Previously: >>8315060The cartoony side: >>8319401No DALL-E generated stuff.>GuidesGeneral: github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki | rentry.org/sdg-link | rentry.org/rentrysdHires Fix: rentry.org/hiresfixjan23Inpainting/Outpainting: rentry.org/drfar | rentry.org/inpainting-guide-SDAnimation: rentry.org/AnimAnonCreate LoRAs, TIs: rentry.org/59xed3 | rentry.org/simplified-embed-trainingList of models/LoRAs:rentry.org/acorepo>Auto1111 extensionsControlNet: github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet | rentry.org/dummycontrolnetRegional Prompter: github.com/hako-mikan/sd-webui-regional-prompterTag autocomplete: github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete>Related>>>/b/degen>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/vg/aids>>>/vt/vtai
>>8328842Dude, post some pics or the thread might get culled.
>>8328883sorry got distractedam not regular baker, will have dump ready next time
>>8328896I understand, it happens, it was just some adive because that has happened before in the blink of an eye.>>8328903Really digging this one.
>>8329002better kayas lined up in the pipeline already, need to finetune my lora settings
after some testing, zonkey is the go-to pony realistic model for good shadow, hard to tune, but good results
>>8328893That's really good. Model/prompt?
Steinfeld is goated
>>8329123agreed, due to all the “details” zonkey adds I had to turn the add-details-xl lora way down. switched back to pony realism since I’m going for a “covered in freckles” look that zonkey couldnt quite seem to pull off
>>8329236is add-details any good for better skin? I ran some tests with detailerlora and that was really disappointing
>>8329246for skin I really like the Freckles and Skin XL lora, I think it goes light on freckles if you just prompt the “natural skin” keyword. iiuc, add-detail-xl adds some noise to the initial steps that diffuse into more details as it progresses, which can help with skin detail depending on the model but isnt directly tied to more realistic skin.
>This gym is for Congress officials only, what are you doing here?
>>8329466Are you the guy using a website that doesn't support loras?
>>8329498No, I'm pretty new to this whole thing
>>8329524not bad gens for a newbieyou gotta use a LoRA of her though
>>8329123What are you doing for upscaling? everything I tried to do with zonkey turned it into nasty blobs even though it looked pretty good at initial gen size.
>>8329535I'm using one but still figuring out everything. Pretty inconsistent but I don't mind her looking like a generic latina either
>>8329561Which LoRA is it? It looks like an embedding actually (really small files, usually bad likeness). If you change the weight, does it have any effect?Maybe you picked the wrong one and it's not compatible with your model and silently ignored. What we are seeing then is what the base model thinks she looks like>>8329478This should look more like the picYour gens look like what it makes during the first few steps of the gen. Really smooth, young looking face which is missing the important features
>>8329596I downloaded some random one on civitai but I think it got removed, and I definitely see what you mean with the smoothness, it takes some effort to get more of her features but again I don't mind
>>8329596This is one I did of Tara Strong for a /co/ thread, seemed easier
>>8329640yeah she looks basically like a super cute young version of her, maybe a younger sisterbarely recognizable but still good looking loras like that are good for making consistent rando charactersalso I'm making a note of the rock climbing theme to use for later, very creative>>8329663maybe missing something in the negative prompt to get a better face (the eye asymmetry is a giveaway)
>>8328512which model/lora is this anon?
>>8329778realismenginexl, it's an img2img of a 3d render
>>8329824are you a wizard in blender or is there a tool to make these renders for you?
>>8329461summertime saga?
>>8329859>>8329864>black dots on those white shirtsyou prompted for cows didn't ya?
>>8329890I make them myself, the base image itself isn't too complicated, just enough to set up the pose and lighting
>>8329824thanks!
