PENTAX BTFO
>>4293617not being completely useless really helps in life
>>4293617>>4293611>>4293603I do not understand people like you. You complain about being broke, everythign being overpriced but refuse to attempt to make more money because itd be too much of a bother. Well you cant have it both ways nigger so either work more and stop struggling or enjoy the freedom of poverty.
>>4293645those people exist and they try to pull you down. either by poisoning your mood or by enacting bullshit laws that just tax you. ignore them. and when it gets too much just kill them.
>pentax announce film camera>HELL YEAH>rollei announce film camera>SkepticismWhat gives? Is it cause China bad?
>>4293808>Japanese photography company with decades of experience making high quality productsvs>A chink company who bought the rights to a name who churns out trashIt is one of the great mysteries of our time
>does anyone here like the process of photography more than actually taking pics?I must admit, I only care about photography in the sense of film (or other analog methods) and have zero interest in digital. I really enjoy playing with changed in the development, various film stock or developers and how they interact. I also enjoy dry and wet plate photography and making my own plates and so forth. I recently got an enlarger to get into attempting prints. I do all of this with zero skill at taking "good" pics, I mostly just take pics of my wife and kids and random shit on my farm and play with the process. Is anyone else like this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750
>>4293727He is so obsessed with me, not OP, he schizo spergs out whenever he gets even a whiff of someone that could possibly be me. Dude is obsessed and rent free beyond belief.I feel really sorry for him because I know I'm a much better photographer than him, and that's why he hates me.
>>4293651Go hang there then. You won't be missed.
>>4293730Who are you again? Moop?
>>4293650Photography is a distraction from the real task of making cinema, and playing with negatives and chemicals makes it even better at that. Call me crazy but I love the smell of diafine after some uses.>inb4 muh carcinogens
>>4293738I'm just the dog hair negative guy. Relatively new here, but making big waves. Lol. My combination of good photography, gearfagging, and hairy negatives really gets the losers/anklebiters seething.
last one had 349 posts, let's begin again[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2013:01:12 23:51:24
Mirrorless camera sensors bounce around in the housing unless they're on in which case the IBIS keeps them in check. I know this is normal, but what if I have to travel a very bumpy path to get to the location of a shoot? And I mean by skiing/hiking there. I'm sure it's fine but it's quite off putting.
>>4295696Apparently there was a study done by NASA or something to find out which material was the best for transporting delicate camera gear and they came to the conclusion that standard bubble wrap provided the most shock absorption.
After 4-5 years and only 7000 actuations the shutter on my A6000 has managed to die on me. Not sure what do now, is it even worth a repair or should I just buy a new body? I already mostly use vintage Nikkor lenses so maybe a system change wouldn't be bad, I don't know.
>>4295953Could be worth just getting something newer. 6300 and up gets you a better EVF, good for focussing manual lenses. 6400 and up gets you a touch screen, good for choosing an AF point although that doesn't matter much for you. 6500 and up gets you IBIS which is a really good thing to have. 6400 and newer (so not the 6500) gets you a bit better menu system. 6600 gets you better battery life and a better grip and an extra customisable button.
I have a Lumix G95, had a Canon DSLR in the past though.I remember being able to set a narrow AF point with the touchscreen on the Canon. This Panasonic lets me choose a 3x3 grid out of a 7x7 (49 points), I keep trying to focus on things and the 3x3 grid is too bigHow do I select just one rectangle? Is that even possible?
Here we post images straight out of camera. Without any editing done. Pls include EXIF if possible.On topic: How can I improve the OM-5 b&w SOOC images. I think they're always lacking no matter how much I play with the settings. Anyone got a good recipe?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:03:11 09:56:51Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3888RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>Error: Your image contains an embedded file.Get fucked hiroshimoot
>>4293247anon I went with your settings and didn't fuck with exposure correction. I mean I could always adjust those -0.5ev or whatever in post so fuck it. and I'm really glad I did. the images are now more to my liking. thanks for your help[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:03:12 08:12:30Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3888RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4293559I only wish you could make those SOOC oly b&w's a little more warmer. But it's ok - it's the medium. So I don't complain.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:03:12 08:12:14Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3888RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
nigga get your cats outta there it's not sanitary
>>4293564but how would they stay fresh?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:03:12 11:29:55Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3888RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Post pictures you made with a Canon™ camera
>>4284544>an absolutely abhorrent photo>a canadianEvery time
>>4284830Ah sorry lad I didn’t realize the cum thread full of cumposting was meant for our serious work! My mistake.
