PNG
>>980350
probs wrong, but close from what i can tell
>>
File: 1625499437769.gif (1023 KB, 800x800)
1023 KB
1023 KB GIF
>>973763
Better get in on the ground floor before low poly gooning takes off.
>>
>>973763
Show us what you've managed to get on your own.
>>
>>980384
Ive been waiting for people to make games like this for a decade now, still pretty much nothing outside of Froggun and Psuedoregalia
>>
>>973763
I've seen a couple of this guys works on his tumblr before it disappeared. He usually sculpted the models first in Zbrush before making low poly versions of them.
>>
>>973763
>That hand

Look at real low poly from videogames, simple as
>>
>>980384
Now THIS, how do I make models like this? This is way better than OP's image. MML art style is SOUL
>>
>>981137
Here's your learning material, now get to work.
https://www.models-resource.com/playstation/megamanlegends/
https://www.models-resource.com/playstation/megamanlegends2/
>>
>>981182
not that anon, but just looking at the models only goes so far. a lot of these old school models make heavy use of triangles over quads, and it's hard to wrap my brain around em compared to quads

hair is definitely being done differently in that gif compared to the MML models too, since vast majority of MML models build the hair off the head
>>
>>981183
I'm sure whatever software you use has a feature to turn pairs of triangles back into quads without ruining the models, or you could do it by hand. I don't think the artist who made that GIF ever released his models or posted wireframes IIRC, sorry.
>>
File: model.png (84 KB, 798x474)
84 KB
84 KB PNG
>>981183
>model the rest of the fucking owl
>>
>>981137
just learn 256 poly modelling, it's really no different from OP's example. the only thing that makes it distinct is the use of pixel art for the texturing.
>>
>>981182
>No Yuna or naked Sera models
Goddamnit it's been over two decades why haven't all the models from these games been ripped yet?
>>
>>981383
The games make heavy use of overlay binaries, and not only slap code into overlay files, but data too, including raw model formats that use raw pointers, iirc.
Source: I tried decompiling MML1 once.
>>
First attempt at modeling, really not into it..
>>
>>983257
>>
I dont get how you can think this much about low poly models.
its literally the easiest style of models to make.
you can spend time worrying about the exact placement of each polygon.
how could you possibly mess this up?
>>
>>983298
Because it's not as easy as you think, when you have less polygons, your shape abstraction and style matters more, and most 3d modelers suck at that.
That's why low poly modelling is never good as it used to be.
>>
>>983258
nice job on the legs, try to add more definition to the torso
>>
>>983298
I dont get how you can think this much about paintings.
its literally the easiest style of art to make.
you can spend time worrying about the exact placement of each brushstroke.
how could you possibly mess this up?
>>
>>983298
you are clueless
>>
I think I can model just fine, but the hardest part is texturing. A lot of them are hand-drawn and I'm not as good at drawing.
>>
>>983299
>>983339
>>983341
its pretty funny to see how mad people get over a few polygons.
im not saying its easy, but it is significantly easier than doing a detailed sculpt with the whole retopo and baking process.

at any stage in the process you can tweak your shape without having to worry about it, its just very forgiving
>>
>>983372
shit take
>>
>>983410
prove me wrong,
>>
>>983431
Show me 10 different artists that make good low poly right now, not baked textures from high poly.
I can show you 10 good 3d sculptors without a problem.
I make both things, you have probably seen a film with one of my sculptures.
But when I worked on a game company making a mobile game we had to go to Asia for good low poly modelers because of the shit artists produced here.
Hand painted low poly takes shit ton of time to make, and a lot less people can do a good job.
>>
File: 1704183650977447.png (867 KB, 1500x500)
867 KB
867 KB PNG
>>983436
>Hand painted low poly takes shit ton of time to make, and a lot less people can do a good job.
true
>>
>>980294
If you're talking about the man who made those models, he's currently posting on tumblr.
>>
>>983436
What were the problems that western modelers had with making low poly?
>>
>>984051
Sincerely they looked like crap, we gave them concept art and they produced a how to draw manga levels of textures and toned down body proportions. Wasn't even funny how bad it was. The Korean modellers made a perfect job. I know that it was only a bad experience with a western company but still a waste of time and money.
Not everyone can do low poly right and mid poly wasn't an option at that time.
>>
>>984055
Ah interesting, thanks. I wonder if thats due to modelers who went to 3d art schools and only learned how to make assets for AAA slop and never took the time to develop their own skill in other stuff that actually interested them.
>>
>>984056
That company made good high poly game ready assets and characters in a realistic style for that time.
So we went for them because they told us that they made mobile too.
Yes, it was because of the style too, but they never could get the shape right with the low poly density that we needed.
Koreans nailed it at the first time with only a few corrections for the male characters.
Anons are full of bulshit here, both high and low poly need skills and a lot of them overlap, but not all of them.
>>
File: anakin.jpg (77 KB, 800x411)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>978102

I have no 3D experience at all and picked up Blender to make low poly models. I have no direction. Any leads of what I should watch?
>>
>>984865
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn3ukorJv4vuU3ILv3g3xnUyEGOQR-D8J
>>
>>984866
I also found this guy's youtube. I am going to watch the playlist you sent me first and then check his stuff out.

Many blessings.
>>
File: file.png (59 KB, 641x267)
59 KB
59 KB PNG
>>984877
never fucking linked it..

https://www.youtube.com/@StarkCraftsYT/featured
>>
>>979106
>>980325

does this apply to psp era games too?
>>
>>984905
Sure, why not? As long as it's a console where low-poly art is used as a necessity rather than a stylistic choice then you'll have lots to learn from it.
>>
>>984881
I'm on the fence about these ps1 vtubers, some of their stuff can be interesting but I don't know how much you'd really learn if you don't even know how to use blender yet.
>>
>>973763
nearly every single person on twitter who makes "low poly" girls has been drawing for 10 years and just traces over their concept art. absolutely none of them poly model or sculpt
>>
>>984947
I feel like there should be a second sentence in this post explaining why anyone should care or even acknowledge this useless info.
>>
>>980294
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhmJw-XbQu4

For anyone looking for a vid to learn from. Some small clip. Its says 6 hours but 4 of those are just a fucking "we'll be right back" screen



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.