mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
This thread would make Ken Rockwell really proud.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T3 Ver4.50Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:07 13:46:43Exposure Time1/1400 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness8.4 EVExposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessHardWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationHighFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307339[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307330Meme subject but the contrast is really good. I like it
Anyone used a Nikon F55? It was one of their last film SLR’s. I’m used to using an old D80 DSLR and want to start shooting on film. The F55 looks similar enough to the D80 that it shouldn’t be too hard to get used to[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width500Image Height332Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4305665Anon, with how cheap film SLRs are and how little difference there is between models, you should settle for nothing less than a F80 and if you can and don't mind the extra bulk, get an F100. Don't pinch pennies on sub-$100 items that shape your experience the whole time you're shooting.
>>4306795>FM3A>feature-richkekIt's basically a 70s camera made in the 2000s, the point of that model isn't being feature-rich and it likely has less features than the F55 OP asked about. Better built, that much is true.
>>4305665younger film cameras with lots of computerized parts tend to break often and are harder to repair. if your gonna get a film camera get one from from the 70s-90s
>>4306801Hijacking this to ask if there's any point in shelling out $600-$900 for a FM3A instead of an older FM/FM2 or even something like an F2. I'm looking for a manual, mechanical f-mount and don't really care if it's AI or not as long as it's reliable.
>>4307336Your post made me curious so I checked my local listings, and holy Jesus, why are these still this expensive? I don’t such a price is justifiable for a film slr no matter how nice or top of the line it may have been, that’s mad.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1720
Old thread reached limit. >>4269325Post birds.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D60Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern862Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 18:27:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3442Image Height1646RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4307313I guess I would go for the sigma, neither are really bad choices though, just be prepared for a workout. Ideally you'd get something that can be adapted or will work well on whatever you decide to upgrade to.
>>4307313The Nikon 200-500 pairs great with the D500. Good middle ground for speed reach and weight/size and not too expensive either.
>>4307287right now a Tamron 200-400 f5.6 Push pull lens. Once in a while a 500mm mirror lens, and on rare occasions a Sigma 70-300 f4-5.6.
>>4307313nice pics, love the swirly bokeh
>>4307322>>4307321I did have a chance to get a d7200 and the 500mm nikkor for 1500... but my plan was to just forgo upgrading to another dslr, and head straight into mirrorless in a few years, my d60 has lots of life left in it, plus I figured if it would he good to learn on.
Am I a talented photographer today?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwarePhotomator 3.3.7Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.9Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)34 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:18 16:55:03Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwarePhotomator 3.3.7Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:18 17:00:59Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length20.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwarePhotomator 3.3.7Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:18 17:19:57Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwarePhotomator 3.3.7Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:18 17:21:49Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjEy3pYA7Yk[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwarePhotomator 3.3.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:25 02:39:56Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating25600Exposure Bias5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Cheap digicam photography? Only started taking pics very recently on my parents' old Sony cam and I feel like I mog 90% of the posters here[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-S2000Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:03:15 20:03:46Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4304085>photographers that travel but not JUST to take picturesThese people are basically extinctTaking photos walking your fuckin dog results in more honest work than a pointless “photowalk”. These people did not “do photography”. They were wide eyed journalists immersed with wonder rather than interns afraid of running afoul of state censors and old boomers doing it for the paycheck.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:15 15:02:16Exposure Time451/250000 secF-Numberf/2.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/2.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance12.46 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2052Image Height1524
>>4298229>i feel like i mog 90% of users herethat's because 90% of users here take photos of nothing
>>4298240some photographer have to much of an ego and don't like other photagraphers work at all.
>>4298229Christ is risen!
post photos you've taken on expired filmpicrel is 1000iso 3m colorslide that expired in 1984[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3119Image Height2075
>>4306736[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:07:06 16:53:17Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4295767I didn't take these but were on 2 rolls out of the lot I got off eBay as unused... likely shot in 2004 for a political publication and now I double exposed it and developed 20 years later. Interesting times. Guess the guy got too stoned to develop them and forgot lol.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307078[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307081[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4306601are you the one who posted the blue building in the train thread
Is there a service I can send my Canon F1 to have internally cleaned? None of the shops in my area will service the F1 and its been shutter dragging a few times.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4305647check out kurts camera repair in SD. they go way back and were/are an authorized service center for nikon, canon, and minolta. expect to wait at least a month to get it back, though
>>4305661motherfucker already got a leica tier german pistol so why not match it with an appropriate camera
>>4307227Idk its a fine camera, this is the only problem I've had with it yet
>>4307302for realsies though, send it off to a specialist or find some bum on craigslist who claims they repair camerasits not like either of the options give you any warranty
Just buy an AE-1 instead.
