>some people say that yuri is too boring>then watch romcoms where nothing happens>meanwhile in chapter 30 of yuri mangaNot even their first kiss either
>>286026457nothing beats watching two women talk about their feelings for the entirety of the manga, yep that's real cinema right there, watching women talk about their emotions and there being only women to take the backlash of their overreactions and misunderstandings as they act like toddlers high on meth
>>286026457Stay In your shithole, loveless fag
>>286026498>this is just talking about their feelingsAnd what happens in the romance manga you read?
>>286026732there are two wolves inside you, one of them is yapping about your emotions and the other one is lust t. womeni recognize that you have great love for women, it requires great love to tolerate a piece of entertainment that features them and them in general
>>286026820The men in BL act far more like women than any other genre.>>286026854A simple kiss is porn to you? Plus it's not other romance series are devoid of ecchi.
>>286026907that's because you're reading the wrong kind of media that portrays mans love for his fellow men, try jojo's bizarre adventures, dragon ball z or any of the other nakama animeplatonic love between men is more beautiful than any waah waah slurp slurp written about womenBL characters act like women because they're written by and for women
>>286026935kill yourself you stupid fucking cunt
>>286026935>all yuritards are either self inserting as a female or literal cucksI enjoy it for neither of those reasons. You only think that because you lack imagination.>>286026980>nakama animeThis whole thread is about comparing yuri to other forms of romance. But not reading any kind of romance just seems gay.
>>286027107It can be it's done right, but most straight romance these days sucks.
>>286027231Okay but there are student x teacher age gap pairings in yuri too.
>>286027400Then the fact that so many yuri manga are better than straight manga these days is a testament to dismal quality of the latter.>>286027533Going to need a better argument than just accusing me of being a tranny.
>>286027573Why? It fits you perfectly.
>>286027087Romance doesn't mean the same thing to men that it does to women. When a man sees the word "romance", he thinks of stuff like going on a grand adventure, fighting dragons.
>>286027583For one, I'm not a tranny nor do I want to be a woman.>>286027623>There's a reason why there's very few yuri anime and even less yuri anime with more than one seasonPlease tell me you're not making a popular = good argument here.
>>286026457The exact same slop except it's two girls is not revolutionary
>>286027573They are aimed at entirely different demographics. Yuri is aimed at lesbians. Most romance is aimed at heterosexual men or women.
>>286027690The difference (especially compared to modern romance series for guys) is that because the audience doesn't need to have their emotions validated all the time, so relationship can develop at a reasonable pace instead of being stuck in development hell.>>286027699Most yuri is not aimed at lesbians. Yuri Hime has an 70% male audience and a lot of yuri is published in seinen magazines like Kirara/Dengki with 90% male audiences. Even the popular yuri works in shoujo magazines are published for a straight female audience.
9 times out of 10, when a couple gets together, the series goes to shit and the audience loses interest.
>>286027725>fagshit is just lustNot when it comes to fiction.>>286027769The yuri anime airing this season has a straight side couple in it, which is more than most seinen/shounen romance manga have (the same ones that can't have any girls love someone other than MC).
Most yuri romance leads have even less personality than your average hetero or even gay romance leads, and that's saying something.
>>286027835>All of them have secondary pairingsWhere are the secondary pairings in OsaLove this season?
>>286027930>I don't know how to use googleFigures that you're retarded. And nowhere did I say it was good or that I am watching it. I held it up as an obvious counter-example from this very season.
>>286027993You said "all" but you think that's the only example? It's just the easiest example for this season alone. Where are the side pairings in popular romance manga like Nagatoro or My Dress-Up Darling? >>286027883What makes you think that? At worse, they are on pair.
>>286028101>*on pairDumb mistake of mine.
Plus: just as a reminder for the thread, I am not a guy or straight romance hater. I read plenty of straight stuff too and some of my favourite romance anime include Acchi Kocchi and Horimiya. I just think that the average yuri manga these days is more entertaining than the stuff made for guys (straight shoujo stuff can be good in contrast).
Is this the bread?
What's the verdict on Shunrai Table Tennis?
>>286026457>there's a kiss in chapter 30 (cool ig)>they talkmeanwhile...>>286026732>the mc and love interest get stuck in a room and after that get stuck in a closet of the room and they're naked somehow and ""technically"" it's not sex (this starts the meme that there's no progression/sex)>mc accidentally falls down the stairs into the woman and they accidentally undress and more things happen that are ""technically"" not sex >in the span of one chapter some gal turns into a giantess and they basically have sex>intricate relationships develop that take a chart to understand and 30 different gals fight each other and it rivals game of thrones>mc fends off stoic girl with katana and they fight with katana and it wins her love that it was the first guy to fight her with a katana>someone discovers time travel>the mc and love interests all develop [Abilities] that they use to fight monsters called the [Enemies of Humanity] and by ending the [Source of All Evil] they save the world>this entire Plot happens even though it's a romance manga>there's a The Room You Can't Leave Without Having S*x but at the last minute someone breaks the room for them before they have sex (whew) btw they find out that the futa-yuri pair next door had sex >the mc and love interest confess their love and that energy destroys the [Source of All Evil]>actually they kiss anyway>they wear yukata for a festival and it's very romantic and platonicromance I read >> other romance
>>286030433
>>286030444
>>286030451
>>286030460
>>286030470
>>286030483
>>286030495
>>286026907Mirei is so fucking sexo I do not blame Soprano
>>286030503
>>286030514
>>286030511
>>286030522
>>286030532
https://x.com/hane_haneusa/status/2022247981639229929
>>286026457Only ecchi/explicit yuri manga is good.Any SFW garbage like this is cancer.
>>286031439Right fingered left's pussy.
>>286030908>ears became erect
>>286031539It happens when they're on alert, not horny.
>>286030908I was deeply disappointed by the anime-exclusive revision that arbitrarily eliminated the original yuri appeal and forcibly added unnecessary heterosexual elements. This is a betrayal of the source material, and it can only be described as the writer being utterly disqualified. Until the editor in charge changes, I will not buy a single volume of the manga version.
