[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

You're welcome: https://natashagudermane.com/press/press/
11 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294365
>canon is nikon company man Ken Rockwell
It makes too much sense. His poor children.
>>
>>4294362
It's not about it being color, it's about the whole photograph being a lame excuse to show a nude woman
>>4294365
>>4294431
Just absurd, also Ken unironically cheered on EVIL cameras since their inception. He really liked the a77.
>>4294380
Feminist shock commentary that relies on coomers to gain any semblance of relevancy.
>>
>>4294359
Greetings from Bavaria.
>>
File: Katie_Rockwell.png (1.33 MB, 668x951)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB PNG
>>4294431
>His poor children
What makes you say that?
Katie's been looking thick.
>>
>>4294973
Get this girl to a dietician asap
>looking away
Even katie knows mirrorless and digislug photo spam is cringe. She’ll probably grow up to be a patrician film leica shooter.

File: f_IMG_0283.jpg (808 KB, 1353x2706)
808 KB
808 KB JPG
young Felix edition
198 replies and 149 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMGP0770.jpg (368 KB, 1024x768)
368 KB
368 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX Optio Z10
Camera SoftwareOptio Z10 Ver 1.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:01:15 14:42:53
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/7.0
ISO Speed Rating80
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1024
Image Height768
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
>>4251672
Shitty ccd clouds are kino man I wanna get a few mins worth and speed it up

Beautiful
>>4252946
>>4257681
>>4277039
>>4283710
>>4284207
>>4292302
Beautiful and aligned with the sovl
>>4254923
>>4255299
>>4257070
>>4258143

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>4251672
what is going on with the left side of the shot? It's distorted? Is this a tilt-shift lens?
>>
What digishit camera is considered the most kino now? What is the fom?
>>
>>4294928
Which ever one you have senpai

File: DSCF07384000px.jpg (2.72 MB, 4000x2829)
2.72 MB
2.72 MB JPG
Hey people, I've finally gone around to sort the pictures from my previous trip in order to bring the total amount down. (gone down from some 300 pictures to a nice 69)

Thus, time to make a thread here!

These were taken in August of 2023, over a span of two weeks.

Our itinerary was the following:

- Tokyo
- Kanazawa
- Kobe (Himeji, Akashi)
- Hiroshima (Miyajima, Okayama on the way)
- Nagoya
- Tokyo again, two nights and a day.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
205 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4289785
Thanks man

>>4289912
Thank you!
I'm glad you enjoyed the photos and the comments

I'd say I also mainly shoot for sentimental value, but it did take me some time before I started shooting more during trips; I went to Prague when I was like 16/17 with my first DSLR camera and I barely shot anything at all, I felt dead inside when I noticed c':

If you've got a thread floating around or are planning to make one I'll try and take a look if you tag it here
>>
>>4246313
I miss Japan
>>
>>4294478
I've been thinking about it a lot this past week, especially Kanazawa though, really want to go back to spend a longer time there!
>>
Op can you explain again why you use iso 1000 in daylight? I saw your post in some other thread but I can't find it anymore.
>>
>>4294478
>>4246297 Goddamn this thread is getting OLD

>>4294680
Doesn't hurt to post the text here again:

>>>4275809
"I like to stick my ISO on a fixed number, that way I can easily imagine what my shutter speed and aperture will do to the scene (and with practice, you can even go full manual and not look at the meter)

800 ISO is the perfect all around speed in my experience, it gets you good results in normal shadow and is still very useable in daylight, even on a bright day
But with this sensor, 1000 actually has less noise :)
So it's free exposure