Please share your images taken with long focal lengths.>i bought pic related last week300mm FF equivalent or longer only.NO test shots of street furniture thankyou, only images you left the house to shoot.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.22Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height2048
>>4306461[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T4 Ver1.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:04:08 06:36:57Exposure Time1/3500 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness10.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306462[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T4 Ver1.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)192 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:04:21 11:44:03Exposure Time1/2700 secF-Numberf/6.4Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/6.5Brightness9.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length128.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306463[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T4 Ver1.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:04:08 06:36:59Exposure Time1/210 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.7Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4297673Brilliant
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)410 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:17 00:17:42White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length205.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1800Image Height1349RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeManualAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
I never want to hear a single person on this board ever say film has the same dynamic range as digital ever again.Look what happened to my photo...
>>4307198You don't want a camera with race based exposure settings?
>>4307181Go do your fucking homework before complaining about a medium that works perfectly for everyone else who did theirs.
>>4307181What stage of grief is this?
>>4307181>On my op picture which 2 points are you going to averageThat would be a creative decision but 99% of the time I just turn my camera to "Aperture priority" and it just werks lol.On manual cameras I would take a light meter reading off the nearest green grass and just use that.
>>4307245not one for the blacks, no
Now that JEWKON bought red.I can already see what is going to happen to Red.Do you want to hook an external HDR OLED 8k monitor? Only the flagship model has this, the most basic is limited to 1080p.Do you want to use two SSDs instead of a single one?Only the flagship model can do it, the most basic is limited to a single ssd.It is over for red.
>>4300343I know the former owner, he has a place in Whistler. We had a few discussions about gear and I bragged about owning a Zeiss 105 f4.3 UV Sonnar.He said it was a great lens, then he showed me some of his. Sets of Zeiss Superspeeds, a gorgeous APO Lanthar, a 34mm f5.6 meant for 8x10 view cameras.The real highlight was his 1200 mm F 5.6 Canon. It's really hard to describe what it feels like to hold a lens is worth more than a down payment on a lot of good houses.He set it up in his balcony on this massive tripod that's worth I think more than any lenses that I currently are with the exception of the one I mentioned earlier. I took a few photographs with it then scanned around the village and happened upon couple fooling around about 3/4 of a mile away in their hot tub.
>>4306246Did you know that a 34mm lens used for 8x10 film would be the equivalent of using a 5mm lens on 35mm film? Bonkers.
>>4306293I thought itwas an aerial photography lens
>>4306386Maybe it was a 34 inch lens? That would be a 120mm equivalent on 8x10.
>>4306293It had a 10 inch front element
Besides /p/ is there any good forums where people actually post pictures they take and give feedback instead of shitpost? Is there any that aren’t ban-heavy for anything slightly right of Mao? >pic related>me taking a photo of Mt Rainier[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 15 ProCamera Software17.4.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)77 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 20:06:38Exposure Time1/99 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness5.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2250Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306860Flickr might be dead, but it's either that or getting followers on fb/insta/tiktok and so on, that either don't care about you, or criticize what you put out or like but don't get involved.Also, flickr is at its core a site for photographers. You can also find niche forums for brands and so on, but you might get nitpickers and nerds that will run you over if you are or are not the flavor of the month.Mastodon might be an alternative, but it's also pretty dead and it's just a facebook alternative.
>>4306861>MastodonAnyone here using pixelfed? The federated alternative to Instagram?
