[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: L.png (95 KB, 301x288)
95 KB
95 KB PNG
Do you just perpetually live in a state of PC vs Mac, XBOX vs PS4, Apple vs Android?

I don't understand.

Do you just circlejerk and read spreadsheet specs all day?

At least PC masterrace people get to build their own rig, which would count as a bit of a hobby, I guess. Buy all you do is go to the store, purchase, then yell on the internet how your machine is great?
22 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4358610
truth nuke
>>
>>4359691
I use Panasonic and Pentax, because I'm a real photographer who doesn't care about brands.
>>
>>4358610
>subpar cash grabs by washing machine, scope, and printer companies

As opposed to the printer and games console companies you mentioned?
By your definition ZERO companies are fit to make cameras.
>>
>>4358610
>You have two choices in photography. Canon and Sony. Both are amazing. Everything else is for neurotic copers, contrarians, and the clueless dadographers who are nonetheless gearfags.
Agree except for Sony. Sony cameras are not true photographic tools and never will be.
>>
>>4359958
>>4359962
Sony is the best representation of reality, they make video games after all

File: z6iii.jpg (31 KB, 686x386)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
Nikon-bros, we are so back.
167 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4360139
Huskyfag tier response
>i took a snapshit of my dog i am the camera buying expert
>lookslikemicrofourthirds.jpg
>>
>>4360141
>Huskyfag tier response
Better than being a nophoto.
>i am the camera buying expert
Unironically, I bet I have more camera sales experience than anyone on the board. All I said though, was that Zf is kinda bulky in practice, and Z 40 is decent for the price. I take shitty photos, 100%, which is why I encourage others to post too, show me up instead of being a nophoto.
>>
>>4360149
>i buy a new camera every week to snapshit my dog. i know what really matters.
One day you will wake up and realize a lumix gx8 is more than you need
>>
Jeez, guys, all I was saying was that it's not as monstrously huge a camera as people claim it to be. Anyway, I've just purchased one, so I guess I'll see just how unwieldy my stupid hipster camera is when it gets here. It's certainly not a pocketable camera, but I wouldn't consider the x100 series pocketable either. I wouldn't even put my little Nikon A in my pocket, unless it was a winter coat.
>>
>>4360153
Oh for sure, I don't need much, different cameras are fun though. Last I bought was the Zf, which is coming up on a year. Maybe one day you will take photos.
>>4360173
It's sick, enjoy.

Anyone ever got tail with their camera?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.F721U1UES4EXD1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1079
Image Height1759
52 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359837
>average /p/ creep
>>
keep in mind that all the chicks that were fucked in this thread were 6/10s.
>>
>>4359847
Exactly, the average creep on here needs a gimmick
>>
>>4360099
Implying men here are higher than that or even deserve a 5
>>
>>4360099
Not even

Its an open secret all men with cameras are creeps so all the models that dont have an agent and a bodyguard are desperate 3/10s that are afraid to stand next to a semi-normal man at a bar

File: images (11).jpg (29 KB, 678x452)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
How does one achieve this look? I understand that source subjects (in this case two edgy people) are important part of this aesthetic/vibe, but when it comes to the rest of this image's texture what is the trick here?
>>
why don't you try looking at the catchlights

What would you even do with this?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.F721U1UES6FXGJ
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1080
Image Height1289
28 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359690
You sound like one of those MFT shills lol
>>
>>4355882
As much as medium format film cameras are still expensive (though I have no idea what the price at launch was) I highly doubt digital MF will retain their market value as well over time.
>>
>>4359849
That's the best part, I got mine for dirt cheap and the quality gap is objective
>>
>>4356866
the fuck? sony a7iii came out at $2000 6 years ago, try finding one without 300k shutter count below $1300, they don't lose half their value in 5 years
>>
>>4359512
heheh

