Anon, Dobson always had his variants>MovieBobDobson if he became a critic instead of an artist>PizzaCakeDobson if he was female>John F. FountainDobson if he made it into the animation industry>SkscartoonDobson if he was a right-winger>Thomas AstrucDobson if he was successful in life>Ben GarrisonDobson if he was born in the 1950’s and became a right winger later in his life>Obi ArisukwuDobson if he was black
>>155570724NoThat you even care about this most mediocre of white bitches makes you far more of a lolcow than she ever could be
>>155570724Not really
>>155570741>MovieBobWhat makes the similarities even funnier is that him and Dobson were born only a few days apart from eachother.
>>155570724Where is the porn of PizzaWolf?
>>155570724>good at drawingShe's so deluded. She doesn't know she's a low IQ hole
>>155570724literally her worst furry drawing
Desperate thirstbait wrapped up in an ununny furry confession.
>>155570741>>155570724The major difference between someone like PizzaCake and someone like Dobson is that at least Dobson has actual opinions. They might be shitty, often downright pathetic opinions, but at least he genuinely feels a certain way about things. PizzaCake has zero actual opinions, or if she has them she takes great care to never share them on the internet. Instead, she just takes the most generic, lukewarm version of whatever's currently a popular opinion on Reddit and then makes a lazy talking heads comic about it. Please give me more money on Patreon for yet another masterpiece.
>>155570916Wouldn't be surprised if she's already selling it on Patreon like the rest of her porn.
>>155570921OMG ANON YOU CAN'T JUST SAY THAT, DON'T YOU KNOW THAT SHE'LL MAKE YET ANOTHER CHEAP STRAWMAN COMIC ABOUT YOU?
>>155571028Anon you could not possibly be seething harder that someone is making their mediocrity pay offSeriously, this just doesn't work and it makes you kids look desperate. Dobson was a genuine social invalid that wrote about throwing bitch fits because he was around a celebration of hannukah and massive raging screeds against people telling him "you shouldn't color your art by using the fill bucket in MS Paint." PC is every white middle-aged middle-class woman's mildest takes in a boring but competent comic format.
>>155570724that's a really subpar furry
>>155571072>seethes while accusing others of seething, then just rephrases the post he's mad at and thinks he's making a pointBrava.Yes, Dobson's a genuine retard. That's the point. He's got shit takes because he's a shit person and he puts that energy into his shit comics. It's shit, but it's genuine shit.Meanwhile, PizzaCake is literally nothing but flavorless, recycled content from Reddit's front page. You'll never see a controversial take from her because she has no actual takes to begin with.My point being their both shit, but they've very different types of shit. She's not the "successor" to a lolcow like Dobson, which is what the OP is asking, because she'll never be anything but bland.
>>155571246Gee anon that's a lot of words to say "sorry, you're right"Seething over what you admit to be the absolute least controversial takes of all time is embarrassing. Stop doing it.
>>155571289This is just sad.
>>155571318Yes, that's what I said.
>>155570724Every artist on the internet in 2026 is Dobson’s successor. Except for ironically Dobson himself, who just keeps to himself these days and occasionally puts out short little animations.
>>155570724PizzaCake is VivziePop if she was political
>>155570724I've yet to see Pizzacake draw inflation.
>>155571465She doesn't know enough about politicsI'd say she's viv except she's older, middle class not creative and I've seen her cunt
I offer a counter to this threadQuirky millennial woman is the modern 2 gamers on a couch.She has not yet reached the heights of Buckley, however she mirrors early Buckley pre Loss and other insanity. Back when he angrily made comics about Jack Thompson.Will she be the modern buckley. Time will tell
>>155571496like that would stop her
I seen't it on the Internet
>>155571562If she gets a shit ton of threats why does she show the cunt? Is this some sort of repellent?
>>155571562>look at me, I'm so brave for taking the same political position literally every single person in the world does
>>155571663
>>155571562Genocide no, omnicide yes.
I guess this board isn't content with being just a /pol/ colony
>>155570741You forgot Blobby & Friends, Dobson if he was four troons/tumblrites.
>>155571815>DAMNIT! DOESN'T EVERYONE KNOW THIS BOARD IS FOR SHILLING GAY CARTOONS ONLY?!! NOW LETS TALK ABOUT THE TRANNY RABBIT AGAIN!!!!
>>155571871>TRANNY RABBITWho?
>>155571815Le this is le /pol/chan, le every board le here is le /pol/. Le isn't le that soooooooooooo le ebin?!??!!!
>>155571877jaxine
>>155571744>Everyone I dislike or disagree with is a Nazi>We should kill all Nazis>Woah, there sure are a lot of Nazis here getting upset, interestingWhen is this terminally online whore going to finally fuck off.Also, it's another Reddit raid doing their roastie queen's work.
>>155571923meanwhile, Palestine...
>>155571923>When is this terminally online whore going to finally fuck off.When you people stop giving her attention? It's that easy. These people will literally stop if no one falls for it.
>>155570900If we’re being real here MovieBob is the closest we have to another Dobson. Both are hardcore Nintendo fanboys, consoomers, far leftists, fat neckbeards, and support feminism, the only difference is that Dobson went on to improve on himself while Bob is still doing the same shit.
>>155571937but here you are.
>>155571562It would be funny if this was the first step towards her avatar joining Pepe as a “symbol of hate”.
>>155570724Dobson hasn't mattered in over a decade. You're old now and pretending the frivolities of your youth were some important internet touchstone when they were already on their way to oblivion.
>>155571979Yeah. Not talking about her. Responding to the guy. I know you thought you were being witty, but please stop trying, nigger.
>>155571092This. The mice that she drew were much better.
>>155572013that's it. keep bumping the thread that's about her.>its okay when I DO IT
>>155570741Another addition>Adam EllisDobson if he had a filterHis comics are the most unfunny millennial shit ever yet as far as I know he never sperged out as much as Dobson and his variants did. It’s hard to describe but there’s something about him that gives off the same Dobson/Pizzacake energy.
>>155572041You got raped, maybe even a little gaped.
>>155572062another bump. good job.she can use the help. good simp
>>155572062What the fuck? Why do you incels think it's okay to make fun of rape?
>>155571744She does know there aren't any Nazis anymore right?
>>155572121Anything right of Marx is a heckin' Naziarino, don't you know?
>>155571968>far leftistsThe internet of the past 5 years has skewed my impression of far left and far right, since there are so many actual extremists now. In comparison, Bob and Dob were like standard progressives.
>>155571562Didn’t there population increase.
>>155572210shhhhhh, she's huckin' for money
Kiwicunt retardation is the Internet equivalent of trash TV and jerry springer is universally regarded as the worst show on television for good reason.Make the "mods" and "jannies" do their fucking jobs.https://sys.4chan.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=155570724
>>155571562>cares more about the elimination of pedophile worshippers miles away from her than her own people being systematically replaced by said pedophile worshippers back homeWhy do we keep posting her shit here?
>>155572228>Now who wants to talk about the tranny rabbit again?????
>>155572249Buggs?
>>155571028He akready said "Dobson if he was female".
>>155572121>She does know there aren't any Nazis anymore right?Stop pulling the whole "they aren't technically part of the NSDAP party of Nazi Germany, that doesn't exist anymore!" Nobody normal thinks that's what she means. People commonly use Nazi to refer to Neo-Nazis and other people sympathetic to or ideologically aligned with Nazism.
>>155572259>>155563614have fun
>>155572286Most Neo-Nazis don't even subscribe to any of the economic policies of the regime.