>>8330001it was freckles
still trying to find the fine line between expressions, randomness in facial structure, freckles, and general fuckability
>>8330435and remembering to add the picture
that's not quite a banana but good try
alternating steps with [facial_expression1|facial_expression2] is causing wierd artifacts sometimes
and keep trying on the upside-down high heels
"collar" will often create a leash even if unprompted, might have to stick to "black leather choker" or something similar
>>8330442yeah I haven't found good use for that syntax yetalternating between clothes and nudity can sometimes give you extra skimpification but it's real fragilefor more interesting faces, I like to use different facial expressions in the base gen versus the adetailer face promptif the denoising strength is in a sweet spot, the adetailer run has to incorporate the first expression into the result somehowif expressions are a bit randomized (dynamic prompts/wildcards), you never ever end up with exactly the same face twice
>>8330462sure... I get great use out of it for certain tints and highlighted hair like[(ginger hair:{0.4|0.6|0.8})|(red hair:{1|1.2|1.4})|(orange hair:{1.2|1.4|1.6})]in 1.5 / XL it was the best way I found to blend celeb faces, I felt like almost every single face was attractive. The right part of the OP pic is about as close as I've gotten to what I'm looking for, but even when using that exact same face prompt for different locations/poses it doesn't look like the same type of face
>>8330486and those goddamn big freckle clumps< here's an example of a gen where SD just decides "fuck everything you told me about sharp focus and high resolution and detailed freckled skin, using the exact same loras and prompting as other gens that have detail - here's this shit"
>>8329559seconding this question; i'm having a lot of trouble upscaling Zonkey, partially due to OOM errors and partially due to me not knowing what i'm doing
just went on a nostalgia browse of old 1.5 folders... now I need to purge like 99% of it, everything looks so plastic now
>>8330524i deleted my entire 1.5 coom directory in a fit of pique and felt a great karmic debt lifted. unironically this might be having some effect in the spirit realm
>>8330529the suddenly unallocated sectors on your drive suddenly freed for higher purposes contributed to the delay of the heat death of the universe< base XL had almost no hardcore without using pose loras or control net, I always got either legs and cock with no head or torso, or disembodied floating penises
but I loved the XL faces
>>8330561>>8330565and it was so rare to get redhead pubes, or even pubes at all, even with heavy weighting, and as we all know redheads are better with pubes
I need a new model idea or people are going to think I'm obsessed with this bitch
Whoever did Emma Watson in the previous thread, can you do a 34 year old Emma with small saggy tits, and extremely hairy forearms and happy trail please?
>>8330804Oh yeah and if it's SFW even better so I can post her on /tv/, thank you.
Hpw do i avoid samefce on Ponyrealism?
>>8329559>>8330520Something like thisfor the Vram issue, im using forge, with is a custom version of A1111 wich have a fantastic Vram management
>>8330849gorgeous!Can u share prompt?
>>8330970appreciate you.
>>8330991Surehttps://files.catbox.moe/t9x1js.png
I have literally never posted here, but I'm here to tell you faggots that I'm training something that might interest you
>>8331137Emilia Clarke doing weird sexual stuff to ScarJo? :)))
>>8330970After you make an image with this, what's the peak VRAM usage? (values under the image A: R: Sys:)
Outside Louis Rossman has anyone else giving general permission for AI generation using their image? I am testing PuLID and am tired of just looping something I created.
>>8331311Unlikely. You can always use someone whose image is in the public domain, ie someone that has been dead for over 70 yers.
Whoever is that retard posting a bunch of not AOC stuff, just stop It's so far from looking like her it is ass
>>8331375it's so far off that it's basically a rando charactercurb your autism
>>8331311aella lol
>>8331375the magic of Forge
>>8331420>>8331374Sorry wrong reply
>>8331269Sorry im retard i dont know how to use 4chan see image above
>>8331420I'm gonna have to give forge a try. I'm running out with 12GB all the time. That's even with low-vram mode (which shouldn't be needed with such a card)
>>8331453if you're using a1111 the switch to forge is game-changing and extremely simple
>>8330849I've been fighting it for a while. right now I've got a few XL celeb loras at mid weight, either just one or alternating between two each step, with wildcard facial expressions/"beauty" adjectives/weightings. not 100% perfect but it helps. another anon mentioned using a higher weight celeb lora in the adetailer prompt, but since wildcards don't work in that prompt and I try to steer away from hardcoding I haven't tested it much< this one for example, I wouldnt normally upscale because of the fingers and pussy, but this was like a 0.8 emilia clarke gen>>8330438I remember this one was "young britney spears"
>>8331469And it's even easier if you use stability matrix that joins all your loras, models, in a "global installation".100% recommended
>>8331482wildcards and all other dynamic prompt features do work in the adetailer promptwhat doesn't work is the fact they won't match up in the random parts (unless using cyclic) and you can't use variables set in the main prompt in an adetailer prompt either (there's a bug report that went nowhere)for the alternation syntax, you can also specify more than two for even more tweakingalso do something like [one|one|two] so it sees the second one only every third step
>>8330849>>8331482I just had an idea. Maybe this is a good use case for ancestral samplers. You can specify a different sampler for an adetailer tab no problemThe ancestral ones (those ending in " a") are non-converging. That is, if you regen the same seed with one extra step for instance it will still make modifications instead of looking "better". It doesn't beeline for a single target image, instead it "circles" around some target.Bad to use for an image in general, but might help break the monotonic faces. Could also help for freckles. The idea is that the normal samplers are converging to something that is washed out/blurry and these sampler might not.
