[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography


Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 2400_01.jpg (8 KB, 400x193)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
Thinking of getting a plustek scanner to scan negatives. But my family also wants to scan all our photos too. What's a good scanner for this? Doesn't have to have a document feeder since family willing to take shifts scanning the photos, so it can be a bit slower.
26 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169097
That's with a film holder on and some slide film photoshopped in.
>>
If I'm looking for a dedicated 35mm scanner for less than $500 cad, which are the best options? Plusteks that much better than a v550?
>>
>>3170553
If you just wanna shoot 35mm and not medium format or prints, then yeah go for a Plustek.
>>
>>3170573
Cool which one?
>>
>>3171618
8200i SE is probably your best bet.

File: IMGP0574.jpg (298 KB, 1472x622)
298 KB
298 KB JPG
I bought a Pentax K-1. How'd I do?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:10:16 07:34:59
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/22.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
10 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3171193
You bought a D800 clone with less available lens selection.

>congratulations.
>>
>>3171193
>I bought a Pentax

Well, there's your problem.
>>
>>3171580
for half the price of the d800, with a lens collection that got high quality lenses of every focal length youll need. who needs 3 80mm lenses anyway?
>>
>>3171193
>bought a camera
>used the camera

You're already ahead of most /p/eople here.
>>
>>3171222
Just outside of Kremmling, CO.

File: mac tonight.jpg (931 KB, 3264x1836)
931 KB
931 KB JPG
Should I "graduate" to a DSLR?
I'm tired of being unable to set shutter speed, ISO, aperture and focus manually.
Or am I too shit and it would be useless to get a DSLR?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeBlackBerry
Camera ModelBlackBerry Z10
Camera SoftwareBlackBerry 10.3.3.2205
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:10:06 19:02:16
Exposure Time3/50 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
ISO Speed Rating70
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance1.54 m
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.04 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3264
Image Height1836
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
43 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169634
>If you're just using it to "look cool" the result is everyone making fun of you like Star Trek Discovery.
kek
>>
>>3165749
vapai canario
>>
Nigga if you need more control out of your camera then YES upgrade. Why are you even asking us such a dumb question.
>>
>>3170964
Ayyyy
>>3170975
I keep wondering if a DSLR is overkill
>>
>>3171130
Worst case scenario, you end up selling it. Get a DSLR where the body doesn't matter much and where you can hoard lenses for the future.

File: hqdefault.jpg (38 KB, 480x360)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
So this word "microcontrast" or "pop" "3d look" has been coming up more and more recently.
But noone can really quantify it or measure it.

What does /p/ think?

Here are a few links on the topic
http://www.artphotoacademy.com/the-leica-look/
http://www.dslrbodies.com/lenses/lens-articles/what-is-micro-contrast.html
http://yannickkhong.com/blog/2016/2/8/micro-contrast-the-biggest-optical-luxury-of-the-world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5QJLg3VdRI
that dude has tons of videos on that topic and is obsessed with it.
44 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3166716
what lens?
>>
>>3166716
>micro-contrast is nothing to do with sharpness, right?

It is REAL sharpness.

What people call "sharpness" is actually resolution.
>>
My dear /p/hriends, have you all been trolled by the industry?
Microcontrast thats not dynamic range, because its only good for shadows? Are you...fookin kidding me?
Pop? What?
3D Look? To capture a 3D image, you need it photographed from 2 angles and then create a stereo image. A single photo cannot have a 3D look without being 3D, which they are not.

Maybe the images meant to show off the microcontrast. are just done by using the Brenizer method. Look it up.
PS im not seeing any 3d look or pop or whatever. The ballerina has very good image quality but thats about it.
>>
>>3169383
voigtlander 58 1.4
>>
File: 1481323221456.jpg (7 KB, 267x323)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>3166528
Wow that yannickkhong article is just pure cringe

File: 2017-08-20_12-11-32.jpg (268 KB, 1600x1063)
268 KB
268 KB JPG
/o/ here. How can I take better pictures of cars?

>pic related, first time using aperture priority mode earlier today
130 replies and 66 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
NOT MY PHOTO

>>3171367
Also experiment with composition.

