>>4338322
You're either smart enough to know, playing games, or it's wasted on you. Simple as. I don't live to spoonfeed you.

>>4338323
The E420 is just a god camera bro its the best.

>>4338133
>>4338125
>>4338127
its all just that nikon baldy that bought a pen-f and returned it cus he cant hit focus on anything starting arguments with himself.

>>4338332
now this is schizophrenia
please touch grass

>>4338347
?

>>4333130
>Should I sell now or should I wait a year or so?
If you can afford to wait a year, just keep it. You'll get bored of mft before then and wish you had your d700 back

>>4333532
you are literally claiming foolturds breaks the laws of physics

lenses get sharper when stopped down until the lens diffracts
on foolturds 20mp-24mp this happens past f5.6
on ff of similar res this happens past f11
only on high res ff does it also happen at f5.6 but then ALL rules of “equivalence” are broken and no longer apply because the resolution is significantly higher

most lens tests are done on high res bodies to gather the most detailed info about the lens, but if you have a 24mp ie zf your lenses will all get sharper until f16!

>>4334638
Careful, you say it too much and they start appearing and clogging up the local KFCs

>>4333703
>Why not take a hammer to the balls instead of using mft?
He wants to savour the moment.
You can only rupture your testicles twice.

>>4335250
With modern medicine and HRT you can grow new balls .

File: IMG_8203.jpg (471 KB, 1439x2048)

471 KB JPG

i got that 135mm SOFT

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 700D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.1.3
Lens Name	EF135mm f/2.8 (with Softfocus)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:24 16:06:11
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	-1.7 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1439
Image Height	2048
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Av-Priority
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	1
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	131

File: DSC07404.jpg (3.03 MB, 3072x2304)

3.03 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-W35
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:10:23 03:31:25
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3072
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard

File: IMG_20240717_013713_379.jpg (191 KB, 853x1280)

191 KB JPG

I got a couple

>>4334999

The Nikkor sets the standard which all other 50mm's are judged by!

>>4335336
>>4334999
Only get the Nikkor if it's the version with 0.45m close focusing, the others aren't worth as much as that one

>>4335005
where did you find a summitar that needs work? the only ones i can find are scratched to hell but have zero fungi

>>4335001
You're just gonna ask that question and leave me hanging?

>>4337733
Seems everyone abandoned this thread

>>4332453
>developing the most primitive focusing aide after a basic distance scale is not feasible
Its actually a wonder how leicas is still so primitive. If canon made an ORF it would probably zoom to match the lens and work with RF mount and digital coupling.

Why not yet? No one wants it except for street photographer wannabes (aka irrelevant gearfags). And most of them would call anything not leica branded “soulless fragile junk and a cheap copy of a real camera” as they packed up their m4 for its yearly CLA and ORF adjustment

The X100 IS a digital rangefinder camera, you fucking moron.

>>4330475
>But since cameras as a whole have become an insignificant niche
Because marketing to a niche of a niche isn't a workable business strategy.

>>4332706
what fucking kind of acronym is ORF? not a single person ever says that you autist
>500+ rolls over 3 years through my M2 and no CLA yet

>>4334037
No rangefinder tho

>>4335698
>kike fanfiction

File: IMG_20230819_204154_237.jpg (502 KB, 1600x1600)

502 KB JPG

>>4335700
it's commentary on ipad culture

File: DSC06960editSMBDR.jpg (1.97 MB, 1600x1600)

1.97 MB JPG

oh colour

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DSC06974editSMBDR.jpg (2.23 MB, 1600x1600)

2.23 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DSC06999editSMBDR.jpg (2.09 MB, 1600x1600)

2.09 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

Uhmm... Instax?
Uhmmmmm... Old film cameras?
Uhmmmmmmmm... why though?
Please take the bait, I really don't know, and want to know.

>>4338244
>Uhmm... Instax?
I am not a teenager girl (god I wish)
>Uhmmmmm... Old film cameras?
we are gonna run out of them sooner than later

>>4338245
Thanks. I will buy instax now.

