IS THAT A FUCKING LOGO ON THAT SHIRTDISGUSTINGTHE MATERIAL THE CUT AND THE FIT SHOULD SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES
>>18120177your problem is framing your entire premise on what other people think to begin with. third worlder mentality. dress for yourself and your own enjoyment.
>>18120874This, Dressing well and dressing for yourself go hand in hand.
>>18120874>>18120879This is very true. It's also far, far more rare to have your expectations about someone, based on their clothing and appearance, contradicted rather than confirmed when you get to know them.We live in a SOCIETY where you can choose virtually any garment at any price point, the only limiting factors are wealth and taste, every garment you wear IS making a statement whether you like it or not.
>>18120874>>18120879>>18120988Holy cope
>>18121169coping in a 3k+ fit every day
fashion philistine here,are these summer "relaxed" linen shirts supposed to be this long. I bought a CK one today and while the sleeves seem fine and the shoulders are filled nicely. it covers my whole ass.
>>18120709Tuck it in nigga
>>18120709think of them as an overshirtwhich doesn't mean you can't tuck them in your pants
>>18120709if it extends beyond mid-fly you should get it hemmed at a tailor. shirts tend to come long with the expectation you tailor it to your body.
>>18120709they're supposed to be tucked. most linen shirts are still intended to be tucked, usually they'll make a point of it if it's not meant ot be worn tucked.
>>18120709The extra fabric is to prevent the shirt from becoming untucked when you move around. Long shirts are meant to be tucked. If you want to wear it untucked, go to a tailor and get it hemmed at the bottom.
I LIVE IN FUCKING CANADA AND THE ONLY ONES LEFT WONT SHIP TO THIS FUCKING SHITHOLE. THEY WERE A LIMITED FUCKING RUN. WHAT THE FUCK DO I DO NOW
>>18120925The two halves of this post are in perfect accordance. Such symmetry and balance is rarely seen in fashion.
>>18120899They're horrible and extremely tacky anyway. You dodged a bullet. Wear proper clothing.
>>1812091712
>>18121134i liked them :(
>>18120925>i have no friendsBased on your taste in boots and utter shit ability to plan (serious these were the only boots you've wanted in 5 years and you still fucked up?) I'm not surprised.For the future, look into proxy shipping.
How do I twinkmaxx?
>>18117390>anyone know who this /pol/twink is?annoying attention whore from Russia. he posts on /int/
>>18118656Patrician taste, ideal relationship dynamic in my opinion
>>18117757sasha go back to your containment board
>>18117385Freestyler. Drop the microphone. Straight from the top of my dome.
>>18117385this dude is ugly though, extremely overrated
Previous >>18086713>FORUMSwww.forums.filmnoirbuff.comaskandyaboutclothes.com/viewforum.php?id=13www.styleforum.net/forums/classic-menswear.5/forumwww.reddit.com/r/NavyBlazerthecurriculum.net/forum>READS/BOOKS/ALBUMShttps://pastebin.com/JUHD4Hwuhttps://pastebin.com/SMMg3tK9Quick guide to prep: www.mreero.com/journal/how-to-dress-like-a-prepGentleman's Gazzete info on /TIP/: pastebin.com/QrNDDG60The Preppy Handbook: issuu.com/fiyero109/docs/tophComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18109862jewcore
How do i combine this crean yellow pants? I dont think this fit works
>>18121426thats not necessarily a /tip/ specific question, just learn the color wheeli'd go with blue in any shade or perhaps green in a more saturated darker shade
>>18121458>bluealright thanks,ive got some bluei need to get me some blazer at some point
>>18121155Black loafers look infinitely better if you have to wear a black shoe other than an oxford.
>>18120661if you take another look at your picture you'll note a distinctly sausage like quality to what skin is exposed around the knees. no, it's either no socks, ankle socks, or straight up leggings when it comes to pairing shorts with sandals. but I'm willing to sacrifice ankle socks for the sake of compromise
>>18120562>wearing socks with sandals
>>18120178Probably no socks, which I admit is more /fa/ but it's completely fucking disgusting.
>>18120178>>18121109maybe no-show socks
If you wear anything other than crew socks, you're beyond help
Tips and tricks would be appreciated.
>>18117877ignore him man you look great in it
>>18116237See >>18120955There's little prestige in designer clothing because it's now primarily marketed at rappers and homosexuals. Debadging has nothing to do with "stealth wealth" because these garments are still overpriced mid-range crap, for the most part. True stealth wealth comes as-is, using only the highest quality materials and the best cuts for seemingly plain items, the difference is easy to see up close and can't be replicated with midrange branded stuff.It's just an unspoken shibboleth to let others know you have money and taste. Question is, what's next?
>>18116106I have roundhouse jeans I want to do this to but don't for fear of fucking them up
>>18116106>Buy clothing that is more expensive than it should be because it has a recognizable logo on>Remove logo>Wear mid-tier clothing that you overpaid forWhy not just buy actually good clothing that comes with no visible logos at all?
Why don't you just buy clothes from brands that don't add visible logo? I mean there's plenty of high quality stuff without badges.
What’s the most effay brand of cigarettes?Wanted to get pic related but couldn’t find it in Europe
>>18118298are the ones in the tin cans the same as the one in the carton packs?
>>18120717who cares it's all the same shit with additives, I'd argue you menthol fags are low test
Pretty impossible to have FA packaging in this communist country but these are the best tasting and smoke profile.