>>4284830>canadians get shit on even on the /p/ version of /cum/beautiful aint it?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5Lens Size18.00 - 55.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.1Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:01:28 19:55:53Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/20.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/19.9Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length32.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeCenter-WeightedSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeManualDrive ModeTimedFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineSelf-Timer Length2 secMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceFluorescentExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Color Matrix135
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:01:06 11:42:28Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000Exposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID6b201c3686994acc86214eb188fa2bea
why aren’t you shooting soviet, anon?>cheap as shit>normies think it’s a leica >smells good like old milsurp>fun vintage class>stronk like the strongest soviet proletarian here is my zorki-4. lever advance-cels are seething right now.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1170Image Height854
>>4291954I mean the KMZ Moskva was a 6x9 rangefinder camera if you are into that sort of thing.
because fuck socialism
>>4292084This, much of the NKVD hate is unfair and gay
>>4292188I do have one, but I want a 4x5 made by commies.afk they only made one and its more expensive than a Technika lmao.
>>4293235If you are a real American you would have already posted your Argus C3 by now.Away with you, communist spy.
Any good vintage fisheye lenses? I have saved a lot of money with old eastern bloc m42 hardware. There don't seem to be a lot of ultra wide angle ones, though.
>>4287194> top tier glass Do you mean cinema lenses from Cooke or Arri that cost more than a new car? I’d rather just rent that glass.
>>4287194Can’t you use a Meike or a Sigma and throw pantyhose or a diffusion filter such as the Hollywood blackmagic or pro mist or black pro mist on the lens and get the character of top tier glass. Why would you need to buy a lens with character when you can just throw a diffusion filter on a super clinical lens to get the same effect. You are right you can’t add realistic character in post but you don’t need to do that. Throwing some type of diffusion filter or streak filter or a combo of different filters will get you any character you want.
>>4287343>cinema lenses from ArriActually made by fujinon.
>>4287194>mitakon, irix, voigtlander, zeisshow do these 4 make the same list?
>>4287384scheisschizo has those shizo theories, that's all>reminder he was mad at Eggy because people actually like his photos despite him using Sigma, scheisschizo's most hated brand
I want to do timelapses of mushrooms growing indoors with my E-M1, as well as some photography with a trinocular microscope. Am I totally wrong in thinking my E-M1 Mark III and 60mm macro lens would be all I need for this? I'm a total amatuer, so not sure if I need a totally different bit of kit for this sorta stuff. I only own the 60mm macro and E-M5 right now, so was gonna upgrade to the E-M1 Mark III mostly for this purpose (it can be powered over microUSB, making time lapses feasible).
>>4293452I did not know this. Be thankful you were born with a decent IQ, it must be nice to have an operational efficiency greater than a tortoises. So I just buy one of these for my E-M5 MK II and I could've been doing time lapses this whole time?
>>4293453that and a intervalometer and a big enough memory card is all you need
>>4293451All nicer gear would do is improve image quality. You can even do this on a film camera with an intervalometer. You can power any camera through the battery port btw
>>4293451>Am I totally wrong in thinking my E-M1 Mark III and 60mm macro lens would be all I need for thisMaybe? How much magnification do you want on your mycelium? >trinocular microscopeA real light microscope like that is going to get you waaaaay more magnification. Award winning macro is typically done with a microscope objective adapted to a camera. With this kind of setup focus stacking is usually required, but it'd get you a lot closer.
>>4293456>>4293457So weird, I made this thread last fall and got wildly different answers, no mention of a dummy battery or intervalometer. Appreciate the feedback. Any run of the mill intervalometer will work with the E-M5 MK II?(decided to wait last time since I decided I wanted a dedicated space for photoshoots, rather than risking setting up my camera in the fruiting room - a humid room with sticky spores flying everywhere).>>4293461To clarify, I was going to use the 60mm macro for capturing the growth of fruiting bodies over time, as well as macro-level growth of mycelium on agar. I was going to use the trinocular microscope + E-M1 to capture hyphae and stuff like that (beyond what is typically called 'macro'). Pic rel is one of the style of scopes I want to get.