File: IMG_5740.jpg (206 KB, 1213x1149)

206 KB JPG

>>4331899
No thanks I will rather take this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	2732
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I will stick with my Nikon FG. It is the smallest and lightest camera I am comfortable with, as well as having an adequate metering system for shooting slide film.

>>4336312
>>4336314
>>4336315
Nice sequence - where?

>>4337759

45°21'21.6"N 14°42'59.7"E

File: 1721108702238.jpg (113 KB, 820x596)

113 KB JPG

>>4336315
Will the water come back?

File: IMG_6320c.jpg (1.82 MB, 1000x1500)

1.82 MB JPG

>>4338028
It did, don't worry.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	EOS RP
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1 dp
Vertical Resolution	1 dp
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	100
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: 564564_proc.jpg (2.15 MB, 1000x1500)

2.15 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	EOS M
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
ISO Speed Rating	100
Focal Length	42.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>4338043
Ever hear of Gordon Parks, Lee Friedlander, Vivian Maier, or Walker Evans you fucking gearfag

>>4338030
Interesting catch but I just meant macro four thirds as a silly insult because it’s only just a bit bigger than full frame and nowhere near even 645 never mind proper medium format sizes.

>>4328306
>>4328309
How to get the bottom of the picture look good in 44mm? Like if taking a picture of some building or monument the the center, the top come out really nice but the bottom part is always ugly. If I come closer then I get only part of the building (like in posts above) if I walk to0 far I get the ground, people, street/road sings in the picture. How do I get good a composition with 40mm?

File: DSCF1106_DxO.jpg (3.2 MB, 4000x2992)

3.2 MB JPG

PC died and it's annoying to edit on my laptop so the rest will have to wait.

>>4337983
Thanks. It's all gear wanking one way or the other, which I couldn't care less about. Just look at all the stuff after your post.

>>4338030
Dumb thing to complain about IMO. I'd prefer a circular or square sensor to maximize the image circle.

>>4338103
Personally I just focus on the part of the building I like. If you want the full thing, consider going far and stacking a bunch of shots to get rid of stuff that gets in the frame. Often, the ideal angle to shoot a large building is somewhat elevated off the ground, which is of course seldom possible.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	GFX 100
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 5.16.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	44 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:16 22:24:59
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	-1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2992
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Shutter Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>4321232
cat in a microwave lol

>>4338100
Huskychad had some really good photos at least

>>4336735
>>4336738
i like these ones

So attention starved kek

File: 7D Velvia 50 CoolScan.jpg (245 KB, 1384x691)

245 KB JPG

>>4337725
>You have it backwards, jose.
No, I don't think I do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2010:08:14 02:25:16
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1384
Image Height	691

File: MF-Fuji-RVP-Howtek-vs-5Ds.jpg (800 KB, 2370x1185)

800 KB JPG

>>4337725
>Decent 35mm ie: portra 400, slower films shot competently, with quality lenses, has no problems matching 24mp-36mp ff in detail,
lol
lmfao

Left is 6x9 Fuji Velvia on a Howtek drum scanner. Not 35mm. 6x9. So no, 35mm is not going to match "24-36mp ff in detail."

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4337725
>while digital has different levels static noise in all 3 color channels confusing the demosaicing algorithm further.
Why can't film fans into Bayer? Bayer sensors have better color accuracy across a wider gamut than any film. You need to go to 4x5 to have the fine tonality and color gradations of FF digital. That's not to say film color cannot be amazing. But color palette...how a film (or photographer in post editing) interprets a scene and the artistic impact of that interpretation...is a separate question from accuracy and gamut.

>On moire inducing subjects like distant foliage or pine needles on the ground, film will actually outperform higher resolution digital cameras.
No. 45-61mp FF out resolves anything in 6x9 except Adox CMS 20, which is no longer available in 6x9. That one film is the only one remaining in 35mm that can stand toe to toe with high rez FF on detail. Not that there were many others in the past. Maybe another one or two B&W films like CMS 20.

>If you weren't a bit of a retard...
Do you even own a camera? Have you ever actually tested high rez FF digital against film on a drum scanner? No? Be quiet.

