the no feedback rule is still on

>>58414537
Make a crypro wallet that uses VRF to generate seed phrases

>>58414537
screw you. You are with the team or just idea farming here for your own profit.

File: oraclecube2.webm (2.39 MB, 1126x614)

2.39 MB WEBM

last year it was just jeets making api calls to chatgpt that won all the prizes. this year it will probably be ccip junk that gets preference.
dont have any world changing ideas, i always just did meme projects for these things. but if you want some prize money just do anything with ccip

>>58414556
>Make a crypro wallet that uses VRF to generate seed phrases

What's novel about this? VRF is only useful for onchain, for generating seed phrases for a wallet you can use a number of better solutions than VRF.

>>58414560
> You are with the team
no
> or just idea farming here for your own profit.
Literally says that in OP except I am willing to share any success with idea man. That's rare because in the real world idea men get nothing!

>>58414583
Beats having to roll dice or trust closed source RNG methods.

>>58414563
> last year it was just jeets making api calls to chatgpt that won all the prizes
makes sense chatgpt launched around that time and would have blinded all the judges.

> i always just did meme projects for these things. but if you want some prize money just do anything with ccip
Don't get it wrong, I want to experiment with meme ideas more than writing some boring ccip showcase for chainlink. Also safe to assume that is what the experienced and connected teams are working on already, no point in competing.

Award prizes are secondary really. I just want exposure in order to fundraise presale and launch token on open market with good momentum behind us. So any creative ideas I will consider. In fact the more creative the better.

> magic link 8ball picrel
god I wish it was that simple.

>>58414598
> Beats having to roll dice or trust closed source RNG methods.
Agreed however not really seeing a way to monetize other than awards for this and considering the competition I doubt such a simple concept will win.

>>58414537
I was thinking of a decentralized delivery protocoll, basically a network that cuts out the middleman of doordash/uber/etc

But I'm not sure thats a good idea since food delivery companies don't actually make any profit right? Maybe it would be cheaper for the end consumer i guess

I'm working on a project, I figured I could just do it by myself but wouldn't mind if someone came through and tokenized it so we could start a business, it's all much easier with a partner, anyone here? I just see broken english on the discord

I've got a great idea but I won't say I'm already making it on ICP. How many people are on your team? I get the feeling you're just going to say you're making it, then pump and dump the shitcoin

Do you have a telegram or something else where I can contact you? If I was idea guy and worked on it surely I'd get more of a share right?

>>58414553
you mean no sneedback :}

>>58414604
alright i just came up with an idea, let me know:
some kinda pvp game between chains on ccip
>each chain is a faction with a base that must be defended
>players of a faction can spend tokens to boost defense of their chain's base and buy upgrades
>players can launch an attack from their own chain, to an enemy chain (thats the ccip part)
>maybe some kinda loot system if your attack is successful
idk what the game mechanics would look like, but a pvp game between chains where everybody joins the faction of their favorite L2 would be cool
stinkylinky420@protonmail.com if youre interested.
i havent touched any programming stuff since last hackathon, but if you wanna work on something ill start now so i wont be as rusty when the hackathon starts

>>58414537
I've had an idea for a while that is needed, but lack the know-how to implement it.

A protocol that allows wallets to transfer permissions between one another.

What do I mean by this?

Say I staked my link tokens using xx wallet, and that wallet is compromised. I would have to hopefully withdraw from staking and send those tokens to a new wallet, but I would lose my staking spot because Onchain doesn't recognize the new wallet as being whitelisted. I could work something out one-on-one with Chainlink, but that is the unintuitive solution compared to auto on-chain.

Another use is airdrop farmers. The farmer knows airdrop will be worth xx dollars, but doesn't want to wait out the time to get the airdrop. They could sell the permissions to receive the drop to another wallet for a % less of what the total value would be.

I believe there's an entirely untapped market in this.

File: 1690746759195891.jpg (48 KB, 750x1334)

48 KB JPG

>>58414537
Dynamic NFTs for specific Twitter handles that use the pinned tweet for that account as a prompt for an AI image generator and the resulting image is the NFT. The image updates whenever the pinned tweet changes.

