Mixed Model AI - Hags-in-Waiting editionPrevious thread >>9156449Links:>Sora & ChatGpthttps://sora.chatgpt.com/https://chatgpt.com/>Geminihttps://gemini.google.com/app>Flux 2 (new)https://playground.bfl.ai>ImageFXhttps://labs.google/fx/tools/image-fx>DALL-E 3 (Bing and Designer)https://www.bing.com/images/createhttps://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator>Copilothttps://copilot.microsoft.com/>Imagen 4https://labs.google/fx/tools/whiskhttps://poe.com/Imagen-4>Midjourney [PAID]https://www.midjourney.com/home>NovelAI [PAID]https://novelai.net/image>Tensor [PAID]http://tensor.art/>Perchancehttps://perchance.org/ai-character-generator>Revehttps://reve.art/>Flux.1https://playground.bfl.ai/image/generatehttps://vidfly.ai/apps/ai-image-generator/Video Creation Links:http://hailuoai.com/videohttps://app.pixverse.ai/https://klingai.com/https://wan.video/https://lumalabs.ai/dream-machinehttps://rentry.org/wan21kjguidehttps://rentry.org/AnimAnon-AnimDiffhttps://www.freeconvert.com/webm-converterhttps://unwatermark.ai/video-watermark-remover/https://convertio.co/Local/SD threads:>>>/aco/asdg>>>/aco/csdg>>>/aco/futasdg/
...And that's 5 replies.
Thanks for bake.
Simple life being a sheriff on an agri-world...Just posting some stuff, gonna try to make some beach/bikini pics but it seems Google Flow is slowly cranking the vise.
>>9172615>>9172629thx for your star wars gens..dl'ed them all o7...and i'm not ashamed to admit it
>>9172665Thanks, glad you like them! Sometimes I'm just going for a nice feel or particular look, not anything all that lewd.
>>9172665Also did some quick tries with Karen Fukuhara and Lana Condor to see how it looked.
And here's Lana. Just a cute farm girl on Dantooine...
Slow day on Rakata Prime.
Shame we never see the lekku move in any one the games. I asked Grok about the physiology of them and came to the conclusion that they should work as a muscular hydrostat like the tongue. Which means they should be able to move and wiggle around! (Especially when happy, I'm sure.)
>>9172676>>9172685thx.. great gens, as always..i don't need naked skin for my star wars fantasies..o7
>>9172703As a (retired) Star Wars nerd, I can confirm that Grok is probably catching onto extant lore that says they subtly move as a means of non-verbal communication. Though you'd have to be another Twi'lek or someone particularly observant (ambassador droid like C-3PO, force sensitive, or perhaps an Echani) to make sense of their meaning.
>>9172629Nice to see you again, Anon! How have you been?
>>9172742I saw that on Wookiepedia, that a large part of their Ryl language uses subtle lekku movements and I had known since before that they were semi-prehensile. I wonder if they start wiggling when they're excited or happy like cat tails.>>9172802Hey! Doing okay, could be better. Was gonna cook some dinner tonight but forgot to take the meat out of the freezer... How's you?
>>9172831I’m alright. Just a bit tired from work. Kinda randomly putting ideas into Grok, see what catches my fancy. Right now it’s yoga.
>>9172831I always imagined that they were (mostly) fatty tissue and thus couldn't move a lot. Especially not like a cat's tail (which is a bony structure). Instead, what we see is that they mostly just hang there; presumably they don't have the strength to fully lift their own weight and act as fifth and sixth limbs.
>>9172629> it seems Google Flow is slowly cranking the viseThey fucked Flow hard a cpl nights ago. Its a shadow of itself now. Big shame, felt like the only decent corporate AI generator available.
>>9173250Oh, you bumped it before me. Ah well.>>9173257I've used Google/NB2 to explore alternate liveries for race cars but I haven't tried doing porn stuff outside of Perchance which does literally whatever you want. The problem with it is resolution.
>>9172629Good to see you are still at it, always nice to see your gens. Are you paying for flow? I've been working on my prompts but it's difficult to experiment when you only have a handful of free tries per day, and they seem to get lower every other week...>>9173257>>9173261According to the documentation you can use nbp/nb2 via the google cloud API and disable almost all filters (the exceptions are those for CSAM and "personally identifiable information").Using the API costs money per gen, but you get 300 dollars worth of credits when you open your account.I haven't tried it myself because 1. Setting up image gen via API requires much more effort than just loggin into a website. 2. You have to spend the 300 dollars within 90 days. 3. I don't want to risk my google account getting banned.
