ITT: Interesting and unusual stuff that's happening on the boards you visit.Non-happenings, habbenings, haqqenings, small GETs, complaints about shit boards being shit, known spergs sperging out, personal report buttons and blogposting / avatarfagging et al. belong in the nonexistent /nah/ thread at >>>/bant/nahPremium happenings, goldppenings, diamondppenings, rare GETs, great posts from great boards, users loved by everyone, secret meetups with mods and exclusive entries in blog.4chan.org belong in the 4chan pass-only thread at >>>/vip/happeningsPast happenings: https://wiki.bibanon.org/4chan/HistorySee how active 4chan boards are in real time: https://4stats.ioSearch 4chan: https://find.4chan.orgArchives: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/4chanPublic ban archives (no longer updated): http://185.10.68.107:1776/ (4bans) & https://hiddenservice.cc/bans (IPv6 only)Self-serve ads: https://4ch-ads.pages.dev/Enhance your 4chan Experience (no 4chanX): https://rentry.org/4chan_Userscripts_1Enhance your 4chan Archive Experience: https://rentry.org/FoolFuuka_UserscriptsYotsuba catalog: https://catalog.neet.tv/4chan media browsers: https://thread-puller.party/ (Images) & https://www.4webm.org (Webms / [wsg])How to access IRC and contact the mods: https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/1654916/#1690512Previous: >>23509175 | https://archive.palanq.win/bant/thread/23509175/
>belong in the nonexistent /nah/ threadplease correct this lineit's a real thing as advertised here.
>>23523652the /bant/ version isn't really /nah/ and is just too gay for official acknowledgment
whitebois deserve to be cucked for being such retarded cuckoldswhitebois deserve to commit suicide every 5 minutes for being retarded cuckolds LOL
If you wanr to watch Haha You Clowns, which premiered today, you can find a download link here.>>>/co/151012266
>>23523724god im so tired of garbage like this.
>>23523724god im so energized by kino like this
>>23523724god im neither moved postively or negatively by this content
4chan's captcha is reclining again
yo??? grokipedia is uphttps://grokipedia.com/page/4chanhttps://grokipedia.com/page/Christopher_Poolehttps://grokipedia.com/page/Hiroyuki_Nishimura
>>23523897it seems like 4chan always shits the bed around midnight>>23523928not clicking this shit
>It’s time for not only myself to move on, but the community to move on. I really view it as an opportunity for new leadership or the community to kind of go in a direction that I may not have taken it. For better or worse.>Maybe one day we’ll all realize how good we had it.
>>23523928@grok is this truthful
>>23523928Grok the twitter bot?I can see it now. A truly great addition to our post-truth world is an online "encyclopedia" gleamed from AI hallucinations of material that is already half-truths and propaganda gleamed from social media.
>>23523939i'm sure he doesn't regret getting rid of this place but it has to hurt to see what it has become
>>23523939OMG! Kitty! Meow meow! Haha! Kitty cat!!! Meow meow meow!
>>23523897The sys.4chan subdomain is being raped again.
>>23523928Lmfao I didn't know this existed, Musk is INSANELY ass-hurt that Wikipedia exists without any billionaires controlling it
>>23523947It was all fact checked by grok as truthful. Calm your tits.Grok is from xAI, actually. One of the world's most cutting edge AI labs.
>>23523939>Contrary to everybody screaming about free-speech, my point in all of my talks, and verbatim basically quoting myself, Is that anonymous speech enables people to be equal and to say things that they might not otherwise be comfortable sharing on a platform with identity. So that coupled with an ability to reach a large audience without any investment or effort really makes it very, very unique to this (down) of the internet. Hopefully there will be more sites that follow in those footsteps.it's so weird that people actually viewed 4chan as some kind of free speech absolutism website
>>23523991There's a direct line to draw with the "4chan is free speech" sentiment back to the neo-nazis that populated /b/ and /new/ and now /pol/, in the site's glory years no other population would really give all that much of a fuck about seeking asylum on an anonymous imageboard for weebs and hobbyists unless they were chased off of literally every other corner of the internet
>>23523928>misinformation wikiBeautiful
>>23523928this is fucking grim the entirety of India is going to use this and implicitly believe it a big chunk of Americans probably will too
>>23524028rich man good
>>23524028some controversial pages are already 100x better desu but it's probably a giant mess that will never be fixedfuck it we ball
>>23523969>Wikipedia exists without any billionaires controlling itLMAO
>halo tweets>musk retweeting the gamer gate grokipeida article
>>23524067Lol as much as you want but no the Wikimedia Foundation having a strange sense of sourcing and citation on some matters is not the same thing as being an unabashed mouthpiece for specific billionaires like Musk who get mad they DON'T have control over something, some article being on lock or getting rapid-fire changes/reversions is substantially more likely to be from some autist claiming the article as his pet project than it is to be federal or private interest
*ahem*4CHAN happenings?
