pictures from a recent trip[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1536
>>4306656Where did you go, anon?
>>4306716Spain, fgt.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4306718careful now Chuck Noland
>>4306716I went to Tenerife, didn't see many beaches but hiked up the highest peak in Spain.
alright faggots. I hope one of you knows what I am talking about. There is a small obscure design/aesthetic website run by a woman designer(I think). one of you posted it here a a year or two ago. I can't find this site for the life of me. She had aesthetics broken down and had sophisticated names for them. like "power neon trip" for early 90s.
>>4305588>strike 1: called me a faggot>strike 2: reddit spacing >strike 3: audacity in daring to use The Goose image>strike 4: I don't know lol but am interested now that you mentioned it
>>4305589>>4305590being this new to 4chan. I actually fucking found in buried in apple notes. enjoy it. https://www.are.na/evan-collins-1522646491/channels?profileId=evan-collins-1522646491&channelId=channels&page=2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.2 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1524Image Height2048Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Created2020:07:11 20:32:27Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1519Image Height2043
>>4305590>>4305589You will never be this cool.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1195Image Height1600Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:08:14 20:40:03Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1123Image Height1306
>>4305596some old hasbeen that got famous for play fighting while on steroids? What a quaint time
>>4305589Nigger do you even know where you ar
board is boring rn so i will make a thread. i'm curious if others can pick up on changes in my pictures over time. so i will go in roughly chronological order, starting from a bit before i actively got into photography[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100TCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:10:11 18:14:42Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness8.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4896Image Height3264RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeOffFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKMacro ModeOnPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>4294262>clicked on all those postspathetic, unimpressive
one last bumperino. check out the followup >>4300071>>4294481thanks, it's one of my favorites from that season
>>4293925Most of your pictures don't show "soul". I'll pick out the ones i do like>>4293930I like it>>4293933I like it>>4293936I like it>>4293940Hahaha he's giving the side eye>>4293955I like it>>4293964I like itComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4302988Maybe you just like candid portraits. I thought the OP pic is the best but portraits aren't my thing.
Your pictures of people really suck, and a lot of your shots are dark for no reason. It's fine to have something like that every once and a while, but you overuse it. That said,>>4293925>>4293933>>4293935>>4293987>>4293999>>4294025>>4294053>>4294443>>4294481>>4294482I enjoyed these.Keep it up, anon!
Does anyone still do microstock as a side hustle?
Have had stuff on Pond5 since like 2009 and shutter stock from like 2012ish. Probably still average like a couple hundred a year these days.That shit got me through high school and college, funding all my photography needs at the time. Peaked at 2k/year on both for a while. Game changing money for a youngster.
>>4306743Lucky you started early. So saturated since around 2015. Can still make decent side income with videos though on pond5 and shitterstock
does anyone know the Olympus OM-1 mark I also has a silver version of it?and does anyone know where I can find a good second hand one from in the UK?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIICamera SoftwareOM Workspace 2.0.2WPhotographerIVOR RACKHAMMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern17660Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:06:15 16:04:52Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-2.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length12.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1306RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4304802>Even the 7d and the 6d aren't made very wellYou could tell that from the AF array and the X-sync speed.
>>4304802>non-spiteful build quality.When are they gonna bring back the metal E-M5?
>>4305151I know right, the mark 2 will always be my fave. So weighty and the last one to keep that metal tripod mount. Worth giving up 4 megapickles for i reckon
>>4304585yo yo yo
>>4306684stop bumping your shitty gear threads that should've gone in sqt. there's nothing to discuss further
>>4304941Yes, it doe seem to be people born in the 90s hitting their 30s. And people born in the 80s hitting their 40s. Each successive generation has been exposed to more environmental pollution than the last, after all.
>>4304946so why aren't zoomers dying on a mass scale
>>4304946>pollution skyrocketed in the past 2 yearsKek
He's most likely fine. We are in an era of cancer over-diagnoses. Everyone has "cancer." The real question is, will it ever become a meaningful issue for your health, and if so, will it kill you before old age does? Hospitals get paid by the patient, remember that in all conversations about what treatments you "need."
>>4306675Its worse than pay per patient. They are paid in WRVUs. These reward more difficult and intensive procedures with more pay, and a larger cut for the hospital as well.It pays the hospital considerably more to remove a benign visceral tumor and tell you it's potentially metastatic cancer than it does for them to over-diagnose cheap little melanomas.
Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses). If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
>>4306583I'm more schizo than that. I believe AI is stealing our identities pretty much... I don't want my sons entire life recorded and stored on some cloud so when he's older some AI robot will look like him from birth to his adult years.
>>4306589The NSA already had automated systems recording hours and hours of your voice to automatically flag you, or not flag you, as a domestic terrorist for future monitoring. What corporations are doing is childs play.it probably won't ever hurt you unless you want to become a major public figure, then come the recordings of you admitting to molesting women
>>4306590Deep fakes. Identify theft is what I'm worried about.
>>4306592They've probably already been doing that. AI voice faking exists, the NSA has been bugging everything forever without a single human eye on most of the data, and a lot of that data includes hours of public figures voices. Who knows how many published phone calls from politicians were actually real and whether or not the man in question got his own phone call in the middle of the night telling him what he already said and that he better go along with it or elseIf all of this worries you, dont shoot digital, the amount of baked in insecurity in all consumer technology is insane. Pretty much every PC made since the 2010s has the possibility of a third party accessing it via a small cell radio even if it is turned off and you think your drive is encrypted. This is a hardware feature, using loonix will not save you, and loonix is such a bloated mess (with lots of state contributions) it's probably bugged too. Shoot film only. Develop your own film. Print your own film, directly on photo paper, in a darkroom. Or use a computer and printer from 2005.
>>4306593Ha. No... the chances become exponential once you get cell phones involved. I'm not worried about other people, humans stealing identity. I'm worried about AI, robots, etc. Non humans having access to large swathes of data at all times. If I use a digital camera, I could upload my photos offline, and process them and then save on an external device or print and delete. Photos that my wife supposedly 'delted' off her old phone can be accessed through the cloud.
It’s never coming back, is it?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width409Image Height518Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4305385yeah I heard that's what they were doing with it, and my hope is whatever contractual obligations that fuji has with ilford is dissolved when they inevitably cancel it, because so far I can't see anything in ilfords lineup that can do 2+ minutes of exposure without compensation (I liked using it for long exposures)
>>4305409why would they discontinue something they don't make? it's basically free money now, no work to make it and they can sell it at a premium due to brand recognitioncorporate equivalent of amazon dropshippers
>>4305409>I liked using it for long exposuressounds interesting. mind posting something?
bough two packs for my rz67 last year, still haven't found the right special occasion to shoot it
>>4303677>m43 have better resolutionno matter how hard you shill your poor man micro 4 sharts i will never buy it even for free.
Sigma mogging Canon, Nikon, and Sony with a 500mm f/5.6 lens that looks great with the Snoy a1 (50mp). Yeah, it won't look very goos with the 2x teleconverter on 60mp Leicas, but this lens will rape the used market.>native to mirrorless>lighter than nearly everyone>lose only 1 stop, and macro>holds up to everything <$6.5k usedwhy the fuck would you buy a used tele, for birds and wildlife anymore? No fucking reason.SELL NIKON MIRRORLESS BODIESSELL CANON MIRRORLESS BODIESHURRY!!!! THEY ARE WORTHLESS NOW!!!![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwarePaintShop Pro 25.00Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern1128Focal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3884Image Height2184Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 16:55:17Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating900Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width970Image Height545RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4301779m8, that obsession isn't healthynobody mentioned that lens but you
>>4301780cooe
>5 minutes for the shittiest comeback in history>so mad he can't even type a single word correctly
>so mad he's counting minutes between replies and hyper-analyzing typosit seems whether its panasonic, sigma, or olympus, when someone is shilling shitty gear on /p/ they quickly sink to the slimiest depths of delusion and pettiness
>>4301302>500mmtoo bad it's not far enoughyou need 600mm minimum >teleconverters same quality as cropping
Do any of you guys take pics of toys, figures, model trains, dioramas, or anything of that sort? it's something I've been wanting to try my hand at.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern846Focal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:16 14:47:48Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCool White FluorescentFlashNo FlashFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306481i learn am fast learner when it comes to stuff i like to do pretty much.hope i learn more in general from experience and lurking
>>4306481>>4306481>i do remember i kept it fastare you sure?exif on the photo you posted says 1/5sit's basically impossible for a human to hold still enough to get a sharp photo with thatclassic rule of thumb is 1 / focal length or faster
>>4306485no i dont even own a tripod.I tucked my arms in and put them on my table when i needed to.Ive been meaning to buy a tripod for a little bit. not saying that none if my photos came out bluryi culled the ones that didnt look goodand that would explain any blur that you can see
>>4306485>classic rule of thumb is 1 / focal length or fasteralso thank you againi will start doing this
>>4306447I wish that I could take my dolls outside for photoshoot like this... But I don't want to be jailed or beaten.Such is the third world life.