Any works not explicitly yuri sooner or later becomes het.
>>286026457it's bound to be interesting with all the non-con to spice it up
Post yuri Valentine's Day art if you come across it.
>>286031475Wat
>>286031856Chapter 35. Have you even read it?
>>286031709Meanwhile, “original yuri appeal” is merely a safe route. At least, according to the director.
>>286027769>there's a reason why yuri manga arent allowed to have men in in>I'm retarded and I don't know manga like Yagate Kimi ni NaruYou can hate yuri all you want, but stop acting retarded
>>286031709You didn't watch the movie and definitely aren't reading the manga and basing your shitpost out of a single panel
>>286032084He’s been shitposting all day
What a tragic suicide.
>>286032172I think this is way too overblown, but holy shit, this is funny as fuck. Mangaka is a fucking retard lol.
>>286032084It's a paste of a tweet from your typical insane chink. At least anon didn't pull up the ones where they insult the author's mother.
>>286032172How different is this scene from anime? I thought he asked to marry her in anime anyway.
>>286032172Those usernames… 200% mainlanders
>>286032172desu if the mangaka didnt say they dislike gl then that panel wouldnt really matter
>>286032235They said that? Link? Lol, what a retard if true.
>>286032224By removing lots of yuri moments.
>>286032251>>286029113
Yuribros, nothing terrible has happened.It's just the usual insane chink.Stay strong, yuribros...
>>286032235tfw not taking gl and bl commissions = hating on yuri
>>286032263Surely you can list them.
>>286032251>>286029113●カラー/モノクロ、背景、キャラデザのみ等、指定ありましたら依頼時にお知らせください。●NG: 二次創作/R-18/グロ・リョナBL・百合（GL）も対応難しいです…(ブロマンス・友情はOKです！)その他、作者が難しいと判断した依頼はお断りさせていただく場合があります。あらかじめご了承ください。>Gemini 3 Pro● Please let me know at the time of your request if you have specific designations, such as Color/Monochrome, Backgrounds, or Character Design only, etc.● NG (Not Allowed): Fan Art (Derivative Works) / R-18 (18+) / Gore / RyonaI also find it difficult to handle BL (Boys' Love) and Yuri (Girls' Love)... (Bromance and Friendship depictions are OK!)Please note in advance that I may decline other requests if I judge them to be too difficult for me to complete.
>>286032274I mean, the anime and LN is literally yuri. I wouldn't worry about that.>>286032280>incapable of yuri and BL>accept to be the mangaka for a series with both
>>286032263Unsourced, exactly what was removed? And the novel version was heavily consulted with the anime staff and had cuts too, how much evidence do you have to pin the removed(even it’s even true) content on the mangaka?
>>286032297>Bromance and Friendship depictions are OK!
I’m media literate so I’ll wait until later volumes are released to judge.
>>286032358This will be the tamest thing in any of the upcoming doujins.
>>286032358why is yacchi the one holding the leash?
>>286032358>I'll wait until the editorial deparment forces the mangaka to stop being a retard to judgeftfy
>>286032274>insane chinkUnfortunately their monetary power is something Japs can't ignore.
>make the LN more gay>but the manga is hetmixed media slop is a mistake
>>286029113>>286032297I don't judge people's taste but this basically confirms Kaguya is not GL because said mangaka is fine drawing it.
By the way, this vile, yuri-hating mangaka added things like Kaguya holding Iroha's hands while Iroha folds at the beach (movie cuts directly to Iroha on all fours) and them sleeping together before the apartment hunt/Iroha collapsing scene (Iroha is sleeping on her own and yell at Kaguya to stop livestreaming in the movie). Thank god these honest chinese fans decided to harass her.
Breaking News: Girls marrying each other isn't yuri anymore because a nigger draws it. More at 6.
>>286032474Assault Lily and D4DJ are consistently yuri thoughThe latter even has GL
>>286032501Asslily is not yuri
>>286032499media literacy unyuri moments
>>286032501didn't D4DJ add self-insert shit?
>>286032499Mangaka clearly just sees them as friends.
>>286032474>anime doesn't say anything unambiguously>LN panders to yurifags>manga panders to non-yurifagsSitting on two chairs, business as usual. Not for the first time, not for the last time.
>>286032499>Friendship depictions are OKHe said it himself.
Until it’s review bombed on Amazon this is just a manufactured 4chinz drama.
>>286027087romance = loveplatonic love = nakama animeget your mind out of the gutter yapper slutmen who love masculinity don't need sex to enjoy itwomen don't understand men, the romantic ideal woman that is loyal like a man is a man made romantic idealmen want speedwagon, not a bad bitch
>>286032560So, this just means that yurifags are all high IQ literates?
>anime doesn't say anything unambiguously>anon doesn't apply himself
>>286032572Mask off
>>286032612I personally don't think being obsessed with dick is high IQ.
>>286032478The original is the movie, not the manga, why are people here so retarded?
>even when talking about woman on woman relationships, women's only defense is centered around the penisevery time a woman uses penis / sex related insult / threat in a argument the ghost of psychology grows stronger
>>286032633look at the op and figure out what kind of posters it attracts. use the other thread if you don’t want that.
>>286032560>>anime doesn't say anything unambiguously You are actually blind and retarded if you believe this.
Some actual retardation in this thread over scraps drama, first what an author will do for comissions has nothing to do with an actual job, it's amazing some of you really think the manga is somehow pandering to a different audience when it's literally the same story with the same notes just more compressed as usual to fit the planned volume lenght.
>>286026457Faggot
>>286032319The mangaka literally admitted to it on twitter.https://x.com/kome00717/status/2018270468256739667
>>286032761Idk about the other anons, but I'm just here to laugh at how overblown and easily avoidable it is. Both sides are retarded in a different way, so I can just happily laugh. Kaguya is as yuri as it gets and ain't no nigger adaptation is going to change that.
I just don't trust Netflix
>>286032802> Kaguya is as yuri as it gets ?Is Kaguya more yuri than Hayacoco?
>>286032822Yeah.
