[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Settings Home
/lit/ - Literature

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
05/08/16Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!
[Hide] [Show All]

Janitor applications are now closed. Thank you to everyone who applied!

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: lit.jpg (211 KB, 858x952)
211 KB
211 KB JPG
/lit/ is for the discussion of literature, specifically books (fiction & non-fiction), short stories, poetry, creative writing, etc. If you want to discuss history, religion, or the humanities, go to /his/. If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/. Philosophical discussion can go on either /lit/ or /his/, but ideally those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.

Check the wiki, the catalog, and the archive before asking for advice or recommendations, and please refrain from starting new threads for questions that can be answered by a search engine.

/lit/ is a slow board! Please take the time to read what others have written, and try to make thoughtful, well-written posts of your own. Bump replies are not necessary.

Looking for books online? Check here:
Guide to #bookz
Recommended Literature

File: slavoj ur a white male.png (195 KB, 462x554)
195 KB
195 KB PNG
Name some overprivileged authors and thinkers.
63 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Not to the point where you use it as an excuse to entirely wreck your fucking economy.

>you know what, if I was a dictator, I would have done stuff differently
I'm trying to make sense of your rambling, pls do not add even more nonsensical rambling.

I don't care enough about "le poor peepulz :(" to fuck up the entire system.
Imperfect yes, but holy fucking shit, what is the alternative? Some tweaks are ok, but not your romantic illusions of a revolution. Or that euro model bullshit that can't sustain itself once the USA leaves Europe to cover its own ass.
>once the USA leaves Europe
Ride that tiger hard bro.

File: Closet Roganian.png (72 KB, 585x370)
72 KB
Now that /lit/'s resident philosopher Nick Land has officially endorsed Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson, is it time to drop the Marx and Wittgenstein threads and discuss some REAL intellectuals?
196 replies and 20 images omitted. Click here to view.
all girls should be spayed at birth
Again, google. Hell, you can even email him.
You call him one of the greatest scientists of our time, yet you aren't willing to expend the energy to defend that statement by explaining, not even in a single sentence, why that is the case?
why fucking michio senkaku is there
I said nothing of the sort, but it is very easy to find information now.

But I concede. He realized that language is in fact a quantum singularity and that all philosophy can be described as higher vibrations of the shrodinger equation.

File: 1446005497995.png (120 KB, 485x352)
120 KB
120 KB PNG
Dan Schneider claims to have written 1500 genuinely great poems. By comparison, the greatest published poet of all time, Rainer Maria Rilke, has only 77: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJrj7WvTt8Y

This makes Dan Schneider a literary genius the likes of which the world has never before seen. Hard to believe? Read his poems and judge for yourself: http://cosmoetica.com/Poetrylinks.htm

I'd link a specific one, but that shouldn't matter, as they're all supposedly great. His wife, of course, is the second greatest poet of all time: http://www.cosmoetica.com/Jessica%20Schneider.htm

He also likes to improve poems written by other authors by cutting out unnecessary lines. He performs such excisions on such beloved greats as Yeats, Eliot, Keats, Frost, Ashbery and plenty of others: http://www.cosmoetica.com/TOP.htm

For some examples of his criticism, see him take 2/3 of the meme trilogy to task:


He's a bit kinder to Ulysses, but also considers it extremely overrated, and feels that the film adaptation is superior: https://web.archive.org/web/20111006165411/http://www.noripcord.com/reviews/film/bloom

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Not this guy again

He's a rambling idiot
I'll agree he's a narcissist, but for the sake of argument, may you explain?
Dan 'Dick like a tin can' Schneider
Dan 'Get in the van' Schneider
Dan 'The Hymen divider' Schneider


File: To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.jpg (36 KB, 271x400)
36 KB
How do you guys feel about this? Is it okay to censor literature or is it wrong to showcase works that use words like nigger that are frowned upon nowadays?