Why are there two separate threads about her up right now?
>>155572305And? Both hate niggers. That's close enough.
>>155572305Even if that’s true, it doesn't change the point. Plus it's less about the economic policies for most people, and more about the shared commitment to racial supremacy and antisemitism.Someone who explicitly embraces Hitler and Nazi racial ideology can fairly be called a Nazi as shorthand, even if they disagree on economic policies.
>>155570724Is she a furry or not?
>>155570724Really no one else is like Dobson, he was some incredibly unusual mix of perpetually angry piece of shit asshole, and Twitter inspired wannabe savior that defended the downtrodden by being even more of a hate-filled angry asshole.He was like some kind of>What the fuck is wrong with you?terrible uninformed opinion making machine that churned out the stupidest takes ever. Moviebob is probably thew closest to him in grown creepy dork that is so anger-filled that it takes over his every comment.
>>155571028Dobsons opinions consist of >Why are things different from when I was a kid?!?!and>Why isn't everyone fully adhering to the laws of Twitter based self loathing, saviorism as meeeeeee?!?!!?!?Basically your garden variety autistic person who has experienced too much Tumblr and Twitter only it became a past time to see him outrage at meaningless things for no actual reason.
>>155571246>seethes while accusing others of seething, then just rephrases the post he's mad at and thinks he's making a pointWeirdly, this statement encapsulates Dobson's entire online persona
>>155572341American education. The NSDAP never had any issues with niggers, since they weren't a factor in Europe until recently.
>>155572474>Negermusik and all the anti-negro posters NEVER existed, NSDAP loved niggers, actually.Kill yourself faggot.
>>155572474Sure. That's why they sterilized them, right?
>>155570724I AM SEETHING ABOUT THIS SUCCESFUL AND HAPPY CARTOONIST
She should help out lonely right-wing boys by offering them that pinko pussy instead of drawing retarded comics.
>>155571744>"WHEN THERE'S NONE LEFT">meanwhile in the Middle East...
>>155572535She doesn’t seem very happy or successful.>>155572573When was this said? Hitler was a vegan that loved Disney
>>155572597Then are Disney adult leftists literally Hitler?
>>155572556>offeringThey should take it by force much like their homeland
>>155570724fuck shes cute
>>155572556That’s all they really have to offer huh? And we fall for it every time…>>155572640No, we need to avoid that STD ridden stank as much as possible. You know she practices “polyamory” behind the scenes
>>155572614Everyone is literally Hitler, the left want a tyrannical government and censorship and the right want to protect their people and play video games
>>155572597>Hitler was a veganHitler had health issues as a legacy of being gassed, digesting meat was painful for him. That's not the same as vegan.
>>155572395>Someone who explicitly embraces Hitler and Nazi racial ideology can fairly be called a NaziSo we can call Muslims Nazis?
>>155572740Hitler was vegan, but he did some good stuff too
>>155572754Yes.
Three threads and all of them are talking about the dying white race and Hitler
>>155572656Shill opinion
>>155572656not in real life
>>155572286like Palestine? They keep flying those swastikas.
>>155570724I SEEN'D IT.I SEEN HER COOKIE ON THE INTERNET!
>>155572286>stop using actual definitionsDidn't you leftists try this with gender too
>good at rawing furries>good thats fucking ass and she does this shit for a job.Well and showing me Ive seen it
>>155573022>>good at rawing furries>rawingLike, getting fucked by?
>>155572503Are we talking about Nazi Germany, or Israel?
>>155573002>pretending to not understandThis quote doesn't just apply to leftists.
>>155570724SB99 needs to draw her eating a giant bucket of poutine and these threads would actually make a difference.
Lol redhats getting BTFO in the midterms
>>155572121She's probably talking about guys like elongated muskrat:https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1i7a3m0/lets_not_jump_to_conclusions/
>>155572107>Why do you incels think it's okay to make fun of rape?>Muh rape jokesConsidering foids literally make up 80% of the literature market, and it's all mainly rape romantasy they're finger fucking themselves to.Then they're basically complicit in child murderer cultists at this point with Pro-Choice and being extremely pro-Lindsay Clancy. So they're anything BUT these paragons of helpless little angels with a broken wing that white knights need to simp over.
>doesn't this BITCH understand that there are no more Nazis?>also Hitler was right btw
>>155572121If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.
>UR CUNT >I SEEN'T IT>ON THE INTERNET
>>155574045They can never really hide their true nature
>>155573419Ironic how you all are raiding boards as the elections are starting to ramp up. Using a Reddit roastie who spreads her cunt online with children as the vessel of a Trojan discussion to talk about the upcoming elections, and somehow this is the gotcha moment.
>>155570724hol up pizza cake had a furry phase?
>>155574075I don't think these r/comics 4chan threads have anything to do with the failure of your party and your worldview
>>155572754No, because nazis didn’t worship a pedophile.
>>155570724The last panel looks like Bedfellows
>>155570724
>>155574045>>155574063Why did you reply to yourself, bootlicker?
>>155574122>Bait>I don't think these r/comics 4chan threads have anything to do with the failure of your party and your worldview>your party and your worldview>ImplyingIronic that leftoids fucked the entire entertainment industry and won the culture war in that regard, and they only can create slop, and post slop. Despite having their entire hands on he creative mechanisms of creative media.Then Disney freaking out because they gutted their male audiences and foids aren't picking up the bill enough.And somehow this is the right's fault.Or let's go further to education running off men and tipping the scales for foids in colleges and now colleges are freaking out because they made such a blatantly anti-male space.Kek. Keep spamming fucktard. The right is basically inert, while the left fucking shit everything up since Obama and Affirmative Action that led to DEI, which is a violation of the Civil Rights Act.
>>155574213>blah blah blah blah blah I'm mad because straight white men aren't exclusively catered to at everyone else's expense because I can only win if the deck is grossly stacked in my favor, blah blah blah blah blah
>>155574269>I'm a raiding and baiting giga-faggotFixed it for ya'.
>>155574213That's a whole lot of words that can be completely blown out of the water with a single phrase: 7 dollar diesel
>>155574296Didn't read, cope and seethe. Maybe Daddy Trump will love you if you gargle his rancid balls some more.
>>155571835Blobby is peak comedy
>>155574213>Leftists won the culture war in hollywood!Anon there was no culture war in Hollywood. There never were any considerable right-wing creatives even when people had to hide that they were gay. The entire industry sprang in the first place out of marginalized groups in the west not being allowed to do most available jobs. Hollywood was gay and jewish from the word go and will never not be.Media sucks because of corporate consolidation, a result of right-wing policies and the gutting of antitrust enforcement bodies.
>>155570724Slut
>>155574314Trump 2028!!!
>>155574045He was right about benefits of drinking water.
>>155574352Creativity is inherently liberal because it requires thinking outside the box and embracing new ideas, while conservatives value rote memorization and sticking to what they already know. The left wants to create, the right just wants to destroy everything they can't control.
>>155571092Wolf furries are that
>>155574313>>155574314>>155574352Kek, is that why Comicsgate and the late 2010s gutted all the right leaning creators out with purity spirals in their industry, HR created blackbooks on who to keep out, and then started lambasting:>Only left leaning people are creativesAs a low hanging fruit gotcha. Kek, and since then, it's all been ugly hyper representative media constantly instead of keeping authentic to source materials.Is that why too, that creators went behind the backs of upper management in Rings of Power (to which fucking Jeff Bezos was furious, because he dumped so much into that project to have a wokie retelling of LOTR, because it wasn't gay and diverse enough) and the Witcher and ruined that with virtue signal and sunk those two projects? Or rewriting and redubbing anime scripts to push political agendas? And even then, making the excuse that you need to be the right race to be a voice actor, and basically DEI is nothing more than a way of securing employment through abusing a high trust societies empathy and then hiding behind "not enough x, y, z in the industry parody".There's so much evidence of lefty fuckery it's not even funny.
