We need moral completely unhinged radical feminism in comics and cartoons, like the mentally ill kind specifically.
Women have bussy envy. That's why they poon out after too much yaoi.
>Couple-busting: SCUM will barge into mixed (male-female) couples and bust them up.Kek oh wow, whoever wrote this has either never known what love feels like, or wrote it in the aftermath of a bad breakup.
>>152352023We already have enough as it is.
Read Hothead Paisan!
>>152352080Valerie Solanas was a crazy bitch
>>152352023If women all wanna be sexless dykes then i dont see anything wrong with making them fuck us by force
>>152352089Same thoughtcropped forgot there was a cock
how does she imagine sewer work would b automated?
>>152352305Most people that have grand visions for humanity don't have time for petty unimportant details such as how everyone is going to be fed, clothed, housed, or such minor issues such as sanitation, knowledge gaps, and manual labor. That's for the proles to worry about, since they'll no longer exist.
>>152352023I love how the super-macho brute is depicted as a Viking when Viking society was objectively the most woman-friendly in Europe.
>>152352023This comic confirms why feminists deserve to be raped and beaten within an inch of their misbegotten lives
>>152352023Why do these sorts of authors always fail to account for opposition to their activity? Especially violent opposition in the event that they try to push their ideology on others by force?
>>152352147Lol
>>152352023>males have made a shitpile of the world>using the written word invented by men to write this>posting it on the internet created by menwow
>>152352387Based and true.
>>152353991The internet didn't exist when Solanas wrote the SCUM manifesto.>>152352611Mental illness.
>>152352023Just imagine its you talking about women and how much you are enjoying it.
>>152352611All extremists are like that by the end of the day, they forget that the world belongs to the living, not the dead. They think their "inevitable" rule will somehow be uncontested, a true "end of history" scenario. They are ultimately too obsessed with an aesthetic in their head to see the world for what it actually is, and to accept that life is ephemeral.
>>152352023Why is it these comics always take place in a white western society and not one that looks like...well...this?Are the cartoonists, racists?
>>152352023wow that's a lotta wordstoo bad i don't listen to women
>>152354458Because you don't research anything then make assumptions of knowledge based on your lack of knowledge on the matter. This is a comic complaining that muslim women are becoming bad wives because feminismn.
>>152354587lol, good pic
>>152354587he didn't say feminists didn't exists in brown societies. the implication was that these feminists would never portray themselves a brown male society because then they would be racist
>>152355923 "portray themselves overthrowing a brown male society"it would be racist/islamophobic/colonialist etc, all the buzzwords
>>152354458Nah just scared.
>>152356025it's kinda pathethic to pretend to be a brave feminist in a white society. the only reason women got the right to vote in african, india and east asian societies is because whites have defined modernity, and they think to be modern they have to do what we do
>>152352376That's not true.
>>152356311theres writings by muslim travelers where they talk about how cucked the viking males where by their women, of course relative to muslim laws
>>152352147>I wonder what would happen if say some lesbian really checked out for lunch, you know like say, her brain just totally shit the bed one day, and she starts believing everything she sees on tv.Minnesota showed us. Wasn't pretty, no pun intended, and it turns out, men are still faster shots even when machines equalize the field.
>>152352023To be fair Valerie Solanas worked at the factory with Andy Warhol and Andy Warhol was a notorious tranny chaser so she was surrounded by transsexuals in the 60s
>>152356876Where the fuck does this comic mention trannies? Obsessed.
>In her 2004 book about masculinity, “The Will to Change,” bell hooks argued against ideas of men as the enemy and as universal beneficiaries of patriarchy, a false notion introduced by women with class privilege. “Women who have been raised in poor and working-class homes have always been acutely aware of the emotional pain of the men in their lives,” she wrote.
>>152356904The part about how all men want to women in the second panel
>>152356762>of course relative to muslim lawsNo shit, everybody treats women better compared to Muslims.Compared to other northern Europeans and even the Anglo Saxons they were about the same. Stories about "Shield Maidens" are overhyped.
>>152356904>Obsessed.Classic gaslighting tactic.
>>152352023As a man, I like punching men. Can be a feminist too?
>>152354587>>152354641Anon, if she refuses at work she gets fired, that's the whole point of the damn thing. And bosses like that are cunts. You should know, you've had one, I've had one, we've all had one. Boss can do his own fucking coffee while she handles the quarterly reports as per her job.
