post some birds
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:16 17:58:56White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1440RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
Mute swan[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G11Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.10 - 30.50 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:03:15 22:48:51Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.50 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeSpotSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance5.550 mWhite BalanceDaylightExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Image Number162-2537
>>4295412His wife
powerful owl, largest owl in australia[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-G81Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)400 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:03:17 12:54:53Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4295570[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-G81Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)800 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:03:17 13:02:47Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
These would have gone in /fag/ but I took the meta thread to heart. Post B&W[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)225 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:04 18:14:14Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/7.1Brightness8.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length150.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
I am new to editing in black and white[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:03:16 11:10:34Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>>4294599[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmImage Width2853Image Height1898RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4295432[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1100Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmImage Width2012Image Height3024RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4292225best in thread
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1Focal Length (35mm Equiv)228 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:16 21:14:26White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating500Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length114.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1439RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceUnknownFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
New year, new birds
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:09 14:51:47White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias1.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2400Image Height1600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceUnknownFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:09 14:59:16White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2400Image Height1600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceUnknownFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
>>4292575>>4292597Ugh, I keep forgetting to include the metadata when I export stuff. It’s the same camera and lens as >>4292596 though
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:16 18:13:47White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1440RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
Downy woodpecker[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3089Image Height2048Scene Capture TypeStandard
>As Kosick remembers it, his subject wasn't too pleased at the time. "She was offended because I was in her personal space,"... "She made some comment about being too close to her boobs. So I took the photo, walked away, and never spoke to her again. I know they found her and got her to sign a release, though."
>>4294016If you are attractive you're going to be automatically funny.
deftones is so fucking mid
>>4295288Ohms is alright
>>4293620he got the shot who cares
>>4295288In a world where everything after the 80's is thrash, being mid is fine.
Can we have a thread for mocking other people's post editing, please?This one is the wallpaper someone at Microsoft chose for my lock screen today
>>4292752Looks good to me
>>4292767thanks[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)18 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:09 22:50:00White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height1499RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceUnknownFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
>>4288599Jesus how do I fix my scorched retinas??
>>4295322You don't, damage is cumulative. That's why a permanent UV filter lens is so important on helmets, even auto-darkening ones. It's not the flash itself that burns your retinas and leaves lasting damage but the UV in it.
>>4295353who was the 44th president of the US?
I've become friends and also the cameraman with an onlyfans girl, I mentioned I did film production in Uni and then got offered to help direct/film a scene and now I'm her go-to person for shooting. The thing is, I'm most comfortable with pre/post production, so despite sitting in classes for it due to various reasons I'm currently mediocre at lighting and camera setting stuff. Thankfully they all have some basic lights and microphones so I haven't had to invest money in, but if I can make a solid enough video in future I could make this a decent side gig, but my friend/client is ambitious and wanting to work up to "pornhub quality". Has any other anons ended up shooting amateur porn or photoshooting adult models and what gear should I be getting and how can I make up my production quality enough so I get hired by her friends. All I have personally is a canon 200d w/18-55mm lens and a tripid alongside a bounce kit, she has a Nikon Z 30 w/tripod and ring lights mostly.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1600Image Height2400Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2018:12:28 14:04:41Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1504Image Height2256
>>4293218>so the fact I'm not a creep like some nude photography types means I'm doing alright,there's nothing "creepy" about sleeping with consenting models you meet you prudish american
>>4293346I agree but I meant in the sense of being pestering with it.
>>4291722>hitting her goalsWhich were?
>>4254917>airbnb>homeownerThe odds of it actually being someone's home and not just a paralegal hotel these days are pretty much fuck all.
>>4293218Well, congratulations. But it looks like it could become your main gig.
>A Dispo lens is a 3D-printed body-cap with a recycled disposable camera lensThoughts? Any of you ever used one?
>>4292877>admitting to being a stormfag
>>4294255>the horror, how dare he not sell his race out to the eternal jew!!
>>4293318>my two trips I captured most images with my phonephones do not take pictures, they are for calling people. hope this helps
>>4292953135 is 35mm film400 is ISO. 27 is the DIN equivalent to 400 ISO.
>>4292772Fun for an experiment but the photos look like shit
Thoughts on the Hasselblad H3D series
>>4295211Have a look at that wiki (there are as well the sizes for the other models).https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasselblad#H3DBasically you have "small" sensors in ccd and cmos (similar to the Fuji GFX, Pentax 645Z and co.).Then in cmos you have only a big one (H6D 100), the biggest you can find on the market. You can find this same big size in CCD (H4D60 and H5D60) and then a slightly smaller one (1.1 factor I think).The slightly smaller sensor is the model you might want to look at (H3D39 and 50, H4D50, H5D50) because it is significantly bigger than the entry level model, but still close enough to the biggest model (hope it is clear).In CCD if money was no object I would go for either the H4D60 or H5D60 because they are the most sought after (image quality + a good pinch of CCD mythology) + they have true focus.And if I was stupid i would take the H6D100 because i don't believe there will be products like that anymore in the future.