>>155570724there's 4 active pizzacake threads right now. the fuck happened?
>>155574296Based Space King enjoyers bullying the gay leftist
>>155574458Because 4chan is being raided by PizzaCunt simps, Redditors and because of the elections.
>>155574457You're right, DEI is certainly a problem.
>>155574484Jason Ardy is a perfect example you mega faggot, and the can of worms that would open. And it's illegal based on the Civil Rights Act.
>>155574458a couple schizos from /pol/ had a melty after their first pizzacake thread of the day got deleted so they spammed the board with 4 more
>>155574458Wrong, there's actually 6 active threads right now.>>155574478It's probably not a raid. It's likely native users who are trolling this site because a lot of users on here flip out over her comics.
>>155570724Dobson grew up and made good animations
>>155574509>Jason Ardy he's from britain. not the usa. they don't have the same civil rights act as the usa
>>155574513I remember when this happened to stonetoss threads way back in 2016
>>155574539And people failing upwards because of DEI has been a trend in the US too retardo. Again, illegal based on the Civil Rights Act.
>>155574509https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dei>diversity, equity and inclusion: the idea that all people should have equal rights and treatment and be welcomed and included, so that they do not experience any disadvantage because of belonging to a particular group, and that each person should be given the same opportunities as others according to their needshttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/civil-rights>the rights that each person has in a society, whatever their race, sex, or religion>but somehow DEI goes against the Civil Rights Act
>>155574570>Being intellectually disingenuous about how DEI is employed vs the textbook definition as a gotcha
>>155574620Oh right, I forgot that you see life as a zero-sum game so you equate everyone having the same rights and opportunities as straight white men to outright genocide of straight white men in the streets, and you're also a malignant narcissist so you can't feel like the king of the playground unless you force all of the other kids to beg and grovel at your feet. Silly me, an honest mistake.
>>155574553could you be specific about what dei thing is violating the civil rights act?
>>155574620how is it employed? Are you just using the term to describe something completely different?
>>155574674>>155574694>>155574706>Goal post moving>No DEI doesn't exist or is employed at all by pulling others back, and pushing others forward as a means to create representative parody in all fields>Actually DEI is a good thing, even though it violates the Civil Rights Act, and is basically a means to game the system by using your identity as a guaranteed employment buttonI swear you people are born from snakes.
>>155570724>5 threads about this bitch in the catalog
>>155574694>>155574706He can't explain without revealing what he's really mad about and losing the argument, which is why he won't explain.
>>155574732>even though it violates the Civil Rights ActYou still haven't explained how it does that, and I know why you're not going to explain. You've already lost this one.
>>155574732They’re marxist, they can only lie. And when that fails they just play dumb.
>>155574775I just want him to answer a simple question and he keeps weaseling out of it. So who's really lying and playing dumb?
how do you think she explains the porn to people irl?
>>155574744>>155574760>>155574792>"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing">Literally spells it out in the post by creating representative parody in all fields through work quotas based on the number of each worker's identities, and then pulling and pushing forward new candidates back and forth, tipping the scales
>>155574792He did, and you’re ignoring it because you can’t argue it. As usual you’re acting like a toddler because you lost an internet argument.
>>155574806Answer the question: how does DEI violate the Civil Rights Act? If you refuse to answer this time, I'm just going to assume that you don't actually have an answer and you're full of shit.
>>155571028Pizzacake is the anthromorphic personification of reddit itself. Her opinions are the consensus reddit opinions and her irl behaviors are an amalgamation of every reddit quirk chungus female reddit user combined.
>>155570724I think OP would be Dobson's successor with the way he obsesses over spamming this lolcow drama garbage and not so stealthy culture war politics baiting. Make a Xitter account and start sharing your hot takes on everything OP. Fame and fortune are within your grasp. (You) could be raking in millions of views and engagement on X, the Everything App, by just being your retarded self.
>>155574433This man has never heard of satire and would unironically fedorapost if he were using the internet back in 2009 just because Dawkins is smart and he wants to be smart too.
>>155574834BTA but, hiring people based on the color of their skin is a violation of human rights for those that aren't of that race, you stupid fuck
>>155574809>how does DEI violate the Civil Rights Act?>Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin>Proceeds to discriminate against candidates for employment and promotion based on chasing after representative parody in employment>>****"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing"****
>>155574834He already answered it, you’re ignoring it because you have no counter to what he said. It’s all the more obvious because your creating an out for yourself where you act smug and run away pretending you didn’t play dumb for five posts.
>>155574870 Meant for >>155574834
>>155574868>hiring people based on the color of their skin is a violation of human rights for those that aren't of that raceYes, that's what DEI is supposed to remedy. But I still don't understand how it violates the Civil Rights Act, and at this point I have to draw the conclusion that it doesn't, which means you're all full of shit, and I win this argument. I've been proven right five times so far tonight, wanna make it six?
>>155574870>>155574889You are just claiming DEI discriminates against candidates. You need to provide evidence that it does so.
>>155574907>Bait and playing stupid
>>155574870>if the game isn't rigged for straight white men, it's rigged against themDO I HEAR SEVEN?
>>155574907>that's what DEI is supposed to remedy>supposed toVery subtle concession, both on the point at-hand and admittance that DEI sucks at its purpose.
>>155574920>if the game isn't rigged for straight white menLet me stop you right there, faggot. Who ever argued that it should be? Did anyone in this thread say it should be?
>>155574912>DEI is just a definition, it doesn't exist>It actually exists and it's good>Where is the evidence of DEI exisiting>****"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing"****>Baiting and intellectually disingenuous
>>155574918Merely claiming something is true is not an explanation. He's also probably wants you to explain what you think DEI is, since you've said the textbook definition isn't the real thing:>>155574620
>>155574930you are playing word games, he didn't concede either of those points
>>155574952how is it a word game?
>>155574941>>DEI is just a definition, it doesn't existNo one here said that.
>>155570724Never forget Dobson wonhttps://youtu.be/OIJqzakvCYc
>>155574940>Who ever argued that it should be?That's what you want, isn't it? For straight white men to always be on top and always be in the spotlight, and never have to see women, gay people or minorities as an actual threat to their throne, just uppity nuisances that need to be kept in their place? That's what all of your hatred of DEI and civil rights and equality and woke and blah blah blah boils down to. You don't want anyone except people like you to be in the spotlight. I'm gonna go ahead and call this one #8 right now. Keep going, I wanna hit the big 1-0 tonight, I'm on a roll.
>>155574972 ---> >>155574570>****"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing"****
>>155574969It’s not, he’s just repeating what the other guy said to him because he’s seething about it.
>>155574969Saying that "x is supposed to do y" is not a concession that "x has not accomplished y".
>>155574976nigger you're arguing with a strawman in your head
>>155574980He didn't say DEI doesn't exist. He just posted the link to a dictionary definition of the term.
>>155574976>White men are the sacrificial totems on the scale of representative parody, and that's a good thing, because we still pretend the patriarchy and Jim Crow exists in modernityThanks for confirming it, retard.