>>4337620
70-300mm, pretty sure it was f/3.5-5.6 but I'd have to go back and check cos it was a while ago. We weren't shooting covertly, we would fly past vessels about 100ft off the water

>>4337616
Got an EOS 3000 for like $20+shipping and the seller included a roll of kodak 400, a bag, and an EF 28-80mm lens. Honestly a steal, but it wasn't difficult to find. I know these late-film cameras aren't super desirable but if you want film, there ya go champ

>>4337653
Was that one of those stabilized lenses? Also who were you working for? Sounds neat.

>>4337678
I already have a few Minolta MD mount cameras. I used to have a Maxxum 400si but the piece of shit broke and was stuck in Program mode permanently

>>4337799
Nah we didn't use stabilised camera lenses but we used stabilised binoculars to identify vessels. A small coastguard-style operation doing fisheries work against illegal fishing from other countries and some smuggling operations. Was very good fun.

>>4336433
That's not a camera feature, it's a film stock feature and to a lesser extent a lens feature. Don't buy bodies to achieve a look, buy different stocks. The body is little more than a dark box with controls. The most relevant features of a body are the mount and the modes it offers.

File: 0F513551-4684-4C3C-925B-8(...).jpg (2 MB, 4032x2268)

2 MB JPG

Took using an Iphone 12 mini. 0.5 zoom

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	2268
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4294112
Better to wait for the s25 ultra

>>4337495
So which model camera would you ideally pair it with, the OM-1 mkII or is there something else even more suitable for macro in combination with this lens?

>>4337595
With the 90mm I would go for an E-M1.3, OM-1.1 or OM-1.2. For macro they're all acceptable, with some non essential benefits for the newer models like better IBIS. Subject detect AF is a lot better on the OM-1.2, so if you see yourself birding I'd go with that. Buffer size and readout speeds are way faster on the OM-1 with the stacked sensor as well. tldr E-M1/OM-1 line, read the specs and decide for yourself

>>4332200
What alien species is this?

>>4337595
Everything since the em1.3 is the same fucking camera dont fall for the om shitstem meme and spend a boatload on a bridge camera

>inb4 the buffer depth really makes or breaks my shots when i go birding from my car

>>4338042
The OM-1 has way better C-AF, and the OM-1.2 improves further on subject tracking especially. These matter a lot for birding but if you just do macro they don't matter.

>>4337945
>it's somehow hard to fathom there's likely a single autist yelling commie at everything that triggers him

>>4337984
How new are you
Go check the archives for sugar announcing he would spam the mft thread to bumplock with communist propaganda (and then doing so) because he's a tripfaggot just like yourself
All tripfaggots are retarded attention seeking homos that deserve the rope

>>4337985
>proving my point
kek
If he were an actual commie he wouldn't do something that would only make people angry at communism

>>4337985
>Go check the archives for sugar announcing he would spam the mft thread to bumplock
Let me guess, because it was 99% charts and made up nonsense about equivalence and mismeasured "dynamic range", 0.9% shitposts, and 0.1% photos?

File: IMG_2915.jpg (1.66 MB, 1243x1865)

1.66 MB JPG

fucking communists goddamnit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE (3rd generation)
Camera Software	17.5.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:14 16:05:06
Exposure Time	1/121 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	4.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2486
Image Height	3731
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: P1090559.jpg (973 KB, 2000x1500)

973 KB JPG

I'm not sure what kinda clouds these are, but I thought it looked neat. It reminded me of the texture of hard poop.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-GF2
Camera Software	Ver.1.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:08 14:49:44
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	14.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: A6608032.jpg (1.27 MB, 3000x2000)

1.27 MB JPG

Sunset

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6600
Camera Software	ILCE-6600 v1.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	16 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:29 20:41:56
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	11.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: A6609971.jpg (729 KB, 3000x2000)

729 KB JPG

>>4335936
After sundown when green ghosts roam

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6600
Camera Software	ILCE-6600 v1.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	16 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:29 22:34:01
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-10.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	11.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

good one