Photos you took when you were just beginning on film photography but that still hold up decently today edition/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful links>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film developmenthttps://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php>[film dev] shows results of development regimeshttps://filmdev.org/>[news & community links]35mmc.comcasualphotophile.comkosmofoto.comemulsive.orgjapancamerahunter.com>THREAD QUESTIONDo you still use the first camera you had? What was/is it?
>>4315151I LOVE you. Thanks for keeping your promise, bb. It was really tough waiting for the new fgt thread today.My first film camera was a leica m3 I got for a really good deal. I use it occasionally, but not enough desu. Maybe I shoot a roll with it soon for old times sake.
Just a landscape
>>4315151I've only gotten into photography recently, and went straight to film. Shot about 3 rolls in 5 days while on a trip and I still think these two are amazing considering I have no experiencecanon av-1
>>4315163
>>4315065these are very top quality IQ images my dude. what's your workflow? like i get that its just "correct it until it's correct" but where do you start? is it mostly in NLP or are you exporting a tiff and doing most of it in positive color space?
>>4315151Yeah I still have my Hasselblad. I use it almost every weekend. But I did very recently get a 6x7 lens. Now time to source a Pentax 6x7 MLU to use it on.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:18 22:12:43Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315151>Do you still use the first camera you had? What was/is it?no it's in a drawer with my other unused cameras, it's a Pentax K1000 my dad gave me[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:18 19:14:45Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315167Mostly on my phone desu, mostly Lr. When I'm sitting at my desktop or at work I do have access to more programs but I try to keep it basic. I focus on one thing that's bothering me, fix it and move on. Anyway before au ramble too much, it depends but recently it's been TIF then working with those positives. >>4315171And this is the lens I just got, mounted on a loaner 6x7.
>>4315151This one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanoScan 9000F Mark IICamera SoftwareIJ Scan UtilityImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationBottom, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution1200 dpiVertical Resolution1200 dpiImage Created2016/12/23 19:36:23Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1744Image Height1124
>>4315151Or this one. Some days I miss spending my days wandering the streets of sf taking snapshits of strangers, but then I remember how much better every aspect of my life is now that I don't live there.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanoScan 9000F Mark IICamera SoftwareIJ Scan UtilityImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1200 dpiVertical Resolution1200 dpiImage Created2016/09/21 18:53:26Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1728Image Height1140
>>4315151First film camera? currently on loan to a friend, lil p30nFirst one I bought? Yeah, my 6x7 haha. Love it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:10:18 19:35:43Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4315163>>4315164practice makes perfect, kid
I've been stuck in literal bum fuck nowhere taking care of a sick relative so I've been photographing literal garbage to adequately express the way I feel.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:19 10:19:02Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315215[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:19 10:25:48Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315217[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:19 10:28:09Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315218[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:19 10:32:27Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315219Mostly just a sharpness test on some Soviet glass my granddad gave me. Hopeless for color film but you can make it work with black and white.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:19 10:30:00Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelPENTAX K-70Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:19 11:26:56Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3014Image Height4551RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Just recently found a place locally that stocks foma films which seems uncommon here in central Canada. About to load it up and have a go. it was the cheapest roll they had, is that a bad sign? Never used it before only see the name mentioned here and there. I typically use kentmere lol so if it’s similar maybe time to switch and save 50 cents a roll. >tldrFoma good?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 13 Pro MaxCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (iOS)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:19 08:38:44Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.5Brightness2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length5.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
>>4315275Foma is not a bad film, it's actually good for its priceBut Kentmere is waaay betterIf it's just 50¢ more expensive I'd stick with Kentmere
>>4315281Yeah I have a middling first impression of it already, it seemed super curly and “stiff” just from handling the leader and loading it, if that makes sense. If the whole roll is like that I can imagine having fun loading it into a reel. We’ll see. For all I know this minox is out to lunch and I don’t get a usable roll anyway.
>>4315284you'll see it's fine, but nothing more than this$0,50 more is nothing for a much better film>imagine not spending an extra $5 / year and get satisfied with your hobby
>>4315151I'll post a few from my first roll when I was walking around testing out my brand new to me T90 and crappy sigma 28mm f2.8 in September 2011 and met a guy practising his trials.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2012:09:09 21:24:15
>>4315390[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2012:09:09 21:24:45
>>4315390>>4315391[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2012:09:09 21:24:54
Rando was on fb market put a bunch of expired Kodak max up for sale today, 5bucks a roll. But it’s nearly 20 years old and “stored at room temperature”. Would these just be a waste of money? He also has 200 from the same year kept the same way. Tempted but not sure how well these films hold up.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1490
>>4315436Mmmm love me some film color shifted towards only one color cause the other layers are completely gonr
>>4315275why not just buy a roll or two and try it? 50 cents is not worth changing over for but you might like it. kentmere is probably more reliable in terms of quality control but both are low tier films
>>4315436Offer $10 for the batch citing the film as uselessShoot and dev one rollSell the rest to dumb ebay users for $5 each
>>4315436>”Hi, I’m a photographer by trade and looking to buy this film just to use as props in a portrait. I have extensive experience with developing old film and this stuff is definitely useless - its unlikely that even one color layer is left. I can pay $10 for the whole lot but no more. This is only good for use as props.”Do it fgt
>>4315463Currently working through that roll on my minox. May go back and grab a roll of 120 to try on my gx680 to see how it handles that. I suppose at the end of the day it’s cheap enough for “just buy it and try it faggot”
>>4315457>>4315465>>4315467So was this guy just really lucky then? https://petapixel.com/2020/11/18/shooting-with-35mm-film-that-expired-20-years-ago/>picrel “20 year old Fuji”[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1536Image Height978Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4315470you could have 20 year expired film that was stored in a freezer and works like almost new. you could have 20 year expired film that comes out as a brown muddy mess no matter what you do. its basically gambling
Kentmere 400[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1413Image Height1334Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1107Image Height1290Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width974Image Height1298Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4315173are you the same guy from that le reddit post, swear i seen the same lens on there[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2990Image Height4521Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution3200 dpiVertical Resolution3200 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2024:04:04 15:55:10Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width780Image Height1200
>>4315470Doesn't state how it was stored but even those aren't that great. I've gotten great results with 3 decade expired film and good results with 70 year old expired film but I've also gotten shit results from fresh film I forgot in the car for a month. How you store something means a lot for chemicals that denature.
Is trying to get a colour printing setup at home a fool’s errand? Looking into it an enlarger has gone up for sale locally, but it seems like paper and chems and everything else is expensive. Probably not worth but I’m tempted.
>>4315510>>4315511>taking photos of fentanyl addicted cross dressers for what purpose
>>4315639Ra4 printing requires complete darkness before and after exposure. Look into the processing to decide if you want to deal with it. The other option is to get a print processor, but they are expensive and bulky.
>>4315510Eggleston and countless other photographers have already answered this over half a century ago so I won’t bother giving you an answer, since it’s just a question of taste and aesthetics, and those types of conversations lead nowhere since they’re diametrically opposed. Also I don’t think they’re were a crossdresser, just malnourished and wearing a wig
>>4315649>they’reYou might just be as gay as the transsexual anon.
