File: _IGP8940.jpg (1.1 MB, 2400x1596)

1.1 MB JPG

other thread finally died so I can post this here now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-x
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	46 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:08:11 13:27:52
Exposure Time	3 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	30.63 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1596
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: PICT7415.jpg (476 KB, 1728x1152)

476 KB JPG

I found a spyder too last weekend

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:07 18:25:14
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.7
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	560
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	80.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: purple.jpg (4.34 MB, 6000x4000)

4.34 MB JPG

>>4357806
Another f11
>>4360336
That's good, especially with the moist mushroom and water drops. Those tend to look lifeless when very dry.
>>4360310
Oooh, the fabled 1.4/85.

Big, possibly credible preleak about the K-1 mkIII was posted recently:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/472583-latest-news-about-coming-pentax-k-1iii.html

Imagine Pentax coming back with THE top of the line DSLR of all time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4360430
>Oooh, the fabled 1.4/85.
it has become my favorite, mainly because I've found I really like the focal length
the actual lens — eh, there's lots of LoCA, kind of disappointing for the price
>>4360430
as long as the K-1 III has comparable AF and framerate to the K-3 III, it'll be worth it to me
happy with my mk1's sensor but I realize they have to change it, don't think I'll be unhappy with whichever they choose to replace it with
>the 4 metal rods with the ball heads are designed as telescopic rods, which means they can be pulled apart in a similar way to old radio antennas.
neat, I was hoping either for a normal flip display or this, first time I saw the K-1's rods I thought it would be cool if they telescoped so you could get more range
but also sounds like it's as sturdy as I was afraid of

File: PICT7713.jpg (522 KB, 1728x1152)

522 KB JPG

>>4358975
Here you go
https://litter.catbox.moe/msury1.PEF

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	72 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:14 16:33:05
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	48.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4360602
Yeah I do that out of necessity, but if they release it as stable, one would expect it to be

>>4360604
>the airbags were released as safe
>this will totally not give you cancer
>ddt is good for me
kek trusting corporations

File: sony, sony everywhere.png (186 KB, 1110x414)

186 KB PNG

>>4360606
>Thanks for trying it out for us! no refunds.
How deep does the rabbit hole go? What else are they hiding?

File: bricks.jpg (166 KB, 660x740)

166 KB JPG

>>4359649
How will Sony bros ever recover from this?

>>4360706
>Thinking anyone on /p/ actually buys newer cameras that cost more than $2k
Most would max out their credit cards, those that would not would catch shit from their rabbi
>How will Sony bros ever recover from this?
By selling their a7rv in anger to /p/ for $1750 via ebay

>>4357545
Ken/10

>>4348582
you take me to another place
thank you

File: DSC02448 1.jpg (2.93 MB, 2102x1402)

2.93 MB JPG

Why are the buildings in my photos always tilted? NEVER are they straight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2102
Image Height	1402

>>4360710
I wish I wasn't phonefagging to shoop Kens face into Ben 10

>>4360729
love thisone

>>4359291
You should consider not shooting wide open and either using auto ISO or setting ISO based on the lighting you're working with so you don't need to shoot wide open at a slower shutter speed.

For stopping down, if it's dimly lit and you can't use flash you're kinda fucked. Better to try to flatten the image plane if that's the case, in this case asking the girl to move closer and the guy to hold the card closer to the plane. It looks pretty dim this photo but of course hard to say without being there. What was your shutter speed, aperture and camera model OP?

>>4359291
no, since there is no balut and red horse beer.

>>4359291
the person behind the camera could be giving them the middle finger. that isnt very nice.

>>4359291
Go chicken find your new joy...

File: _MG_1326.jpg (1.11 MB, 4926x3281)

1.11 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 700D
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Lens Size	1.00 - 65535.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.1.5
Lens Name	1-65535mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:09:16 11:15:54
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	65535.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4926
Image Height	3281
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Spot
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	135

>>4359772
u mad?

>>4360216
Reckon you got any value out of it over say the 24-105 USM f/4.5-7.1? Consoomer RF lenses are all significantly slower and I hate it.
>B-b-but IS! So light! Control ring!
My old EF telephoto is a stop brighter than the RF equiv. Which is a joke.

All I'm saying, is you probably did the right thing by getting that L if you use it enough. Buy once cry once.

>>4359274
>I would rather use micro four thirds than a cannot POS R. at least the small zooms are weather sealed.
I would rather nophoto nocamera shills stay off the board.

>>4360651
>Nophoto bitches about other nophoto
Many such cases

>>4359514
Are you retarded or something? Literally every mount has variable aperture zoom lenses.

File: 100_5903_01.jpg (3.52 MB, 3954x2966)

3.52 MB JPG

>>4360379
And the after. The before is straight off the memory card on a fairly entry level camera from 2010 that was dropped often

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Camera Model	KODAK EASYSHARE M550 Digital Camera
Camera Software	NX Studio 1.7 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:15 08:09:43
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	64
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.05 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3954
Image Height	2966
Exposure Index	64
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4360381
Isn't editing digishit pics sort of missing the point of digishits?

