>>4314213
>muh fps muh 6mp
>no global shitter - bendorific readout
>no superior e mount ecosystem just bloated junk that somehow vignettes more than sony lenses

>>4314239
>we all have arthritis
speak for yourself snoyboomer
>>4314243
>superior e mount ecosystem
yeah the r1 would have really enjoyed that 15fps from those 3rd party lenses on that 60fps body

>>4314254
native sony lenses are the best on the market and brutally mog all cannot and niggor junk. 1.4 and 1.2 GMs are without equal. every lens sony releases somehow ends up the sharpest and smallest a lens in its class has ever been. meanwhile the fuckhuge rf 1.2s vignette more and are softer - how?

>>4314261
The biggest drawbacks with the 50 1.2 is the chromatic aberrations and somewhat slow focusing motor otherwise I haven't seen much to indicate that snoy makes better products.

>>4314261
>native sony lenses are the best on the market and brutally mog all cannot and niggor junk
lol

>>4314702
So good

File: 1000030868.webm (2.57 MB, 640x480)

2.57 MB WEBM

Comp cuz webm is a pain in the ass

These are really cool. It's disappointing no one wanted to hire you. How do you record directly to a capture card on these? I assume there is a cable for direct TV out, is someone making retrofit units to take SD cards that you plug in from the external out port?

File: eSxgNY6.jpg (2.76 MB, 4756x2688)

2.76 MB JPG

>>4314785
I already took mine

It's meant to protect the glass and reduce sun glare

>>4313689
cant believe im famouse enough to have my name stolen even for benign replies like this lmao

>>4313525
I always do, except when min/maxing for small size. Helps IQ, helps with physical protection, helps when shooting in the rain or snow.
I've probably spent more on aftermarket hoods than some people have on their actual camera kit.

>>4313525
>protects the front element
>reduces or eliminates flare
you'd be an idiot not to use it

>>4313525
Well since 90% of my photos are taking in the woods I like it to protect my smallerish lenses from branches and shit.
And I noticed lens flares are a lot more common without. They do serve a purpose.

File: 160VC (1).jpg (4.21 MB, 2028x2048)

4.21 MB JPG

>>4314987
Fix your screen calibration, it would have been a good pic if this jittery mother fucker stood still. Unfortunately his face is moved. I'm at work on a cinealta calibrated screen and it looks alright, yeah maybe cause it's expired stock from 2001 I could fix it a bit but no where near red. Only reason it's a shit photo is cause the subject has motion blurr. If you're going to shit on my photo at least do it right.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:18 14:27:35
Color Space Information	sRGB

WHERE'S THE BLOODY NEW WE'RE ON PAGE 2 FFS

>>4314949
last time I did that, the wind resistance almost made me drop my camera when i put my hand out the window

>>4314942
>Why does everyone say this whenever I express strongly held opinions?
Have you ever considered that maybe not everyone's wrong and you are?

>>4315022
>>4315024
>>4315128
PROMISE KEPT

NEW THREAD
>>4315151
>>4315151
>>4315151
>>4315151
>>4315151

>>4308998
>ISO 25600 on video
you're talking out of your ass, unless that camera is recording in any kind of lossless or I-frame only lossy video, the DCT quantization during compression will eat away every detail possible and leave only raped macroblocks. ISO 1600 is already enough to start getting blocking with a camera recording in H.264 at a substantial 80Mbps. This is over twice the bitrate of a normal Blu-Ray, or about the same as an UHD BD

Can't you just buy a ZV-E10 and put a PC closed loop water cooler on it and achieve the same shit?

>>4309063
All we did was put on one of those cooling fans and the overheating issue more or less went away. Except for in really hot weather.

>>4308998

>stills

Just record everything and pull stills from the video, why would I waste my time trying to set up a single shot when I can take tens of thousands of photos continuously and pick out the best ones?

