What is the most hated camera brand?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5760Image Height3840Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2019:01:21 15:10:27Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1772Image Height1181
>>4310716perceived wealth breeds jealousy
Whatever the person you're arguing against is using it seems.
We can laugh at leica fags, but they're self aware so we can still get along with themNikon and canon are "just cameras", they get the job doneSnoy is a flawed bargain, i wouldn't buy it but i'm not poor enough to see it as an option eitherHasselblad might be rattly chinese shit but the photos still speak for themselvesPhase one users are invariably godsPentax and olympus users are mythological creaturesProbably fujifilmPragmatically they are overpriced, unergonomic, unreliable, and have poor image quality compared to say, a cnaon r7... or even a lumix gh6, to a point.Socially they are for posers who can not afford the cameras they (poorly) imitateThe company itself discontinued its most beloved products (film stocks)The userbase is about as insufferable and totally lacks self awareness
>>4310737Fujis are just fun go use, i'm gonna put them in the same category as leicas.Trendy and meme tier.
>>4310739No that's olympus cameras, or a pentax with vintage takumarsFujis are like their ugly cousin who tries too hard to look hip but totally lacks soul and charisma.What's missing? The OVF. The last stand of photographic integrity.
most leicalycaptcha: YAYY
>>4310741idk im having as fun with my leica rn as i did with my fuji back then and they both have that nice vintage vibe goin for them[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLeica Camera AGCamera ModelM8 Digital CameraCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 17:03:52Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1009White BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image ID00000000000000000000000000003472
>>4310718>1970s design 50mm f/2>for $2895$2.9k is no where near a product targeted wealthy, unless you're idea is money is from being a NEET. and paying that much for a old and mass produced and still produced design is just laughable. Its not even some rare lens like a Nikon 6mm f/2.8. it a camera and lens for people who wear Supreme branded clothes.
>>4310783>$2.9k is no where near a product targeted wealthyso you have 5 of them?
>>4310783Photography is something of a trailer park hobby. Like electric guitars, motorcycles, and gaming computers>$3k bro. i spent THREE KAY and i can still afford food. i'm the richest bitch in town.nobody should be claiming to be or accusing others of being rich until someone has a phase one xt. financially irresponsible boomers living in coastal double wides and $250k midwestern mcmansions bought in 2015 spend more on harleys and boats.
Probably Canon because it's the most popular among normalfags and therefore most likely to draw actual hate. Fuji and Sony hate on /p/ isn't representative of the wider community.
>>4310797At $14,500 you're still short of the msrp of a harley fat bobMaybe you think everyone is totally buying these in cash. well actually, if someone is single and works a shit job that allows infinite overtime they can spend that much in cash too. How do you think reddit got their reputation for consooming?>Have shitty entry level job>Do not have children>Infinite money hack zomg time for moar nintendos
>>4310716fuji. they hate their customer base. has no prestige like leica does (for some people) and fuji's entire market is selling double or triple over priced turds with years old sony tech in them in a larp retro format. with the new nikon ZF there is zero reason to ever want one now. and the user base are cancerous white and asian geek losers.
>>4310802you could have just said no instead of typing all that shit
>>4310805Sorry bud, but it's just not "rich person stuff".I don't have five because they're fucking stupid. Not because I can't afford it. But because they're fucking stupid, and I will gladly tie up 100% of every dollar that comes in with recurring investment account transfers rather than live like the masses of childless, futureless apartment dwelling blue collar losers that pack 4reddit gear-hobby boards like /g/, /o/, and /p/ and endlessly buy shit for EDC/battlestation threads and larping as rich.
>>4310807all gearfag consoomers are the same>SO BUYING BAGS OF SHIT DOESNT MAKE ME RICH? SO YOU HAVE FIVE BAGS OF SHIT?>t. 30 year old khv with a glow in the dark gaming computer on cameras/anime dolls/dildos/computers/anime girl jpegs in his phone game/watches/pens/insert anything that is guaranteed to repel pussy
>>4310807>>4310808its just a lens
>>4310807>>4310808The consoomers have been seen for what they are>>4310811Keep playing dumb consoomerThere exist between the rich and the poor, the paypigs. They could be rich, but their steady consoomption keeps them where they are, like livestock in a profit farm.
>>4310807>the masses of childless, futureless apartment dwelling blue collar losers that pack 4reddit gear-hobby boards like /g/, /o/, and /p/ and endlessly buy shit for EDC/battlestation threads and larping as rich.fucking REKT. nailed it
>>4310811>its just a funko popkek
>>4310716Whatever brand has the most obnoxious astroturfing at time? Real people get the tools they need and can afford without bothering to hate tools they choose to not have.
>>4310716probably sigma with foveon raw
>>4310807over for gearfags
>>4310820But we’re manly men here so we have a such thing as a bad/useless/overpriced tool and dont recognize feelings as a use that trumps that unless it is approved form of funThere are only three objectively correct ways to have fun hereGoing into the woodsShooting large format filmPretending to agree with cANON
>>4310797I have a Nikon 500 f/5.6 which is more and I bought it on a whim for the eclipse. I'm certainly not wealthy, just a wagie. You just sound like a NEET if you think a $2.9k lens is reserved for the wealthy.
>>4310876the young male section of the internet is totally overrun with this hood rich mentality where single men living alone pull $600 net a week at their low tier job and suddenly think they can afford anything>$2400 a month bitch! i buy 5 leicas a year!
what kind of autistic idiot would hate a brand? like fuck you for producing these products lmao my purchase
I'd say Canon DSLRs which were once the most praised are the most hated.