TL:DR : There's no reason not to with the X-Trans 3


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: images (18) (17).jpg (34 KB, 739x415)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>every photography youtuber says gear doesn't matter
>they all use leicas
>or expensive medium format cameras
>all while they have tons of cameras and have sponsors to pay for more gear
Are there any legitimate photography youtubers? At least Chris and Jordan are a proper gear review channel and don't lie about it.
140 replies and 21 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4293364
gear matters differently depending on what you are doing. explaining where it does and does not matter is a waste of time so it's safer to tell people that gear doesn't matter as you coincidentally put all your old, disliked gear on ebay at the exact moment you are finalizing a review video where you dishonestly claim that you love it and it's packed full of soul and filmic character
>>
GrainyDays is the only good phototuber.
>>
>>4294538
Grainydays is the archetype of all of this faggotry, more like. I hate him almost more than I hate women.
>>
>>4294866
yep. he is especially a fag.
>>
>>4294538
Grainydays is worse than deep fried tampons

What do you guys think about APS-H? I just picked up a camera which uses it.
>about 50% more surface area than APS-C
>enables faster readout times than full frame
>larger photo-sites than a similar megapixel full frame
>better dynamic range than APS-C
>lots of APS-C lenses' image circle will cover an APS-H sensor
The only downside is needing to check the lenses yourself to ensure compatibility. It is truly the best of all worlds.
24 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294904
That's exactly what I mean. It seems obvious but over the years people have been taught a lot of stuff that is simply incorrect, like crop factor being "magnification" so they become confused by this stuff.
>>
>>4294905
But that doesn't hold up with the a7riv and the 90d. The a7riv has a 61mp sensor. 61/1.5 = 40.667MP. The 90D is 32.5MP. the APS-C area of the Sony has more megapixels. Did you mean the a7riii?
>>
>>4294907
Canon is 1.6x, also you're dividing an area quantity by a linear one. 61MP/1.6/1.6 is 23.82, which gives you roughly the 80D (unsurprising given that they have almost the same pixel size).
>>
>>4294920
>you're dividing an area quantity by a linear one. 61MP/1.6/1.6
I'll have to think about this, I'm not sure this setup is correct. Because we're not trying to figure out the new area, we're just interested in the number of pixels that remains. If Canon's crop is 1.6. That means the sensor is 60% smaller or 40% of the area of FF. So you would only need to reduce the number of MP by 60%, not 60% twice. If you wanted to caluclate the dimensions of the sensor, you would reduce both the width and length by that amount.
>>
>>4294922
That's how it works. MFT has a crop factor of 2 because the linear dimensions are approx half of FF (discounting aspect ratio differences). I.e. you could fit 2 MFT lengths on a FF length and ditto for height. With that in mind, if you overlay a MFT sensor on a FF sensor, you realize that you could fit 4 MFT sensors on a FF sensor.

New year new whining edition

All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY -https://textbin.net/evqhpcl2jy
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>4252244

Quick FAQS

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
309 replies and 48 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1689716529893349.png (30 KB, 1035x477)
30 KB
30 KB PNG
>>4294656
>fuckhuge asian market
>RED
LMAO. RED has fuck all support outside of the US since they've been cutting headcount due to low marketshare. Imagine thinking US-based company with only 200 employees could do jack shit in Asia.
https://www.nikon.com/company/news/2024/0307_01.html
>>
>>4294654
Filmchads win again, the joy of reflex brings you the movies. Let's hear the digislug cope.
>>
File: 1707454939908959.jpg (129 KB, 1920x823)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>4294659
because sony actually listens to their users and innovated in the cine space (similar to RED a decade+ ago)
>need to put the cam in a tight spot? fine we'll make a sensor + mount extension
>need a cheap but still high quality crash cam? fine, buy a dozen FX3s
>Raw files too big and RED patentwhoring? fine, choose what compression you want with X-OCN
>>
>>4294654
>Implying nikon is going to make cinema cameras
They'll do a panasonic, and just move the tech to stills cameras and half ass a few "serious" projects because the market is oversaturated with billionaire gear. Due to movies that the (((AMPAS))) likes mostly being made by their fellow (((billionaires))).