>>155574952>Word gamesYou mean "reading the damn text?" "Supposed to" means that he's describing the intent of something. The intent does not need specified if the function is self-evident.If you have a car that explodes when you turn the key and someone says "the car's supposed to start!" A reasonable person would infer, from this, that the car wasn't supposed to explode, implicitly confirming something went wrong.It's the same deal here. It's "supposed" to solve Civil Rights discriminations, but doesn't.And before you or he starts trying to backpedal on that, you/he are trying everything to enforce a confirmation bias argument, so fuck off.
>>155574986>>155574983He admitted it's done to remedy a past wrong, you disingenuous ass
>>155574997>****"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing"****
>>155574976>That's what you want, isn't it?That's really what you get from "stop discriminating against us?"Please take your medication, stop using Reddit, step outside, and touch grass.
>>155575005You said that, while admitting it’s a remedy but not how it’s fair or isn’t discriminatory.
>>155574998>if white men aren't having their white asses constantly kissed that means everyone hates them and wants them goneVICTORY NUMBER NINE! GIVE IT UP FOR VICTORY NUMBER NINE!
>>155575041>Not discriminating against white men is kissing white assThanks for outing yourself.
>>155575016You are an utter fucking retard.All he did in that post was link the definition of a term.He didn't say it doesn't exist. He didn't say it's just a definition. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/loanhttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/automobileDoes posting these 2 links imply I am saying they are only definitions and do not exist?
>>155575032so you think it's fair and okay to hire people based on race and perceived past wrongs?
>>155575027>stop discriminating against us>but let us discriminate against everyone elseAnd that's number ten! Great thread everyone, thank you for all of the easy wins.
>>155574976>For transsexuals to always be on top and always be in the spotlight, and never have to see women, white people or minorities as an actual threat to their throne, just uppity nuisances that need to be kept in their place? That's what all of your hatred of whites and equality and fascism and blah blah blah boils down to. You don't want anyone except people like you to be in the spotlight. I'm gonna go ahead and call this one #8 right now. Keep going, I wanna hit the big 1-0 tonight, I'm on a roll.
>>155575005>He admitted it's done to remedy a past wrong, you disingenuous assThat doesn't mean it fails at accomplishing that goal
>>155575041Imagine getting btfo so hard by someone explaining that an initiative that which prioritizes hiring based on race and gender is discriminatory that you have to spend the rest of the thread playing dumb and pretending you one. Just as expected by the pizzacocksuckers
>>155575062>>but let us discriminate against everyone elseQuote a single person here who said this you schizophrenic troon.
>>155575058>Post literally implying directly DEI is "just" a definition>Proceeds to say DEI discrimination is real as a policy and it's a good thing>Playing stupid>Getting lost in the weeds
>>155575075so you admit you believe it should be implemented to reach a perceived goal
>>155575076>an initiative that which prioritizes hiring based on race and genderSource for that being what DEI is?
>>155575076At this point I don't think he's "playing." I think he's genuinely retarded.
>>155575059You’re deflecting, nothing I said in my last reply could be construed as that. You have to do this because you have no counter and can’t explain how it’s both discriminatory.
>>155575080https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/automobileDoes posting this link imply I am saying these are only definitions and do not exist?
>>155575102>Playing stupid>Getting lost in the weeds
>>155575080>>Post literally implying directly DEI is "just" a definitionHow does it imply that?
>>155575097I already explained how it's discriminatory and you or him admitted it was done to right past wrongs
>>155575091>Source for that being what DEI isYou’ve already been given a source and you need to ignore it because you have nothing else>>155575092He is yes, but at the moment he’s just playing dumb because his retarded ideology/agenda has been ripped apart.
>>155575089I have no real opinion on it, because no one here has explained what the process would even involve or if it has ever been implemented.
>>155575128>You’ve already been given a source and you need to ignore it because you have nothing elseBy source, are you referring to this post: >>155574570
>>155575118I didn’t admit that, I was calling him out for doing that. You’re either confused or you’re larping as the guy who blew you the fuck out and caused this temper tantrum to try and poison the well.
>>155574974Its so funny dobson became a relaxed animator
>>155575129do you live under a rock or are you fucking retarded?Do you think DEI magically appeared out of think air, nigga it's in government documents you stupid fuckhttps://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01753/advancing-racial-equity-and-support-for-underserved-communities-through-the-federal-government
>>155575114It's a really simple yes or no question. You can even answer with something like "I'm not sure" if you want.https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/automobileDoes posting this link imply I am saying these are only definitions and do not exist?
>>155575136No, but once again you need to ignore everything that proves you wrong.
>>155575141If this is you then you did admit it >>155574907
>>155575152>Already explained it>"Explain it anon, I ONLY posted the definition to get the conversation lost in the weeds of semantics">Playing stupid
>>155575152This fag actually trying pilpul-style wordplay while getting ninja'd by anon getting straight to the point: >>155575148.
>>155575157It’s not me
>>155575156Which of these posts had the source you are referring to?>>155572228>>155573813 >>155574570>>155574974>>155575058>>155575102There's not many many posts with links in the thread, and we're only looking at posts before you made this post (>155575128).
>>155575180NTA but >>155575148
>>155575180Ah yes, the tactic of attempting to narrow things down arbitrarily to force your opponent into a box in order to play how you want them too. Very slimy, very in character. Now I want you to explain how it’s not discriminatory.
>>155575148Thread got a lot slower after this was posted
>>155574457>comicsgatelmao stopped reading there
>>155575161>>Already explained it>>"Explain it anon, I ONLY posted the definition to get the conversation lost in the weeds of semantics">>Playing stupidOk, you don't like that he posted the dictionary definition of the term DEI, because you view it as word play or whatever.That's entirely different from your claim that that posting that dictionary definition of a thing is equivalent to implying that a thing does not exist and that it is only a definition.
>>155575192That post was made AFTER he claimed the source was PREVIOUSLY posted: >>155575128>You’ve already been given a source and you need to ignore it because you have nothing else
>>155575206No shit, I mean it is just one guy doing damage control for DEI shit while aggressively samefagging. Probably went to cry to one of his janny buddies to have the thread nuked. Furiously pinging him on shitcord.
>>155575212>r/comics fan
>>155575200>Ah yes, the tactic of attempting to narrow things down arbitrarily to force your opponent into a box in order to play how you want them too. Very slimy, very in character. All you have to do is tell me which of these posts had your source. Or you can say that you were mistaken and that a source hadn't been posted yet at that time. I'm not forcing you into a box.>Now I want you to explain how it’s not discriminatory.Commenting on that would require you to provide your source.
>>155575225no, it's at least 2 people.
>>155575225>discord raider projects: the post
>>155575267>All you have to do is tell meYou mean repeat information that you already know and are pretending to be ignorant of despite showing in your last reply that you are in fact keeping track of posts in the thread? That’s the thing with you you fag. You play dumb and then show you’re playing dumb in the most retarded gambit possible.>Commenting on that would require you to provide your sourceIt wouldn’t, it would require you to give a counter to what has been said by multiple people at this point. But you can’t do that since you’re wrong and know that and so have to play dumb. Seriously you’re saying you need a source to give a counter argument.
>>155570741what about the religious dobson
>>155575277Nah, it’s one retard, you can tell by how he acts and that shit has ground to a halt now. If you’re worried about post timers that can be bypassed by dualfagging.>>155575281>no uLet’s add tu quoque to the list now as well.