Herbal tea and parfait color means they fucked, period.
>>286032761The point is not what he's willing to do or not, the point is that there clearly won't be any love in it. That said you're an idiot in the first place if you give a shit about these mandatory manga adaptations that are almost always given to some mercenary second rate artists and are never more than a cheap derived product.
>>286032843Pardon, confused the images.
>>286032843>>286032866Sorry again. Probably didn't get enough sleep. Now, that's definitely the right image.
>>286032863An even more embarrassing post below you lol
Can we just have "that" regular poster?
>>286032843>>286032866All good yuri.
>>286032880>>286032863>>286032895You retards do know those are bait posts....right ?
I'm convinced that the media literacy poster is just a falseflagger trying to make scrapfags look even worse than they already are
>>286032908narenare was complete dogshit and not yuri at all
Jellyfish season 2.
>>286032902https://d4dj-groovymix.jp/unit/tendo-hayate/https://d4dj-groovymix.jp/unit/shinomiya-kokoa/It is insane what their voice samples say.
>>286032967Elaina is literally yuri though.
>>286032802The truth is that anons are just upset the author isn't a yuri author, it's all there is to it. >>286032860There won't be any intimacy and this is no different from the movie.
>>286026457It is kind of boring. There's certain dynamics between men and women that two women fail to mimic. Which is why it needs to compensate by speeding up progress and write abusive situations with fucked up power plays. Meanwhile, just a man and a woman alone in a room together creates sexual energy.
>>286033003>The truth is that anons are just upset the author isn't a yuri author, it's all there is to it. Idk where you pulled that from but if you've visited yuri threads before, you know yurifags don't hate authors just because they do het or like het more. Recent example: Seawead.>inb4 Nio NakataniPretty sure they hate her because she's pretentious, not because she does het.
>>286033049Okay Ikuhara.
>>286033055You're delusional
>>286033003Stop acting like you've watched the movie.
>>286033078Care to prove me wrong?
>>286033049>just a man and a woman alone in a room together creates sexual energyNot really, I have seen enough romance anime and manga to know that's not true
>>286033081The movie has explicit yuri content, but it does not have intimacy and you shouldn't pretend it does or try to twist intimacy into something it isn't, it doesn't help the work when you are more interested in playing semantics than talking about it. >>286033055There is a different between an yuri author who does het works and an author who doesn't do yuri at all, again this whole drama is because this author said they don't want to do commissions of content they are not used to draw and it's perfectly reasonable.
>>286026457Yuri is boring and I dislike homosexual women and men, simple as.
>>286033049>Meanwhile, just a man and a woman alone in a room together creates sexual energy.Isn't this the same sort of shit people shit on yurifags for spouting
>>286033125There is a lot of sexual tension in the room in Nagatoro, see for example this scene from the anime.
>>286033189Again, stop acting like you've watched the movie.
>>286032948Kaguya is everything Jellyfish wished to be
>>286033205>Isn't this the same sort of shit people shit on yurifags for spoutingI don't shit on them for it. Yuri bait is real and recognized by the industry.
https://comic-walker.com/detail/KC_005229_S/episodes/KC_0052290000100011_E>百合 taghttps://comic-walker.com/detail/KC_008281_S/episodes/KC_0082810000400021_E>no 百合 tag
>>286033189No? A lot of yuri authors have het background. See Iruma Hitoma and Midori Chigusa. Even when Haganai author wrote her yuri series, yurifags loved it.There's a different between someone who can't do yuri, and yet given a yuri series on a silver plate and someone who's willing to give yuri a change. It isn't about yuri vs het authors.
>>286033293nta, but I like yuri and I also like Nagatoro
>>286033322>No.>just spouts the same shit againSo, the answer is yes
>>286033293Oh, you are more than welcome to use Nagatoro as example for romcoms, especially with the asexual ending it got.
>>286033314>original is the manga>original isn't the mangaGet actual arguments
>>286033323>Midori
>>286033323*Minori*A chanceLong day at work. Sorry.
>>286032172All it took was clicking on a few such tweets, and now my FY tab is a copium festival. Thank you, algorithm, thank you very much.
>>286033396>copium>when it's the truthYou are the one coping thinking the mangs is relevant
>>286033392>/co/shit
>>286032931Obviously. Even bringing up a forgotten and disastrous PA original flop in the same discussion as one of the best and most successful anime original yuri anime is telling enough about his bad faith.
>>286033396Oh, so if an anime have a girl ends happily with a guy, and the adaptation have him getting NTR'd by another man, it's still relevant?
>>286033392NTA, but they didn't even kiss or do anything sexual no ? I do know that the original of it by the mangaka is different though
>>286033396After all, science has proven that the line between extremely relevant side content and completely irrelevant side content is thinner than a human hair.
>>286033429>he thinks yurifags are willing to bend over for anything like him
>>286033429>even more /co/shit
>>286033449I was talking about the anime, my fault.
>>286033433I don't think that's a good example, but you are arguing against someone who is arguing in bad faith
>>286033323The only person making it to be about yuri and het authors is you, the only thing I said is that people are upset the author isn't a recognized yuri author and are pushing ridiculous narratives the author isn't writing the same content and themes as the movies, if it was Moke or Chigusa doing this adaptation they wouldn't be saying the same shit. This author didn't got anything in a silver plate, they are doing the same job as anyone else would and has nothing to do with their commissions.
>>286032967Uma Musume is literary yuri though
>superiority complex the thread
>>286033492>/co/ reaction pic
>>286033530Uma Musume is about races, not romance in any way
>>286033435They kissed like once or twice, then they just acted like best friends in the ending and the prologue, their relationship regressed from lovers to roommates in a ridiculous fast speed, it's very obvious anons like >>286033449 get intimated by the fact they will never have a girlfriend and the author toned it down to stop hurting his fragile asexual audience.
>>286033532I'm someone who can enjoy both yuri and hetero
>>286033527This mangaka should've declined the job if they didnt want to work on stuff with Yuri elements.
>>286033549This post is full of copium.