>>58414710
Ledger user huh? Your best bet is to withdraw now and transfer those linkies to your new wallet and hope that holding them in that wallet for 6 months will allow you into Early Access. Seriously go and unbond right now if you havent done so, its about 7 months from December as of right now.
>Say I staked my link tokens using xx wallet, and that wallet is compromised. I would have to hopefully withdraw from staking and send those tokens to a new wallet, but I would lose my staking spot because Onchain doesn't recognize the new wallet as being whitelisted. I could work something out one-on-one with Chainlink, but that is the unintuitive solution compared to auto on-chain.

If the first wallet is compromised it doesn't make sense to accept any commands from it. You would have to personally ask CLL to whitelist your new wallet which I'm sure they don't have time for.

>>58414537
OP hit me up on telegram. Involves
>price feeds
>randomness
has a normie-facing usecase and solves real world problems

>>58414537
What's your skillset, anon? Not for the hackathon, but I might have something for you in a BUILD project that is being put together.

>>58414638
>>58414741

Just made public TG for anyone who wants to join: biz_dev_collab

Keep in mind it is bare bones for now and I want to use these threads for better collection of thoughts and ideas and discussion but a tg is good to have so there ya go.

>>58414537
Scratch that, I just read your post. How are you at React?

>>58414755

I have exp with React but ditched it a year ago in favor of Sveltekit. Haven't looked back since. Fuck React. Sveltekit is better in almost every single way especially for web3.

>>58414615
>decentralized delivery protocoll, basically a network that cuts out the middleman of doordash/uber/etc
I don't get it. Who exactly is the middle man for uber? Uber? If so then how will this app monetize if they aren't charging a fee to use the service.

In any event this type of idea is better served for the creation of a specialized blockchain not a Dapp running on an already existing L1/L2. Not to mention the feasibility of building that type of project is too longtail and not worth it.

Creating the 'uber' of something has investor fatigue.

>>58414763
cool I've joined the tele, I'm waiting on important news but I'll message you in a week depending on how it goes.

File: 1706892546456865.jpg (215 KB, 792x948)

215 KB JPG

excuse me stinkies
stop discussing ideas and networking
it's pathetic
if your crypto was any good you wouldn't need to roll up your sleeves and do all the work yourself

>>58414634
Funny because the last hackathon I did was for ICP a year ago, it's where I was forced to use Sveltekit >>58414763 and fell in love.

>I've got a great idea
Anon, do not fall for the "my idea is such a game changer differentiator that I have to keep it secret..." fallacy.

That shit never works. Ideas are worth $0. Even if you came up with Uber in 2001, you would never have succeeded. Execution is everything so stop being afraid of someone else stealing your idea. That other person STILL has to execute and very likely will not.

>>58414781
>I'll message you in a week depending on how it goes
No problem. The TG is more of a direct email system anyways. These threads will be where I hope the gist of all this will live.

>>58414676
..eating, will reply back with time, thanks for the idea

>>58414710
Good idea but outside the scope of this thread and particularly the hackathon. Still I agree someone will build something like this if they are already not doing so.

>>58414732
..eating, will reply back with time, thanks for the idea

>>58414676
Liking this idea so far.

>players of a faction can spend tokens to boost defense of their chain's base and buy upgrades
Good idea.

>maybe some kinda loot system if your attack is successful
Where exactly is this "loot" system paying you from?

What dev skills are you most comfortable with? Remember, no ones perfect also definitely start touching shit now so you won't be rusty.

>>58414732
>Dynamic NFTs for specific Twitter handles that use the pinned tweet for that account as a prompt for an AI image generator and the resulting image is the NFT. The image updates whenever the pinned tweet changes.
I like this idea as well. But there is a flaw I think. Since image generation is practically open-source and models can be edited to produce differing results, what exactly prevents a Twitter handle's exact same pinned tweet yielding multiple different images from multiple different models?

At that point it's a game of which model produces the most captivating image. The Twitter handle will then choose the better image and advertise those guys exclusively.