They were probably thinking of less sony dependence and buying global shutter instead of waiting for sony to let them have it
>inb4 sony shill: sony semiconductor and sony consumer imaging DO NOT COMMUNICATE SER! THEY DO NOT!
>>
Bump limit reached, new thread
>>4294741
>>4294741

This is the Film General Thread, aka /fgt/
Please post your film photos in this thread. It's ok to post about gear in this thread.
>it's not gay to post in the /fgt/, unless you tripfag

Previous Thread >>4291245

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 22.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:01:19 18:15:20
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1180
Image Height660
317 replies and 92 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294691
based soviet shit camera
>>
new thread >>4294697
>>
>>4294727
>shit camera
Retard
>>
>>4294587
>faded looking
intentional
>I think the people make the image feel cluttered
the people are the subject
>Consider taking a similar shot with a business man walking towards you
bad idea
>>
>>4295100
Lol.

The first known photograph of a little girl

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerTodd-White Art Photography
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
33 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
bump
>>
Test
>>
>>4283254
Maybe it worked. Maybe it didn't.
>>
I'm starting to think you're all very invested in this thread surviving
>>
>>4288261
Yes

File: IMG_20240308_110237.jpg (3.32 MB, 4080x3072)
3.32 MB
3.32 MB JPG
It seems to me that connections are more important than the work, the context itself.
During my exhibition noone really came. The opening was crowded but everytime i come here and wait for people noone actually visiting it.
Any other selfcentered female art student with selfies of her body fat, armpits, funky looking overall jumpsuit with political messages written on a dildo and glued on her forehead gets more spectators.
Makes me really sad. Started in february 7 and it will end tomorrow and i haven't seen anyone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model2201117TY
Equipment MakeXiaomi
Sensing MethodUnknown
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4080
Image Height3072
Image Created2024:03:08 11:02:38
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
ISO Speed Rating102
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure Time1/50 sec
Focal Length4.25 mm
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Light SourceD65
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure Bias0 EV
Image Height3072
White BalanceAuto
Brightness0 EV
Image Width4080
Exposure ModeAuto
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Color Space InformationsRGB
149 replies and 18 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294506
>I'm trying to get some of my work shown in galleries and no one actually answers.
To my understanding most gallerys (private ones) either prefer painting/drawing/illustrations more. Some do exhibit photographs too
public gallerys prefer "projects" not just photographs (even if they're really good)
You have to come up with a project and present it that way maybe.
Or atleast make a topic and select the photos that fits that title and pass it to them to see.
Most public gallerys here are about nepotism, if you're female, babble some political nonsens, then you're in.
This gallery i was in is in a small town next to where i live. They want a balanced program since it's really a small town. They exhibit traditional artist (the red haired woman with mediocore paintings to artists with high profiles or a young group of people with their comic drawings whatever.
They give photography twice a year a spot and rest are painting drawing illus etc.
So when i applied they checked the photos and were actually very amazed.
Iam telling you, if i took Ansel Adam prints to any public gallery they would reject me
because nobody looks at the work but who you are, what ideology, is there queer politics included ?, what circles are you from.
You have to have luck my friend. Try doing a Project, you'll have more chances by that !
add some research or pretend that you actually researched. add some other sources etc so the gallery can do something with it, not just good looking interesting photographs
>>
>>4294544
So you’re saying they were amazed you’re brown and photographed brown people, which is why you got into the gallery?

Light the gallery on fire next time. Yours truly, whites, asians, and the jews that werent born into privilege (i work at a fucking bagel shop).
>>
>>4294544
When you say "projects" i guess you mean a sort of long time plan, like "i will do only this for ten years" or so like exploring a topic.
I get that somehow. My pictures and the text that i sent it with were in that idea, at least very specific in its kind. I guess i did not say how long term it would be but yeah...

