I don't understand how can someone have such clean lines using graphite. Everytime I draw my lines end up chunky as hell, is it the pencil? Graphite size? I don't get it
there's no point comparing yourself to seasoned pros that have been drawing amazing since they started and made money and fame off their art with MOTIVATES and INSPIRES them to be creative and plus ultra. Drawing as a /beg/ with a tablet for no reward while you fight off thoughts of suicide is not even in the same ballpark as what pros do. Of course your lines are going to be worse.
>>7167997Holy projection, Batman.
>>7168006I'm .... projecting that horikoshi is a good artist???
>>7160267That's computer generated.
>>7160267Mechanical pencil you dumb noob
>random coworker tells me he's an artist>Ask him about his work which he proudly shows>I tell him that I'm also an artist and show him mine knowing it mogs his to kingdom come>He treats me coldly every single time we've interacted afterwards
>>7169840Why are you bumping this?
>>7169511I almost never tell "artists" irl that I do art because of just how significantly I am better at it than them.
>>7169855its the best thread on /ic/
congrats you're an asshole. Get some social skills. If someone is clearly much worse than you you just compliment them and don't show yours unless asked you autistic moron
>>7170388and to do it to someone you work with every day is super duper double nigger stupid. You just traded a small moment of smug nerd pleasure for the rest of your time working amiably with someone god how dumb can you be stop taking social cues from 4chan
Would you say the Artist 22r is a good drawing "tablet" it seems to have a lot of good features for an insanely low price there has to be a catch no?
>>7170309no, we already argue about this many times, is the same as cellphones. In phones yes there are shitty models really cheap, all can make calls and do the core part, but in the middle range we already reach a point were all the devices are of the same quality, and the differences are just in the competitive part were brands give or sacrifice some aspects to add to anothers, then you have high tier devices were all of them are the same but they have some, particular, extra, that is not relevant to the core demand, and make a difference, really specialized products or just a bun of extras to pretend.With drawing tablets is the same but you have just one key core aspect and nothing more, the drawing part, and that's it. We already reached a point were all the devices work good to draw like, since a few years ago, more than a few. My particular opinion... from like, since 2018 more or less, any device after that of the big brands are good, any, I'm not even talking about the drawing part but all the aspects of the devices, because if you talk about just drawing well.... you can draw perfectly with zero problems with devices from like 2014 or even further back in time. The bamboo wacom is from the 2009-10 and works perfectly. With screen devices, yeah, anything starting around 2018 is good, from apple, wacom, huion, xp-pen, xencelabs, samsung. Of course you can't say the same from some cheap rebrand products or the ones that are specially, specially made to be cheap and short live, like i dont know... ugee, or parblo, even those are functional, you know... the cell phone analogy.
>>7170309Have a 24r. Screen is somewhat dimmer with the pre-applied screen protector, colors are good but imperfect.These non-laminated screens have some deep parallax, setting up calibration helps significantly but it limits you to be the same seated position every time when drawing with the same screen tilt. Not too much of a problem for me since I set it up in a way that encourages good posture. But it is something to keep in mind.Tilt pressure goes wonky transitioning around the horizontal, as shown in that one video in the drawing screen thread. Got a couple dead pixels but not too distracting. Calibration is weird around the extreme edges of the screen, but I don't find i typically draw there. Calibration is also strange around the left half's upper middle. Not too bad, but noticeable.If these are the things you can accept, go for it. But if you're looking for a perfect device, save up for a better brand.
アカウントグリドで映像はどうやって開けられるんだろう??
share anon art here.
>>7170333
>>7170350
Post facial expressions.
>>7154575Mayonaka no Yoruko-san. Serialized H-manga.
>>7153111faces are hard
Artists says she's saying "kimoi" (disgusting).
>>7146329literally no one has eyes like the bottom ones
>>7146314This guy is the most demonic human being I've ever seen in my life. Something about him is so subtly yet severely off that I can't even look at these photos for long. If man was made in God's image, this is what man would look like without even a shred of God.
>just practice for 5 years to see if you're among the 10% of people with the right neurology to participate in the lowest effort-to-reward ratio "hobby" in existence
>>7164925/thread
>>7164921>just practice for 5 yearsYou just need a few months, 1 year to see if you have aptitude.
>>7164925>It's the same with bodybuilding, marathon runners, health junkiesIt's not, those benefit you long term, specially old people. Drawing is ultimately useless.
>>7167760>try animating then>NTAAnimation is even worse and less fun, specially trad 2d which is boring as fuck.
>>7166548https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent
please help me anons, I am SUFFERING as I am trying to make my comic.My problem are the panels. My comic depends on very autistically spaced Alan Moore style panels. It's all divided very rididly with no stylistic element leaving the panel (pic rel). I cannot for the life of me get clip studio to do that. Tried reading through the documentation - nothing, tutorials are focused on more "manga", wacky styled comics. I am willing to learn any digital tool. How do I make autistically spaced Alan Moore panels?
>>7169878Dave Gibbons, literally the artist from the watchmen, has made videos about how to do paneling using clip studio paint.Here's one of his webinars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIT42n84dIEI don't know if he does paneling in that one.
>>7169890Why is Allen Moore getting all the praise?Dave Gibbons is the man with the vision, craft, and talent.
>>7169921Moore wrote and created it and probably drew the storyboard
>>7169878damn the coloring is great in those Watchman pages. coloring in most contemporary US comics is so dogshit.