>try the wan guide>workflow keeps shitting out errors and wont run>try other workflows and use some shit I find off civitai>video that is generated is just a fucking garbled messI completely dont understand is there a decent step by step guide for doing the first video generation I have the card and ram for it.
>>9173271Gorgeous pic, that looks amazing. Is that also Google Flow?I'm not paying for it, just genning for free. I haven't really counted but you seem to get somewhere between 12 and 16 gens with NBP, but countless seemingly with NB2 (though with obvious downgraded quality). I kinda try out prompts with NB2 then generate with NBP to get higher quality, though sometimes it doesn't work with NB2 but *does* work with NBP.
>>9173465you're better off asking on the degen threads in b for such help, these celeb worshippers dont know much besides "type one of five washed up whores name into a box and add another movie reference " then fap to fully clothed images like the good little goys they are.
More dobonhonkeros
>>9173475No, that's lovart. Scarlett seems to be completely blocked on flow. This pic is from flow.>>9173465Try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVDKYwt-DBg
Why is there always some sperg having a melty in every ai thread?
>>9173271That is an incredible gen.Indistinguishable from a photo far as I can tell.
a bit different
>>9173607I'm guessing it's because they attract browns. I wouldn't even bother posting in those threads unless:>The vibes are good>You really need help making something work, like Chroma or somethingIf you're talking about the guy complaining about the twi'lek poster, his post is very brown-coded.Full disclosure, those twi'lek posts do nothing for me. They're barely sexy and not at all pornographic. They don't even imply anything.
>>9173632You atleast posted a pic along with your criticism.
>>9173654>You atleast posted a pic along with your criticism.It's literally the least that one can do IMO. Clicking "generate" does not take appreciable work once you have a decent-ish prompt.
>>9173677>>9173654I feel the need to clarify my position here:Just because I don't "care for" someone's posts doesn't mean I feel the need to police them. The worst I've done is say something to the effect of:>Hey guys, maybe we should try a little more variety hereIn an effort to make the thread a more lively place.
>>9173707A lot of posts in these threads seem like they belong on a blue board rather than on /aco/, but it's not really worth making a thing out of it.
>>9173607"Grok, make Ariana look like she actually does now."
>>9173707If there were ever an /ai/ board it ought to have a board specific rule about autismposting the same subject over and over that comes with a 7 day ban.Except that guy who was making clips of tentacle-raped female astronauts in space stations forced to lay clutches of eggs, because that was fucking hot.
>>9173499>these celeb worshippers dont know much besides "type one of five washed up whores name into a box and add another movie reference " then fap to fully clothed images like the good little goys they are.That's harshIt's 100% factual though
>>9173771True, but some of those threads are quite fast and it's possible you could cop a ban for posting almost-but-not-quite porn.Why take a risk?
>>9172516whats best for making cute and funny images?
>>9173805Valid, jannies on some of these boards are just weird about that stuff.
>>9173808>>>/b/
>>9173809>the tl;dr/aco/ was the containment board for all ai at one point but those restrictions seem to have since been relaxed. the celeb genners on /aco/ are a vestigial fragment of a timelost era
>>9173824Just quickly checking /s/, /hc/, and /b/, the only board that had an active AI porn thread was on /b/, and that was mostly loli crap. I'm not interested in that shit.I'm willing to bet there's one on /h/ and /d/ but I'm not really into going over there.
I have nothing to add to the conversation.
>>9173836Most of the AI tabs I have open live in /r and /gif and /aco.
>it aint gonna suck itself
Trying to get a dramatic low-angle shot but this is the closest one I've gotten to what I was looking for.>>9173520Ah, nice. Is it good to use? The low amount of free gens you mentioned, was that Flow or Lovart as well?Fantastic pic, love seeing more Harley.>>9174635Cute!
>>9174804am retard
This is what I've gotten otherwise, more of a wide shot but it seems to have gotten a bit closer to what I want when I went for a bikini instead of a swimsuit.NBP is also kinda weird about the orange twi'leks, for some reason it seems to generally generate them with black American faces, even when European face is specified. Maybe it's because of Oola from RotJ.Big fan of her body, though, goddamn those meaty thighs.