>>4315643Yeah reading up more into it it sounds like more of a pita than I want to deal with for fun. Guess we’ll just keep mirrorless scanning and lie to ourselves that we’ll get some prints made some day soon lol
>>4315679just print B&W, easier and looks stunning.Or do some gum printing for color
>>4315436i shot some of this stock in 2021 and it had expired in 2006. some pics had decent colours but others were pretty much monochrome. grain was also super heavy. see picrelshould probably rescan these since theyre dirty and ice messed up but whatever
>>4315649No wonder why these are shitIf your reference is Eggleston you're already aiming at a shit target
Does anyone know what this tab is for? I can't see anything change on the lens. When I move it over it sorta tightens, but that's it...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:20 15:27:19Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness3.9 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating80Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
And here is an old print that I framed. It was pretty fun using 4x5 camera in the snow.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:20 15:36:25Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness2.6 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating200Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4315711Are you fucking retarded?? I referenced Eggleston because his explanation/method for image capturing is probably the best out of everyone who does what he does: democratic view. He's an important photographer.Countless other photographers use the same method but have drastically different styles/philosophies when applying it. Essentially, fuck your taste and gtfo your high horse. But hey, if you hate experimental/snapshits then gtfo of this thread because snapshits make up about 80%-90% of the shit on here
>>4315727>democratic view.I am a commie and you to the gulag!
>>4315718I figured it out. It gives you access to behind the front element. Maybe for filters or something, idk. Keeping it closed to avoid dust getting in it...
>>431572795% of all of /p/ is gearfag pictures and snapshits.
>>4315732That is weird. What kind of lens is that?
>>4315775It is a process lens. They're mainly used at 1:1 scale for art/document/map reproduction type work. Many people use them on normal LF and ULF cameras because they have massive image circles. I may toy around with turning a room into a camera with it one day. I checked the datasheet for the lens and it appears that the slot is an optional accessory for filter holding.1070mm is a 147mm equivalent on 8x10 format. It is crazy to think such a long lens is actually an equivalent wide angle if you shoot ULF.
>>4315718Don’t mind the fuckhuge lens guys teehee. Lemme see that front element
>>4315727> if you hate experimental/snapshitsAha, there it is, I was waiting for the cope excuse for junk like >>4315511. Magnificently predictable. Was the experiment “how shit a photo can I take?”?
>>4315784The weight is more impressive than the size unless you only compare it to other LF lenses.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:20 19:50:09Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness5.0 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating40Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4315785not a cope.I never said it wasn't shit. I take good photos, i take bad photos, I did the Bruce Gilden thing here and my zone focusing and the "defining moment" maybe didnt hit. oh well
>>4315804We must suffer for our art if we truly want to achieve anything. If that means posting on here to get yelled at by nophotos then so be it!You probably know this, but 35mm focal length or less is best for zone focusing. Memorize overlapping close, medium, and far focusing points with f16ish so you can switch between the 3 quickly and without looking at your camera. That little finger tab, and the short focus throw rangefinder/leica lenses have is partly why they're so good for street imo.
just some foresttrying to learn how to use silverfast[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800/V850Camera SoftwareSilverFast 9.2.4 fef950eb4d (May 6 2024)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1867Image Height1484Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution600 dpiVertical Resolution600 dpiImage Created21.05.2024 08:31:07Image Width1867Image Height1484
On the weekend, I decided to entertain myself with macro photography in my yard. It's more complicated than I thought.I'm sorry bros but I'm going to spam the board a little, I have nowhere to post my pics except here anyway.I will print one of those 30x40. Not decided which one.1/13>>4315151>Do you still use the first camera you had? What was/is it?Olympus Trip 35. Sent it to a repair shop for service last summer. No repair shop, no camera anymore.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:17:05Exposure Time0.4 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315834[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:17:02Exposure Time0.4 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315835[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:17:02Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315836[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:16:59Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315837[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:16:59Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315838[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:16:56Exposure Time0.6 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315839[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:16:52Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315840[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:16:52Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315841[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:14:52Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315842[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:14:50Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315843[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:14:48Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315844[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:14:47Exposure Time1/2 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>431584513/13It was the biggest pack I have ever posted so far.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7CCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 11:14:46Exposure Time1/3 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-3.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4315834Eh, pretty basic stuff, but not bad. Macro is fun, but it can be challenging to find truly interesting subjects that make it anything more than a novelty or a fun exercise.Idk if I have favorite. Maybe the chain one for some reason...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelPerfection V800Equipment MakeEPSONCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3027Image Height4531Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:02:25 17:26:44Color Space InformationsRGBLight SourceUnknown
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I should position these 3 images in this frame?The bottom two can be horizontal or vertical, but the top one has to be vertical.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:21 09:09:30Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness9.4 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time7/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating16Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4315913try the trash can
just got back scans of 2 rolls of Kodak vision 3 and they are mostly fuckedI gave them to 1 of the 2 places in my city that can develop ECN-2, well actually the photolab doesn't do it but they give to some guy and he develops itsomething is fucked, and most of it looks like stains from tap water[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 20:02:19Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4315822fluid mount scan[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800/V850Camera SoftwareSilverFast 9.2.4 fef950eb4d (May 6 2024)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1984Image Height1576Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution600 dpiVertical Resolution600 dpiImage Created21.05.2024 19:41:46Image Width1984Image Height1576
>>4315954Try giving a strip a little soak in photoflo+distilled water and let dry. It doesn't really look like leftover remjet, but it may be.You can make a remjet removal solution fairly easily and use a kimwipe/optical tissue to remove it pretty easily if it is.This is what badly removed remjet looks like when scanned. It's from my first ever roll of vision3 film.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelPerfection V800Equipment MakeEPSONCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2925Image Height4483Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:03 09:18:46Color Space InformationsRGBLight SourceUnknown
>>4315954Here is remjet removal solution. You don't need the lye.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXABImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1440Image Height557Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:03 10:02:59Light SourceUnknown
I found out I can project a section of a glass 4x5 negative in my 35mm enlarger. As a test I enlarged the image as much as I could. Roughly a 13x enlargement, or a 52x65 print if I printed the entire 4x5 negative.Seems like the lens is the limiting factor, and not grain size.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:21 13:23:03Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness5.8 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating20Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4315913>The bottom two can be horizontal or verticalFirst decide if they're horizontal or verticalYour decision on whether a photo is presented should be grounded on your photographic intent, and not on how it would fit whatever display you're thinkingTake your photos seriously ffs
>>4316033My decisions are grounded in my intent for the final piece. I just started thinking about how I want to frame them, and it has been churning in my brain all day. I've already spent many hours on this project. Wetplate macro 4x5 is a slow and tedious process.I found that a vertical presentation allows everything to fit better. This is where I'm at with it right now, but it feels like there may be a better way. I like and dislike all the empty space on top.The image above is the "scene" or context, and the bottom pictures from left to right give you a closer look at the subject in "reading order". The two bottom images also mirror each other, which makes the more abstract image easier to contextualize.I am also considering a 10x20 frame for the three and placing them from widest to closest shot. There's also the question of mat color, and even mounting options. I'm thinking black or dark gray may look better than white.It can be fun to provide creative input, it can be a helpful discussion to read/engage in for anyone, and I know there are some people here who could provide good feedback. That's why I even brought it up in the first place.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:21 15:11:43Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness1.3 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/5000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating250Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4316043The whole discussion about framing and all is valid, but having the orientation chosen is on you.The shot has already been taken. By you. You're the one who's to say how the images are to be oriented.Anyway, why put them all in this one big frame?It's not the only frame in the worldIf it doesn't suit what you want, don't use it. You're shooting fucking 4x5 wet plates, you're not a hobo.Go get it framed as it *should* instead of framing it however you *can* with what you have on you.I think it should be one long frame (I'd like vertical better, but horizontal would work too) with all three of them being vertical, or maybe the middle one being horizontalLeast preferably but still doable would be first one vertical and the other two horizontal, but then the frame should be vertical. A horizontal frame would look like shit with that.