I guess for a hackathon though it's not bad. Although I would have to go over last year's submissions to make sure someone hasn't already done this type of shit already as this anon alluded to something about last year being full of AI projects >>58414563

>>58415028
>Where exactly is this "loot" system paying you from?
just tokens or something (minted or could come from what the defenders used to buy upgrades)
maybe NFTs too

>What dev skills are you most comfortable with?
basic react (did a couple projects with it, but dont know the fancy stuff like redux and stuff)
basic next.js (used it for all my web3 projects as well for routing, but there is a bunch of new stuff im hearing about that i havent looked into yet)
javascript (i tried to get into typescript but it seemed pointless for small solo projects so gave up)
solidity (ive done erc20/erc721 projects before. im pretty comfortable with it but when things get low level and people start messing around with bits and bytes i get confused)

ill start practicing again tomorrow. im getting drunk tonight. email me if you wanna do something, even if its something else not for this hackathon, i need an excuse to get back into this. i have some old projects i want to revive too.

>>58414537
How is this even remotely a question?

Start a shitcoin/rugpull cross-chain dex using CCIP. So fucking easy. You'll make millions of dollars, forget the hackathon. Imagine if you could not have to buy BASE ETH for example but buy BASE shitcoins with your regular ETH or BNB or AVAX or whatever.

Just abstract away the chains and have a shitcoin casino. It'll also drastically pump LINK's token value. I can't fucking believe nobody has done this yet it makes me furious.

>>58415144
>Start a shitcoin/rugpull cross-chain dex using CCIP
Anon an idea like this is almost certainly being developed as we speak either by completely separate teams or by the industry leaders like dextools/dexscreener who have the revenue to pay for a separate team of devs to build this out and a platform to adopt their customer base into paying users.

To compete against the giga talent and giga funds behind the Dex game is a losing endeavor.

I agree the idea is great but not worth attempting imo.

File: Stakingv02Criteria.png (283 KB, 942x1262)

283 KB PNG

>>58414710
>>58414734
>Ledger user huh? Your best bet is to withdraw now and transfer those linkies to your new wallet and hope that holding them in that wallet for 6 months will allow you into Early Access. Seriously go and unbond right now if you havent done so, its about 7 months from December as of right now.

Don't do this. Either use do a Chainlink Functions testnet Transaction with a wallet you plan to stake with or do a CCIP testnet transaction or mint a POAP token from one of their hackathon workshops. OR email CLL and ask on their discord if you can greenlight a wallet while demonstrating you own an early access qualified wallet. It's too late for the "hold for 6 months" qualification.

>>58414615
>>58414779
>I don't get it. Who exactly is the middle man for uber? Uber? If so then how will this app monetize if they aren't charging a fee to use the service.

Recreating Uber with smart contracts is an idea I've been wanting to get on but I'm too prioritized with other stuff to join the hackathon to work on. But the core benefits are

> You can use crypto instead of payment processors for transactions
> You can give drivers a real stake in the network via tokenomics

>>58415447
REAL SHIT

I missed out on staking cause i moved my linkies to a different safer wallet out of the time period

Don't move em, try to contact em since you have plenty of time to do get them to whitelist you

>>58415459
I recommend the contacting CLL suggestion as a last resort, we have plenty of time to generate Builder Early Access wallets.


I personally plan to start farming wallets next month.

>>58415216
just build an MVP can't take more than a couple weeks if you grind it out. Look what pumpdotfun did in a couple weeks, within 1M of launching they were doing $2MM in revenue

>>58414537
Hey anon I was thinking about entering the Chainlink hackathon to explore a project related to LPL and the Jonny Bollocks NFT collection.

Now I know this will make a few that fucking missed out after we fucking told them seethe but this is my destiny I know it.

Basically I want to curate the rarest Jonny Bollocks AI generated limited edition NFTs into a special Link Marines + LPL chuddie kiddos only collection.