>>286027107It's so funny how "straight" fags always find their way into gay threads over and over again
>>286033527And again, I'm saying that yurifags don't give a shit about whether the mangaka is recognizable or not. I think that making shit up is wrong, but the author is clearly very close minded on yuri. There plenty of yuri without a series right now. I, for one, would love a Arata Iri adaptation of it, but she's doing het (also adaptation, I think?).>>286033617See >>286033532It's all tribalism for these people. You have to pick a camp, and you have to demonize the other.
>>286033631nta, but many yuri are made to appeal to the male demographic. That said, Uma Musume has no romance at all, so I don't get this discussion from either side
To bridge the gap between het and yuri, i present:
>>286033589Ha ha ha so you can post a kiss scene from the ending or the prologue? They literally shake hands like Dekuck does lmao.
>posts actual tranny shit that both sides hateYou sure bridge the gap
>>286033656>Immediately responds Incredibly active in the fag thread I see. Why do you guys keep coming into homo threads if you want to pretend you aren't gay?
>>286033686Stop being retarded, holy fuck, they kiss in multiple chapters and are a couple at the end
>>286033707They have violated what is sacred, the Media Literacy!Death!Death!Dearh!
>>286033742nta, am I supposed to believe normal romance can't be slop?
>>286033586They never said this, they said they don't want to do commissions with this type of content, writing a serialization is a completely different matter.>>286033648They clearly do as they are specifically pointing this out, they are not doing a charity and it's not their job to employ a specific category of authors even if their work is compatible with them, they picked someone who they thought would do a good job in adapting the work and how is only following a script already presented to them.
Media Literacy: My song
>>286033833Cute friends
>>286033719A couple who don't kiss anymore and definitely does not have sex, very likely in an open relationship, Senpai most likely with someone from the same gender.>>286033722This isn't from the final chapter or the prologue lmao, I will repeat so you understand A-S-E-X-U-A-L ending, just like their audience.
>>286033794Again. If their not interested in Yuri elements, they shouldn't have accepted drawing for a series that contains it.
>>286033833Kokuhaku refugees…
>>286033811I think this isn't some black and white thing like a normal romance always being better than yuri and I think it depends on the writing, there are good normal romances, there are good yuri romances, there is terrible normal romances and there are terrible yuri romances
>>286033794They clearly have some creative freedom. See >>286032800. And adaptation should add something to the story, like the LN did. Sure, remove shit, so the story flows better, but there has to be something to justify its existence.
>>286033852>A couple who don't kiss anymoreAre you retarded? You mention this out of nowhere and without any proof to your claim, can you tell me when they say that they don't kiss anymore in the manga?
>>286033742I've seen you people post in other threads though. Stop pretending like the only reason you're here is because yuri was compared to straight manga. You guys are in every gay thread for "some reason" And yes I do think it's funny that when I responded to you you, you dropped everything to respond within 30 seconds in the gay thread you are apparently not interested in at all
>>286033854It doesn't matter what they are interest in, they are going to draw what the job requires them to, you don't need to be enthusiastic about something to be good at it.
>>286033884I think you guys might be as retarded for responding to very obvious bait.
>>286033915That would work if they didn't bring their anti-yuri bias into the manga
More media literacy
>>286033943>if it bothers you so much there's actually a whole board exclusively for you yurifags where you won't find any of us/u/ hates yuri if you don't know already
>>286033924Mikado is a gentleman and definitely did not groom Noi when they were 23-16 or even earlier.
>someone going to bat for straight romcoms>champions NagatoroJesus Christ dude, develop taste.
>>286033884>Said it got an asexual ending in my first post>Asexual anons talked about everything BUT the ending and now are trying to cope the goal posts movedHa ha ha >>286033901Not my fault the author FINAL impression of the series is that they are just an asexual couple, turns out their romance frizzed out very fast once they got together, can't blame the girl, she got together with a fucking faggot who cries over mild teasing, the author is considered a master of NTR hentai and it shows.
What a funny thread you have here.
>>286033766one could argue the manga ver is actually more media literate because they use the same brush.
>>286034029As much as I hate het romcoms, Nagatoro, for what it worth, was not that bad. Up until she became an obedient housewife
>>286033933They didn't. They are drawing exactly as the script they got from the high ups.
>>286034054Are you still shitposting with this? They don't end up together or have a romance, let it go. Go back to Gridman and Hibike where making fun of yurifags is easier and the truth
>>286033943>I am interested in btfoing delusional yuritards in this thread in specificWell let me know when you start, because every argument you've made in the 50 posts you currently have in the gay fag yuri thread are just versions of "nuh uh straight is better because I said so. Look at this mid manga I posted">It wasnt meOh OK. It must of been some other guy who currently is making up half the posts in a yuri thread. Gotcha
>>286034094You still think yurifags latch onto that? Scratch that, if you see any of those supposed """""yurifags""""", give them hell.
>>286034113Majiwives!
>>286034091The mangaka literally admitted to removing shit
If i want to watch the quintessential quintuplets whos gonna stop me? Yurifags are disgusting
>>286034067>And you're wrong, Nagatoro isn't asexual in the slightestExcept you know in the fucking ending of the series where they don't flirt, kiss, have sex and I don't think they even hug, a fucking handshake, a fucking handshake is what their relationship devolved into lmao, the whole series was just bait for NTR doujin the whole time, it's amazing.
>>286034054Kaguya is beloved by every yurifag while Jellyflop was reviled by the end of it thanks to the author going full retard, so yeah
How is some schizo retard baiting about nagatoro actually fooling you retards ? Come on man
>>286034146They only have so many pages to work with, it's literally what adapting means.
>>286034192They just want a reason to le epicly dunk on le big bad yurifag boogieman.
>>286034186>Can't even provide a single picture of the final or prologue because he hates it that muchlmao
>>286034113brilliant fusion of het and yuri.
while reading manga i like to self insert myself as the reader
>>286034127Well first off they are correct but second why am I seeing the same low effort "straight is better because I have low standards" posts I'm seeing from you that every closet case wanders into yuri threads to make?