>>9174809>for some reason it seems to generally generate them with black American facesIt's might be from the skin color. Did you try a pale one?
Just as an exercise, I tried to specify a a super low angle on a few gens.This is the lowest I got with the subject standing.
>>9175034how low you talking? depends on what you go into detail about and what your focus is. if you go into heavy detail on the face and clothes its probably gonna focus on that 9/10 times
>>9175291awww..that's cute and wholesome :')
>>9175145I was trying to have the camera point upward, up her legs.Maybe if I mentioned feet it would've worked better, I don't know. I said the camera was literally on the ground.
>>9174804>>9175034>>9175349Not sure if this is the kind of view you are after, you could try adding into your prompts and see if it helps .....>the camera is placed very low , looking up at her from below between her legs , emphasizing her height and dominance . She towers over the camera giving an exaggerated perspective for a unique camera angle .
>>9175388Very nice! I ended up with something pretty good even if all images per gen aren't like this. I wanted something more close up, think mid-thigh and up, but this also works. I realized that removing the part of the prompt that specifies a beach or resort or anything like that makes for a more dramatic angle upwards since it doesn't try to fit that into the image.
Nice angle here as well but the POV kinda makes it look like you're an inch tall haha. And it went a bit nuts with the nose rings. Super hot body, thoughWHY IS 4CHAN BEING SO SLOW
Okay, I added "The shot is framed from mid-thigh to her head." and that kinda fixed it actually.
>>9174804Flow is decent. Fairly generous amount of gens but stricter filters and no free 4K. Yes, the low amount of free gens was on lovart, and on genspark, their business models must be doing badly.>>9175388>>9175395>>9175396Great gens.
>>9175400Flow was alot better a week ago, the filters were more lenient and there was a cheeky workaround for celebs which now seems to be patched sadly.
Good afternoon! I hope you guys are doing well today!
>>9175388ceiling view or sky view in there makes sure its pointed upward. mentioning feet or floor is going to make those visible. seen from below usually works. fisheye lens also gives it a close up view >palm trees clouds blue sky view>legs seen from below>fisheye lensgave me this type of shot
GAYYYYYYY
>>9175400Thanks! Fantastic Mystique, I love the skin texture from the movies. Perfect body, too, I love her tight little ass.>>9175411Sorry about the late response, I was testing out a VPN and the IP I got in the US was range banned lol. And then after I had disconnected it there was constant connection issues to 4chan.
I thought posting was fixed, what hapened?
Even now, it's really fucking slow to post.>>9175459I didn't think of fisheye lens, but I did basically the two others.>>9175291>>9175554Cute pics!
>>9175813Oh, it’s alright! Whole site’s been wonky lately. Had trouble posting myself, too.
>Cloudflare still fucking upFix it, jeets
>>9175814>>9175828I love mom
>>9175862Thanks. I've been kinda feeling trashy, dirty blonde MILFs the last couple weeks.I don't really know celebrities (nor do I want to), so I gen archetypes.Strange thing with how the site is (not) working right now: Even though I should have gotten two (you)'s, I only got one.
>>9175907Meant to post an image.Think I'm getting better at refining down my prompts.
>>9175922>>9175907Love me some milfs. And yes its still broken, I've given up trying to post images, I get connection error message
>Fat womenEww.
are we still getting backtraced?
>and now for something completely differentbut not really
>>9175034Lily Munster lookalike
Where's Xena and bustier Gabby
>does this count as furfag?not if its spooky and weird
>>9176390I'd fuck Quelaag
>>9176403>>9176404>>9176406>>9176412>>9176414 nice work Anon !
>LamiaCoward. It's almost like you don't want her to keep you hard for all eternity.
>>9176489>>9176495superb fantasy fodder..o have a huge collection of monster girls, amd now it's eben..err..hugelierTHX!
I think I've perfected inPaint.
I think I have to draw a line at Anon's thinly veiled scat fetish.That shit is gross dude.
>>9176532Scat's gross. Powerless women are hot.
Last one for now- I don't want to spam the thread too hard.Really happy with how this one came out, other than the background being rather barren.
