Go /p/ro.Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread. Do Not Want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki
Trichromatic edition (strong filters are better for color according to PhaseONE, Kasson is WRONG)https://youtube.com/watch?v=HHM-vp9lWkkPrevious national tragedy thread: >>4532911
>>4533999>People agree your basic theory about reach is valid.Thanks for the concession, better late than never.>>4533999>Panasonic is the only brand where zero cameras have AA filtersAt least with them you can retrofit one.
>>4534000We're paying gulfies to stay neutral and not destroy israel. The very lines on the map were drawn to keep them neutral. This is literally why iran is bombing them instead of bombing israel.>>4534001...But your theory doesn't account for the expense of actually getting that "reach" as a passable photo. And thank you for tacitly admitting you're moire spammer. Please look outside and notice all these mirrorless cameras you say are bad, are in common use in real life and are only bad in a few incompetent test shots on dpreview. If you actually owned a camera and didn't just borrow your dads once to attempt astronomy (poorly) you'd know how easy it is to avoid false color and moire issues.
>>4533957>Of course a paranoid schizophrenic like him isn't going to show what he's using the extra reach for, for all we know he's sneaking around in a Ghillie suit near some building he suspects of some conspiracy to enslave humanityThis is just stupid nonsense>and put mirrorless processors connected to our retinas to fake the moon landing or some shit like that.What do you think their endgame is? The desert of the real is coming, coppertop. I won't speculate on the technical implementation of it but AI will either enslave or exterminate humanity given enough time, and bread and circuses will shield the masses from reality. You shouldn't be so jolly ridiculing the idea. I'm not a schizo, just ahead of the curve.
>>4534004Get a fucking job
>>4534003>We're paying gulfies to stay neutral and not destroy israel. Because your government is occupied by them. You also bombed children in Iran for Israel and you started this stupid war only for Israel's benefit and Trump even admitted as much to Tucker.>And thank you for tacitly admitting you're moire spammer.I'm not "moire spammer", schizo. I do agree with him on OLPFs and I don't cope with C1 like you do.>...But your theory doesn't account for the expense of actually getting that "reach" as a passable photo.That will depend on the amount of pixels on the target. A moon photo with the same lens taken with a 90D and a full frame Canon is more detailed on the 90D every time.>Please look outside and notice all these mirrorless cameras you say are bad, are in common use in real life and are only bad in a few incompetent test shots on dpreview.Not all shots will show every camera's flaws just like not every X-tranny shot has immediately noticeable worms or watercolor effect on the foliage. Artifacts exist and they often show up in the worst moment so why not prevent them?>If you actually owned a camera and didn't just borrow your dads once to attempt astronomy (poorly) you'd know how easy it is to avoid false color and moire issues.Nice fanfic
Previous:>>4531544
>>4533842>Photo has any sort of saturation>OH MY GAWD ITS KEN ROCKWELLI’m sorry you’ve got a beige life but you shouldn’t be afraid of color
>>4533842"cinematic" sony luts have ruined your brain
>>4533951Thats a beautiful picture I was gonna post one of my snapshits but dont want to anymore. Baroque is truly the greatest style only gothic comes close
alright now you have no excuse not to be using photoshop and(or) lightroom
>>4533817The more data the better. You'd be amazed how much information is collected from every single corporate made piece of software you use and every single website you visit. Even things like your mouse movements and keystroke dynamics are collected and fed to LLMs to create a detailed profile on you. Until recently this was impossible but now with modern LLMs and all those huge data centers being built all over US there is finally nothing stopping the big brother from processing every last bit of information that can be collected on you. You don't need to be interesting or "on a list" anymore. They can profile and track the whole population now. Welcome to the future. It's like your ghost in the shell animus but without cool neons and cyber limbs. It's all just dirty, gray, boring, corporate sponsored government surveillance. The most mundane and unexciting type of dystopia.
