am i shit or am i piss
another couple that aren't quite as good but are ok. shot on the minolta p&s as well
arnr[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2022:05:19 10:41:46Color Space InformationsRGB
imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/6jgzhCw
>>4313213Not much going on>>4313214Frustrating composition (cutoff chair and lady, random thing in top left)>>4313215Pretty nice. Maybe too much going on, I might've tried to get the building out of the composition but I like this one.Keep it up.
>>4313228life is tumblr
what do you think the custom recipe mike_sunday used on these? he's not telling in the comments. gotta respect the hustle[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4313289>filmYea no one is paying $50 for a bunch of light leaked out of focus crap sorry. My GRIIIX can upload right to my phone for a quick tweak in LR Mobile and post. The workflow and IQ is amazing for such a small camera that can fit right in my pocket. Have fun waiting on your "scans" to then edit for 2 hours each haha.
>>4306499>>4306500>>4306502>>4306503Is this bait? This doesn't look like film
>>4313352film simulators are for retards who son't shoot film and never have or never got drum scans or scanned themselves with good equipmentessentially these are FroPack presets (lol) built into some meme digicams and the retards eat it up
>>431329535mm film has 2-3 times the resolution of a ricoh gr and 2-3 more stops of dynamic rangeThe ricoh gr is stuck in the days when digital wasnt just less soulful - it was lower quality and “solid state” meant “choppy, harsh computery crap” instead of “tolerable but boring and emotionless simulation”.
>>4313386kiddos born in the early 2000s like awful digital photography because it reminds them of their childhood (back in 2012) and nothing elseif you were born before or after that it sucks and if you were born after that please leave. 12 year olds not wanted here.
>120FPS RAW>1/80,000 flash syncImagine buying anything else but Sony right now.
>>43130741/8000 shutter speedis1/14 shutter speedon nikon z7each row collects light for 1/8000th of a secondbut it takes 1/14th second to sample top row to bottom rowso the overall process, of rolling shutter, makes it a 1/14th shutter speedyou need mechanical shutter to compensateor CCDor a nu-global shutter CMOScameras have been cucked unnecessarily for so longrolling shutter is ridiculous
>>4313095>The phone can get something in focus without a 1 second delaylol no
>>4313315>You need mechanical shutterWell then, problem fucking solved.Now what's the point of paying out the ass for a global shutter sony when1: It has the dynamic range of a micro four thirds camera, so bad sony has clear noise reduction cooked into their raws to make the SNR *LOOK* like its only as bad as APS-C (to be fair they are not the only one, canon does a similar thing with... literally every EOS R, usually at low ISOs but its every ISO on the R3, olympus apparently forces color noise reduction in raw and denoising and moire reduction is normally a baked in part of demosaicing xtrans)2: RED ALREADY HAS AN APS-C GLOBAL SHUTTER SENSOR WITH SEVERAL STOPS MORE DYNAMIC RANGE THAN THE BEST POSSIBLE FULL FRAME CAMERA YOU CAN BUY, FOR THE SAME PRICE, AND IT SHOOTS 16 BIT RAW (IS JAPAN EVEN FUCKING TRYING?)(hot takes ahead, some plane spotting autist might be mad, and some gearfag autist whose ego is based on racking up debt to buy an R3 might be madder)3: The readout of a mechanical shutter, or a MS-speed eshutter (Z8, R3) is already excessively fast for anything but specific motorsports, which is honestly a boring, soulless non-artistic waste of time of no more value than blurry phone snaps taken of the exact same thing and you should feel bad for being enough of an autistic bugman to want to photograph it with a $6000 camera.4: Anything over 10FPS is of 0 use for anything but PROFESSIONAL sports photography where things like the very moment a golf club hits a ball are valuable. Again this is a soulless endeavor. it is impossible for it to be art. you should feel bad for wanting to photograph this. This is the domain of engineers playing with high speed cameras that they would normally use for testing and research making an appearance on an informational youtube video/mythbusters or some shit, not "REAL" photographers (artists). Perhaps 12fps, but much faster and we're getting into the territory where strobes recycle times can't keep up.
