[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography


Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: crop35.jpg (2.51 MB, 2289x2951)
2.51 MB
2.51 MB JPG
radom people in public street photos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelNX500
Camera Software1.12
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2017:10:16 15:35:51
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length45.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2289
Image Height2951
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
78 replies and 52 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: SAM_4444.jpg (897 KB, 1200x895)
897 KB
897 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelNX500
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:10:20 21:55:51
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length45.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
>>
looks like a gun in his pocket
>>
File: SAM_1856.jpg (1.18 MB, 1118x1200)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelNX500
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:10:20 21:55:46
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length45.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3174077
Snap into a Mango Stick!!
>>
>>3174081
ew is that period blood? fuck. you guys are so weird. i never even seen this type of things in my cultured and mannered thirdworld country.

File: wpt.png (2.32 MB, 1920x1080)
2.32 MB
2.32 MB PNG
One of my first photo's. What does /p/ think?
>>
File: SAM_0894.jpg (899 KB, 1200x801)
899 KB
899 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelNX500
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:10:20 21:55:28
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating320
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length16.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3174101
Needs more heroin

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width700
Image Height394
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3174105
Pretty good, I dont think the blurring at the bottom really works tho.
>>
>>3174106
I dont see how that relates to op's picture but if it;s on of your first "Good" Pictures why of that?

File: 20171014-_G012378.jpg (654 KB, 1352x895)
654 KB
654 KB JPG
I forgot my tripfag, but here's some photos from a recent trip.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:10:16 11:23:57
Exposure Time1/750 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness6.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1352
Image Height895
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
9 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
These leave me totally indifferent
>>
These look like you've shot them with a 2013 phone camera
>>
>>3173531
Hmm, looks like my Automator resize function really fucked up the downsize. They're a lot softer than they should be.
>>
>>3173393
>>3173401
>>3173402
I dig these guys.

Also, hey! Remember when you and I were both posting on /p/ regularly and I decided to follow your lead and do a photoyear? As of yesterday, it's a photodecade.
>>
>>3173617
Oh my god we're old. :) Hey man, been a while!

>personal growth thread

Post the first photo you were ever proud of. Savor how bad it is now.

File: binos s.jpg (159 KB, 1000x667)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
53 replies and 37 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC08932b.jpg (566 KB, 1620x1080)
566 KB
566 KB JPG
>>3171949
This is where I am.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwarePolarr Photo Editor
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2017:09:20 17:52:15
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness9.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1620
Image Height1080
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3172302
I bet this is also a really dull snapshit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 14.0 (Windows)
PhotographerMartin Munoz
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:05:20 01:14:46
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3172500
why do you do this in other people's threads? fuck off already
>>
File: misty.jpg (321 KB, 1000x667)
321 KB
321 KB JPG
>>3172492
>This is where I am.
That's a really nice composition and mood. I went to view a flat there as it was by college (when the Fine Art dept. was on Myrtle St). Ended up Lark Lane way and now back in the "North End".

Funny thing with Liverpool that visitors and newcomers notice is that from a picturesque location like in the photo you can turn a corner and be in a hellhole. I think it was due to the blitz, large areas were flattened. They were replaced by prefabs afier the war, then by small estates in the 60's.

Where I am. Pic related

>>3172500
>I bet this is also a really dull snapshit
Not at all. It's colourful, has good composition and tells a story. My only real criticism would be we can't see Andrea (?). Half a step right and raising the camera a tad would give us a better view of the "experiment", all four faces and a bit more symmetry. Also: dat noise at 400 iso, is this a ruse or just Canon?

>>3172515
>why
kek

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
File: DSC08973.jpg (468 KB, 1080x719)
468 KB
468 KB JPG
>>3172583
From where your pictures are taken, I'd guessed you're living near the Brookhouse pub. Is that where this is? Just before Ullet Road?

Have a picture of Skem

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwarePolarr Photo Editor
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2017:10:05 12:25:24
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness7.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height719
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: 34499647_OVR.png (308 KB, 830x467)
308 KB
308 KB PNG
is this a good camera for a newbie?

im looking to shoot nature, then move on to models, maybe some videos for artsy music.
13 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: croco 2 raw.jpg (1.42 MB, 6000x4000)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
>>3173891

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3400
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern858
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:10:20 18:51:24
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3173891
>Am I doing this right?
too dark
>>
>>3173881
It's good to shoot RAW, but the pics will look bland if you don't actually post process them. Just fuck around with it or find some videos of people editing on youtube to get ideas. Also if you want quick edits and don't know what to do you can actually apply the same color profiles your camera has under Camera Calibration > Profiles.
>>
>>3170474
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqzD4ffHJF0

Skip to 8:30 and it has some suggestions for good cheap starter cameras and lenses. Pls no bully
>>
>taking pictures

File: Layer 2.jpg (187 KB, 999x667)
187 KB
187 KB JPG
Dumping some shat 2nite
4 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Background copy.jpg (284 KB, 1000x667)
284 KB
284 KB JPG
comfy/comfy
>>
>>3174053
>too much of a brainlet to make a proper abstract thread, had to drop in this snapshit
ur not making it anytime soon.
>>
I'm curious. All your abstract photos are made with snapshots like >>3174053?
>>
>>3174054
boohoo these are just my recent walkarounds go back to your gear threads
>>
>>3174056
nop none of them were made with snaps like that

File: IMG_7684.jpg (1.27 MB, 2434x2393)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB JPG
Here we go lads finally got myself a box of the new formula Polaroid

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 6
Camera Software10.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:09:23 15:56:56
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness1.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2434
Image Height2393
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
86 replies and 18 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Scan_20170928 (5).png (2.29 MB, 1044x1238)
2.29 MB
2.29 MB PNG
From what I can tell, impossible's formula doesn't play too well with outside lighting. Pictures that I have taken indoors or in reduced light settings with flash on seem to come out the best. alternatively it helps to shoot on a cloudy day or if your subject is in the shade, that being said the results still aren't great, but if you really want to shoot on this film do not do it on a sunny day.
>>
File: Scan_20170814 (11).png (3.38 MB, 1245x1491)
3.38 MB
3.38 MB PNG
>>3173350
Here's an example of in the shade.
>>
>>3172407
Eh, recklessly pursuing aesthetic was fun when we all had vaporwave blasting through our headphones but it's almost 2018 and we expect more from our ancient technologies.
>>
>>3160748
it's overexposed you turbo autist calm down
>>
makes me sad

How long have you been chasing the dragon(shooting photography)?