>>4533822The difference is there's evidence that the chinks inject malware whenever they can and this was programmed using chink AI, you're just throwing an accusation against adobe because you presumably wanted to work at adobe but they hired a jeet for 50 rupees an hour instead
>>4533939>this was programmed using chink AI,'In announcing those new apps on Reddit earlier this week, software developer Brandon Thomas said he used Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 to create “clean-room replacements” for Adobe’s closed source software in Rust (with WebAssembly versions available for use in a browser).' t. Ars Technica article. Anthropic is from the States. Go back to /pol/
>>4533944Oh so it isn't the CCP but the company that one of the key people quit because it was evil, got it.I think I would rather risk the CCP, at least it won't claim my house is a military target like Claude does with civilians.
>>4533950>because it was evilidk man using AI to bomb muslims isn't evilin the future we wont even have to worry about that because everything from the red sea to persia will be israel and iran will be a no-go zone to keep the jeets out
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.Post your night photos!
>>4533680Can't see shit tho...
I tried my first nighttime long-exposure shot about a month ago. 10 seconds at 200mm, f/9.5, and Canon's version of ISO100.
>>4533931I can't decide on which crop I prefer.
>>4533931>>4533934i like the first one but the second pic is easier on the eyes
>abandoned but there’s a pickup parked there
Crop dat shit nigga
Gigantic Pentax news!https://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info2/2026/20260909_042557.htmlShortened takeaways from the pentaxforums summary:1) More Pentax DSLRs are coming. Ricoh is committing to "a new series of digital SLR cameras based on an entirely new concept," built on the K-mount legacy.2) Current K-series production is ending.3) It may be a while.
What is th better normal zoom for my K-3 3? The DA 16-50/2.8 SDM or the DA 20-40 Limited?
>>4526873Welcome to /p. Please use the gear thread.
>>4533741you must be new here
>>453374020-40 is the better lens in terms of image quality for artsy things but the other one is much more useful for work
this says to me they're retiring k-mount system and making a new system that will continue to be backwards compatible with k-mount lenses. whether it's a shorter-flange DSLR system or mirrorless, hard to tell. but my money is on mirrorless that will mimic the SLR experience very hard. DSLR tech is just too prohibitive now
I went in at midnight because the garage is the only room in the house where failure is permitted. I mixed the developer wrong and knew it and poured it anyway. I cut the paper in the dark and cut my thumb and bled on the back of the sheet which is now part of the archive. I put it in the tray and stood there the way you stand in a hospital corridor, doing nothing, which is the most you can do. I rocked the tray and watched the paper and the paper showed me nothing and then showed me everything at once the way time works when it finally decides to move. I pulled it too early because I always pull it too early, because waiting feels like trusting something that has not yet earned it. I hung it dripping on the line I strung between the shelving unit and the water heater and stood back and the garage smelled like chemicals and the image was not right and I was already planning to do it again tomorrow.
this is an ai picture
>>4533946which one?
lol you also used ai to write this
How come no one posts here?Photography is a pretty big hobby, and it has become very fashionable to shoot film in recent years, so why is this board completely abandoned?
>>4533882>thinks camera operation is all that photography is. The camera is a tool like a paintbrush is a tool.
>>4533886Thats not what he meant by painting esl>>4533892Gatekeeping is good anywaysGatekeeping is also known asQuality Control
>>4533923Its obviously not possible to compare photography (not art in itself) to painting (by definition, making art with paint). Paintbrushes are used to create things from thoughts. Cameras are machines that reproduce things that already existed. You can create art in front of a camera or create art from a camera’s output but using a camera itself can never be art. A single photo of something that already existed, something a human being did not create, is not art, not unless you create art using it as base materials. “Being a photographer” is not “being am artist” and never will be. Art requires creation. A single garry winogrand photo is not art. A sooc jpeg or as developed slide no matter how technically good is not art. A garry winogrand photobook or exposition is art. Ansel adams painting in the desired lighting in the darkroom is art.