>>4313319>RED ALREADY HAS*Nikon already hasRED just asked for the sensor, towejazz designed and built it. Then Nikon asked for RED and everything they had, including their supplier contracts with towerjazz.kekekeke
>>4313319muh mechanical simplicitymuh indestructible electronics
Old thread reached limit. >>4269325Post birds.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D60Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern862Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 18:27:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3442Image Height1646RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4312241added ur noise back[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:10 18:36:27Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4312570>>4312575anyone have some good tips for editing reds? They always seem to look off to me
>>4312590Just use the dropper tool and toy around with the different reds.
>>4312582I won’t screw with the noise from now on. 4R80
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 8Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern866Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:12 10:33:28Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1400Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length600.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
I've seen these pop up once in a while o market place, or ebay for relatively cheap. Are they worth getting for just dicking around or more of a hassle than anything else? I heard the lenses are shit.
>>4312030I have a d60 and d7200. I'm just curious for something that I can keep in my car or laying around the house or for like a birthday party, something that isn't my phone, I don't want to buy flagship phones anymore. And I thought a camera like the J1 would offer an alternative. I'm also more inclined to actually post or keep photos from a camera than my phone since I'm used to taking large amount of photos from my DLSRs and such. >>4312023The 1 series I think was made in Thailand, that was around the time Nikon started to really export production.
>>4312147at least its not saskatchewan. this thread got me lookin up V1s on ebay, man, fuck.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON 1 V1Camera SoftwareAperture 3.4.3Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Pixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2013:04:08 16:14:28Exposure Time1/3200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length10.00 mmImage Width3761Image Height2518RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4312303Yeah I guess vomit is slightly better than shit
>>4310777>>4312017yeah these things suck balls, better sell them to me.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON 1 V3Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)810 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:04:23 05:02:37Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating6400Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4310744to actually answer your question OP, i love nikon 1 shit, people can complain about small sensor size whatever but the real killer is lens selection, Nikon made fuck all and there's almost zero third party shit and the stuff that is available is in focal lengths that don't match the awkward 2.7 crop ratio. Save yourself the grief and either get an e-p1 for $50 and have the whole catalogue of m4/3 lenses available or get an e-m10 mk1 if you really need the viewfinder. Or a Panasonic but i don't know what models.That being said, the 1 niggor 70-300 is really fucking good.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON 1 V3Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)810 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:04:14 17:27:30Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
The first known photograph of a little girl[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerTodd-White Art PhotographyImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>>424103 pdf file alert
>>4299134See what?
>>4254822damnbritish roses are even ugly at young age
Now post the last known photograph of a little girl
bump
Very armature pictures on iPhone[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
This is a nice one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationBottom, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
Bazinga[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
At least you aren't oversaturating them in post like NPCs. I've seen them up north many times and the shots you're seeing on the news are basically fake.
what are some good jackets for storing all of you camera lenses in that makes it easier to change it from one to another when on the go while photographing?
>>4311741>How to sweat to death and weigh a ton at the same time.Deck is 100% cotton. So no, you won't sweat to death.They used to have that issue with some other jackets with plastic parts but I haven't faced with this problem to be honest.
>>4307613Get an Austrian M65, I have one from 1984.It's heavy as fuck but has infinite pocket space, is basically waterproof, and is peak comfy. For an idea of pocket capacity, I can store about 3 pints of beer in each bottom pocket and 1 pint in each top pocket. Jacket looks like your pic but less gay and probably 10x cheaper.
What you gonna do when it’s too hot for a jacket?
>>4311899Its still waxed cotton, which means it doesnt breath. So you will be prone to getting cold easier and hot easier. Also, enjoy getting wax all over your camera bag. Waxed cotton coats are obsolete. The realm of farmers now, because they can be repaired. Wealthy people wear them to make it look like they own a house in the country. But they generally dont.I used to work for Barbour lol.
>>4312868Eat a dog.
Kodak Colorplus Edition Previous thread>>4309008/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
NEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWW
>>4313179How many pictures are you waiting to share? I have a couple maybe. :D
>>4313188just scanned two rolls today!
>>4313179new thread>>4313200>>4313200>>4313200>>4313200>>4313200
>>4313189Well done!
Is the Peak Design Travel Tripod really the best lightweight compact tripod that still gets the job done? >pic related[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1179Image Height2556Scene Capture TypeStandard
New kino just dropped. Did you ever want to use your tripod as... HIKING STICKS?