>>4295239F5.6 and below is still really good quality wise (there's even a 100mm F 2.2 I never tried) but the sensors being bigger, in focus area is smaller or at least to keep in mind. Basically a shoulder/headshot with a 80mm at f5.6 with the focus on the eyes will result in a nose / ears already quite blurred. Or if the subject doesnt stare straight at the camera one of the eyes won't be sharp. I am not a big fan of that.I still believe that starting F8-F10 is where the system shines.
>>4294744do it that'd be cool
>>4295281they didn't have model with 80Mp ccd sensor?
>>4295300In House no, but there are Phase One backs adaptable to H Cameras. I just found that on the paper the idea makes the system even more complex and prone to failure. On top of that the back only is pretty expensive (6k euro these days)
Will bridge cameras ever make a return?I miss my P900 from way back in the day, the poor thing died years ago.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerLoganImage-Specific Properties:
>>4294757Superzooms like that are notorious for being soft at both ends, and slow, so you stop down and raise iso resulting in more softness etc. For wildlife you'll appreciate having lots of aperture and the ability to shoot sharp photos wide open. If you can afford it, try the Nikon D5500, a kit lens like the Nikkor 16-80 AF-S and the Nikkor 200-500mm AF-S instead. If you can't afford the 200-500, just get the body and 16-80 until you can. It's a shame to have bad cheap lenses lying around imo.
>>4290034bridge film cameras are actually a bit of a life hack and can mog point and shoot memes for everything except night photography where slr and a 1.4 lens are still important if u dont use flash
>>4294843>gluing a mediocre lens to a body>lifehackNo.
>>4294853Cope.
>>4294843ywn:>bridge camera>28-200mm lens>f2.8 or 3.5 instead of 4.5-5.6>~2+ stops of IS >loaded with Kodak 1600 speed color film
Maybe it's an idiotic idea, but has anyone tried to scan film with an inverted metallurgic microscope?Or a an upright materials microscope that uses incident light.Of course with an apochromatic low magnification objective and a proper mirrorless C-mounted.I know some people mounted microscope objectives on their cameras, but that's cumbersome.An inverted microscope would allow to micro-move the stage and fine adjust the DOF.Would that work?
>>4295204>For film you will want nonpolarized transmitted light.would that be optimal even with thick transparencies with a lot of underexposed areas?>>4295210>It's tediouswhy? how did you make film flat? Do you have an image to share that was scanned with that scope?
>>4295216Most FF Nikon DSLRs that I’m familiar with will have more stops of dynamic range in the lights, so I’d assume you could shoot raw and even if the light areas are blown out, you’ll still get a good scan
>>4295216Yeah, I just used a piece of glass. The microscope is called an epi-fluorescent microscope. It is designed to shine light on/look at the surfaces of shiny things like highly polished metals. It's an incredibly cool piece of kit to have around.>tediousWell, I had to take like 100 pictures individually to make this section of a 35mm shot. If you made a jig to keep the film square to your scope stage, and had a special stage movement that clicked for every 1mm or whatever you could do it a lot better, but I was just going by eye.My microscope has a lumenera infinity 2 digital sensor. It's only like 2 mp, but it's pretty good quality. New the damn thing is like 2k dollars for some reason...Having a microscope film scanning setup is incredibly overkill for scanning full images, but could be an invaluable tool when experimenting with different developers/recipes because you can zoom in 250x on the grain, and really compare different recipes or whatever. You can even measure the size of individual grains if you wanted.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4020Image Height6569Image OrientationTop, Left-HandLight SourceUnknown
>>4295220Maybe this is a dumb question, but why even bother? You're saying that image at full size is well over 100mp (obviously not 200mp, because of the overlap) yet even at the current resolution it seems excessive. Like you talk about being able to see individual grains but I see blur at that resolution. Maybe it's just because I haven't seen film at that high magnification so I don't know what I'm looking for. Could you post a 100% crop of something like the eye?
>>4295226It was just for fun. I was using the lowest magnification on my scope. Maybe later tonight ill take a high mag shot of a couple different films including cms20 so you can see. If you look around the darker areas of the background top left you can see individual grain. I was having trouble keeping the film perfectly parallel to the focal plane because I was using my phone as a light source, hah. The face area is a bit blurry.The negative is on very fine grained film also. If you look at something like foma 400, xx, or delta 400 you can very clearly see grain at that same magnification.
