Previous Thread: >>3084985/edg/ is the home of 1girl posting. Here, we share AI-generated pics of sexy anime girls and discuss latest advancements in 1girl-related technology.Remember to keep it /e/, as per board rules. If unsure about what you can or cannot post here, consult the sticky thread.> FAQ (check here first)https://rentry.org/edg_faq> Local UIsForge Classic (easiest and simplest for SDXL): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classicForge Neo (supports newer tech like Flux and WAN): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classic/tree/neoComfyUI (node based UI, most extensible with custom nodes): https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI>Online Image GenFree no account: https://frosting.ai/ | https://perchance.org/Free Account Required: CivitAI, Tensor.art, SeaArt.ai, pixAIPaid Only: NovelAI>Catbox:4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb> Resources and guidesUseful links: https://rentry.org/sdg-linkTags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groupsUpscalers: https://openmodeldb.infoWAN Video Gens: https://github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2>Useful Extensions/Custom NodesADetailerTag AutocompleteStealth PNG InfoInfinite Image BrowsingLama cleanerRegional PrompterControlNetDynamic Prompts> LoRAsLoRa training: https://rentry.org/59xed3LoRA Collections:https://rentry.org/illustrious_loras_n_stuffhttps://rentry.org/trashcollectshttps://rentry.org/zp7g6https://rentry.org/hdglorarepo> /edg/ logoOP: https://files.catbox.moe/uc2ntj.png | Anchor: https://files.catbox.moe/bx1lo2.png (more color schemes in the FAQ Rentry)> Related generals>>>/b/degen>>>/aco/sdg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/u/udg>>>/vt/vtai>>>/wsg/aicg
Request Anchor
>>3085376Requesting an uncensored version of this
Current Highlights Here:>>3085001>>3085002
>>3085374>suldeer
>>3085381Why aren't you reposting them? :(
>>3085382lost it
>>3085383people got mad at him for spamming it constantly but his autism can't handle it so the next best thing is linking to it in a previous thread
>>3085381So you're telling me that the spammer just made IA Schizo's dreams come true, basically, because now he got HIS thread with HIS highlights
>>3085384>>3085382Plz no bully. She's a 2000yo immortal, and she sometimes gets her languages mixed up.
>>3085388Dude was probably jonesing waiting on image limit judging by how fast he made the next thread. He lives for the highlights and not actually posting anything
>>3085377hello sir, please point out the faults in this comment:>>3085321I'm an avid learner and you seem very experienced
>>3085388i can't wait for the next crash out where he makes the op pic a screenshot of the archives again>>3085390how many times have you posted this image before?
>>3085391He had to post it ASAP since that last guy made the last thread at 298 images. No fairsies!
>>3085376>>3085219
>>3085394I'm sure he's writing up some paragraphs right now in third person to call out anybody who criticizes him
>>3085401Posting backlog?
>>3085388what is IA
>>3085187PK Anon, thanks for the prompt. I hope you don’t mind, but I rewrote it for Anima using this order: <style and quality tags>, <Pink anatomy tags>, <pose/angle/clothing tags for this image>, <background tags>Here's my prompt:>retro artstyle, 1990s (style), best quality, masterpiece, anime screenshot, anime coloring, nsfw,>pink (dragon pink), 1girl, pink hair, hair between eyes, long hair, light brown tail, cat tail, drill sidelocks, breasts, animal ears, cat ears, cleavage, collar, print collar, white collar, tiger print, dark-skinned female, green eyes, large breasts, neck bell, black stripes,>blush, sweating, looking at viewer, stocking, white tiger print stockings, completely naked, crossed arms, covering own breasts, sitting, closed mouth, smile,>simple background, white background,I noticed a conflict in your prompt. You included both “white tiger tail” and “light brown tail.” For the rest, I used tags from the LoRA dataset. I would be cautious about reusing your usual prompts from Illustrious and Pony, because not only is Anima different from what you are used to, but this LoRA is also different.I tested 10 random seeds, and the collar appeared correctly each time, so I hope this helps. I included 4 of the results here.
>>3085392NTA but his statement on character knowledge is just flat out wrong. The dataset cutoff for Anima is way more recent than Noob. Perhaps some low count characters aren't as well known by the preview model since it isn't that far into training, but by nature of the dataset it already knows more than base Noob. The only two real downsides of Anima are it isn't trained at as high of a resolution so traditional upscaling doesn't work that well and due to no CLIP (which is ultimately a good thing) artist mixing isn't as straightforward as on SDXL based models. With that being said, he's not wrong that the lora's captions and dataset are the issue.
>>3085393>how many times have you posted this image before?That one specifically? Just once before about a month ago iirc.
>>3085406Dataset cutoff seems irrelevant here, as she only has like 15 low quality pics and they're all very old.
