>Sony gets APSC sensor>Calls it super 35mm>Charges 1800 usd>People buy it anywayHow does sony get away with it?
>>4308996>Nobody in cinema cares about FFlmao[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2100Image Height2100
>>4308998>ISO 25600 on videoyou're talking out of your ass, unless that camera is recording in any kind of lossless or I-frame only lossy video, the DCT quantization during compression will eat away every detail possible and leave only raped macroblocks. ISO 1600 is already enough to start getting blocking with a camera recording in H.264 at a substantial 80Mbps. This is over twice the bitrate of a normal Blu-Ray, or about the same as an UHD BD
Can't you just buy a ZV-E10 and put a PC closed loop water cooler on it and achieve the same shit?
>>4309063All we did was put on one of those cooling fans and the overheating issue more or less went away. Except for in really hot weather.
>>4308998>stillsJust record everything and pull stills from the video, why would I waste my time trying to set up a single shot when I can take tens of thousands of photos continuously and pick out the best ones?
Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses). If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
lmao at the two pseuds patting each other on the back itt
>>4306062This.Sent from my iPhone
>>4312076Your photos aren’t published.
>>4312102>t. pseud that follows einstein quotes as dogma and purposefully leaves his desk a mess to attempt to appear like a busy intellectualdont forget to get a cat because a pseud said cats were for intellectuals and drive a tesla so everyone knows you’re into “tech” lol
iPhone photo from a few days ago[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.G781VSQSDHXD2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height2400Image OrientationUnknown
Going to start dumping film scans from my recent trip to Japan that started in February. I've developed most my film, but I still have a handful of b&w rolls to develop. I'll post that stuff if this thread is still up by then.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.N981U1UES6HXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1593Image Height1079
>>4311416Thanks for all the tips, actually really good info
>>4311413Cinestill 800 35mmI think the smoothness is a combo of my scanning setup and that I just screenshotted the jpegs with my phone to post. I can see the grains when zooming in on the original files, but it does feel less pronounced than typical lab scans. Other gear info: Nikon FE2 with the 28mm 2.8 and 50mm 1.8 pancake. Most of the film I shot was kodak gold, lomo purple, and kentmere 100. I also shot two rolls of provia, and that was my introduction to slide film.
>>4311284really fucked this one up. could have been good but u stuffed focus
>>4311551I really need a diopter for my slr. When there aren't straight lines for me to use the split prism, I struggle to nail focus.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.N981U1UES6HXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1079Image Height1583
>>4311233oh...
post ur train/station/tracks pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 13:51:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4292201I really like that
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D750Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.4 (Windows)PhotographerDamien SmithMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern870Focal Length (35mm Equiv)160 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2022:07:04 22:55:55Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeOtherLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length160.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4288113green cargo blaze it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)93 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution241 dpcmVertical Resolution241 dpcmImage Created2021:06:23 10:59:11Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length62.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height848RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)90 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution241 dpcmVertical Resolution241 dpcmImage Created2021:10:12 14:01:37Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width848Image Height1280RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution241 dpcmVertical Resolution241 dpcmImage Created2021:10:17 04:27:29Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height848RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
What kind of camera do I need if I want to do sharp city photography. Does a FF sensor body not cut it anymore ? Or do I just some ultrasharp lens?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4308876No amount of lens sharpness will help with atmospheric haze. Some filters may help but otherwise you can only kinda compensate with dehaze.
Actually that’s fine, I like the haze
>>4309062More than that, because irl when I sell images, no one wants a fucking print, they want a high res image file, and that shit has to be perfect. So if you’re going to fuck around with film to make pretty art prints that’s great but if you’re going to sell your images to architects and cities you’re wasting your time, because they are only interested in the file. For them you get at least a 45 megapixel body stick a tilt shift lens on it and then get very good in Photoshop because most of your work is going to be in the computer, producing a professional image. Never mind the camera, you can pick up a used Nik, Cannon or Sony that will do the capture just fine. what you’re going to need most is a proper display & calibration for color work, which is a few thousand.
