>open Lightroom>import picture>check lens corrections and remove chromatic aberration>auto adjustment>apply grading preset>denoise with AI (optional)>export imageWhy would you ever need more?
>>4347861>>4347863you two homos know, you can configure what auto does in C1, do you?
>>4347856Interesting, that might be why my prints look disappointing. How do you generally calibrate for printing? Do you send them to a print shop or homemade?
>>4347859>faggot doesn't change his own oil>faggot let's the lab do all the colour gradingwhat a faggot
im about ready to jump from C1 to LR again simply because I hate C1's bullshit and its getting to me.>fucks up import file handling>fucks up export file handling>fucks up cropping and navigating>fucks up updates which touch none of the existing problemssomeone teach these guys how to deploy incremental updates instead of requiring you log into a site and download/install an entirely new packagewas with LR from 2009-2019 before trying C1 and getting it free with my new SNOY (now paid pro), but i'm starting to look back realised there was so much less hassle with LR. as much as i hate adobe and their subscription fuckery, it just worked better..
>>4348431Werks on my machine (I never update)
mavica cave textures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelFDMAVICAMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2001:01:01 02:42:09Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating283Exposure Bias2 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length4.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1472Image Height1104
>>4346949I have one of these. They have an issue where they get hot pixels or dead pixels and apparently a very minor NR in Lightroom makes it go away. You will need a CF card 1gb or under. It has full PASM, hold on I have a picture taken with one, not this one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTDCamera ModelC730UZCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:08:15 14:35:28Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
This is an E990 which is the same thing but with a 3.34mp sensorBonneville 2023[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE990Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:08:09 09:13:36Exposure Time1/350 secF-Numberf/8.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length16.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio Z10Camera SoftwareOptio Z10 Ver 1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height2448Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:16 00:41:42Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width3264Subject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Bias0 EVColor Space InformationsRGBImage Height2448White BalanceAutoRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/50 secFlashFlashF-Numberf/3.5ISO Speed Rating800Image Width3264SaturationNormalContrastNormalSharpnessNormalFocal Length6.30 mmMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeLandscapeLight SourceUnknown
>>4348496That's a good picture
Fujifilm FinePix JX500.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix JX500Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:08:07 19:15:24Exposure Time1/90 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness7.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length4.65 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3145Image Height2096RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Hieveryone,Post the photos you've taken on your rides. I've taken up cycling recently, here are mine. Could someone please give me some feedback? Have a nice time[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3200Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:08:16 02:04:59Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/10.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy A55 5GCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2Focal Length (35mm Equiv)13 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:08:16 02:04:40Exposure Time1/35 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/2.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length1.74 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy A55 5GCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:08:16 02:04:54Exposure Time1/35 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.54 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4348576This one's nice, nice reflections from the canal or river that's under the bridge
>>4348581This one's massively oversharpened, ease off (way off!) on the unsharp mask
These are good photos in terms of composition but technically poor, too much grain, too many sharpening artifacts.You have talent for spotting subjects tho, nice pictures when viewed at low size, just ugly when viewed at 100%
Which settings I should use to get everythingin focus at night? My camera is Sony Nex 3. Thanks.