been thinking for awhile about maybe opening up my own Used Cameras Shop but not entirely sure where to start or what I need to do in order to get it off the ground and not just be an idea but a plan I can get into action with
>>4296128im not... >:(
coffee shop in the front, camera shop in the backmake it as trendy and histery as possible because that's the type of audience that even uses and is willing to by cameras these days. make it a local thing by having competitions and seminars and things like thatdown side: gays, pretentious hipsters, and uni fags
>>4295219yo
>>4295458>3.25%
>>4295224this but also make tiktok slop glorifying the shit out of the cameras you have in-stock. also look into shipping capabilities so its not just a local shithole only type of place.
Let's see some cars and bikes.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:04 04:55:49Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/4.5Brightness8.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1365RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID844286f49e2d04330000000000000000
>>4305915hey you know what you're out taking photos and I'm not so whatever. I don't think it's that bad. I've absolutely seen worse.
>>4306007don't beat yourself up, go out and shoot too!and thank you all for the feedbacksI'm not a cars guy (neither in knowledge nor in photos) but sometimes they're truly beautiful to shoot. I gotta get more familiar with it, though>not sure if picrel fits in the thread, but it's a vehicle photo and I love it so fuck it
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2326Image Height1550
>>4306314gay and microdick-pilled
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:22 00:21:43Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/6.3Brightness6.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCloudy WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?>artemis mission back to the moon >using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width750Image Height750Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4305973Several hundred pounds of moon rocks disagree.
>>4305973The LRO took pictures of the landing sitesPictures were taken by hand on the moonAnd now a z9’s going to the moon so cONTROLLED oPPOSITION will say, nonsensically, it was AI generated because it wasnt a canon 5d (a canon 5d would die halfway through the trip lol)
>>4306240I wouldn't believe that bullshit even if it were taken with a reflex. Because what NASA shows and what they label it as matters a lot more. AI in mirrorless is a concern because it can replace what people would see with an optical device. NASA didn't need AI to fake the moon landing, just a studio and some actors willing to play the part.
>>4306251The evidence is overwhelming. The skepticism has been debunked so many times that you need to believe in AI live editing EVFs to keep up the denial.Russians, due to being low IQ homosexuals, lost the space race. And Nikon was always better than canon
>>4306251congratulations, you're the ultimate retard
Why do old photographs looks so crystal sharp? Is it because of the giant glass negatives?
>>4297371>Is it because of the giant glass negatives?probably. Those large formats had to have a megapixel equivalent of like over 100. it's amazing they were able to make sharp lenses.
>>4302678>calling someone else a turbo sperg when you're the one unable to read contextual cues like the date something is published, or the shift in tone between a recommendation to a mug punter and an actual technical analysis, which he frequently gives both of, or between a statement of opinion vs fact, comparison vs absolutism, etc.
>>4300665Look under Ryan Rockwell's page.
wheres all yalls bmws at 16. gotta feed that growing senpai nigga
>>4306416>believability of ken being a millionaire from selling condos goes up 100%Wow, these iphones are amazingI can hardly tell it from his canon R5
I have an old jpeg thats corrupted that im trying to open. The last 6 apps i've tried display the pic, but either output it as a tiny thumbnail, or heavily watermark the image to the point of ruining it. Does anyone know of an app that's free that is actually free to fix busted jpegs? Thanks, anons
r-photo is one of the better free options most free options in this category kinda suck
>>4304405unless I'm retarded, that appears to be an app to recover deleted stuff. I'm looking for something that fix's jpegs that are corrupted, not deleted. That, or I'm too stupid to use it properly???
>>4304711>I'm too stupidyesalso>>>/g/
>>4304773I debated that before posting, but it seems like the photog anons should have some experience in this realm. Besides, /g/ is too broad. If you guys can't come back with anything, I'll try over there...
>>4304711gimp?>open image>click save as