>>3085406I didn't say that Anima is worse at character knowledge than Noob or other models. I was trying to say that it doesn't know Pink specifically, because she is so niche. So any faults in reproducing Pink are due to the LoRA, not the base model. I'm sorry if I worded that badly, so you guys thought I was shitting on Anima's ability to recreate characters in general. That's besides the point
>>3085408Yes, Jesus, thank you
>>3085408It is though? You literally tried to say Anima was worse at character knowledge.
>>3085402I made a set and I've been dropping the others in the last threads little by little. But since we got back to super fast threads I decided to dump the rest together so they don't get buried too much
>>3085395May be there is an extra hand or two, but you can pretend is one of the girls in the back row pulling the girls in the front skirt
>>3085411You aren't replying to me. That's someone else getting involved. I said this:>It is not necessarily better at character knowledge, especially for a less well-known character like Pink."necessarily" softens the claim. It means "not always," or "not automatically," which means,it does not automatically know niche characters like Pink better.But you know, it's besides the fucking point, because all I wanted to say is that the LoRA is at fault here, not Anima.I can't believe I'm giving English lessons on an AI porn board
>>3085414you said something incorrect again anon. no need to have a melty over it like last time
>>3085404atp I don't even know if that was really PK Anon who had an issue with Pink's collar, or if someone was trolling and posting bogus images and giving a false prompt.Whatever. Just wanted to help out the dude who loves Pink so much. The collar works and here's how to prompt for it. Fucking trolls everywhere, man. Spammer should burn this thread
>>3085415Hahahha, you are Patreonbro. I know that now. That's funny man
>>3085413>same outfit>same pose>showing too much skinnot exactly what I intended, but at least the faces are right and there's different hair colorscare to prompt again?
>>3085415kinda sounds like you parsed english wrong
>>3085418Well, yeah, I won't say it's impossible but getting 12 girls all in different poses different outfits and showing the right amount of exposure would be quite challenging no matter how much seeds you try.For that you would need to limit to 3-4 girls at most
>>3085421ass
>>3085423>>3085418>>3085413you'll have a better time genning stuff like this piecemeal
Hey /edg/,Do you clowns realise that you are the runts of the litter when it comes to AI generals on 4chan? Even /degen/ has higher quality standards than you, and they're all pedophiles, for fuck's sake.I urge you to visit literally any other AI general, and the sheer sloppiness of /edg/ will become clear by comparison.And to top it off, nobody else boasts the same amount of bickering and infighting as you. So not only are you the worst, but you hate yourselves. You really are the saddest, loneliest collection of bastards on the internet.
hmm yes i have given this post the attention is deserves and have determined that the poster is....brown
>>3085423agreed, 12 is actually too many to fit in the frame of the last piclet's try 5
>>3085420I remember when this character was popular, good times
>>3085426there's a slop thread on /tg/ that's really, really, really behind the times, actually. there's also /vig/ on vg which used to be the dall3 /v/ thread(until they got kicked out) which is also really, really bad on top of being filled with blatant schizoposting.
>>3085430dude I don't think this is the flex for /edg/ that you think it is
>>3085426>Do you clowns realise that you are the runts of the litter when it comes to AI generals on 4chan?I don't know, I don't visit other AI generals except very ocasionally /h/ and /vp/>I urge you to visit literally any other AI general, Why I would do that? That's like me asking you to go and visit... I don't know, /toy/ for example, Would you do it when not interested in toys?Same way I'm only interested on AI of girls nude or in sexy clothing but without being full blown /h/
>>3085429super sonico has never been very popular really. Not even inside Nitroplus works. Is an example of failed postergirl
>>3085431I never alluded that edg was good(it is in fact, very bad). Just pointing out that there are at least two threads that is below it. I don't interact with either of those threads but very occasionally check them - similar to marveling at animals in a zoo.I'd hazard a guess edg might be the worst of the porn threads but I have zero motivation to try and compare to the aco thread(s) so it's a mystery.
>>3085417i think last time you had a melty you also called everybody disagreeing with you the spammer as well
>>3085435Hmmmm, nope, not a mystery at all. Categorically, the worst of the bunch.
>>3085427>is deserves>browns making fun of other browns for being browntale as old as time
>>3085436>assumes continuity between anonymous posts and blames anonymous posters for things other anonymous posters didwhat causes this?