The lens is more important in your case. Get a quality wide lens. Such as the RF15-35, RF 14-35 or any brand equivalent with any camera that's not too old and you're good to go
>>4308869i think id rather shoot ff + stitch photos than go through the hassle of 4x5you should try that first op
Pre-summer 2024 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4294741Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4311727based, but does it not do 4:3? should result in wider vertical perspective
>>4311737As far as I have been able to figure this thing out, it has 3 modes:>4:3 interlaced>16:9 interlaced>16:9 pseudo-progressiveInterlace in the current day and age is difficult to make look good. Not sure if VP9 even supports it. There is no 4:3 progressive mode which is a big shame. It's a MiniDV tape recorder from 2006 btw. Digital tape, but you can just plug the camera to a PC via USB (not firewire!) and it shows up as a video device which you can record. Rather convenient. Supports only 576 line PAL. There is an NTSC variant too.
The viewfinder is shockingly decent for its age.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size7.19 - 28.81 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 2.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:05:06 18:41:20Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/3.2Lens Aperturef/3.2Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.09 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2592Image Height1944RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeClose-Up (Macro Mode)Metering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeMacroSubject Distance0.410 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed128Image Number141-4144
>mfw new light arrived today
>>4311784>mfw anon's new light[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.24Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:09 12:37:22Color Space InformationsRGB
I absolutely fucked my Zeiss Nettar by oiling the mechanism. Now it’s sluggish. How to I unfuck this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width600Image Height600Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4311493Of course! Genius.
>>4311492Dunk the entire thing in 99% iso alcohol and re-oil using the correct oil.
>>4311492>I absolutely fucked my Zeiss Nettar by oiling the mechanism.How did you apply the oil? Did you just ejaculate oil into the mechanism or what?What made you want to oil it?>How to I unfuck this?Disassemble the whole thing very very carefully and clean the oil away. Reassemble using watch oil.
>>4311492The entire mechanism doesn't need to be oiled only parts of it. Apply some naptha or lighter fluid liberally in that area and try to work it.The correct thing to do is to disassemble and clean in lighter fluid and lubricate.>>4311849This is incorrect many of these leaf shutters actually used molybdenum to lubricate them, watch oil or oil in general is too viscous and will slow the shutter mechanism down.
>>4311854so just dump it in liqui molyFixed
>creamy>dreamy>soft >fallout>BOKEHMfw. What are some other photography memes that drive you crazy? I get that good bokeh is about the only thing that separates us from phone pics but come on either obsession already.
>>4311933Usually they are referring to things that don't matter like chromatic aberration, corner softness, and distortion. The fact of the matter is that with a few exceptions almost all lenses made since the 60s have been more than good enough for everything except extremely technical photography.But as a reviewer you can't say everything is good because then it it's not really a review. So they create artificial product separation where the differences are technically real, but actually meaningless with regard to the photo output. Same goes for autofocus.
>>4311831'game changer' makes me seethe every time. youtubers can't stop saying this dumb phrase when it clashes hideously with every other piece of their diction. it sounds like something an out of touch boomer thinks culturally relevant young scammers and grifters say. i one time heard it in real life and got whiplash
>>4311817faggot.
>>4311813see>>4311817"It" is singular"They" is pluralThere are two sexes (gender is made up)>>4311815American education on full displayPoor little zoomers cannot even understand basic grammmatic concepts
>>4312009>There are two sexes (gender is made up)Truth
What is you all's opinion of him going over old cameras?https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbBZM9aUMsjHKIbURZXP3E8i8Fl_xfc2d
>>4308169Go to small town thrift stores in the midwest and semi-rural areas. They still believe digishits are worth $5. Then start a youtube channel to drive up prices after you've accumulated at least 50 of them so you can sell them for $100 each.Boom, now you have a nikon Z8 and an S lense
>>4308160I bought one of the "top-end" mavica floppy disk camera after watching his video about the mavica. Thankfully i found in on thriftstore for around 30 bucks or so.It's one of the reason why I'm into "older" digital camera rn though I'm specifically more into mid to late 2000s camera phones like SE K800 or Nokia N95. My first camera phone is an iphone 3g so it's interesting to use what is pretty much superior camera that came years before
>>4308224I hate his new obsession with garbo quickstart PCs, buy more obsolete broadcast equipment!
>>4308160he uses these cameras in the same way that everyone on this board would
Why is a fucking YouTuber thread up
And all my photos are fucking garbage and I'm realizing my edits look like total shit I think because I subconsciously try to replicate the iphone HDR look. What the fuck do I do? How do I get better at shooting in imperfect settings?
>>4311532>local business group so pretty corporateThey will accept the shittiest of pictures, you're unironically completely safe. Shit could be out of focus and they would still be cool with it.