>>286034285>brilliant fusion of het and hetFTFY
>>286034342Nah Chisato is the het one. Takina has arguments for being gay
>>286034288>>286034308Dump it.Also, I'm sure you aren't going to like it because you already have a bias against yuri, but why don't you, instead of replying to bait, read Hino-san no Baka? I've heard it's pretty similar to Nagatoro-san.
>>286030908Even the LR team (full of hetfags btw) refrained from doing such shit in their side materials.
>>286034360Takina is tsun for Majima
>>286034395>Chisato shipped Takina with an old man in the novelAre you sure?
>>286034395You mean for example the novel where Chisato tries to set up Takina with an old man? That's more het than anything in Kaguya will ever be.
is this yuri?
>>286034395Refrained from showing a girl clearly feeling uncomfortable?
>>286034429>>286033454
>>286034436absolutely
>>286034459>Chisato seemsSo it's not even confirmed unlike her actually trying to get Takina impregnated by an ojisan
>>286034493Can you dump Mimi Mix next? I miss that manga.
>>286034530sorry but i am a hino-san only dumper
>>286034395They are very devious hetfags, they even bothered to hire actual yuri mangaka for the anthology. And this, as we can see now, is a very, very difficult task.
>>286034766Anthologies aren't canon
https://x.com/hibimeshi_anime/status/2022324900825030963After the Christmas is the after party.After the party is the Valentine party.And after that you know it's Mako and Claire.And after that I say excuse me PA Works.And after that, we go back to yuri baiting.
>>286034956
>>286032417>posting fanart>there are no characters outside of Gojo and Marin thereThat's just blatantly wrong.
>>286034956The yuribaiting in this case comes exclusively from the twitter account, and only after the show got popular. The show itself had none of it, and that was a good thing since PA is so bad at it
>they made a kaguya manga specificially to btfo yuritroonshmm, based?
>>286033049So you'd literally fap to a scene of a woman and a man standing in a room together? Are you really going to hold up a banal act as the pinnacle of romance? Even if I accept the argument, why wouldn't it apply to friendship or even yuri series where the female characters are in the same panel as men? So why would anyone read romance manga in particular when almost every other manga does the exact same thing?
>>286035546They did a Christmas cover for Megami Magzine too. It is more than SNS.
>>286033656>The OP is literally stating yuri fag shit is better than straight romanceI didn't say that yuri is inherently better than straight stuff. I pointed out that those who say that yuri is a snooze fest often seem to watch romances where even less happens.
>>286036183You completely misunderstood my post, so I'm not even going to bother.
>>286032740Well, then it won't be difficult for you to point out the moment in the movie when the romantic nature of the MC’s relationship is unambiguously stated. There's no need to point out all 153 moments where possibly, very likely romantic nature of their relationship is stated ambiguously, I saw all of them perfectly well myself.
>>286033702Wait so yurifans are homosexual?
>>286036386Which part did I misunderstand? If you want to say that yuri doesn't do anything for you personally, that's fine. But the idea that two women can't replicate any dynamic between men and women is absurd because 2D characters are not bound by real life biology. You can swap a girl for a guy in a yuri manga (and vice versa) and nothing would change in the dynamics.
>>286036921>2D characters are not bound by real life biologyAre you talking about futanari now? I would agree that has a different feeling than normal yuri.
>>286032499>Thank god these honest chinese fans decided to harass herI give pass to many things but harassing am author is no no for me. Especially if it's a foreigner like a chink.
>>286037024What are you talking about?>there's certain dynamics between men and women that two women fail to mimicI'm addressing this claim. This can't be true because you can take any work, swap the sex of one of the protagonists, and still have the same dynamic between the two.
>>286026457Yuri isn't boring, you get drunk and watch them fantasizing about such love ;_;
>>286037134Just look at any genderbender story. It completely changes how things appear depending on what gender they are at the moment.
>>286026457In BL; the guys are having sex in the first chapter
>>286032172behead all chink subhuman
>>286037355This is just the narrative of the story, you could get the same effect without changing genders by whatever plot mechanic you want.
>>286037355Because genderbending is something that happens in the narrative itself. This change would happen before the story even begins. If you made Stark from Frieren this season into a girl from the very beginning, nothing would have to inherently change in his romance with Fern.
>>286032172ayyyy
The prodigal couple are returning.
>>286026457It sounds like you only care about types of romance written by women, since most yuri content is made by women. It's same with hetro shoujo/josei.
>>286037586Any orgy?
>>286034176I really wonder if going full yuri even would've saved Jellyfish at that point. It started off really strong, but boy that last arc sucked all the fun out of it.
>>286037902A strange question, considering that anything remotely resembling "full yuri" causes celebration online.
CK doujin idea. Iroha gets beaten during the "marry kaguya if you win" livestream and the winner, a middle aged ugly bastard virgin with a giant cock moves in. First half is Kaguya getting bred intensley, which Iroha watches and gets cucked, then Iroha joins in and they both get bred with some nice yuri kissing etc at the same time. Last page is side by side creampied and pregnant Iroha and Kaguya kissing with HAPPY ENDING
>>286038514lose weight
>>286038514Based
>>286026457Where are the ojisans?
>>286038734In heterosexual manga, fucking the protagonist's waifu off-screen.
>>286039675discord is even more cancerous site than reddit
>>286037788I hope not. The sequel already has too many.
>>286039814At least osananajimi will join the club, right?
Maybe im too woke, but without the chance of impregnation i can't see the appeal.
>>286040744I think yuri is popular because the girls can have sex without feeling "dirty", because no penis was involved at all.The romance also goes faster somehow.
>>286040794>>286040868Otaku who want that sort of thing don't want yuri. They watch shows where the girls aren't romantically involved with anyone.
>>286040960>Otaku who want that sort of thing don't want yuri.Yes they do.
>>286039464Ojisans are dangerous seeing how they can cross board. Yuris got to be tight with their loved ones, keep the Ojisan clueless yet satisfied while keeping their bonds tight with each other.
