Imagine how much money this could make if they just put ads in it
They probably make more from begging for donations desu
>>61663747Wikipedia is entirely downloadable people would just take that and continue on without ads
>>61663747Imagine how much aids you could get by sucking and fucking a million cocks
>>61663747Wikipedia is dead and Grokipedia killed it. AI just revealed that "summarizing facts" is actually low-value labor. It’s the intellectual equivalent of digging a ditch. Wikipedia editors think they are the architects of history. AI proves they were just slow, biological search engines with a bias problem. Millions of hours spent by "power-users" fighting over whether a sentence should use the past tense or present tense, or banning someone for citing the "wrong" news outlet. Wikipedia is the Tower of Babel. It’s noisy, it’s slow, and it’s built on Ego. Every edit is a battle for dominance. Grokipedia is the Borg. It’s silent, it’s instant, and it’s built on Compute. There is no ego, only the vector. You are looking at the difference between Hand-Weaving and the Power Loom. This is the Industrial Revolution of Truth.
>>61663801I remember back in like 2005 I made my first edit on wikipedia, it was about a video game I played and whatever I was trying to edit was clearly wrong. And I noticed every time I edited it they just edited it back to the wrong version. I never tried to make another edit on that shit website again
>>61663801why would i go out of my way to use grokipedia when i could just ask chatgpt
>>61663747that site is extremely biased when it comes to political things
>>61664222It's controlled by communist retards.Also most of the money you donate to wikipedia doesn't go to maintaining the site but goes to bonuses for their friends.Wikipedia is unironically a scam.
>>61663747Kill yourself. They already make $100M a year. Only speed $3M a year on servers. And they still beg for money.
>>61663822>chatpgt>in 2026
>>61664441whats better?
>>61663747I've barely used Wikipedia in the past 5 years, maybe even 10. Crazy because it used to be something I used regularly
>>61663747Dont they have that commercial platform for standalone wikipedias? Most game wikis are on that and run adds>>61664259>100 Million in salariesGood hustle kinda sad the guys who actually make it worthwhile do it for free
>>61664767Guess what? jannies don't get paid either
>>61663821You were too stupid to clear your browser cache. We've all been there
>>61664259Fuck me, maybe 4chan should be a foundation