>>155575304>he's a debate kidoof
>>155575128>You’ve already been given a source and you need to ignore it because you have nothing else>>155575287Let's make it easier for you. I'll quote post the links in each of those posts along with the post numbers. So, which of these links was your source for the definition of DEI:>>155572228>https://sys.4chan.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=155570724>>155573813>She's probably talking about guys like elongated muskrat:>https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1i7a3m0/lets_not_jump_to_conclusions/>>155574570>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dei>>diversity, equity and inclusion: the idea that all people should have equal rights and treatment and be welcomed and included, so that they do not experience any disadvantage because of belonging to a particular group, and that each person should be given the same opportunities as others according to their needs>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/civil-rights>>the rights that each person has in a society, whatever their race, sex, or religion>>but somehow DEI goes against the Civil Rights Act>>155574974>https://youtu.be/OIJqzakvCYc>>155575058>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/loan>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/automobile>>155575102>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/automobileYou can say that you were mistaken and that your source hadn't been posted yet at that time. You can also say you aren't sure or that you forgot.
>>155575312Being so mindbroken from being incapable of defending your point you have to try and mock people for being capable of it. No wonder you always fail.
>>155575304no its at least 2 people, because there's a bunch of posts that I didnt make
>>155575331>>155575339>goes back to the list of posts he is designating as having a source>while continuing to ignore everything that will show he’s a retardThis is the final form of every marxist retard, desperately going in circles and playing dumb.> no its at least 2 people, because there's a bunch of posts that I didn’t makeAccording to you the dishonest retard has been playing dumb the entire thread.
>>155575373Those are all the posts that had links in them before you made this post>>155575128So did you post the name of a source in this thread without linking it before that point?
>>155575331The schism with this pivot is that you're trying to change the argument entirely from "DEI does/doesn't exists and is/isn't ethical" to "Anon didn't post a definition!" Given that the definition exists outside of anon, as demonstrated by the anon that posted government recognition of the term, that's a moot point, albeit bad form on >>155575373's part.
>>155575473>Those are all the posts that had links in them before you made this postWhich irrelevant to you ignoring the post with the source. But thank you for confirming that you’re hyper fixating on them for that reason.>>155575485Bad form? He’s ignoring everything that contradicts him. Why is calling that out bad form?
>>155575148>https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01753/advancing-racial-equity-and-support-for-underserved-communities-through-the-federal-governmentNothing in there say you need to hire people on the basis of race.
>>155575588So then you should have no issue with this document the left were crying about if there is no racial baishttps://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/29/2025-01953/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing
>>155575148>>155575588>Playing semanticsThe government also acknowledges it is discrimination AND that it directly violates the Civil Rights Act.>What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work>https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work>Disparate Treatment>Hiring, promotion, compensation, exclusion from training, ~~ demotion, ~~ selection for interviews (including placement on candidate slates)
>>155575619 no racial bias in what?
>>155575649wow you're either disingenuous or unable to follow a simple chain of comments
>tries to pretend not to understand what DEI is and cry how it’s not discriminatory >gets btfo>plays dumb>that fails as well>starts spamming the catalog with pizzacuck threads to copeKWAB
>>155575563>Why is calling that out bad form?Because a definition should have been given at some point regardless. Arguments like this are for the third party, not the opponent.>>155575588>Nothing in there say you need to hire people on the basis of race>>155575619>if there is no racial bais>>155575649>no racial bias in what?Sidenote, but this is a hilarious bit of selective memory. Bro, do you even have a memory span longer than 5 minutes? How do you forget a point you just brought up?
>>155570724Why are people spamming this person’s comics
>>155575626>The government also acknowledges it is discrimination AND that it directly violates the Civil Rights Act.That's not an admission, because it's not coming from a government that supports DEI. It's coming from Trump's admin who is against DEI.That page was only created during Trump's administration.https://web.archive.org/web/20250319222216/https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work
>>155575703>It's coming from Trump's admin who is against DEI.Think very carefully about what you just said.
>>155575703>>155575713Oh shit he really did slip up againAlso "I'll only accept proof/evidence from people who support my side" is hilarious
>>155575701>Because a definition should have been given at some point regardless.A definition was given, you ignored it and played dumb just like with everything else that proved you wrong. >>155575702The guy who is crying about DEI not being discriminatory is because he was btfo.
>>155575619>>155575701Trump's executive order you posted revokes Biden's and accuses it of being discriminatory. If one believes Biden's Executive Order 13985 is not discriminatory and works to fight discrimination: Why would that mean one should NOT have an issue with Trump's executive order ? > Section 1 . Purpose and Policy. The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI), into virtually all aspects of the Federal Government, in areas ranging from airline safety to the military. This was a concerted effort stemming from President Biden's first day in office, when he issued Executive Order 13985, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.”
>>155570724It's crazy how you can distinctly tell the difference between an animal character being drawn for a normal cartoon and one being drawn to appeal to furfags
>>155575713>>155575734>Also "I'll only accept proof/evidence from people who support my side" is hilariousNo. The point is that he was mischaracterizing his source.>>155575626>The government also acknowledges it is discrimination AND that it directly violates the Civil Rights Act.>>What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work>https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work
>>155570741>>155570724Dobson has no successorsthese people may have dobsonoid aspects to their personalities, but I don't think there will never be another dobson, not for a long time anywayNot one of them is as maladjusted as he wasNot one of them is as sensitive as he wasNot one of them has so many shitty opinions as he didNone one of them will be so universally mocked and despised as he wasLike I know of this one guy, Chaz is his name, has a tickle/foot fetish webcomic about lesbian witches, he's very 'woke' person, and physically, he looks like a wojak, or daniel kibblesmith.me and some friends joke about him being dobson if he was a ticklefag instead of an inflationfag, but in spite of that he's happily married, and all things considered, seems quite content with his life.Dobson was a uniquely miserable, mediocre, and annoying person that so far I've never seen anyone match
>>155574570Yes I think literally giving people blatant free jobs based on their race is very unethical.
>>155574834Favoring a person is blatant racism, if 50 white guys got their jobs because they were whites that still would break the constitution, and no just because that happened doesn't mean it is your turn to do it, at that point you just don't care about injustice and you just care about club sealing back.
>>155575838guy/manlyburger is an untapped sperg resource but that level of mental illness is too real for /co/
>>155575747>Why would that mean one should NOT have an issue with Trump's executive order ?Because your judgement are wrong.Your hypothetical is predicated on assuming Biden's order being fair, which is also what you're setting out to prove. That's unfounded, especially given that only a few posts ago you were arguing that nobody gave a definition fo what DEI is and only reluctantly conceded it was a thing after your piss-poor confirmation bias attempt in >>155575703 accidentally admitted it.
>>155575828>No. The point is that he was mischaracterizing his source.Your grounds for dismissing it were literally "it's against DEI." Come on now.
>>155575952The point is that it's an accusation. Not an admission.
>>155575992>Getting lost in the weeds>Semantics and word gamesIt's obvious DEI is a concept that goes past the confines of it's definition, it's been implemented, and that it is discriminatory within the eyes of the law.
>>155575992Anon, you cannot be "against" something unless that same concept is defined, or at least understood in SOME shared capacity. With this motte-and-bailey you're a solid decade too late to be feigning ignorance.Also, trying to dismiss something because it's "against DEI" implies that you would accept, or at least humor evidence, that's for it... so...