File: lolympus.png (412 KB, 638x527)
412 KB
412 KB PNG
>The fujislugs are waking up
41 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4358805
i think it's because normies rent everything else in their life, so the few things they buy to own are getting more expensive
>>
>>4358805
Consumer digital cameras peaked in the mid 2010s and were superseded by mobile phone cameras. With nothing recent worth buying and entry level MILCs dead, the handful of niche camera enthusiasts only have the small collection of late 2010s camera to buy from.
>>
>>4358620
>check eBay
>$300
>>
>>4358812
>imported from Japan
>>
>>4359937
>Top mint exc+++++

File: 546474567.png (1.95 MB, 1414x940)
1.95 MB
1.95 MB PNG
I visited a museum and I got this pic, I rly like it :3
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359835
washed out gross color
needs more saturation
>>
>>4359835
Sony really need to fix their colour science
>>
>>4359860
I like the color, but I could have experimented with different tones and saturation for sure
>>
>>4359835
I can imagine this in the cover of my high school chemistry book.
>>
cool

File: 509.jpg (233 KB, 768x1024)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
This was taken with Canon PowerShot SD10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SD10
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2006:05:10 02:18:23
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Auto
Focal Length6.41 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1
Image Height1
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
10 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_3397.jpg (755 KB, 2048x1355)
755 KB
755 KB JPG
I read somewhere that this was taken on a Canon T90 but I can’t find the source.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1355
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4356057
what does it matter? You'd have to be pretty pathetic to want to seek out his attention.
>>
>>4356081
this
>>
File: 1718258235097383.webm (3.79 MB, 720x1280)
3.79 MB
3.79 MB WEBM
>>
File: 1716244054152908.webm (3.92 MB, 608x1080)
3.92 MB
3.92 MB WEBM

File: ge-spooky.webm (1.79 MB, 806x592)
1.79 MB
1.79 MB WEBM
Do zoomers care about CCD videography? I have some old VHS video cameras I restored that have 1/2" CCD sensors inside and they look great if you bypass the tape and export the raw video right to a capture card.
I've been trying to market myself to zoomers who want the VHS effect but nobody is biting .
108 replies and 38 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4345969
>>4351498
I know you were looking to do actual a/v with the setup anon but if you take these crt tv videos with sonic or other 90s games and intersperse the tv flipping to channel 2-3 with the blue screen or fuzz and maybe some vintage ads and some decent audio work you could probably make a 10-15min ty vid of "pov you got home from school in 1994" or whatever and that'd pop off and be viral. if you can really stack up the footage you could make one of those ten hour videos too (even if it loops or has long periods where the TV is just time counting up/static/whatever) for the nostalgia nerds to watch while they sleep
>>
>>4355759
Thats not a bad idea. Originally the idea was to piece together the whole game as a 1-2hr video and call it POV: watching your brother play sonic because you were too young" or something.
not sure exactly how your idea would work.
i have 3 inputs on this tv, one is for the game console,
one could be for a VCR playing old tv shows on a loop.
the third could be a signal out from my laptop with a fullscreen of a site that shows old commercials streams
Could be a lot of fun but the fact i have to think so hard about what to do to go viral makes me think im not cut out for this
>>
I just got a new battery for my DVD camcorder in the mail and it seems to work fine. Can anyone recommend any specific DVD-RW discs?
>>
>>4359024
Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck. Just use one time use discs and buy a 50 pack of whatever from wherever is cheapest.
>>
>>4359354
>Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck.
how badly? I actually just got a couple in the mail, lol. They seem to work fine (for now), and I'll be using them as temporary storage before I save them to my computer. I don't care about their long-term stability.

