>creamy>dreamy>soft >fallout>BOKEHMfw. What are some other photography memes that drive you crazy? I get that good bokeh is about the only thing that separates us from phone pics but come on either obsession already.
>>4311933Usually they are referring to things that don't matter like chromatic aberration, corner softness, and distortion. The fact of the matter is that with a few exceptions almost all lenses made since the 60s have been more than good enough for everything except extremely technical photography.But as a reviewer you can't say everything is good because then it it's not really a review. So they create artificial product separation where the differences are technically real, but actually meaningless with regard to the photo output. Same goes for autofocus.
>>4311831'game changer' makes me seethe every time. youtubers can't stop saying this dumb phrase when it clashes hideously with every other piece of their diction. it sounds like something an out of touch boomer thinks culturally relevant young scammers and grifters say. i one time heard it in real life and got whiplash
>>4311817faggot.
>>4311813see>>4311817"It" is singular"They" is pluralThere are two sexes (gender is made up)>>4311815American education on full displayPoor little zoomers cannot even understand basic grammmatic concepts
>>4312009>There are two sexes (gender is made up)Truth
What is you all's opinion of him going over old cameras?https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbBZM9aUMsjHKIbURZXP3E8i8Fl_xfc2d
>>4308169Go to small town thrift stores in the midwest and semi-rural areas. They still believe digishits are worth $5. Then start a youtube channel to drive up prices after you've accumulated at least 50 of them so you can sell them for $100 each.Boom, now you have a nikon Z8 and an S lense
>>4308160I bought one of the "top-end" mavica floppy disk camera after watching his video about the mavica. Thankfully i found in on thriftstore for around 30 bucks or so.It's one of the reason why I'm into "older" digital camera rn though I'm specifically more into mid to late 2000s camera phones like SE K800 or Nokia N95. My first camera phone is an iphone 3g so it's interesting to use what is pretty much superior camera that came years before
>>4308224I hate his new obsession with garbo quickstart PCs, buy more obsolete broadcast equipment!
>>4308160he uses these cameras in the same way that everyone on this board would
Why is a fucking YouTuber thread up
And all my photos are fucking garbage and I'm realizing my edits look like total shit I think because I subconsciously try to replicate the iphone HDR look. What the fuck do I do? How do I get better at shooting in imperfect settings?
>>4311532>local business group so pretty corporateThey will accept the shittiest of pictures, you're unironically completely safe. Shit could be out of focus and they would still be cool with it.
>>4311534Yeah you right. I'm more disappointed in myself than anything, lol.
>>4311537That's fine too, you'll improve from your fuckups. Just don't worry much about this one.
>>431151248 is reasonable. I got about 38 very good shots on my first shoot (100 mediocre, 800 shite), and 44 (130 mediocre, 950 shite) on my second. If it's going to be used on social media whoever you did the shots for isn't going to use every single one.
>>4311078shoot moreYou're being too harsh on yourself, nobody gives a shit about your pics they either want to see themselfs or see the subject they care about
what am i in for /p/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4311734Diversity, equity and inclusion.
>>4311777based Sony
>>4311777>lol sony callin matthew on his shitOPie youre in for walking around carrying a block of uncomfortable controls positioned stupidly and endlessly fucking around in the badly designed menu mess just to take the next goddamn picture until you get to tye pount where its just not worth it anymore, just like we all did eventually. Sony has yet to learn that engineers make poor designers.
>>4311734either nos or you were scammed real bad
>>4311903i needed one fast thats why
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 2000DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:06 12:33:52Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4307951what was shutter speed?
>image limit on a photography boardsomeone new thread please
an eternal recent photo thread would be cool
>>4310868qt>>4310090High speed internets
continued from >>4293925i won't bother to ask for any sort of feedback this time. in fact, please refrain from responding at all. now i'm just posting for the sake of adding photos to the board. if you think they suck, then make a new thread and post better photos.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:12:13 21:35:12Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:25 01:22:21Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 23:41:52Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness6.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 00:35:08Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-2.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 02:50:20Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
Wow OP these all suck!