>>155575626>The government also acknowledges it is discrimination AND that it directly violates the Civil Rights Act.>>What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work>>https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work>>155575703>That's not an admission>>155575828>No. The point is that he was mischaracterizing his source.Anyways, with the point made that it's not an admission, that link doesn't actually say much about DEI. It's barely even an accusation. There's loaded sentences and paragraphs, which vaguely imply the DEI *might( be discriminatory. It doesn't even state that DEI is inherently discriminatory, or that is usually is discriminatory.This is the most it tells you about what DEI is:>Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) is a broad term that is not defined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII).
>>155576038>Anon, you cannot be "against" something unless that same concept is defined, or at least understood in SOME shared capacity. With this motte-and-bailey you're a solid decade too late to be feigning ignorance.There is no shared definition presented. Even in this thread you have someone posting the dictionary definition of DEI >>155574570 and the next poster immediately saying that doing so is intellectually dishonest >>155574620 and that it's not how it actually works.>Also, trying to dismiss something because it's "against DEI" implies that you would accept, or at least humor evidence, that's for it... so...That's not dismissing it. It's dismissing a specific claim about the source, that it is an acknowledgement of "guilt" rather than an accusation of "guilt".
>>155576086>Getting lost in the weeds>Semantics and word games>which vaguely imply the DEI *might( be discriminatory.>that link doesn't actually say much about DEI. It's barely even an accusation.>Link openly admits DEI discrimination occurs, how to file for it, and that there will be an investigation and the outlines of what DEI is and where it occurs in the various parts of employment as a form of employment discrimination>Straight up deflection and damage control
>>155576128>Dismissed obvious government cited sources>Well it doesn't EXPLICITLY define DEI>Literally outlines DEI, and the effects in the workforce and employment that it has>"I'm not dismissing anything" it doesn't exactly say what DEI isYou must be a DEI hire to be this in denial.
>>155575745>A definition was given, you ignored it and played dumb just like with everything else that proved you wrong.Was he ignoring this cambridge dictionary one here: >>155574570
>>155576128>There is no shared definition presentedEvidently there is because you, in your own wording, outright said the Trump administration is against it!Honest question, no bullshit please: Do you unironically think you're the smartest person in this thread and hence think you're able to get away with such flagrantly blatant backpedalling?>That's not dismissing it. It's dismissing a specific claim about the sourceYou literally just attacked the source dude:>because it's not coming from a government that supports DEI. It's coming from Trump's admin who is against DEI.Enough bullshitting.
>>155576188Screaming "but muh exact cambridge definition!" and not being able to move past what everyone else has posted is your only argument.
>>155575698the people that spammed pizzacuck threads literally admitted to doing it because they're mad they got btfo by images
>>155576139Suppose you are hired as a cashier, and you say the previous person who worked as a cashier before you was stealing money from the cash register. Regardless of whether it is true or false, that statement about the previous cashier is an accusation, It is not an admission.
>>155576188>Was heYou, it’s just you, you’re not fooling anyone. You already went fucking mental and started spamming the board you pathetic subhuman.
>>155576218wait so what definition was was posted that he had ignored?
>>155576232t. schizotroon
>>155576194What have I backpedaled?
>>155576249It was these guys spamming the board >>155572716He's been doing it for 10 hours
>>155576251The one linking to government websites you mongoloid...Along with all the others YOU had to scroll past on Google that defined it as a "framework" in order to cherrypick one that was defensible for you.I see what you did, faggot.
>>155576242I'm not answering your fucking retarded nonsensical scenario that makes no sense other than to muddy the waters in word play and semantics. ALSO:>The EEOC does not require a higher showing of proof for so-called “reverse” discrimination claims.
>>155576274>The one linking to government websites you mongoloid...Those were posted after this post, not before: >>155575128>You’ve already been given a source and you need to ignore it because you have nothing else
>>155576258Are you a chatbot? You argue like a chatbot with a poor context window.
>>155576265>the pizzacake schizo is LITERALLY a migger that's butthurt at reddit comicsto nobody's surprise
>>155576279>>The EEOC does not require a higher showing of proof for so-called “reverse” discrimination claims.What's your point here? Why would it be assumed to need a higher burden of proof? And how is that related to the previous post?
>>155576282>Those were posted after this postWell, they're given now, so >>155576218 and >>155575485 are uncontested. Answer them with arguments instead of begging the question, faggot.
>>155574834I'm not any of those other anons. I just think all niggers and women should die. Also I bet you're jewish.
>>155570741>Aleks SyntekDobson if he was a Mexican pop singer.
>>155576286You are utterly incapable of answering even the simplest of yes or no questions.
>>155576300>****"I play stupid, and intellectually disingenuous word games making discourse impossible, making getting lost in the weeds all the easier when I start losing"****You are a bot or someone desperate to try and die on the hill of defending DEI because they themself, are a DEI hire who knows they're an inferior candidate who scrapped by with policy.
>>155576306That's not what begging the question is.
>>155576286I think it's becoming obviously clear they are probably chatbot or some form of automated response system, because it goes in weird circular logic loops over and over again.
>>155576320You're getting pissy that I didn't take seriously your non sequitur question that didn't address anything I said.There's a certain entitlement to the way you fags argue that make me want to forcibly lock you all in a night school until you actually do finish English class.
a little ironic that even without the schizotroon spamming the thread, the chuds are still getting raped and gaped
>>155576330How is it some kind of Anti-DEI thing to say>The EEOC does not require a higher showing of proof for so-called “reverse” discrimination claims.
>>155576332That's not a counterargument to anything being said.
>>155576372>t. schizotroon, banned on the devices that had all of his pics saved
>>155576194>Evidently there is because you, in your own wording, outright said the Trump administration is against it!So, what's the relevance of that to having a shared definition? >You literally just attacked the source dude:That's a criticism of how he characterized the source. There is a difference between an accusation and a confession. An accusation can be true and a confession can be false, but they are still different things
>>155576408the name schizotroon sends a shiver of fear down your spine....
>>155576265You saying that after you get called out is pretty gay. Especially since the threads started getting spammed after your ass left and the thread slowed down.
>>155576365you dont know what a non sequitur is.
>>155576440Obsessed and MindbrokeGaped and Raped
>>155576232You said that after people started pointing out that you were spamming and throwing a tantrum to cover your ass.
>>155576412>So, what's the relevance of that to having a shared definition?Because it's YOUR words. YOU defined them as anti-DEI. YOU identified the concept, and from that the division in views on the concept, and judged where the Trump admin falls on that distinction.You really are using selective ignorance here because it's not difficult. You can't go from "X is undefined" to "Y = !X".>That's a criticism of how he characterized the source.No it wasn't. It was just dismissing it because of the administration's stance on it. You're backpedalling here.
>>155576478Right so you are posting from two devices like I said. Thanks for making that clear to everyone in the thread you pathetic faggot.
>>155576449>Nuh uh!
>>155576483>f-false flag! Obsessed>>155576497Mindbroke
>>155576160>>Literally outlines DEI, and the effects in the workforce and employment that it has>>155576139>the outlines of what DEI is and where it occurs in the various parts of employment as a form of employment discriminationLike what? It doesn't actually make any specific claims about DEI's affect on the workplace. It makes hypothetical statements that are vaguely loaded. All the statements are mostly worded such that it says IF this DEI is discriminatory, then it is illegal. It doesn't actually say DEI is discriminatory and illegal. You could swap the word DEI for religion in the page and it would still be accurate. https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work
>>155570741anons these days underestimate how an all-around lolcow Dobson really was
Hours and hours of arguing simply because one motherfucker wants to "argue" the finer points. Bots should study these kind of threads so they can efficiently filibuster once they're the ones running countries.
