[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Settings Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

Attention: All work safe boards are soon going to be on the 4channel.org domain.

For now, all boards are accessible through either domain.

Make sure to update your script blockers and whitelist the new domain.

The 4chan Vtuber Competition is over. Click here to see the winning entry!

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: Herodotus.jpg (2.58 MB, 1739x2100)
2.58 MB
2.58 MB JPG
This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged.

For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/.

/his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character.

When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.

File: 1532142023330.png (78 KB, 255x271)
78 KB
If you went back in time and told ancient people about people from the future, who would they find more interesting?
9 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
Are you legitimately retarded?
Says the retarded burger worshiping corporations and authoritarians.
File: 1530022661947.jpg (34 KB, 500x500)
34 KB
>stating that Musk and Zuckerberg are regarded as extremely succesful is worshiping corporations and authoritarians
This will be my last reply, have a fitting bait image to go along with it
>Trump poster
I knew you were fascist scum from the beginning
I fucking hate this image.

File: 1519773788992.jpg (115 KB, 740x576)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
No ship thread? Let's have a ship thread. Post your favourite warships. Any period is fine, although I prefer WW1-WW2 myself.
Try to keep it civil and keep the spazzing to a minimum.

For me, it's the HMS Hood
161 replies and 38 images omitted. Click here to view.
>save a useless hunk of metal that was never used again and scrapped after the war.
It was actually fully repaired, which was the reason it wasn't used (because they wanted to give it a re-fit, which never happened).
In theory.

I practise, they couldn't hit a damn thing.
They fixed that. Delay coils basically cut the dispersion in half, and both Richelieu and Dunkerque class battleships ended up just as accurate than any other BB of the era.
What exactly was the issue with them?
File: belfast-IMG_0496.jpg (175 KB, 1000x750)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
The guns being placed too close together caused excessive dispersion because of the wake effect of the muzzle blast affecting the initial trajectory. This is something all nations using multiple-gun turrets had to independently identify and fix. Solutions included firing in half-salvoes (like older Japanese dreadnoughts), offsetting the gun barrels within a turret (like the British town class cruisers, see pic) or installing delay coils so that one gun of a turret fires a few milliseconds after the others, which was the sollution preferred for USN battleships, Japanese cruisers and Yamato-class, and eventually the french and british. It was a straightforward fix and not really something that makes or break a surface ship's usefulness. Richelieu's fire control was quite effective besides that.

File: vO7lRZ7.png (56 KB, 621x702)
56 KB
>Thats a white haplogroup
29 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
I wonder if Haplotards think Sudan is "Nordic" because it was 2-10% I Y-DNA

These people are fucking idiots.
I have unironically seen polish anthrotards say this
actually they say it because sudan/chad has some r1
I like Polish autist the most desu, his posts are entertaining in a way that he genuinely believes in his bullshit and constantly makes new theories about it, while Nordicists are just ironic shitposters and Haplotards are for the most part simply wewuzing R1b Europeans with inferiority complex.
>They dont tell us a single piece of information about race because most haplogroups are 30-50k years old.
Not really.
I diverged from IJ 29-33k B.C
I1 and I2 split 1000-3000 B.C
Many I1 subclades are about 2000 years old
Further subclades can show you whether you and someone else share the same father or grandfather (naturally this involves looking at more markers since the subclade isn't very distinct from others genetically)

So did the Ancient Greeks view themselves as a sort of post-post apocalyptic society due to the fact that the Minoan civilisation is represented as like this lost advanced civilisation in Greek myths?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
No they saw Minos as a degenerate tyrant
Only the Athenians did. The rest saw Minos as a super righteous dude who was appointed as a judge in the underworld after his death.

well, the whole bronze age collapse was a major even that shaped the world view and mythos of the people living in the eastern meditarenian
That was Dantes
You mean Dante? If so, no it fucking wasn't.

Was it autism /his/?
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
yeah pretty much
ur brain cant handle diverse situations happening in real life in real time?
Germany still had sabre cavalry in 1939
oprikniks used a fucking broom. depends on ur opponent/power distance
>Clinging to your traditional means in a world change
>Having the ability to slice incoming bullets AND the torsos of the enemies
>Being able to attack the enemy lines with a Supernova when reaching his Limit Break

I'd say he was pretty based, and quite redpilled

Were the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials a victors justice? Reading about all of this, it's baffling how the allies created new laws to retroactively condemn the axis. I'm not denying the axis commited war crimes and deserved to be punished, but there is something off about all of this.
56 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
They were far too lenient in the case of Nuremberg. Every German or Austrian member of at least the SS should have been executed.
>Every German or Austrian member of at least the SS
Why spare all the other members of the SS?
they dindu nuffin
Some of the foreigners were conscripted. Most should also be executed though, especially the ones from northwest Europe.

Is it fair to say Heuy long is the most Wholesome dictator of all time?
File: 1542153520477.jpg (107 KB, 706x852)
107 KB
107 KB JPG

File: 220px-Karl_Marx_001.jpg (24 KB, 220x278)
24 KB
Is Marxism defensible as an economic model?
10 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>unironically falling for the subjective marginal utility meme
>haha I called a fact a "meme" guess what you lose kiddo
Subjective marginal utility is literally a market fact. Want to know how I know that you didn't study economics?
Marxism (i.e. scientific socialism) isn't an "economic model".
is ops mom defensible from my massive firehydren dick
>it’s literally a market fact
Hmmm I think you should read more behavioral economics. Wanna know how I know you took intro to macro and then either never took another Econ course or blindly studied econometrics without bothering to critically examine the theoretical and philosophical foundations of marginalism?