>>8331482The LoRAs are always active, you are just switching the keywordsWhat happens when you just invoke all the keywords at once? You can finetune their weights individually (unless they use the same, sks woman etc.)You won't get multiple persons this way. The CLIP interrogator regularly spits out multiple persons names to describe a single one tooRemember the AI doesn't know what a person is. A name or LoRA keyword is just another attribute that you can all use together like "tall,thin,attractive" etc.I regularly mix in the representation of a celeb in the checkpoint together with the LoRA keyword to increase likeness.
>>8331374dead person for the win. Thanks.>>8331394That is a bag of crazy I didn't need to open. >>8331453https://github.com/lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge?tab=readme-ov-file#forge-backendJust a heads up about those flags.
>>8331392Curb your retardation
I just like latinas
thanks for the face advice guys, need to do some more tweaking - in the meantime I have a temporary fix
>>8331375beggars can't be choosersif you actually want AOC, that's the worst way possible to make a request here>>8331869>>8331871>>8332087cool stuff>>8331997I see a pattern here today>>8332113perfect. did you prompt for transparent clothes? never seen them with wetness before, wow
"Anon... We need to talk about your grades lately."
>>8332355realistic loli are CP you sick fuck
>>8331375this is why celeb posting should be discouraged>>8330970thank you!
>>8330970yea i'm in forge but i oom with these settings, this in unique to Zonkey and i can upscale much bigger with other XL models
>>8332749instead of giving out posting advice, try genning some bondage that isn't shit for a changeI remember your stuff from a few threads back with the three girls in crappy restraints
>>8332764zonkey is always more VRAM hungry for some reasonit looks really good with another realistic pony model as a refinerI wonder if that step can be skipped and using img2img latent upscale in its placethen zonkey VRAM on upscale wouldn't be an issue since the other model will be used for thatnot sure if that compromises quality. also a manual process
>>8332773ok make a request then
>>8332181pony [realism] uses danbooru tags, so things like "see-through [clothing]" and "transparent [clothing]" work well, "wet" tends to cover the skin in running water if you aren't careful with the weight. I also use "covered [body part]" for fabric over nipples/pussy etc with the outlines poking through, like >>8332113
Something about AI armpits is just perfect, and I've never really been into them before
>>8333675
>>8333675>>8333707More like Pooters
>>8333135Looks like you're using "face restore". Don't. It'll compromise the likeness considerably.
>>8333720
>>8333737Loving it, any chance you can add some redness or a hand print?
>>8333751like this? (first time doing this)
>>8333787Good start
New testing with zonkey, what do u think guys?
>>8331997how much vram do you have, you focking bastard
>>8328842where do i post similar pictures, here or in /d/, i don't understand. /d/ has more futa, but cartoonish, here is more photoreal, but almost no futa
>>8333966is long as it's realistic, I'd say go for itthere's lots of stuff that would belong here but isn't in the thread, there's just not enough people genningjust no realistic loli, cause that's outright CP
>>8333976ok
>>8333966>>>/d/ or some dedicated futa thread.
>>8334006dedicated celeb thread first
>>8334028>>8334035>>8334053>>8334065>when you order Daisy Ridley on Wish
>>8333941My vote goes to hiresfix+adetailer.Personally the only adetailer i use on zonkey is mediapipe_face_mesh_eyes_only.