>>4316064Thanks for your input. I didn't consider a long vertical frame. I was thinking about how someone would approach/view the 3 images and walking straight up to the three and looking up and down would be a better way to create a predictable order to the images than left to right, or my first 11x14 framing.Usually when I need to figure something out with so many possibilities I'll just do something to start off with, and see how it looks. Actually seeing the arrangement throughout the process helps me a lot because there are so many possibilities. Choice paralysis and all that.I can cut mats quite well, so I'll be doing everything aside from making the frame. Unless I choose to make the frame also.
>>4315913these are pictures of mush...
>>4316082Go look at a wetplate in person, or better yet start making your own. Unfortunately my phone camera cannot do them justice.I scanned one of my wetplates to see if I can properly share the fine quality of them, but it just doesn't really work on a screen. I know some of this image is out of focus. Look at the center that is in focus and you can sort of see. They're probably finer grained or comparable to most modern films.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelPerfection V800Equipment MakeEPSONCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width13610Image Height10868Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:16 11:04:56Color Space InformationsRGBLight SourceUnknown
best readily available film for autumn colours?
>>4315727>He's an important photographer.Who told you to have this opinion?
>>4315727I actually really like the are-bure-boke style, but you just have particularly shit taste. Which yea, is reflected by your blind echoing of Eggleston praise, which clearly you've learned from reading somewhere is the "right" opinion to have. Eggleston is shit.
>>4315804Read less photographic criticism. Stop blindly aping stupid shit you've read that some critic or art historian write. Critics are all creatively bankrupt. You live too much in the head.
>>431609650D or 250D could be a real banger. Up for debate if you want to call it readily available.
>>4316100Are-hairy-bark pics is what I've been going for with my dog pics I just didn't know what it was called yet! Thank you.
>>4316085this is also a picture of mush... wet mush...
>>4316115You should work on your listening/reading skills, or does that big ego not allow you to do that? You think I would spend countless hours on the process if the images were not amazing looking in person? Wetplates are physical media best viewed in person. Let me kindly remind you that it is a 4x5 piece of metal with an image on it. I am deeply and sincerely sorry, but your pixel peeping does absolutely no good in this situation. I know it's tough, but you've gotta trust me, buddy.
>>4316079now that's taking control over your workgood job, anon
>>4315805thank you, i appreciate the advice.>>4316100ok nophoto like i said i have good photos and i have bad. I don't particularly care what someone retarded thinks. The only photography criticism book I've ever read is one about Andres Serrano. There's no real reason to talk when someone misconstrues one Eggleston reference as blind praise. I'll repeat myself- Egglestone perfectly describes his reasoning for why he captures what he captures. >>4316098I tend to be an independent thinker, but in this case i consulted your mom. >>4316102quiet nigger.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2020:02:06 08:11:09
>>4316136Zach, you don't use a film camera, or post any film content here. You are a being whining nophoto. Please keep it to your containment thread.
>>4316135>i said i have good photos>posts the most angry teenager edgy tier shitlmao
>>4316136Zach, idk who you're talking about exactly, but ragebait on here is impossible to resist half the time. I apologize for any outburst that bothered you. We're just normal men, we're just innocent men. >>4316140hahahahahahahahaha
>>4316147Ah, we are as but children before God. Very wise Zachy boy, now buy a film camera or gtfo.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4316147>all you take is snapshits>stop immitating eggleston >read less photographic criticism (which i dont lmao)>you have shit tast>you live in your headthen I responds accordingly and ppl still get mad hahahahaha lesson learned i wont post snapshits then reference eggleston LMAO
Technically, no one lashed out at anyone, Zachy boy is just being a nophoto bitch.
Is there a film stock popular in the 90s still widely available today?
The Reinhart wolf book I ordered was delivered today. Incredible 8x10 architectural pictures of New York. Highly recommend if you like architectural photography. The book is massive and the prints are of superb quality.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:21 21:24:35Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800White BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating400Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4315895Thanks mate. Yeah, it appeared harder than I was able to imagine.Anyway, I moved to the village for this summer and taking photos of wife and daughter is almost everything I can afford. So, I'm looking for some new angles of things I already have around. Wanted to do some birdwatching staff but 300mm is everything I have and it is not enough.>>4316096I like Ektar, renders pretty nice colors. Pic rel>>4316157Gold 200[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.2.0PhotographerSHARONOVMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern690Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:10:03 19:07:04Light SourceUnknownColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Here is a section where Andy Warhol interviewed him. Pretty good reading, basically your average LF user.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:21 21:24:19Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness1.0 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating200Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4316096Portra 400 if you want dynamic range and can scan/edit it an appropriate amountVelvia 50 for nicely lit even scenes, trustBut these and Ektar are "pro" films so not as common as Gold/Fuji200 which would also do a pretty good job.>>4316155Checked & true>>4316157Many b/w like ilford/ferrania/kodak-XX[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4316135>like i said i have good photosYea sure buddy
>>4316178Both of you should post a single photo, and then the rest of us will vote on whose is better.
>>4316169I meant color films, but thanks anyway>>4316162>gold 200thanks
>>4316147boriiiiiiiiingjust GTFO reallyyou don't even shoot film, and please don't btwno one wants you being a bitch in here
>>4316178ok nophoto
>>4316191It's /p/ dummy. Why are you shitting up the film general? You haven't posted a single film picture, and you have admitted you don't even shoot film at all.If you must be here at least think up something interesting to discuss that's film related.
>>4316191nigga I've been browsing 4chins since before you could name 3 faggots you likepeople have been like this since alwaysif you don't like the dynamic then don't partake in it, but it works for the people in itthere's literally the whole rest of the internet for you to get your dick sucked for mediocre snapshitspolitely leave our thread, you're truly inconvenientYours truly,anon
>>4316169>Many b/w like ilford/ferrania/kodak-XXB&W films weren't "popular" in the 90s. B&W were pretty much niche, while color film stocks (12exp, 24, 36 rolls of kodacolor gold, fujicolor, agfa color) were sold on any corner.
>buy P&S>shoot 2 rolls on it>find out the autofocus doesn't workwelp, at least I bought a second P&S surely this one's AF works
are you happy?
