Who is your favorite scientist?
For me, it's Pasteur
>>16168270https://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/en/institut/news/wed-02142024-1200/on-the-death-of-dr-ingeborg-levin
>>16168327Louis Pasteur was a lying fraud who tortured animals for fun.
>>16168327Based choice.
Probably Richard Feynman or Carl Sagan. Not because of their great scientific contributions, but because they were cool as fuck. Ranked purely by greatness I'd say someone like Darwin, Newton, or Aristotle.
>>16168327Germaphobia is a disease
Probably Robert Koch. Discovered the cause of tuberculosis and was a weeaboo.
Albert
>>16168270Neil Smokin deGrasse Tyson
>>16168270Woodward for his autistically super clean molecule structure drawing ability.Sanger for being down to earth excelent experimentalist.Darwin for his writting ability coupled with focus and clear reasoning.
>>16168270Ed Witten and Terrence Tao are the one who can cure all the psuedo scientists and frauds posted in this thread, including OP pic.
Does Tesla count?
>>16168270>>16168288>>16168424>>16168515What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall in a room where these four are having a conversation.
>>16168288ALL HAIL THE CHICKENHEAD STRIPPER!
>>16169641the first would assert her dominance over the other three. she is not a good physicist but she is highly aggressive and unstable
>>16170911twum wouldn't let that little bitch dominate her
>>16168270Left or right doesn't matter, people with chud phenotype always have extremist ideas.
>>16168270Trofim LysenkoLaid the groundwork for making science subservient to political necessity. Without which, we would not have a climatic crisis.
>>16168288literally who
>>16171598>children inheriting characteristics built by parents in their lifetime.based af. Russians were ahead of the curve. the westoid tranny soientists now revisiting this idea like it's something groundbreaking they invented.
>>16171605>the westoid tranny soientists now revisiting this idea like it's something groundbreaking they invented.are you talking about the "generational trauma" bullshit?
myself
>>16171600/scipol/ meme akin to Jacob Barnett, but now with racism
>>16171632whats wrong about racism?
>>16171697Racism is skub and /pol/ is cancer.
>>16171703
>>16171722gb2 stormfront
>>16171728How come you can't explain whats wrong with racism? I sure hope you're not just irrationally bigoted against people who look out for their own kind. Not everyone is as self centered as you are, some people care about their families and their race, not just themselves.
>>16172811>some people care about their familiesyes>and their racelol no what a bitchAnyway, fuck off back to pol where you belong, election tourist permanewfag.
>>16172914Since you can't explain whats wrong with racism, how come you presume that racism is an irrational belief?Is your dislike for racism something thats strictly an emotional urge for you?Your race is your extended family, why do you hate them? Why do you favor outsiders over your own kind?
>>16168270>Who is your favorite scientist?
>>16173495>whats wrong with racismwhat an edgelord, kek
>>16173495>Your race is your extended familyLiteral sub-70 IQ take.
>>16168270>ChandaDamn I wanna face fuck her so bad. I want to have her suck it all the way down and have her nose touching my pubic bone while her eyes looking up at me that'll be so hot. Imagine face fucking her while asking her physics questions that'll be so hot.
>>16168270this bitch is hideous.
>>16168270Has Rufo checked this bitch for plagiarism?
>>16168386The only non-meme scientist ITT. Absolute state of pop/sci/ chuds in this board
>>16168270>Who is your favorite scientist?Benjamin Franklin
my 2 favorite scientists taking a selfie with my favorite president.
>>16168397>tortured animalsexperimenting on animals is based
>>16168288>https://quillette.com/2024/02/15/intersectionalitys-cosmic-inquisitor/>Over time, the UNH scientist [Chanda] has escalated her grievances into increasingly dubious accusations of scholarly misconduct, misogyny, and homophobia, as well as entirely unsubstantiated remarks about sexual harassment.>Additionally, Quillette has obtained copies of complaints against Prescod-Weinstein recently submitted to UNH by three other scholars. Among these materials is a database cataloguing over 50,000 of the tweets that Prescod-Weinstein posted during the five-year period ending in September 2023.>Taken together, the sources reviewed by Quillette cover dozens of vilification campaigns waged by Prescod-Weinstein, beginning in 2015 and continuing to the present day.>In some cases, these attacks were rooted in contentious social-justice issues playing out in the fields of astronomy and physics.>But others seem to have been sparked by nothing more than glancing social-media disagreements, jokes, minor rebukes, or a targeted individual’s failure to take what Prescod-Weinstein deemed to be suitable notice of her accomplishments.>While most of Prescod-Weinstein’s documented targets are scientists, others include a reporter, an art-history researcher, an early childhood educator, >and the collective fan base of Taylor Swift, which Prescod-Weinstein has publicly suggested shares common features with white supremacists. >She calls The New York Times “trash,” the Wall Street Journal “racist,” and the United States “christofascist.” Indeed, a scan of her tweets indicates that she views almost every major institution in American society as being governed by “fascists.” >That includes X itself, >despite the fact that Prescod-Weinstein tweets, on average, more than 50 times per day.This chick is a fucking joke, holy shit. All that Jewish blood did was make her a prolific slanderer.
