Why do scientists brazenly maintain this antiquated model of Earth's core?
>>16137023Cause it looks like a jawbreaker and those are delicious.
>>16137023its an approximation, like bohr's atom. It isnt wrong, just not precise
Hollow earth is such fascinating theory - a whole new world, ecosystem, maybe even civilization. Far superior to flat earth which is just thinly veiled religious screeching. Hollow earthers are much more trustworthy because they don't have ulterior motives and simply want to have fun.
>>16137080Fixed overhead inner sun gets old real fast though.
>>16137023What do you mean? I don't understand your image.
>>16137023yeah i guess there is a massive ocean of liquid metal near the core
>>16137271That's what the official Science(tm) says. The official narrative is that the inner core is solid but the outer core is liquid metal, mostly iron and nickel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_outer_coreSo what's the contention?
>>16137271>>16137273The ocean they are talking about isn't the outer liquid core.>This underground water supply rests some 400 miles (700 km) beneath our feet. Notably, this find could help explain the origin of our planet's water. Specifically, it may help us determine where Earth's seas came from.>It is important to note that the water resides inside a blue rock called "ringwoodite." This rock exists in the mantle of our planet, which is the layer of hot rock between Earth's surface and its core. This means that the newly discovered "ocean" isn't a vast reservoir of churning blue water. Instead, the water is contained (trapped) in the molecular structure of minerals that is found within Earth's mantle rock.
>>16137023Serious question: why doesn’t the water in the ocean work its way through cracks down to the inside of the earth?
>>16137636Theres water inside the earth, below the ocean.Basically water doesnt like to be there, because it turns into steam, and it tries to work its way up since gas flows up.
>waltuh, wah uh..
>>16138958It still tries to find its way up, even by random convection it does, same as natural gas.
>>16137636it most certainly does. Rocks have large faults and microscopic fractures, cavities and pores, and water seeps through them, everywhere, including deep into the crust, waaaaay the fuck down there, far below the ocean.Not just that those rocks then dive into the mantle, when the oceanic crust is subducted below continental crust, and that water, in those rocks, gets dragged down with it. As a matter of fact, there are metamorphic rocks that can only form under those circumstances of tremendous pressure, heat, and water.- a geologist :)
>>16137630>The oceanit's not an ocean like the surface ocean, it's just a huge amount of water locked in the rocks.see:>>16139561
>>16137023>antiquatedThough the diagram has no scale to verify the dimensions, structure-wise, that is how the core is layered, yes. (as best as we can tell with our instrumentation, obviously)
>>16137023They know they can say whatever they want about the Earth core because they know for certain that they will never been disproved since the deepest boreholes don't even go down 15 miles.
>>16139864If it was wrong you could analyze the seismic data yourself and do the math
>>16137630they literally say it in the title, ocean NEAR earth's core. the title and underground "oceans" are brainrot
>>16137023Read Baxter's hard sci-fi books Ark and Flood. He used the early papers predicting the sub crustal ocean in Flood to get enough sea level rise for the plot. All the melted ice on Earth only gave him about 1/4 the sea level rise the plot needed so in his story earthquakes crack the crust and allow the sub crustal ocean to leak to the surface and give us 400+ feet of sea level rise.
>>16137723>Theres water inside the earth, below the ocean.Water dissolving and water removingThere is water at the bottom of the oceanUnder the water, carry the waterRemove the water from the bottom of the oceanWater dissolving and water removing
>>16141357>vibrations travelling through something is a fallacy and has been disprovedMental retardation
>>16139887>If it was wrong you could analyze the seismic data yourself and do the matAll you have is a scientific model to explain the behavior of waves. It the observations of waves fit the theory of waves, then its scientifically true. However you will never have direct evidence of what the earth is really like, just indirect through its effect on waves.
>>16137080>agartha schizos are back on the menu
>>16137047Science should be based on more delectable models. For example, I really love the physics idea of spaghettification.
>>16143620>welcome to Agartha, bitch
>>16143465>It will be centuries before anyone penetrates even 100 miles down, let a lone seeing whats going on in the core.And until then soience will be dishonestly claiming they know exactly whats going on down there, because thats how soientists earn their living, by lying.