>>152352387Funny you say that. The woman who wrote it, Valerie Solanas, the chick that shot Andy Worhal, was severely abused as a child. It doesn't totally excuse her behavior as an adult, but man she needed therapy.
>>152357116when i talk about women having it better im not talking about epic reddit shield maidens, "women can do the same things as men" type bullshit. just general mobility, personhood and safety
>>152356876She wrote the SCUM manifesto before she met Andy.in fact she met because she trying to get it turned into a play and she found her amusing.
>>152356951Proper working class feminism. At the end of the day feminism, antiracism, whatever, if it's done right, is about making shit better for the average man, woman, etc. And those outside of the target group, because a rising tide lifts all ships and making shit nicer for your neighbours or the neighbourhood next to yours makes it nicer for you and yours too by proxy.Notice how some of the radfeminazi types are also terfs? That's why I never got on the all men are bastards bandwagon, or transphobia; if you think they're men, well, I'm a bloke and like fuck I'm putting up with my fellow man being bullied like that. If you hate FtMs because you think they're women, you're having a go at other women, or if male terfs are, they're being sexist.
>>152352080>it in the aftermath of a bad breakup.This is the origin point of radical feminism and homosexuality. Someone has a bad experience with the opposite sex and then decides to hate that sex forever.
>>152357288should rapists who are ftm be let into female prisons? they ARE women aren't they?
>>152357148Obsessed with gaslighting or whatever>>152357017That's the first panel and that's not what "pussy envy" means. It means it affects how men behave not that men all want to be trans or monogender is the way to go.>>152357319Have there been FTM rapists?Well if there have what we need to do is get them hopped up on super steroids and release them into open area mazes with strap ons attached to chase down all the men in prison. We will live stream it for profit like in a dystopian 80s movie and use it to lower taxes.
>>152357288>At the end of the day feminism, antiracism, whatever, if it's done right, is about making shit better for the average man, woman, etc. And those outside of the target group, because a rising tide lifts all ships and making shit nicer for your neighbours or the neighbourhood next to yours makes it nicer for you and yours too by proxy.You're clearly new here, so I'll be the one to inform you that on 4chan we judge ideologies and political movements by what they do, not by what they say they do, and progressive political movements have historically attacked inequalities not out of egalitarian idealism, but in order to replace those inequalities with new inequalities that benefit them. Feminists require a 50/50 gender split of men and women for C-suite executive positions, but not for construction, mining, and waste management. Anti-racists require that "visible minority races" - despite making up the majority of the population be given preferential treatment in all facets of life. Progressive ideology put into action is not a tide that lifts all ships, but a selective typhoon that sinks the ships that the progressives hate. We have seen this wherever Marxism has taken hold: The Progressives immediately use their newfound power to repress everyone they don't like.
To anyone confused by the op image, Valerie Solanas was in no way promoting equality of the sexes or transexuality, She promoting exterminating men.
>>152357563Dominating men, Solanas admits they can't completely exterminate them in her own book.
>Valerie Jean Solanas (April 9, 1936 – April 25, 1988) was an American radical feminist known for her attempt to murder the artist Andy Warhol in 1968.>By the late 1970s, Solanas had largely vanished from public view, with claims that she had become homeless,[94] and her whereabouts became uncertain. In October 1979, her mother filed a missing person report. Solanas—then living in Manhattan's Greenwich Village—was located two weeks later.[95]>Some accounts suggest Solanas had adopted a series of aliases and drifted around the country in the early 1980s while grappling with increasingly severe paranoid schizophrenia.[96]>On April 25, 1988, at the age of 52, Solanas died of pneumonia at the Bristol Hotel in San Francisco.[105] Her mother burned all her belongings posthumously.[13]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Solanas
>>152357428i meant mtf
>>152357610does she explain why men don't just keep women in cages at home?