>But again, maybe going forward, the fact that other imageboards set up... That's a good thing. Should 4chan be ruined by my successors, or die, or something like that, it's probably better that the imageboard market so to speak is a fragmented one, so there's not only one.a lot of interesting stuff i didn't remember in that last Q&A
FOURCHAN: FORTUNE FAVORS THE... APE?
>>23524176Moot was a very smart and forward-thinking fellow and his absence is very keenly felt
>>23524194it's really striking how normal he was and how genuinely interesting the talks he gave could be. he's one of the the least embarrassing web 1.0 figures.
>>23524109>>>/pol/519953123/pol/tard avoids jail for murdering another man by pleading to be mentally insane. A short video of the attack can be found in the thread.
>>23524214what the fuck is wrong with norwegians
>>23523928More like Slopipedia.>>23524109Check pic.
>>23524214Avoided prison but might've gotten it way worse with being sent to the nut-house instead, surprised he has 4chan access there
>>23524237>norwayhe's fine
>>23523930just get noscript and disable js by default broski. then you can click on (nearly) any link.
>>23523897YesIs this message new?
>>23524280No. It happens when you request a new captcha too fast.
>>23523928we are so fucking cooked
>>23524361You live to see horrors beyond your comprehension- Walt Disney
>>23523645Actual happening: Moot named in the most recent release of Epstein Files. Lines up exactly when he became a disenfranchised sellout, and shortly before the main 8exodus.I remember there was a lot of newfags LARPing as oldfag m00t cocksuckers in this protogeneral (as if it changes anything); so hopefully this snaps you out of your love for ol' cuckaduck that you never had to deal with. You'll never fit in.
>>23524932people have been spamming this for a weeki still have yet to give a fuckcancelculture is normie garbage
>>23524932>moot is basedyeah i know
>>23523695>umm acctually you sound like a gigantic nerd who isn't satisfied with anythingbet you could ruin a wet dream
>>>/s4s/12598339>>>/s4s/12598342>>>/s4s/12598353
>>23525026/nah/ was never supposed to be retard blogshit, it was just meta for stuff that wasn't important enough for /hap/
>>23525681Moot doesn't want you to know this, but /nah/'s own existence is in itself /nah/
There are never any happenings here.
>>23524932epstein/maxwell were socialites. there's pictures of them hanging out with the creator of ultima.
>>23525681do you want retard blogshit in /hap/?no?good news, it's contained in /nah/, quit your whining.
>>23525681That's true, but the demographic change meant something new had to happen. Containment is containment, just a different kind.
>>23526166>>23526175I'm all for whatever keeps that shit out of decent threads, I'm just not willing to pretend it's /nah/ because it isn't
>>23526201But /nah/ has been blogging for years. Did you rediscover hap recently?
>>23524932how come he deleted /l/ then
>>23526495he just put it up on another domain for a bit
>>23523928Holy shit what a manchild LMFAO the world is doomed. AI wikipedia. Couldn't make this shit up
>>23523928probably better for controversial articles (GG, cultural marxism) but overall just a joke
>>23526495>Please get rid of /l/, Mr. Poole.>All my clients now want fresh sushi.>I'll give you a yacht and some Japanese islands.
>>23525854Bitch, I posted like 3 happenings last threadThough I have none right now.
>>23526166i know you have some kind of brain damage from substance abuse, but the only retard in here mostly blogging is you anyway/nah/ could also contain tripfags but you just come in here to seek atention. kill yourself
>>23527027>BR Rail IDdoes barzil even have trains?
seen way less csam and other shitty spam last few days, wonder if some antispam stuff got improved or if something else happened
>>23527700i wonder if that's linked with sys going down
>>23527673No, they only have cars that run on rum.
>>23527650erm dilate you stupid entitled faggoti go where i please
The doge show is coming out soon(ish)Early watch party thread:>>>/co/151035630
>>23528018:Dfuck the haters is good(helluva boss too)this is not asking for pleb taste opinions
>>23528018The only way I'd watch this show is if I have a mentally ill girl watch it with me.