Cigarillos or small cigars. Davidoff golds are good imo for the former.
There are no effay cigarettes in my dystopian homeworld of canada
Can you still wear hoodies in your 30s?
>>18120895Tell me what percentile of worldwide power you think he falls into.
>>18119596Different situations call for different clothing, so yeah.
does anyone remember the name of the company that manufactures reigning champ's hoodies for them?the price gap wasn't that huge but i liked the fit better.
I know a guy in his 60s who wears hoodies and looks cool, it's all in how you carry yourself>>18119614t, 22 year old who wears thrifted suits everywhere and has no friends
>>18120912I don't go to the office anymore, but when we were still doing that shit, wearing a suit to work would have been career suicide. nice hoodies are the new business suits, deal with it neckbeards
I had to shave my head recently. Does anyone know any good wig shops?
>>18121021veio noooooo
>>18118087Why are low tier men so obsessed with violence
>>18120688It's the only way they will make a mark on the world.
>>18119756>Cargo shortsNo>, thin frames glassesYes.>sneakersNo.>hoodiesNo.> t-shirtsNo.You have conflated chudcore with virgin core.
>>18120688They were supposed to die in war. They can feel it. They crave it. Instead, he is an amerimutt martyr. He could have simply been killed an celebrated but instead he chose chudom
>>1811951280% >>18119756 with 20% tacticool
For me, the point of fashion is to attract other people. Girls for sex, people at work to think highly of you, and so on. Logically, this means you should just buy whatever the highest % of people will like. That is what I've been doing for years and it works.
>>18118640>In both professional and nonprofessional settings, individuals often make a significant effort to learn and adhere to dress codes, etiquette, and other written and unwritten standards of behavior. Conformity to such rules and social norms is driven by a desire to gain social acceptance and status (see Cialdini and Goldstein 2004) and avoid negative sanctions such as social disapproval, ridicule, and exclusion (Kruglanski and Webster 1991; Levine 1989; Miller and Anderson 1979; Schachter 1951). In the present research, we propose that under certain conditions, nonconforming behaviors can be more beneficial than efforts to conform and can signal higher status and competence to others. We argue that while unintentional violations of normative codes and etiquette can indeed result in negative inferences and attributions, when the deviant behavior appears to be deliberate, it can lead to higher rather than lower status and competence inferences.
>>18119332What if I'm too autistic to NOT be able to tell whether the mannequin fit is sarcastic or hideous
>>18120134Sure, high status guys can get away with acting/dressing like spergs, but nobody's reaction to seeing a guy on the street acting/dressing like a sperg is "oh wow that guy must be high status!""Under certain conditions" is doing a lot of fucking work therehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zq_LakJTsIE&ab_channel=r8448If your goal is just to attract the most women and impress people at the office then you should 100% be trying to do what everyone else does, but better. >>18118643the purpose of this board as a whole is to discuss fashion as an interest and an art form, not to looksmax
>>18118640buy what looks good on you. don't try to be something you're not but rather be the best looking you that you can be
>>18120134This is true and what females refer to as "big dick energy", if you've never experienced women gasping at the size of your cock you'll never be able to pull it off, being a conformie is the best choice for the majority.
Do clothes look bad nowadays because they’re all cheaply made? It seems like you have to spend hundreds on something for it to look nice, whereas in the past everything, cheap and expensive, just appeared to be made with better material.
>>18120796its meaningless because "made in usa" only refers to the final sewing/assembly of the garment. you can ship straight up slop textile straight from china, pay an illegal immigrant below minimum wage to sew it together, and call it "made in usa" legally.the brands that don't do this and aren't ripping you off will tell you where the cotton was grown, where it was milled into textile, and often times they'll give you the exact names of the farms and mill. without that information (or the equivalent to it for other garments) made in usa may as well mean nothing. usa is a high tier region to grow cotton in but not even really the best in the world.AND ALSOthere isn't inherently anything good about making textile in a first world country. its like the selvedge line on jeans -- a company that pays first world wages to their textile workers IS LESS LIKELY TO cut huge corners elsewhere. that's all it means. more likely to not be shit. doesn't mean it isn't shit.
Partly but it’s mostly the people themselves looking like shit.
>>18120914ww1 -> ww2 meatgrinder of white death then mass immigration really did a number on the average american and european physique. europe was hit less hard by immigration, or at least less quickly than america, but it was made up for in all the weird eugenics shit that happened over the last century like scandinavians force sterilizing guys who looked too swole at the gym.
Clothes have always been expensive. They just figured out how to manufacture fashionslop at the speed of light and now $10 for a pair of pants is normal.
>>18120957>now $10 for a pair of pants is normal.And people look at you weird if you say you spent $100 on one pair.
saars how to dress? i want to look like king.
>>18120878You can't be fat without lifting heavy weight. Hit your hairy booty to the gym, retard.
Woolen Swiss field jacket. Cop or not? I'm Han Chinese, if it matters.
>>18120724No, it's like that by itself.So air dried basically? I think the belt is what really makes it come together nicely.
>>18120751>So air dried basically?Yeah. Isn't that the "default"?
>>18120754>Isn't that the "default"?Thought maybe drying, then brushing, or the other way around.
>>18120801My prcoess is like this>shower>wipe with towel to get most of the water out>comb it>ruffle it (optional)>wait for it to dry
>>18120803The way I do it is pretty much the same, except for the ruffling. I might try that, thanks.