11 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
nothing should be censored
>No recommendation has been made

No one in this thread read the article even though it's less than a page

>No recommendation has been made

The cucks at the school board are going to ban them anyway, the only reason it took so long is because of "procedure"
Huckleberry Finn was a blast to read out loud in class. They say nigger about 10 times per page in some sections.
>muh censorship
Can we end this meme? Nobody's banning the fucking book, they're just taking it off the curriculum. REAL banned books are banned quietly so as to avoid the Streistand effect. Also
>To Kill A Mockingbird
Literally dindu nuffin: the book

File: LW-vor-dem-Haus-c.-Fam.jpg (108 KB, 619x841)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
Wittgenstein had long been troubled by his inability to appreciate the greatness of Shakespeare. In 1946, for example, he had written:

>It is remarkable how hard we find it to believe something that we do not see the truth of for ourselves. When, for instance, I hear the expression of admiration for Shakespeare by distinguished men in the course of several centuries, I can never rid myself of the suspicion that praising him has been the conventional thing to do; though I have to tell myself that this is not how it is. It takes the authority of Milton really to convince me. I take it for granted that he was incorruptible. - But I don't of course mean by this that I don't believe an enormous amount of praise to have been, and still to be, lavished on Shakespeare without understanding and for the wrong reasons by a thousand professors of literature.

>One of the difficulties he had in accepting Shakespeare as a great poet was that he disliked many of Shakespeare's metaphors and similes: "Shakespeare's similes are, in the ordinary sense, bad. So if they are all the same good - and I don't know whether they are or not - they must be a law to themselves.

Why didn't Wittgenstein like Shakespeare?
97 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>tfw nietzche never got to die at the right moment OR watch us hold his golden ball
>faust is a play
>this is what plebs believe


also goethe sorta disavowed werther desu
Yes, and?
I was employing the vocabulary of the person I was quoting.

However, to define my own terms, I suppose "authoritarian" is the kingly, even dictatorial, disposition in humans. It's the impulse that makes us lay out the way the world should be for everyone, as though we're rulers of the Earth. Everyone seems to have this inclination.
I think a more accurate word for the concept you're describing is "utopian" - the idea that there is a perfect and achievable solution, which doesn't necessarily correspond to authoritarianism or dictatorship though it's very likely to; you can also have a non-utopian dictatorship, seeking to control things not to perfect them, but merely to improve.

How does one become a poet? I get it, write poetry and be good at it, but let's say an individual has a bunch of work that he'd like published, what next?

Don't most publishers just reject people because they aren't famous classical poets? It's like in the art music scene where people don't really care about hosting your piano recital if you're doing original music. People want the big names of old.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.

Or say you're trans
I think they about covered it.
Participate in poetry contests. That's how I got a short story published.
be good at something else, get famous for that and then publish shitty poetry like every normal poet does

File: ZgnvNCR.gif (978 KB, 500x717)
978 KB
978 KB GIF
The clouds do crumble;
To fall or return?
The abdication of reign to rain.

Cheerful youth and rushing suits,
Cool wasps as raindrops.
Imber silence ember.

Of that which I am,
I will fall.
To kill is not to damn,
To deliver to the all.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
15 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
It is one piece. I dunno what to tell you, it's supposed to be unorthodox.
Ha! Good try Mr. Angst but I've only posted this one other time at the end of a dying thread.

It's interesting to earn such venom for merely employing an approach that conflicts with your preference. It'd be prudent to figure out what you're overcompensating for. Though, if your patronizing tone is any indication, I'm sure you already consider yourself perfectly self aware.
I'd like to hear what your opinion is.
I woke up this morning to find myself missing
Something that should have been there.
At first it was subtle and then I realised
All of a sudden I just didn't care.
I thought back to last night
then with a start
Shock filled my brain.
And suddenly I remembered
my 'Significant Other' pain.
I leapt up with a shout
My heart full of glee
And in my mind's eye
Kissed goodbye to a Banshee.
And yet then I turned,
And Surveyed my domain

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
File: attention seeking.png (27 KB, 906x465)
27 KB
Can I ask what's wrong with it?

Saved. Wonderful work, Anon
Of that encrusting passion,
endurance only,
to the lost;
where once her gaze,
froze that pedestal heart;
on sojourn call,
hark! and that,
frigid plain,
foamy and rife,
abreast of fear,
and of strife;

such quality, only to tempt,
lemnian recourse;

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: image.jpg (50 KB, 330x499)
50 KB
Has anyone actually read this or any of her other works?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
is there any merit in popular politicians' books at all? by figureheads of any party/political affiliation. i always thought that the non-academic books were just cashing in on the fame in a "dignified" way
youre probably right about cashing in. they are for the human cattle who watch all the shows and know all the names and believe everything they hear if it suits their biases. my parents have a load of them in from politicians, show hosts, and pundits, but they are still pretty dumb from what I can tell.
>popular politicians
They cannot afford to be authentic.
Only the underdogs could possibly write books that could shake the fundaments of society.
File: 1478393053034.png (316 KB, 435x320)
316 KB
316 KB PNG