You talk about luck, but what you're really saying is that luck doesn't matter if you deal with politics or an ideology.
I can have my own opinion about it, but if it's basically like that, i'll have to play the game.
>>
>>4292264
well, you need to have at least some PR, it's physically impossible to know that you are having an exhibition, that's when the context starts to play
>>
>>4294552
yesss whatever this anon said !
but unfortunately iam not brown at all, wish i had more tan.
>>4294564
it doesn't have to be a long term project at all. just grab a topic maybe, don't understimate
photography. just grab a series of photographs from your archive and title them as if you meant to do that. I never applied a project either desu.
Go take portraits of working people maybe.
>politics or an ideology
some people so it seems to me atleast, especially those with no talents at all
just throw political messages around and it's called art, contemporary arts.
I guess gallerys and art institutions etc want to see some topics, actions, reports so they can
brag by exhibiting it probably not just fine arts...museums are for fine arts

File: R0008017.jpg (2.49 MB, 1800x1440)
2.49 MB
2.49 MB JPG
been a long time guys, having a kid and a fucking meth-head crazy dog AND being an arborist climbing trees year-round doesn't give me much time to shoot anymore. Other than the 3 or 4 opportunities I'm given to go shoot, i just don't really want to anymore.

This will probably be the last time i post here, some of these are new, taken with my trusty old Ricoh Gr i got way back in 2015 (which i never ONCE dealt with the *dust* issue), some with my Nikon d750, and a few from my Samsung S10/Google Pixel 7 phones.

A lot of these are going to be old files I've either re-edited, or old RAWs i never got around to touching, and just recently gave them my best shot. I will also add a few photos i think are my absolute best (i will label them as such), feel free to shit on as many of them as hard as you want, ill bite the pillow and take it dry.

Anyways, its been a great 10 years on this god forbidden board, and even though gear faggotry never slowed (in fact, it got worse, thanks Sony) you guys were the ones that taught me everything i know. From taking and giving criticism, to techniques and genuinely great advice, i got it from here (i still miss Bass). Thanks guys, its been fun.

Anyways, feel free to post any old or recent lowlight/night shots you've taken. It doesn't have to be recent either, post night shots from years ago that you're the most proud of, id love to see.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3987
Image Height3190
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:02:22 20:03:16
Exposure Time8 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness-6.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1800
Image Height1440
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
182 replies and 111 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4292422
>vhs insert sound
>cassette tape insert sound
>massive vocal fry
>paradoxical set up where you pretend you're just some average poor guy but have studio lighting and an entire staff
>portra 400
>>
File: Susu Laroche.jpg (237 KB, 1315x1962)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
>>4292422
i never cared much for film personally, the only person i know doing really neat things with it is Susu Laroche

>pic Related

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerTrevor Fulton
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: HDR toilet paper.jpg (2.03 MB, 1598x1198)
2.03 MB
2.03 MB JPG
i also wanna share the worst photo i ever took

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeGoPro
Camera ModelHero3-Black Edition
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)15 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:04:05 14:23:59
Exposure Time5/1199 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating146
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject DistanceUnknown
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash Function
Focal Length2.77 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1598
Image Height1198
Exposure Index0
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4292485
I hate grainydays so much its unreal
>>
>>4293839
I like it

Celeb photography thread, also Lana del Rey got bogged so hard it's unreal
>>
>>4294441
what she eating yo? she was so fucking hot when she ate only heroin or whatever. now she's not even one of those hot(fetish) chubbies. sad.

File: ppp_Template_Post_Em_Me.jpg (1.12 MB, 2183x4409)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB JPG
It's about that time again peeps!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:03:08 11:55:18
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2183
Image Height4409
28 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: sourceforthatclaim.jpg (232 KB, 1277x1500)
232 KB
232 KB JPG
>>
>>4294098
Only deserving reply for such a shit thread, kek
>>
>>4294098
There is nothing wrong with BPM 1/8. I unironically use them to protect my lenses instead of UV filters
>>
>>4294342
I want to say some mean things. But I’ll refrain from calling you a fucking retard.
>>
>>4294330
based lesbian photographer enjoyer