>>23528018That's not the doge show.>>23528038You have one inside your head.
>>23528018also they better do a broken tv screen gag on vox or i riot
>/nah/‘ing up /hap/ to blog about some tranny cartoontriptranny moment
>>23528056>That's not the doge show
>>23528018>post about /trash/bin hotel>S0i ID
>>23528018i can't even get hyped, i already know it's just gonna be more gay dramashould have never trusted a fat bitch from deviantart
>>23525681/qa/ also has blogs, but it wasnt /bant/ quality of brain dead necrobumping or tripfag attention whores misappropriating the name. just filter and ignore.
>>23528105/qa/ had threads that were just one tripfag blogging to himself while occasionally people replied "wtf"They went well with the 1000 frog threads with 3 replies
>>23528113>/qa/ had threads that were just one tripfag blogging to himself while occasionally people replied "wtf"where do you think dt learned his schtick
>>23528113but it doesn't exist anymoreand you have wojack niggers to blame for thatcope however you choose
>>23527646Last thread is not this thread.
>>23528102Space King is the superior show
The /bant/ version of /hap/ is slightly worse than the /qa/ version of /nah/
I wish the mods didn't let /qa/ turn into a /b/ variant. I'm sure they regret it too.
>>23528156based
>>23528105>/qa/ also has blogsi wasn't around much but i distinctly remember nah being half nappenings half food blogs/bant/nah would be unironically the closest to /qa/nah it has ever been>>23528156>
>>23528078>the more successful Chris Poole>>23528098>/trash/bin hotellol
>>23528172they made fun of janitors for complaining about it
the sticky has disappeared from /b/
why did they just let /b/ become a porn board anyways?
>>23528482Didn't the fappening cause this?
>>23528487It was the start of the end at least, /b/ was never the same after
>>23528482/b/ was not supposed to have rules. refusal to give it a framework saw /b/tards build their own./r9k/ and [s4s] stealing the "meme" board role sorta sealed their fate.
Sticky: >>>/sp/151677261
>>23528482no jannies and abandoned by mods for /pol/
I wonder if there's some truth to the idea that the Aprils Fools event was an attempt to revive /b/.
/nah/old /v/ celeb gets cucked so hard he's getting deportedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URy7TlbRjF8
>>23528466 it's an unwritten rule again
>>23528713would need to be maintained longterm to actually revive /b/ and drive out the porn spammers
I think I saw a liveleak adjacent webm on /v/>>>/v/724445183Is it reportable? I'm not opening the webm again
>>23528861you can't actually see anything other than just a pool of blood coming in from offcamera after the explosion
>>23528727I recognize the name, but I dunno why. Gives an interesting window into the clusterfuck that is the US immigration system.
>>23528868It was a lot of blood though
>>23528868https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongo_Tongo_ambush?useskin=vectorThat's just bullets digging up the dirt, not an explosion. They put a couple rounds in him to finish him off.This is part of a longer video from that ambush in Niger eight years ago. Green Beret team got cut off and overrun by elements of Islamic State in the Greater Sahara.
I reported it as NSFW on SFW board
>>23528932thank you for your service
>>23528882He was an anon from /v/ that made a lot popular Dark Souls videos back in the early 10s. He also apparently married an complete BPDemonhttps://files.catbox.moe/7ydmu1.txt
>>23528727oh my god, this guy was huge in the ds community back in the day. this is still one of the best meme videos I've ever seen for any game:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyA8odjCzZ4
/hap/? Wikipedia article about /mlp/ was given a small section about Mare Fair and its controversies (that are entirely sourced from a furfag drama blog)said blog is now DDoS'd by some horsefuckerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//mlp/#Mare_Fair_extremist_imagery_and_staff_zoophilia_allegationshttps://desuarchive.org/mlp/thread/42729924
>>23529277The eternal war between horsefuckers and furfags continues. Dunno why they have such beef.
>>23529289>Dunno why they have such beefhorsefuckery is about watching little girl cartoons furfaggortry is about wearing gay animal suits
>>23529301I see that distinction, I just don't know why that engenders such long-lasting hatred. Shouldn't they be united against the normalfags who see them as all the same kind of weirdos? Weebs are kinda going mainstream, but before that happened I'd say all three had a common cause, but you wouldn't know that from the way they dunk on each other online.