>>4307673Anon monopods are nothing new don’t fall for chinkoid marketing nonsense
>>4299303Manfrotto MSQ6T, works on other heads than just the ones they list. I have one on a MHXPRO-BHQ2
>>4307673It's nothing new, solutions using poles existed for years. The problem is, my two poles are already used as supports for my tent's structure, pic related. Would work for taking pictures during the day, for which I don't really need a tripod anyway, but not for milky way photography.I've yet to find a regular tripod that fits my needs. The only time I need one is when I'm hiking, for which I do multi-days hikes in one go and where I can't justify wasting a full 1Kg on a piece of metal. Especially not when I cut down every little gram to only keep what matters, even on food and water to the point of it being dangerous. As a cope I simply use a shitty 30cm gorillapod weighting less than 200g. I just have to find a rock somewhere for more elevation and it werks fine enough as long as it's not too windy. But it's still a pure cope solution.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 24.6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width6000Image Height4000Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpcmVertical Resolution240 dpcmImage Created2024:05:11 20:12:11Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3750Image Height2500
>>4312786>Especially not when I cut down every little gram to only keep what matters, even on food and water to the point of it being dangerous.There's either something wrong with your legs and back or you're doing that shit just for shits and giggles.
TWENTY-FOUR - FIFTY - ONE HUNDRED AND THIRY-FIVE is the way to go AND YOU KNOW IT!
>>4311301>Going all primes is stupid in this day and ageVirtually all supertelephoto requires lots of speed for good results, normally zooms can't cut it. 70-200 is good for portraits and such but after that you're going to be limited if you pick a zoom over a telephoto because you probably are using the reach for sports or wildlife. All the fieldcraft and "just get closer"ing won't save you from a blurry shot when your target does something cool (ie, moves).
>>4302433>>4302443R8 my lens collection[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4311315I specified image stabilisation for a reason, because your main issue beyond 200 mm comes from shake, not target movement.However if you went with primes instead, you'd need at least 5 lenses:>24 f/2.8>50 f/1.x>135 f/2.8>200 f/2.8>300 f/4Where as zooms allow you to get away with 3 (perhaps even 2) lenses, either:>24>50>70-300 f/4-5.6 image stabilisedor>24-70 ish f/2.8>70-300 f/4-5.6 image stabilisedComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4311320The absence of 85 mm in your collection has been well regarded.
21mm and 40mm. Everything else is bloat, slop, cringe and garbage. Not a single good photo has been taken on 150mm+. Get closer
I bought a D700 off ebay some time in 2019ish before the youtube people made it inflate in price.I don't see a reason to upgrade, everything seems like diminishing returns. Don't need any more megapixels, autofocus is fast enough, build quality is great, body is a tank, color science is great, great lens ecosystem.What are honestly the advantages of upgrading? More muh megapixels? I don't see the point when this thing is perfect. Even the newest hottest most basedest 2024 shit is like 10% better at most, and thats in niche scenarios.
>>4310399never send deposits
Does the D700 become a semi D3 when you add a grip?
>>4310399Sure looks like one.
>>4310658Kinda. It still isn't as fast as one, the build quality isn't quite as tough, the shutter will not last as long, and you don't have voice memos, but you are getting most of the D3 experience out of it.On the plus side, the MB-D10 is a fucking massive chunky grip that may fit your hands better than the D3's vertical grip if you have large hands, the MB-D10 also has its own AF joystick, whereas the D3 only has one, which makes adjusting your AF point while in vertical use a big reach for your thumb; the EN-EL3 batteries for the D700 are really fucking cheap compared to the ones the D3 takes.Overall, if I didn't already have a D3, and I wanted to choose between the two of them, I would set a budget of $350 and get whichever of them I could that was in the best condition, with the provision that the D700 comes with at least two batteries and the MB-D10.
>>4304393Underrated post
Industrial town[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S23 UltraCamera SoftwareS918USQS2CXCNSensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1868Image Height1867Image Created2024:04:24 22:25:49Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Image Height1868ISO Speed Rating50Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramUnique Image IDL12XSPE01MF-Numberf/2.4Exposure Time24771/100000000 secFocal Length7.90 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVWhite BalanceAutoBrightness10.5 EVExposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/2.4Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4308100Nice. Please proceed.