>>152356951One of the biggest issues feminism faces is the fact that a lot of what is actually discussed in the academic space never seems to make it to the "pop" side of things.Here's a good one. "Male expendability/the violence object"Basically, if patriarchy posits women as the sex object. It posits man as the violence object. That is to say, a woman is always good because she is breeding stock, but a man's value is only as good as his assertion in a rigid line of his comparison to other men. His value is determined by dangerous jobs, assert himself upon other men, be willing to go to war, gain prowess/prestige and lay his claim for his right to the breeding stock. Patriarchal systems asserting that this is the value of any singular male. "Women and children first!" because a male life exists to protect the breeding stock and he must be willing to die for it because what is he without the breeding stock. This is why he is to never let himself be vulnerable and why he is to never allow himself the right to feel pain for only the strong have right to the breedingEven the overall idea of patriarchy wasn't that men took control from women but that, in unspoken historical deals between the two, our male and female ancestors alike made the agreement of "men the violence object and women the sex object".This is supposedly the theory on that "patriarchy hurts men" stuff you hear all the time. Yet, they never actually delve into the theory. You rarely see the context of the man as the "violence object" and part of the reason is that the common feminist doesn't wanna talk about a core issue that academic feminism agreed upon decades ago, that women were just as responsible for the system called "patriarchy" as men. The "violence object" was built on the notion of being something women agreed to since it implies men made sacrifice for the system. Because in the ancient yesteryears before security cameras and well lit streets, it was beneficial to them.
>>152357319I presume you mean mtf? Either way you don't put convicted rapists in with the general population. Wouldn't do that.>>152357472>new hereI've /b/een here since 2009.>judge by their actionsBut they aren't a single monolith as clearly shown by the example Anon gave that shows working class feminists do very much care for the men in their communities, you are assuming that everyone is just like that ones you hear about, the radical dickheads, and you are presuming they are all Marxist when there are plenty who aren't quite as far left as that. Those are fourth wave radfems who think all men are bastards. The third wave radfems who think all men are bastards hate trans people. You are quite like the very thing you hate. And you offer no citations.
>>152354199>The internet didn't exist when Solanas wrote the SCUM manifesto.I assumed it was just some webcomic.
>>152357722See, it's interesting you bring up rapists because that actually ties into this >>152357714The way we treat rapists from other forms of different violent criminals ties into the the discourse around "the violence object" concept. That is to say, other forms of violent criminals being treated as "more forgivable" in comparison ties into the notion because they were, in some regard, treated as simply fulfilling the role of the violence object in regards to eliminating their potential competition for the breeding stock, while the rapist is viewed as "defiling the purity" of said stock. It creates an artificial squeamishness around how we talk about rape, rape culture, et cetera. A rapist and a guy who beats a man to the point of needing to be in the ICU are shown to get the exact same power highs and the exact same trauma symptoms are reported in the victims, but since the expectation for males is violence and assertion, society almost views the latter as "less bad" rather than treating them more equivalently in terms of moral failure.
>>152357852One thing to highlight is that when I look at how a lot of us were "educated" on feminism and patriarchy back in the 2010s as teens or young adults, we weren't really taught how it works. They'd say something like "mansplaining", they'd say "patriarchy hurts men too", but then questions would be met with "it's not my job to educate you".And that's saying something because the academic concepts I've mentioned originate as far back as the 1960s and 1970s.The 2010s were plagued by this because it had become a cultural zeitgeist to be woke on the issue even if you hadn't actually studied it so a shit ton of young men ended up lectured on patriarchy or privilege without even actually being taught about jack shit since, I am going to be real, it feels like a lot of 2010s activists wanted to speak to those who already agreed or wag fingers at "the uneducated" rather than actually try to get anything productive done, and that created what we're seeing with Gen Z males now because they created a radical counterculture to the constant lecturing they received.
>>152357242I've met women and a guy who were sexual abused by their dads. Hell, I was sexually abused by my brother. It's not an excuse at all.
>>152357722ok, should mtf rapists be put among special populations in female prisons?
>>152357294Anecdotally, I disagree. Having repeated shitty romantic relationships didn't make me liberal or gay. It just made me not want to do anything but fuck hookers ever again.
>>152357242I genuinely think most women think like this and its a big reason why i feel a sick thrill whenever i hear about women getting abused in the news. I hate myself for it too deep down
>>152352023Have you ever read Man-eaters
>>152358312Pretty much every person I've ever meant who decided to "go gay" after a shitty ex typically kept an ever-growing list of "exceptions" in their back pocket and usually the ex is at the very top of the list.
the final goal is to rob women of motherhood and put them at the same level of disposableness as men you will have your equality