>>4347431I hope that photo is somehow edited, because if not that's messed up
I taught myself to survive a four story fallWearing a space suit and a dead Englishman's socksIt's a textbook procedure, kidRight out of the pages of the hollowed out bookWhere once I hid my paint speckled glassesDon't lose your shoes over such a simple step as hitting groundJust remember to roll
>>4347431Vafan håller ni på med
>>4347902I was gonna congratulate you on the poetry but google says it's lyricsStill good
Brand New fucking suck
Just wanted to share my travel through Lugano, so I am dumping all pics here.Pics have only been scaled for /p/ and are unedited.With some subjects I was unsure, if color or black&white was better, so I am posting both.I just recently started using black&white since that seems the go to on dull days. Here it was sunny, but for some reason I felt like black&white fit more during the midday.Also, please tell me if I'm a good/talented photographer!If there are pics with potential please tell me what I should've done better (settings, positioning of myself, placement of objects in frame etc.)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1PhotographerAdrian J.Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.3Lens Name28mm F1.4 DG HSM | Art 019Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomImage Created2024:08:09 22:42:43Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationUnknownContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceManual TemperatureExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix33Color Temperature6000 K
Tried HDR and some basic editing. Dont like the haloing not sure how to remove it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1PhotographerAdrian J.Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:16 00:04:29Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1999Image Height3000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1PhotographerAdrian J.Lens Size70.00 - 200.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.3Lens NameTAMRON SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 A025Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:15 23:47:39Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1999Image Height1333RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationUnknownContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceManual TemperatureExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix33Color Temperature5900 K
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1PhotographerAdrian J.Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.3Lens Name28mm F1.4 DG HSM | Art 019Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:15 23:48:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1999Image Height3000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceManual TemperatureExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix34Color Temperature5900 K
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1PhotographerAdrian J.Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.3Lens Name28mm F1.4 DG HSM | Art 019Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:15 23:49:31Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias-1/3 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1999Image Height1333RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationUnknownContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceManual TemperatureExposure Compensation2Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix33Color Temperature5900 K
>>4348554These are cool, they almost don't look real, the repeating fade on the skyline is too perfect
Is the Tokina 11-16 still the best lens for DX? I got an IR-converted D300 and want to go w i d e Gear containment thread I guess.
>>4348588>fuji>well executedYou know back in my day trolling outside of /b/ was a bannable offence.
>>4348558If you can deal with the size, weight and slower aperture the 12-40 is a beautiful lens. It actually pairs well with a fast little prime like the Panny 15 or Oly 17 so I'd get it anyway. If you get a Vietnam made 17mm (just look at a shot of the back element if you're buying used) they tend to be much more consistent. That said the Panny is better from what I've read.
>>4346978test
>>4348658Yeah, I've seen stories the Vietnam ones are better, or at least have better quality control/less duds, but if even a perfect 17 is interior to an average Pana 15 then it seems like the 15 is the right choice anyway (plus it's not the end of the world going from 35 to 30 as much as I like the former). Seems like it'll just be a matter of getting one before the other or vice versa regarding the 12-40 or a shorty prime, then. I guess there's also the 12-45 since I'm not sure how the 12-40 will handle on an EM5 even with a grip, but the size/weight difference doesn't seem worth the f/4 floor.
top keks[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSonyCamera ModelG8441Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.38Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:07 00:45:35Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/2.0ISO Speed Rating160Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Is there a nice camera for normies around 200-250€ that's better than the latest iPhone?
>>4348634No. I will not.
>>4343333They don't make cameras for $250. Even stuff like Canon SX740 HS is $500 and has like 5 months wait time (maybe).
>>4343329No. Normies don't benefit from real cameras anyway, except if they need to zoom in.
>>4343329>normiesNormies, by definition, do not care about learning how to take photos, therefore dedicated cameras are totally wasted on them.
>>4348669>Normies don't use actual cameras>Therefore the only people using real cameras are autisticWoah, Winograd was a retard confirmed
Am I the only one that hates this smarmy trust fund faggot?
>>4348589Eww. I wouldn't touch that thing if it was to save my own life.
>>4348272Self-deprecating humor is just so outplayed. It teeters on being the complete opposite to the point of self-indulgence. If you have to make THAT many jokes about how much you "suck" I can almost say with certainty you think you're God's gift to earth. Inauthentic and boring. At least he has a creative vision he can justify--not that I think it's all that interesting. Myopia is still a kind of vision. Next.
>>4348272>i purposefully watched a video by some retard i dont like and now im madwhy are redditors like this?
>>4348272I think he leans into the nihilistic-turd schtick a little too hard, but otherwise he's okay.