>>4316253that's why you shoot ONE roll to test it outrookie
>>4316253maybeeee listen for the sound of autofocus motors this time
>>4316273Lab was taking a while to develop it so I got a bit hasty and put another on it u.u>>4316282I shall
>>4316253Sounds lile you got a POS instead of a p&s. Model?
>>4316292Nikon LiteTouch 120ED. It's kinda weird, in the pics where it LOOKS like it got the subject in focus it still looks fuzzy, but on most of then it just focused on absolutely nothing.Second and yet-to-be-tested P&S is the Nikon AF3
Did you know that you can make a tlr from 2 4x5 cameras? This was an accessory that multiple companies offered for their view cameras. Kinda cool and goofy.>>4316294The af3 looks cute. Much cuter than the silver thing. I hope it works for you.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1258Image Height2136
>>4316297Why...why would you want to make a TLR out of 2 4x5s?>I hope it works for youthanks babe, I will perhaps post some of the pics
>>4316303because he is a gearfag that cums from wasting money and taking mediocre snapshits.
>>4316303So he can spend even more money taking photos of his stinky boyfriend
>>4316303Sorry about the angry nophoto trolls. They are so embarrassing. I wouldn't really want one, but they were mainly used for portraiture when the photographer wanted the absolute fastest and most accurate shooting possible. It would be kinda nice for taking pics of my dog and friends, but I can manage that without an even bulkier camera than a monorail already is.
>>4315958>>4315959thx I will try that when I get the negatives backsome of the photos have this weir discoloration, doesn't look like the same issue.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 20:14:46Color Space InformationsRGB
Bought two lenses that are proven working and we’re cheap (both together we’re under 100 dollars) but I think they’re fucked with fungus/dust.The first one is pic related and will show the second after. What’s your opinion guys? Are they worth keeping and using or willl I send them back?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareInstagramImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width960Image Height1280
>>4316345Second lens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareInstagramImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1126Image Height1500
>>4316345Determine how much soul they have first. If they arent soulful enough send them back.
>>4316347I was thinking of doing that but because I love rurally I have to send my film rolls to a lab and they post it back. That costs about 30 dollars itself and I don’t really want to waste shots that could be complete shit. I also only have a thirty day return on both of them which is plenty of time but I don’t want to rush through a roll to get it developed to see should I keep some lenses
>>4316348I'd sacrifice a couple shots in my roll to know if they're fineShoot roughly the same thing with all three different lenses to have your current one as a basis and compare the other two4 different shots with 3 lenses each are 12 shots alreadyI don't like rushing through film, but it's a single roll to determine if two lenses are good or not, so there's thatYou can't have it all sometimes
Some stuff from my last roll. Shitty minolta point and shoot I got for 5 dollars at the thrift store.
>>4316460
>>4316462
>>4316096Nothing beats slide film for red/orange/yellows.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/10.0Brightness-1.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1366Image Height2048RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4316464
>>4315836I probably like this best.>>4315838I'd like this more if it was all sharp, ie stopped down more, and edited to be contrastier.>>4315842This would be the best if it was sharp.Hot tips are watch your backgrounds, and don't even bother if the wind is blowing. And get rid of the big chunk of dust on your A7 sensor, near the long edge of the frame in every shot.Nice effort though.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/10.0Brightness1.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2048Image Height1463RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Where do you post from?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern512Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:22 23:49:01Light SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern512Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:22 23:57:24Light SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern512Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:22 23:57:43Light SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern512Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:22 23:58:06Light SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4316483>>4316487>>4316488wow what a shithole
Taking some e6 6x7 asshole and creampie pics tonight with some cucks wife. Once developed where can I post them so the jannytranny won't ban me (again)
>>4316490Looks good to meBut then again I live in Mexico...
>>4316503You know it's bad in Mexico when they dream of living in Brazil.
>>4316473what color are the leaves naturally and how'd they come out that dark grey?
Guys, I just wanted to let you all know that cutting large pieces of glass into 4x5 pieces of glass is really easy to do with a decent glass cutter and a T-square.If you really want the absolute cheapest 4x5 film wetplate on glass is it. Think it's around 75 cents per shot.Now I have all this stupid glass to clean...
>>4316538I've been shooting medium format and 35mm for years but I know basically nothing about LF and wetplates and shitHow difficult is it to do the whole process? Can you kinda sum it up, please?Looks fun as fuck, but also time consuming and I don't have that kind of free time today ):
>>4316487I really like this photo.
>>4316556The process has a steep learning curve, but is fairly "simple" once you've got it down. The sensitized plate is most sensitive to UV, so you have to relearn exposure by eye. It is roughly equivalent to 1 ISO film. Usual midday exposures around f22 are in the 6-12 second range depending. The best looking wetplates are found within about 1/3rd of a stop precision.My macro shots took me about 2-3 hours each where I made around 5-6 plates. Landscapes are easier to get right because you don't have to deal with razor thin DoF.Anyways, The process:Pour colloidion on plate and let dry until it loses its tackinessPlace in silver nitrate bath for roughly 3 minutesIn a darkroom with a redlight onDab off the excess nitrate from the bottom cornersPlace in plate holderTake picture.Go back into darkroomPour your dose of developer onto the plate until the midtones start to come through. Roughly 20 seconds for a good exposure.Rinse with water to stop devLeave darkroomFixDryClean and apply lacquer to protect surface.After you remove the plate from the nitrate bath you must expose and develop your picture before the plate dries. You have 5-15 minutes depending on weather.It's extremely fun and satisfying, the images are truly stunning, and you get an image nearly instantly, which can become addicting quickly.
>>4316556I also find pouring the colloidion to be extremely satisfying.https://youtu.be/wY4d2dU9wvg?si=EFiVq_7eLhqLp4tH
>>4316580looks satisfying indeed>>4316579Thanks for the explanation>After you remove the plate from the nitrate bath you must expose and develop your picture before the plate dries. You have 5-15 minutes depending on weather.Is the dryplate process that different? Is dryplate doable at home as well? Does it last longer or do you also have to shoot it within that 5-15min window?Thanks again!
>>4316206I worked in labs in the 90s and B+W was restricted to to pros pretty much, same with slide. XP2 was a little popular for the average folk who wanted to play around with B+W but wanted easily 1 hr c41 development. All the local art students just used the university darkrooms so we didn't get much of that work except the lazy ones who didn't want to dev themselves and just wanted to print.
>>4316585I haven't looked into it too much aside from watching one video. The person heated up their bottle of dry plate solution to make the gelatine based emulsion liquify then they pour it onto a plate similar to colloidion. You have to make sure you don't let too much drain off or your negative will be too thin. Then in a light tight box to dry overnight or for a few hours.One day I may try it, but I really enjoy the workflow of wetplate. If you're doing metal plates you can sorta start whenever and finish up whenever as long as you have chemistry and plates. The metal 4x5 plates are cheap, and they come with plastic you peel off on one side so they're clean and ready to use. I bought 70 more from bostick and sullivan for around 60 dollars. They have lots of alternative process chemicals and kits if you're interested.Glass plates take time to prepare. Sand edges, scrub with calcium carbonate, rinse, dry before you sensitize them.