>>4360387
no, its using what you have instead of consooming
>i need to buy a new camera for the jpeg converter and raw noise levels! -consoomer gearfags
>capture one to topaz my lumix gf1 and canon powershot everything now -smart people

>>4360428
I mean there's definitely some sharpness and AF differences, but I was doing it to fuck around. My camera phone at the time took better photos (OnePlus 7), but I also fell for the sovl meme and realized photography is more difficult than just point and shoot. Most of the pics I took inside the coliseum and museums I went to all fucking suck and honestly aren't worth keeping either. Hell even a lot of the landscape/street photos are out of focus

My Nikon Z50 mogs FUCK out of this as it should, but it made me appreciate point and shoots for the simplicity and ease of carry. It's hard to carry this thing nearly as easily as any of the options I mention below, 2x with the 50-250 lens on it. I'm keeping a eye out for a cheap high end point and shoot, probably a $3-400 Sony ZV1, RX100 III, or a Ricoh GR. Maybe a Lumix GX85 and stock lens. There IS value in something between a APSC/FF ILC and a camera phone, especially if your camera phone fucking sucks at photos or you want a telelens for any actual focal length

File: 1726402363053428.jpg (636 KB, 3166x2375)

636 KB JPG

>>4360379
>>4360381
whipped this up in a couple of minutes

>>4356366
> a re-engineered battery connector specific to HERO13 Black

you can tell it was an indian who proposed this, there is 0 reasons to do this. Now people have to buy another bulk set for their multi action camera kit.

>>4356366
GoPro Hero2 was the last GoPro worth buying. Everything since has been trash.
GoPro has never made proper software btw.

File: 1569920439_img_1260782_500x500.jpg (19 KB, 500x500)

19 KB JPG

Bought a Max 360. How badly did I fuck up?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	500
Image Height	500

>>4360386
Eh it’s old and the insta360 has really come out ahead as a better camera, but at the end of the day best 360 camera is like best turd, you know? The footage is all gonna be kinda shit but with the 360 gimmick.

>>4360457
>The footage is all gonna be kinda shit but with the 360 gimmick.
I think I see what you mean. Still, after trying it out, I'm kinda digging it. It's a pity I got it so late, would have been more fun during a proper summer.

>>4357386
I swear I'm the only sane non-faggot Australian in this country

>>4357631
Oh yeah, which country?

>he gets paid by sony
>she gets paid by cannon
>neither had actual opinions

I hate this teal and orange retard so much.

>>4357492
He is gay.
See: >>4357485
Just look at him.
Doesn't take an AI to know.

Gays often have a "girlfriend" (fag hag) to cover up the fact that they're gay with plausible deniability. "Nah bro, I'm not gay, check out my girlfriend!" and she plays along.

>>4357560
You hate influencer faggots and grifters.
Most actual photographers don't have YouTube channels or social media or any Adobe software.

>>4360289
Have you contacted them?

>>4358859
ehem
>pentax

>>4359989
4.5 is cringe

>>4359989
How the fuck is this not f/2.8?

>>4360484
Ask canon and nikon, who could not make an f2.8 pancake without external focusing. Nikon couldnt even figure out filter threads.

>>4241745
I hate people like that. Why not share those photos with the rest of the world.

File: IMG_5860.jpg (903 KB, 1361x919)

903 KB JPG

>>4318583
Not uncommon back in the day, but seems strange they would do it for a class photo. Seems like the sort of thing you would do with family only.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36389581

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1361
Image Height	919

>>4355769
The excess deaths in those days were surely due to quack doctors giving all sorts of "medicine" to cure what have you.

bump

File: g t 1898.jpg (183 KB, 1240x744)

183 KB JPG

>>4241034
The first known photograph of a climate girl

>>4358350
But it focuses on people! PEOPLE!

I really like my S5, got it cus I rented one before for a cheap short film I shot in school and I really liked the result. The kit lens is really really good, and I love how it renders for video, plus the codec is very flexible for color grading.

That being said, I come from shooting Canon and I just don't really get how to get the colors the way I did with my old Canon. I really like the higher detail and low light performance (going from APSC to FF) though.

Feels a bit limiting to only do video, but it does it really well, so idk, any tips for getting better colors from JPGs on the S5? Any way to get more out of the inbuilt picture styles? (or tips for processing on the photoshop RAW processor)

>>4357008
>Desolate mount
That's more the fault of Leica developing the mount, it only recently became an open standard

>>4360160
Learn Darktable or Lightroom

>>4360243
trying out darktable and it's very good, feels better and more precise than lightroom while still feeling easier to use

thanks for the tip!

>>4359791
Photobombed with what? Subpar quasi art 3/10 snaps? Dude is also like 40 and still posts on 4chan LOL

File: 2P8ML.jpg (25 KB, 399x385)

25 KB JPG

>seething schizo is having imaginary convos with himself again

>>4359940
Put your trip on, Honey. It's been 25 years of posting on 4chan yet you still have to make a decent picture.

>>4359940
Sad. Many such cases.

>>4359940
>>4360255
samefag

>>4358290
rural Alabama. does it look nice

>>4358255
yeah just crop da hand and da ugly ass truck

>>4358247
wtf where did the car go

File: wp-sky.png (1.42 MB, 1920x1080)

1.42 MB PNG

>>4358224
no AI needed

File: wp-center.png (1.8 MB, 1920x1080)

1.8 MB PNG

>>4360378
or a different crop if you will

>>4359722
no they are not

Scene isn't emo you retarded poser

>>4359722
B&w and increased contrast. Looks like it. They also have that early 2000s digital camera look. Share a pic so we can see what youre doing wrong.