>>155576500It is not a non sequitur to ask how I backpedaled after being accused of backpedalling.>>155576258
>>155576265What causes this
>>155576522>>155576425>>155576372It's kinda funny and really sad how desperately "totally not schizotroon" wants to make the thread about himself.
>>155576575>>155576297
>>155576587ack! it's the schizotroon!
>>155576522It’s just you and you outed that you’re dualfagging to samefag. Figures you’re this pathetic.
>>155576570You're trying to be pedantic but >>155576194 never said you were (except as a hypothetical in asking if you're arrogant enough to think you could get away with it). Meanwhile every other claim there is unaddressed. Try again.
>>155576487>No it wasn't. It was just dismissing it because of the administration's stance on it. You're backpedalling here.There is no backpedaling going on here. Here's the first post.>>155575703>That's not an admission, because it's not coming from a government that supports DEI. It's coming from Trump's admin who is against DEI.It is not saying it is true or false because it's from Tump. It's saying it is not an admission, because it is coming from trump. If biden said his own DEI related programs are immoral discrimination, that would be an admission.It's like this example here: >>155576242
>>155576629This you? >>155576478
>>155576487>Because it's YOUR words. YOU defined them as anti-DEI. YOU identified the concept, and from that the division in views on the concept, and judged where the Trump admin falls on that distinction.NO. THEY defined themselves as anti-DEI.This is what Trump's exectuive order said: "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing". In case that's not clear enough, Trump's executive order explicitly tells you he thinks DEI is immoral.>The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI), into virtually all aspects of the Federal Government, in areas ranging from airline safety to the military. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/29/2025-01953/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing
>>155576265how pathetic
>>155576644No that’s your post where you show you’re posting from your phone and pc to samefag. Since (You)s don’t carry over across devices.
>>155576551>Word games and semanticsYou're a bot and/or playing stupid and I'm not responding to your idiocy anymore past this point.
>>155576669You're so uniquely pathetic, are you the same guy in the first pizzacake thread that was tweaking out over a thread "from a few months back"? Is that why you're so obsessed over the schizotroon?
>>155575485>The schism with this pivot is that you're trying to change the argument entirely from "DEI does/doesn't exists and is/isn't ethical" to "Anon didn't post a definition!" Given that the definition exists outside of anon, as demonstrated by the anon that posted government recognition of the term, that's a moot point, albeit bad form on >>155575373's part.He was also acting as though merely posting a definition of a term is the same as pretending it doesn't exist.If someone's having trouble answering basic questions like that or the definition one, it's hard to have any sort of discussion with them.
>>155576613>look in archive>posted pic two other times>both threads are him samefagging and having the same kind of tantrumYou really must hate pattern recognition. https://desuarchive.org/_/search/filename/1780523401156511.png/
>>155574620>>155576680
>>155572181>Bob...were like standard progressives.MovieBob wants to kill people who disagree with him, so yes.
>>155576705He's right every time
>>155576613Your argument is that you're not schizotroon, you're a rabid fanboy.Also are you going to tell me that I'm not going to find a single schizotroon pic in https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/154026785/#q154032027 ?
>>155576701 here>>155576705>last time this was posted was JuneConfirmed
>>155576701>no u patheticNow that you have outed that you are posting from two devices to samefag you need to try and deflect and throw back what I said to you because it pissed you off even more.
>>155576551>You could swap the word DEI for religion in the page and it would still be accurateexample:>Under Title VII, DEI initiatives, policies, programs, or practices may be unlawful if they involve an employer or other covered entity taking an employment action motivated—in whole or in part—by an employee’s or applicant’s race, sex, or another protected characteristic.can be changed to >Under Title VII, Religious initiatives, policies, programs, or practices may be unlawful if they involve an employer or other covered entity taking an employment action motivated—in whole or in part—by an employee’s or applicant’s race, sex, or another protected characteristic.while still being accurate.
>>155576720You’re not, and pretending to be other people to suck yourself off isn’t going to change that.
>>155576551>>155576740It literally and specifically highlights and outlines DEI and DEI initiatives and other terminologically like "reverse racism" in it's wordage.
>>155576739It really is you. You're going to be obsessing over this conversation for another 3 months
>>155576774>>155576735No I just checked the archive to see if you were the retard who spams this shit and lo and behold it was you. Same file name and everything. And realizing that you fucked up you need to try and talk to yourself and cry how anyone that notices you is obsessed when this image is spammed regularly under different file names. But that specific one just so happened to lead to a thread you were doing this in months ago.
>>155572181There is no other like movieblob, he has no filter and at Dobson's worst he never called for genocide, also no one gives a shit about his videos or books when people still tag on dobson for his comics, it's literally just his tweets from the blobIm still mad that all of his books are just autistic stupid shit and not a version of "mien kampf" I would unironically pay money to read that
>>155576663In addition, you can definitely have a group of people who supports a term and another group of people who are against a term, while both of them heavily disagree about the term even means.
>>155576792I was one of the people clowning on you in the replies Very entertaining that you came back after all that
>>155576708>2016+10>still can’t meme>still making strawmen to cope>using ai too
>>155576642>It's saying it is not an admission, because it is coming from trump"I didn't ad hom THIS, I ad hommed THAT! Therefore, you're wrong!"It's not even a good pivot. Contrary to what the other Chinese bots on r/politics tell you, Trump is, in fact, the US president.You can try to double-down and go "bit the administration changed, so nobody admitted anything," but anon said "the government" as a collective, and I don't think enough boards have changed to even humor a Ship of Theseus distinction.>>155576708The best the left has is an AI pic where the "unintelligible speech" is just racial jargon the author clearly knows, where the strawman is actually right.
>>155576821No you were the faggot that posted the pic since you posted the same one with the exact same file name here, that’s the clincher here, no one brought the thread up randomly, you posted a pic from it and I saw it after looking in the archive. And now have to lie because you were caught and attempt to make it seem like you’re smug.
>>155576793Schizotroon made this because someone called him a pedo.Let that sink in.
>>155576829>The best the left has is an AI pic where the "unintelligible speech" is just racial jargon the author clearly knows, where the strawman is actually right.So you're saying>Jeets in the wifi, the router is muttified by corn syrup hands.is correct?
>>155570724What's the joke?
>>155576829>You can try to double-down and go "bit the administration changed, so nobody admitted anything," but anon said "the government" as a collective, and I don't think enough boards have changed to even humor a Ship of Theseus distinction.He did fire a lot of people on boards, including at the EEOChttps://www.citizensforethics.org/news/analysis/president-trumps-firing-spree-includes-his-illegal-removal-of-two-eeoc-commissioners-undermining-protections-for-american-workers/https://www.npr.org/2025/01/28/nx-s1-5277103/nlrb-trump-wilcox-abruzzo-democrats-labor
>>155576854It's a slow board, these threads go fast, and they're basically a freak shows for the lurkers. A lot of people saw you schiz out "a few months back" and it's doubly funny how badly that seemed to scar your psyche even more
>>155575939>Your hypothetical is predicated on assuming Biden's order being fair, which is also what you're setting out to prove. No, it's not. It's only predicated on the person (who is against Trump's order) believing Biden's order is fair.
>>155576889>It's a slow board these threads go fastYou’re not addressing how you’re not the retard who posted it in those other threads and just accusing me of being the same person you were beefing with in them. >A lot of people saw you schiz out "a few months back"You’re projecting extremely hard, especially since all I did was look in the archive, you’re the one going into it and saying I am the other people from those threads.
