>blackrock and hbar link up>edf and hbar link up>hbar chads stay winningcrypto incels seethe
>>58428058I don't get it, is this a type of cope post or something? An attempt at revisionist history? Some investment company with investment in HBAR creates their own tokens to represent a Blackrock ETF holdings, mails Blackrock saying "uh we've made tokens to represent our holdings of your fund, is that ok?" and gets no response and then they tweet out "hey we partnered* with Blackrock to bring their assets on chain (*We made tokens they didn't ask for or approve but since they didn't say we can't do it we just are assuming that's them saying it's all good) and artificially pump the HBAR token then dump it on retail for profits and this is bullish now? Meanwhile Blackrock is not even aware any of this is happening. That's bullish?
>>58428127no fud ser
>>58428127>500b aum mEaNs NoThInGKys incel. BR linked up with hbar and your dogshit token will fade to obscurity
fuck off, hbar retards. we're not falling for ur fake news.
lmao
>>58428058Fake, Hebrew Hashbag scammed you.