>>9176532>>9176537>>9176543thx for the additional medusas o7
lack of vidgen in this thread.
>>9172516how long until sora stops working, i'm assuming they aren't gonna just give people the means of doing it locally
>>9176132Give her Pam Poovey hair
>>9176555Hope you don’t mind me using an old video. Grok putting the video generator behind a paywall really sucks.
>>9176542the most jewish photo to ever exist.
>>9176489Fun fact: a medusa's power is inversely proportional to the size of her bosom.
>>9176746Hey, I'm the guy in the /co/ thread who asked for them kissing, can I get them kissing but in a more toon style?
>>9176865Nice to see you here, Anon! Here you go! I’ll make some more, just in case.
>>9176881Gratitude. Can it be animated? With lots of caressing and grabbing namely of the butt?I'm only asking because I'm sure you know that interracial yuri is very low in numbers and the one other guy I know who was doing it has disappeared for the past 9 days
>>9176882I hope you don’t mind me using an old video I made. Grok put their video making stuff behind a paywall, which sucks.
>>9176893Damn, can't have more good shit. Thanks anyway
>>9176900No problem. I can see if I have anymore tonight or tomorrow, whenever I get the chance.
Oh shit she adapted. WELP I'm cooked.
Kissies>>9176746They really fucked Grok, real shame. Can't even do image editing with a free account.
Got into black girls, so enjoy the ESL sex dialogue. The video came out well, though, actually surprised it let me spread her legs and zoom in.>Happy birthday, baby. I was thinking you could fuck my ass tonight.>Do you wanna start with my mouth? Or maybe you wanna fuck my tits.>Or do you wanna start with your tongue?
>>9177009I hope they go back to letting us use it for free again. I like Grok, but I refuse to pay for it. Nice kisses, by the way!
>>9177358>>9177359>>9177360BABY NEED MILKIES
>>9172516>>9172516>>9172516Where's Trinity?
>>9177016Whats good that is free to make videos out of images then
>>9177016I would like to pay for grok, but not at this time until israel stopped being a dick or USA stopped being a ZOG bitch.
>>9177937So never then ?
Trying more longer video gens with Grok.>>9176414>>9177618Absolutely fantastic images with Nicki, goddamn! Incredible gens, all of them.>>9177358Super, love her huge tits from that angle.
>>9177937>I would like the third world to be as powerful as the first world Yeah bro BRICS all the way
>>9178601Thanks bro, appreciate it. And nice vids, love me some black ladies. I haven't used Grok since the paywall, so I don't know of they've fixed their filters, but if you need some help with celebs let me know, grok doesn't really have a classifer for celebs.
Any tips on getting around the moderation on ChatGTP or Grok?
>>9179217yeah /pol/ go home you're drunk
Are dragonic tits allowed here? https://files.catbox.moe/s17ubm.png
>>9179518VPN might work
Hey, guys! How’s it going?
>>9179337Grok is so and so. It seems more regionally locked than before so some countries get more filters than others. Did you use to do celebs with Grok?Awesome pic, she looks super hot.>>9180078Cute! Hailey looks really cute as a twi'lek!>>9180478Hey, dude. Going fine, could be better. Doing some black chicks. How are you?
>>9180626Been in a bit of a weird “on and off” kind of mood, if that makes any sense. Just feel like I’m in a pit lately.
>>9180626Yes, likeness sucks in motion thought. Can you generate a random woman topless?
a bit of a silly question here, butsora was rather shit for anything naughty for quite a while but I was still using it for silly shit and random images I needed now it's going away permanently in few dayswhat's a good 'all rounder' online ai img gen? Preferably free
>>9181036I've used Sora (GPT-1) quite a bit, overall it's probably the "best" generator I've used, despite their absurd censorship. Local (if you don't mind having no control over your generations) is pretty nice nowadays, but not as fun. As far as I'm concerned, I don't think you can find a good 'all rounder' that can match GPT-1 dataset and training. NB2 / NBP are good but they are hardstuck in photo-realism and you have to tailor every single prompt to get something out of it.
>>9181059thanksand I guess the current model will still be available via chatgpt, even if that's way less convenient
>>9181059I laughed at that Lara Croft, well done.