>>4316518That's a raspberry bush, the leaves are green. The photo was taken in very low light, so the exposure was strongly biased towards the flower itself.
>>4315957has someone asked for more woods?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800/V850Camera SoftwareSilverFast 9.2.4 fef950eb4d (May 6 2024)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2369Image Height1884Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution400 dpiVertical Resolution400 dpiImage Created22.05.2024 20:15:19Image Width2369Image Height1884
>>4315721eh… I will need to find a way how to carry this around. some large backpack[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1500Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4316632neat!
I have a question for you /fgt/s: how much fuckery went on while processing film stock in lightrooms? One of the only things I really associate with film is its higher dynamic range, so how much bandwidth were the guys in the lightroom able to control? and did the people developing in camera-houses decades ago all have their own development preferences which is what we refer to today as the ‘film look’?
I gave my black and white film to a lab and they returned it a little bit yellow. any reason for that?
>>4316724the scans have a yellow tinge to them or the negatives are yellow?
>>4316723>lightrooms you what >people developing in camera-houses decades ago all have their own development preferencesWell yes, that is still true today. I develop everything in Rodinal 1:50 and some people will call me retard because of that but I like the look. But its not only about development, you have to remember that negatives are supposed to capture as much information so you can control more when you are doing your prints.Just read Ansel Adams
>>4316658Dang. The p2 is such a nice looking monorail camera. If I can get a good deal on a P or P2 I'm definitely going to upgrade. Maybe even just a front standard. I think the geared movements would be super nice for macro work.They're so awkward to pack in a backpack. I would try my best to not bring a monorail hiking.
>>4316748>I would try my best to not bring a monorail hiking.Weak scrawny manlet hands pecked out this post
>>4316770Imagine speaking before every trying to safely pack a monorail camera for hiking. If you knew ANYTHING you would know it is not about weight, Monorail-let.
>>4316658>>4316770field cameras were invented for a reason you dumb fuck
>>4316783>>4316776Manlet hands furiously working overtime
>>4316776ye, it's not that heavy how much is bulkyplus bulky tripodI will get some large military-like backpack this will solve carring problem I think
>>4316797My standard 4x5 field pack is around to 30lbs, bud. You simply have no idea what you're talking about. That giant ego of yours will never let you see that, huh?
>out taking photos>forgot that diffraction is a thingOH FUG :DDDD[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:23 14:35:21Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2568Image Height3591
>>4316813oh well will try again this weekend[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:23 14:34:29Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2591Image Height2809
>>4316135best pic i've seen on /p/ probably since that fireworks shot framed by a leg
>>4316816You can't mention such craftsmanship and not post it
Bathroom light set up outside to bounce the sun inside for a macro wetplate shots. It's perpetually windy where I live, so this helps tremendously.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:23 14:41:40Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness1.2 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating160Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4316817doesn't look like film but here you go
>>4315151>Do you still use the first camera you had? What was/is it?Yes, it's the Canon Rebel G. Technically I gave away my original to a friend. I bought the same model again because I wanted an autofocus SLR I didn't want to think about while using.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.3 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution9 dpiVertical Resolution9 dpiImage Created2024:05:23 14:58:23Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4316830[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.3 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:23 15:01:08Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4316831Looks like he's pissing with two dicks
My first platinum/palladium print of my brother smoking a joint done about 35 years ago when I was just beginning. Still holds up alright I think.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanoScan 9000FCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.4 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2384Image Height2984Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 08:49:53Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1505Image Height1024White BalanceAuto
>>4316836That joint was probably shit after all these years>kekfor real tho, that's a cool photoit's nice that you've been doing this for this long btw
My 2 good plates came out so well today. They look incredible! Feels good to improve. Two tripods has been very helpful for stability when doing long exposures.>>4316836Might be a stupid question, but can you tone silver gelatine prints with platinum/palladium? I know there's an entire process involving them where you sensitize paper. I haven't been able to find a straight answer about using them for toning like selenium or gold...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:23 18:54:14Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness1.2 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating160Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4316863Not sure if you can tone silver with Pt/Pd. I know you can tone Kallitypes with them so I'm sure it might possible.
>>4316860>>4316836Here is another early one from when I first started doing fashion work.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2372Image Height2964Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:11:23 11:52:22Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2372Image Height2964
My jammed Kowa Six suddenly works perfectly fine without needing cla after sitting in the drawer for months.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern858Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 12:53:50Exposure Time2 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3841Image Height3841RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4316919Tried to get as much dof without going bellow 1/60th, but I think the softness works well with this low contrast film.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern858Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 12:53:52Exposure Time2 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3851Image Height3851RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4316920[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern858Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 12:53:54Exposure Time2 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3845Image Height3845RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Not sure if this counts but just finished prepping 5 sheets of cyanotype and loaded them into 4x5 holders. Gonna be shooting them tomorrow, research tells me that at f3.5 and bright sun, it will take 17-18mins, and since my camera is f5.6, that means I should be shooting for 50ish per shot? I think? Should be fun, first time using a large format camera.
I got some nice lens from Yahoo auction Japan.Can’t wait to make some shots[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1500Scene Capture TypeStandard
Just got my first medium format camera bois, a mamiya 645 pro. Here's a snapshit of my cat.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 19:20:02Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.6Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4316953kot for kot[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP500Camera SoftwareFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-2.0-0E-350Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 10:56:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2303Image Height1535
>>4316920>softnessnigga that's hand shake
>>4316923Do it! It would be great to see them! Your EV difference is going to be 1.33 of a stop.>>4316944I heard you can maybe shoot ultrawide 4x10 with that lens. Do you have plans to use the additional coverage provided by such a big lens?
>>4316727negatives. It's noticeable .and it's just trix. I know what it usually looks like.
Got an Italian girl to model nude for me.I made it bros! Thats why i got into this hobby. Just be happy for me. >>4316892classy i like it.
>>4316828woah it truly looks like shitcomposition is awful, the editing is way overdoneIt looks like a poorly done low budget independent movie with no plotmasterpiece
>>4316995Nah, I don’t think I will go beyond 4x5it’s too much additional investment
Got a roll back from the lab, I liked almost all of the photosIs it because 4 out of 10 are of my sister's new puppy?Maybe.Anyway[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 13:15:38Exposure Time1/45 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness1.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4317023autumn skies[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 13:36:29Exposure Time1/30 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4317025nothing special but I like how the fungus looks like a toad[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 13:38:38Exposure Time1/60 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness1.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4317019I know what you mean. 8x10 backs are like 1k minimum. Ugh.The super angulon xl allows much greater movements than the non xl version. Are you going to be doing architectural photography or anything that will benefit from the ability to use bigger movements?
>E6 is developed at the lab's discretion when they have enough rolls>Can take 6 weeks to get the scans back>This time it took one dayNice.
