Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
>>4476055No, but photos used on cover box of VHS tapes were shot on film.
>>4474453I can imagine that "the industry" would rather switch to HDR or render the same film in multiple color gradings. Like you get a little option if you want the film to look "lifelike", "vibrant" or "retro"
yeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0
>>4477515what do you mean
>>4474517Bright headlight so it looks like a poor snuff film. More and more popular these days
Are all people in the cinema industry dickheads? Been looking around r/cinematography and people there seem to be a mix of audiophile retardation and pretentiousness of the highest order
I mean at least here on 4chan I get people who love learning from my posts. Reddit never wants to learn, as they just regurgitate bullshit over and over again. And what I write ain't even overtly political like Reddit!
>>4484205Cringe
>>4482143They're white? They give awards to Spanish/Mexican folk from the guilt of it. Asians took to digital media and dick worship the shallow graves of what's left of the french new wave. It all ended with Kubrick.
>>4484763FNW was a mistake. Navel gazing cin*philes.
>>4482143>cinephile here, I watch tv like a professional tv watcher bc this formulaic bullshit written at a 5th grade level is serious business worth discussing as "art">surely everyone here thinks about me and cares about me and keeps track of where I go and post all of my brilliant thoughtsHoooly fuck. Cringe doesn't even cover this. Get a fucking friend.
What's a good way to discover photographers you like, including dead ones? Is Pinterest good?
>>4484740>What's a good way to discover photographers you like, including dead ones?Go to a used book store or your university's library (even if you aren't a student you can get a library card as a member of the public) and borrow photography books. Find something with a focus on historical periods in photography, scenes and movements, or specific photographers. Even if you get one book that is overall on a subject that, after you turn the final page, you have no affection for, you may return it or put it back on your bookshelf at least knowing where you'd like to point your nose next, since you may find an allusion to another photographer or style outside the scope of the book you just read.>Is Pinterest good?Maybe. I like Flickr. Tumblr probably has some blogs you might like and there is a hashtag system so you can jump down some rabbit holes there. This is a queer suggestion but pbase and goat.vision are great resources for viewing sample galleries of specific cameras or lenses, not so much for finding specific photographers though.
>>4484740Reading.
>>4484762+I highly recommend to brief review of each book you read. take a picture of the cover or the most representative picture and write one or two lines of your impression about that book or the photographer.Trust me, it will give you in the future such great insightful database that any other meme youtuber's bullshit reviews could never give. This trick applies to pretty much everything in life though.
It's your 1st amendment rights to use that camera anon.
>>4484129Its competitive camera use, not art. If you dont use a leica and a 24mm-28mm its cheating. Like playing hockey with a lacrosse stick.
forgot about this thread desu>>4484144how so?
>>4484129You say it's fraudulent because of its pretense that ugliness is beauty that deserves to be celebrated?
>>4477140
Do you submit to magazines or prizes? I know the meme is that you can only hope to leave just one or two worthwhile photos after you die. But what’s wrong with trying to build a career?
If I had the money, I'd participate in the Mobile Photography Awards, alas the entry fees turn it into gambling
Dead board.
>>4477903Contests won't help you build your career as much as putting the same effort elsewhere (networking and marketing)Most photo contests are just rights grabs for a company to get free stock photo, they dangle a modest prize, and get back 10x that in photos they can now use for their own marketing purposes
If its free to do and you don't lose rights to your images, whats the harm?I don't do it because my photos are not good though.
>>4484677Find any contest and it's easy to see the problems, even OP's has effectively a +$75 entry feeThe only ones worth doing are small community ones with no real rewards, like we used to have here, and like you can find on other photo forums
Photography has the power to not only document the horrors of the world, but also bear the mark of its maker, for better or worse. It is not simply opening and closing a shutter.Take this evidence that the SS photographer, Friedrich Franz Bauer, implicated himself with. He usually made propaganda of concentration camps to normalize them against any moral outrage. This was part of the Nazi regime's policy to beautify their camps and "Jewish settlements."Here, Bauer takes photos of innocent children in a psychiatric hospital. He knew full well they would face forced euthanasia during Aktion T4. But history now sees this photo as a criminal act, a witness to the worst parts of humanity, as well as a bystander who did nothing to stop the rise of modern evil. Again, photography is not merely clicking a button. It has the power to echo throughout history.
