Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
post photos you've taken on expired filmpicrel is 1000iso 3m colorslide that expired in 1984[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3119Image Height2075
>>429576770mm Mystery film I got with my linhof cine back. Dark green backing. Thin negatives at 50 iso. I suspect it is a 12 or 25 speed film at this point.When I get my dev kit I will develop more of the film. It's kinda cool...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5262Image Height3425Image OrientationUnknown
ultramax expired in 2006 shot in 2021 and developed last summer
this came from a mystery disposable I found at my mom's house, pretty sure it's from my sister's high school trip so some time in the late 2000's if I had to guess. The camera was missing the paper wrapping so no idea what kind of film was in it or when it expired[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3089Image Height2048
>>4295913[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3089Image Height2048
>>4295767kodak ultramax 400 expired 2005 shot around 2015
Off-Topic EditionPrevious thread >>4293098/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4296272But how razor fucking sharp this shapshit is!
>>4296024Cleaning very well the reel after use helps a lot as well in my experience, in case you haven't been doing it
>>4296273Okay, documentarian. Have fun creating your catalog of leaves and rocks you found on the ground.
>>4296273Why thankyou.>>4296280That's a tree, dickhead.
>>4296024Clean your reels, don't use photoflo with reels (take the film off the reel and just put it in the tank with photoflo)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
I'm really interesting in getting back into Theatre Photography like to get some hits, tips and advice on what would be some good ideas and ways to go about approaching it againthank you
>>4294793pay attention to a histogram next time and stop blowing out your highlights
>>4294796this isn't my photo is just one I found to use as an example
>>4294796lol I hope you're ready to do uniWR if you're going to trust thosebetter method? meter for highlights, know your DR and increase exposure the amount of stops you know won't blow them. You need to know your camera but after you get the hang of it it becomes second nature.
>>4294889this guy gets it
>>4294793I want to smell all those feet
>tfw you remember your Sony phaseWhat are you guys shooting now that you've moved on to cameras that aren't the photographic equivalent of working a corporate desk job?
>>4296141>this postLose weight[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width479Image Height513Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4296193I look like this and I say things like that
God showed His love toward us when He sent His Son Jesus Christ, to die on a cross, then three days later Jesus Christ God brought Him back to life. He promised that whomsoever believes on Jesus Christ , God will give them eternal life in Heaven, when you ask Him to forgive us of our sins.
>>4296127>those colorspukerinooooo
>>4296127>those colorspurekinooooo
Redkon editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY -https://textbin.net/evqhpcl2jy>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4273759Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4295450>3ccd Based. Cinema will always be fake until they start to develop and employ 3 chip cameras.
Some retards just got an arri alexa mini camera so expect a very cinematic film staring trumps very special child to be made soon. She is so special that she can tie her own shoes and count to potato but I will be filmed on an arri and not on a potato.
my g85 has AWFUL video autofocusi do wildlife, mainly birds with 800mm telephoto handheld onlyusing MF basically always causes shaky footageis there anything to help with MF other than a follow focus?you cant really use it with a long lens handheldor do i just have to get a g9II for the video autofocus
>>4296271Plot twist is that the girl from red is a lawyer who’ll sue your pants off if she catches you using an atamos recorder to record video raw externally.
Will the Z6II/7II ever get firmware updates? Or are they just going to drop a new camera in lieu of an update?Also Nikon general
>>4296218post link? nigga do you think I save every fucking link of every goddamn thing I ever read in a huge indexed spreadsheet in case some tard wants to read it but not enough to be bothered to look it up on his own? Fucking hell son, if you're interested, you go find it, it's not my damn job holy god damn
>>4296220>Go watch random dpreview videosI don't hate myself that much. Literally everything associated with that shit site is wrong or irrelevant to sane people.
