Previous thread >>8986916 The [dead] local Stable Diffusion realistic thread>Uncensored Flux modelChroma: https://civitai.com/models/1330309/chroma>Wan video modelshttps://civitai.com/models/1329096/wan-video-21https://civitai.com/models/1817671/wan-video-22>Related threads>>>/aco/futasdg>>>/b/ai>>>/gif/vdg>>>/g/sdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/trash/sdg
>>9015395>https://civitai.com/models/1330309/chromaOh, I missed these threads, there is an uncensored flux now? I'll have to try it out
reminder that even VRAMlets can use video models and loras to make single images.
>>9015395Thanks for the bake, it's been too long.>>9015452Been out a couple months now, it's trained by furries though and afaik even those aren't too happy with it. Last time someone tried it here he said you basically have to AI-generate a prompt that fills up the token limit otherwise you get bad quality. pic unrelated
>>9015654Fixed the broken sword
is there any decent civitai model for photorealistic porn that follows prompts? SeeDream is by far the only model I've found that is good for photorealism that actually closely follows prompts and poses, and doesn't mix up attributes between multiple characters.However, for some reason Seedream doesn't do well with NSFW generations. It doesn't block them or anything but it's just really really bad at them, to the point where I have to assume the creator intentionally didn't want that model used for porn. It's like Seedream has never seen a penis and doesn't know what a blowjob is.Also why is Seedream so bad at NSFW? Most other models will generate NSFW, they just suck at everything else (following prompts, faces, realism, etc). Seedream is great at everything else and then for whatever reason is terrible for hardcore stuff.
>>9016460chroma maybe, if you're ok with the rnd
>>9016460Short answer is try Chroma https://civitai.com/models/1330309/chroma or dumber checkpoints but specifically focused on nsfw, like Lustify https://civitai.com/models/573152/lustify-sdxl-nsfw-checkpointOr browse Civitai for pics you like then check the model and prompt used, go from there.>follows promptsThat depends on what your prompts look like. True natural language understanding is out of reach of anyone other than the huge online services, chatgpt, cortana, gemini, grok, dall-e, sora, etc. The main issue with NSFW in photorealistic models is that the models are not smart enough and there is no standardization in dataset tagging. For best results you need to know how the creator tagged his images in training, and then use similar words/phrases/syntax. You can get a limited form of that on Civitai if they provide some preview images with explicit hardcore, or from others' pics in the gallery if they randomly figured out how to do a specific thing. afaik most checkpoints capable of hardcore beyond the basic pov cowgirl/missionary are at least partially based on SDXL anime models, and as such require you to prompt using Danbooru tags, eg. instead of "girl sucking dick" you'd write "1girl, 1boy, from side, upper body, fellatio" each referring to a specific tag on the wiki https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/fellatio. This standardization means the model can learn the concept easier and doesn't get confused between sucking cock, blowing a guy, giving blowjob, performing fellatio, and a dozen other ways to phrase even just this one thing. The downside here is the underlying anime knowledge often leaks through and can give you uncanny valley looking stuff. Think the most well-known one in this category is PonyRealism https://civitai.com/models/372465/pony-realism
>>9016460I don't know exactly what you are looking for but for realism I use https://civitai.com/models/443821 I guess give it a try?
Helping a blacked guy is a -1 INT move.
>>9016600Eh, I help futa fags on /d/ too. There's enough content online now to stay angry at every day for the rest of your life, I don't think removing one creator of a hated fetish would make a difference there, nor a hundred. But he may pass it on to someone who ends up creating something more uncommon and more palatable.
>>9016605>I don't think removing one creator of a hated fetish would make a differenceyeah, no one has ever made an entire board to contain the autistic energies of one group of people.
>>9016596yeah, I've tried that model and it's maybe the 2nd best behind seedream but it's a distant 2nd (although it's a lot cheaper). The realism isn't quite the same, it's close but it's still clearly CGI whereas Seedream really looks like real people. But the biggest difference is adhering to prompts. Seedream is just far better than anything else in strict adherence to prompts (at least for non-NSFW). Especially with multiple characters, Seedream can adhere to individual prompts with 6 different people while every other model will mix attributes between the characters or not even have some of the characters. Seedream is also good at prompts for specific facial expressions and poses that other models aren't good at. Idk, Seedream is basically perfect except that for whatever reason it's terrible if you try making porn with it.Pic-related was the exact same prompt as >>9016460. I did another generation that was more accurate for the blowjob but there still wasn't a second woman and it still didn't really seem photorealistic like Seedream. The seedream got everything right except for the blowjob itself.>>9016539>>9016554I just tried Chroma. It's even more expensive than Seedream (50 buzz vs 40 per image) and it won't generate, it looks like it's at least temporarily down.>Unstable Resources>The following resources are experiencing a high generation failure rate, possibly due to temporary generator instability. This usually resolves with time and does not require action from you. This notice will be removed once performance stabilizes.and then when I try to generate it doesn't and gives this:>This is taking longer than usual. Don't want to wait? Cancel this job to get refunded for any undelivered images. If we aren't done by 1:23am we'll refund you automatically.so, idk, maybe it's temporary or maybe it's not supported anymore.
>>9016638Is it because Civitai doesn't allow you to use blue buzz to generate NSFW anymore?https://civitai.com/articles/20211
>>9016641damn. That just started today apparently so I don't think that's it but wtf. I hate how much companies are caving to censorship demands from banks
yea sucks it was convinient to just onsite create luckily I set up my local stuff before this was even announced but still sucks to not be able to just quick gen something without firing up the local
>>9012432Wow these look incredibly clean for AI images.I wonder what he's doing other than using a fat GPU.
>>9015719>>9015722I should make some Nilin sloppa>>9016460Seadream, just like many other models straight up doesn't know what's there between legs. It simply can't do these, no matter what you prompt.As for realistic porn there is:Some SDXL finetunes (mediocre, but can work, and currently the best bet if you want maximu realism)Realism mixes of Pony and Illustrious (better porn and even better for niche fetishes, but the realism is weaker than SDXL)Flux with loras (Bad since base flux has zero clue about genitalia and being distilled doesn't take training new concepts too well. Can get results with some luck though)Chroma is like Flux but it actually knows NSFW. The model is kinda mindbroken and schizo about anatomy at the moment so requires luck to get good results, at least until someone makes a good finetune.Wan 2.2 t2v with some NSFW lora can also make realistic images with image gen (single frame) mode. The base model lacks NSFW knowledge so the model is iffy when trying to get around that with LORAs like Flux.
>>9015395
>>9016867>>9016868>>9016866wow prompt?
Does anyone know how to inpaint with flux without using the "Flux Realistic" sampling method? This is for forged, but every other sampling method just makes it blur. The reason being is one of the Forged updates actually removed those sampling options and I had to revert to an older version, so I can't really update it without losing those.
>>9018349just use euler a and whatever scheduler. you need to inpaint at higher resolutions for it to look good.
>>9019050the thumbnail looks like something else
>>9019598...someone made a lora for that.