>>4308510
If we're technical, the format is 127, as its sensor is roughly the same size as a 127 film frame

Dead/ Stuck Pixel.

If its dead, its dead.

If its stuck, use the clean sensor function...this sometimes works....

To mitigate dead/ stuck pixels theres tonnes of things....remap...also, these sometimes only show up at high ISOs or during longs shoots, whent he sensor essentially overheats.

I have had this issue before-- the dead pixel eventually just went away.

If it stays, just remove it in post. Its easy enough.

>>4312983
they're "hot" or "stuck" pixels.
what ISO are you shooting these at? they usually show up at "higher" sensitivities, though I've seen them as early as ISO 400 on my old D3x.
some raw processing software can just process them out by default so you never see them if you import the raws.

up

>>4313944
down
its literally solved, let the thread die. saged

>>4313458
>use the clean sensor function...this sometimes works
yeah that's what others have suggested so whenever I'm out shooting again I'll try that one out and see if it makes any difference

File: IMG_2320.jpg (1.53 MB, 6000x4000)

1.53 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Photomator 3.3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	46 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:04 11:20:42
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	31.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2321.jpg (990 KB, 6000x4000)

990 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Photomator 3.3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:03 11:37:29
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	21.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2322.jpg (2.12 MB, 6000x4000)

2.12 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Photomator 3.3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:03 11:36:47
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	21.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2323.jpg (1.54 MB, 6000x4000)

1.54 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Photomator 3.3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:03 11:35:46
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	21.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2316.jpg (873 KB, 6000x4000)

873 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6YBKdmOlM8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Photomator 3.3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:04 11:24:09
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4308665
Means i pay whatever the seller wants. I look for underpriced items.

Sold 3 digishitters to zoomer girls this week. Made a whooping $250.

>>4308892
Skill issue

>>4309118
I hate people like you.

File: IMG_2821.jpg (85 KB, 640x480)

85 KB JPG

>>4307921
While most phones are perfectly good enough for snapshots, I do think there should be more compacts.

My iPhone 12 mini *can* take very good photos (pic rel) but I hate it so so much that it's using a wide angle lens and not a normal one. Some cases I don't mind it being wide but the distortion really grinds my fucking gears in others. And the ultra wide is a joke... what's the point if it only takes grainy ass pictures literally worse than some of my 20 year old digital cameras? And then having to adjust the exposure almost every fucking time to at least get a decent shot...

>>4307595
>They are shit because of the early embedded code handling interface
What do you mean?

Yeah

>>4314885
You hit the jackpot mate
Those bottom two are VERY good. Keep them. Use them. Enjoy them. Just shoot raw, learn the exposure triangle, and have fun. I wouldn't change much but get a dx 35mm f1.8 or 24mm f2.8 D for the nikon.

t. has $4500 in camera gear and would still shoot with those for non-client stuff

>>4314885
Not bad, could make a few hundred QUICK selling them on your local classifieds

The mju I alone is worth $180 on eBay.

>>4314343
shot your zoomer whore girlfriend larper instead

File: x158HDRSR12-o-1.jpg (25 KB, 750x457)

25 KB JPG

to be really honest, youre just describing early consumer solid state camcorders from the late 00s, if they use SD cards the majority of them will do exactly that. The balance though is you probably want a better lens and bitrate then the sub $200 market was offering back then. Even then, they likely shot progressive video to SD cards

Besides, isnt the archaic physical format a part of the experience with using an old camcorder? You shouldnt be dumbing it down for her, im sure she can understand disc finalisation and burning. She can also use DV cams from the early 2000s too if she has a Mac since they still had inbuilt firewire support up until a few years ago, and she can fuck around with dubbing and get that true interlaced video quality when subjects move in the frame.

