[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

RIP Stephen Hawking 1942-2018 🙏

Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: art-local-preacher-02.jpg (107 KB, 1200x820)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
How does one achieve this style/look? Is it done in camera? Post? If anyone knows any good lessons on how to properly shoot/edit this it would be much appreciated
File: art-local-preacher-13.jpg (86 KB, 1200x800)
86 KB
Local Preacher
File: 819e05qxPEL._SL1500_.jpg (437 KB, 1500x1500)
437 KB
437 KB JPG
Shot by Nabil
Start by getting good
These were shot under blacklight with some bodypaint (the boob in the first one, the stripe/lips in the second). I'm guessing the pink background in the first was a gelled flash on a white background behind the model.

File: 1455767513000_1225875.jpg (77 KB, 750x750)
77 KB
I've just got the money to spend on a Canon 80D for travel and some wedding photography, could I do any better in the same price bracket?
32 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
Best option for MFT is hanging yourself.
>implying micro four turds is a serious format
Such insecurity
No, it doesn't. You seem to be confusing it with some other lens.
I use this lens professionally

It's great

File: 5520308595_b5c33d243d_b.jpg (347 KB, 1024x673)
347 KB
347 KB JPG
Last one: >>3257255

Read the sticky first!
Post anything gear related, cameras, lenses, bags, tripods, other fashion accessories (clothing, fancy straps, Leica) etc...
Post your question here, instead of starting a new thread about which lens to buy or what are the best beginner cameras.

And don't forget, be polite!
307 replies and 39 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: Rei.jpg (280 KB, 1743x1307)
280 KB
280 KB JPG
We are (still!) not even at bump limit, dumbass.
It's 300 posts, isn't it?
Worst girl
File: bump-limit.png (117 KB, 1252x257)
117 KB
117 KB PNG
It's 310 replies, the count number changes to italic, and there's a note.

>tfw no Misako Q10

I want one.

Is it worth the $400?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareLightroom
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2018:03:18 22:48:19
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I like it. What is the original picture?
Making sure your picture is worth giving a shit about is an important step.
Replace the ugly mutt, holy crap it looks awful.
>Shit font
>Ugly subject
>Shitty expression on ugly subject
>Meaningless contextless fucking shit in a shit font
>No fading
>Double chin

Fuck off
make it on a photo of benis

File: yt_1200-vfl4C3T0K.png (17 KB, 1200x1200)
17 KB
Is the only way to become a successful or renowned art driven photographer in 2018 to open a YouTube channel? Why is it that e-celebs are the new Cartier-Bressons despite their work being on par or worse than the average Instagram art hoe?
>Is the only way to become a successful or renowned art driven photographer in 2018 to open a YouTube channel?
No, there're plenty other platforms and none are a necessity

>Why is it that e-celebs are the new Cartier-Bressons despite their work being on par or worse than the average Instagram art hoe?
You answered your own question- they're celebrity. People buy into celebrity status or follow and listens to someone based on their persona and reputation rather than their content and information, always will and always have

That, and the fact that YouTube and Netflix are two of the most widely watched forms of media on the planet mean obviously some people are going to become wildly successful by catering to audiences on those platforms

Perhaps you should stop asking lauded questions on imageboards and getting upset about how the world works and worry about taking better shots

What laptops do you use to edit and work on photography/video?

I already be have a good PC but would like to have something portable. I'll be filming be a documentary in another country soon. I would be like to avoid MemeMac if possible.
14 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Anything with IPS display, and you're good to go
Well, this is not a good quality TN :D
But he nails the colors most of the time, though.
Surface Pro 3. Frankly I cant go back to anything else other than newer models in the future. It makes too much of a difference. The portability, the performance, the pen utility. Its so comfy to use edit with the pen in any place. Also the display has a nice dynamic range, 2k resolution. A god sent. I also use it to draw. Its simply a portable, light sized studio.
15" 2015 MacBook Pro with 16gb, Retina, and PCIe SSD. The photo editor of the gods.
lol meme

why do i look so shit in selfies /p/? my face looks so long. please tell me its the shitty phone camera

would a professional shot make me look closer to my mirror image?
2 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>my face looks so long
Says the man with a perfectly square head.
File: 1521390407574.webm (873 KB, 408x720)
873 KB
this is why smartphone photographers are cancer
File: Screenshot_15.png (409 KB, 431x630)
409 KB
409 KB PNG
is he kill?
yeah for sure. you just watched someone die.

File: holga.jpg (156 KB, 1500x1000)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
general holga thread
54 replies and 18 images omitted. Click here to view.

Is Holga good!?!?
You know the word dimensionless but clearly don't understand what that means for determining units from an eqn
(We're on the same side, I'm just clarifying)
No. That's why it good.
What's the best Holgamods?