>>16137023>>16139565By the way, the "ocean" isn't what you're imagining: it's just water locked microscopically within fractures and rock pores. However, the volume of rock we're talking about is so large, that the amount of water locked down there is enormous, on the sale of oceans.In regards to the life down there: well, microbes can penetrate and live deep in the rocks within those said fractures and pores. Again, the volumes of rocks we're talking about are planetary-scale, so the total mass of all those lifeforms is huge.How do we know this? We find life in rocks we drill from deep down there, and they're not contaminants from the surface since they are species of microbes which we simply cannot find alive on the surface, they can only survive under the conditions found down there.
>>16144707>claiming they know exactly whats going on down therewrong, these are theories, some even still hypotheses, all earth sciences know this, myself included, so get off your arrogant high horse, smart ass.
Hmm, I wonder if I can blame this on the Jews somehow
>>16137723Water also becomes Incorporated in the chemistry of the rock. Just look at what happens to the subduction of oceanic crust under neath the continental crust
>>16144925Supercritical H2O doesn't behave like normal water
>>16141561>sound is fakeGreat hypothesis, can't wait for your paper and evidence
>>16147575the people who claim they know whats in the center of the planet have no idea what they're talking about, that has already long since been proved. you only still believe them because you're an irrational soiyentism religious cultist
>>16137080Why does earth need to be hollow for an underground civilization to exist? There are huge cave systems still being discovered to this day.
>>16148293You don't have to look inside a bottle to know it's filled with water when you know exactly how much it should weigh and what its properties are, most information is directly extrapolatable from other known behaviours of observed things.
>>16137023Mind discussing your up-to-date and correct model them? I'm all ears.
>>16150757And I can guarantee that other substance has a different chemical makeup and atomic lattice which would give it different properties
>>16137080>>16143620An ancient civilization at the center of the earthWhere mister Hitler waits for the Reich’s next birth
>>16144925>How do we know this? We find life in rocks we drill >from deep down thereWe don't drill that far. We barely pierce the crust; these water-infused rocks are beyond the mantel near the core.
>>16150822I thought he was on the south pole, on the moon.
>>16137080>Hollow earth is such fascinating theory - a whole new world, ecosystem, maybe even civilization. Far superior to flat earth which is just thinly veiled religious screeching. Hollow earthers are much more trustworthy because they don't have ulterior motives and simply want to have fun.This conspiratard meme is sponsored by King Kong vs Godzilla
>>16151275The "rocks" down there don't have pores, they're liquid and the "water" is supercritical H2O
>>16150774such as?
>>16154248Are you retarded? If it isn't water it's something else, which means it would react differently to any experiments you might subjugate it to, because different elements react differently to different things, who would've guessed.
>>16155766I'm sorry you didn't go to school but that doesn't apply for all of us.
>>16137271I read the subcore is an 8 mile diameter of "crystallized nickel silicide".
>>16154248conductivity. Based on the element's electronegativity and valence electrons.
>>16155926>crystallized nickel silicide is a class of intermetallic compounds that are formed by the reaction of nickel and silicon at high temperatures. They have unique properties, such as low electrical resistivity and high thermal stability, and are used in a variety of applications, including microelectronics, electrical contacts, wear-resistant coatings, and structural components.Cool. Earths core is probably generating 10,000 gigawatts every second.
>>16137080These are not theories they are hypothesis because there's no evidence for it
>>16156988
>>16155947You can make up whatever soience stories you want about the Earth's core since you know nobody will ever see it in your lifetime. Maybe its made out of dark matter.
>>16158667>NOOOOOOO, ITS MADE OUT OF BLACK HOLES!!!!>I CAN SENSE IT IN THE VIBRATIONS!!!>YOU'VE GOT TO BELIEVE ME!!!!!>TRUST THE SOIYENCE!!!!
>>16137023Because scientists are all fundamentally dishonest people
>>16137023Prove that it's not correct. I'll be waiting, OP.
>>16137023>>16137047imagine believing in jawbreaker earth theory
using seismometers to map the earth's core is akin to using divining rods to map groundwater, both are just dumb voodoo tier superstitions that only an idiot could be tricked by
>>16137023yeah man why isnt it actually inside out and filled with cum ?
>I KNOW EXACTLY WHATS AT THE CENTER OF THE EARTH!!>MUH VIBRATIONS!!but also >predict earthquakes or volcanic eruptions? no i can't do that, can't even get close so that pretty much proves they have no idea what they're talking about and all of the knowledge they brag about are just empty guesses. if they really knew how the planet was constructed they would be able to predict earthquakes
>>16137023Does "Earth" even have an "inside"? Probably not.