File: 1528575487122.jpg (98 KB, 1000x800)
98 KB
>study history
>become a left leaning nationalist
How should i label my beliefs so that i don't come across as a literal nazi which i believe would be quite counterproductive in this day and age?
28 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>nationalist union
Doesn't compute
poland is such a cringey nation haha I'm glad most of their history is composed of suffering under some foreigner's boot
Fuck off, Poland is really nice and most Poles are also cool dudes. Shame they tend to be absolute fucking faggots around here though
Maybe just nationalist/patriotic/whatever?
Leave the left or right out of it, pic and choose with which side you're aligned with depending on the subject.

File: image.jpg (239 KB, 432x619)
239 KB
239 KB JPG
This is Ivan the Terrible and his son Ivan, look into Ivan the Terrible’s eyes
18 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
a young Russian soldier who made the ultimate sacrifice defending Stalingrad, November 1942
yeah no shit he just killed his son
Because he wasnt bad compared to european kings
And he doesnt kill his son
You guys are pieces of shit.
My fucking sides

File: MENA.png (70 KB, 700x400)
70 KB
>study ancient history
>become a MENAcentrist
Who else?
>"study" history (skim wikipedia and google books snippets)
>become bigbrained
>post on /his/
Who else?
Most people here
became interested in Sumer, Babylon, Assyria and Carthage before Greece and Rome so I guess me

File: 130981-004-41DDEE12.jpg (73 KB, 525x525)
73 KB
Why is it that, when it comes to colonization such as the Belgian Congo case, we're always thought about greatly exaggerated or even made up scenarios? Surely if they wanted to show how "evil" the Europeans were, they'd have something to show for it, right?
34 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
No, I haven't even seen a second of your video. I did look through the main points of the video he linked though, and they are all just speculation and assumptions.
The only argument he could possibly have made to objectively prove that the number is wrong was with population, but that's wrong as well and based on, like I said, mis-used stats.
Meant blog, not video.
Explain how he misused the stats, because you're making a clear claim here.
First off he took estimates of total population of 1850 and 1900 and made a linear trend to get the population of 1885. Now this would be fine if you're just using the population numbers for a minor thing, but that's what his whole argument. In short he's using objectively wrong estimates and presenting them as facts.
Now here's the worse part. He took the population density of ALL of Africa -- a very geographically diverse place -- and applied it to the Congo. I hope I don't have to explain further how that is completely non-sensical.
>because while killing 1 million was possible, the fact that the first charge against the congo free state of 10 million was impossible shows this whole thing was kind of a scam
By this logic, most systematic mass murders of the 19th and 20th century were scams, because they are largely overestimated, often based on historical guesstimonials.

His statements regarding the european treatment of the Congo issue are mostly correct. However, the rest, I mean, the wild population estimations that underestimate the Congo's population density at the earliest point and then overestimate it at the latest point, those are pretty bad. The 1885 estimate of the congolese population is calculated by using the guessed population density of all of africa, and then the 1900 estimate does not do so, but instead substracts large portions of north africa, large swaths of desert countries with low population densities. It doesn't take a mathematician to know what effect this has.
Afterwards, there's the large conjectural what-if's, which we cannot ascribe any credibility to, because they are not evidence of anything.

Did the Nazis "backstab" the Soviets?

Did the Soviets have no ill-intention against them like they say?

I'm not sure what to think about it.
29 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
Nazis and Soviets didn't like each other but as global pariahs they agreed to trade with one another. It wasn't so much of a betrayal as the Soviets thinking the inevitable war would happen much later after a buildup of inevitable tensions, not a sudden invasion.
The Soviets were actually benefiting politically from playing along with German ambitions with the absorption of the Baltic states, Eastern Poland, Karelian isthmus and Bessarabia, I'd hardly call it appeasement like West where all they did was let Hitler get whatever he wanted for nothing except a piece of paper and a pinkie promise
>back up my claim that Stalin wanted a deal with a western power and he didn't really care which one
Hmm. >>5677294
>Him taking no actions to invade or even make a deal with the Allies prior to June 22, 1941
If you're that hung up on dates, Soviet Union already had a treaty of mutual assistance with France(signed May 2, 1935, ratified March 27, 1936
), and following that, a treaty of mutual assistance with Czechoslovakia (signed May 16, 1935), which only went into effect if France helped them first, except Munich. :^)

>Just give up your hero Stalin was fine with Hitler at least for the time being
He was fine with European imperialists beating the piss out of each other. As am I. Shame about casualties from the invasion of France being so low, though.

The amendment regarding Lithuania was due to Soviet already starting to meddle in what was agreed to be German sphere of influence.
>If you're that hung up on dates

I am yes, history is largely about dates. Stalin wasn't shopping around for western allies after Molotov-Ribbentrop, but he would have been perfectly happy BEFORE Molotov-Ribbentrop with an alliance with Britain and France. Stalin wanted an alliance with a western power to ensure the USSR didn't get fucked with and he wasn't picky. Once he had Molotov-Ribbentrop he felt fairly secure.

>He was fine with European imperialists beating the piss out of each other.

Stalin also wasn't particularly keen on a war in the foreseeable future. Maybe in a decade or so he would think differently but as of June 22 1941 Stalin was fine with bribing Germany with raw materials to leave him alone.
File: 1430911421_144468619.png (150 KB, 591x253)
150 KB
150 KB PNG
Literally picrelated

What’s the point of preserving historical artifacts if they will all one day be lost?

Why not just take a picture and then destroy it to hinder illegal markets from cropping up?
8 replies omitted. Click here to view.
or america could stop founding sandnigger barbarians blowing up thousands of years of art history in the middle east
Is that a chinese dragon on a roman fresco?
Brazilian or British posters have arrived
whats the point of being alive if you will one day die
we live in a society
not an argument

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.