Troons are more likely to rape than any other demographics
Troon rapes his dad and bites his ear off
Troon tries to rape his mom
>>954791158troons are a minorityeven if you totaled them outthey are vastly outnumbered by the number of cis white men raping kids
Troon ICU nurse arrested for raping newborn babies
Troon police officer rapes kid in restaurant bathroom
Despite being less than 1% of the population troons are vastly overrepresented in rape statistics.If you're in a room with a troon and a normal person you're 5x more likely to get raped by the troon than the other person
>>954791158Rates of Sexual offending Derived from His Majesty's Prison service data. (2023)why, that's a remarkably odd source for American trans people. Almost like you have an agenda going on here OP. But lets continue.the UK records there were 15,897 prisoners for sex offences in 2025. the Office of National Statistics records that there are 24.2 million adult males in the UK in 2025. therefore the calculation would indicate that there is a sex offending rate of 656.9 men per million, not 395 As of March 31, 2024, Ministry of Justice data released via UK Parliament Written Answers shows that there were 151 transgender prisoners who were recorded as legally male at birth (identifying as women, non-binary, or gender-fluid) and who had convictions for a sexual offenceThe Office for National Statistics (ONS) recorded a total of 262,000 people indicating that their gender identity was different from their sex registered at birth in the 2021 Census for England and Wales. Within this group:118,000 (0.24%) answered “No” but did not provide a write-in response48,000 (0.10%) identified as a trans man48,000 (0.10%) identified as a trans woman It is reasonable to assume that 50% of those who did not specify are trans women, or 59,000, plus the 48,000 who did specify. (The reality is there are more trans women than men, which would lower the per capita number further.) 151 offenders of a population of 107000 is a per capita rate of 1,411.2 per million. not 1,916So, 15,897, vs 151 = 0.94% of prisoners are trans. The percentage in the general population is around 1%. So OP is lying about base rates, halving the real number. Lying about the trans rates, increasing the number by nearly 25%. And a population two orders of magnitude smaller will invariably show a higher per capita rate, it is a known distortion of per capita numbers - for example the murder rates of Andorra and Lichtenstein, compared to their neighbouring countries.
>>954792346Hold on there, slight problem in your data.Some of the male percentage could also be trans though. Not everywhere accepts "trans identity" or "preferred gender" as part of the files on said individuals
>>954791158Donald Trump is a troon? He's raping the nation and you're in a cult.
>>954792515>what about
>>954792521Donald Trump is a troon now? Good to know.
>>954792515Says the rainbow supporter
>>954791158But, for the record, you are NOT obsessed, right, uneducated white trash retard? ;)LMFAO you pathetic subhumans are all exactly the same. Seethe on, retard!
>>954792561says the pedophile lover
Oh dear, they're frothing at the mouth again...
>>954792585You'll never be a woman, you're just an autistic brainwashed faggot in a dress
>>954792623You'll never get into college, you'll always be a worthless uneducated white trash subhuman who WORSHIPS PEDOPHILES.Am I doing this right?
>>954792600If this was the 1900s you would applaud and encourage it. You only shame people because you want to fit in. You'll support the dykes and the fags and the confused fags and people jerking off to cartoon animals. Don't act like you have morals
>>954792640I went to two colleges and being accepted in a college these days have never been easier.Saying you're in college these days doesn't mean jack shit. Enjoy your debt.
>>954791176classic "doesn't understand per capita" retarded niggerthe rate they offend means being near a random tranny is more dangerous than being near a random man.
>>954791176Ask me how I know you don't realize it proved majority of trans are unhinged lunatics?
>>954792476except the ONS and the UK prison service which are the sources for those numbers do track it. So that's trying to go off "feelings" about numbers instead of facts, As certain groups always do, while claiming its their opposition. even if they do it would be less than 1% of the 15900, and once again, it would still be the problem of comparing per capita rates in groups of different orders of magnitude.if there's one country of 100,000 people, and a another of 20 million: 99 people in the country of 20 million eat babies. that's 4.95 per 1,000,000 people. 1 person in the country of 100,000 ate a baby. that's 10 per 1,000,000.