ITT: Camera and lens combos that look stupid but get the job done
>>4293367uuääÄÄÄHHH thats like THE lens ive been oogling for 2 years now FUCK
>>4293424yeah, any ideas? aside from a green nikon zf?>>4293424really, why? i got it for 6 dollars thrifting[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4293441meant to tag >>4293410 for the first part mb
>>4293441>i got it for 6 dollars thriftingholy based, best I got was a Miranda 300mm f/5.6 for about 8 burgerbux
>>4293441The EOS 600 in my photo actually isn't that far off with the dark grey. That teal logo is a perfect match for the ring and distance markings on the lens though.If you're not bullshitting that's a hell of a deal. There's a few of them on Ebay and most are way overpriced for what they are. There is a really cool "rare" light grey one on there, not the exact same model though. There's also a cheap AF model from Japan, but it's Nikon screw drive.
What does /p/ make of this thing?It corrects your shots for you. In many different ways.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1077Image Height1077
>>4293262>i don't work for these people they work for me >to save 10c I posted this thread myself
>>4293244I saw it was attached to a fuji and immediately guessed that it was a scam. I was right!
>>4293244The stitching feature is really cool and I'd love something like that I can use when neededBut I'm not going to buy a 400 USD gimmick to do that, I'm going to wait a couple years until this software is integrated natively in cameras, I recommend you do the same and do it "manually" (even photoshop cs6 does it automatically), you'll be fine.Still pretty cool, inconvenients far outweigh the benefits though.
>>4293308A computer will always get more accurate results with more control than sooc. Aooc features are largely ignored for a reason. Artists dont want to use them. They dont want to use gameboy buttons and tiny screens. They want to put an SD card into their macbook. If they did not they would take and view everything on a phone.
>>4293317>macbook
not great, thanks though.
>>4290790Why did you shoot that in color?
>>4290790at first I thought I didn't like it, but the more I thought about how I would improve it, the more I realized that I couldn't and the more it's grown on me.
>>4290790incredible
>>4290895you could try composing it so it doesn't look like the shutter button was pressed accidentally for one.
>pocketable>only 500$ more than a sony rx100>1 inch sensor>F1.63-F4.0 stepless variable aperture>50MP>14EV dynamic range>Four lens, six focal lengths (12mm, 23mm, 75mm, 120mm) >Has actual aperture blades>Real camera grip and menus>can use camera filters>Is also a phoneIs the Xiaomi 14 Ultra the ultimate camera(phone)?
>>4293059Imagine giving marketing material to a multimillion dollar company for freeCouldn't be me
>>4291048>900 quid for chinky snapshot phone.Nah I'm good thanks.
soooo it's literally just a smartphone camera but without the phone specs??
>>4292943>>4293062no one wants to see pics of your cat and street signs retard lmao
>>4291048Just buy a used s21 ultra or s22 ultra and safe the rest for some proper gear.
Does anybody have the files for the old /p/ books? IIRC, I think I had photos in the first three. I have no idea if any were made after that, as I sorta fell off the board, and now I don't have any links. Weirdly enough, you can still buy the second and third, but fuck that. Ain't nobody got time or money to spend on those. Anybody have the original PDF's?
what would you call this genre of image?i find them very pleasing and i want to find more but i dont even know what to be looking for[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height810Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4292823Postmodern realism
>>4292827raelly?
>>4292823That is the best version of DDR. Legitimately jealous that this guy has an Extreme arcade machine.
>>4292823mental illness
Wrong priorities
More than anything, why and when did you start doing photography? Do you ever regret it?
>>4289362>2014, to take pictures of women from far awayhobo with a camera tier
>>4289362Miroslav tichy influence?
>>4289353Only honest /p/ poster
to incentivize myself to get out of the house and stop being depressed and alcoholicat the very least im not depressed anymore
found dead snake, posed it, took a photo>this is fun, I should take more photosbought a camera