>>286041393Why would most of them watch yuri when the non-romantic option exists? I think you would also see more art like >>286041797, where the girls do yuri things and also get fucked by male self-inserts. Yet the artists who make yuri almost never double dip in that manor.
Realistically, nobody would care about a streamer who was famous for a few months 10 years ago
>>286041942>get fucked by male self insertsonly when they're separated/isolated from each other..
>>286043420I'm pretty sure those girls have had threesomes with guys.
Yuribait never wins
>>286043506Yeah, me
was this yuri?
>>286046121No
>>286039675>>286039785You're not wrong. They're also full of false yurifags who think Uma Musume is a yuri franchise despite that it's clearly made for hetfags. They think very horse girl is gay and the male trainers aren't self-insert. They and their spic admin even shit on someone for calling out on their bullshit, or more appropriately, horseshit. They label certain girls lesbians despite that they're subtext at best. Ironic that LGDfags are braindead losers who are very desperate to keep their kink relevant
>>286038514>>286038646
>>286049207I don't know what cygames intentions were, but I assume they probably weren't making it exclusively for hetfags, because if that was their goal they probably would've come up with an idea for a gacha game that didn't involve having to deal with the horse racing yakuza threatening to destroy their whole business every time someone on the internet uploaded a lewd image of their uma. It's a completely asexual franchise, as necessitated by the uma owners anyway so even if it was yuri it would be pointless anyway
Western fans hate Hayacoco because they have big tits or something despite being gachi yuri
>>286051358Because they’re gacha.
>>286051383They are gacha fans
>>286051383So are Uma Musume
>>286051422hayacoco is gacha
>>286051449Wow, just like Ave Mujica?
>>286051468idk maybe they find hayacoco boring even if it’s gachi?
>>286051603They explictly said they are problematic and for male gaze >>286051358
>>286051662Who is they?
>>286051691>>286049207
Yurifags have no right talk about muh kissless and sexless stuffSince their so call yuri have even more of that Heck the less lust there are in yuri, the more popular they are with the "yurifag"
>>28605192895+% of the works declared to be yuri by the publisher/author have a kiss.
>>286051928You are like 15 years too late anon, even fucking kirara has girls fingering each other now, meanwhile your shonen manga is doing exactly what happened with yuri with the author ending in subtext and then doing an interview to convince you if you think it's romantic it's just your interpretation and he never implied it.
>>286051928True, every yuri anime the fags go gaga over is pretty much like that Not true for manga and LN though Which pretty much made me believe that yurifags are split like yaoi and fujo types
>>286052246Recently Watanare author said as much, that the "shipping" yuri fans are not the people buying his series or romance yuri works.
>>286052246>>286052616There's a difference between what fans call yuri and what authors and publishers call yuri.
>>286052689Sometimes, you even have cases of the publisher not calling it yuri but the author does, though in this case he was literally talking about the people who ship female characters together.
>>286052616He says this with such confidence, as if he had conducted a sociological research and found that the multitude of "people who create derivative yuri content" and the multitude of "people who buy yuti-tagged works" do not overlap. It is a pity there was no room for this study in that rather lengthy interview, it would have been very interesting to see it.
>>286052973He has been publishing yuri for a long time, so I'm sure he has heard some concrete data over time aside from being part of yuri otaku culture himself, you know as opposed of people outside of the word doing long wall of texts about things they never experienced themselves.
>>286053640Surely he isn't the only person in the world who has been publishing yuri for a long time, heard some concrete data, was part of the yuri otaku culture, and so on. That is, one might expect similar statements from some other respected author. But instead, if you look at the early life of every third yuri author, you find derivative content on some idol/gacha shit or show for little girls. And if you really like generalizations and are disingenuous enough, this will certainly be a reason for the opposite statement that "shippers", "scrapfags", whoever are the flesh and blood of yuri culture.
>>286054094You are mixing two different things here, Teren is specifically talking about people who don't seek yuri works, they just enjoy shipping the characters, every single author or artist you are thinking about already enjoyed yuri works before, writing and drawing derivative works is how they expressed themselves back then.
>>286054317>Teren is specifically talking about people who don't seek yuri works, they just enjoy shipping the charactersWell, the only thing left is to find such people in statically significant numbers somewhere, besides Teren's head.
>>286051358Do they hate it more than fuwamoco
>>286054519It's 99% of shippers, otherwise yuri woulf sell well
Btw Hitler didn't buy yuri either, there is evidence that Ernst Röhm bought yaoi, which is why he was executed.
>>286052973>>286054094>>286054519Lmao this nigga is seething so hard
>>286056073>nigga>obsessed with thinking other posters are madHmm, wonder who this could be,
>>286054835So, the TL of an actual "shipper" person should look something like this:>90% ChisaTaki fanart>7% photos of their bookshelves, without a single yuri series>3% I fucking hate yuri postsLooks completely realistic, surely each of us has seen hundreds of similar ones.
>>286054811the most complaining and annoying protagonist in the world
>>286056194Considering how butthurt you are so far It's probably you
>>286056423I'm not even a person, just letters on your screen.
>>286026457Cool pitch, still not into it
>>286052616>>286052246Can confirm. There is a noticable gap between fans that ship characters in D4DJ and Hayacoco fans.
>>286026457>muh kissthat's boring
>>286054811Satsuki best girl, the rest are annoying and retarded.
>>286057138She's a cuck
https://x.com/izumi000/status/2022542324455391607Yuri?
Mietemasu yo! Aizawa-sanhttps://mangadex.org/chapter/4b6db686-b3bf-415f-89df-f0e41db2b2b5/1
>>286057657That character is very unambiguous into Miko, but unlikely to go beyond that
>>286061820Just say "bump"
>>286041797>keep the Ojisan clueless yet satisfiedMeaning?
>>286062017He is calling you a tranny
>>286041797Imagine a world based on mutualism where only yuri couples and ojisans exist. The ojisans maintain society allowing the yuri couples to freely express their love and helping them produce offspring and in return they receive sexual satisfaction from the couples.