File: P1680727.jpg (3.05 MB, 3448x4592)
3.05 MB
3.05 MB JPG
>must not compress photos
>not a social media like IG
>sleek professional look
>meant to show off best work, not photodump
>no coding/webdev knowledge required

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDMC-G81
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)390 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:09:08 18:13:17
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating2500
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length195.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
Host them yourself
>>
>>4359673
>no coding/webdev knowledge required
>>
>>4359671
>>4359680
>I want it all and I want it for free.
Stop making these threads >>4358182 and fuck off you retarded little shit.
>>
>>4359680
git gud scrub
>>
>>4359671
Bruh it doesn't exist.
>Free
>Robust
>Lossless
Pick two. At most kek. Also see >>4359684

File: IMG_0715_v2.jpg (1.48 MB, 2760x1840)
1.48 MB
1.48 MB JPG
Previous thread at limit >>4350809

This gives me vertigo when looked at fullscreen. Don't think I've encountered that before.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R50
Camera SoftwaredigiKam-8.4.0
Lens Size18.00 - 45.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0
Lens NameRF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2760
Image Height1840
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:07:28 17:14:13
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/4.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Image Width2760
Image Height1840
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeTv-Priority
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeMedium
Focus ModeAI Servo
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance7.610 m
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed288
Color Matrix34
235 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359130
thanks man
>>
>>4359066
How are Fuji colors so good?
>>
>>4359066
>>4359066
Anon you should have told those asshole birds to get on the high value side of the image. In the shadow it means the eyes drawn to the bright spot, the people in the background, who then fight with the fighting birds for attention, and the people aren't thrown out enough to make them irrelevant, esp bc they're both looking at us Maybe try a tighter crop on the birdies, like this. And a shorter depth of field would have halped blow those people out somewhat.

But then theres a bird directly behind the other two that should really be clonestamped out bc its white is cluttering up the geometry of the one ahead of it. ...but I'm not going to spend the 2 minutes that would take.

I forgot I'm also wearing my bluelight blocking glasses which make everything more yellow, so I prob fucked your colors to bejeezus and back.

Just like in film, you should develop your photos if you want them to truly be your photos. Otherwise they're just some image data the camera puked up.

MOTHERFUCKING IMAGE LIMIT REACHED?? HOW DARE YOU.
Well I fixed your image, but you can't see it.
>>
>>4359130
>>4359525
meds
>>
>>4359087
Nice, contrasts a bit hard.

File: Street-photography-Cover.jpg (832 KB, 3456x2160)
832 KB
832 KB JPG
Do I use silent shutter or not?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
175 replies and 74 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC05301.jpg (641 KB, 1616x1080)
641 KB
641 KB JPG
>>4357769

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-RX100M7
Camera SoftwareDSC-RX100M7 v1.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationLeft-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:09:08 19:58:59
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating4000
Brightness2.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length72.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1616
Image Height1080
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: DSC05371.jpg (979 KB, 1616x1080)
979 KB
979 KB JPG
>>4357771

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-RX100M7
Camera SoftwareDSC-RX100M7 v1.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)129 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:09:08 20:01:08
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness9.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length46.97 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1616
Image Height1080
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: R1-05986-0035.jpg (757 KB, 1800x1200)
757 KB
757 KB JPG
>>4357769
>>4357767
haha nice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.38
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:08:02 23:41:42
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4354881
Nice nails
>>
>>4355020
>mindbroken
Yikes.

where to learn editing basics? how to have a good personal ig profile? i'm training to socialmaxx in 2025. i want to have an aesthetic profile and a retarded amount of dm's from hot chicks.
i want to learn.

equipment im working with: iphone 15 pro
willing to buy: tripods, lights, etc.
4 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4357200
Tap into gay internet subcultures which are popular in women like dark acedemia, cottage core etc. you have to make art aimed at a community. Choose a subculture and start making curating your profile according to that aesthetic.

Spend two or three weeks on the research about that topic, study everything about that niche. and then when have dissected that aesthetic then start making your shit based on your choosen aesthetic frame work. DM other "creators" and shoot shit with them and if they're in your area try to hang out with them.

Pick a niche
Study that niche
Steal whatever aesthetics that you like
Apply your study on to your practice
Start networking with other creators from your niche

Once you'll put yourself in the cycle for 5 months or so you'll start rolling. Networking is really important don't forget that part, even if you're an introvert you gotta put yourself out there.

