Been selling digishitters to zoomers as a side hustle. Recently got a request to take photos with a Casio from 2005 because a potential buyer wanted to see how it looked.Outside I went, took some photos of scenery, flowers and whatnot. Went inside, noticed that I had used a low quality setting, went outside again to redo it in high quality setting, sent the photos to the potential buyer, gets feedback the next day that the photos "were of a too high quality and didn't look vintage enough". So it made me wonder, perhaps I should have just sent the low quality photos right away and that would have generated a sale, but still.. How does a camera that didn't even get good reviews when it was new in 2005 look "too good?"
>>4337918I got this out of a Kyocera S3L literally 21 years ago... I still can't really believe either the quality or that it was 21 years ago!
>>4337923Also this
>>4329435Zoomer here, i bought a cybershot WSC-1 bc looks great and a friend of my gf have his pocket camera and looks nice, the problem was the fucking original old memory stick but i'm waiting the adapter from amazon
>>4337973Yup, memory stick duo and those old fujifilm/olympus XD cards are probably the cause of much zoomer distress.
>>4329435>vintage lookIt's basically what you (can) get with foveon
Do zoomers care about CCD videography? I have some old VHS video cameras I restored that have 1/2" CCD sensors inside and they look great if you bypass the tape and export the raw video right to a capture card.I've been trying to market myself to zoomers who want the VHS effect but nobody is biting .
>>4314064Spoopy.
>>4333352>>4333299I don't think most zoomers have the patience, I record on tape and convert the tape to digital via an analog to digital converter, from there i pass the recording off by cloud storage with link in email or unlisted YouTube for them to use a YouTube downloader to rip it. biggest gripe I have is re-recording because you have to replay the video in live time to convert it, and pray the tape or cam doesn't crap out. main selling point is, "you could use and app or editor but the effects are authentic and irreplaceable" . Most zoombies can't sit still for 2 hours watching a tape record let alone 7 seconds.I don't sell my tapes (to hard to find) Its a labor of love that's why I do it.
bumpin
>>4314071That's very Jeanne Dielman
>>4337931how so?
Should I wait for WG-8 or get TG-7 right now?
>>4335650Thanks chatgpt!
>>4334595Both are tough small sensor P&S cameras which means compromise for convenience. Get the one you need when you need it. If you can wait, maybe you do not need either one. I myself have AW-100 and it has not aged well. Still, no regrets.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelCOOLPIX AW100Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.12Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:08 19:13:53Exposure Time1 secF-Numberf/3.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant ViewAltitude0.00 mTime (UTC)Color ModeCOLORFocus ModeAF-SISO SelectionAUTOImage AdjustmentAUTONoise ReductionOFFImage QualityFINESaturationNormalImage SharpeningAUTOWhite BalanceSUNNYAuto FocusCenter
Wow. This board is dead as fuck.
>>4336157Sorry?
>>4334595They're both the exact same camera that each company has been making for at least a decade now. Don't buy either, buy an older secondhand version of whichever you prefer.Most people using these professionally prefer the Olympus, its macro function is incredible, and it has a range of functional accessories should you require actual flashes, etc.Get a TG4, 5 or 6. Literally same sensor, lense, etc.
Even Panasoynic doesn't want to use their own cameras. Embarrassing.
>>4337813It must have been broken, which is common for anything made by panasonic. Random models have shutter/ibis/port/circuit board failures. Even the TVs don't stay functional. It's a joke.
>>4337838>P-panasonic sodomized my cat!
>>4337838>common for anything made by panasonicTrue dat. I posted about this on a normie photo board and someone else said they had the same experience. Defective or normal? Can't say. It's shit,either way.
>>4337849Panasonic is like sony. They make junk. If you give them enough money your junk will have some pointless premium feature and last a whole five years. But it’s junk all the same.
>>4337849Anusonic can't even make a functioning microwave let alone a camera>S series cameras sucking down their batteries while sitting idle
Here are some photos I've taken using a Canon Powershot ELPH 180. These are mostly taken in Westmount, Montreal and near Quebec City.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
And this is the last one. Hope you enjoy at least a few of them.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
in the Hi-Fi world we know lot's of brands that most people never hear about and yet they are the often the best, are there any of those in camera making?