>>8333966/aco/ is /d/-lite.Just look at the catalog.
>>8333734You are correct, I guess I still have a lot to mess with in the settings.Also, I know this ain't a democracy but I vote NO to futa stuff. Otherwise I'm going to have to generate a lot more non-futa to post
>>8334461same. once you let in the futa, other futa users start posting, then the topic is basically only futa, then the furries come in, then the original topic is non existent
In a sense, the futa stuff is pushing the boundaries on the "realistic" part.There are occasional monster tits and sometimes a monster cock here. But the only major theme that connects all the different styles is that we depict roughly normal looking people (and occasionally a fairy).A beautiful woman with a penis is just an inch away from strapon femdom and wouldn't bother me that muchBut horns and tails creatures are a bit too far
A revisit of one from the last thread with everything I've been learning. Wet hair is very tricky to prompt and look decent
>>8334573looks greatyou messed up in the upscaling thoughlooking at that pic at 100% zoom and it's blurry
>>8334559Dude, take it to any other futa thread already on this board.
>>8334628>barely recognizable kaya>barely realistic, looks drawnyou are the expert on what belongs here!
>>8334603Yeah, I've been kind of using the slight blur to cover up some masking and AI jank in the detail. I'll keep playing with it.>>8334628I like this style, but I don't know who Kaya is.
>>8334603Forgot to post one with a much sharper upscale
>>8332181Shut up retard
>>8332788Request goes on request board retard
>>8334469This isn't /b/, if people post furry here you can just report it.
>>8334461Funny that AOC fag tried to vote on no futaAOC is turbo retard left who would vote to turn all men into futa irl
>>8334649epicyou sure you're new to this>>8334666this is the right answer. there is no slippery slope
>>8334667My brother in Christ, you seem to be suffering from political brainrot. AOC would not appreciate me creating fake images of her to jack off to and share them, who cares what she thinks?>>8334707I'm familiar with photo editing and had been playing around with some other AI stuff, but believe me my early gens were pretty rough
>>8334748What can be done with inpainting now in minutes took me literally hours in GIMP before. And the technology is still in its infancy when you think about it.That guy who calls people names is off his meds. Never provides any arguments. Only tries to discourage people from genning. And thinks that throwing insults around on an anonymous image board does anything. Just some pathetic nogen loser.
>>8334212You must learn to accept Dollar Store Daisy into your heart.
>You interrupted my workout again... But your form is good, maybe you can spot me next timeWe're dialing it in
>>8334894maybe a sports bra can help
QUAD JUMPAH
>>8335164Daisy head looks bigger compared to her body on all pictures but Carie Fischer is very good. Can you do this with Emila Clarke
>>8334748But you're not making any AOC fakesJust some dog faced latina
giwtwm
>>8335378botched upscale again
>>8332706Just checked the archive. Are you fucking retarded?
>>8335403what's the argument? "CP was always posted here, so it's ok"?the thread is for realistic gens. if you post pictures of naked kids, kindly rope yourself
>>8334957She sweats through everything anyway
So the troll who calls people retard in every single post is a kid fuckerWho is surprised
>>8332706Well there are no real children so its not CP its just weird
>>8335535AI generated pornography is pornography. So when it has kids in it, well then guess what kind of pornography that is?No gray area like for anime since it's generated to look photo realistic.
>>8335545you are gay
>>8335545There are not real people or children involved in CGI, technically its not pornography, you are not taking videos or pics of real people its just weird CGI , those in the pics doesn't exist in real life
>>8335545>>8335563really real true facts incoming:it's considered "obscenity" (and therefore not covered by the first amendment) if it's>devoid of artistic merit>appeals to the purient interest (read: makes you horny)and it's considered CP if it's indistinguishable from the real thing to the average "reasonable person". And a quick scroll through *any* political debate on the internet should tell you that the average "reasonable person" in 2024 is a goddamn retard.tl;dr: gen whatever you want but maybe try not to be a fucking idiot about what you post on the largest english-language imageboard on the entire web.