>>4296213I think it's more the limitation of software engineering (my bet is that camera firmware is heavily single threaded) than two processors being too bad. I can understand why nikon decided to not touch the code and make it parallel.At this point I just wait for the Z6III. The Z6II AF is ok but it could be better (3yo kid running around in low-ish light is pretty much the end boss for an AF system).Also my kid dropped(threw it through the room lol) the cam and the IBIS seems bricked for focal lengths above 60mm. It just stops working when I move the camera too quickly too far and I have to turn camera off and on. But I don't care as IBIS is useless for me and I almost never use a focal length longer than 50mm. My longest focal length is the 105mm macro which is going to MPB tomorrow because macro photography is mental illness.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1100Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmImage Width2012Image Height3024RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4296201what would 36mpx allow that 24mpx doesn't? I mean for internet it's ant-resolution anyway so an 8mpx cam would do. For print? 24mpx prints fine on A2. If 24mpx sucks on A1 then my guess is that those 30% more resolution won't make 36mpx magically good on A1. (But my guess is that you can print 24mpx on A0 anyway because most people won't push their nose into a print).IMHO all you get from slightly higher resolution is less hard drive space.
>>4296277megapixels vs print size in inch @ 300 dpi
Dear god, even Gerald is Dunking on Fuji onions. Why don't these people realize that they aren't 'misunderstood', they are just unlikable pretentious cunts on a budget since they'd all desperately like to shoot Lecia instead.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngqu_qZSLV8&t=450s
>>4295826Pentax and olympus film shooters are probably 80% furries[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height1200Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4295817how did you get this picture of me without the dog hair on it?
>>4295824Most 40k fans are furries. When i played magic with my sister (she needed an escort so she wouldnt get molested) the nerds called it warhammer furry-kay.
>>4295756You're talking to a tripfag that has literally never posted a single photo in his 100 years of posting here
>>4294355Get both.I got fuji first. now I have fuji and sony.
I've become friends and also the cameraman with an onlyfans girl, I mentioned I did film production in Uni and then got offered to help direct/film a scene and now I'm her go-to person for shooting. The thing is, I'm most comfortable with pre/post production, so despite sitting in classes for it due to various reasons I'm currently mediocre at lighting and camera setting stuff. Thankfully they all have some basic lights and microphones so I haven't had to invest money in, but if I can make a solid enough video in future I could make this a decent side gig, but my friend/client is ambitious and wanting to work up to "pornhub quality". Has any other anons ended up shooting amateur porn or photoshooting adult models and what gear should I be getting and how can I make up my production quality enough so I get hired by her friends. All I have personally is a canon 200d w/18-55mm lens and a tripid alongside a bounce kit, she has a Nikon Z 30 w/tripod and ring lights mostly.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1600Image Height2400Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2018:12:28 14:04:41Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1504Image Height2256
>>4293346I agree but I meant in the sense of being pestering with it.
>>4291722>hitting her goalsWhich were?
>>4254917>airbnb>homeownerThe odds of it actually being someone's home and not just a paralegal hotel these days are pretty much fuck all.
>>4293218Well, congratulations. But it looks like it could become your main gig.
>>4264915what the fuck are you dorks talking about she's still pretty hot
which one would be the best one to go for, more to the point I'm making here is which one would you say stands out the most as being the one that has the best performance in most of it's functions and settings?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4296262I didn't ask because I think it's shit, but because I see Pentax bashed regularly. Why is that?
>>4296257The II is awful, what makes 1 better?Also >no evf
>lightweight>1kg body
>>4296263It's a fine camera. It has a couple downsides and quirks, like every camera, the chief complaints being that it bakes in noise reduction to raws, but this isn't dissimilar from Sony baking in vignette correction, but no one cares about that. In reality it's because most of this board hates DSLRs and so they were never going to use it anyway so it's a free punching bag
>>4296263Why people specifically hate Pentax is a complete mystery to me, so you'd have to ask them. They aren't class-leading in anything, so I guess if you're looking to buy something it doesn't make sense on paper. But the reality is that they are more than good enough as all cameras have been since 2013. But people love to fixate on charts and numbers rather than how those numbers affect use (aka they don't)
Alright /p/, what is the best way to make money with a camera (ideally without shooting weddings because I really dislike that)?Let's say ideally the position has a path to ~100k a year. Is it Real Estate Photography? Product photography? Starting a youtube channel? Video marketing for local brands?How do YOU make money with your camera?
>>4296208>(fake ally)>justifies it with republican tribalism argument: trust me guise I'm a democrap believe meeeejfc you tryhard fucktard suck a bumpy dick, ruzzias gonna be covered in glass and ash before it gets to keep Ukr. And good riddance to the primitive apes.
>>4296216propaganda bot.