This may include occult references and so it is not for the uninitiated. Schizos may apply and there has been a lot of talk in the LPL chuddie kiddos general that the recent email verification is just another attempt by glow niggers to censor and control based LPL chuddie kiddos so big shout out to LPL chuddie kiddos how you doing based kiddos chuddie pools fucking closed haha based and lets do out best on this hackathon project because I know it will be the best yet ever.

That's my brainstorm. I am a code expert and web3 god so I know about the LPL chuddie kiddos and how based they are and how they buy up any LPL related project then close it down.

What if we attach numbers with occult references to AI generated Jonny Bollocks limited edition LPL chuddie kiddos NFTs?

Could that be the next BTC or even a limp ETH?

What if I used AI to write a LPL themed novel so I could become the next based LPL chuddie kiddo or the next Stephan King?

>>58415489
Why has no one done it yet? Including the pumpfun devs?

I agree pumpfun has made web3 dev shit lucrative again. However the idea and execution was well above a simple "connect all chains with ccip so we can shitcoin without bridging" concept.

>>58415447
>>58415459
>implying sergay gives a shit about you being able to steak
Its a decentralized oracle network. Picking and choosing who gets into the pool is the antithesis of web3 and all that it stands for. You honestly believe that a billionaire is going to take time away from his harem of HR roasties so that he can solve your personal issue?

>>58415501
> spam post about shit I have no clue even exists
Yeah anon, I have no clue wtf you're even talking about.

>>58415550
>spam post
Anon... I posted once.
>about shit I have no clue even exists
Holy newfag! I know you probably just missed out on LPL and are now seething uncontrollably
>Yeah anon, I have no clue wtf you're even talking about.
Reread my post its right there. LPL... Chuddie Kiddos... ring a bell?

Way to reveal you're a newfag anon kek. Based LPL chuddie kiddos know

>>58415637
Sorry Anon not a newfag. Newfags are the only ones who mess with NFTs. That shit is for 2021 babies. I could give a fuck about NFTs.

>>58415654
Based 42 retired from NFTs and LPL... they are no joke anon. Many other nameless anons retired from LPL and NFTs.

But anyways NFTs are just in addition to the full SEC approved revenue sharing, early access build drops, and exclusive live stream access LPL chuddie kiddos get... most of that is automated so we need something to exercise our creative abilities.... cue NFTs.

Fucking based AI generated limited edition LPL Jonny Bollocks NFTs are the future anon and if you disagree you are a dirty fudder from Bulgaria.

You didn't even know about LPL... must be a newfag from the after time. Before time chuddie kiddos know LPL is life.

... big shout out to LPL chuddie kiddos how you doing based kiddos chuddie pools fucking closed lol LPL seethe!

Anyways good luck being a newfag anon...

>>58415513
Anon, I've personally gotten a wallet greenlit after asking on the basis that my initial wallet wasn't as secured as my new wallet.

Sergey obviously won't put any effort into this, but this is what the HR is hired for.

>>58415717
And again, it's a last resort. We have a billion and 2 ways to get a builder wallet.

A smart contract platform that aligns your investment portfolio with the movements of celestial bodies, using astrology API calls. Investments could be balanced based on moon phases or planetary alignments, with Chainlink price feeds providing real-time asset pricing. this will get all the schizos and astrology fags on /x/. @ Sirusse on tg

File: gigakek.jpg (96 KB, 1500x1200)

96 KB JPG

>>58414537
>Chainlink

>>58414537
The Chainlink functions API is too difficult to implement as a developer. Ever wonder why Chainlink isn't used for API calls in defi? To properly trust-minimize the data, you need the same data point provided by 3 separate data providers. Considering each query would be done by multiple nodes on Chainlink, a single data point could take 9 API calls.

Now write the contracts to manage the logic and upkeep of the payment with error handling, etc, and a very simple app becomes a multi-month development project with management requirements.

Fuck!