>>9181074never seen tracer_mercy and mercy in that stylewell done o7
Made on Perchance. Prompt:>famous vintage 60s photo, Exaggerated bimbo pornstar fertilitygoddess: Perfect hyperfeminine extreme pornstar fertilitygoddess woman, exaggerated Maximalist Bimbo aesthetic. Hyperdetailed lip filler dickpillows gigantic bimbo lips, lovely sexy big blue eyes, sexy long lashes, gorgeous sexy girly makeup. Huge gorgeous voluminous huge perfect blonde waved hair. Perfect torpedo massively pointy tits, pointy areolas, pointy long detailed nipples, gigantic pointy detailed nipples, Hypercurvy love goddess hyper-curvy. Welcoming viewer topless. Pink bedazzeled jewellery, Hugely sexy luxury hyperfeminine nails. Hyper wide hips, gigantic round puffy hips, gigantic round ass cheeks visible, Extreme ultra-thick voluptuous hips, wearing cutesy sexy thong with cameltoe, hyper arousing and cutesy details and accessories, ultra-thick fat round thighs. (hyperrealistic obscene 1960s bombshell glamour noody pollypocket bimbodoll danniashe hyperdetailed), grainy photograph, 1960s photo with film grain, 60s photo with vignetting, retro, r/OldSchoolCool, 60s photo, vintage photoNo negative prompt.Seed: (seed:::397620812)
>>9181059GPT-1 was a great model. I didnt take to at first as I was still caught up in Dalle3 but I warmed to it fairly quickly. It had that Dalle behaviour of being able to throw short suggestive words or phrases at it and it come back having rewitten a prompt internally that you wouldnt be able to get past the text filters if you wrote it out word for word. You could wangle some pretty decent stuff out of it on the Sora website depending on how you prompted it. Medical Posters being an example of how to get some pretty explicit images past the filters. I really dislike 1.5 it just has a clittered look to it I cant get on with. GPT2 is supposedly coming soon. Also if you go on lmarena, there is a model called soft-shell popping up over there which is supposedly XAI's newest model which looks decent at least in terms of output.
>>9181139Made on Perchance.Prompt:>famous vintage 70s photo, Exaggerated bimbo pornostar fertilitygoddess: Perfect hyperfeminine extreme pornostar fertilitygoddess woman, exaggerated exuberant Bimbo aesthetic. Hyperdetailed lip filler dickpillows gigantic bimbo lips, sexy kitty big blue eyes, beautiful long lashes, gorgeous sexy girly makeup. Huge gorgeous voluminous huge perfect blonde waved hair. Perfect torpedo massively pointy tits, pointy areolas, pointy long detailed nipples, gigantic pointy detailed nipples, Hypercurvy love goddess hyper-curvy. Welcoming viewer topless. Pink kitsch jewellery, Hugely sexy luxury hyperfeminine nails. Hyper wide hips, gigantic round puffy hips, gigantic round ass cheeks visible, Extreme ultra-thick voluptuous hips, wearing cutesy sexy thong with cameltoe, hyper arousing and cutesy details and accessories, ultra-thick fat round thighs. (hyperrealistic seductive 1970s bombshell glamour noody pollypocket bimbodoll Danish hyperdetailed), grainy photograph, 1970s photo with film grain, 70s erotically glamorous photo, retro maximalism, 1970s pin-up porn, vintage pornNo negative prompt.Seed: (seed:::680280155)Guidance Scale: (guidanceScale:::8)
>>9181157Same thing but, after "vintage porn" at the end:> This is a modern photograph with clear detail in high resolution.Negative prompt:disney and pixar and anime style cartoon. comicbook or manga style art. 3d or cgi style rendering. The subject is in motion. There is excessive motion blur and camera shake. Her mouth is gnarly chewed up and battered and her tongue merges into her lips in a disgusting way. Her hands are withered and frail, she has too many finger and her arms are spindly and grotesque. The subject has a warped and deformed face. Their body is twisted and misshapen. The shot is messy, chaotic and has a polished glossy sheen to it. This is an animated, cgi, painting of some unrealistic abstract nonsense.
>>9172516
>>9181266Very nice.I like how you can *barely* make out her nips.
>>9180815Oh yeah, just gotta make sure the NSFW button is on.>>9181021Fuck, that's a good one. I love her big tits under the see-through top and the ass you're getting on her is nuts. Is that NBP?
