[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is BFDI and most object shows considered "childish"? Adults on 4chan enjoy things made for younger audiences like Sonic, Mario, Pokemon, Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, Disney, Pixar, etc and no one calls them out. but when someone says they're a object show fan in this board, they're immediately suspected of being underage. Why is this? I don't get it.
>>
File: images (22).jpg (6 KB, 258x195)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
I watch it but just look at it, it doesn't have a Carl to make it mature
>>
>>153105812
>ATHF is mature because it has Carl
>>
>>153105798
It’s literally just for eyes with stick arms on them. Having characters personify and be named after common objects is a trope almost exclusively found in kids media, and the show has no unique artistic flare if I’m being completely honest
>>
>>153106305
Just eyes*
And when anons talk about children shows, it’s usually through nostalgia or finding the characters hot



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.