Fat squirell editionold>>4289768
>>4297929Is this penus
>>4297827>reminds me of an autistic handshakewhat
>>4297813Fortunately with digicams it doesn't matter which ISO you use
>>4297944That ND is too strong.
>>4297813I kind of like this one. It looks like a really impressive MSPaint drawing
My gf (female) was asking me about cameras and all the kpop videos and cute pics, I noticed they are just black mist. When will this trend die?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1500
>>4299020female (currently male)
>>4298999she will never be a woman, but will always be autism.
>>4299566post hand
>>4298999>When will this trend die?Basically never, same as bokeh, bitches love balls and glow
>>4299203cinestill look is when halation
>The perfect mirrorless lens doesnt exi-Canon and Sony cucks on suicide watch.
>>4301206Good news, they make that lens. But it’s 24-70. Or 70-200. Both terrific lenses, I use them as my bread and butter.
>>4298609looks cool, I like the small size. Women probably like it, since it is 4 inches long.
>>4298609Fit when you feel like ken>sharpness doesn’t matter>just use this slider>i can’t tell my z8 from my iphone. bravo apple!
>>4301204Skill issue. Set it to ISO btw. >>4298610Theres an aperture ring on the front of the camera grip, fujislug. But yeah this should have been a 3 ring lens like the 24-120
>>4298609>f/4-8sad
been thinking for awhile about maybe opening up my own Used Cameras Shop but not entirely sure where to start or what I need to do in order to get it off the ground and not just be an idea but a plan I can get into action with
>>4295219My local camera shops owner died, they sold it to a young couple.Lots of clamoring on about "servicing the community like the old owners" and all that jazz.Turns out the old man wasnt making a profit just surviving off his profits made in the good ole days.It shut down within a year.Turns out paying MSRP for stuff which has a lower street price online or at best buy isnt a good strategy.Turns out knocking 15% off a used items MSRP when I can buy it for 50% off online is not a good strategy.Everyone used the store as a way to figure out what glass they want, then go and buy it elsewhere for far cheaper.Thats what your store will be. A rental storefront where you dont make money.This is the same problem running shoe stores have.My local running shoe stores charge a like $40 "fitting fee" if you try on shoes and dont purchase them there.
>>4296617How 2 solve:Offer an on-site development service.Also do mail-ins.Boom, infinite profit cus that shit is rare nowadays.And dont keep stock unless you're basically a collector yourself.
>>4296128im not... >:(
coffee shop in the front, camera shop in the backmake it as trendy and histery as possible because that's the type of audience that even uses and is willing to by cameras these days. make it a local thing by having competitions and seminars and things like thatdown side: gays, pretentious hipsters, and uni fags
>>4295219yo
I thought about this. One day, I heard on the radio: "The students of the future will study history in the metaverse." And okay. It's just that then, with AI, they started making fake photos, even with albumin effect, and well made; a few days later on IG, I saw a video of Churchill giving a speech in 1942 against Hitler, denouncing the horror of the concentration camps. It was fake, shot and dubbed through AI. So I thought: what kind of history will the students of the future study in the metaverse? Real, or fake? Very 1984. So I decided to look for real vintage photos, from the mid-1800s to the 1950s, mostly candid shots, mostly private, therefore without surviving negatives. They are images of the real world of the past, without historical or imaginative filters. I scanned them and turned them into NFTs because I believe blockchain technology is the only one - by its nature - that can unite the various metaverses of the future. So these images will survive the continuous and relentless cyclical destruction of paper. I also requested export permission from the Italian State: under Italian law, a country of art, it is illegal to take photos printed more than 25 years old out of the national borders without an export license. So I made NFTs with full intellectual property rights. However, I have the original paper photos from which the scans derive, and upon request, I can send them to the owner of the NFT along with the export license. The recipient of the photograph can decide whether to keep it or destroy it, whether to own a physical or an NFT... but in any case, the image of the real world will survive forever on the blockchain.https://augustojandolo.com/
>>4296095>Regarding fakes, they couldn't exist, because the government said they are real>Who cares if this super fragile, non-futureproof medium that stores things as cryptic codes isn't robustBlockchains. Are. Inherently. A. Scam.Only physical things have value. You are buying into hype related to a speculation bubble. I understand it is more difficult to collect and preserve real things, but oh well, you're a kid, that's why we have rich adults running shit like the library of congress.>omg guys cryptographically signed state authenticity certificate!It's not necessarily real. At least you can date physical things. Digital things are arbitrary, it's an honor system. All digital systems are exploitable. There is no such thing as secure and authentic digital communication. Sorry.