>>4348651>I think he leans into the nihilistic-turd schtick a little too hard, but otherwise he's okay.I agree - he seems to have a better sense for where to draw the line in his later videos than his earlier ones, but overall I think his channel isn't bad and most of the time his photographs are pretty decent.
I fumbled my images and now I don't know which photo was taken with which sensor. Which ones of these are taken with my CCD and which ones are taken with my CMOS?
>>4347780Toneh is literally paid by sony.
>>4348326>hurr durr, doesn't countit was a blind test
>>4345037>Nikon D700Based. Do those new retro lookin' full frame Nikons have a similar sensor? I might have to pick one up.
>>4348656Not at all.
>>4348656The recent cameras and their Z-mount glass are superior. But there D700 is impressive value for money. The retro-styled ZF lacks buttons for a fast workflow, but is otherwise great.
Guys, I'm a newbie. (Matter of fact I don't even have a camera yet) 1. Where can I get a look at photo sessions from renowned photographers? Preferrably downloadableLike that series with James Deani'm more interested in Saul Leiter works, he at least he has photobooks, but what to do with others? Where to look for good sets? Or just google interesting star and by association it have to have top photo author? 2. Also do you think Fuji xt-1/xt-2 nice as a first camera? Maybe there is a better option you think? I would mostly shoot street and def will try out pfp with cute/intresting looking gals (or maybe even guys who knows) and probably nature as well. why not3. I wanted to ask one more thing, but forgot what exactly[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS MacintoshPhotographer© Dennis Stock/Magnum PhotosImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2005:04:11 14:00:11Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width6890Image Height4809
>>4348428They're just typing words
>>4348397Yeah if you walk around shooting walls and flowers like the rest of /p/You dont even need digital either
>>4345224>>4345220i think he meant magnumphotos.com
Get a Leica X series camera. X1, X2, X Vario.Everything you need to take good photos, nothing you don’t.~35mm equivalent fixed lenses, or 28-70mm equivalent on the vario. 35mm is probably what you’d want to use for Magnumish type of photography anyway. The vario has a slow lens, but again, if you’re doing that kind of photography a fast lens isn’t that important. Even at night, get creative with light.Vs. the Fujifilm cameras you’re getting a very, very good lens that’ll max out the capabilities of a 16mp sensor. The build quality and design is also a step above. (Fujifilm are good in all of these regards, but Leica is better).They’re also relatively affordable.Instead of getting an interchangeable lens camera where you’re just gonna keep buying lenses to try to make yourself better, just get a camera capable of doing some of the best anyway and forces you to get better, then grows with you.
>>4345219Thanks for awaring me on Dennis Stock OP I love this photo
What would be the cheapest and easiest way to go about developing a shit ton of 35mm film rolls and disposable cameras from the 90s and 2000s? Also, some of them have are bound to have a few nudes and sex pics from my wife and I from back then, would the place that develops the film object to that?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.17134.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:11:09 22:35:31
>>4348572I would think that as long as nothing in the pics would present to the viewer as criminal, you'd probably be fine. Back in the days when photo labs were in every town, they would have seen all sorts of things that I'm sure they'd have rather not seen.Just mail it to a mail-service developing lab, if you'd rather have it done at arms-length.
>>4348572As long as you’re not doing anything illegal, generally labs will have no isssue processing things for you. There is of course always a chance that they keep copies of any “good stuff”, this was always a huge rumor back when film and 1hr labs were common. Worst you can do is reach out to labs and just ask, hey, got all these old films from ages ago, there might be nudes and stuff, that cool? That sort of thing. Also>that cut of bikiniFuckin hell lad how old are ya
>>4348572>a beach that isn't filled with land whales, nary a tattoo to be seenMan, I miss the 1990's
>>4348591Late 40s
>>4348573>What's your wife look like?she's white, and my cock is black.