>>4337640>staxyou mean heritage brand bought by the chinks? Leica is the closest I guess.
>>4337640How much do you want to branch out? Strictly camera and lens or we including accessories too? Cause I can think of tripod companies like RRS that normies wouldn’t know
>>4337640Yeah Stax is the Hassleblad of Audio, sureBut who's the Phase One though of audio? Focal?
>>4337640>great decades ago>bought out by chinahasselblad
>>4337767Who is the SuSE of photography?
do you guys even like photographing?
>>4337543Did you get the new pentacks anon? Saw one in stock at my local shop, it was tempting
>>4337537Im built for heat, its the cold that gets me so ive got the opposite problem lol
Today was a good day, i finished my roll and had a lovely walk in the woods.I'll develop and post pics somewhere else later today.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid KB2003_13.1.0.582(EX01)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height805Unique Image IDe44bebf7-c225-421d-aa3e-144d3ad3d83e
>>4336835No I just like LARPing as a photographer traveling in 3rd world countries taking pictures of people with gear worth more than their entire village
>>4336835Yes I do. I love that I can now look back through all my memories. I love that I now have prints on my walls that I can be proud of.I love my camera and I love photography.
Post flower photos please i like them[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern842Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:02:24 18:31:14Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias-1.7 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark IILens Size8.80 - 44.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 12:35:04Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityLens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length8.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeClose-Up (Macro Mode)Metering ModeCenter-WeightedISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalDigital Zoomx2.0Shooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeUnknownDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation5Sensor ISO Speed172Color Matrix35
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R8Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 18:43:52Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R8Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 18:45:54Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4321479>Post flower photos pleaseCornflower, south Washington state[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTDCamera ModelC730UZCamera Softwarev556u-78Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2009:05:16 09:27:55Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalCompression SettingHQMacro ModeUnknown
Besides the obvious like applying a film-preset (which looks terrible and not like film 100% of the time), messing with black levels and applying grain, what's missing for it to get the softness, colors and "feel" of film?
>>4336761you don't, because the anon talking about color grading seems to think still photos is like video and has a similar workflow. he is very confused. He saw a guy talking about RGB values in a node based color correction software and thinks anyone not doing that isn't properly "color grading" (editing).
>>4336761he doesn't realize that still photos have a graded look as soon as the camera color profile is added to the RAW and that "color grading" is only necessary when you're editing LOG video shot in a different color space.
For colour: You need to not clip the highlights and the digital solution of blending is not suitable for every style of photography and is tedious even with burst.also >>4335909 has a bit of a point but is going too far into overwank territory that balancing is important and just about everyone doing scans themselves are failing on it: but so are the cheap machines dumping them out without multiple passes. Even getting acceptable scans out of a pakon is an exercise in misery.
I just tested Dehancer, it works pretty well. Thanks to the anon who mentioned it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GX9Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:07:14 21:05:28Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4335893>Besides the obviousHave you factored the technology of transferring the analog image to digital? I'm not sure how you can compare what you see on-screen to what you see on paper unless you convert one or the other to enable true side-by-side.
looking at this comparison video of dslr and mirrorless cuz i'm looking into what to buy. and honestly the DSLR just looks better. like, with the mirrorless it doesn't look real. it's as if they turned up the color saturation way too high. to me, the DSLR seems to capture a more realistic/authentic photo of real life.this is the vid i'm talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC3Z_73m6G0maybe it's just the particular cameras he compared? and it has more to do with the brand/model (canon vs sony)
electronic shutter changes how bokeh looks. also everyone just uses presets
Are those.... colors?!?!aaaaah save me canonman I'm going insane
>>4336878Anon you are trying to impress anons on an image board from 2005, no need to do that.