But if you want to ignore all of this, im pretty sure HDD handycams running AVCHD (an interlaced format) from the early 2010s had an LP mode where they recorded down to 720 or 480 video. I used a Sony HDR SR12 120gb HDD handycam a few years ago i picked up for $30 and havent used it in a while but it felt pretty cool busting it out, i put on a pistol grip and a wide angle lens adaptor so its handling was like an older camera especially with the viewfinder and it was funny to just walk around and shoot shit with my friends.

Whats good about those models too and maybe others in the Sony HDD range at the time was they used ZIF connectors for their hard drives, so if the drive ever dies you can easily get a SSD used for by Ipod modders to replace it and they supposedly work perfectly and are pretty cheap. All while giving you that shitty diamond shaped iris bokeh, the tiny sensor, and the fun zooms

>>4314352
faggot detected

I hope Im proven wrong, I think I'm like of the very few who have true dedication to a camera. I have used a T2i for 12 years as my main camera. I have true dedication to the idea of not letting a camera rot. Hopefully OP's girlfriend doesn't let the thing collect dust overtime.

File: DSC04820 copy.jpg (734 KB, 2500x1667)

734 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCA-68
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 25.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	270 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:17 14:39:24
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Brightness	10.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	180.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2500
Image Height	1667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>4314524
Where in Greece is this

File: 2024-04-08-0017.jpg (1.51 MB, 2776x1827)

1.51 MB JPG

>>4314555
bruh I wish I was the OP
>>4314686
its Mexico lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 19:11:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2776
Image Height	1827

>>4314740
Why don't you just go take a trip to the mountains?

>>4314522
Thanks, it was the first shot with my new body so I am still getting used to it. Her name is Fart. She was a rescue so I just stuck with it.

File: 1710488099341937.png (13 KB, 197x98)

13 KB PNG

>>4314572
yes

File: file.jpg (194 KB, 1252x668)

194 KB JPG

i found a brand called Kango l

>>4314572
>>4314667
The virgin “haha samefag” vs the Chad “it was me and here’s proof, so what?”

File: 1000002873.jpg (43 KB, 500x500)

43 KB JPG

fellas I'm about to buy a shimoda backpack, am I making a mistake or nah

Idk anon. I think you might be better served by a Thinktank Airport. It’s more of a traditional camera case, you can wheel it, you can also take out backpack straps and wear it, and it has a rain fly and laptop sleeve. It’s pretty perfect.

>>4314837
Its not about how good the photos are but how 35mm film is just worse digital for artistically blind chumps who cant color grade.

>>4314837
Hey at least 4x5 does something special that digital cant even try to imitate without a $3000 lens that makes view cameras look portable
35mm film is not much different from shoving a 1gb CF card in a 12mp ccd dslr unless you’re an autist who likes sniffing vinegar

>>4314843
jokes on you I shoot b&w
>>4314846
>unless you’re an autist who likes sniffing vinegar
yes that is me

>>4314847
Only honest 35mm shooter
Based and thank you for not coping

>>4314846
I love the smell of dev chemicals, yes, doesn’t everyone?

>the lenses don't really matter
>crap lens look good because they're crap >therefore unusual and intresting
>ultra sharp lenses look too real so are not intresting
>it's the artifacts that makes it cinematic
>the film cameras have layers upon layers of mat box filters and lens "scent" glasses to achieve an airy cinematic look

I'm short-sighted, I love sharp lenses because they provide me a different wiev of reality.

i feel like lenses matter more than almost anything else for the actual "look" of an image
i only like shooting certain focal lengths, and i just have a bunch of "redundant" lenses so i can pick and choose the aesthetic I want
shoot enough that you can identify what lens and aperture you took a shot with, just by looking at it

>>4314719
>shoot enough that you can identify what lens and aperture you took a shot with, just by looking at it
Post an example.

>>4314745
An example that different lenses can render scenes differently? An example that the same lens will have different characteristics at different apertures?
Or are you just calling me out on being a nophoto?

>>4314860
I'm legitimately interested in seeing comparison images from the lenses you have in the same focal length.