File: p how i spend my day.jpg (273 KB, 2560x1440)
273 KB
273 KB JPG

Bringing back this classic.
42 replies and 20 images omitted. Click here to view.
You also gotta look like that guy. I mean, just look at him - models en masse!
>he uses an ipad
That's the joke right?
fucking unbelievable
File: 4S6lAAm.jpg (254 KB, 1000x790)
254 KB
254 KB JPG

File: well b.jpg (616 KB, 2000x1333)
616 KB
616 KB JPG
So instagram images are just 1.2 megapixels? Why is /p/ such a fucking gear snob then? Are you fuckers really printing shit that is super big or some shit? Because even m43 looks totally fucking fine downsampled to 1080x1080. Hell I would be shocked if you could tell if something was full frame or m43 at a 1080x1080 down sampled image.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T1i
Camera SoftwareDigital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2011:11:03 15:17:17
Exposure Time1/400 sec
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4752
Image Height3168
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
3 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: m43 vs medium.jpg (2.63 MB, 3611x2405)
2.63 MB
2.63 MB JPG
>I would be shocked if you could tell if something was full frame or m43 at a 1080x1080 down sampled image

You tell me. But instagram is crap designed to make phoneshooters and kids feel good about themselves. I'd never in my life think of putting anything on it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:01:05 03:07:18
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3611
Image Height2405
>implying anyone would want to steal Creepshots by Chrosis™
>4chan hates (((Facebook)))
>4chan praises Instagram (aka Photo Facebook)
Totally makes sense
where is the implication that anyone praises it?

I don't even have an Instagram account, but if I were an aspiring photographer wishing to make a living out of this (or expand his opportunities), this would certainly be to my detriment - as much as I'd hate it.
What a pointlessly snobby comment. Tons of quality photographers that I follow have instagram accounts.

File: image.jpg (3.36 MB, 2476x2448)
3.36 MB
3.36 MB JPG
I’m thinking of getting a Samsung S9+ because of the camera and my old phones on the brink of death plus I can’t afford a mega expensive dslr.

Can anyone tell me why I shouldn’t buy the S9 for photography?

I would really love sharp pictures I heard on another thread megapixels don’t matter in sharpness the software does (the phone is dual 12mp) is that true?

Also if what do you guys recommend as a good dslr/bridge camera for a beginner that will take sharp photos

>inb4 reddit spacing

Image is photo I took on the phone camera I have.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2476
Image Height2448
Read the sticky
Also dslrs are reasonably priced, certainly more so than the s9
>megapixels don’t matter in sharpness the software does
wew, the absolute state of humanity. just get the s9. You don't want to be reasoned into what would be the best purchase for photography, nor do you want a second opinion on anything. You're just fishing for confirmation bias.

I'm sure you'll be able to take nice pictures with the s9, but you have almost no control. If you want the rdiculously expensive phone over what you'd call an 'expensive' dslr, it's fine, just get it, but don't lie to yourself.

File: fujifilm.jpg (29 KB, 600x600)
29 KB
I'm related to a corporate head at fuji so I can get a good discount on their stuff, but I haven't heard anything about them from anyone. Like sensor performance? And the lenses seem so expensive but are they good? Does anyone even know...?¿ (Looking at the new xh1)
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
My uncle works at Ninendo, and I have the same question about the Switch. Ultimately, nobody really knows anything, and you just shouldn't buy anything.
Yea, they do.
File: s5pro_front.jpg (225 KB, 1400x1092)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
they actually made the best dslr
nigga that's a nikon
>fuji will never make x100 with superCCD
why even ;_;

File: 20180228-79990014.jpg (906 KB, 995x1500)
906 KB
906 KB JPG
Botanical Edition

Old thread is about to hit the cutoff

>Olympus 35RC/Kodak 400TX

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2018:03:12 21:51:25
221 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
is this near neuhof?
Are these unprocessed raws?
his glasses look like perscriptions, probably just cant see well through the vf
DSLRs have diopter adjustment allowing you to use the viewfinder without glasses regardless of how shitty your eyesight is
No, just sooc jpegs

File: Untitled.png (2.33 MB, 1992x1073)
2.33 MB
2.33 MB PNG
What's the appeal of Leica products if they're impossible to repair, and Leica lenses if they're soft, and glow due to poor coating?
68 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
Leica doesn't make you take better photos, neither does an FTb, or a Sony, or any system
Some people like to use rangefinders.
Nobody cares about what you use except gearfags.

Both those claims are wrong. The softish lenses were the classic ones not the newer ones.

What baffles me is that nobody mentioned the quality of Leica's lenses. Even a 70 yo lens like the summicron 50mm outperforms the vast majority of lenses available on the market across all f/stops. And don't get me started on vintage japanese lenses...
>lens sharpness
Kill me.
File: petri_28.png (1.26 MB, 1005x717)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB PNG
Should I just buy one of these if I can't afford a leica but still want to become a pretentious hipster douche?

File: 8266262094_13ae4bf04e.jpg (124 KB, 500x356)
124 KB
124 KB JPG
You do own a Leica, right?
93 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
Why would you want to though. It's subpar compared to normal devs and unless you're really in the field with only film that needs to be developed/telefaxed stat (about 3 decades too late to larp that) the convenience factor is negligible :V
To me, developing film is relaxing, so I don't need my results that fast. However, that anon wrote he wanted to buy a bottle.
Mixing it myself defeats the purpose. If I’m mixing chemicals myself, I’ll just mix up regular developer and get better results.
Are you the one who wanted to buy R5?

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.