>LGD tranny is desperate for attention>>286063339You see anon, the LGD thread on /h/ was revealed to be full of troons by their discord, which users hilariously cope saying it wasn't theirs because they made a cope post in the thread, it's a tranny fetish and it's why it's so unpopular.
>>286063607>thread police>"EVERYONE I DISAGREE WITH IS THE SAME PERSON/GROUP"You are basically "him" on meds.
>>286063845I wouldn't be surprised, this is the exactly the autistic type of stuff you expect troons to do.
>>286064091You fucking retarded troon, where did I disagree with you? I fully agree you enjoy drawings of "lesbians" getting fucked by guys, there is no debate here. I am just explaining your behavior which is offtopic for this thread, if you are afraid of scrutiny you just need to stay put in your own little thread on /h/.
>>286064161>talking about another poster's taste + low self-awarenessYeah. You are basically "him" on meds.Also I've never mentioned I like LGD.
Whoa. A new lore dropped.
>>286064329I disagree that fetish is directly related to a specific group of people here>>286063607
>>286064339Nta but there's nothing wrong with fictional polygamy. There's lots of immoral stuff in fiction. It's entertaining and interesting to see alternate lifestyles.
>>286064296>I am just defending this very specific offtopic fetish, why would you ever think I like it?You people of self mutilation really believe you are smarter than everyone else huh
>>286064339>Liking "LGD" means you have mental disorders as well."Agree. Fuck this anon >>278266799
>>286064511Not really. The good thing about fiction is that it can brush aside the wider social implications that polygamy would have and just focus on the entertaining intertangled relationships.
>>286064580>You people of self mutilationHoly schizo fregoli. You should know better how to R and I instead of being annoying schizoid thread police.
>>286064706>cheap and shallowWell, there are a bunch of idiots who enjoy BnHA, so?
>>286064696I am not your boyfriend schizo, because of you two I am the biggest supporter of banning VPNs
>>286064792>I am not your boyfriendI don't care. You are still an annoying thread police.
>>286064706Polygamy results in more interesting stories because of the added jealousy and conflict involved. A monogamous stort has more time to flesh out one relationship but a polygamous story can interplay relationships against each other to create a richer, more dynamic narrative.
uh oh
I'll be the spectator.
>stort
>>286064975This is just blatantly wrong. Stories where multiple parties are in conflict with each other create complicated relationship webs that monogamous stories by definition can't replicate.
>>286065105Yeah, right >>286064899
>>286065105>Freudian slipAre you saying all your typos are because you were rushing to samefag?
>>286064840>shonen shit>not shallowExplain?
>>286065258>Only mention of "stort" in this thread is your post.Is this "my" post >>286064975?
>>286065215>Explain why can't have jealousy Kek
>>286056244>>286056431Which is it?
>>286065215holy autism
>>286065215>Explain why can't have jealously over any numerous other topics.Not in romantic way, retard.
Finally a confession lads, fucking finally
>>286064869>boyfriend is a lgd trannyAt this point I am pretty sure you are the real lolcow obsessed with a mentally ill man.
Thousands of people decided to all leave /desu/ as my safe space.
>>286065365>>286065188
>>286065215Obviously because romance is about exploring romantic relationships. Romantic jealousy is the most poignant kind and enriches relationships in a way that jealousy over material goods can't achieve.
>>286065215>You literally are proving that you can't think creatively.Not me, the idiots who can't think of deep poly relationship.
>>286065429>Who says it has to be romanticSo you do admit there is a subject that can't be written into a monogamous story with better and more thoughtful plot direction.
>>286065504Romance stories are about romance. Diluting the story with non-romantic jealousy is just you confusing what genre is being discussed. When people sign up for romance, what they obviously want to see is romantic conflict. The kind of romantic conflict you can write between two people is fundamentally different from what you can write between 3+ people.
>>286065549>50% segmentsExcept in a true poly yuri.
Poly yuri is so popular now
>>286065670>Not a "deep" story element.Creativity issue.
>>286065452You are not wrong conceptually, he is obviously targeting you, this is something that actually happens, he spends a ridiculous amount of his day posting to specifically annoy you, so you calling out his behavior is expected at some level, but of course you also accuse other posters who like love triangles or poly or whatever bullshit you hate, this is just paranoia getting the best out of you. Personally I think he is honestly in love with you and I wouldn't doubt he is only waiting for the day you slip and leave out a way to track you so he can go to your home, rape and murder you, not necessarily in this order. I will literally donate money to any politician who will ban VPNs because of you two and I am pretty sure I am not the only one, normal people have no reason to use VPNs, only the ones abusing the system do and you made this very clear to me.
Renakowives
>>286065826>Hikikomari is not poly shitoh oh OH OHHOHOHOHOHO You do admit harem is not shit.
>>286065800I can't believe you are too retarded to understand that people want romance to be about romantic conflict. The bitterness of unrequited love and the happiness of achieving it contrast to create stories that can resonate with many people. Do you just have a deep trauma over getting cucked or something?
>>286065835Lmao. Is this a falseflag? It's 100% split between two people.
>>286066025100%, a lot of posters don't realize that they want porn instead of romance.they should crack open a vanilla doujin from e-hentai instead of whining about cucking constantly
>>286065893Harem bad, harem bad, Watanare is trash, whatever you want to hear, I don't give a shit enough about it either way, but I have posted about Watanare and you accused me of being him while I was just posting the anime which was airing, so no it's not always that retarded schizo who is in love with you, you are not hurting him, he wants your attention, he is in love with you, you are hurting everyone else who wants to get rid of him as much as you do.
>>286055011The next chancellor of germany only buys yuri.
>>286066157>vanilla doujinDon't mind me for posting a good vanilla doujin.
I'm smarter than Schrödinger.
>>286066098Fighting for love is just a part of life. Do you think your destined person will just wait for you? The struggle makes the final relationship more precious and cathartic.
https://x.com/watanare_anime/status/2022511033215258809
>>286066202What a cute picture. Only a deranged lolcow would even think of burning it
>>286066098If romance were about people doing nothing but expressing love, then it would be boring because there would be no development between the pairings. It is also unrealistic. All good stories have a conflict unless if they're porn
>>286027358age gap is kino
>>286066308Ah yes, the relationship with yourself. 1/1=0 tier moment
>>286066308By that logic then it's better to stay single because a couple would have 50 time/resources.