>>16163470Saying you can predict an earthquake or volcanic eruption is like saying you could predict how many pieces of glass a vase shattered into if you took that vase, locked it in a shipping container and dropped it into the middle of the ocean.you'd have to have extremely precise, large-scale observations of interactions between continental plates at an almost molecular level throughout tens or hundreds of square kilometres of rock pressed tightly up against other, barely distinguishable rock, all of which is happening hundreds of metres or even kilometres underground. it's a wonder that we get any warning at all.
An ocean of lava yes
>>16137049>It isn't wrongCan you please show me the scientific proof of this claim? I was not aware we have gone down to the core so we could make this claim. I'm eager to see the evidence you surely have
>>16164462Just like how a change in transparent material causes light to be bent, the same happens for sound waves. in this case, when an earthquake happens, very minor shocks can be detected all over the planet, since the shockwave can travel through the planet. but if there are layers in the earth with significantly different properties, youd expect the shockwave to be bent when in travels in, which is exactly what happens, meaning we can make an educated guess at what the density and composition are of whatever is down there if we do the math on how much the waves were refracted, as well as how thick the layer is.
>>16137023Who cares what's in this gay ass core anyway, its not like we can get there.
>>16164601I've been there thoughever.
>>16164593Well golly, anon, consider me stumped. I thought decades of observations, evidence and rock solid peer reviewed papers was going to be difficult to disprove, but if some retard on 4chan going "nuh uh" is enough to overturn centuries of research, I just don't know what to believe anymore. maybe I'll pick up fascism and start saying jews are lying about science for no reason.
>>16166369Climate is not weather, anon. I can say that 100 years from now, just about half of any chunk of nickel-63 will have decayed into another material, but that doesn't mean i can predict whether someone will find a hunk of it lying on a bench in some lab and throw it in some kind of industrial-strength rock blender.
>>16147558And how the FUCK are you gonna have life in hot supercritical water?
>>16166601Extremophiles have lived in worse. Only place on earth that we can't find life is in the dallol hot springs, which are fascinating in their own right, I'm personally obsessed with the danakil depression in general. highly recommend reading up about it a little.
>>16161581Still waiting on that proof, OP.
Is there a reason we don't just make a large scale digging operation or is just that nobody really cares? I can see how space exploration presents many technological obstacles but digging a giant hole not so much.
>>16166571Climate is an average of weather. Weather systems are full of extremely complicated feedback loops. If you can't model the feedback loops well enough to model weather beyond a few days, how can you predict an average of weather 100 years hence?Climate modelling is an inherently unscientific endeavour because the models are unfalsifiable in our lifetimes.Every model that purports to "recreate" or "predict the current climate from a past starting point" have been arcanely manipulated to fit a very narrow timeframe of observations, but then become rapidly unreliable as soon as they get more than a few years into the future, mirroring how we can forecast the weather a few days in advance thanks to our crude weather models which we can plug recent weather observations into. They work a little bit, but the errors and deficiencies in the model rapidly multiply as soon as you deviate from observation.This isn't a resolution problem with the models either. It's not something that is or can be improved with higher resolution models - higher models actually multiply the uncertainties because they increase the number of interacting parts.Consider a weather or climate model that uses air cells of 100km x 100km. To some extent we can simplify the behaviour within each cell, and each cell affects the behaviour of adjacent cells on the next time slice. If you "improve" the model with a reduction in cell size of 10kmx10km, then the behaviour within each individual cell MIGHT be modelled more accurately (though this isn't guaranteed), but you've now got 10x as many cell interactions, with all the concomitant errors accumulating with every interaction.
>>16166682Still waiting on that proof, OP.
>>16167557I think someone needs to catch up on what technology can do. A blur function in excel literally predicts all particle interactions and life. I am sure we can model the climate.
>>16168601??? NTA but the kola borehole did not come even close to hitting the bottom of the crust, how did any of its findings contradict our model of earth's layers?
>>16167969lollmao even
>>16169913Every day I'm reminded just how braindead the denizens of this fucking board are and I have to thank you for not letting me forget
>>16166620Wiki page says they found life there
>>16170145Ah, that's news to me. After reading the study, though, it sounds less like they found life in the pools and more like they found life living inside hollow mineral deposits thar happened to be in the pools. that doesn't mean that those organisms can survive direct exposure to the pools' contents.