My mom cleared out her basement and gave me her old 110 camera she used back in the day. Anyone ever shot with this format? Looks like a roll is ~$10 and dev is $12 for 24 exposures. I don’t have high hopes since the negatives are so small, but it’s portable
>>4308045I mean...if you want to play with it just because, go ahead. But 110 and Kodak Disc were dog shit. They looked bad at 3x5.
i'd shoot lots of 110 if i could bulk roll hp5 and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffed
>>4311593Cut your own, and you can 3d print a reel
>>4311593>and find a reel for patterson tanks that doesn't look skuffedsounds like you just didn't look and wanted us to do the work for you, faggot, there's plenty of results for 110 reels on ebay from reputable brands and offbrand chinese>b-but skuffedwhat does that even mean?
>>4308389Looks like something Zach will take 10 years from now
what are some good jackets for storing all of you camera lenses in that makes it easier to change it from one to another when on the go while photographing?
You stupid pieces of shit
>>4307613Wiggy’s Fossil Ridge Parka. I shoot mostly in winter, & Wiggy’s makes the warmest & most rugged sleeping bags in the world, he invented the insulation, so his Parkas are all made to order but fucking excellent as excellent gets. We all used them when I was still in the Marines. The fossil ridge is for arctic hunts, so full of shell & game pockets, so my lenses & camera bodies of all sizes all have a place.
>>4307613>good jacketsJust get a photo vest and wear that over your existing jacket. I use a surplus molle load-bearing vest with some surplus pouches.
>>4311846Hell yeah fellow Wiggys appreciator. I have the urban parka, and wear the liner jackets in fall/winter. Best cold weather gear money can buy. The comforters are amazing too.
>>4311741>How to sweat to death and weigh a ton at the same time.Deck is 100% cotton. So no, you won't sweat to death.They used to have that issue with some other jackets with plastic parts but I haven't faced with this problem to be honest.
I just found out these can be really useful for more than just macro, which I found out that are great for getting a 1:1 ratio on your subject.What I didn't know is something like a 105mm/2.8 also makes an outstanding portrait lens along with even an all-around good prime lens. Also typically it'll be cheaper than a similar fast lens. Is this really the best type of lens for all pictures until you need some kind of zoom?
>>4310147It means you can take a picture of a subject that is the size of your camera sensor and it will fill up the whole frame of the picture.
>>4310147It means the image projected onto the sensor is true to life size, a one to one representation. So for example if you took a picture of a ruler at 1:1 focus, one cm on the ruler will be one cm on the sensor. This of course does not mean it will be 1cm in your image, depending on resolution and cropping and whatever else you may do to the resulting image. Generally considered the minimum for a proper macro lens, despite manufacturers putting 1:2s out there and calling them “macro”.
>>4309479I have a Canon 35mm F2.8 macro lens with a built-in ring light, absolutely love it as a general purpose lens. Plus it takes fantastic bug pics.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.9Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4434Image Height2979Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2024:05:01 21:26:26
>>4311773great shot!
>>4309479You know what I like op, shooting with the Nik Z 50 macro but sticking a stack of extension tubes under it anyway, getting a 2:1 magnification without any added distortion. Go out on the lawn and shoot the strange world in the grass jungle.
Used my art lens for the first time in a long time. Didnt have much time to compose these photos but I had fun taking them![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
>>4310723or gtfo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1482
>>4311673>>4311674little homoerotic but BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW color palette is attractive
Alright, now is the time to buy. Apparently hollywood is using soviet photo glass for movies now. Companies are rehousing them into film lenses. Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass. I know the Helios m42 is legend. what else should I look at. I am on L mount.
>>4307249i'm the anon that is in armenia, they're about $20 WITH the zenit cameras here, it's cheap as fuck
>>4304170Here is the list of most common ones with description and testshttps://radojuva.com/en/photo-review/#russian
>>4304170>soviet glass to L mount10/10 op thank you
I shouldn't have bought mine from Ukraine, it got stuck in K-City for nearly a month.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Modelmoto g power (2021)Equipment MakemotorolaSensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:03 18:08:00Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating400Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/1.7Exposure Time1/24 secFocal Length4.71 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryLight SourceD65Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness-1.8 EVExposure ModeAutoImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4304170>Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass.the Helios was a bit of an odd choice in this scene imo, it's just the emperor talking about politics with his daughter but the swirl makes it feel like a dizzying dream
I plan on getting a camera for decent feet photography. Most of the images I see are very unprofessional and of much lower quality than they could be. It would also be ideal if I could record decent 4K video with this camera.