>>4484632
>>4484633
>>4484634
>>4484635
>>4484636
Anyone else like taking photos of mundane shit like stairs when they're on vacation? i feel like no one's taking photos of the stairs and the trash cans so it's my responsibility to.https://files.catbox.moe/ms28zq.jpghttps://files.catbox.moe/x5znqx.jpg
>>4484133use a list of local words as incentive.egskakatcheeeqan idk how you spell it. cool photo, instant updoot
Spooky forest Edition Previously >>4476460
>>4479022>>4479025>>4479054great>>4479168GADAM>>4479932clipped subject :(
>>4480060solid imo. i dig the melo vibe>>4480288oh my>>4480297yes>>4480922I LOVE EM!!! great pair
>>4480943>>4480994nice>>4481259>>4481262saved>>4481439this moves me
>>4481749>>4481750great!>>4481921nicegood rpt
>>4479188Too dark. The lighter one is better.
Looking for pre-2000s landscape photography calenders. Not having much luck. Anyone seen any around?
>>4481652>when I go to a national park gift shop and the calendars are digislop with bad white balance instead of large format velviaMade me fucking sad.
>>4481652as in scans or prints to buy?
Why are image sensors rectangular when a camera’s image circle is… well, circular?
>>4483957So sounds like straight lines are easier then, thank you for confirming
>>4483891The wafers are circular to begin with. Just make the wafers smaller and have one sensor per wafer.
>>4483963Yes, they are, unless you're a physicist, then they're the fallacy at the root of all your nightmares. You're welcome.
>>4484156>not just using the entire wafer at their current sizesensorlet
>>4483892explains why lenses are rectangular and not spherical
Recently got a camera without a light meter, looking for some tips on how to meter by eye.I get the principle behind sunny 16, and have the table in my head, but I'm constantly getting different readings from my (phone) light meter than I'm getting from my guesses using sunny 16. Is it just practice?
>>4484229Where's this? You did a fantastic job of making it very ambiguous
>>4484231in Lyon, I was gonna take a picture of the street but the guy thought I was gonna get him. So I did end up shooting him.it's a cool city
>>4484233ended up*
>>4484234fuck I'm retarded tonight, why did I see a typo thereAlso found this picture I apparently never edited, it's completely off topic but that girl is pretty
>>4481784Shoot the same ISO for a year using one lens and you'll get a good understanding of sunny 16.
what the hell happened to lighting? 40 years ago you'd have a nice controlled hairlight even on a presidential portrait
Ever since the producers of commercials did a study a couple of decades ago and found out that children and people with lower intelligence paid more attention to video if the camera was constantly moving, good cinematography and lighting no longer mattered as long as you had a shaky image. Then it moved on to television programs where it looks like everything was shot handheld. Cheap background synthesized music followed. Works out well for the production company because it saves them money. That migrated into still photography where proper lighting no longer matters as long as you grade your images.
>>4482153
>>4482153Back then you had to get it right in camera. Now every fag thinks they can fix it in Photoshop. That's all has gone to shit
>>4482615You haven't ever met gen alpha. They make ChatGPT do all their homework.>t. Once a Teaching Student
>>4484160yep. we fail them.They were remodeling the floor I'm on and were going to remove the old 1800s copper ceiling panels from the hall, said we'd finally have cell reception out there. I asked to have them installed in our photo lab under the guise of eliminating EM interference with all the sensitive photo electronics. :)No one can get a cell signal in the photo lab.
Explotion
>>4484117Wow!
>don't switch to a new mount in the digital transition so all your customers can still use their old film lenses>pride yourself for upholding true photographic tradition and having the finest lenses with the most "character">release the first full frame camera that can actually make full use of all those "sweet" 35mm pentax lenses in 2016, literally 10 years after the competition>in the meantime only make shitty APS-C kit zooms>Release your only monochrome camera for the true affecionados>It's APS-CWhy is this company such a joke?
>>4486085This is at ISO 6400...my biggest issue is shooting auto (I know I know) the KF/K-70 was kind of dumb...the program line loves to trend towards a higher ISO than it actually needs. K1ii isn't nearly as bad at this aspect I have a line on a KS2 for $150 locally w/18-50mm kit lens + 50mm f2 SMC but its 2 hours away (Allentown PA when I live in NYC) and I think the guy told me to go fuck myself because he quit replying when I said I wanted to keep in touch closer to Saturday to head out there.