>>4308100how does a Samsung look THIS bad?
>>4308100zach core
>>4308100I helped build that coker. Built scaffold at the top of it. You from the region?Flare stacks at night can make for some great photos, with the refinery lights in the background.
How overbaked is too overbaked?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern770Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution94 dpcmVertical Resolution94 dpcmImage Created2024:05:05 12:33:51Exposure Time1/400 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4312326Get a lens with less distortion. Or better yet, a tilt-shift lens.
>>4312330t-s lenses are great but I shoot buildings way too rarely to justify getting one. The pic I posted is a stitch of several shots taken from the same point with a telephoto lens
>>4312326>How the hell do I fix distortions? This shit is impossibleI do it with a combination of shift lens, rectilinear lens (low distortion), and correction software like DXO viewpoint
>>4312509This.
>>4312336>t-s lenses are great but I shoot buildings way too rarely to justify getting one.What about a t-s girlfriend instead then?
I've bought an Epson L8180. How do I find the real DPI of the printer? The data sheet states "5760x1440dpi" but surely that can't be right.
>See anything related about Printing>See everything is gravitating to 300 dpi or ppi Why 300 is the golden number in DPI? Why not 100 or 500 or 1000?
>>4312385>just know there's a reason why people do paperwork with laser printersSPEED
>>4312443>Why 300 is the golden number in DPIit is twice as much as 150, which in turn is the nice rounded number which is twice as much as 72, which is what resolution dot matrix printers had.
>>4312355>The data sheet states "5760x1440dpi" but surely that can't be right.The printer is capable of laying down dots at that resolution. That's how it's able to reproduce so many tones and colors with its ink set. Extremely fine halftoning.However, you may not actually be able to feed that resolution to the printer and expect to see it on paper. Obviously not with shades of gray and colors since you need multiple dots to simulate the tones and colors. Each pixel you feed the printer breaks down into a set of dots. But even with pure black and white line art, the printer driver probably scales input to 720x720 or 1440x1440 before figuring out the halftone.Years ago, when I got my 3880, I remember testing it to try and figure out what resolution could actually be sent to the printer using B&W line art. I seem to remember seeing improvement all the way to 1440 ppi. So on pure B&W, which means one ink, the printer was able to accept/render 1440 ppi. This requires special paper, i.e. your typical office paper has a dot bleed size larger than 1/1440.On color photographs there was no improvement beyond 720 ppi, even on sections that had a pure black line on a pure white background. Beyond that I found that- 180 ppi was acceptable for most shots.- 240 ppi saw a large improvement over 180 ppi.- There was some improvement to 360 ppi, but you really had to look for it.- On carefully crafted images you could see improvement to 720 ppi in monochromatic areas, suggesting photographs are scaled to 720 ppi before halftone. But otherwise there was nothing to see between 360 ppi and 720 ppi.- By that time the scaling algorithms in the printer driver were already so good that hitting a multiple of the printer's resolution didn't matter. 240, 235, 245, 252 ppi etc. all came out the same.
>>4312378>Also if you have images that exist at 300 PPI, you will need to interpolate them to fit 1440 DPI printing or let the printer handle that scaling.>If you're looking for 1:1 input-output with a 300 DPI file you need to use HP/Canon/Brother who use 1200 DPI for their nozzles.By the late 2000's the driver scaling was so good that this does not matter at all. You don't need to scale your 300 ppi image, and sending data at a multiple of the print head resolution or not makes no difference.The only reason to scale in PS is if you have a very low resolution image because you can take steps to try and smooth out jaggies. If you send 72 ppi to the printer it's going to faithfully reproduce it and you will be able to see the stair steps. But 300 vs. 360 vs something odd like 305 is irrelevant. If 300 ppi is what you've got, it's what you're going to see on a good photo paper.>when trying to print a 1800x1200 image for a 6x4 print on an EPSON because it's incapable of directly translating that to ink droplets without INTERPOLATING.None of these printers "directly" translate the pixels to ink droplets. All of them scale to something they want internally and then apply a halftone.