who was the harvard dishonesty researcher that was caught falsifying her data?
>>16173651>>16173972Still no explanation for why it's bad.
>>16177662Francesca Gino
>>16177688go live more, you traumatized, bitter, sad person. Seek help
>>16168288born to be jacked
>>16177688Hey retard, here's a hint, you don't choose your race.
>>16178697People don't choose to be paranoid schizophrenics, but we still tend to avoid them in the name of personal safety.
>>16178713That would still depend on the individual schizophrenic and mental health is inherently different from race, so your analogy fails on two fronts.
>>16178128>>16178697Still no explanation for why it's bad. Just monkeys flinging shit lmao.
>>16178730Imagine you're bleeding out on the street. The hospital that's treating you intentionally gives you inferior service because you are of your particular race and they don't want to race resources on your race. You die as a result. Clear enough for you?
>>16178734Oh okay, so bad for interiors but not for me. The morality of racism is subjective in the absolute. Thank you for your clarification.
>>16178726>That would still depend on the individual schizophrenicAnd yet you would still behave differently around someone if you knew they were schizophrenic, and treat claims they make differently, out of a natural sense of self-preservation, especially if you didn't know them well or at all.>mental health is inherently different from raceDifferent, but analogous. Neither are chosen, both impact the person, both SHOULD impact how you approach that person when you don't know them well or at all.
>>16178740Oh you don't care until it happens to you because you're an NPC lacking in basic imagination and/or empathy neurons. Thank you for the clarification.
>>16178742>And yet you would still behave differently around someone if you knew they were schizophrenicYou don't know shit about me. Don't assume how I'd behave.>but analogous*Disanalogous>both impact the personYou don't demonstrate HOW they impact the person. Both your examples break down on the general level and are still case-by-case for how we treat the person.
>>16178743I mean you really championed the subjectivity of it. Read your post again and tell me you didn't. I'll be waiting for an objective reason why racism is bad.
>>16178750Okay I didn't.
>>16178749>You don't know shit about me. Don't assume how I'd behave.Okay, so you just have no sense of self-preservation and would approach any stranger exactly the same way even if you've been explicitly told they suffer from a debilitating mental illness that makes them a danger to themselves and others?
>>16178754Why do you always think only in generalities? Let me say it a third time since you can't read: it depends on the individual case and what symptoms they show that dictate how we go about dealing with that person.
>>16178751Still waiting on the objective reason why it's bad.
>>16178761You got it.
>>16178763Where is it?
>>16178765The post giving an example showing that it's immoral to cause someone to die because of their race.
>>16178768So your only reason is morality, a subjective abstraction?
>>16178768Can you point me to an experiment that will prove the absolute laws of morality?
>>16178759I can't tell if you're just being disingenuous or if you're actually this stupid. We're not talking about some clinical setting where you get access to a complete medical history and can debate for a few hours about the man's behavioral tendencies before choosing a correct course of action in how to interact with him. We're talking about some guy you come across out in the world and the only thing you know about him is that he has a dangerous mental illness.
>>16168270Me. While I'm not famous or even highly cited, I'm still my own favorite scientist.
>>16178782I'm still waiting. Where can I find info on objective morality?
>>16178128racism will win
Myself and those who called out covid jabs for being rushed garbage.
>>16178697you don't choose to be ugly either but nothing wrong with making fun of uggos
>>16178768but the immorality here isn't the race part, it's the causing someone to die part. Denying someone medical treatment because they're a chud would be just as bad
>>16176784Twum never did any of that.
>>16179237Still waiting on the evidence proving objective morality.