>>8334007some more i made today
>>8335657
>>8335659
>>8335660
>>83354531. that wasn't a loli2. it wasn't realistic, it was cg at bestyou are retarded
hitting a cosmic ideal of "Zendaya or at least close enough", "beehive hair", a retro-ish kitchen, and "fingers aren't visible". Feel free to complain that I intentionally made her tits too big.
>>8335563>>8335560You people are idiots. This guy has it right >>8335628Fucking delusional pedos.
im going to be 100% honest. this thread is amazing as fuck and the dalle thread have been dead all year. this will be THE thread until its not
>all these famous women's gens>no Greta.
>>8336224Never heard of her.
>>8335659>>8335660>>8335661Those are amazing. Make sure to show these to >>8331732>>8336082always point out what you likethere are too many amazing gens without a single replythe genners need to know what's popular>>8336224as this thread gets more popular, we are going to have to have request anchors
>>8336246/pol/ says hi! ;^]>>8336284fair point - there's probably a gen bred on /r/ but I just thought it was worth a mention, if we can have aoc, daisy and Emma why not Greta?At least I'm not the cunt who kept asking for Emilia Clarke.
>>8336290Because that ugly swedish muppet is a magnet for poltards, so take that back to /b/. This tread is already turning into a shitfest.
tentacle gens are interesting. extremely hard to find one without little errors, and it seems to only want to use large bolt-on tits for things like "tentacle boob squeeze"
once again, not a banana
>>8336529Interesting results non the less, bit more worrisome the fail with banana.
It's a beautiful morning to gen>>8336536>>8336539>>8336541I really like the skin texture here>>8336739For this kind of room did you prompt more for "dark room" or "mood light" because I can't get rooms dark enough
>>8336536>>8336537>>8336539>>8336541you got your face mojo back -- no more dead doll's eyesbravo>>8336850NTA but haven't found a silver bullet for dark shots yetI think the problem is that photography style prompts are implying a well lit shotdarkest I got yet were by using "dark" adjective when describing the roomsome strange results with "ethereal lighting, soft and otherworldly light"would probably help to feed dark room shots into the CLIP interrogator to learn the vocabulary that SD associates with the desired lighting
>>8328883>>8334006>>8336445You should try making Maisie, Greta or some other goblinaAll your celebs look like goblins anyways, you should excel at these
>>8335485You've got people mixed up or you're just projectingFucking retard
>>8337387just make tripcode alreadyit's easier than typing your signature each time
>Look, I'm all about inclusive, diverse spaces... But whenever you're here I can feel you staring at me the whole time
>Stop drooling for a second and help me keep my back straight here
>How does this look? Think I can go deeper?
new to this hope u like
>>8337391Fuck off retard
>>8337464another, i have alot of older ones i made from dalle, still getting used to this new one
>>8337470I like this one, is it SD or DALL-E?
>>8337475dalle before it the whole taylor swift fag ruining it. i have tons more if you want, i know this isnt the right thread though
>>8337482You don't need to dump it if you don't want, I just want to emulate that dirty film look. I don't know what the hell kind of non-euclidean geometry is going on, I guess the backseat of a car is harder than it seems
>>8337482if you get a VPN to china you can get uncensored dalle again right now if you really want (cici)>>8337507yeah SD has trouble with tight spaces (or rather, the checkpoints have)car interior, trunk, elevators... sometimes there is a LoRA available (like for elevators)needs img2img/controlnet if you really want itof course with that technique you can do almost anything anyways
more nat
>>8337690This is Bing dall-e you idiot
8337482already said that. posting more nat anyway now..
>>8337733don't do a dump of dalle generated stuff herethat's not allowed (it's in the OP come on)the dalle thread would love to reminisce about those I'm sure
>>8337733more nat
>>8337733>>8337837over there >>8337276
need a good sdxl/pony cleave gag lora or something. holes not stuffed enough
>>8333966>>8333981>>8333985>>8333990>>8333995Nice gens, keep them
>>8338652*coming, what models and quality tags are u using? Your gens look a bit much like a 3d render
>>8338348like this?
>>8336739Not bad looking, but you forgot to set a photography styleIt's basically a photo realistic render or painting and the realistic checkpoints somehow default to thisCan get some really interesting results if you take it further in that direction
>>8338396plaplpalaplap get.... pregnant?