For equipment iphone is best for reels and photography.
>>
>>4357200
>>4357321
But if you want hipster points then buy a Fuji x100T

On editing: checkout editing vids on YouTube for whatever fag aesthetic you'll pick
>>
>>4357245
so fucking gay it hurts... this is going to be pretty difficult right lol

>>4357321
>>4357322
thanks for the info mate
>Once you'll put yourself in the cycle for 5 months or so you'll start rolling
yeah i'm thinking the actual start is going to be really hard, growing an account from scratch... but then it should get easier... thx
>>
>>4357200

There is a secret curves preset you can apply to your images and it makes women sleep with you or dm you, they don’t care at all how you look or dress it’s just that exact shadow depth that does it. It’s also critical to have the exact Fuji camera and lens or it won’t work.

It’s strange really that after a million years of evolution it all came down to one Fuji camera and lens but it did.

Good luck studying the test charts, maybe you can figure out which one it is.
>>
>>4357200
>aesthetic = gay as fuck
What has the world come to, bros?

File: R1-01755-0036.jpg (2.02 MB, 2740x1830)
2.02 MB
2.02 MB JPG
Has anyone actually experienced damage to camera film from airport x-ray scanners?

I recently came back from a trip after carrying unexposed film once in my checked hold luggage and once in my hand luggage, so it's been through the regular scanners and also the (apparently more powerful) hold luggage scanners. It's 800 iso, so according to everything I could find online it should've been cooked. But it wasn't: photos came out completely fine.

Has anyone ever actually had a problem with airport x-rays or is this all just a meme?
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: fit_720.jpg (73 KB, 720x515)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
Just get a lead bag and always ask for a hand inspection. Just say its photography film and needs to be hand inspected. The bag is like $30 and its just extra insurance if they do end up putting it in a machine.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution6400 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width720
Image Height515
>>
I get around this issue by just buying and developing the film in whatever place I'm visiting

I know this isn't an end-all be-all solution but it works for a lot of places, especially capital cities.
>>
>>4357027
It’s not the cray scanners, it’s the newer CT scanners. Not all airports have them.
>>
>>4357027
Is that Reykjavik?
looks real familiar
>>
>>4357027
Charter a private flight with carry-on baggage

Just a sensor that attaches to the smartphone.
The best of both worlds.

The smart part of the smartphones.
Plus the big sensor of an ILMC.

If you replace your Iphone 15 with the iphone 16, this device will become smarter too.

Meanwhile the standard ILMC and DSLR will become dumber and dumber as years pass by.
11 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>Storage Internal 64GB + External storage available via USB-C SSD
Not even an SD?
>>
>>4350565
>Meanwhile the standard ILMC and DSLR will become dumber and dumber as years pass by.
Good. Fuck your glowie botnet.
>>
>>4351026
>increasing the risk
>we predict that from 2060 to 2100
This is a speculative paper, and not even stating what you reported.
>nobody said you're dumb because you spend time behind a Leica
If that says something about you is rather that you might be a tad autistic.
>>
>>4350565
>The smart part of the smartphones.

From the FAQ:
>Alice Camera has its own hardware and software processing pipeline inside the camera tightly coupled to the image sensor, allowing fast readout speeds and enabling cutting-edge multi-exposure AI-based computational photography techniques such as those found in high-end smartphones like the Google Pixel. The attached phone is used to run the Alice Camera app which acts as an electronic viewfinder and control interface, taking advantage of the extraordinarily high-quality screens found in modern smartphones, and can also be used to post-process and share images and video taken with Alice Camera using popular third-party apps such as Adobe Lightroom and Youtube.
They are pricing this thing at $1300 kek.
>>
>>4350565
>he needs his camera to be 'smart', whatever that means
Have you thought about becoming smarter instead?


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.