>>4317029I was planning this summer to shoot some old castle ruins in Istria
Car with his fucking door smashed inThat's kinda cool right guys?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height2005Image OrientationTop, Left-HandNumber of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Image Created2024:05:22 10:05:37Vertical Resolution72 dpiPixel CompositionRGBHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width2993Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2993Image Height2005Light SourceUnknown
what are we shooting this weekend lads?for me, it's a Saturday afternoon pub crawl on Gold 200
>>4317042got 2 rolls of double X ready, idk maybe an old fort nearby or some lousy street shitLast week I shoot some abandoned military warehouses[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 20:17:03Color Space InformationsRGB
funny thing, it was not a good idea to use a 49mm diameter filter on a 55mm diameter 28-70mm lens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 20:32:57Color Space InformationsRGB
few comfy locations[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 20:41:54Color Space InformationsRGB
also I came to the conclusion that Rollei RPX 400 is not a great film it's very cheap where I live, but Kentmere 400 is even cheaper and the grain is maybe a little finer[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 20:48:19Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4317033Could have beenIf it wasn't from afar and in such a depictive wayYou could at least have panned itI get it, the car was passing by and you shot what you couldThis explains why it's not a good photo, but doesn't turn it into one
>>4317031Damn, cool. I may go on the roof of a parking lot in my town and do some 4x5 with my longer lenses. I think it could be fun if I don't get kicked out too quickly.Check out reinhart wolf if you want some inspiration. He has a book where he used 8x10 to photograph Spanish castles. Really excellent LF photographer.
>>4317088I hear ya, I was on aperture priority and the shutter speed the camera picked was too fast ig, need to keep that shit on manual
>>4316995Out here, it's a bit dimmer than I expected but I'm gonna try two shots each at 50mins, and using high contrast scenes to see if I can get some difference
>>4317161Second spot now, it's about a stop and a half brighter than the first one, though I think I'm still under by about 2/3
>>4317164Second shot before washI think the iso base I found online is correct, and I was under a full stop here. So checks outEspecially looking at how dark the first shot still is
>>4317169Forgot my pic like an idiot
>>4317042Delta 3200 and Delta 400 as I wait for my huge package of double x to arrive. Mostly street and some spots near a old style building in my city for a specific project
>>4317000Based. I've been messaging a bunch for TFP (they posted asking for TFP shoots first) and not a single one has responded. I'm just gonna go straight to paid
>>4317170Are cyanotypes always pretty grainy, or is that a result of under exposure? I looked at the process and it seems like an excellent way to get into alternative processes.Eventually you could possibly make wetplate negatives on glass and then use those to make cyanotypes. When I start doing 8x10 I'm going to try that with salt prints and possibly albumin prints as well.
>>4317042Gloomy rainy weekend ahead and I’ve never been one to make the overly gray light and look everything gets on these days work. But while I’m on the subject, if I shot a roll of bw on a gray overcast day, should I just meter as normal, or over/under expose, or something else? To bring a little more life back into the images
>>4317174Where do you find postings for models like this? Back in my uni days model mayhem was pretty much the place to go, but it seems like it’s pretty dead and just full of weirdo photographers these days and no models
>>4317042I cut a 20x30 mirror into 4 equal squares and will be playing around with them to take macro shots. Should be pretty cringe, but I'm having fun so it's actually based.
>>4317201meter for the shadows as normal. overcast days give you even light across your subject so your highlights aren't blown out when metering for shadows.unless you're shooting Ferrania P30 then darks are dark and lights are light lol
>>4317201You could try pushing your film to increase contrast.
>>4317202TFP and modeling groups on Facebook. Also find photographers on Instagram (the ones that shoot with a lot of models) they usually tag the model they shot with, it's a good way to find a bunch. The ones that usually respond on the Facebook groups are either just mid-hot non model girls that think they can model, or girls that are actually trying to become a model
Does anyone here own a EOS 5 / A2e? I'm trying to use my godox flash trigger but it wont actually fire the flashes. I tried a canon flash that does seem to work, the godox trigger/flashes seems to work on everything, and on the A2e all of the TTL shit is working like setting the zoom on the flash to the lens focal length if I mount it directly. The camera seems to know it's there since it wont pop up the built in flash but just wont trigger it...
>>4317266have you tried in full manual mode on the trigger? If it supports it. The eos 5 has version 1 of canon ttl not the later eTTL that godoxes use. If nothing else it should still work full manual through the Center pin. I’m not at home but if I remember later I can throw one of my x1s on my eos5 and see.
what software do you use for scanning film?
>>4317333I just use one of my digital cameras and invert them using Rawtherapee
>>4317333Silverfast to scan then invert with NLP
>>4317266>>4317283Ok, got a chance to throw my x1tc on my eos 5 and managed to get it triggering my ad600 in manual. May be different if you have a different trigger, but the solution is actually really stupid. It’s because of based chinesium reverse engineering I imagine, but the x1t does not actually line up with the pins 100% if you push it in flush all the way. But it’s fine on my eos R, so I’m not sure if canon adjusted the layout ever so slightly over the years or what, but anyway try this:Push the trigger in all the way flush, then little by little, I mean fractions of a millimeter at a time, pull it back out. And try a shot. Mine actually produces a fairly audible click when the unit is pulled back far enough and the pin engages the contact. Once it place the camera is firing my flash no problem in manual. Fuckin Mickey Mouse hacky bullshit but there you have it kek.
>>4317424Oh and also the camera has to be in X mode, also. Won’t fire in pasm I believe
>>4317080>>4317082>>4317083>>4317085Whatever you are doing to scan these is failing.Like, what the actual fuck is going on here?
>>4317424fucking genius, it works. I have the x2t so they line up perfectly, but it looks like if it detects ETTL it stops working. I had to slide it all the way back so the rear two pins are sitting over the edge so it thinks nothing is attached.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4317439Ah, in that case try taping over the small pins to just eliminate their contact altogether. If the main pin is aligned, it should work as any other manual flash. Just a guess though, I don’t have the version 2, but that’s an old trick to use different brand flashes. Before all the ttl and proprietary fuckery, they all pretty much used the same centre pin standard and even modern cameras can do it as a fallback.
>>4317439Nice picture. How'd you get such a flat white background like that? Strobes?
>>4317439Also, if you’re feeling adventurous, I’ve done testing on a second eos5 that has some kind of electrical issue, but it works enough to see that it will operate down to 4v even though it takes a 6v battery. That means if you’re feeling adventurous you could power it over usb or with a single fully charged 18650 or a number of other alternate methods aside from the fagtarded 2cr5 batteries (I hate them niggas). I’ve ghetto rigged mine with unobtrusive and mostly nondestructive contact pads to bolt on any sort of power that meets the requirement. You could even do your own belt battery pack like the official canon one if you felt like lol. Hella Fun little camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 13 Pro MaxCamera SoftwareInstagramSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:25 21:36:12Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness0.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length1.57 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2160Image Height3840RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio1.9
>>4317456>>4317462yeah that's the plan I think, also aren't you the anon that exploded his eos 5 by fucking with the capacitor? I really don't understand your eternal hatred for 2cr5's, they're a dim a dozen where I live and last for 2-3 years at the rate I actually use this camera.>>4317460kek, by using object selection in photoshop and not taking either image myself
>>4317465lol yeah that was me, accidentally bridged a flash cap. Bought a second eos5 listed as “broken” but just has the typical busted control dial, simple fix. As for the 2cr5, I could buy them on Amazon or whatever, hell, I have like 3 good ones, but conceptually i just don’t like these weirdo batteries, and want my things to work with more common standard shit. 20 years ago maybe every grocery store had these but these days they’re a rare specialty battery. Modded my gx680 to work with alternate batteries as well (currently a canon lpe6) since the Fuji aa holder costs like 300 bucks or something crazy like that. Maybe it’s autism I dunno lol
Does anyone have any experience with high end scanners vs high megapixel digital cameras for scanning? I can't find a good video about this, but it seems like from the videos I can find. Using a digital camera and a macro lens usually produces better results than dedicated film scanners, which makes no sense to me.