>>954792920https://www.npr.org/2023/01/15/1149318664/transgender-and-non-binary-people-are-up-to-six-times-more-likely-to-have-autism
>>954792920>Doesn't think babies count as humans
>>954793246>reading comprehension: I don't have itthat wasn't the point. that wasn't even close to being about the point.
>>954791158So some men rape more than other menWhy men are so evil
>>954793430Because women deserve it
>>954791158rape is ok when i'm not the one being raped
>>954793416It is part of the point though. Babies are humans, so why mention they had to be babies but not add them into the population amount?Also if they're eating babies that lowers the population pool.There are also men who don't want to admit they want to troon out, so the whole trans data is completely pointless.
>>954793430Women also lie about being raped.
Hoo boy the white trash subhumans are really demonstrating what a bunch of Nazi pedophiles they are!
>>954793840What group is wanting jews to die again?
>>954793868That would be the white trash Nazis, thanks for asking
>>954793891Pretty sure it's the left who want to "free Palestine" by wanting to attack Jewish people.
>>954792920Your math ain't mathing
>>954791158Pretty sure niggers rape. Fucking nigger faggot
>>954793891Based off them. Allowing dumb niggers to integrate was clearly a massive mistake
>>954791176Imagine 2 people in the world had green hair. Now imagine 1 raped a person. You could say "Wow, green hair people rape at a rate of 4 billion per capita!!! There's a 50% chance any person with green hair will rape someone!!!"Just a stupid argument. If there were 5 of them you could say 20% chance even, and say they clearly are a danger to society!
>>954792920>one country of 100,000 >1 person in the country ate a baby.Okay....>That's 10 per 1,000,000Where the fuck did this number come from? Where did you get 10 if he only ate 1 baby? Are you retarded?>20,000,000 country >99 people eat babiesHow many babies? Are we assuming they just had one each?>That's 4.95 per 1,000,000What the hell is 4.95? Someone didn't finish? Where did this number come from?Holy shit no wonder why you leftist don't know what a woman is, you're fucking dumb.
>>954794166That's not how that works though.
>>954793966>I dont understand how per capita is calculated, and I want everyone to see. fixed that for you.
>>954791158Then wouldnt chuds like them more?
>>954794468You didn't fix shit because per capita doesn't even calculate into what you're sayingI think you're legit stupid. Show the math.
>>954791158So there are 5 popes per square mile in Vatican City.
>>954791176>>954794166Imagine you have 500,000 Toyota Camrys and 500 Lamborghini Aventadors.10,000 of the Camrys have their transmission fail.200 of the Aventadors have their transmission fail.Which car has the transmission that is more likely to break?
>>954794601The one that doesn't replace the oil fast enough
>>954794632>Gaslighting liar faggot has to deflect and be intentionally obtuse in order to change the subject because they can't ever recognize per capita statistics are real
>>954794601Your example doesn't make sense (again) because they'd be using different transmissions and we don't know if they're having the same problem or not.You are by far the dumbest person on 4chan right now if you're the same goofy bitch who doesn't know how math works from the previous posts
>>954793929Pretty sure you're uneducated white trash who couldn't explain the first thing about the history of the region and just wants to suck Israeli cock, you worthless pedophile worshipping subhuman ;)
>>954794671Your example doesn't even make sense, againLike I said here >>954794712They're using different transmissions.
>>954794712See>>954794671 Leftists are incapable of engaging in an honest and good faith debate.
>>954794185>Uneducated White trash demonstrating precisely why he barely graduated high schoolHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAGA
>>954794748>DEBATE ME REEEEEWe're just here to laugh at and trigger you, Charlie Kirk. There's nothing to be gained from engaging in bad-faith seething arguments with pedophile-worshipping Nazi trash ;)
>>954794719>MAGA are literally Nazis!>TRUMP IS LITERALLY HITLER!also>MAGA SUCKS JEW COCK!
>>954794719I know Jews were there first and Palestine has no mention in any historical relics in that region for starters.I also know until more recent that Palestine wasn't even on the world map.I also know being gay in Palestine is considered taboo and you could be jailed up to ten years if you're accused of being one.
>>954794782Why haven't you asked me how I know (for a fact) you couldn't get into college, pedo trash!