I try to shoot up a few times a day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
PhotographerDavid Gillanders
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width666
Image Height1022
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3173933
like 3 or 4 years. If it's a good day, a hike or a trip or something I may shoot up to a roll or so a day. Sometimes I'll just not shoot for a week or two, can't say I have a schedule...

File: 20171004-66710019.jpg (808 KB, 1500x995)
808 KB
808 KB JPG
Old Thread >>3165569

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:10:10 22:55:14
214 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169712
BEST
>>
>>3171583
Exactly, was it a guess?
>>
>>3170603
why so much grain at ISO 400??
>>
>>3169070
Best so far
>>
>>3173862
That's probably just coloring on the hawk's feathers, they tend to be mottled.

File: 1492953827837.png (10 KB, 531x339)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
>Got my first DSLR in 2013 and just now figured out that the reason for why my pictures look dull and washed out is because I've been running auto white balance all the time and never adjusted it either in camera or in post
What other beginner mistakes have you made or see other people doing all the time?
32 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3173791
>On auto white balance, it corrected the WB and made all the snow completely white, but on daylight balance it turned the scenes more blue.

That's because you're too retarded to understand spot metering.
>>
>>3173796
>white balance has something to do with metering

lolwut?
>>
>>3173796
I don't think you know what metering is
>>
File: 1505320537517.png (127 KB, 601x508)
127 KB
127 KB PNG
>>3173796
>>
>>3173796
are you talking about manually setting the white balance by pointing at a white card?

I am 2 months into film photography and i've decided to finally try this 400mm lens that came with my x700, I haven't used it at all and I assume I have to do some sort of adjustment to the stops, how on earth do I go about this? I have no idea, I also have a x3 tele converter, what effect would that have on my exposure, it looks extremely dark thru the viewfinder
8 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3173662
I notice you didn't actually point out where there's a mistake...?
>>
>>3173404
>>3173495
>>3173662

But he's correct. wtf?
>>
>>3173662
>has no argument
>spouting lies
fake news
>>
Better question:

What girl are you trying to spy on with a 400mm plus 3X TC?
>>
So what the board is saying is that if I have a question like this it would be quicker and more precise to just go take a few shots with a couple of different setups, compare my results, and draw my own conclusions? Basically, you're saying that between the trolls and the idiots, whoever IS right will be shouted down, so it's not even worth asking here? And I'm not even OP.

>Why is /p/ dying Anon?

File: 12963-eos550dkit-1.jpg (42 KB, 500x300)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
Is the EOS 550D a compelling/suggestible purchase at 215aud?

No lenses included.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3172762
Yes, it's very much a nice beginner camera.
I'd couple it with either a standard zoom like the kit-lens 18-55mm(the one in your pic) to start out with, or a pair of primes like 24, 50, 85mm maybe
>>
that sounds like a lot of money for such an old camera, but the X50Ds are really nice cameras to use, so you won't regret having one.
>>
>>3172875
Yeah but it's a much better price for such a quality camera compared to anything I've found online.

>>3172861
Thanks, I'll obviously keep looking for something newer/better but I'll probably get this tomorrow.

What are the risks of buying such a aged unit?
>>
>>3173162
There are mechanical parts. Like anything with moving parts, eventually bits wear out. It all depends on how well used the camera has been.
>>
Couple the 550D with the 24mm STM. Good all-round setup and light

File: IMG_0517.jpg (2.52 MB, 4032x3024)
2.52 MB
2.52 MB JPG
Saw a rabbit today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 7
Camera Software10.3.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationBottom, Right-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:06:19 20:43:04
Exposure Time1/4 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating640
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length3.99 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3171232
>>>>>>/an/
>>
>>3171232
this is not the best photo i have ever seen.


If you felt an emotional response to this comment please navigate to my website www.chosis.com or www.instagram.com/chosis7 to share how you feel.
All feedback is very valuable to me given that I have stage 3 bone cancer. I am really trying to live life in the photography "fast lane". Just because I have cancer doesn't mean you have to be nice in your comments, I want the complete human experience. Happy photo taking.
>>
>>3171232
Are you in Australia? Because the rabbit is upside downs. Also l bet your mommy said it was good.
>>
>>3171811
Based bone cancer poster

just dropped 300 dollarydoos on this from ebay.

is this good for landscapes or did i just fall for the
>sugar
memes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Width550
Image Height455
27 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3171434
Thanks anon! I took it at dead horse point state park, overlooking the canyonlands national park.
>>
>>3171535
Did you use a polarizer?
>>
mtf chart interprets soft edges and meh center sharpness
>>
>>3172334
Can't remember for this shot. I usually do for nature, but it was getting pretty dark (this was after sunset) so maybe I took it off.
>>
>>3173304
I was asking because I'm in love with those vivid colors and assumed you probably used one
I have yet to get a real camera and stop using my phone like a fag, I think a polarizer is one of the first things I'll get.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.