>>8338736Comparison example render vs. photo styleAlso fuck Fooocus for including so many shit tags in their style promptsPrompting is hard enough to learn and Fooocus is supposed to be easy for beginners, but boy they seem to have no idea what they're doing
>>8338736>>8338823That pic was from archive, but the point you make it´s extremely important. Tokens like 8k probably are superstition, but others will make small, subte yet impactful changes .
>>8337733Bro this is good quality content, it has no place here
>>8338835I think 8k actually does something to increase details, but haven't checked closelyCombinatorial generation gives lots of clues but it's tiresomeShit like "vintage, shot on kodak" alters body types, fucking what (Fooocus Photography)50mm, 75mm lenses and other camera stuff is supposed to make people look different (especially faces), but that shit goes too far>>8338836Really surprised how good dalle used to be, now there's cici at leastBut don't be a smart ass and take it to the right thread"dalle bros" always lose their shit whenever SD is even mentioned, so you can kindly fuck right off
>>83388448k I think is mosty cargo cult, doubt there was enough of that in the datasets to affect. On the other hand vintage and shot on kodak probably did, moving the balance more to point and click, not-that-well thought out photography, that would clash with the more refined profesional compositions we want. And specifing lenses probably goes full on the other way.
>>8338860Sometimes you can't tell a difference since what the tag you're adding would provide is already specified by other tags or LoRA anywaysPrompt without any style: add "8k" and you see big improvementPrompt with photo/realistic style: adding "8k" won't change muchUnfortunately we cannot search the dataset anymore to see what was tagged in which way. They took all that down due to including problematic images by accident I think.So it's all trial and error. And since the diffusion process is random, there is confirmation bias and cargo culting to worry about
>>8338883Yeah. Concurring on all points.
just use prompt S/R on XYZ to see if "8k" have any effects on the image
Can AI generate a circumcised cock or are they all going to be uncut?
>>8338930there are some blowjob POV LoRAs for XL on civitai that look like wrapped sausages
>>8338930have you tried "shriveled glans", "scarred penis" or "jewish man"?
>>8330154Mind sharing an example of an input image? Was wondering how many polys you are using/if any textures. Seems like a sick workflow for control but time consuming
>>8336536Mmm is this Zonkey? Always struggle with detailed skin so catbox would be much appreciated
>>8338883Yeah I've tried copy+pasting prompts directly from Civitai and I get noticeably more generic outputs than me just using a few prompts, using ones without loras of course. I still put 8K in sometimes, but I have not noticed any real difference.>>8338736NTA, what do you mean photography style? Like just include that in the prompt?
>>8339082Yeah so SD always needs to know if it should make a photo, a render, painting, drawing, concept art, etc.That knowledge has to come from somewhere. The checkpoint (base) model might imply a default style. "Realistic" models make really good photos and make them by default.Some part of your prompt should be dedicated to lock down a fixed style however. Those snippets you would reuse on many gens, so they are called "styles" and there are extensions to manage those also.There are many different ways that photos can look. Camera lens (think tele lens vs. fish eye). Ever heard the phrase "the camera adds 10 pounds"?Color balance, ISO/f-stop (hard or soft shadows), bokeh, depth of field etc.You don't have to worry about all the details, you can for example just add "photographed by ..." or "in the style of ..." (famous photographer name there). Here is a list of known styles that work: https://rikkar69.github.io/SDXL-artist-study/tags/You can filter by Photography tag on that page and try out what works.
>>8339090I've been prompting "Candid photo" but wasn't sure if it was actually doing anything
>>8339106That does a lot, just including "photo". "Candid photography" can make people not look at the camera etc., the opposite of posing for the camera. But other parts of the prompt might override that.If you are using a celeb lora, that is usually trained on photos only so that also tells SD to preferably make photos.That's also why some of these LoRAs feel "stiff". If they got trained on all red carpet pictures and you don't prompt for pose and facial expression, you always get the same face and doll like posture.