>>954794748Your example did not make sense because they'd be using different transmissions you dumb fuck
>>954794601>Now imagine you've got a subsection of delusional men prone to sexual perversion and extreme mental and emotional problems >Now compare that to all the people who don't want to cut their dick offWow bro tell me more about how proportions work to avoid just admitting trannies are sex weirdos that need to be treated like the absolute retards they are for everyone's safety
>>954794756Explain the math then.
>>954794745>You can't decide if one transmission is more reliable than the other unless they are the same transmissionAre you fucking reterded?So you can't decide if a Toyota is more reliable than a Nissan because they don't use the same parts?Again, you people are incapable of engaging in good faith debate and will just gaslight, lie, and use every form of pilpul imaginable to derail a debate.
>>954792796Classic "obsessed with per capita" retard that will focus on 5 trannies raping over 500 cis men raping
>>954794832Because he probably is one.
>>954794817>You can't compare two brands of any product type to decide which is more reliable because they use different partsOK retard
>>954791158Sure, it’s not surprising considering they’re mentally ill, narcissistic, and obsessed with sex and porn.
>>954794185>Where the fuck did this number come from? Where did you get 10 if he only ate 1 baby? Are you retarded?no, but I will explain it assuming you arent.One in a population of one hundred thousand eats a baby. (in this hypothetical baby-eating country.) In per capita statistics, in this case of per million, a population of less than a million is multiplied up to reach that one million point. Therefore, when being used for calculation of per capita values, in this case it equates to ten in one million.So, one in one hundred K. two in two hundred K, 3 in three hundred K. and so on. Even though there are not a million people in this country, its being counted as that, "per million" of them in the statistical result. This is the problem of calculating per capita numbers in the per million, when one or another group, is far less than a million. This is one of the tricks people like OP use to create the numbers in a way they want to present, using per capita per million. In a normal calculation, I would've calculated per capita per hundred thousand. In which case, there are 0.495 baby-eaters per 100,000, in country A, and 1.0 per 100,000 in country B. But OP was trying to deceive you, making the per capita number look worse for a smaller group. And that was what I was illustrating make that clear for you to see how that deception is achieved. do you now understand?
>>954794843I already know you're a moron when it comes to math, and biology and history But you don't know shit about cars either?Son, just because a transmission from two different cars from two different manufacturers, the problem may not even be the transmission at all. It might be what fluid both companies are using.
>>954794832>Now imagine you've got a subsection of delusional men prone to sexual perversion and extreme mental and emotional problemsno need to imagine. you're on /b/
>>954794880Nigger do you not understand what a transmission is?
>>954794902When you've got a troon thread going brah it's generally wiser *not* to emphasize just how much in common you have with the troons.
>>954794905More gaslighting nonsense.One of them will always be more likely to break than the other. Yes, there will always be a reason one was less reliable than the other if you investigate.The fact still remains, one is more statistically likely to break than the other.I hate you gaslighting faggots so damn much you can't even imagine.
>>954794921ofc i understand op takes thick, creamy, pozzed transmissions in the ass every day
>>954794921>You can't compare two different products unless they are the same product
>>954794969Okay so this proved you know nothing about what a transmission is. Good to know you're an actual moron.Just because both companies transmission is breaking down doesn't mean you'd know which one is going to break first.
>>954794921Love that he chose the tranny as the car component in his example.
>>954794991KidTransmission breaking down can be multiple factors. And if they're both breaking down that doesn't mean it's the same cause of said problem.
>>954791158>O B S E S S E DThese people are genuinely mentally ill. Absolutely fucking pathetic that this is all they seethe about all day. Cope, trash!
>>954795042He's so fucking stupid. He hasn't been right of anything he's yammering about with his retarded made up scenarios.
>>954795042thatsthejoke.gif.
>>954795085Both things can be true at once. Some Republicans are pedophiles, and most LGBTs are also pedophiles.
>>954795028>You can't possibly know if a piece of shit Nissan Jatco CVT the transmission is going to break before a Toyota CVT>They are different transmissionsGaslighting faggot tranny
>>954795120What does this have to do with what I'm saying?
>>954795096It's just a gish gallop tactic by a crazy man that wants to cut his dick off (unless he gets to rape women in the bathroom of course, then it becomes xer gock)
>>954795160I don't understand what point he's been even trying to make.He doesn't understand biologyHe doesn't understand how to calculate percentages and how per capita worksHe doesn't understand cars He is the most useless person I've come across here and this whole thread is proof he's a moron.
