Anyone know what is going on with my camera? I just got a Canon 5d classic and all of a sudden there sre black bars on the lower portion of my photos. I took the lens off and it looks like the mirror only flips up half way when taking a photo. If I turn the camera vertical it works just fine though and flips up all the way. Reslly odd. J suspect it might be caught on something? I know the 5D has mirror issues but I havent heard of this before. The shitty part is that this 5D was in pretty mint condition otherwise with very few acctuations.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (Android)PhotographerkarubeMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:09:15 10:42:12Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4361151Everyone hates nikon anon>entire brand outsold by the x100vikek fuji won
>>4361160Nikon shooters actually post photos doe
>>4361151>Snoyschizo doesn't realize he fell into the same insanityhole as Clive and manages to make him look normal and well adjusted even right at times. I actually think he hates Nikon more than Clive hates Sony.
>>4361244That 26 is the single worst lens I've ever owned.
>>4361151>Thinking there's just one "snoy schizo" (everyone who finds your sony spamming mentally disturbed)Kek.>Thinking every fat fuck brand fanboy mad about pancakes is cliveKEK>Thinking you can spot people named AnonymousK3K
Why are Sony cameras so clunky? They look like they were put together using cannibalized parts from three or four different cameras from different brands.
This:>>4361186is way more consistent than this:>>4361176
>>4361199They're both ugly messes of matte black which is the photographic ideal. They don't reflect light or give you anything to look at besides the center of the lens. You're meant to tape over any other markings just to be sure, so the subject doesn't focus on it, and you're not meant to be paying attention to your camera at all.
>>4361176OP will do anything but go outside and take pictureskys today
>>4361176Thats because Snoy cameras are unintuitive mini computers with poor ergonomics, they aren't true photographic tools for real photographers.
>>4361217Can we see some of your true photographs taken by a real photographer?inb4 this is you[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-M5MarkIICamera SoftwareCapture One WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3000Image Height2000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias-1/2 EVSubject Distance0.65 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmImage Width4545Image Height3030RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationLowSharpnessSoft
What is these types of shots called? How do you shoot like this?
>>4360307nothing about any particular shot in the assemblage seems remarkable, just some pans and zooms and walking with the camera, maybe for some of the snappier ones they're also dropping frames here and there
>>4360309Never, ever listen to someone on /p/ telling you a certain look is simple to achieve.
>>4360301It looks like a DJI Osmo Pocket set to "hyperlapse", specifically.
>>4360301>What is these types of shots called?Instashit>How do you shoot like this?You don't. You edit like this.
>>4360301The kind that makes me vomit
Why are all cameras the same? Where's the innovation? This can't be peak design when every single camera feels shitty to use.Where are personalisation options? Why are photographers so stuck up to not have any or put any of their personality into their gear that they spend 6 hours a day discussing about?
>>4360849>Yes, photography is art, and cameras can be compared to paintinglmfao what a retard
>>4360988>if only they made different bodies for different uses
>>4360995Just put a grip on. Same thing and all their cameras can finally share the same battery now. i think only the discontinued(?) rx100 and rx10 still use different batteries.
>>4360851>>4360932Based
>>4361011a6100 and a6400 are still in the lineup and not the same battery as the a6600, a6700, and the full frames.Theyre both due to be discontinued any time now though.
Feel free to dump any figurine images you got.Here are a few of mine.
My most expensive figure[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:09:09 12:40:35Exposure Time2 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/11.0Brightness-19/640 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
does this count >>4357869
>>4357964>the belly squishHatsune Meatku?
Just got this one on gatcha lol[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M6 Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:09:18 04:24:30Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashFocal Length22.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4357982ye
According to a leading photographer and fine art print-guy, the Lumix S1R (along with Hasselblad cameras) are the best cameras you can get.After that, Nikon. Then Sony. And last is Canon.
>>4360491>>4360497I've been running Linux as my primary OS for over 15 years and not once have I seen fonts render like that. I don't know where people get that from. I definitely have seen rendering like that on windows dialog boxes and all windows programs while using RDP.
So should I buy a Lumix S1R or not?
>>4360979Its just a worse sony a7riii
>>4360986for photos, absolutely.
>>4361180for everythings1r has ass rolling shutter. codecs mean nothing with that camera. codecs mean nothing for most video. most people only need 1080p 30 with good colors and autofocus that doesnt need constant button pressing. for pro video even the s5 sucks, g9ii mogs it because noise and sharpness wank means nothing for the movies
M43 sister, what have you been up to? I know, I know, we're adventurers at heart and go out and shoot rather than debate on a mongolian anime figurine shooter board but summer's coming to an end.Let's bring back /m43/ and get those fool framers shit their pants because they spent 4 times as much for 8 times as bad cameras.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.98 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmImage Width1944Image Height2592RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4360813Okay, you can have another one, but it's the last one, OK?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:09:16 19:58:44White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1440Image Height1800RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
>>4360815Are you even a photographer or are you a utilities inspector who came here to gearfag over things other than transformers and wire gauges?