Of course it's easier to take an interesting photograph of an interesting exotic car.
>>
>>3171367
>>3171375

I agree totally, man

trying to scope out some new spots I can shoot at night, I rather like having a bg lit by orange street lights with a nice white light on the car, I can see what you mean about the last one I posted though.

it's harder work than I ever thought it'd be to find nice locations for shooting cars at haha
>>
NOT MY PHOTO

>>3171375
Also maybe experiment with different lighting and image processing.

>>3171380
I think taking a good car photograph is pretty challenging since cars are so big and inflexible.
>>
>>3143669
>Lighting is everything.
>sky entirely blown out and photoshopped
>still incredibly boring and lacking any interesting qualities
>>
>>3171390
Based W124

File: IMG_20171016_203420.jpg (2.09 MB, 4640x2610)
2.09 MB
2.09 MB JPG
First off, I'm new to film in general. I've used DSLR cameras just manually focusing and have gotten some decent action shots and shit and done some decent work on just my phone (I upload them on Instagram if anybody wants to look and judge them for me)

Picked up a 35mm Topconn Uni with a 53mm and 100mm lens (pic related) Is this camera and lens set a meme or do I have anything decent?
Furthermore, how do I use this shit? I know how to load the film (I just got some general Kodak Ultramax 400 iso) and expose it but like. There's tons of things to be fucked with on this thing. I want to shoot some stuff for a marching competition this Saturday and want to know everything I need to know. I don't have anything fancy like a lightmeter (which could probably help) I hope you all can help me master this thing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOnePlus
Camera ModelONEPLUS A3000
Camera SoftwareOnePlus3-user 6.0.1 MXB48T 118 dev-keys
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:10:16 20:34:21
Exposure Time1/17 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating2500
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness3 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.26 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4640
Image Height2610
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
4 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Get this trash off my board and come back with an a7 if you want to take decent photos
>>
>>3171484
ASA is an older term for what we now generally call ISO. Match the ISO setting to whatever your film’s ISO is.
>>
>>3171487
REEEEEEE gearfag detected

Just help me with the camera I got, plsthanku
>>
>>3171491
Okay, so I'm wondering how I can set it. It's like a split ring design thing without a dot to line the numbers up to. I guess since like 400 is all the way to the right just pull that all the way to the right?
>>
File: 1478502971399.png (110 KB, 473x263)
110 KB
110 KB PNG
>>3171430
>>3171484
You can find the operating manual of this camera with a google search, it's literally the first result that comes out. I don't know what to say to someone who can't muster the effort to reach out and grab the most basic things and expects others to spoon feed.

I own a Nikon D700.
Today before a shoot, both the lens and camera dropped.
Don't know how the lens managed to come off without being released from its locked bracket but it happened.

Upon inspection the body seems to focus fine from center eye-level downward but if I where to just tilt the camera upward,
the viewfinder instantaneously loses its clear image and shows nothing but a blur as if I completely missed focus.
The only way to get a clear view in the viewfinder again I must tilt the camera downward, focus, & make sure I don't tilt it up more than normal eye level.
I thought it was the lens at first but removed it and tried to look through the viewfinder one more time and It still kept happening.

I suspect is one of the mirrors since at the instant of being tilted upward there is a slight jolt before the blur. It looks more mechanical than electrical.
I'm good with doing technical repairs myself, but never really worked on a camera before. So far I got a service manual for this exact model but need a helping hand of direction before I proceed. Don't really want to mess with it, but seeing as though I can get something newer for possibly twice the repair cost ill take the risk!
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3170778
looks to me like your dioptre adjustment is broken

when the vf goes out of focus, if the readout at the bottom does as well, it'd be 100% dioptre adjustment imo

how involving this is to fix, I'm not too sure
>>
>>3170781
give the camera a bit of a shake, you should hear rattling coming from close to the eyepiece
>>
>>3170785
I hear it! would that be the diopter adjustment anon was referring to? >>3170781
>>
>>3170790
yep, I'm both anons btw lel

see that lens that sits between the prism and the outer lens for the viewfinder?

that is adjustable to compensate for differences in peoples eyes, and yours appears to have a broken adjuster, so it drops back with gravity when you tilt the camera upwards

won't affect your photos in any way, just gives you a blurry finder every time you look upwards
>>
>>3170791
Thanks so much anon! I started taking the unit apart. There’s some screws I have to get through but need to take most of the back housing off. Little project for me in the meantime till a friend finds either the part I need or, hopefully, a broken body I can work with.