I designed a solution for this that could be revolutionary for developers, allowing for simple, streamlined API->trust minimization via Chainlink development in minutes. if you want to build this hmu @trustless_nyc on X, may not see messages here

>>58416335

>A smart contract platform that aligns your investment portfolio with the movements of celestial bodies, using astrology API calls. Investments could be balanced based on moon phases or planetary alignments, with Chainlink price feeds providing real-time asset pricing. this will get all the schizos and astrology fags on /x/. @ Sirusse on tg

Good Idea but not sure how getting Celestial and astrology data would translate to a direct investment strategy. Cause if it's completely up to my discretion than on any full moon I can just tilt all investments to buy ETH which is arbitrary.

>>58414537
Hello OP. I have 2 years of experience in solidity and I am searching for frontend guys to participate with me. I have used price feeds and VRF before.
my tg: PancitSurfer

Some ideas I have:

Payment system that supports subscriptions, and uses Automation for the regular payments and CCIP for payments across networks.

on-chain prediction market that uses chainlink functions to get results of events.

leveraged tokens: for example: 2xETH token that has double volatility of ethereum. we could leverage aave for that

safe lottery: basically a DAO where users can send stablecoins in exchange of shares, and the dao is responsible for investing in different defi protocols. But the yield is accumulated in a jackpot that is released once every week, and the winner is selected via VRF. Users can remove their principal from the dao at any moment without penalty.

>>58417386

> Payment system that supports subscriptions, and uses Automation for the regular payments and CCIP for payments across networks.
Decent idea, a little boring though and likely being worked on by others.

> on-chain prediction market that uses chainlink functions to get results of events.
Derivative of other projects and to be honest this seems like way too much work in what little time we have left

> leveraged tokens: for example: 2xETH token that has double volatility of ethereum. we could leverage aave for that

No comment on this.

> safe lottery: basically a DAO where users can send stablecoins in exchange of shares, and the dao is responsible for investing in different defi protocols. But the yield is accumulated in a jackpot that is released once every week, and the winner is selected via VRF. Users can remove their principal from the dao at any moment without penalty.

This is interesting and could easily spin off into a real world project. Still as another anon pointed out using CCIP should be a primary focus as the judges will likely key in on projects that incorporate it this year.

Feel free to join the TG and spit ball some ideas. There are a number of anons there already, all friendly and of like mind.

>>58416954
Will keep you in mind if the idea we ultimately decide on involves Chainlink functions.

File: 1697222451783636.jpg (1.55 MB, 3024x2524)

1.55 MB JPG

>>58415043
I think the alpha in a product like this is that it allows popular or up and coming twitter accounts to cash in on their clout. This is similar to Uber or Airbnb allowing car owners and home owners to cash in on their illiquid capital in a way they couldn't before, only with this it'd be social capital. Only an account owner can mint NFTs for their account and then they can sell them to fans. If buyers were able to use the NFTs as profile pics or banners that'd be cool too.

>>58415501
>>58415503
>>58415637

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

>>58417476
I think you're underestimating my proposal, I'm talking about an API transformation platform that allows developers to cheaply and easily instantiate an endpoint that they can pay on-demand for data. It's a business proposition that adds real value to the Chainlink and the smart contract space, as well as enables an easy solution that allows you to capture value (charge a premium per call in exchange for generating/deploying contracts+ keeping the system funded)

>>58417754
I think Chainlink Functions is fairly easy to use. Their previous Any API was a pain in the ass to run. You had to get in contact with a node operator and make sure their Job adapter link was working. And I heard External adapters were absolutely miserable to work on.

Right now, my only qualm when I played around with Functions was you couldn't use any node packages. You could only send data to a contract directly from an API call. It sounds like a nothingburger but if you're using Javascript, you're going to be using node packages.

>>58418586
In other words, I don't actually understand your proposal and the problems you're highlighting regarding Functions.

>>58414537
Power your dilator with LINK, Mr Advocate.

>>58414785
Seriously it reminds me of GME zombies talking about how they need to buy batteries and controllers from Gamestop to help the dying company

>>58418617
SOLD my LINK bag for PYTH and just waiting for other oracles like SUPRA

>>58414537
API, Docusiign and Invoice record creation

Once apprived Contracts are signed. Commission assigned and invoiced to Salesperson.