>>16179237we are waiting
>>16178798haha i was gonna add myself too. i did some genetics grant work and measured roley poleys morphology. couple papers.
>>16168288>88The gods have spoken, Twum is the indisputable greatest scientist of all time
>>16171697There is nothing wrong with racism. Only morons are not racist.
Why hasn't that anon provided proof that morality is an objective abstraction?
>>16181461^bumping the thread one last time so he can post his proof of morality's objective abstraction.
>>16182076>this thread triggers mewhy not just hide it instead of turning yourself into a little bitch? do you enjoy being angry and upset all the time?
>>16182086>ask for a legitimate and objective reason explaining why racism is bad>get subjective morality-based feelings and damage control instead of an objective reasonAnon, everyone loses from time to time, but it's not good to bitch and moan when you do.
>>16182086>^bumping the thread one last time so he can post his proof of morality's objective abstraction.
>>16180923Racism has pros and cons. If one group actually is significantly different than another, then it could be useful to create social norms and heuristics on how to deal with that group. The downside is that it can lead to false positives, such as assuming a black nerd is retarded and violent just because ghetto blacks are more likely to be. Or that dark skinned Brahmins are the same as Africans simply based on color.Ideologies like religion have tried to extend the concept of the in-group to be larger and larger, so as to reduce inter-group violence and increase cooperation. Christianity especially is known for its values of charity, mercy, forgiveness, salvation. These try to give people second chances and reduce the incidence of blood feuds between groups, leading to a 'brotherhood of man.' In this sense they try to make the meaningful difference between people based on values or culture, rather than physical appearance. In terms of game theory this strategy worked better for multiethnic empires, as memes spread much faster than genes.Since there are genetic differences between ethnic groups, and that may explain some percentage of the variance in behavior, it's not entirely baseless to be 'racist' to some degree. However it's possible for culture and upbringing to supercede genetic predispositions in large part. Perhaps the more reasonable future position will be to recognize there are average differences, not expect perfect equality of outcomes, but still give people a chance to prove their merit.
>>16175023Is more like 50% ugly AF, 25% ugly, 12.5% below average, 6.25% average, 3.125% above average, 1.0625% pretty, and so on.
>>16168407midwit spotted
>>16168270Rupert SheldrakeHistory will vindicate him.
the holy trio of /sci/
>>16169220>Terrence Tao>Scientist
>>16187059noobs don't know about ghost tits nance
>>16188501Can't say I've ever seen this posted here before.
>>16168270Why does her nose look so flattened?
>>16188501>consumptionWhy does every interaction with media need to be described as consuming/consumption? Why not:>We don't exist to be leered at">to be pleasant to your eyes>to be sexy>to be enjoyableliterally anything else.
>>16188906>we don't exist to be leered at>that's why I did a sexy photoshoot to show off my body to millions of people
>>16188556You either don't visit much or you're a newfag. That image was getting posted constantly for a year or two.
>>16168270living? James Steele. Did a meta-analysis of exercise studies and sifted through data. Showed that the only thing that really matters in exercise is intensity and that more than 1 set is not required when reaching failure. Results are remarkably consistent when you account for hitting failure. Before this, most studies did not equate proximity to failure, but when controlling for intensity by only searching studies that had subjects reaching failure you find maximal potential muscle building benefit. All other factors of exercise performance are essentially irrelevant. Also did some research on lifting and how it pertains to "cardio". Showed that AMPK was maximally stimulated when reaching failure, meaning that you get maximal non-specific aerobic benefit from reaching failure as well as vascular adaptation. Other "cardio" benefits are activity specific. So if you wanted to be a runner then you would train for running by running and wouldn't just expect to be able to be good without training for it, but running itself does not provide any specific magic benefit as a superior form of general "cardio" training. This dude, James Fischer, and their colleagues trimmed off 99% of all the exercise industry horseshit in 2 studies even though industry fags refuse to acknowledge it because it would destroy their profit structure.He's literally the>"Personal trainers HATE him! Get ripped in 1/10th the time with this ONE simple trick"guy except for real. (1/10th the time spent exercising, not calendar days from starting training until you're ripped) I have the utmost respect for this guy despite his terrible physique due to shit genetics.Dead? Tesla, because he was cool and single handedly launched us 100 years into the future.
