same rules as last time:>post pictures of women growing biggerthat's it.>how's this different than the main /size/ thread?sometimes it's more about the journey than the destination mateother things are allowed (like breast expansion, feet, ass, etc) if female giantess growth is the primary point of the image.>no dudes>no girls that look like dudes>no AI sloppaLast thread: >>11434217
>>11496043
>>11496044the artist's name escapes me, I wonder if it was ever finished
>>11496045
>>11496046are there anons out there that genuinely prefer no nudity or clothes ripping at all? not the like "sfw" clothes ripping, you know what I mean, but no ripping whatsoever.if so, what's the appeal? genuinely curious
>>11496063
>>11496064
>>11496047I do like fully clothed growth. It's unrealistic (in an unrealistic fetish), it makes other anons seethe, etc. Why? Idk, some clothes really get me going, underwear, pantyhose, socks...fully impregnated with the girl' smell. Imagine them but huge now, that's kinda cool too. It's just a matter of personal taste.
>>11496044I miss when W00t did giantess art. Back in the old Oekaki days.
>>11496047clothes ripping tends to become literally all the story/pic/whatever is about. Like, if I see something with no clothes ripping, the growth/size of the giantess is the main focus. If there's clothes ripping, there's gonna be ridiculous amounts of close-ups of clothes ripping for the majority of the thing, and for whatever reason, if there's clothes ripping, it'll also usually stop at mini-gts sizes at most.