>>23529317>Shouldn't they be united against the normalfags who see them as all the same kind of weirdos?who the fuck wants to get approval from normies?
when mlp first happened, i remember thinking they were more annoying than furfags, who had simply largely fucked off from 4chan.t. furfag
>>23529331It blows my mind that s/fur still exists on /b/; that shit existed when I got here back in 2009. It's got to be one of the longest running generals on this entire site.
>>23529336there's seemingly no interaction with /trash/ at all either. i hadn't checked /b/ in decades and i was shocked to see both gfur and sfur there.
>>23529322I think we're losing something in the translation here. I meant a united front *against* the normalfags, commiserating over their mistreatment in the media and praying for the eventual normiecaust.
>>23529349you don't need a "union" to "fight" against normalfagsyou only "unite" when you need approval for your degenerate behavior
>>23529391>[Deleted]?
>>23529277 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=/mlp/&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:/mlp/#Dogpatch_Express_not_a_reliable_source >This article is libelous and contains many factual inaccuracies Wikipedia seriously doesn't care if an article has "factually inaccuracies" because fact-checking or truth isn't their goal Citing "reliable sources" is >it has been used in various news publications without comment for facts; the source and the author have been extensively used by WP:RS like Time (WP:TIME), The A.V. Club (WP:AVCLUB), Rolling Stone (WP:ROLLINGSTONE), and many, many more. Per WP:USEBYOTHERS, which states "The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence. For example, widespread citation without comment for facts is evidence of a source's reputation and reliability for similar facts, whereas widespread doubts about reliability weigh against it." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Usage_by_other_sourcesIt's not an own against Wikipedia, it's literally just how it worksTheir hardline stance on "reliable sources" has benefits and drawbacks, the magnitude of those benefits and drawbacks varies case by case>>23529405Wanted to add more info without double posting
consider that wikipedia considers buzzfeed a valid source
>>23529429https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sourcesTechnically they consider Buzzfeed as "marginally reliable (i.e. neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable), and may be usable depending on context" but Buzzfeed News as generally reliable
>>23529439oh, it seems like they downgraded it then. i swear i remember it being considered trustworthy.
>>23529439corporate media used to farm dubious stories out to turd sites like buzzfeed, then just report on what buzzfeed reported as a form of credibility insurance. that way they could cover risky stuff and if it was wrong, say "well thats buzzfeed for you!". but nowadays, nobody cares about media credibility, so buzzfeed has lost its true purpose
>>23529277Like people said in that thread Corp's been open about being into irl mares for a long time. He's more open about it than he is about being a tulpamancer. I really wish he was smart enough to shut the fuck up about it back when they were setting up Snowpity, Inc. Also he damage controlled in there hard (he made the shitty derpi whataboutism posts)I still respect him for everything he's done for us >for free, but this shit pissed me off.He also coincidentally made this post about pony.tube around the time the line about horse nsfw being allowed was removed from the rules: >>>/mlp/42708384>>23529427The article is poorly written, editorialized/opinionated, and is full of lies. https://archive.is/bQjwj For some reason he's really salty about Corp's failed crypto, which I don't think has been discussed since he gave a presentation on it years ago. Corp was also only very tangentially involved with the silver coins, because Snowpity handled the financials. Everything else was Lunar Harmony, and nobody was "pushing" the coins (they were designed by committee on the board for 10 years of /mlp/ no shit they were popular)
>>23529277very weird that whoever wrote this is more upset about the human swastikas than the bestiality.its not even an expression of support for nazism its just a refrence to the habbo hotel raids
>>23529513On top of this there's an even bigger shitstorm that's yet to hit /mlp/. Aryanne and the other extremist horses are officially illegal at Mare Fair. (so is being a chud)https://github.com/snowpity/Mare-Fair-Policies/commit/1dd0dae5f202ee4004dfe0c29d970bbbd833fa1fI was actually talking on the phone with a friend about the drama when I saw this, and he said it's probably just bullshit added to look good for potential venues. It's not like this will please the furfags and bsky trannies (who have spent the last three years seething about a convention they were never going to attend)In other /mlp/ news Miss /mlp/ started the other day. >>>/mlp/42738507>>23529538>its not even an expression of support for nazism its just a refrence to the habbo hotel raidsThese people are literally incapable of comprehending this.