>>16189036forgot picrel
>>16168270
>>16188956Her tits are made out of dark matter
>>16188501>noobs b&based jannie
>>16188910>that's why I did a sexy photoshoot to show off my body>sexyshe'd be more attractive in hijab
>>16192370She's trying to be sexy regardless of your opinion on her success in doing so.
>>16168270PastuerWilliam Shockley William Luther PierceFeynman Joseph Fourier Isaac NewtonJames Clerk MaxwellJames Dewey WatsonDarwin
>>16188501Shes fatHas there ever been any studies done on the obesity problem amongst scientists? It seems to be particularly bad amongst females in astronomy and physics. Go into any astro department in any university and most of the females seem to have emotional eating disorders.
>>16168270Bill Nye, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Greta Thunderberg and Jack Horkeheimer. And those black girls that invented the Pythagorean theorem
>>16193709No Carl Sagan? Sure hope you're not antisemitic
>>16171703>>16171728>>16172914>>16173651>>16178128>>16178734>>16178743>>16178751>>16178763>>16178768>>16178726>>16178749>>16178759>>16173972"Racism", 'racial-prejudice', however you wish to refer to it, is a survival mechanism. Pic related. >>16178697You might not be able to choose your race, but you can certainly choose your personal actions. Turns out that individuals of particular races choose undesirable actions at a higher rate.
>>16171697Firstly, racism is wrong because when people believe it, it usually results in harm to people. Ranging from the relatively trivial harms of cruel jokes and offensive stereotypes to the catastrophic harms of things like apartheid and genocide. It would therefore be better in general if no one were racist.And then it’s also wrong because it is factually inaccurate. A belief in the innate superiority of any racial or ethnic group is not scientifically supported; and even the definitions and divisions of racial and ethnic groups that we use are often not scientifically supported.
>>16194845
>>16194847>I hate whites>because they're racist
>>16194847Still subjective morality. Please post proof that racism is objectively wrong.
>>16194847>racism is wrong because when people believe it, it usually results in harm to peopleThats exactly wrong, banning racism has caused hundreds of millions of deaths over the past century, racists have caused none. Banning racism is a key component of communism because communists want people to reserve all of their loyalty strictly for their communists totalitarian masters rather than for their own kin.
>>16173495nothing lol. others just ragebait you. of course they know racism is good.((()))
>>16194845Semite nations are the most criminal, Israel ranks higher than some subsaharan nations. So middle easterners are even worse than blacks in terms of criminality
>>16196404You hate whites because they're racist.I hate whites because I'm racist.We are not the same.
>>16168270Karl Marx (Das Kapital is a purely scientific work, go cry about it)
>>16198578It's only natural for a Subhuman to hate his superiors. He has an inherent feeling that he's been cheated by life that there is a race that so utterly dominates him and his history that all he can muster is awe and hate.
>>16194845>you can certainly choose your personal actionsCan you? Is everyone qualified enough to exercise free will?
>>16197252Quadroon spotted
>>16175154He invented Death? Holy fuck.
>>16198583This perfectly defines shitskin hatred for whites.
>>16187247>He is smart!!!! Greatest Scientist Ever!!!Understanding what others have done is not what makes you a scientist. A scientist contributes his own verse in the powerful play of life.
>>16198583This perfectly defines the gentile's hatred for the Chosen people.
chritnopher nolan
>>16198816I'm a secular Jew. All my jewish ancestry ever gave me is mental problems and acid reflux. Oh, and they circumcised my dick too.
>>16198584well everyone is on a ladder and if that anon gave the idea that you can choose said personal actions, then I'm sure he can. you on the other hand are just trying to argue for the argument's sake and probing nothing.Here's a question for you, if you are doing well off and live a state of life that you are satisfied by, then notice a deprived young animal on the street that is close to death, what would you actions be?
>>16193709Also peanut butter science man
>>16169232He counts the most. He didn't just talk schizo babble, he said "watch this" and made useful shit out of it.
>>16200375Same was true of Edison and the Wright brothers and many others of their era. We don't have anyone like that around today, we only have the schizophasiacs spewing their baby babble
>>16198581>>>/pol/
>>16198578Whites aren't racist, thats the problem with them and why they'll soon be extinct. Every other race is massively racist.
>>16168270me :3
>>16199906good pic
>>16180913Janny tried to delete the evidence of Twum being the greatest scientist because janny is a filthy disgusting racist
>>16188556newfag summerfag
>>16168515Chocolate Einstein?
>>16205983Bootel, now