>>7169921Dave Gibbons got/gets a shitload of praise for Watchmen, dude. They're both highly lauded for the project because both of them brought their A-game and made something really memorable and compelling. And John Higgins did the colors, by the way, so don't go ranting about misplaced praise.>>7169931He wrote the script. A famously detailed and meticulous script.
What's a good tutorial on how to paint hair?
>>7169958This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0Qh4Cu5ecM
>>7169958that is not a painting
>get off from work (corpocuck job)>too tired to drawi thought it was just a meme but now i understand, this is awful
>get off from work>strong desire to make use of what little free time I have to draw>be neet>choosing to draw instead of sitting and staring at the wall is an impossible taskin one scenario you're going from working to having fun. In the other scenario you're going from doing nothing, to working.
Finally a job opening that I've been waiting for popped up and it's at least 100k/year. The perfect day job. There's no reason for these bastards not to give me the role with the experience I have.
>>7158942This. It is impossible for caffeine to "give you energy", all it does is make you burn through the energy you already have a lot faster. Sleep, nutrition, and staying in shape are what actually give you energy.
>>7158942yep, that's the thing with caffeine. If you sleep like shit it would be the worst thing to drink. You end up even more tired and you'll lose focus quite easily.
>>7158646you're telling me, I do CAD and my brain is already melting by 4 (I get off at 5) and then on top of everything I need to find time and the will to do something creative
ur a fgt edition>What is /fag/?This is the Furry Art General thread, here we post everything related to kemono, furry, and animals alike.>Rules & GuidelinesPlease refrain from flaming, causing drama or replying/feeding those who cause such.This is a SFW thread only, please take caution so you don't get BANNED for posting NSFW art.This general is NOT and NEVER will be affiliated with any discord servers, DO NOT click any of the discord links that are spammed here!As always, don't be afraid to ask for critique!>Resourceshttps://www.lackadaisycats.com/ishkabibble.phphttps://x6ud.github.io/https://sketchfab.com/calacademyComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7170858I had some guy assuming me to be from spain for no other reason than him liking the gardevoir I drew once. And on his profile he was ranting about how "Latinx" -people or whatever are just generally better at art and that it is senseless for him to draw because he will never be as good. Apparently these people are a thing.
>>7165437What if I told you the character designer for Teen Titans was asian
>>7165627Cause westoids except for Italians are soulless
>>7169441>my reaction to this information
New thread: >>7171087
What is it about AI art that isn't quite right? Even with the very best ones that get made you can tell by looking more than two seconds that something's wrong but what exactly is it? I was talking to someone about this today but couldn't quite put it into words. It's something to do with the curving around edges of objects but there's more to it.
>>7169771The vast majority of it was pure shit, and I say that as someone who is open to AI. There are some good ones (picrel), but I find they're the ones that don't try to look human-made.The big issue, as I had said earlier in the thread, is that AI images are just kind of boring. It's (usually) Anime characters in undynamic poses being 'cute' or 'sexy', and that's if they're not the overly glossy realistic homunculi humans that AI often churns out.I wish AI image creators would lean into what the AI can do, and make something that's so technically complicated and over the top that no human artist could, or would, create such an image - but they're too busy churning out coom slop and going on /ic/ threads to try and convert people to ever actually make anything that interesting.
>>7169885>The vast majority of it was pure shitWow you just described the experience of opening up /ic/
>>7169985lol, weak AI faggot, why don't you proompt some thicker skin?
>>7165871>Probably why AI ero/hentai looks the bestmost of the time it absolutely mangles nipples.
>>7168828it can barely string together concepts, you have trouble tardwrangling it to even make a character eat a sandwich while making a slightly annoyed face. it gets boring even for my porn addled brain
>everyone uses AI to make high quality emotes and reactions nowMy job as an emote artist is under attack
>>7169947So the artist who uses AI and can paint and make changes to it will be victorious
>>7169361>job > emote artist
>>7169971You as an artist can use AI or other things as references. That’s your own personal choice. Your success as an artist depends on your marketing skills, how you can make your art very valuable and unique. Innovation is key too, and choosing a niche is important
>>7169361Hello saar, please do the kind next time do not type AI in OP, it makes the fooling of americans to dificult!
>>7169361Hey wtf that's not Aqua
How and why do bad artists manage to get published?
>>7169232I don't mean literally I mean what do regard as an example of high level skill in regards to cartoons and comics
>>7167942if its interesting it will have a fan base. Ranking of Kings is another good example that isn't a comedy, which is usually easier to connect to an audience with.
>>7169232This.Jazza is considered a professional
>>7167942They just drew
>>7167942Because muh disability.
How bad is it to completely copy the art style of an artist you like?
>>7169432Not really that bad. Copying styles you like is how a lot of people end up eventually finding their own style, because it spawns from differences you do compared to the artist you're trying to copy.
>>7169432Bad on a professional level, but fine if you're a hobbyist. Eventually - so long as you're not continuously actively trying to ape the artist's style - you'll form your own style.
>>7169432According to /ic/ it's just as bad as Ai copying the artstyle of an artist somebody likes.
>>7169816>>7169982thisit's a master studybtw tracing is fine, too, as long as you are doing it to learn and not to more quickly shit out more products to be consumed
>>7169432It works for the Japanese.The beauty of it is, eventually your own subtle details and nuiances will give birth to YOUR style.Look at Araki for example, the first parts of Jojo were just Fist of the Northstar with wack ass anatomy.