>>4311534Yeah you right. I'm more disappointed in myself than anything, lol.
>>4311537That's fine too, you'll improve from your fuckups. Just don't worry much about this one.
>>431151248 is reasonable. I got about 38 very good shots on my first shoot (100 mediocre, 800 shite), and 44 (130 mediocre, 950 shite) on my second. If it's going to be used on social media whoever you did the shots for isn't going to use every single one.
>>4311078shoot moreYou're being too harsh on yourself, nobody gives a shit about your pics they either want to see themselfs or see the subject they care about
what am i in for /p/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4311734Diversity, equity and inclusion.
>>4311777based Sony
>>4311777>lol sony callin matthew on his shitOPie youre in for walking around carrying a block of uncomfortable controls positioned stupidly and endlessly fucking around in the badly designed menu mess just to take the next goddamn picture until you get to tye pount where its just not worth it anymore, just like we all did eventually. Sony has yet to learn that engineers make poor designers.
>>4311734either nos or you were scammed real bad
>>4311903i needed one fast thats why
Post scanning rigs. Apparently the main caveat of buying a dedicated scanner is slow as shit workflow, having to edit the picture with shitty software BEFORE moving to the next frame, and feed it manually yet.Have you built a scanning rig? Did you order the kit online? What can you make a backlight of? How do you ensure the camera is completely perpendicular and the film is correctly aligned? Tell me ideas to feed the negatives without scratching them.I have a Nikon D3300 with the kit 18-55 zoom. I've read most use a 55mm macro prime. I only have the kit lens and some "macro" extension rings. Is that good enough?Pic not mine, but an interesting setup.
>>4311447nta but the frosting will eliminate the newton ringsas far as obscuring the negative, I don't know how bad it will beI have some armor etch and I'm gonna buy some glass to frost with it. With the etchant I can adjust how frosted the glass is and maybe I can strike the right balance between eliminating the newton rings and not blurring the negative. It would be so nice to be able to just squish the film between two sheets of glass rather than fiddling with these damn holders.
is it better to get a high mp camera (like 5DRS) or a camera that can pixel shift (like K-1) for scanning medium format only?
And would anyone be kind enough to upload somewhere a full resolution RAW of a 35mm negative so I could try and play around with it?
>>4311947>https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nef75FLt4HJ3EJXjVueeXzBDvHTn9cOt/view?usp=sharing
>>4303094Yeah its not bad at all actually. I didn’t like that it doesnt AF, bc gd it i don’t want to have to sit there eyeballing manual focus all day on each slide, but I’ve since looked at all my scans that came from a proper AF macro lens, and the focus is pretty inconsistent anyway. So if I have to manual focus every image to really guarantee I get a good one I might as well just use the laowa.In all my experimentation, I found the sweet spot to be shooting the 35 mm slide in portrait orientation in a set of three overlapping scans, stitched together in affinity over a single shot scan for alignment for a 10,000 x 8,000 pixel image. At that point the grains are fully rendered round and smoothly, so beyond that, more resolution isn’t gaining me anything of value.
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 2000DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:06 12:33:52Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4307951what was shutter speed?
>image limit on a photography boardsomeone new thread please
an eternal recent photo thread would be cool
>>4310868qt>>4310090High speed internets
continued from >>4293925i won't bother to ask for any sort of feedback this time. in fact, please refrain from responding at all. now i'm just posting for the sake of adding photos to the board. if you think they suck, then make a new thread and post better photos.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:12:13 21:35:12Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:25 01:22:21Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 23:41:52Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness6.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 00:35:08Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-2.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 02:50:20Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
Wow OP these all suck!
My mom cleared out her basement and gave me her old 110 camera she used back in the day. Anyone ever shot with this format? Looks like a roll is ~$10 and dev is $12 for 24 exposures. I don’t have high hopes since the negatives are so small, but it’s portable
>>4308045I mean...if you want to play with it just because, go ahead. But 110 and Kodak Disc were dog shit. They looked bad at 3x5.
i'd shoot lots of 110 if i could bulk roll hp5 and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffed
>>4311593Cut your own, and you can 3d print a reel
>>4311593>and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffedsounds like you just didn't look and wanted us to do the work for you, faggot, there's plenty of results for 110 reels on ebay from reputable brands and offbrand chinese>b-but skuffedwhat does that even mean?
>>4308389Looks like something Zach will take 10 years from now