Emma-tentacles
>>8339165Ah, the Emma Watson Stylizer LoRA. Got deleted from civitai againI don't know what to do with it except tentacles
Wow, just adding a new photo lora and text2img is really cooking with gas with no extra work
>>8339026that is pony realism… the main loras I’m using are “freckles and skin xl” at 1.0-1.4, the pony realism amateur style at 0.2 (forget the exact name but it’s linked on the pony realism civitai page) and add-detail-xl at 0.5-1.0
>>8339187“We’d like you all to welcome Miss Hermione Granger back to Hogwarts - she will be teaching our new ‘Muggle Sexuality’ elective, which unsurprisingly has had a record number of applicants. I understand Miss Granger will be selecting her students personally in her bedr… er, office over the next several ni… er, days.”
Now these feel like real candid shots
>>8339187Can you make her with very hairy forearms and happy trail please?
>>8339412I didn't realize how many XL LoRAs work so well with with realistic pony models then>>8339431Other stuff to try: amateur (subtly changes the scene sometimes), shot from below, shot from above, extreme angleNow that you have turned up the skin detail she looks older. To go back try: cute, young and cute, insanely cute, unusually attractive, sexy young woman, attractive young womanAges also work: 20-year-old, teenager etc.>>8339441That is next level tit detail. Model/LoRA?
I don't get how all the people on civitai making celeb LoRAs are so bad at making any good images with their creationsI will have to try out all the LoRAs, even the ones with only total garbage images to show for itMaking LoRAs is apparently easier than making imagesSame face should be a bigger concern than getting good likeness
>>8339440hard to get her bare arms to show when tentacles pull them back like Harvey Weinstein
>>8339477I just added the Steve McCurry lora at 1 and I also use the Intricate Details at .3~.5 but I'm not sure if that effects skin details. I got all of these from Cyberrealistic 4.2
>>8338844Your reading comprehension is dogshit I was telling them to go back to their own thread
You gonna ever actually make her look like AOC instead of a filthy street rat
Why should I do that?
>>8339606>Bro this is good quality content, it has no place hereThat's smart ass sarcasmYou are implying that all content here is low quality and dalle content is high qualityIf you like it so much better, feel free to fuck off any time
>>8339706Hey little sis, you look great
>>8339480True I have to try all the loras really, because the examples are often really bad lolWhich model did you use for this one?
>>8339875The SD1.5 lycoris by frankyfrank2k. It's only 70 MB.That one actually has some good images except the forehead is always off. I fixed that by prompting for hair with bangs.What I'm genning with her makes a younger version than those example pics somehow. I then supported that with "young and cute,no makeup".It doesn't remove makeup but usually results in a younger look. All on Cyberrealistic checkpoint, but any good realistic model should work.The XL Lora I tried briefly. It makes an older version of her. The MILF variant is a totally different beast that I'll tackle later.Gonna grab the other SD1.5 LoRAs just in case. There is a rumor that civitai might go down the drain
>>8339187>>8339165for inspiration
>>8339919make sure you use refiner (with a decent XL model like epicrealism) and adetailer also with that checkpoint
>>8339929
>>8339914oh interesting it's 1.5 Looking good. Thanks for the info, and yeah always good to grab what you want, these websites are unpredictable.
>>8339935Only the face. Base is XL. When you let adetailer run, you can specify a different checkpoint and resolution. So 1.5 can touch up parts of your XL gens automatically.
>>8339929A non-pony refiner is going to wash out the pony specific details since it doesn't know these conceptsAlways use a realistic pony checkpoint as the refiner (no zonkey obviously)
>>8339946ah cool
>>8339960there is no pony model that has as realistic of faces as the best XL models. if i was making noname semi-anime women id go all pony, but the models simply dont know names like emma watson and loras dont get it all the way there
>>8339977Yeah then you'd need a separate img2img run with adetailer on the face and "skip img2img" set. Almost automated but stillI'm just saying, if your image has very pony-esque details that are foreign to the XL checkpoint, it will distort those. Highly detailed pussies, gaping assholes, pulled down panties etc.
Someone made a hucows pony loraDoesn't appear to work with zonkey but stillGet yer milk boys
>What's the name of this yoga pose? Funny, I can't remember>>8339872I'd bang them both at the same time>>8340005I don't normally go too extreme, but I do love some milking...
>>8328842>when he has a micropenis and you have to get creative
Baking.
Forgot.New thread.>>8341078>>8341078>>8341078
>>8339814Fuck you sperg