>>16170095the soience you memorized out of your school textbooks and took on faith is completely wrong
>>16171772Heresy!
>>16171772>t. chronic contrarian
>>16141561Hey I actually worked at a seismological laboratory, and it seems you have some doubts about seismic waves and its propagation through the earth. How can I help you?
>>16143465>nobody has any way of disproving their claimsthat's not true, there are competing ideas in seismology and they too get put to the test; some turn out to be WRONG, meaning that you too are so.
>>16144707>claiming they know exactly whats going on down thereNo, they do not. All geoscientists know that these are MODELS.
>>16145952>Those theories are based on ideas that have been disprovedNo, the current models rest on ideas not yet disproven.
>>16161561I'm serious
>>16162568not really, it's based on the knowledge of seismic wave propagation, which is already quite well understood since you can study it in labs and even observe it near the surface. Unfortunately, it's the only technology we have to prove so deep into the earth, for now.
>>16163965you can predict volcanic eruptions, yes. Obviously, not a decade in advance, but a few days, maybe weeks, it's possible and it has been done in places like Iceland and Hawaii.Earthquakes, for now, still unpredictable, as far as I know, but we do know where they tend to happen and how often they tend to happen, which in a way is an accurate "prediction", though not temporally precise at all.
>>16164593>Every time a new deep borehole is drilled, whats observed at the deepest depths is contrary to what the (((experts))) have claimed they would find.as a professional geologist, believe me, you are wrong. The deeper we have probed, the more pressure we found in the rocks and the higher the temperature.These sources you are putting your faith on, I wouldn't anon, I wouldn't.
>>16165280
>>16167503Russia drilled to about 15km before the project ended. That's it, that's the deepest ever.The only other way we find samples of rocks from deeper still is either through volcanism, or tectonics/erosion.
>>16169913>the predictions made by muh soience were completely wrong.What exactly do you mean by this, was the rock cold? Was the surrounding rock not under extreme pressures?
>>16170145>thereNot at the mantle-core boundary, no.
>>16173724>to proveto probe*apologies
>>16173725I defer to you, seismologist-anon. I feel like i was probably tired when i claimed that volcanic eruptions are unpredictable, lol. It's hard to imagine having a way to accurately predict earthquakes even a day ahead of time, though. maybe putting infrasound detectors right on top of the fault, as well as drilling a borehole into the fault to have more accurate seismograph stations? those have probably already been done, though.Vaguely adjacent question: Do you think "earthquake lights" are real, or are they just transformers exploding?
>>16173743That anon was talking about the hydrothermal pools at the dallol hydrothermal system. You probably already know how cool it is, but look it up anyway.
>>16173853In regards to earthquake prediction research, AI is looking very promising:>the AI algorithm correctly predicted 70% of earthquakes a week before they happenedhttps://phys.org/news/2023-10-ai-driven-earthquake-trials.htmlAs far as earthquakes lights, they are real, we just don't know exactly what's going on yet, though we have some ideas proposed, but it's not like we can set up an experiment for the next earthquake because well, we don't know where and when they will next happen, but as seen above, that might be changing very soon. We'll see.
>>16137023they abuse the peer review process to gatekeep anyone who disagrees with them. that way they never have to admit they're capable of being wrong about anything
>>16176147Reminds me of the Galileo trial. Modern science is the same as those inquisitioners, anyone who disputes the mainstream conventional wisdom gets excommunicated
>>16176853Part of the reason religious cult brainwashing works is that the victims have sunk cost fallacy over the lies they've memorized. This effect is particularly bad in the soientism religion
>>16137023Because they know they can spin whatever grandiose lies they want so long as they control the peer review process.
>>16139561Imagine riding along with the water molecules over thousands of years
>>16137023I am very surprised no-one has mentioned oil yet.Without starting a flame war, what are the implications?
>>16180002Oil is extracted from rock at depths below 5km by various gases and fluids which in a supercritical state at the depth, it works the same way supercritical solvent extraction does in laboratories, the solvent releases its extract ones the pressure on the solvent becomes low enough that it can no longer maintain the supercritical state.