>>954795142Some transmissions are objectively less reliable than others. You can determine this through statistics and rate of failure.You dishonest pieces of shit are trying to pretend statistics that determine a rate in which something happens are nonsense.Nissan CVTs are far more likely to fail than other brands like Toyota according to statistics.Psychotic trannys are far more likely to rape than sane people according to statistics.My initial example used Toyota, the highest selling car brand as an analogy to normal cis-people. I used Lamborghini, an incredibly low volume selling brand that is very rare to represent trannys, because trannys are statistically very rare. Lamborghinis are also famously unreliable.Also transmissions are also called trannys so it is a fun pun.>Back in my day blowing a tranny meant you had car problems!Cope faggot.
>>954795275>Psychotic trannys are far more likely to rape than sane people according to statisticsShow the proof right now.
>>954795318It’s literally in the OP.
>>954795340Did you actually look at it?
>>954795340except the facts >>954792346 show OP's numbers are false.
>>954791158noice. post it on >>>/lgbt/>>954791172chris chan looks different now
>>954791158Now THAT's something to have Pride about!
>>954795402False information?
>>954792346Holy fuck what a retard.You can't use a % of the people in prison being trans as a metric for the rate they rape. People are in prison for all sorts of things.>Thousands of people are in prison for theft or drugs>Therefore that means tranny's rape less
>>954792346>48,000 (0.10%) identified as a trans man>48,000 (0.10%) identified as a trans woman........
>>954792346>the UK records there were 15,897 prisoners for sex offences in 2025.the Office of National Statistics records that there are 24.2 million adult males in the UK in 2025.therefore the calculation would indicate that there is a sex offending rate of 656.9 men per million, not 395What?
>>954795500>You can't use a % of the people in prison being trans as a metric for the rate they rape. People are in prison for all sorts of things.I didn't. I used the UK government's statement that 151 trans prisoners held in jail had convictions for sexual assault. not a percentage. not as a rate. I used the published data to give an exact number of how many there are. >>954795504yes. in the census there were questions on gender.And 118,000 people replied that they were trans, and did not specify trans man, or trans woman. another 48,000 identified as trans, and specified they were Trans men. and another 48,000 people identified as trans, and specified they were trans women. I know, reading comprehension is very hard Timmy. Would you like me to use some puppets to explain it to you?
>>954795693Sure can you explain how many of these people are likely to be autistic based on this article? >>954793038
>>954795568Oh I'm sorry. do you need a hand there? There are 15,897 male prisoners jailed for sex offences there are 24.2 million adult males. to calculate a per capita number, you take value (ie, number of prisoners) and divide it by population. (ie, number of people, in this case, males in the country. you then multiply that by your desired per capita rate. so, if you wanted per 100,000, you multiply by 100,000. if you want per million, you multiply by one million. Value, Population, Unit. ( V ÷ P ) x U = number per capita15,897 ÷ 24,200,000 multiplied by 1 million. equals 656.9 per 1 million. to be more exact, it equals 656.9008264462809 per million, but one decimal point will suffice. would you like me to explain any more basic calculations, or will you be able to work out the rest from there?
>>954796063>There are 24.2 million adult males.How would you know since illegals are everywhere and not counted for?
>>954795753>Sure can you explain how many of these people are likely to be autistic based on this article?no. And here's why not:Because the article does not provide any information capable of being used to calculate any numbers. the sole content about statistics is the following line: >People who are transgender or nonbinary are more likely to be autistic. One large study found that it's three to six times more common. Researchers are working to understand the connection and how society can be more accommodating to people who live at this intersection. It does not state the "large study" authors, in fact, it does not cite it in any way. It does not provide any data on what percentage of people who are NOT trans are autistic. Therefore, there is no baseline number from which the 3-6x can be extrapolated. It is, quite simply, a meaningless statement made by a journalist to get clicks, which doesn't even have much content to the article which is actually about Izzy Dier of San Francisco's anxiety, and Danielle Sullivan of Lafayette, Colo. not fitting in growing up. it has nothing at all to provide in terms data to be used in calculation of statistics. that's why the answer is No.