File: 1685301637063783.png (33 KB, 1229x1160)
33 KB
33 KB PNG
312 replies and 35 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294283
Either trolling or brain rot.
Ken Rockwell even supports EVIL cameras and the lunar hoax (doesn't surprise me that the two go together)
>>4294299
>whenever cANON is banned cinefag also disappears (and vise versa)
>when they are online, it's always at the same hours or close enough that they must live in the same timezone
Demonstrably false. Sometimes we coincide but it's far from always. Also cinefag has posted when I was banned.
>>
I shoop camera size comparison photos and no one calls me out on it. At worst anons blame the website for being inaccurate.
>>
>>4294369
Practice your reading comprehension skills ESL
>>
I shit on the x100 series constantly but one of my favorite instagram bros uses the x100v exclusively and he gets some really nice shots out of it.
>>
File: IMGP7891.jpg (1.21 MB, 1920x2400)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>4292774
looks good to me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-1
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:03:16 22:03:09
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height2400
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeDistant View

I just saw down bellow, that there was an attempt, but thread derailed to the political bullshit because of terrible OP's views. I'll try to become a new OP and remember: no politics or you can eat a giant bag of dicks.

I admire East Block lenses in general and some of their cameras for years and a former photo gear collection fan (bulked everything and now think that your gear is a tool and if you don't shoot you don't need it). Ask me everything.

My current gear consist heavly with Jupiter series: Jupiters 8, 9, 21M and also Mir-1. Don't you ever buy a Jupiter-3 if you don't want to drown in soap.
55 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4292193
thanks anon

why a leningrad over a praktika, pentax, or the kiev 88? the praktika kind of appeals to me because it wont break and is reliable, looks like 4-5k on avito, the pentax bc ppl say its a better camera and will work with soviet glass, and the kiev 88 because medium format would be cool to fuck around with, plus the odd form factor of the camera
>>
>>4293131
Tы зaбывaeшь чтo пpaктики oчeнь чacтo юзaли бoмбилы, и y них мoжeт быть тyпo выpaбoтaн pecypc зaтвopa. Лeнингpaд дo yжaca кaпpизный, 88 я бы дoвepил тoлькo дeдaм кoтopыe eщё пpи coвeтaх их чинили, и тo нe вceм
Пo фaктy oптимaльный вapиaнт-пeнь либo Киeв+любoй cф Киeв, нo пocлe CLA нe caмoyчкoй
TL;DR don't buy a praktica it's most likely mechanucally fucked
>>
File: praktica-wlf.jpg (825 KB, 4032x3024)
825 KB
825 KB JPG
Recently got a Praktica "F.X3"
While my logical brain knows that waist level finders make no sense on a 35mm and every digital camera ever has a "live preview" my monkey brain is dazzled by the magic mirror box every single time I open it.
The Primoplan 50mm 3.5 that came with it is kind of underwhelming though. The fact that it is so dim is ironic when the camera's party piece depends heavily on how much light gets in.
>>
>>4294336
The above pic was basically the moment I unboxed it after slapping a faster lens on it, I thoroughly wiped it down since then.
>>
>>4294336
>my monkey brain is dazzled by the magic mirror box every single time I open it.
You mean, by the Joy Of Reflex(TM)

File: 500px2.jpg (80 KB, 876x880)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
Just realized that people who don't have an account on 500px get to see this annoying thing which can't even be closed.

Been using 500px for my portfolio since 2012 and need an alternative. What do you guys use?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerAbdullah Mahmud
Image-Specific Properties:
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
"Continue using an email" is the usual shit, just because they have botnetted options with more convenience, doesn't mean they're bad
>>
>>4293388
they're not but I shoot concerts and message several bands/singers per week who probably don't have the nerve to register on 500px just to see my shitty photos
>>
>>4293380
>500px
use flickr, it's superior in every way imaginable
>>
>>4294253
>flickr
>superior
>in every way imaginable
>>
>>4293380
flickr


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.