Good for schemy type businesses like MLM who want people selling fast.

>>58421293

hmm sounds like an actual utility. How likely are salespeople (usually boomers), going to be to adopting crypto tho? If you're speaking completely about the hackathon tho then disregard.

Is there an automatic crypto payment system existing already, based on smart contracts? Here is an example. I am a dad of 2 kids and lets say I have 4000 linkies staked or just sitting in a wallet and some other coins. My kids are around 20 years old now. And I might die anytime, I am over 50.

I would like to have a smart contract created in my wallet (or a smart contract that can encompass few of my wallets, e.g. few ETH wallets, few Arbitrum, few BSC) that has some UI where I can set a rule for coin transfer from my wallets to my kids wallets. E.g. while I am alive, I will go once a year to that smart contract UI and do some transactions manually to my kids wallets (e.g. distribute LINK staking rewards). Or I will have some rule and I will execute those rules manually. I guess I would have to sign a message every time with my wallet (I don't know how "login" to a smart contract works).

When I die, If no one has logged in to that smart contract after a year, smart contract will start distributing tokens from my wallet to my kids wallet according to my rules. Rules would be e.g. send 5% of each token to my kids wallets every year and after 20 years, my wallet should be empty and ownership (I guess my keys) should be sent to my kids. Is something like this possible? Of course, your UI will charge some amount for this service every time when a transfer occurs.

>>58422708
This is needed.

Idea goes well with occult theme and "Block Magic", it can be named "Dead Mans Smart Contract" or something like that.

>>58418591
You must realize that trust minimization only happens when you have multiple API calls to multiple data providers for the same data point. IMO the smallest acceptable number of API calls for a single trust-minimized data point is 9 calls with aggregation logic.

Functions is still burden, solidity developers shouldn't need ANY info about Chainlink to get the data they need into their system. What if there was an easy, fast, cheap solution that allowed developers to just hit a digital 'vending machine' and pay per-call for the API call they need. You can charge a premium for each call as you manage the real-world payment for the API subscriptions.

There must be a platform to streamline and manage the API subscriptions on behalf of the blockchain consumers.

The developer experience could be as easy as simply using a web interface similar to rapidAPI that generated the contracts/logic needed to maintain these endpoints, then the developer/consumer would simply pay per-call for the implementation in their contract.

We're talking about perhaps a thousandfold reduction in the amount of work for developers that need trust-minimized API calls on-chain.

>>58422708
Sounds doable. I don't know off the top of my head of the contract moving your Link tokens out of your wallet directly to your kids wallet, But Chainlink Automation can handle the distribution out no problem if you don't sign a message to let the contract know you're still alive.

https://crontab.guru/

This is what Chainlink automation (formerly keepers) is based off of.

>>58422744
You want to create a marketplace for APIs to be used on blockchains? Am I reading this correctly?

>>58423302
You want to create a marketplace for APIs to be used on blockchains? Am I reading this correctly?

Yeah, basically an easy gui API config tool that puts all the successful API integrations into a public library. Most Web3 devs would just hit a solidity endpoint with a few and the API params.

Smart contracts could just hit an endpoint and pay per call.

>>58423339
The reason why Chainlink has such a convoluted way of delivering the API data point to a smart contract, via broadcasting it to the Chainlink network first, is to guarantee the delivery is secure and tamperless.

Do you plan on building on top of chainlink functions to make your super easy to use GUI or plugin? Or going from scratch?

>>58423400
Building functions, maintaining the subscription, aggregating the response of the data providers, handling error cases, ensuring compatibility with the Chainlink network, and providing cost info on a per-call basis rather than retrieving a quote for each call...

It's a lot of contract generation/deployment/back-end work, + the front-end would need to be as intuitive as possible.

Here's a demo I made in figma:
https://www.figma.com/proto/5MdzDFmFlVgf1MAcapTqpq

>>58423400
Sorry, all that is to say that yes, the tool would just abstracts functions. Chainlink is cool but honestly not even devs should need to know shit about it to use it. The goal is enabling a dumb dev to go from zero to hitting a new API endpoint within 5 minutes from scratch.