>>9181347It's NB2. If you can make topless women with grok then you can make topless celebs and animate them. Do you have a burner mail?
>>9181368Nah, I'm running it with my regular account since it's paid for and Grok doesn't let you generate any images at all with a free account anymore... Do you need a burner for celebs?
>>9181373No lol, I'm asking if you have a burner mail, I'm not posting a jailbreak here.
>>9181379Ah, gotcha hahaIf you're fine with Mailinator, just send it to happyman1010@sogetthis.com
>>9181379Hey, man, you can reply to that one Proton mail I used, that's me.
>the power of gpt2 mediumYikes>>9181404Sent
>disssscord 94tNCjXn hello, if you'd like to add more content, you can join my AI-dedicated dissscord server. there are public sections, where you can add whatever you want, whenever you want
This AI shit has really hurt my productivity. I just want to PROOOMPT all day jerking off to progressively more niche and specific scenarios. And I know it's only going to get worse. When the tools get better I'll be able to put all my ideas into a storyboard and make entire comics. My dick will not survive.
>>9181368Hey mate, Is the celeb stuff still working for you the same with NB ? I was getting some great stuff on flow up to about a week ago, then it got patched / nerfed for me mid gen, havent been able to get literally anything good since then :(
>>9181382prompt?
>>9181629Hey. No, not working the same at all. Its possible to do some things, but they cucked it hard. No full names, can't have both eyes visible on most images, etc. Context (beach, pool) is easier to get through but still can get blocked a lot.
>>9181692Its a crying shame, seems like they updated all their classifiers as I get different types of rejection messages now. I was getting some my my fav gens ever the last cpl of weeks as well. Sad times>>9181411>the power of gpt2 mediumHad a little play with this on arena, seems to be pretty heavily rate limited as I got a 50 min cooldown after like 4 images. Looks good from a limited amount of prompting, seems to produce noticeably different outputs from the same prompts used in GPT1 or 1.5 Ive always preferred the OpenAI aesthetic. But I think we are at a point now where the filters are the biggest choice in whether to bother with a model or not. Only been trying this new GPT on arena and the filters there are terrible. Might be more lenient features through GPT or API but unsure. Sora website seemed to have the loosest filters for GPT 1 but its getting closed end of this month. GPT image 2 picrel for context.
>>9181266very nice
>>9181772>Its a crying shameYeah, it was a bit too good, still has some use but too many hurdles...I also like the OpenAI aesthetic better, but this time the censorship is a bit crazy, I get "third party content" warnings for mentioning clothing brands, and they haven't fixed the default sepia filter, wrong proportions and bad anatomy either. "Looking back.." can still make them look like their neck is broken, and it still duplicates objects if they're holding a single item.>the filters are the biggest choice in whether to bother with a model or notI can deal with that if at least they had a platform like Sora, but going through chat GPT is just ass. GPT found issues with the purse & smiling expression on picrel, but had no issue leaving the micro string thong, big butt, and celebrity name untouched. ?? It makes no sense. LMArena seems better, and you can translate words that trigger the filter to arabic and it won't block it.>GPT 1 but its getting closed end of this monthThey killed it already. Can't make gens, generation reaches 150%+ and prompt fails or loops endlessly.
>>9181906>>9181908gets a bit sloppy with that amount of characters at once I admit
Good afternoon! How are you guys doing? Don’t think I posted this one yet, but it is an old pic.
>>9181909Second one is really good
>>9181925Doing okay. Should've watched a movie today but I started with dinner too late so I just didn't watch one. I'll be sad to report that I jorked to Zendaya yesterday, never thought I'd see the day...How's you? Really nice pic, love seeing the black girl with her legs spread and her tits out, and the redheaded girl going to town on her titties.
>>9182073Oh, no! How could you done such a thing? lol just kidding! I’m doing alright. Still a bit annoyed with Grok, but I can still work with it. Also, I was trying to have Red’s head between Green’s legs.
>>9182094Can you use Grok again? Have they changed so free accounts the generate or edit images?
>>9182111Yeah, but they still have the editing and video making behind a paywall. Also, for some reason, it’s always in “high demand” and “busy”, so it won’t let you make anything. Gotta use it at a lucky time.