>>155575939>That's unfounded, especially given that only a few posts ago you were arguing that nobody gave a definition fo what DEI is and No, I was pointing out that a specific person had not given a source for their definition, despite how they were claiming to have already done so before a specific point in the thread.There were definitions given in the thread before that point, but it was a definition they seemed to disagree with.>only reluctantly conceded it was a thing after your piss-poor confirmation bias attempt in >>155575703 accidentally admitted it.That's not an admission. I never said DEI didn't exist.
>>155576862>>Jeets in the wifi, the router is muttified by corn syrup hands.>is correct?I'm not saying it's a real phrase, but that's perfectly intelligible.>jeets in the wifi>Indian people are inside our wifiUnder there's a noticable number of Indian users in the local WiFi network, or an Indian connection is launching a man-in-the-middle attack. Either way, it's works as a phrased object, probably answering some question bluntly, like "why are all of our local MAC addresses allocated?">the router is muttified by corn syrup hands.>the router is mixed-raced by Americans>The router's hardware was modified by an American company.This is perfectly eligible and has some nice flow with the previous statement, as if the WiFi is also slowed down by a third party hardware change.
>>155576912I will admit that this is the first point you've taken.
>>155576940>but that's perfectly intelligible.Only to people who spend too long on right wing circles or 4chan. It's not intelligible to normies or the average twitter user.
>>155576934Your grievances against that guy are sound, and that's why I said it was bad form on his part, but that doesn't excuse you making this meta-point the crux of your pivot away from the gaslight you intended with >>155574570
>>155576978It's just two normal English phrases with three jargon terms swapped in. It's not a grand cypher.
>>155576763Again you could replace it in this line>7. When is a DEI initiative, policy, program, or practice unlawful under Title VII?change that to>7. When is a Religious initiative, policy, program, or practice unlawful under Title VII?And you'd still have the same next part:>Under Title VII, an employer initiative, policy, program, or practice may be unlawful if it involves an employer or other covered entity taking an employment action motivated—in whole or in part—by race, sex, or another protected characteristic.[13]
>>155576551>>155576763I think parts like this are the most direct about saying what they think DEI is:>In the context of DEI programs, unlawful segregation can include limiting membership in workplace groups, such as Employee Resource Groups (ERG), Business Resource Groups (BRGs), or other employee affinity groups, to certain protected groups.[30]>Unlawful limiting, segregating, or classifying workers related to DEI can arise when employers separate workers into groups based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic when administering DEI or any trainings, workplace programming, or other privileges of employment, even if the separate groups receive the same programming content or amount of employer resources.or maybe this part:>8. Can an employer excuse its DEI-related considerations of race, sex, or another protected characteristic, provided that the protected characteristic wasn’t the sole or deciding factor for the employer’s decision or employment action?You can clearly tell the point of view of the page and that it thinks DEI involves discriminating against white people or other majority groups. The page ultimately doesn't prove or disprove anything about what DEI involves.
>>155570741Fpbp>>155571028/thread
>>155577162Has been since a year, IIRC correctly. ONE FUCKING YEAR OF DEFENDING TEMU FEMALE DOBSON.
>>155577169
>>155577133 ---> >>155577140It really is amazing how they can just deconstruct and play word games and semantics until you can muddy the waters and whittle the argument down to nothing to get the heat off that it's an issue and concept. Really gets the noggin a joggin about how meaningful and impactful this is, with how much they're doing defense work for this key concept so vigorously.
>>155577210What is she his mom or something?
>>155577313one way to find out is to have the jannies ban certain people and see with posts disappear
>>155577140>You can clearly tell the point of view of the page and that it thinks DEI involves discriminating against white people or other majority groups. The page ultimately doesn't prove or disprove anything about what DEI involves.To elaborate a bit, while you get some idea of what the author thinks DEI involves, you wouldn't be able to explain much of how a DEI program works after reading the EEOC page. You can tell it thinks DEI programs can cause unlawful segregation, but it doesn't tell you why or how. It doesn't give an example policy that causes the segregation.Overall, it's implicit standpoint is clearly DEI causes discrimination, but it doesn't go into details of how or why. Or which aspects it thinks is unfair. Hence, it's vaguely accusatory. Making a concrete statement would be something like saying "race based weighing of SAT scores by colleges is unfair". The article doesn't do that.
>>155577328It's come to that. Just last week, Image Dump Fag started spamming up nearly to image bump limit and couldn't even stop or delete the non-/co/ shit. It got so bad, another thread got raided by him because of a r/atheist reject spamming in two threads. It's like the AI mods have officially been mindbroken to the point they were malfunctioned now. They couldn't pruned any shit schizo thread half the time and remove vaguely lewd art even if they were spoilered.At this point, the dead internet theory may become a reality.
>Barneyfag isn’t real>stolasfag isn’t real>dedicated schizos spamming shit never happens>you’re crazy>don’t believe your lying eyes
I've seent it.
Me? I am already Halfxehanortfag.
>>155577378
Jeet melty
I wish Pizzacake would let me snuggle with her in bed as she babbles about her diet coke socialist views and whatnot but it's okay because she calls me a good boy for listening to mommy
>>155577486No, anon, no.
>>155577394Schizotroon has been spamming multiple threads here and /v/?
>>155577486She's already got a liberal beta male for that, she wants to get wrecked by nazis now
>>155577547isn't one of her kids parent actually a painter she cheated on with
>>155577561>painterYes anon think about it. A "painter" who cucked a beta male and gave her a life long obsession with nazis...
>>155577605no I mean a blue collar worker who want painting their house
>>155577614That painters name was Adolf Hitler
>>155576809.......does movieblob really think he's one of The Elite?
>>155577473Did anyone ever tell this cunt that in order to be a "real nazi" you gotta be registered with the actual nazi party.Which dissolved in May 1945 btw.
What a pity board this became now.>This shit Pizzacake thread stays up longer with deleted replies>Image Dump Fag has a thread at the moment>Minimoyfag has up and AI Tailsfag got triggered out of nowhere because of MadonnaTalk about managing a crappy site now, huh Hiro?
>>155570724I dunno but I wanna fuck her
>>155577894And Guy patrols a John K thread
>>155570724Yeah she is. Except I've seen her naked.
>>155570724Whatever else can be said of them, furry artists are routinely much more skilled than this.
>>155570724god she's unfunny
Now that the thread is back on track, how fucked is the right this November?
>>155578250You mean you got the go ahead from your fellow axewounds on the janitorial staff that all the people mocking you were banned?
>>155578250hopefully dead and buried
>155578250My reply got nuked amongst this hellhole of a thread and it's your fault Hiro gonna give me a random rangeblock applied to me, because of your pointless spam and the faggot mods hating me and my orangadog meme. Prepare to face the consequences from the other anons and me!
>>155578284Yeah I got on my schizotranny hotline directly to hiro and told him to ban you for disagreeing >:(
spergs need to be publicly punished and humiliated learn to cope with your surroundings like the rest of us or perishespecially the racist, abusive and predatory anons
>>155578316Or you’re just a janny and cried to one of the mods to ban everyone who was mocking you. Trannies love making up hyperbolic scenarios while ignoring the mundane realities of a situation.
>>155578357You’re really mad everyone noticed you were that schizophrenic axewound throwing having another melty huh?
why am i supposed to make fun of the troon for allegedly being on for hours when the other retard yelling at him seemingly has been on for the same time
>>155578388Oh you're totally right, which means this is all pointless for you and you should go back to your discord or whatever ;^]
>>155578430