>>58423440
I actually talked to Max Melcher about this, the lead dev of functions, but he didn't seem to get that the developer experience was impossibly difficult for would-be integrations

I would have liked to raise capital to build this, maybe I could ask around as I'm in NYC

>>58423440
WTF MY LINKS ARE GONE

>>58422708
Are you the guy from our TG? He pitched the dead man switch idea same as yours. Think he's working on it actually.

Wonder how much would you pay for this service?

>>58422708
with the way oracles are now they aren't caught up to actually do this. it's not a blockchain problem it's a regular business handling this for you and if you know about holding your keys then why not just do it yourself for free
your kids are still going to need to hold on to their keys somehow

>>58423678
>with the way oracles are now they aren't caught up to actually do this
yes they are

I've been wondering... I have a kind of RWA project that I've been doing and I've seen that it could be used in the Hackaton as long as it is an improvement on an existing project.
What are some stuff that I could do with RWA narrative and Chainlink services?

>>58423442
>>58423440

Oh okay. This reminds me of HoneyComb, an API market place when Chainlink Network first deployed. But they didn't take off. That was when Chainlink had Any API which was a pain to use and the developer tools, guides, and community was way smaller.

I think the industry would be ready for something like this now since even Steve Ellis wants more projects adopting Functions. He talked about lamenting how no one used AnyAPI much before he introduced Functions at ETH Denver in 2022 (or 2023?) I believe. You could probably get a Chainlink Grant to work on this even outside of the hackathon. This is a really cool idea.

File: cff8.png (158 KB, 450x240)

158 KB PNG

I guess what you guys are saying is... if we want $1000 eoy, we have to do it ourselves... we have to MAKE chainlink worth $1000. because if we don't do it... who will?

>>58423686
no real world data life or death oracles exist

>>58423740
but see, anon, the oracles COULD do that. but no one has implemented it yet... and maybe YOU could be the first :^)
isn't chainlink great?

>>58423741
yes one day that would be great, obviously im thinking about projects that can be submitted today

>>58423750
well get to work fren :^)

>>58423689
Anyone with an idea for this? I've been looking into dynamic NFTs that correlate to a rental property.

>>58424042
Would need more details as to what your original project is to figure out which Chainlink services you should use.

Or you can just read the different Chainlink services they offer and choose whichever you can incorporate into your project.

>>58424354
Ok, about the project: I have some rental properties that I'm willing to rent for USDT, DAI, even Bitcoin. I want to make smart contracts to integrate into the payment system.
The value of the rent should change based on the feautres of the property, and that is why I might want to use dynamic NFTs,. They allow me to set onchain, the aspects that might change the price of the property.

There are dead mans switch solution already existing, but I am not trusting some centralized email provider with my keys. Or any other crypto solution that is not 100% trustworthy. I trust only Chainlink, theit middle name is TRUST and I guess someone should use that trust and make a solution for a dead man switch (although I don't trust my kids, if they get one time payment, they will sell it right away, that is why I proposed automatic rule payments). I would pay 1 link for each payment (when Link is above 50$ or $50 if it is below). I am expecting LINK to be above $1000 by the time I die, but you never know.

File: GKKvUaSaQAAy09C.jpg (80 KB, 720x720)

80 KB JPG

Human beings are created in the image of God. That is to say we reflect the light of the Logos, and the Logos reflects our light as well.

An interesting idea: Creating smart contracts centered around the ultimate creative energy of the Logos. From an intellectual perspective, the logos, at its most fundamental level, exists as the pure field of free will from which creation manifests.

You can do quite literally anything with that potential. In the context of this conversation, the most relevant and meaningful applications of that potential (imo) would be to create a social contract fundamentally based around free will. This is not only a good idea on paper, it also reflects secular theology (which most people believe doesn't exist).

A social contract centered around free will exposes what some would call a "hidden" nature of reality, which is the existence of angelic and demonic forces. Energy that harmonizes itself with free will is angelic. Energy that infringes upon the free will of another is demonic. Simple.

