[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Settings Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: James Portnow.jpg (10 KB, 320x320)
10 KB
>Q: Why aren't there sources listed on Extra History?

>The reason we have a "Lies" episode in most Extra History series is to remind us all that there is more to every story, and that no one source of information is ever infallible.
>Extra History is first and foremost an entertaining "pop history" show, intended to spark discussion and introduce viewers to a topic they otherwise may never learn about. We encourage you to find your own sources, and maybe challenge our interpretation of events.
>When people realize that there is no such thing as truth-from-on-high and come together to discuss their differing viewpoints on history, that's when it really gets fun!
>If you can find one book on the subject (even if it's just from a Google search), you're already off to a good start. Turn to the bibliography section of that book and you'll find a treasure trove of recommendations.
>Happy hunting!
Extra credits a cute
Death to all Jews.
I just can't stand the pitch shifted narration.
for what reason

more than can be reasonably listed

File: 1523596597059.png (114 KB, 300x300)
114 KB
114 KB PNG
I've been wondering for a while
Why does every living organism have the same basic instinct of surivival in the physical world? Like what is the end goal, why would we have this coded inside our DNA and what is the point of it? Why is the point of survival just trying to please that one instinct?
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
All life are drones to continue DNA thats it.
Yes but why? What's the point of continuing DNA? It all seems pointless to me, to keep living for an instinct that we're not even sure why we have it in the first place
>inb4 we have that instinct to survive and we survive because we have that instinct
If this is life to its most basic definition then it all seems like a pointless loop to me
There is no point slave.

Struggling for survival/competing to have offspring isn't a rational behaviour of chemical elements, electric impulses in brains and nervous systems or whatever you wan to call "instincts", but it's more of an accidental behaviour of all things alive that MAKE them alive, and without which they could not be.
Life in itself is an accident as much as it is a miracle. Living organisms are hardcoded with the function to pass on their genetic structure into some form of offsprings, which they inherited from their ancestors.

Consider «life» as this mysterious relay baton that knows only that it must keep on advancing, and for that purposes crafts runners capable of generating more runners to carry you before they are no longer able to run themselves.
life is a mistake and we're just prolonging that mistake
deal with it or kys OP

File: download.jpg (8 KB, 259x194)
8 KB
So, I think this is the right place for this, since it's technically a humanities issue.

I got into a minor disagreement with an acquaintance over the technical implications of innocent until proven guilty. My acquaintance says that being found not guilty is not the same as being found innocent, and that this is an important legal distinction

My assertion is that, as a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, finding someone not guilty is the same as admitting their innocence, even if the jury doesn't want to admit that, and that dancing around it is just a form of blame shifting. At least, as it pertains to the matters the individual is currently charged with. Whether or not someone is innocent in a more cosmic sense is obviously beyond the purview of this discussion.

They basically got fed up with me and said I wasn't listening, which upset me a little because I see it as simple legal arithmetic. If innocent u til proven guilty, then not guilty = innocent, in the context of the current charges.

17 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I'm gonna ignore the big government stuff, that's an American problem unrelated to the general criminal law.

The Anglo-American rule since the 18th century has been that it's better for ten guilty people to go free than one innocent person to suffer. That's Blackstone's formulation, which is based on the Bible at least in part. Read Genesis 18: God would not destroy Sodom for the sake of ten righteous men because "the Judge of all the earth should do right."

So killing even a small number of the innocent is itself a crime. How will you prevent your system doing that without trials?
File: 1524107576805.jpg (67 KB, 500x716)
67 KB
David Clark and Joe Arpaio wouldn't agree with giving Judges the ability to execute people on a whim.
Lawyer fag here. You are correct. Within the law it is a simple concept. Not guilty means the person did not commit the crime in the eyes of the court. If that person is actually guilty or not remains to be seen but for all intents and purposes they are innocent within society.
Yeah, because what could go wrong?
It is known that if you give someone power to excecute people without giving them a trial, providing proof etc. they will start to abuse it.
I just don't like big government and big judges who are hired by big govt in which the liberal judges vote for marxist programs and liberal policies.

File: HAHAHAHA.png (340 KB, 1100x1252)
340 KB
340 KB PNG

Why is the Roman Empire so shilled again when the landmass they controlled pales in comparison to other civs?
>Beaten by Mongols
>Beaten by Slavs
>Beaten by Portuguese
>Beaten by Brazil (UMA DELICIA)
>Beaten by T*rks
>Beaten by Chinks
>Beaten by French
>BARELY larger than the Tibetan Empire
22 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
What is wrong or innacurate of this?
Irans population is 80 million 20 million in 1950
Italys pop is 60 million
20 million in 1950
Approx 10 million or so in ancient times
According to my own arbitrary calculations they had at least 1 billion people. What is wrong or inaccurate of this?
>In terms of duration: the Romans/Byzantines and Persians/Iranians are the best.
Never underestimate Romanboo and Perisaboo's coping mechanism.
Irans popukation was 20 million in 1950.
And Persia's population in the late 5th century was 1 billion.

File: His_wojak.png (218 KB, 680x818)
218 KB
218 KB PNG
Poll link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12gcqBJ0YjeuBT5pccxq7Hyjcw9Of6HCZBihvrEp9Fts

If you are new to all this and have NO idea what this whole thing is all about, go here - implyingrigged.info/wiki/FAQ

For information about the team, go here - implyingrigged.info/wiki//his/

Teams discord server - https://discord.gg/842Jf8Z

Also team discussion thread
13 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: 1517880530170.jpg (107 KB, 776x851)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
That or the DDR anthem for triggering https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1CyPjQQTAM

&humanities should have some proper representation.
>most people enjoying the thread
>reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee it's not what i like fuck off
Now this is the kind of high octane autism I can get behind.