>>4335748This/thread
>>4335568>maybe it's just the particular cameras he compared?Very likely. Some cameras you can also download pre-configured color balance settings to mimic different types of film. Results can very quite widely.
would be called the shitty rendering of a soft vintage lens if it was manufactured by any other company.
>>4334314A zionist like the other canidates?
>>4334314I agree anon.>Both heroes of the Jewish people (google Leica Freedom Train) B"H>Both have roots in Germany>Both attacked by coping poors that miss every shot they take at them>Both the reasonable choice to make this November
>>4334267poorfag cope. youre probably that idiot hating on Contax G series in the film gen
>>4337058>Both attacked by coping poors that miss every shot they take at themooof
>>4337059>muh japshiteven soviet shit was better
Just received my first camera (picrel). How do I (zoomer) use this?
>>4334219I agree only because that is a Ken Rockwell tier take on shutter speed
>>4334457Ken rockwell would say "you dont need fast shutters for sharp photos. just set your sharpness settings on your camera correctly and ask people to hold still, and all your photos will come out great. faster shutter speeds than 1/1000 are only for bird and sports photography."
>>4334218Idk, I chose picrel because film looks really good colorwise and it seems cheaper than solid digicams. I spent 80€ and will probably spend not more than 80€ on film and development a year. What’s the price for a decent beginner digital camera? 400-500€? No reason to go for that since I really like the look of film.
>>4334372but Canooon said these prints off the pro-100 are just as good as pigment prints off the pro-10.
>>4332637I’ve shot my first photo. I have no idea what the first ring on the lense does though. I just changed the shutter speed(?) until it stopped blinking at underexposed
• Theme: Wildlife• Deadline: From 7 July to 28 JulyTheme:• The submissions have to be of wildlife in it's natural environmentRules:• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.• Three entries per photographer max.• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.Optional:• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.• You may name your images if you wish.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4334787The vote results and the voting for challenge 61 are temporarily on hold since google locked me out of my account saying I need login using the wifi I used previously, which is a decent drive away. I'll see when I'll have the time to drive thereIf I can't log in even while using the old wifi, I'll restart the previous vote
Do insects count as wildlife?
>>4336444They doPretty much any animal that can be found in the wild counts. I even count fish, even though the FWS doesn't
>>4336649>fws>fish and wildlifewow never thought about thathuh
I have been a a Nikon D200 CHAD for the past year and a half but due to shear boredom and the screen being absolute dogshit I impulsively bought a Fujifag XT-3 because random people on the internet told me it was good, what am I in for? what lens should I get?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpcmVertical Resolution72 dpcmImage Created2018:09:04 13:42:59Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1800Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4336660Lenses
>>4336662I doesn't seem to be a common problem. A regular D2x with the latest firmware is nearly the same camera, but without this potential problem.
>>4336637>Fuji ergos are quite shit>switch to a camera that copied the design with even worse ergos.
>>4336501this and 35mm f1.4 and 23mm f1.4 or f2 if you're cheap. The pancake 27 is cool but super out of stock new and used.Alternatively the original kit lens with IS. I like primes more though.
>>4336175>I impulsively bought a Fujifag XT-3 because random people on the internet told me it was goodI wish I had money to throw around for no particular reason.
sure makes me appreciate modern high end lenses a lot, but at the same time it almost feels like cheating.
>>4337114Are you autistic, or just deciding to be unhelpful. Or is there an actual point there you'd like to explain?
I own many lenses. But my gotoo's are the exceptional long barrel Nikkor 35mm f2.8 Ai (with my Nikon D2x), and the unrivalled Nikkor 50mm f2 H.C. Auto/Ai.I also use a Nikkor 28mm f3.5 Ai-S, which is also a very good lens.When using my very portable Nikon FG, I use the second version of the Series E 50mm f1.8 (very good with lens hood) along with the aforementioned 28mm.
>>4337107>Is there any warningsHave the local witch-doctor check for possible curses attached to them, buy quartz-crystals and drink lots of water after noon.
>>4337516What if I take it to a local Dominos and have 'em slap it with a pepperoni
>>4328924That's a really beautiful photo