Hello anons. I like to walk around and take pictures of the city, even though all I have is a shitty phone camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareACDSee Pro 10Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:27 13:51:57Image Width1125Image Height1500
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RPCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:08:03 21:42:53Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4345001Could tell this was from an EOS R* miles away. Nice.But slightly too aggressive with aperture. The buildings and cool lightning in the background, which take up over 60% of the photo, need more attention.
>>4345069True!! I almost always shoot at f/8 and this was me just trying to switch it up hahah. Appreciate the notes m8
>>4345069What gave away the camera type? The colors and dynamic range?
test
Recently learned that apparently there is a trend of """street photographers""" making videos where they approach strangers and ask them if they can take their photo.I think they way it's done is kinda cringe, since at least of the handful of examples I've seen some look super staged and I can't help but think that they're taking the photos not for the photos' sake, but for the video of how they take them. Especially since they almost always seem to approach cute girls.Though I still want to maybe try this myself to build my portfolio and get some practice in (I'm so tired of dragging out the same handful of people for shoots) and just get out of my comfort zone a little both in terms of photography and talking to people. Especially since my country is kinda fucky about street photography and I think you technically would have to ask the subjects for permission, which ruins the whole point of street photography. So I guess street portraiture is the closest I can get without worrying that some boomer will harass me about my camera.What are your opinions, has anyone here ever done it?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution25 dpiVertical Resolution25 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height664
>>4348401>>4348553>>4348569Why would they be staged? I remember back around 2014 in Tokyo I had a hipster looking guy and a separate punk looking chick ask to take my portrait on a couple of occasions over a month. But in Europe I've never been approached. Maybe if you're a fat neck beard you'll be getting 98% rejections I'm an average looking young dude and that was before I had an interest in photography. I imagine in a big city you'll have a 40-50% rejection rate, more anywhere people are busy. Probably want to focus on tourist or university areas Anyway you're all autists and I'll try my luck at street portraits on the weekend and post back results
>>4348621>why would social media just heckin be fakerino?????
>>4348622I think it's easy to sense a fake vibe in a video, hot chick and some scripted obviously acted conversations In reality people will be nervous and kinda suspicious, more autism in conversation. Eg look at that Trevor wisecup guy
>>4348626>comparing a guy who nearly gets beat up for sticking a camera in your face to fake instagram street "portraiture" videosretard
>>4348636He's might be getting beaten up by feral niggers but his photography isn't scripted tiktok trash
I just think they're neat
>>4346454tl;dr nophoto gearfag troll
>>4346563You’ve been warned about bronyschizo. Now that he’s found /p/ he’ll be making threads to point out his own pony references every single day until mods exhaust his proxies.
>>4342497>file deletedThat's it, Lee (((Goldson))) has won. Barneyfags can no longer post a picture of an alligator as the OP of a reptile thread.
>>4348603The spammer mentioned that it was specifically a screencap from an episode of MLP.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.1 (iOS)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:08:15 23:33:38Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness6.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Thoughts on the f100? I've been tempted lately because of the Nikon 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D. It seems like it could be my perfect single lens setup and after shooting with a fully manual film camera for awhile, I really want to go back to something that shoots more like a modern camera but I didn't want the bulk of the f5
>>4348155I like how you got hung up on the word leica and completely ignored the rest of my sentence.Gearfag.
>>4347980>as an F5 owner I can tell you that lugging that goddamn boat anchor around sucksas a D5 + 200-400VR handholder I can tell you that lugging that goddamn boat anchor around will make you >>>/fit/
>>4340427>The F100 likely has a CFn for that.It doesn't, it also was a service-only change in firmware. I wish it did have that as an option, but then it's like the smallest inconvenience there could be.As a counterpoint, if you shoot a lot of rolls of the same stock, with the leader pulled in you won't accidentally shoot the same roll twice.
>>4348534That's cute.
>>4348601The RB67 with lens is over a kilogram lighter than the DSLR combo, not to mention easier to use as it's more compact than a huge telescoping telephoto.