>>16137023>Why do scientists brazenly maintain this antiquated model of Earth's core?The two articles you listed don't contradict the model...Yes, for many kilometers below the earth's surface there are micro-organisms living in rocks in very low concentrations. Also there is a tiny amount of water in almost all rocks. There are even pockets of super-pressurized water, air etc.No it isn't literally an inverted ocean and amazon forest inside the Earth you dumb fuck.Low concentrations of life deep in the Earth can easily exceed that at the surface because you're comparing huge amounts of volume with just the two dimensional surface of the Earth.This is the same reason for why the most common fish in the ocean is a deep-sea bioluminescent fish. Although there is a far greater concentration of fish at the sea's surface a large volume of deep sea low concentration easily out-numbers it.The fish are the Cyclothones.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyclothoneLooks like the OP's in /sci/ are just as stupid as the OP's in any other board.
>>16181008>The two articles you listed don't contradict the model...yes they do
>>16181976>yes they doNo they don't.Please explain how they do.I've just explained why they don't.Please use your own brain and explain yourself.
>>16182066It does. The oceans emerged from inside the earth.
>>16184050No they didn't. the "oceans" they discovered are water trapped on a molecular level inside rocks. the ocean floor emerged from inside the earth though, a fact which supports the current model. almost all water on earth came from comets.
>>16151279The South Pole is the conduit between the cores of the Earth and Luna - which itself holds an atmosphere and it's own native wildlife.
>>16185356>be empiricist>demand psychical, observable, and even testable evidence from anyone making a claim >proceed to believe fantastical notions about history with no empirical basiswtf is their problem?
>>16185356Where do you think earth's water came from, then? Do you think it was just a big blob floating around in space? you do know that water freezes in space, and that a big chunk of frozen water flying around in space with a little bit of dust is basically what a comet is, right?
>>16187541>i'm a soiyence expert cause i watched the black soiyence man tv show
>>16186798Registered.
>>16185531They just like the feeling of pretending they get to determine if something is reasonable or not. It's understandable.Obviously it's wrong and self-annihilating too but it definitely scratches the reddit itch
>>16185531popsci makes them believe a lot of stupid things
>>16188521Just say where you think earth's water came from, if not from comets.
>>16189229i dont wanna discuss soience since its ickky. jesus created water so that white people could drink it
>>16137080That's right Heil Hitler btw
>>16189233>jesus created water so that white people could drink itthis but unironically >>16190071>Heil Hitler this but unironically
Hey, someone who actually looked at the articles here. OP seems to somehow be implying that legitimate scientists are publishing papers that brazenly support hollow earth and yet criticizing them for also not believing it. Showing both news articles here is misleading.The first one says "ocean" in quotes because it's being dramatic. It's reporting on seismic findings that there's a chunk of stuff matching ringwoodite's density in the mantle, which is a rock that can contain water, thus a metaphorical ocean. There's a lot more volume under the earth than on its surface, so there's room for enough water mixed in with rock to together have more volume than the surface water, which is what they suggest.Original article: https://futurism.com/scientists-discover-massive-ocean-near-earths-core3657686Original paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024493716301360The second article has an image of microorganisms because that's what it's referring to. It doesn't cite a particular paper, but it covers various findings from digging a few km down (still in the crust) and looking at the microbes they find there. "Deep Earth" is somewhat misleading, at least in this context: the rest of the article mostly uses "deep biosphere", as in the deepest parts of where we see life (which is apparently about 5km into the earth, but life in oceans gets deeper). The article also over-hypes some findings, like "the genetic diversity of life... is comparable to or exceeds that of above the surface", which probably means they don't really know, but the microbes' DNA varied about the same amount, and the scientists want to get paid.Original article: https://phys.org/news/2018-12-life-deep-earth-totals-billion.htmlBasically, neither of the articles represent scientists supporting hollow earth because neither of them are about that at all, and their conclusions use the normal model of the earth.
>>16190942>OP seems to somehow be implying that legitimate scientists are publishing papers that brazenly support hollow earthno he isn't
>>16192118Wall of text posts are invariably stupid, don't bother reading them
>>16137023>I know whats at the center of the Earth >Prove me wrongwhat a stupid useless branch of science, why can't they do something useful like learn how to predict earthquakes?
>>16193840Read the thread, dumbass.