Jandolo Ltd comprises expert antique dealers adept at distinguishing between fakes and originals. While the government adds an extra layer of oversight for materials leaving Italy, there's no censorship, even regarding fascism.Blockchain is fundamentally built on immutability, serving its core purpose. It emerged to bring a sense of seriousness and authority to the web, serving as a natural evolution to fortify the internet's structure for future advancements. The only potential scam within such an immutable environment as blockchain might exploit temporal speed, such as rapid financial gains through online trading.Unfortunately, I'm no longer a kid. I have a PhD in ancient topography and a collection of thousands of ancient photographs. I am well aware of the issues related to preservation, with some non-specialized knowledge in conservation restoration and archival matters. It is precisely for this reason that I believe it may not be sufficient to preserve images of the real world from the past solely by keeping them on their original paper support. In theory, it's too risky.Tell me, have you ever looked at the face, the expression, of one of your great-grandparents? There are archives of photos from archaeological excavations, but are there archives of everyday life photos, not artistically rendered? Archives of ordinary people, in short, of real life?In fact, this is an experiment, albeit quite tedious. My only enjoyment in this? That I personally choose what to input into the blockchain and what not to: this, perhaps, is the only filter that could make the real unreal because - due to subjective inclination - it would tend to sugarcoat it. Do you know where I really messed up? Releasing a project like this after the burst of a global economic bubble ahahahah. Don't apologize, there's no need.
>>4296156I have no further thoughts on your project other than "I like it." I hope it works out in the long run, but only time will tell.
>>4292761thats a new one, a ad disgused as a scizo post. Fuck off with your NFT aids. NFTs are not real.
(Aside from the fact that the project also includes the original antique printed photo...). But, would you - "Anonymous" - be real?
Anything goes even commie block brutalism
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D90Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern776Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:02 19:09:08Exposure Time1/350 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias-1.5 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLeica Camera AGCamera ModelLEICA M11Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:02 12:22:24Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID000000000056EFDD6D5F6BAA14DD4654
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness8.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmImage Width1600Image Height2400RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)42 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-0.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.30 mmImage Width1182Image Height1773RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness10.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmImage Width1671Image Height1114RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
• Theme: Morning• Deadline: From 18 February to 10 MarchTheme:• The photos have to be taken in the morning• The time of day should be inferable from your photoRules:• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.• Three entries per photographer max.• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.Optional:• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4293222and obviosuly forgot image[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLeica Camera AGCamera ModelLEICA M (Typ 262)Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:11 02:52:21Exposure Time1/250 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height3000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID00000000000000000000000001895945Altitude0.00 mTime (UTC)00:00:00GPS StatusMeasurement InteroperabilityDate (UTC)2000:00:00
Taken the other morning but I forgot to post until now[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOnePlusCamera ModelBE2013Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)3 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3120Image Height4160Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:06 07:10:24Exposure Time1/332 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramLens Aperturef/2.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length3.46 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width0Image Height0Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4285064The next challenge will start March 17 solely because I did not have the time to do it last Sunday and starting it in the middle of the week doesn't feel as niceWill post the new voting and results of challenge 56 tomorrow after I come back from workAlso, question, does anyone else need to spend like 5 minutes convincing cloudflare that you are human only to get a minute timeout every time you post?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 14 ProFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Metering ModePatternFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceAuto
What happened to voting for this one?>>4285064
Faulty aperture or shutter? It's a newly acquired vintage lens, and this partial vignetting happened twice out of 20 pics i took.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 14.5 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:02 12:36:38Exposure Time1/4000 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
Shutter timing is off. Time for a repair or CLA but honestly the body might not be worth the trouble.
>>4300692>The fact it's only on the right side, which would be at the bottom for the vertically travel shutter when in portrait>he holds the camera upside down (grip up)everyone, laugh at this loser with me
>>4300722How else would you do it, tuck your elbow in like some faggot?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 14.5 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:02 11:40:56Exposure Time1/1000 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4300723I'm willing to bet it's on the lens (or in the mount)
>>4300720>Shutter timing is off. Time for a repair or CLA but honestly the body might not be worth the trouble.Can't wait for global shutter to become affordable and less noisy so we don't have to deal with those antiquated moving parts.
I don’t own an 85 yet, is 0.8f really worth 4times the price?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1268
Unless you are a professional, don't get the f1.2I have the f2 and it's great. I don't even often use it because I really gravitate towards the f1.8 35mm and the newer f2.8 28mm
>>4297531>cannot pos r users think weather sealing is only for professionalsthis is how olympus and pentax users got such big egos
>>4296476espio weather sealed 135 film compact seems good idea, too bulky thoughk7 sooc jpeg is nice
>>4296484This camera will be a sought-after collectible in 19 years, trust me.
>>4296301f/1.2 is god tier[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6Camera SoftwareVer.03.50Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern1084Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:27 11:19:33Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/1.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6048Image Height4024RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
I have $300 to spend on camera gear.Talk me out of buying a Sony SLT and a small army of depreciated Maxxum lenses.