>>23529542I don't really care about it because im not into MLP but someone should probably add that context to the wiki article
>>23529542>behavior associated with hate groupsanons are members of Internet Hate Machinewill they ban green masks? >>23529555I'm pretty sure that Habbo raids are present on Wikipedia but you can't mention them in context of Mare Fair unless a "reliable source" connects the dots lel
>>23529336>that shit existed when I got here back in 2009. Itit wasn't a general, just one of /b/ many topical threads that had like a 50/50 chance of being lolbanned.it ain't until the thread watcher happens that you could become a "regular" in a single thread.Fun fact: on the topic of /mlp/. Before the thread watchers, one of it's ancestors, the /b/read, actually made custom software to ID each other through anonymity. I think it had forced anon on back then? can't remember.
>>23529561I'm pretty sure you can just site the sources used in the article for the habbo raids.its already mentioned in the article that they were doing this next to swimming pools so unless the person who checks your edit is super anal they will probably leave it up.
>>23529568>I think it had forced anon on back then?forced anon was specifically enabled against pony tripfags on /b/ kek >>23529573>so unless the person who checks your edit is super anal they will probably leave it up.mods WILL be anal article is under scrutiny because of its relation to 4chan and anon edits done to remove a certain subsection of the articleinb4 it gets locked
>>23529568>ain't until the thread watcher happens that you could become a "regular" in a single thread.I'm pretty sure you're wrong, because I distinctly remember people avatarfagging that far back, and it also makes logical sense that the same niggas would end up in the same threads they're interested in multiple times, but I genuinely can't remember when shit happened anymore. It's all a blur.
>>23529513I know nothing of mlp and frankly prefer it that way but it seems there may be a case to be made for exclusion of that section at least currentlyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional_claims_require_exceptional_sources>Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources.Believe it or not I'm no Wikipedia expert, so I don't know how this rule was applied in practice before but the section looks to me like it makes "exceptional claims" and it also only has one sourceHowever, the previous section also only cites one source. Maybe the new section's claims are more "exceptional" or the source is less reliable than the Atlantic, I don't know.If you can also prove that specific claims made by the source are false maybe that can helphttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research>The prohibition against original research means that all material added to articles must be verifiable, in the sense that it must be possible for an editor to find a reliable, published source that directly supports this material.Unless I'm missing something that whole page says that you can't add something to Wikipedia using "original research", it doesn't say you can't use "original research" to argue against using a source in a specific instanceI'd like to believe that Wikipedia would oppose using a source if it can be verifiably proven to be unreliable. They care a lot about that word too, "verifiably", so it doesn't matter at all if something in the cited source article is false, what matters is that it is verifiably false. On the talk page I see there's some evidence provided that supposedly disprove some parts of the cited source and I know as a matter of policy Wikipedia typically cares far more for sourcing than actual factual inaccuracies so I'm curious to see how this developsLastly I want to reiterate I have no horse in this race. I am more interested in Wikipedia policy and procedure than the facts of the matter here
For example some questions I have for Wikipedia are thisIf a section cites only one source article and if it can be verifiably proven that relevant parts of that source article are objectively false, is that grounds to remove the section?Or does the ban on original research totally prohibit users from even contesting the veracity of a source?
i'm getting these every single time
>>23529910I only get them when I post on >/pol/not sure why
>captcha fails evendoe you put in the right answerbased OCD inducing mechanismincel tiny white pecker cucky-oids deserve OCD (the worst mental illness you could possibly get) LOL
What's Vectorman listening to, Happenings thread?
>>23530510https://youtu.be/bCn4XRLnF2U
SWAT Kats is getting a comic book.>>>/co/151030781
>>23530510https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygI-2F8ApUM
>>23530811I could hear that the moment I saw the thumbnail
>>23530510https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aThUfmKQgaY
>Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!I see problems ahead.
>>23531017Incoming wave of decent moderation on some boards and worse moderation on others
>>23531017This is the first new batch of jannies since the hack right?
>>23530811neil ciciriega (internet demigod)
Credit cards are now being accepted again for passes. Gotta pay those new jannies! (oh wait...)https://www.4chan.org/pass
>>23530579Man, do we need to bring back shit only 40 years old remember?
>>23531103If it wasn't secretly a way for bans to stick harder, I might be tempted
what's happening?
>>23531141Very little, so I'll give you three examples of your typical /k/ thread.>>>/k/64361675Informative deep dive on niche subject.>>>/k/64443080Semi-ritualized comfy imageposting thread.>>>/k/64455056/pol/-adjacent current events thread, still higher quality than anything on the topic you would find on /pol/.And in looking for stuff to share, I found a recent example of one of my favorite memes.>>>/k/64449772
>>23531141It's NEW COMIC BOOK DAY.
>>23531347The 'big two'?