>>4311680same bruh tf is this
>>4311654People who like feet want real women's feet. If it's a real woman, then you know there's a chance you could meet her one day and get a chance to sniff her feet and slobber all over them for hours.
>>4311684I NEED to know his website. I discovered this website that posts hot photos of teens around a year ago. It doesn't fit the definition of pornography, so it's perfectly legal. I imagine "subtle" images of feet would also not fit the definition of pornography, but so far, I haven't been able to find any websites featuring plenty of photos of teen feet.https://www.free-photos.biz/https://www.free-photos.biz/blog/https://www.free-photos.biz/photographs/people/photos_of_girls
>>4311654what would you rather watch;1 a real video or real ariana grande getting fucked hard and enjoying it2 fake AI video of cartoon ariana grande getting fuckedexactly... people want to see REAL WOMENS feet not some AI bullshit
>>4311684>>4311791https://www.stephanpartipilo.com/https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/3735515/497945
Took this photo of a cute lovely bird[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX120 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.00 - 60.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created1980:01:01 00:04:05Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/4.3ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.3Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance13.630 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number130-1950
>>4296093so many
>>4239795Very cute bird, OP, thanks.
>>4239795that be a seedgull
Nice bird.
ducks!
Why is the best setting?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 13:58:58Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1266Image Height918
>>4309904>Le manufacturers lieHave you ever actually looked it up?Sony/canon/nikon ISOs are all about 1/3 of a stop slower than the film standard is meant to be, barely anythingOnly fuji/olympus/panasonic are further off than that (2/3-1 stops slower than stated), because they mostly sell crop sensors and mislabeling ISO makes it easier for the marketing liars to say they have good dynamic range.>>4309893>There is no such thing as ISONot in dual gain cameras. They have two gain circuits that have different shadow recovery characteristics.>Sticking to ISO 100 when a shot calls for slightly more (like 1/3 of a stop) actually degrades quality.No it doesn't because 1/3 of a stop more ISO is within that gain stage, only aperture and shutter speed actually control how much light you get into the camera. That becomes a question when you're choosing say, ISO 200 or 400 on a camera where the second gain stage kicks in between 200 and 400. Then shoot at the second base ISO and you get less noise. If you recover shadows past the second base ISO it also typically looks a bit worse than just shooting at that ISO but who the fuck would recover more than 3 stops of exposure
For some reason one day I woke up and just stopped giving a shit about noise. 400? 800? 1600? Fuck it, we ball. Too noisy? Shrink the image by 20% in post. Looks fine. Fuck the police. Way more important to have a sharp/stable image. Push that shutter speed to the fucking moon. Push it. Force it. Make it your bitch.
>>4309954Did the same thingOne morning I woke up, glued 4 handfuls of sand to a pair of sunglasses, and walked around wearing them so I could truly immerse myself in the best visual experience man has to offer.
>>4309736>>4309812>>4309954Holy mother of based.
Now that ISO invariance is a thing there is no reason (except jpegs) to change ISO on the camera rather than shooting at 100 and pushing 6 stops in post. You're just throwing away headroom for no benefit. I don't know why they don't just make ISO an exif field that tells your RAW program to push it rather than changing the actual pixel values. >>4309893>The electronics can ETTR better than you can fiddling with ISOThey could, but they don't because camera manufacturers are stuck in this dumb "muh jay pegs must look good" mindset. It would be so easy with mirrorless, you're reading off the whole frame anyway, you could just find the brightest pixel and adjust exposure so that the brightest channel is at 2^14 or whatever the max pixel value is. Nikon even has a mode that claims to do this ("highlight-weighted metering") but I've caught it both over and underexposing the raw files presumably to make the jpegs look better.
fucking holy shit how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????https://petapixel.com/2024/05/03/see-portraits-shot-with-leicas-2-million-1600mm-f-5-6-lens/https://youtu.be/vpwivzzR6yU[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4311430Why do so many Germans have such weak facial hair?
>>4311473facial hair signals "leave me alone, i am antisocial and potentially violent" in western cultures
>>4311430this lens seems like a marketing project. What is even so special about the specs or the looks. My meike 50mm f2 looks almost the same: Blurry background and normal looking subject.
>puts a 2x teleconverter on it
>>4311619If only OP had linked to an article talking about who it was made for, and what the customer wanted it for... Though you'd think 1500mm would be something of a clue even without that.