There would be the logistics of reflecting every single interaction that could occur in a society into a digital system, and also every interaction you could have between one or more people. AI might be able to accelerate the solution here.

I think translating this into the chainlink economy would work itself out so that the in-demand inputs from chainlink DON's are individuals openly expressing their free will, in all forms, to the newly created data economy. These free will inputs would then be worked upon by smartcontract systems, hopefully one in which all of society is being automated in rightful accordance to the inputs of every individual.

And I'll say it more clearly: if this doesn't get worked out, Lucifer strengthens his grip of control over people that should have been free

>>58424797
>(although I don't trust my kids, if they get one time payment, they will sell it right away, that is why I proposed automatic rule payments)
very smart father

ohhh I just had an idea, theres the ENS, how about making a CCIP solution for aggregating different naming services that will probably crystallize?

so website.eth and the same website on bnb as website.bnb would be aggregated as website.blink (blockchain-link) or smth

>>58426387
Sorry mate, I've got no clue what the heck you're talking about. How would you define free will through smart contracts?

>>58427036
Wow this may be the best idea ITT that could actually win a prize. Unfortunately I wouldn't even know where to begin. And there is only 8 days to do research and build an MVP.

>>58427845
Well at its simplest, it would be a webcrawler that hashes websites, and the websites that have the same hash would be aggregated as the same. Mmm actually thinking longer about it, im not so sure anymore, its basically indexing it, idk why we would need ccip. I guess making it trustless? Ie making sure you actually get referred to an official website, since a non decentralized indexer could plant fakelinks

>>58427843
Start looking at the world as a contract, it's a good exercise which will take you far in the future of developing smartcontract societies.

There's demand for social justice. You are unwittingly participating in a social contract which you haven't had much say in defining (everything really is jewed). Society imposes its demonic will on you. But also, if you don't seek to serve society, you impose your demonic will on society, at least in the Western world (taking everything and giving nothing paradigm).

I guess the profit incentive would be quite obfuscated. But it comes from the desire for freedom and is also resonant with the positive aspects of the 4th industrial revolution. Which is creating the digital conception of the logos as the only source of free will, and harmonizing the already existing invisible world of contracts with it.

From a fundamental spiritual perspective, free will comes into form, or definition, by distorting itself into desire. By mapping and creating a digital simulacrum of all possible human desires, we could have a transparent reflection of society in the form of an internet of contracts.

Now ALL human desires is a little farfetched. But human desires as they interface with society, especially as its relevant to inequity, seems a bit more realistic. Maybe create a network where people report perceived social inequity to a system that's striving to become a complete simulacrum of society, in the form of digital contracts?

Free will defines itself, quite literally, by its degree of freedom. If smartcontracts are computing that free will is being demonically imposed on others, the network reflects that and proposes solutions that would help restore balance

>>58429662
>Maybe create a network where people report perceived social inequity to a system that's striving to become a complete simulacrum of society, in the form of digital contracts?

Easier said than done. I agree with a lot of what you wrote but practically doing this is not easy, nor will it garner the attention and interest that it deserves. Would need to gamify this tremendously.

File: 1698194116875593.jpg (134 KB, 1024x1024)

134 KB JPG

>>58427866
I know next to nothing about how ENS and domain registars work. Would need to do research.

>>58427845
Yeah so I fudged the timeline. The hackathon concludes on June the 2nd!

For some reason I thought it was May the 2nd.

This changes a lot as the scope of the ideas can increase a bit more now.

Keep them coming frens. I have already decided an idea to work on but I am thinking about post hackathon ideas as well.

Thank you all who have contributed with their thoughts!

>>58427866
>>58430312
>I know next to nothing about how ENS and domain registars work. Would need to do research.
It seems chainlink already included it in their example codes lol so its kinda moot

>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/ccip-cross-chain-name-service?tab=readme-ov-file

i got an idea for a chainlink game :}
it's an oracle that detects the tears of linkies, crying from their massive opportunity costs of holding stinklink over the years :}