>>4317472>conceptually i just don’t like these weirdo batteriesI feel you, friend.It's the same thing for me, but with power tools.
>>4317194nta but the grain you see there goes away when washingin general the limiting factor is the paper, if you use a smooth surface e.g. fixed out photo paper it can be as sharp as a regular silver gelatin printif you want larger prints you can also put a strong (100w cob led) uv source in an enlarger. This needs a good lens though since you'll use it wide open and still want it to be sharp and have no vignetting
>>4317555No, but I saw a comparison video by that pushing film yt dude the other day. Can't find it anymore but basically the actual color gamut is identical between the two you just gain additional dynamic range in the shadows and highlights because the scanners sensor is like 2 stops while a modern camera is 10-13 stops, BUT the densities as seen by the camera through the negative is effectively less, more like 6-8 stops because the absolute darkest part of the negative (image of the sun) will still pass through some light and you need to expose low enough that the film backing is dark enough to use for white balance. The scanner makes the most use of the limited dynamic range because there's really fuck all in the image, it just looks like there's a lot because it's being stretched out into sRGB gamma range. A DSLR is marginally better, mostly down to the CMOS sensor, but you aren't getting portra's 12 stops of range no matter how you scan it, you wont see clipping but you wont have a full stop of fidelity between each stop as captured by the film, it's effectively compressed and interpolated mathematically.
>>4317435Isn't that a jpeg compression? I mainly adjust blacks and yes these scans are fucked, they are scanned on a shitty flatbed scanner in a photolab, I don't have a better way for now
>fomapan 100 and 200 haven't been restocked at my go-to store for weeksbros....[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelPENTAX K-70Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:26 11:17:34Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4241Image Height3043RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern512Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:26 12:21:41Light SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Obligatory closed down gas station shot on Portra[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFujifilm eSystems, Inc.Camera ModelDigital LinkCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution95 dpiVertical Resolution95 dpiImage Created2024:05:26 13:05:21Color Space InformationsRGB
fuck fuck fuckMamiya 645 1000s for 450 bucks should I buy it?
>>4317573Perhaps it is a sign that you should switch to a good film stock now. Or use kentmere kek>t. Exclusively kentmere shooting poorfag
>>4317597You know you've made up your decision already, you're just looking for validationGo, sonBuy the fucking cameraYou'll be happy with it
If you want to do these kind of cringe mirror shoots you need to use something called "front surface" mirrors or else You get very distracting diffraction when viewing them at steep angles. Still a fun little test. It was pretty interesting how I could use one beam of light to illuminate all sides of an object.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:26 09:29:32Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness8.0 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time23/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating16Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFujifilm eSystems, Inc.Camera ModelDigital LinkCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution95 dpiVertical Resolution95 dpiImage Created2024:05:26 18:51:34Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFujifilm eSystems, Inc.Camera ModelDigital LinkCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution95 dpiVertical Resolution95 dpiImage Created2024:05:26 18:51:38Color Space InformationsRGB
r8 my setup /p/
Can I soak developed ECN-2 film in pre-bath again? There are some dark spots I can't wipe off
>>4317690Yeah just wash it well afterwards. If you're scared try it with a test strip.
>>4317686no>>>reddit
>>4317686Do they still make flashbulbs or are those all old stock? Always wanted to mess around with some
First roll of fomapan 100, I am not sure if I like it or not.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:26 20:18:09Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3306Image Height2563
>>4317768>not the guy you quoted butThose are not made anymore, but you can still find them for sale and sometimes at very reasonable pricesThere was a guy I knew selling a shitload of flashcubes a while agoIt was so cheap I bought all he had and a flashcube adapter (with a hotshoe and a PC cable) just to mess aroundIt's fun and bright as fuckNot always reliable, thoughAnd you'll need some stupid battery that doesn't even exist anymore like 15v, but you can just stack regular batteries until you achieve the right voltage (like five 3v batteries, as I did)
>>4317777looking for a "cheap" stock that I can just shoot regularly, it was difficult to load on the dev tank since it was so curly but it dried fine.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:26 20:15:59Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2521Image Height3737
>>4317779BEPSIbought also some 120 rolls of the same stuff, I also still have to try kentmere 100. So far my favorite "cheap" ISO film has been Ilford Pan[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:26 20:12:12Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3862Image Height2533
>>4317780Kentmere is probably the best of the “cheap” stocks imo unless you get into bulk loading your own from cinema rolls or something like that. Foma is ok but as you’ve pointed out is more of a pain to deal with due to its curliness, which if I’m paying the same/similar price, I’ll take the one that’s easier to handle in a changing bag every time.
>>4317589Portra 160?
>>4317686>nikon f3 doesn't have a hotshot>spend $60+ to buy the nikon f3 hotshoe adapter>instead you set up this ridiculous rigall in all it's not the worst flash rig, maybe you can wear a fedora with the little press paper i dunno sorry for the hate but i literally just sold my nikon f3 last month and i feel so fucking good getting rid of that camera. i really don't see the appeal. probably one of the worst cameras i ever owned.
>>4317715Thanks
Anybody got a QRD on bulk loading and developing film at home? I’ve been thinking about it just because I’ve been shooting a lot and I’m still buying packs and sending it out for dev and scan, but the price makes me want to limit the number of pictures I take. I’ve been running numbers and reading about it but I wanted to hear some first hand accounts. Do you do color or just B&W? Did you do it to save money or was it just another project to have fun with? Did you gain in ways you didn’t expect, like creative control, access to different stocks, etc? Would you do it again, or do things differently? What kind of investment am I truly looking at and how worth it would it be?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height849
>>4317879For color your only option is cinema film, meaning Kodak Vision. I don't have first hand experience with developing color or cinema film but I know that there is some extra steps, but I know that it could be also developed in normal C41 chemicals. I don't develop color film also because chemicals go bad quickly and I don't shoot enough color film anyway. I shoot mostly BW, I do save money because I also make my own developer (pararodinal) I just buy the fixer and that is, its way cheaper of course and I get more control of it, and even so developing your own BW is not harder than making coffee. Honestly the needed chemicals/tools for just developing BW would be probably less than 50 dollars if you look hard enough. What probably would cost more would be scanning it, if you have a digital camera already look into how to scan using that. I am lazy so I got a Minolta film scanners from the trash, cleaned it and that is what I use.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:23 14:48:54Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3640Image Height2183
>>4317824Yes, I think it might be my favorite film.