>>4306636Superior decade old Canon DSLRs with Magic Lantern support multiple histograms including RAW. Firmware issue
>>4306877You go where the audience is, the fediverse is pointless wank unless the big players fuck up for good
>>4307205They also have micro four thirds tier noiseJust use a sony. The highlight warning set to max is very close to raws clipping
Is the Peak Design Travel Tripod really the best lightweight compact tripod that still gets the job done? >pic related[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1179Image Height2556Scene Capture TypeStandard
Anybody here use one of these chink arca cube knockoffs? I’m thinking of getting one but even 300 still seems a bit steep.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1500Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4307139
>>4307194Yes that was in fact the reaction the autismo turbo sped in this thread made me have, I see you understand as well
>>4307167leofoto is a decent chink brand, i wouldn't hesitate
>>4307167that isnt an arca cube knock off. the cubes as their name implies are cubes. that is one of arca's lesser geared heads
You can't tell me one real pro of crop sensors. There's absolutely no point of APS-C when full frame exists. It's not as small, compact or economical as micro four thirds nor do you get the resolution and capability of FF. I guess it's just so that people can feel like they're larping as FF. FF is isn't even that much more expensive most of the time so being a poorfag is the only excuse[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2022:01:10 21:03:15Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height683
>>4306181canon EOS rebel sl3
>>4305779One huge pro is that I already own a camera with a crop sensor. Also none of the clients I've taken for photography-related side gigs have ever complained about muh pixels on my photos. You can chase muh sharpness and muh resolution forever and buy every new generation of camera body, the quality of your photography isn't going to change and if you aren't frequently working jobs that demand those stats you're blowing that extra money for nothing.>inb4 poorfagThis insult only wounds other gearfaggots, which is ironic since it's usually aimed at people outside of the gearfag circlejerk. Outing yourself as being clinically retarded with your hobby spending isn't the "gotcha" you think it is
>>4307117better cameras are better+you have no idea how rich we are here>gamestop>shitcoins
>>4307034>it is literally the same as aps-c mode>literally no. there are technical differences. even if it appears close to you. >>4307034>so why not just buy a teleconverter people don't do this. There are technical factors why crop is better. lenses and sensor speed are big reasons. super 35 is still used in movie productions and that's barely bigger than APSC. The alexxa lf is a super 35 camera that costs 40k.
>>4307247People do buy TCs. Most accomplished wildlife photographers do ff+TCs instead of carrying a noisier, softer body built to lower standards all the time.Only pentax and old, old nikon ever built aps-c to pro standards. Every other crop sensor camera sucks more, except the om-1/e-m1.
TWENTY-FOUR - FIFTY - ONE HUNDRED AND THIRY-FIVE is the way to go AND YOU KNOW IT!
Why does no one here like UW? It's my favorite focal range when I can make it work.
>>430243318mm pancake with fixed f8 is all you need
>>4304476OP agrees.
>>4302645dangerously based
>>4302433>was first using 35 85 135>got a 21>sold the 35>nowtheresabiggap.arw>got a 55>stopped using 21 and 85 altogether>stuck with using only 55 and 135 to this daysometimes i wish a had a super wide like 21 or 18 just to see what else kind of compositions i can come up with for my scene but other than that, i can do literally ANYTHING with just 55 and 135
Got a good bonus at work and decided to finally retire my Canon 6D. Will be going Sony after seeing what the mirrorless landscape looks like with CaNikon.Canon, makes decent bodies and fantastic lenses, that R8 is probably the best entry level FF camera you can get. Still gatekeeping RF mount and will no doubt cripple R bodies to protect the cinema line. Lenses are probably the best but almost double the price of Snoys in my meme country.Nikon, feels the best to me in hand and I really like the RAWs the most. Menus and AF settings make the most sense but no real Z mount 16-35 f2.8 equivalent and the pro-grade 50mm being the size of a 24-70 is a big loss since those are my two most lenses.Sony, looks like the logical choice. Bodies have everything you could need crammed into them, native lenses are a good balance between perfect optical quality and being corrected by software means I don't carry around any too big or heavy. I like being able to buy an A7S/FX3 in the future if I wanted to get serious with vid. Colors/skin tones don't seem to be oversharpened/saturated like before. Ergonomics aren't the best and you do get the stigma of being another zoomer buying a Sony to shoot zoomer things but hey, it is what it is.Pic related, hopefully me with my Snoy A7IV.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:09:08 16:17:54Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-2.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length16.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4306449You could look at finding a decent used A1, would be cheaper than A7IV + FX3 together. Would be better for stills and video than A7IV, especially with the new fw update, though FX3 being a dedicated video camera btfos it in usability on that front, even if downsampled video from the A1 sensor would technically be sharper.
I use mine for video all the time but I must have taken a total of 10 pictures on it. It's a tool I need for work. But if I ever go out I grab my xt5.One thing I'll say is whatever waterproofing problems they used to have those things are sealed tight now. I shot a mermaid themed opera (don't ask) and had the thing splashed like 10 dozen times. Works fine half a year later. My old Nikon used to go out for repair at least once a year.
>>4306443For what it’s worth, the 14-30 f/4 and 14-24 f/2.8 Z lenses are both incredible. And you can use the Sony 50 1.2 GM on a Nikon body seamlessly with a Megadap ETZ21 adapter, that’s what I do. Agree with you about the size of the Nikkor being a bummer. I really like the Sony 50. So you could have the best of both worlds.
>>4307214And you won’t need to buy a video-centric body if you get a Z8.
>>4307195i actually prefer the look of images taken with a7iv sensor.a good/bad lens makes or breaks the image quality but no matter which lens you put on a1, the images always look digital/robotic... idk how to explain it. they look like AI made them