>>16143620I think the best thing about agartha is that it could exist. Old scholars all retreating from society to focus on metaphysics, all conglomerating at some hard to reach geographically geometric point. Then they make an enclave that retreats from society as society encroaches by going underground. It's a society of rotating populations of new scholars that find it, and it's secreted away controlling the world and advancing technology. It's like a pleasant illuminati that would accept you if you're smart enough to find them. It's peak modern myth.
>>16193840They don't have any useful abilities, thats why they put so much effort into publishing nonscientific pilpul. If they had useful abilities then they would be doing something useful with their lives other than spamming garbage into academic journals that nobody reads
>>16193840if they could figure out how do that then they wouldn't publish it, they'd patent the method and sell it to the highest bidder, probably an insurance company, so that it could be exploited for maximum profit.
>>16150822Based hyperborea thread poster
>>16156018Theres tons of observational evidence that geologists models of the Earth are completely wrong
>>16198346there is no observational evidence that geologists' models of earth's deep regions are correct
>>16137023>Why do scientists brazenly maintain this antiquated modelIf "scientists" are sticking with the old model, then who came up with the new one?In other words, who does your Wojak actually represent?
>>16193840Because they're too stupid to do something like that, best they can do is publish useless fake theories and suck each other's cocks via the peer review circlejerk
>>16193840>I know what our models predict is at the center of the Earth with the best data that we can gatherFTFY
>>16199698that doesn't make any less useless wasteful or stupid
>>16167557>going from 100x100 to 10x10 cells increases the number of interactions by 10fucking kek, the absolute state of poo math
>>16200310>understanding planet Earth better is useless, wasteful and stupid
>>16190746Who said I was being ironic (I wasn't)?
>>16164462As an addendum to >>16164557, I think the magnetic properties of earth, as well as the drift of its magnetic poles and occasional inversion, only make sense if a liquid ferromagnetic core exists. But as the other anon said, it's a model, it's only as precise as it needs to explain whatever observations you want to explain.
>>16201703>their dumb models can't even accurately predict the heat, pressure, composition and plasticity in rock 10km downBut they're totally sure they know what its like 100km down or 1000km down.
>>16201703>act like pompous know it alls and how how to get their lies through the peer review processmanage your own subjective experiences, please. Let's stick to facts>their dumb models can't even accurately predict the heat, pressure, composition and plasticity in rock 10km downwhat are you referring to? can you show us an example?
>>16202063>totally suresee:>>16199698Knowing what the models say is not "totaly sure" about what is going on.It's your fault if you interpret theories as fact.
>>16202265literally every borehole thats ever been drilled to that depth. you've never even taken a single geology class, yet you're leaping to the defense of the science as if you certain you know what you're talking about. why? why fake it like that when you zero knowledge of this topic?
>>16137080>>16156018>More mass more gravity/gravitational influence>In the center of earth the gravity is "0" because the crust around it is the mass and it cancels itself out>So if there's no gravity at the center, how can there be mass?
>>16203025>literally every borehole thats ever been drilled to that depth.Still waiting for you to show us that evidence that at the bottom of any 10km+ deep borehole the temperatures and pressures do not increase as our models show. Models which are based, and constantly improved, on the conditions which we have found at those depths over the many centuries that we have been digging and drilling into the Earth.>why fake it like that when you zero knowledge of this topic?Well, not only have I taken geology classes, I have a degree in geology, have worked in geo laboratories, and taught classes.Pic not relevant, just some eye candy for the thread.
>>16203744>the burden of proof is on yousissy emotional discussion style, you're trying to win an argument and in the process you're resisting learning about geology. look it up yourself, you know where to since you're such an expert.
>>16203805are you going to show me evidence for your claim or not?:>their dumb models can't even accurately predict the heat, pressure, composition and plasticity in rock 10km downI'm waiting
>>16203868read up about boreholes anywhere you like, they all produced results that disproved the stupid irrational theories of academics
>>16205267>read up about boreholes anywhere you likeOh, I have, countless times, it was my job.Back up your claims, somehow, a link, anything, of STFU.
>>16137023>there's an amazing amount of life in the Earth's crust>there's also "water" trapped in minerals in the mantle>EVERYTHING WE KNOW IS A LIE>>>/x/ you barely literate moron. >>16137080>Hollow earth is such fascinating theoryNo it's not, you capeshit addicted, sóy guzzling redditor.