Out of my way iPhone/Galaxy plebs. I'll take the photos.
101 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3164710
What the hell are you doing with your phone that cracked screens are a problem?
>>
>>3166697
do you want a phone
or a camera

pick one
>>
>>3166964
Camera
>>
>>3164209
Who the fuck are you?
>>
>>3169935
Never heard of this

File: P1050535.jpg (2.44 MB, 3264x2448)
2.44 MB
2.44 MB JPG
exelente

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDMC-FS3
Camera SoftwareVer.1.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2016:10:06 14:51:38
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.1
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length16.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Image QualityFine
White BalanceManual
Focus ModeAuto
Spot ModeOn
Image StabilizerMode 2
Macro ModeNormal
Shooting ModeUnknown
AudioNo
Flash Bias0.00 EV
Color EffectOff
ContrastStandard
Noise ReductionStandard

File: KwS210C.jpg (125 KB, 644x428)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
I'm only looking for weird shit, not normie horse shit.....i wanna see something confusing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
2 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 18b45fziz05uwjpg.jpg (60 KB, 576x316)
60 KB
60 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width500
Image Height625
>>
File: Jerry Hsu - 01.jpg (116 KB, 638x420)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
>>
File: 1492218404077.jpg (253 KB, 1065x791)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
>>
File: 2002_39.jpg (37 KB, 432x428)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>3171417
Nice, who's work is this?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS D30
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2003:11:25 16:16:37
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.90 m
Metering ModeAverage
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width432
Image Height428

Oh shit /p/...

https://youtu.be/xkmPFwlCISw
30 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169642
Underrated
>>
>>3169606
loling @ u
>>
>>3170555
trips confirmed online h8 speech enjoy ur prison term m8
>>
>>3170958
You can't prove that's not big foot.
>>
Rebecca Leung
@rebeccajleung
Actress | Singer/Songwriter | The Hong Kong Ambassador for @TheProjectHEAL

man wtf digitalrev

File: IMG_20171003_164951.jpg (1.48 MB, 2448x3264)
1.48 MB
1.48 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHUAWEI
Camera ModelHUAWEI CUN-L02
Camera SoftwareMediaTek Camera Application_
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:10:03 16:49:52
Exposure Time30003/500000 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating579
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length3.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2448
Image Height3264
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
72 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169214
Nikkor 80-400 II
Nikkor 200-500
Sigma 150-600
Tamron 150-600
>>
File: 170.jpg (92 KB, 800x600)
92 KB
92 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 4
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.16
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:10:12 13:10:25
Exposure Time1/69 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness5.1 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length3.85 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width800
Image Height600
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3168652
That’s a shadow, pendejo!
>>
>>3169448
sure thing Consuela
>>
About 800mm equivalent.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSony
Camera ModelE6853
Camera SoftwareLightroom Android 3.0.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2017:10:16 17:24:29
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Focal Length4.23 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated

File: IMG_20170926_211442_785.jpg (1.24 MB, 2306x2306)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
7 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3169567

To be fair, mostly I shitpost. But, hey. Lurk for a while, you'd be surprised how much content is actually here.
>>
>>3169285
>>3169285
c tangana?
>>
>>3169561
>I get a response in less than 2 minutes
>on /p/
fucking what
>>
>>3169620

Deal with it.
>>
>>3169285
Not your /p/ersonal army.

Thoughts /p/?
>>
>>3171346
>8 pictures for $20
and they say digital is more expensive lol

Mamiya 23 Standard, 90mm 3.5, Portra

Sorry for the shit white border

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.18.168212136
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2654
Image Height1537
Scene Capture TypeStandard
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3171231
>calm down
Is it just me or is /p/ the most likely board for people thinking negative replies are made by people seething with rage at the keyboard?
>>
>>3171188
>>3171257

Antagonistic samefag
>>
>>3171257
fuck you
>>3171182
if you think its shit why have it. disingenuous prick.
post more please.
>>
>>3171275
Thought it looked cool, changed my mind. Don’t really care

What do you actually think about the picture
>>
>>3171345
Not that other guy but it's not too interesting. The trees on the left are pretty distracting and your position relative to the building does not emphasize its shape. It doesn't make too much sense to be straight-on with that one wall. I get why buildings like this are interesting in this kind of light, but there's little to no context about it.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.