>>4533932No shit bro. Photography is the entire process from inception to print. It is either extremely stupid or very dishonest to not recognize this.
>>4533855no they aren't. Putting up drywall isn't art
todd hido enjoyers, share your picsP.S. Please close your blinds at night. I already feel weird enough photographing your home in the middle of the night.
>>4533117that's such a valid critique, I'm definitely going for more of a soft, warm cozy feeling but I think you're right in that not being compelling on its own
my gf said this one was provocative and voyeuristic but I think its just a picture of a porch
>>4533820>my gf said this one was provocative and voyeuristic but I think its just a picture of a porchKek, it is just a pic of a porch but I like it. It's a cool pic. Crop it slightly so the porch is centered.
>>4524705Cool
Dusk encounter edition
Male kingfisher at 50m, early this morning. Lucky shot through a small opening in a tree.The R7 was really struggling hard but pulled it off.
>>4533862It was a couple. Female here.
Caught the male hovering 100m away
>>4533862Lovely Kingfisher spots. Still yet to see one.
>>4533868Yeah it's a really nice place. They're very territorial and have their favorite spots, so they're actually quite predictable. Once you spot a kingfisher on a branch, you just have to look around a bit more to get an idea of where you might catch him again.
Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos.https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?
>>4533480>being ironicAt what age were you diagnosed anon
>>4533467>forcing your hobby all the time on friends and family
>>4533577>forcingNigga I emplore you to develop natural relationships with other human beings that involves having a respect and cursory interest in each other's lives. You are not required to be a sperging faggot about a hobby in order to expect a basic level of input and appreciation from the people who care about you. I don't give the slightest fuck about cross-stitching personally, and I still engage with my friend who does it because that's what decent friends do.
what's the appeal of Instagram? It's about presenting photos yet the photo quality is very bad and the website UI sucks ass
>>4533851Social aspects. I would say it heavily depends on what type of photography you engage with, more artistic ones are fine (or better) without it, but when I was doing cosplay/conventions photos, almost everyone expected IG account and once I made one, it resulted in large increase of people actually watching them, sharing and visiting my site, where I upload full galleries. But if you take IG social part out, it's absolutely awful place for photography - no real control over proportions (in carousels it even take proportion of first photo in group, cutting the rest - something I learned only after some time, to my eternal embarrassment), rescaling, little to no control after upload and so on. I treat it as communication front and it works quite good that way.Unfortunately, there is nothing else on horizon that would take over its place. Yes, I know about Flickr, there are emerging projects like cos.place but as long as "normal people" cling to IG, its here to stay.
How to avoid diffraction with my camera?
>>4532939>>4532880nigga you don't even know what diffraction is and I can't bother to explain to someone who won't do 1 google search to acquire the minimal context necessary to understand the answer to the question they're askingjust shoot below f11 and there will be no noticeable diffraction for all intents and purposes someone asking this question could have
>>4532942It's clearly a troll thread, he's talking about flare which looks like it was added in post with how uncontrolled it seems.
>>4532948what is a flare? anyway the computer has no way of telling what is and what isn't a light source
>>4533042correct, that’s why all pixels in a photo or video are the same brightness
>>4532948It's just a streak effect filter. Basically a clear filter with parallel lines on it.
It is time.
>>4533096>>4533097>>4533101>>4533104Should have said, these were some holiday pics I took on my Xiaomi Redmi note ten pro.
I guess ill get a couple in bfore the image limit
Samsung S23 btw
Any Nokia or 2G cellphone camera photo lover here?
>>4519716fooji
>>4517579
Got this from an old Nokia 220, a Microsoft era phone and very clumsy. Was a great hassle to get the few pictures out of there. Anyway this is a photo from a farmer protest some years ago.
>>4533730Also, the phone in question with its banger animated background.
>>4519716What the fuck are you talking about?This whole thread is putrid shit