>>23531354the (formerly) big two
>>23528967he's socially retarded & she's a whore >>23529910I've never gotten it once yet>>23531354DC & Marvel
>>23531367>S C H O L A S T I C
/g/ happening: microsoft shitting itself
>>23531481>indian company shits the bed
>>23531481It seems like there's been an outage every other day now
>>>/r9k/82953513something big is about to happen.
>>>/v/724487140I thought shit like this wasn't allowed
>>23531669There's nothing wrong with that post and the Kirby thread tho?
>>23531687it's poorly-edited porn, you can see bits of a dick behind the clipart icecream
>>23528727>brown spic pretending to be an anime girlWhat an embarrassment. Deserved.
>>23531481>>23531541Odd coincidence that the large Azure outage comes a week after the large AWS outage
>>23531759read this >>23528967 lmao
>>23531699The image you mention was deleted early in the thread, and now a completely unrelated post was deleted. I blame you for this and I hope you have nightmares tonight.
>>23531803that was already gone by the time i posted
>>23531834I still blame you for being a faggot that uses the thread as a report button.May Canada cease to exist this decade.
>>23531840>May Canada cease to exist this decade.
Saw no-no photos in a /v/ thread that MadThad posted innocently in (under his namefag alias). I hope they were deleted before he saw them.
>>23531840read the IDs, retard
>>23531894>142332 - BasedBooru.png
>>23531964>ID IDwoagh IDception.
>>23531964>BasedBooru
>>23532608hey listen i forget about the filters sometimes
I saw a captcha that said something like "type only the characters with dots above" with a lot more characters than usual below it and it creeped me the hell out seeing that scrambled text. Is this new?
>>23532758Hahahaha fuck south park for their dry repated jokes 2 seasons in a row but THIS is low hanging fruit gonfuck yourself south parrrk
>>23533190It's actually "only type characters with a circle above them" and only appears on some boards.
Mr. /co/'s map is finished.
>>23531481why!?
>>23531840But Anon, Canada isn't real.
>>23523645Someone exposing a pedo on /co/. They seems to be the one spamming the majority of images from that thread. The catbox link is proof.>>/co/151051606
>>23534563>messed up crosslink>>>/co/151051606
>>23534563>>23534571/co/'s loli threads are weird as hell, like these deviantart and youtube accounts obsessed with an extremely niche subject like compiling scenes of characters farting or showing their feet. It's always one autist dumping old images and cropped screenshots until the thread reaches its limit or a mod deletes it.
>>23534571>>23534563not surprised someone that into fictional kids is also into real kids
>>23534584kek this goes for a lot of /co/ adjacent stuff for some reason. very accurate description.
>>23534599>picwhat the fuck
>>23534603i actually thought this guy posted more commonly but i must be the only one that remembers him>The Simpsons females are upset with Drake for dropping a mid album.western cartoons just attract mildly functioning autism for some reason
Since when did /pol/ lose two pages?
>>23534645https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/deleted/deleted/type/op/One of the resident schizos (a frogposter claiming to be a "femanon") flooded the catalog. He does it at least once a week.Some of his threads: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/femanon/deleted/deleted/type/op/
>>23534606is this the same guy obsessed with simpsons girls in ninja costumes? i'm pretty sure there was someone like that somewhere online
for some reason my posts may fail to appear after submitting and getting "success!" messagehad to repost at least 3 posts nownot sure what may be the problem other that 4chan being broken
>>23535067Sometimes your posts may be failing on purpose like that. The system identified it as spam, so it gives you fake success messages to make you think everything's fine. It's mainly done to confuse and slow down bots.
Every post in this thread was deleted but the thread itself was not>>>/vg/544584067https://arch.b4k.dev/vg/thread/544584067what on earth happened there
>>23535271It's a semi-regular occurrence shortly after a thread is archived, probably due to some sort of glitch. I reckon the reason why it's always noticed in /vg/ is that people are more likely to read recently expired threads there
are thumbnails taking forever to load for anyone else
they've been buffering for like 5 minutes now
>>23535575>>23535577think that's just your internet shitting itself
>>23534846it's the same guy, yeah. apparently he just contacts randoms artists and gives them lists of female simpsons characters to draw in ninja costumes.
>>23536065autism is a helluva drug
>>23533190The first time I got a captcha today was one of those, I was still groggy and typed 000000
>>23536190why you those a null?
captcha reclining again
>>23536606is leto's cp bot fucking it up or something
>>>/x/41384343happy halloween