>>4310716its hard for me not to be hater when i see these things sat neatly on a perfectly clean desk looking brand new. i shoot a digital M but i don't treat it like a baby's ass. i shoot it almost every day and it looks very used. the chrome plating wears off a little bit and it takes a few dings and it looks awesome[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS-1D XCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2084Image Height2083Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution110 dpiVertical Resolution110 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2017:01:20 15:20:43Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width764Image Height764RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4310774i see your m8 and i raise you an m9 monochrom. greatest digital camera ever made[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:
>>4310802>harley fat bobokay dad
>>4310737>didn't even remember the Panasonic userswhat does this say about them?
>>4311156I almost forgot about the panny boi. They used to be straight up shit but now autofocus are getting better, even better than canon's and almost as good as snoy's.
outside of /p/, Nikon for sure. basically a bunch of sheep influenced by influencers on social media to jump on the Snoy bandwagon and trash cameras that can’t do work for them. it’s like a cult following at this point>b-but muh autofocussounds like a skill issue to me. people were taking crisp photos with film and DSLR both of which didn’t have the autofocus capabilities of today’s mirrorless
>>4311288>sounds like a skill issue to meif this were true then pentax would be a viable brand
>>4311297But Pentax is a viable brand
I have the options of having a K1000 Pentax or a B200 Praktica
>>4311303sorry, didn't notice we had switched to talking about film cameras
>>4311557Pentax
>>4310737>Probably fujifilm>Pragmatically they are overpriced, unergonomic, unreliable, and have poor image qualityThis. I thought people who owned them were kidding when they were "celebrating" their unique images. The shadow detail is crushed and the colours are dulled. The glass is only okay and the ergonomics of the cameras is dogshit.
Fujifilm are definitely most hated on this board but I find Sony shooters the most insufferable, vapid cunts going.
>>4312000Sony fags are the unevolved form of fujislugs. Once they become "serious photographers" (start watching street photowalk videos and imitating them instead of doing zach snaps) they switch to fujifilm. The cameras even break equally often! But they trade vignetting correction banding for worms and zombie colors.If they become real photographers (service industry by day, hobby shooting on a weekend) they migrate to canon or nikon. You'll notice this discrepancy between market share and use among actual photographers - market share is 1: Canon 2: Sony 3: Nikon and use in serious photographic communities and among pros is 1/2: Canon/Nikon 3: Sony 4: Phones 5: Fujifilm 6: Micro four thirdsYou too can be a fujislug, but without buying a fuji. Here's how:Buy a nikon ZFBuy a 26mm f2.8Set ZF to DX modeInstall capture one and topaz gigapixel AIRescale DX images to 24mp, open in capture oneCrank color noise reduction and moire reduction up even if there is nothing wrong with the image until it looks dull, especially redsTurn "detail" up a bit until you get wormsNow you have a fuji
>>4310716It used to be lomography, but honestly after seeing these fucks all trying to be something theyre not, i think lomo is just fine doing their lo-fi art shot experimentation thing.
>>4310737I bought a phase 1 about a decade ago and try to take it out shooting in the world. That was a big fucking mistake because as it turns out that camera is a studio camera that eats an entire battery pack in about three shots before the camera circuit boards just quit because of temperature or movement or fear of loud noises or whatever, and you have to be some kind of jackass to take it out in the elements and try to get some fucking artiste shots with it. And if you disagree with this, the staff at phase 1 will disavow you of your delusions quite expertly.
>>4311557I do love my Praktica B200 like you wouldn't believe it, but I have to admit that is not made to the standard of the older ones, also even for a film mount PB is dead, if its your first film camera the K1000 will probably be a better choice.
>>4312038or just buy a panasonic, i got worms on my lx100 just as easily as with my fuji[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-LX100Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:02:21 15:57:15Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length34.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width868Image Height868RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessSoft
>>4310716Whatever you useAnd mine is the best
>>4312134ive been taking photos for years with fuji cameras and i have no idea what this is. my darktable processed imgaes do not look like this, my capture one images did not look like this
>>4312681There actually was an issue with Lightroom which was fixed several aeons ago... but we all know /p/.
>>4312681it happens if you excessively oversharpen the image on some programs, i use camera raw/lightroom which is where most ppl say it happens.
fuji or sony but i personally find boomers and gen x more annoying so sony
>>4312683>>4312681a single lightroom release in 2016
>>4313526naw bro it happens in my 2018 release of camera raw as well so its not just one release
>>4311154pyw
>>4312683There still is. Sooc jpeg: soft, zombie colorsProcessing foolji raws in any program: a wait, for sure. Why do they take so much longer to load?
>>4310716Fuji simply because they suck. Its a rare case where there is a such thing as bad gear and a pricy camera actually has worse IQ - such things have been unknown since the death of the canon DSLR. Fujifags seethe hard about nice gear too, like they think good image quality is a bad thing and you shouldnt even have the option. They are all aged 20-30 and do not know that most film is significantly higher resolutiom than an xt5 because all they ever saw was walmart 4x6s
>>4310716fuji for surelooking at brands in terms of general "why would I not use them" points, can think of the most for fuji, but i can also think of a lot of niche "why would I use them" pointsthey're really only ideal for a very specific set of niche preferences, and sub-optimal for mostother brands feel like their better general purpose options, or have 1-2 clear usage casesthe mass normie popularity (and inventory issues) probably gives a sour grape feel to people who might otherwise be ideal users, similar to leicadefinitely seems to inspire the most hate here for sure, its just a shame people cant be honest about the faults without exaggerating or relying on more dubious criticismspretty crazy how much the sentiments have changed though, they used to be seemingly universally liked, even herestill one of my favorite brands to use though, but most people are better off looking elsewhere