What I am for bros
>>4285135A worse experience than a garage sale polaroid and newly manufactured 600 film. Might as well buy one of those moto mods and a used moto z.
zink is very bad for photos, it's very small and quality is trashhowever, you can use it to print 2x3 stickers with anything else on them!
>>4286181They are kinda ok-ish if you print in b&w. If you want to ortho-larp and make credit card sized photos, you can work with it.
>>4285155>Why would you need to print a photo immediately?Only people without Autism can understand this irrational desire for this kind of plesure.
>>4285135Fun party gadget, not much more. I have a 140eur instax wide and 80eur inkjet printer that prints photos on photo paper, real printer is superior to instax to the point where comparing those two makes no sense. Regardless, it is a fun party gadget, people love getting their photos like that
Post pics taken with old digital cameras (2005 and older), im gonna post 3 i took today with my Fuji S2 Pro, i hate them because theyre cliché as fuck but hey theyre photos and i want an excuse to post em lmao[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePixS2ProCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)118 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:28 22:45:46Exposure Time1/90 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Brightness5.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceShadeFlashNo FlashFocal Length79.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4291104[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4291105[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Mavica FD87
>>4291105I feel like I know this place
>>4294950it's directly beside a few things, drop where you think if so. it'd give me a laugh if someone browsing here actually lived here.
Everything Polaroid. Cameras, film, polaroid now.Post your instant works.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1291Image Height1592Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:11:08 16:44:58Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1145Image Height1406
want a polaroid but is instax just cheaper and better?
>>4293588>>4293589>>4293590>>4293591These are extremely cool, how were they made?>>4294738Short answer: yes. Long answer: depends. Polaroid film is way more inconsistent (which might be acceptable or desirable if you're into it) and significantly more expensive, but it also has more area than instax square format; polaroid go film however is smaller as it has the same width as Instax mini, but 1:1 instead of 2:3. Polaroid cameras are all around better product than Instax, which has been re-releasing the same identical camera in a different shell for more than a decade now, recently removing features. It all comes down to what you want, what you need, and what you value.A note of caution: Polaroid spins its emulsion being inferior reverse engineered lost tech by valuing the imperfection of the end result, which truth be told I willfully bought into it as I think that if I wanted a perfect snapshit I could just use a smartphone and I'm happy with this choice, but I'm not expecting everyone to do the same, so beware of the marketing bullshit.
>>4294748thanks for the info, freni just like the idea of having an physical photo instantly. i played with a polaroid years ago so that was my first thought but checking prices per shot of film the instax seemed to be more affordable and as you mentioned i also heard the instax film is more consistant.might end up getting both anyway.thoughts on the mini/go sizes? are they fun or too small?
>>4294769>thoughts on the mini/go sizes?I wrote extensively about the Go here: >>4272893The tl;dr is that the Go is an interesting tradeoff between film size and camera size, with cost as a benefit (compared to i-type), while Instax Mini is more of a value proposition than a practical one due to the camera and the film consistency. The film size is not completely useless, once you get the hang of it you can make very pretty pictures with enough detail to call yourself satisfied. I've already posted all the Go shots I could ITT, as all the rest are personal.Another note of caution: Polaroid development time is long. You'll have to keep the picture in the dark for the first 15 minutes, but then it will continue to slowly develop for over a month which is why you shouldn't store them (basically keep them exposed to air) during this time. It's a weird feeling to look at the same picture a few week later and see it improved, more detailed and with more contrast.The quick and cheap way to judge is to print (or draw) 1:1 scale of the various instant formats, cut them, and hold them in your hand.
>>4294932thanks againmaybe ill have some shots to share before long
Is /p/ a dead board now? seems kinda lame here now ngl.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.70.007 (170607)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1565Image Height1037
>>4295133Why do you use his name anyway
>>4295143I liked it and he was using a different name, but the same trip code, at the time.Shitposting about the joys of reflex is fun too.
>>4289378Burton Barr?
I come have a look once in a while but at some point I thought it was too good to post here. Now I just barely take photos.
>>4294263Sugar you fucktard, we all remember that albino witch you dated.
You're welcome: https://natashagudermane.com/press/press/
>>4294365>canon is nikon company man Ken Rockwell It makes too much sense. His poor children.
>>4294362It's not about it being color, it's about the whole photograph being a lame excuse to show a nude woman>>4294365>>4294431Just absurd, also Ken unironically cheered on EVIL cameras since their inception. He really liked the a77.>>4294380Feminist shock commentary that relies on coomers to gain any semblance of relevancy.
>>4294359Greetings from Bavaria.
>>4294431>His poor childrenWhat makes you say that?Katie's been looking thick.
>>4294973Get this girl to a dietician asap>looking awayEven katie knows mirrorless and digislug photo spam is cringe. She’ll probably grow up to be a patrician film leica shooter.