>>4486085>not-screw drive lens selectionit doesn't matter if you have screw drive autofocus if you take pictures of servos
A bunch of new firmware just dropped.2025.12.05 PENTAX K-1 MARK II FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (2.51)2025.12.05 PENTAX K-1 FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (2.51)2025.12.05 PENTAX KF FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (1.33)2025.12.05 K-70 FIRMWARE UPDATE VERSION (1.16)
>>4463348update i regret selling my kf for $380 (ended up getting $320) whoever said you're better off keeping it was right the k1 is a fucking chore to bring sometimesbought this k-70 with a broken screen for $105 + getting a ks2 screen off aliexpress for $40, could be aperture solenoid issues (i have a busted 35mm z1p with a mirror that sticks up i can salvage a white solenoid off of) either way its not a horrible job, hoping its the display or something free like they didn't hit the display button>the LCD screen appears cracked and nothing is displayedk-70s sell for $300 on avg in america and japan. cheapest i bidded was $170 for one. also picked up a 50mm f1.4 fa, the 50mm f1.7 f was a great lens but i really wanna try a big fast lens for night photos. they usually go for $80 in japan and $100-140 in usa. >>4486085Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4488885>im a collector atpthis is what I realised when I bought a couple Pentax lenses and I didn't throw away any of the original packaging and I was deadset distraught when I scratched the lens hood on the macro lens I bought. It really fucked me up. I spent the last few months getting so into gear that I became a collector without even realising, emotionally invested in the mint condition of my gear, buying lenses I didn't need to "complete" my collection. Yeah, thank god Amazon's returns policy is ever in my favour. It's fucking unethical that I can return lenses that I used and get full money back. Anyway, I'll leave a report in this thread sliding off the arse end of the catalog:>HD Pentax DA 21mm f/3.2 LimitedBeautiful construction, exquisite even, and so small. The image quality is so high contrast from Pentax HD lenses in general. I'm not sure if it is to my taste. It displays a modest amount of barrel distortion which I find kinda bothersome as a severely autistic person who needs things done in a certain way; I like optical corrections, couldn't tell you why.>HD Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8 LimitedAgain, very sexy looking lens. Much better geometry from this lens but the field of view is a bit tight for walking around town? It'll leave you constantly backing up to get the composition you want which is inconvenient if there's a fence, a wall or a road behind you. Still, it's a lens that works for street photography because it's so fucking compact and a little tight on the FOV to keep you out of the action. The screw-on lens cap was sexy, too.>HD Pentax D-FA 100mm f/2.8 MacroYeah, it's a bokeh beast or whatever but what the fuck is the point of using a macro lens on a Pentax DSLR? Just the slightest bit of wind means that branch is outta focus and continuous autofocus only works until the AF point hits a low-contrast area, then the camera will rack the lens back and forth through the entire zoom range multiple times to no avail.
Hey, /p/.I'm new to this board and I'm looking to buy my first dslr camera. I was wondering if you guys can give a beginner like me some recommendations on what camera to buy. I've heard Canon is the go-to-brand, but I'm not sure what model is the best option. Camera recommendations that won't make me look like a redditor lesbian would be greatly appreciated.I've got about $950 to shell out. Thanks.
>>4482773my favorite post itt unironically shop for a pre-2012 dslr with a good lens selection, preferably from nikon/canon so you can adapt the lens onto a nice newer camera if you like it (think nikon d750/d850 or canon 5div/5ds).my ccd shitters have taught me how to work to get a good photo as opposed to just firing auto and letting the camera do the work. at the end of the day they're fun to use and i love swapping between my k1ii and something like a konica minolta 5d. i suggest a nikon d200 or d600 or a canon 5d 6d or 7d (i like the single digit d models since theyre the pro models vs consumer...better build quality and nicer to use) https://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/pho/d/manassas-canon-5d-mark-camera/7896150454.htmlhttps://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/ele/d/brooklyn-professional-grade-canon-6d/7884263025.htmlpersonally not a fan of pentax or sony for this price range you can get more money and a better camera for the same money (and a way better camera if you upgrade)...the sony dslrs/slts have awful build quality. would only recommend if you found something like a a350/a380/a390 for <$100 or a a68/a77 for <$300. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4480615Unless you're a decent-skilled photographer, the camera you use doesn't matter I recommend using the archive to look at the digishit threads, you'll see some good stuffIn your portfolio, do you even have any photos you took that you unironically think "this photo is dogshit, but if it was in higher resolution it would be amazing"? I highly doubt any properly composed photo goes from being bad to being amazing simply because of camera, don't fall for the consumerist bullshit
>>4483502you're a faggot. post your own pics.
Is it true Asian women find camera guys a turn off?
>>4483502Based