>>4360818No you aren't getting any more, maybe ask again tomorow
bros, I lost my tripod. can't find it anywhere. :([EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance43.40 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmImage Width1944Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHard
:D[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-5Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:09:16 12:45:46Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length42.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4725Image Height3786RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[Chorus]You could gain from being a bit nicerKnow when to talk and when to shut your mouthYou're so moody, always such a fighterTry to open up your mind sometimes[Post-Chorus]You'll be just fineSay da-di-do, da-di-doDa-di-do, da-di-doDa-di-do, da-di-da-da
>>4355317>>4355320Kodak Black is that you?
>>4358787When I can live with his titles then I can live with that, odds are I have my eyes elsewhere and just listen anyway.
>>4355301it is a real song; it is his introgoogle the lyrics moron
>>4355196new simonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpxikcxCv_w
NEW FLAGSHIP CANON R1: Real world results from professional wildlife photographer Simon d'Entremont.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCjT8ze3jdQ
How do I find models to shoot?
>>4360910Go outside, normal people are saying incel chad and stacy now, bruv. Incel vernacular with all the pills and pasta is poignant and funny. It totally recontextualizes the gender wars into the loser wars. The only wrong parts are the idea that celibacy is involuntary, that anyone is owed sex, and that all women are lustful cheaters who hyperfocus on their partners physique (that's actually the weirdo dudes projecting).>>4360913Weddings aren't soul crushing. It's just taking photos. Would you prefer shooting your cat? Now that's time in capture one well spent.
>>4360915You just listed the reason why I would never do this my main activity.
>>4360916>the reason: its taking photosIt's not meant to be a main, lifelong activity. It's meant to be a place to build a credible business as someone interested in doing quality photography.You only need to do a half dozen weddings to pay for all the gear you'll ever need and put away five figures for later.And then, you can find models. Real ones, not models that do it to get laid as often as the solo "i wanna shoot portraits" guys.
>>4360918you are that faggot with the big ass rf 24 105 2.8 from previous thread
>>4360924I wish I had these kinds of detective skills
Sold all my camera gear (Fuji apsc) some years ago. Now I wanna get back into photography. Just as a hobby, not professional but I still want high quality. I do lots of weekend trips and traveling with family so I don't want a huge camera with big zoom lenses. Probably one or two prime lenses are enough for me. Being familiar with Fuji the new X100VI looks very good to me. My prefered focal length, good viewfinder, etc. I know it's not available now but lets ignore that fact for now. But then I was thinking why not going full frame this time. Back then it was too expensive but now it seems very reasonable. The Sony A7CII doesn't look much bigger than the Fuji and is in a similar price category. But the last time I tested a Sony (I believe it was the A7III) I really disliked it.. felt more like a computer than a fun camera. For me the overall experience when taking photos takes a big part of it. Anyone here who has experience with both cams that could give me a suggestion?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T10Camera SoftwarePixelmator Pro 3.6.5Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)73 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:18 15:59:57Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness4.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length48.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height701RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4360919>what is 35mm f/2Dumbass
>>4360923The fuji lens is equivalent to a 35mm *f3* you fucking retard.A 35mm f2.8 is actually very slightly faster. Never mind all the technical issues with xtrans taking a gorillion mp to outdo a 16mp micro four thirds and equal a canon dslr from 2010.
>>4360505This looks like fucking shit.
>>4361091its a plastic 3 element lens wide open without any editing bro. its literally meant for film sim lomography larping like holga: digislug edition.
>>4360788Dont the links tell of things like em5iis having dead control dials after being rained on… lolympus.
...was amazing.Nice shallow depth of field. Lovely colorgrading using blues and greens and turqouise.Interesting distortion on the borders of the frame. Nice odd oval bokeh.Would love to make the same pictures.And it seemed they used:Venice 2Class-xV-LiteT1shttps://www.reddit.com/r/ShogunTVShow/comments/1b29uxm/why_does_this_show_look_like_its_shot_in_a_very/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4354383everything now is obsessed with having the shallowest focus possible its insane. bazin was right
>>4357434>character starts talking>focus shifts abruptly to them>they stop talking>focus shifts elsewhereJUST LET ME LOOK AROUND! I am capable of following along without your holding my eyes in the right direction.
the nighttime scenes looked like actual dogshitwould it kill them to add some lights instead of trying to fix it in post?
>>4357435>but Ridley Scott is rightSo we should shoot 2.39:1. Got it. He hasn't done a single film in 2:1.
vely implessive, jipangu. now let's see chyna's emmies.