>>9181059I love sora solely because of this dude's stuff.https://www.deviantart.com/smartandstrong/gallery/all?order=newest
>>9182208she's a big girl
>>9182333it would be extremely pleasurable
>>9172516any tips for running stuff on Qwen models with Forge and 12gb vram?
>>9181797Had a bit more of a play around with GPT2.. It seems like it prompt rewrites like crazy if it doesnt like your prompt but it passes the text filter, way more than any other model Ive tried. To the point that the outputs barely resemble the input prompt.>it still duplicates objects if they're holding a single item.Yep, Im finding that too. Picrel.>I can deal with that if at least they had a platform like Sora, but going through chat GPT is just assGoing through GPT has always been horrible for images going back to Dalle3, ChatGPT image censorship is horrid. I dont need a preachy moralistic fucking bot telling my why it wont send my prompt to the image generator. Just fucking submit the prompt !!
>>9182094>How could you done such a thing?I was never into her don't like her in most of her roles, but she does look good in certain conditions (still looks like Sir Hiss from Robin Hood in some shots haha).That tight body does something to be, though>>9182117>it’s always in “high demand” and “busy”Oh, so it's not just me. Even with my 10$ paid account. xAI needs to fix their shit, goddamn.>>9182386You're probably better off asking the SD threads, this one is more for online generators not local, sorry.
>>9182369UUUU
>>9182470Not a fan of her portrayal of MJ in the Spider-Man movies. But if she came up to me and said hi, my legs would be jelly.
>>9182431Tried GPT2 on LMArena and I can get through old Sora prompts that always made nipples or huge tits but the images get filtered, probably need toning down since GPT2 is more prompt adherent, butt/thongs are fine thought. It looks like a good model but ChatGPT cucking the prompts takes the fun out of it, specially when the bot gets sanctimonious like you said. I've read they have a 4k model that is way better. maybe it's worth through API if it has less censorship. Nice pic with the Thing, the skin texture on hips / hair on forearms looks very realistic.>>9182073>I jorked to Zendaya yesterdayKek
>>9182534 The Thing / Ortega gen isnt mine, pretty sure thats a Nano Banana gen going off style and resolution . You can access the 4k version though Higgsfield and probably all the other online paid AI providers. Wonder if its genuine 4k or its just the same images ran through an upscaler like NB2 seems to be?
>>9182544I know its Banana but I thought it was you lol, my bad.I've no idea if its 4k native I haven't read much about it, but I wish google's upscaler was available to download or something, it's pretty clean and doesnt introduce weird shit. Cute Dani, are you getting that from LMArena or GPT?
>>9176475>>9182544Wait, are you this one?
>>9182568Yes.
>>9182571Ah the filename threw me off, cool. Drop a burner mail if you have one, I can help you with the NB2 issue.
>>9182565>>9182571these are amazing
>>9182573Ahhh cool, thanks Anon, much appreciated .... Aco_Anon@proton.me
>>9182574Thank you, big tits black lady!>>9182578Sent
>>9182208>Nobody cared who I was before I put on the pounds
>>9182582Cheers mate, replied.
>>9182565>>9182573Fuckin' beautiful work on this one, holy smokes she's sexy.>>9182574This looks like that one black pornstar, I can't remember her name. Jada Fire? I remember watching her and Vanessa Blue
"convert to Unreal Engine 5 with 16K textures and ray tracing" sometimes gives good results with grok, but I'm actually looking for the uncanny valley anime proportions with real skin, has anyone been able to replicate that?
>>9184889I used to get this with "convert to 8K Unreal Engine 5 with detailed photorealistic textures and ray tracing" on Nano Banana Pro, but it got more censored and higgsfield started moderating the images before I even upload them.
>>9184890It also always reduces boob size, as seen.
RIP
Anyone knows what's fucking wrong with OpenAI?
>>9186086The AI models have always been mostly fine with violence but weird about anything sexy or lewd.>>9186284Cute pic!
>>9186815thanks. you too
>>9186817GoddamnWhich site did you use to do this?
>>9187816local, (very lazily) genned the image using Z Image Turbo, then image to video using Wan 2.2
>>9187827Ah, bummerLooks great
Hope you guys don’t mind something a bit more stylized than my usual output
Posting this because I have no ideas.>>9188152Post away, man. Very nice style, I like that, actually.