>>4296217>friendless uneducated chinky ruskie sadfuck>that always posts russian propaganda and 1930s total jew conspiracy theories>is upset.Just another day on 4chins I see.
>think i could make money as a photog in mexico?>nah maybe they're broke>HELLO PHOTOGRAPHY BOARD! FUCK TRUMP! FUCK PUTIN! WE NEED TO HATE RUSSIA AND RUSSIANS OR THEY ARE GOING TO DESTROY ALL OF EUROPE BECAUSE THEY ARE JUST EVIL YOU HAVE TO HATE THEM I AM SO ANGRY WHO"S WITH MENATO propaganda isn't real, they said
>>4296204America will become balkanized, karma is a bitch innit? Destroy unions only to have your own inevitably collapse as you watch impotently. Texas is already defying the supreme court, that thing tends to happen when you have a government occupied by those hostile to the people they rule over. Meanwhile Putin wins in an 88% landslide.
Please share your images taken with long focal lengths.>i bought pic related last week300mm FF equivalent or longer only.NO test shots of street furniture thankyou, only images you left the house to shoot.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.22Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height2048
>>4296170anon…
>>4296157Very kool kit aside from the chinese toy tripod.Do you have any more photos taken with that 300mm?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40XCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern5592Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:11:17 10:41:42Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/6.7Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width0Image Height0RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used100Color ModeCOLORImage QualityFINEWhite BalanceSUNNYImage SharpeningMED.HFocus ModeMANUALFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested100Tone CompensationNORMALLens TypeNikon G SeriesLens Range18.0 - 400.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/6.3Auto FocusCenterShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeLandscape sRGBLighting TypeNATURALNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations26493Image OptimizationVIVIDSaturation 2ENHANCED
>>4296168Yes.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Created2023:08:31 15:08:53Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height1080
>>4296180I never could figure out what to do with it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-007Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:10:26 10:12:06Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3637Image Height2433
Fat squirell editionold>>4289768
>>4296085kys
>>4295921Well...thanks![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T8iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:03:16 14:56:27Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T8iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:03:13 19:37:39Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width853Image Height1280
post ur train/station/tracks pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 13:51:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2011:04:13 23:25:49Exposure Time43 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramUnknownISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4294264Based
>>4294282>>4294242Based basedposters
HP5 +2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.01.005 (220831)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:22 15:41:23Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3600Image Height2400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-GX8Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2023:09:11 13:32:03White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5200Image Height3904Exposure ModeAutoImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
How would you get the Eggleston look on digital? shoot during sunset, pick colorful subjects, bump up the saturation, increase contrast, deep black levels, maybe add some grain...what else?
>>4296113If you are looking at Eggleston's work on a screen it doesn't make a difference. What made his colors special is that he used a unique dye-transfer process for his prints which allowed for a wider color gamut than a typical print. They were supposedly impressive when viewed in person.
>>4296113In trying to find a reason to care about photography, shit like this does not help. Just because you made a fucking image does not mean everyone else needs to see it. As a collage of visual elements, the vertical aqua green gradient against the blue horizontal gradient is enough. The decision to include the powerlines is the only question and it's not worth listening to the answer, because the red diagonal is so predictable it fills me with mild irritation and such lethargy I can't even care enoug
>>4296219>Nepotism beneficiaries nonart doesnt helpThe retard produced non-artistic novelties and got into galleries because of who his friends were. The mid 20th century "art" world onwards contains a lot of shit that is objectively not art>inb4 art is subj-No.Fucking ripoffs of old paintings make for better photos than most of what got into galleries then
>>4296173I have news for you... inkjet printers are actually dye transfer print machines. You've seen a gazillion dye transfer prints. This was a novelty, specifically a tech demo, in its day but true art endures and doesn't need explanations about the state of fucking printing technology to be good.Imagine praising a photographer because he was the first to suck enough dicks to have the first XXXXmegapixel photo in a "fine" "art" gallery.>It was the highest resolution camera at the time!That's more or less most of steven shore's portfolio.
>>4296225anyone who has seen any film in technicolor has seen the exact same thing. exact. >you have to see the original dye transfer print!!!!!modern inkjets have a wider gamut and can replicate dye transfer prints perfectly ffs. it wasnt just a tech demo it was trying to add a layer of craftsmanship (marketing) to worthless snapshits because large dye transfer prints were done by hand.