Ausfags, help a mate out, I know you guys lurk here.>doing wildlife photography in Victoria, I live next to wetlands and grassland. >get some nice heron pics>oh sweet some lorikeets, that's cool>oh those ducks look nice the morning light>alright now to try some new stuff>oh it's just birds>it's JUST birds, guysI feel like I'm doomed to photograph the same birds for eternity because I'm not close to bushland. Is Australian wildlife really this boring? I saw a blue-tongue lizard last week and my heart jumped cause I finally saw a living thing without wings. I see a few dead roos on the highway but the living ones are quite far from where I live. I'm not a birder, lads, I actually want to take interesting photos.Still not as boring as western Europe though.
>>4360954>>oh it's just birds>>it's JUST birds, guyslike everywhere else. guess why bird photography is so popular. because birds are everywhere and you don't need to track them through the bush for days
>>4360972>The only dangerous thing where I live are a) magpiesheh I've seen that episode of Bluey. wondered if it's really this bad in straya
>>4360992>zoos but that feels like cheating?that's what most amateur wildlife photogs do most of the time. unless you can afford an expedition to some remote wildlife refuge where you stay for days/weeks to shoot some fucking rare cat/bear/cow you will have to visit zoos. see it as an exercise
>>4361093>you don't need to track them through the bush for daysIf you want to get the actually cool ones you kind of do
>>4361096there are no cool birds
bros were gonna make it https://petapixel.com/2024/09/06/photography-is-one-of-the-most-attractive-male-hobbies-to-women/
>>4357942i buy the vintage part but not the snoy
>>4357472He is right you know, she probably wanted to expose you on twitter lol
>>4357039Nobody is going to make it with photography unless you are good looking, it is concerning because i noticed that a lot of photographer having success are quit good looking.Also from my own experience, when i work with models, they often feel not comfortable with me and i can feel that they start to get piss off when i ask them to do something, i see in their eyes that they only want their nice photos for instagram and that's it.But there is not surprise, it's like that in every field, not only photography.So yeah women find photographer attractive, IF THEY ARE FUCKING ATTRACTIVE BEFORE STARTING PHOTOGRAPHY
>>4360971You must be the guy who keeps calling people too ugly to shoot models
Photography is a foid hobby because it requires no fucking skills at all
Say I use a denoiser? My current set up is pretty bad low light so I was thinking of cranking up iso and dealing with it in post My autistic friend who only shoots analog is complaining about it and warning me as a noob to avoid it saying it "changes the original pixels"
>>4360999technically no such thing as cheating unless you're in a competitionI draw the line at generative AI hallucinating things into existance, for me even using photoshop cut crap out is fair if it enchances the photo, channel relatedthis guy photoshops in almost all his pics, wish I cared enough to try as wellhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/YenbY2F31I8
>>4360999It's not cheating, but instead of learning how to take photos you're learning how to make photos
Film fags that shoot in manual are autistic and this like if of thinking will only harm your photography
>>4360999It will be cheating when our cameras are just constantly recording 8k video while bracketing aperture and AI picks out the best frames as photos
>it "changes the original pixels"Changing the pixels is what editing is. If you don't change the pixels then you haven't changed anything about hos the image looks. Whether or not it changes the "original" pixels in the file you got from your camera (which the camera itself will have fucked about with, and no point was there ever a file with perfectly pristine data) depends on whether or not you save over that original file or not. AI or not doesn't matter for any of that. Now if your friend really is autistic and you're not just saying that to fill your daily buzzword quota then with his mind set he's pathologically incapable of grasping this, but why the fuck isn't it obvious to you?
Continuation of >>4346389. If you could only own one camera/lens, what would it be?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1574Image Height2100Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4360305>I love my momBASEDMAXXING
fucking horrible photo but that's my everyday carryplus two backs, a 127mm lens for the RB and a 105mm lens for the FM2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 8 ProEquipment MakeXiaomiImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4624Image Height2136Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:08:25 22:34:54F-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time41667/1000000 secFocal Length5.43 mmFlashNo FlashISO Speed Rating1156Image Height2136Image Width4624Lens Aperturef/1.9
>>4360540why do you carry a rb67 with two 35mm? wouldn't the RB cover everything the others can do ?
>>4361020Those cameras have the absolute worst ergonomics ever. Almost anything will focus faster and be easier to use.
>>4361020>why do you carry a rb67 with two 35mm?the Rollei is something to have in my pocket and shoot stuff i find interesting on the fly, normally with a low iso film because it's mostly for street in broad daylightthe FM2 with two different focal lengths that covers most occasions, and normally with a B&W film pushed to 1600 or 3200and the RB has its own kind of photos. it's slow, it's huge and not everything needs to be shot in medium formatbut some things do