>>286063270>>286063270>>286062017Ah I see now. I guess I am now yuri fan too.
>>286066447>why must the struggle be romantic rivals?Because we are talking about romantic story? Are you mentally impaired?
btfo
>>286066447Because it's a romance story centered around romantic conflict. Do you have memory issues or something?
>>286066516>No one is saying you have a relationship with yourself.Then 3p should be 50% not 33.3%. Fucking idiot.
>>286066308>Strength of the relationship = time/resources put into the relationship.quintessential autistic loner moment. don't talk about things you are unable to comprehend.
>>286066516No the chart is about the love you have to give to a romantic partner. Does your reading comprehension problem extend to graphs too?
>>286066549See >>286066308Strength of the relationship = time/resources put into the relationship.You can only have so much time/resources in life/story.The total "pool" of time/resources is represented by 100%.If you have two people in that "pool" as a poly relationship you divide 100 by 2.100 / 2 = 50How are you this stupid?
>>286066587Romance being about romance isn't "circular logic". It's called a tautology, like A=A or B=B. Do you have 80 IQ or something?
>>286066663Left. Right resembles a complex couple relationship.
>>286066663The ingress and outgress of every node is 100%. No one gives 100% of what they have to someone else. The 100% is measuring what you have that's available to give to others. Did you drop out of high school?
>>286066308Epic post
>>286066740No it's about romantic conflict. Monogamous romance can only have it between 2 people. Harems can have it between 3+ people, creating more dynamic and interesting relationship interactions.
>>286066880Nope. Everyone gives 100% and receives 100%. Same as mono just with more people.
>>286066880>>286066926Hi, people
>>286066880Hey, people. Why are you ban evading then?
you are the so fucking stupid
This lolcow is too hilarious
sore asshole
>>286066985Are you blind? The graph literally tells you how. 3 people each giving 50% to 2 people.
Stinky plug
https://x.com/seishunrai/status/2022665259706961976
>>286066985>How can one person give two 100%s to two different peoplePeak retardation.>one person give one 100% to two different people = one person give two 50%s to two different people != one person give two 100%s to two different people
https://x.com/Next_toMountain/status/2022673954813677904
The Teyvat Brat is triggered
>>286067117Can someone (not the guy I'm replying to) answer if this guy has a genuine learning disability?
Greg O'Gallagher
>>286067174He once said that 1/1=0 so yes, he does in fact have a learning disability.
>>286067194>You can't give 100% to two people.Reading compression. Read again CAREFULLY.>one person give one 100% to two different people [IS EQUAL TO] one person give two 50%s to two different people [IS NOT EQUAL TO] one person give two 100%s to two different people
Big M
Only idiots associate uncountable with infinite.
My hungry anus feels addressed by the word "break"
>>286067263>>286067375So you do agree that parents with more than a single child is shallow.Also you can only love either your mom or dad, not both of them because otherwise your love is shallow.
1/1=150%+50%=100%
this guy is really trying to quantify human relationships. peak autism
>>286067518double tag
>>286067518>Platonic love and romantic love are not the same thing. "because I said so"
Hold on, lemme hurt your feeling.
>>286067625You can't quantify human relationships, autismo.
>>286067980HOT
>>286067856No you can't. If you weren't autistic you'd know that instinctively. A 'strong relationship' comes in many shapes and forms and each is different, you'd also know this if you ever had one.
Shaky thread
>>286067548>One person can give two 100%sSaid by literally no one but you ever.
Does it hurt?
>>286068078Keep coping, virgin boy. Calling things you don't understand tranny doesn't change the reality. Go out and get some friends and maybe even girlfriends. You are a wizard already, come on.
>>286068157>no mention of "two 100%s" in that postReading compression.
>>286068323>One person gives 100% and receives 100%>One person can give two 100%sNot even remotely similar.
>>286068178Iroha is so lucky...
>>286068323Lmao. Everyone gives 50+50=100% and receives 50+50=100%. Not everyone gives 100+100=200%. Can you not read? It's literally in the graph too.
>>286068430Cute Tapwife
>>286068571>So you're admitting polyshit is shallow.Sure, after you admitted you were wrong about your "two 100%s" assumption.
>>286068647It's deeper because all 3 girls work together to support each other. Rather than being additive, true poly is multiplicative. It's similar to how having 2 parents is overall more fulfilling than 1 parent, even though your love is split between them.
>>286068678Reading compression.See >>286066946>Same as mono just with more people.
Imagine Sean on a date kek
>>286068795Again, reading compression>Same as mono JUST WITH more people.Honestly funny how you just refuse to ever admit you're wrong.
>>286068817He would start calling the girl Akemi as soon as she disagrees on anything with him
I condone polygamy.
I condemn polygamy.
Keep dancing.
>>286068928>So what's the poly relationship have the "same as" of a mono relationship?Give 100% and receive 100%. Why are you this stupid?
Break soon
This picture is like a gun, it hurts.
>>286069325Your anus twitches like crazy when you see the word "break", doesn't it?
>>286069325I only mentioned "Give 100% and receive 100%" though. Why are you this stupid?
when I say "break" you think of "men's assholes"
I don't care but I need a break.
Broken python bot
>>286069440>one person gives 100>one person gives 50 twiceIS NOT THE SAME
50*2 =/= 100
>>286069573No wonder he dropped out of bioengineering
I want to buttfuck Sean's slutty asshole with my huge dick and pump it full of semen
>>286069667Right. Idiot gets confused when people said give 50 twice is the same with give 100 once.
tow people relationship
>>286069755Nope, it's for the lolcow who buys and reviews buttplugs on Amazon aka Aromi
>>286069742And I was right. See >>286069667>50*2=100>one person gives 50 twice = one person gives 100
All I know is that ojisans of taste are the biggest supporters of yuri
>>286069880lose weight
Thanks for taking out the trash, mods