>>4298560>Comparing this choice with a Sony A77Pros: full frame, magic lantern video shenanigans, metal body, weather sealed, fancy low light whateversCons: the whole fucking camera is $300 in KEH bargain condition and none of those come with kit lenses all of which are considerably more expensive than a-mount, the whole suggestion is outside my budgetIn other words I would if I could, but the budget here includes glass, not just the body.
>>4298595sorry, should've realized they went up. got a 10k shutter count 5D2 and a 50mm 1.8 myself in 2022 from ebay, $300 for both with a CF card
>>4298513SLT sucks dix and if it's IBIS is still working it'll stop soon. If you want to use Minolta glass buy an E-mount body and LA-EA2/4. That will be essentially an SLT but you'll be able do leave the retarded half-mirror at home when you don't need it.
>>4298935Those adapters are $200 on a good day, at that point I think I'd just buy an A700 for the Minolta glass I already have and spend the other $200 on an entirely separate camera.
>>4298513>300Save it for a good cam body or a good lens if you already have a good cameraWith a budget like that you might as well go for a point and shoot like the powershot g9, the lx5, rx100. Or an old mirrorless alpha nex 3/5/6
You know the type, dishonest to the core. It pretends to be art and simultaneously to "tell it like it is". Usually shot anywhere from 28 to 58mm. Often black and white, often presented as "telling stories" even though there's no story at all. Most prominently presented as "street photography" even though it's not its only form. You take the art of photography, hollow it out and fill thay soulless husk with nonsensical, neurotic justifications for it and are left with fraudulent pseudophotography.
>>4300332>bagholder opinionsdiscarded
>>4300200Many such cases, sad!
>>4300256>>4300258And yet, such pose had to be "unposey" enough to fool the intended audience into thinking it was a lucky accident. That's street at its most fraudulent, faux casualty for "street cred". The final product is worse than both a normal staged shot and a lucky snapshot.
>>4300186
>>4300187Community Ass?
I love to take pictures of this places and come here, they have beautiful aesthetics[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeXiaomiCamera Model22120RN86GCamera SoftwareMediaTek Camera ApplicationMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Height3072Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:29 00:08:52Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4080Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNot DefinedColor Space InformationsRGBImage Height3072Brightness0 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time70009/1000000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8Image Width4080ISO Speed Rating6400Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFocal Length4.19 mmScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceOther
2/2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
All pictures ITT are underexposed
>>4300112>everything needs to be HDR with no pure black at all
>>4299163aesthetic af, makes you wanna look into the shadows to see what could be lurking
>>4300112Erm, well, actually a proper exposure is whatever you wanted it to be
Home Development EditionPrevious thread >>4296564/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4300858Ofc, godspeed. I need to do the same with some of the markings on my om-1 actually.
>>4300886>om-1Good taste, it's my favourite cam (and i had the stupid idea to sell it to buy an Om2, which i'm neutral toward)What's your favorite lens to use on it ?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4298557Do you have no shame?You unironically go out in public with that thing?God what a faggot
>>4300910That guy's neck is going to thank him after some years
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:03:11 13:11:10
Has anybody tried Evoto?Its AI retouching software that can basically do skin editing for you?It costs a bit but I am so sick of editing peoples skin.Also anybody know any other good auto editing software for portraits? I am after a dodge and burn look with a few button clicks. I dont even care if its not perfect, just something that will do a passable job.
>>4300440That example isn't a simple retouch, it flat out changed her skin tone and gave her lipstick. I hate editing skin too, but I thought the point was to just clean it up.
>>4300497>set camera color profile to portrait>turn off RAW >shoot jpg>import into Photos on Apple device of your choice>???>Auto Enhance
Why even do that? They fancy themselves white with a 56% face, or just need small imperfections removed?
>>4300498>letting your manufacturer decide the tonalityCuck
>>4300440>Skin retouchingWho does thisImagine shooting corporate portraiture or high end weddings lol that would ruin photography forever and stick you with an x100 and snapshitting building corners to grasp at a sense of normality. Just work at microsoft supervising h1bs at that point. Same amount of suffering, higher pay.
Everything Polaroid. Cameras, film, polaroid now.Post your instant works.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1291Image Height1592Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:11:08 16:44:58Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1145Image Height1406
Finally got around to buying a pack of film, looks like the 636 someone gave me a few years back still works fine (except the close-up lens is stuck, nothing of value lost there)
>>4299527It’s iso800 it’s more sensitive than any Polaroid, you sped
>>4300168Really? Any polaroid?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution0 dpiVertical Resolution0 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1313Image Height1600
>>4300276Well if we’re posting old out of production expired shit then anything goes and there’s no point. Good luck getting 3000 out of that ancient stuff kek
Does anybody here have any thing to say about the Instax EVO? I’ve considered getting it because it doubles as a photo printer and I can see the photo and change filters without wasting film.