File: Cthulhu.jpg (80 KB, 800x600)
80 KB
So, i bought a Kindle, downloaded everything from lovecraft and now i don't know where to go. Can you reccomend me the best occult/horror/mystery books you know. Anything with a sense of a bigger darker meaning goes too.
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
Thanks a lot man, that'sounds a really quality reply. Will check everything out, Thomas Ligotti sounds really interesting
Fucking autocorrect.

the king in yellow
also search lovecraft contemporaries (i cant remember their names)
>downloaded everything from lovecraft

I'm so sorry.
He totally is because despite being dense stuff the man has a really eloquent narrative voice. You might not have a clue of what he is saying but his words will grab you regardless.

If you want something more in the vein of Lovecraft check out Clark Ashton Smith, personal friend of Lovecraft and writer of some great tales too. There's also Laird Barron who is pretty much the poster boy for modern "weird fiction" and has even been called the new Lovecraft. I don't think his stuff is THAT good but you might like it.

This too, although just the first four stories, the rest is romantic drivel.

File: juK4FuTl.jpg (55 KB, 512x512)
55 KB
I've tried to get into his videos but his analysis are so surface level and brief. I wonder if he is actually even reading them.
87 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
Love this guy, seems smart
no way, he looks at least 35-40
>at first he kept pretending to be tired
My God you nailed it.
The only reason to make fun of Cliff is because he dresses and acts self-absorbed slacker and thinks it is a perfectly acceptable excuse for a personality. His summaries are fine if you haven't heard of the book and are looking for recs that are similar to his taste. Otherwise, if you're looking for a University level analysis what the hell are you doing on YouTube?
Having read most of the books he reviews, his reviews are terrible. It seems like he read the wiki page and some goodreads quotes, but not the novels themselves. Motherfucker seems to care a lot more about how his clothes look than about literature whatsoever. The type of guy who spends hours shaving his chest and deliberately making himself look like he has a perpetual 5 o'clock shadow

File: 1460762735221.png (660 KB, 1106x1012)
660 KB
660 KB PNG
>/lit/ loves Christianity now
What in Dawkins' name happened?
44 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>I don't believe in God. I wish I could do the leap of faith, since I am despairing.
I'm in the boat buddy.
I've often felt that Kierkegaard protested too much. It's not a matter of a leap of faith, a Herculean effort on the part of the believer. It's a matter of seeking out and being open to God acting in your life.
How am I supposed to get sky cake after I die if you're over here talking about sky fudge?
It's quite Herculean if you simply don't believe (maybe even can't believe) in the supernatural.
man is only a vessel, so that fudge may be.

File: 1476832995314.jpg (52 KB, 540x536)
52 KB
It's a six word story thread.
197 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
However, the reverse is also true.
State-sanctioned murder is nothing new.
File: my days off.gif (911 KB, 422x585)
911 KB
911 KB GIF
I never knew bedbugs caused psychosis.
File: 1410654077736.jpg (34 KB, 439x656)
34 KB
Wish I had friends, oh well.
Booby traps trap traps with boobs

File: nietzsche.jpg (28 KB, 470x350)
28 KB
Thoughts on Nietzsche?
17 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Someone surely doesn't know what overcompensating means.
I actually reccomend starting at Jazz. It's a bit simple, but the conclusion really puts the whole work into perspective.
The man had some serious pipes
>says Nietzsche
>posts Bowie
Nietzsche and Liberace got all the bitches

File: 20161202_185621.jpg (258 KB, 568x800)
258 KB
258 KB JPG
Describe your writing style
21 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
Zero affect
File: 1480538731217.jpg (759 KB, 2638x2171)
759 KB
759 KB JPG
Trump wanted to pick Gov. Kreme Krispie, but the GOP made him pick Pence. It's well documented.

Just about everyone Trump has selected has been a swampy GOP cretin.
>Listening to the MSM
He's going to need to employ someone to drain the swamp, there is a danger to employing the goblins who live there for the task but on the other hand you don't want someone who has never been in it to help you navigate it either.
This could be the title of a poetry or short story collection.
It makes sense for the title of something to describe it's contents

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.