We really have to beat /pol/, they're the cancer killing /his/
>We really have to beat /pol/, they're the cancer killing /his/

A pregnant Anne Frank porn thread stayed up for nearly eight hours yesterday with 200+ posts before (((mods))) nuked it.
/pol/ is elite, /his/ is stuck in babbies.

Childhood is supporting Japan. Adulthood is supporting anarchist Korea.

Enlightenment is realizing imperial China is the one true Hegemon of East Asia.
>autonomous anarchist zone
lmao they really didn't want to write it down as yet another state huh?
Transcendence is supporting Ping from your local takeout by buying sweet and sour chicken off him every week

File: hinduismus.png (544 KB, 650x387)
544 KB
544 KB PNG
Tell me everything about Hinduism

If you're mentally ill and want to post pooinlooxddd to stroke your fragile ego please make your own thread
not op but i want to learn more about it, its a generally interesting subject
It's the oldest known religion I think
No, it's the oldest religion still in practice.

File: download (1).png (5 KB, 344x146)
5 KB
Believes in evolution, "decides" not to have children. Somehow this isnt apart of natural selection
Evolution is a garbage theory
it could be argued that if you make the conscious choice to not have children it would be artificial selection. Natural selection is more like not being able to breed against your will.

Still evolution though.
what a shit thread
no u

File: quine.jpg (28 KB, 450x450)
28 KB
>*destroys epistemology*

Hehehe nothing personal kid
1 reply and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
File: brüno.jpg (368 KB, 1200x2186)
368 KB
368 KB JPG
*saves epistemology from itself*
thank me in the future, parochials
delet this heretic
>*destroys batters*

heh nothing personnel kid

File: file.png (317 KB, 644x322)
317 KB
317 KB PNG
Who was right?

they both had a few good points that could have been stated in 10 minutes then spent 2 hours repeating themselves
The one that doesn't sound like a cuck.
Honestly why are all liberals such weak fucking manlets.

Why should I recognize two ugly men?
File: file.png (156 KB, 1028x339)
156 KB
156 KB PNG
Didn't even know this board existed desu

File: john-searle.jpg (33 KB, 620x340)
33 KB
Is he the final boss of philosophy?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
File: freud s.jpg (84 KB, 900x750)
84 KB
He is.
shitposting ironically is still shitposting
Buddy, Searle isn’t even closest to final boss status just among famous analytic thinkers. David Lewis, Putnam, and Kripke are all head and shoulders better than Searle.

Though I’d argue Wilfred Sellers is really the analytic final boss.
On the continental side there is new final boss every year, a decade ago it was Deleuze, and then Badiou, and how it’s Laurelle. Things move fast there.
File: jacques-derrida-2.jpg (67 KB, 900x750)
67 KB
>On the continental side there is new final boss every year
pls kiddo
Inb4 me love you long time

File: Raffael 040 (crop).jpg (425 KB, 642x948)
425 KB
425 KB JPG
Why couldn't he just let them translate the Bible
28 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
Latin is the language spoken in Heaven.

The original Hebrew text is all that matters, Jews had it right from the beginning; if only the Greeks didn't force a flawed translation into their language we wouldn't have such insane misunderstandings of the scriptures we have today

Jewry has a strict set of guidelines to maintain domination.
There were at least eighteen complete German Bible editions, ninety editions in the vernacular of the Gospels and the readings of the Sundays and Holy Days, and some fourteen German Psalters by the time Luther first published his own New Testament translation you uneducated prot

File: HitlerPainting.jpg (468 KB, 722x728)
468 KB
468 KB JPG
I know about the dinner-talks of Hitler.
But if he wasnt really a christian then home come he
>Made a painting of the Virgin Mary and Jesus?
>Wrote tons of positive things about Christianity and his faith in his private book "mein kampf"?
>Made countless positive statements about Jesus/Christianity in his speeches even AFTER he was put into power?
(Thus, he didnt do it just to get christian votes in the elections)
>Built over 200 new churches in Germany?
16 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>the picture literally uses the cultural marxism meme

holy fuck, retarded bait.
agnostic would be a more correct answer imo.

If he's religious then racemixing should've never be a problem.
Because they're trying to cozy up with Christians (particularly evangelical zionists). They get a lot of money and political support from them.
Hitler was more of an islamic kinda guy

Hitler was a Catholic, born and raised.

Catholics are not Christians.

File: 1482782264207.jpg (142 KB, 600x742)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
4 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.

The stirrup do you mean?
He's riding a horse
File: Army.png (369 KB, 680x680)
369 KB
369 KB PNG
File: WOE TO DRVNKARDS.png (637 KB, 796x1224)
637 KB
637 KB PNG
Oh fuck now I see it, thanks Anons.

File: PositiverGott.jpg (64 KB, 591x775)
64 KB
Tell me about this religion of the SS.
Did they have an actual theology beyond God exists?
How do they deduce their teachings from the belief? How was for example pic rel authorative for how to behave as a Gottgläubiger.
Was it Platonism or was it larp?
How serious did Gottgläubige take it or was it more a social statement?
unironically best semi-religion, with no religious dogma bullshit, you just needed to accept there is something bigger than yourself, thats all
>you just needed to accept there is something bigger than yourself, thats all
like AA's 12 step program?
How does this help you walk into the line of fire?
How does this make an SS man care about putting his race above him?
you missed the point and the movement was only a replacement for religions they precieved as unaryan although it wasnt propagated outside of the ss, gonna leave this thread b4 it becomes another holocaust debate desu
No I get it and I'm not a naziaboo. But if the religion doesn't offer you anything for your death I'd be surprised it would be propagated to soldiers

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.