>>4317830>Nikon F3>probably one of the worst cameras i ever owned.ExplainI've never had an F3 but all I hear are good things about it
>>4317778Yeah, mine used a 22.5 V battery. I. Think I read they still use those in hospital, pagers or something. It's about the same size as a 9 V battery.But it was harder because it was missing the capacitor so I used one I took out of AVC R.
>>4317614kentamere was also out of stock...i found another store that was a bit more expensive but i didnt have to buy packs of 5. i got a roll of kentamere too see how it is
>>4317901i buy bulk rolled 5222 from a portuguese mf its about €7 a roll, not super cheap but close enoughgotta ask him to ship outside of portugal though
>>4317891who/where do you hear these things from? YOUTUBE? I'm not saying it's a bad camera, but my experience with it wasn't good. Especially when i wanted to start shooting with flash. The nikon f3 doesn't have a hotshoe, you have to pay $60+ for the adapter. That was the final straw for me personally, and it killed the vibe. It's a normal camera, i just think it's over hyped. also, a waist level viewfinder is a completely dumb idea when it's as small as it is with the nikon f3. i get wasit level view finders when shooting 120 because of how large the view is, but the view finder on the nikon f3 is soooo fucking small you can't focus correctly.
>>4317945WLF makes zero sense on 2:3
>>4317945Just get an L bracket with a PC cable for 10 dollars. Also you sound like a total reddit fag
What film for my Agfa shitbox? The aperture is f/11 and f/16 while I'm a little unsure about the shutterspeed. Most definitely b&w film.
>>4317959its the synchrobox? its like 1/60.I just shoot iso 100 with it on a sunny day
>>4317959Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 is the only answer, clearly
>>4317589https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_space
>>4317646kino
>>4317945ok so you're just a faggotnot having a hotshoe is not a camera problem, it's a "I didn't get to know the camera before buying it" problemthe WLV criticism would be almost reasonable, but that's also on you. It has a regular viewfinder as well if your preferModularity is a plus, if you're not retarded>who/where do you hear these things from? YOUTUBE?sure, buddy, everyone is wrong but you>>4317955this
>>4318026dang nigga relax on the anger huh? go have your wife suck on a bbc while you watch and relax cuck
>>4318065>discussion about camera>immediate response is to think about being cucked and bbcbrainrotten beyond salvationI'm sorry for you, plebbit boy
>>4317961It's the 50 model. I'll try Ilford Ortho 80 and Pan 100.>>4317967Can't risk losing shadow detail, so this must be it.>>4317986I agree. Hard to separate the subject from the surroundings. Generally speaking it's so hard to find got angles as there's so much infrastructure peppered about.
>>4317879i did it because i wanted to push bw film and save money. now ive become lazy and just keep shooting and not developing. ill get back into it soon
Somebody PLEASE deter me from shooting slide film because holy shit I am about to spend my life savings on E100 and I've never even shot this shit before.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3840Image Height2160
>>4318148You can get identically results by cranking the vibrance and contrast siders to the moon in lightroom
Vuescan gotta be one of the most annoying pieces of software i've ever used but it's the only one that will work with the older plustek models with ease[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 7200Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width10040Image Height6683Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1724 dpiVertical Resolution1724 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2024:05:28 21:03:31Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2500Image Height1677
>>4318148I shot it all the time back in the day.
>>4318148If only my lab could give me scans as good as those. Not necessarily because that image is super sharp, but I never get good results with the color tones and dynamic range. Everything is 0,3 too dark, even if the positives are beautiful. Half the time it looks like they took a piss in the fixer.
>>4318150its also the only one that works out of the box in Linuxi've tried setting up Nikon Scan in Wine, but always fail with the twain data sourcetried setting up both sanewtain and sanewinds, but alas my tiny brain cannot understand how they actually work, or what twain even is...oh well, vuescan does the job
E100Gold 200Ilford Ortho 80Which combination of 2 should I use tonight for another photoshoot with a cuck and his gf? Last one was e100 only
>>4318363What the fuck am I reading
>>4318387he photographs the cuck sitting in the corning while railing his gf. what's so difficult here?>>4318363for your use stick with E100, it's a stronger power play over all despite the likely motion blur and poor color rendition under tungsten light
>>4318363So wait, I don't understand. Are there four people? You, the cuck, the bull and the woman? Or are you the bull and if so what are you taking photos of? Post some shots.
>>4317945Retard its a SLR why the fuck are you using it with a WLF besides novelty ahahahahahahhahaa get serious, a F3 is a pro camera for non-tards. Get an FM2n with 1/250 flash sync if you just want easy flash control.
Bought a minox 35 GL as "broken" on ebay for cheap, finally developed the test strip i took and it seems to be metering well. this is still hanging to dry and i got too lazy to properly capture it lol, freehanded my macro against the wall at high iso just to see if it turned out. Never used foma100 before, and developed in old used ddx so not sure what the film is "supposed" to look like, but i like it so far. fuckin curly like a bitch though, fun getting it onto the reel. other photos on the strip look better, this was a selfie in a dim toilet kek, but i noticed the text in the background which seems pretty readable, so i'm happy with this little camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:28 20:59:35Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
I purchased a couple 8x10 glass plate negatives from the 20s-ish. Here is the contact print. The old lens isnt the greatest, but it still looks incredible.I got 2 in a bundle for like 20 bucks on ebay. I like the subject matter, and was curious about 8x10 contact prints. Very excited to get my 8x10 back when I feel ready.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:28 20:09:07Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness3.1 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating125Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4318470imagine the smell
Here's no.2. I will need to spend a bit more time getting the recipe down, but this is good enough for now.I like the first one more, but this one is also pretty cool. Kinda cool to print some dead dude's photos from 100 years ago. >>4318470Not as nice as modern machine shops. That's for sure.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:28 20:39:14Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800White BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating640Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4317945>autismI never got an F3 because I didn't have the lens system bought out for it. Looks like a fun piece if you're not a massive retard.>>4317686I wanna hate it but it probably takes funny pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4318508>I wanna hate it but it probably takes funny picturesYou're absolutely correct, snapped this one last week
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:24 16:38:56Color Space InformationsRGB
what's the point of film point and shoots? There are so many more compact bodies ILC bodies with higher quality lenses and you'd be able to swap them out for different focal lengths, so what gives?
>>4318542Today? Meme status, hipsters using them because they’re old. Back in the day they were cheaper and simpler for mom/grandma/etc and had their place.
>>4318542I use my T3 when I'm out getting wasted with friends. The lens is really excellent, built in flash, and it fits in my pocket.If someone else wants to take pictures I don't have to sit them down for an 18 minute tutorial on how to properly use the camera as well.
Bump limit reachedWhen someone makes a new thread, can we keep the theme non-gearfaggotry-related as in the last couple threads?No camera model, filmstock, brand or lens themes plox
>>4318673A mini film challenge photo idea/theme could be a fun addition to the OP as well. :DSomething simple and fun that anyone could do.
>>4318508I haven't taken any with the flashbulbs yet and I'm waiting on my first rolls through the camera to come back from the lab. I got the camera & lens as a gift from my old man when I got his old point and shoot out and was taking snapshits at the beach lol. Thanks pops