>>3085417>Patreonbroalso i forgot to add imagine calling a spammer a "bro". this general really is full of leddit tourists>>3085439the post i was responding to is doing exactly that lol
>>3085435I do not think /edg/ is good, but honestly, none of the porn boards has good stuff, simply the more horny the bunch the more low their standards.I mean, take the /aco/ thread for example, or the /d/ threads, is not as if the gens there are better than this. But people in /d/ would be awe at that penis with phimosis with a lace ribbon on the tip, ignoring the rest of the image is a fucking mess and the hand is a doodle or the perspective makes no sense.If something I'd say /edg/ is on the mid-top tier when it comes to AI threads on 4chan. And at least here people is aware there is room to improve. People here may not be "good" but at leasts know they are no good. For others the standard of good is your giant horse penis to have proper veins. And is easier to get good proportions when all you have to do is a super obesse lady because super obesse bodies need no decent proportions, all they care is for them being fat.
>>3085441>And at least here people is aware there is room to improvegood joke.try pointing out errors or explaining how to improve something and watch someone spaz out, call you a nogen shitposter and have a meltdown over it.
>>3085440that's the other spammer, or at least, that's what the other spammer does. the ranfan spammer refers to the patreon spammer as patreonbro. they had a brief interaction that was very transparent and it was established then, i'm not gonna go back in the archives to show you though
>>3085439>The anon talking about the same pink lora with the same tone and getting extremely defensive in the same way and then doing the responding in the same way by calling everyone a spammer is different from the other anonPattern recognition is a thing>>3085441>I do not think /edg/ is good, but honestly, none of the porn boards has good stuff, simply the more horny the bunch the more low their standards>If something I'd say /edg/ is on the mid-top tier when it comes to AI threads on 4chanLmao you had me in the first half
>>3085443wait. who
>>3085441I'm gonna take a wild guess, you've never genned in your life
>>3085446hey he probably has if you count low res saas gens. it's also about time for one of them to call all these text posts the same person btw
>>3085445there are two spammers (at least). one of them spams ranfan and pink and other trash, i call that one ranfan spammer. one of them spams primarily pics with a pateron username, that's patreon spammer. ranfan spammer calls patreon spammer by the nickname 'patreonbro'
>>3085445>>3085448>wait. who..cares
>>3085434I mean she had her own anime and everything, but that was a long time ago
>>3085444>Pattern recognition is a thingyeah no you're still confusing multiple people for one person, bud.just as a piece of general advice, i would try to avoid doing that on an anonymous board. just because when you're wrong, you look dumb as shit to the parties involved
>it's this guy againoh no. he even started saying bud
>>3085452>it's this guy againoh no. he green texts at every opportunity
It would be funny if it turned out that this whole thread was just two people.
>>3085453did me hitting you with a who cares joke as a response to your pathetic /edg/ lore explanation make you upset?
>>3085457um, i'm guessing you wanted this to sting? but i'm just looking at it with utter confusion because i didn't mention anything about edg lore and you must be confusing me for someone else.god, that's gotta be embarrassing for you
>>3085460pale feminine male hands with painted nails wrote this
>>3085461>your point is wrong because I imagine you as an effeminate mancool fanfic, any rebuttal?
>>3085461nope? okay. sit down and stfu then
>>3085438actually it is 4 hours of sleep causing all the typos today, very sad
>>3085455>It's obviously Ranfan spammer and Patreonbro having a disagreement. They still both dislike IA Highlighter and Pink Anon. We need Smooch anon (AKA Mdf an Anon) to break the stalemate between the two. Perhaps we can ask Thread Theme Anon or Spam Userscript Anon for advice...We're halfway there to catching up to /b/ levels of f*ggotry (I'm sorry I have to censor in case that word triggers anybody!)>>3085461It's pic-related poster
Guys. Just post.
>>3085466>early may in india, yaar. too much heat, too much noise, mosquitoes. slept only 4 hours somehow
>>3085468ohhh i know why don't we come up with a quirky nickname for him. i vote clownbro>>3085470umm no sis? we're talking about important meta drama right now
>>3085468Yep, and this comment was written by Patreonbro himself
>>3085473True
>>3085422quite lovely, can you make a no pubic hair version?
>>3085468>>3085472Both Patreonbro. I recognise him now
>>3085476can you point out the other posts? you seem to be very adept at this
>>3085477Yeah sure, so you are Patreonbro, for one. Asking me to point out your other comments. So, the two I just did.and then maybe this one>>3085442and this one>>3085415
>>3085478oof. swing and a miss
>>3085470
>>3085478>it's the retard who plays guess who on the anonymous imageboard againi think i remember you too
>>3085481There's several of those though
>>3085478Well, I did say maybe. Makes sense because you say melty and the other anon said meltdown. But thanks for the extra contextual info, Patreonbro
>>3085481That's the basis of every argument on here
>>3085483i've heard this exact phrase on here before as wellare you esl?
>>3085486clicked on the wrong one. this is for >>3085484specifically>thanks for the extra contextual info
I want to believe this thread is about posting ecchi and not textual drama but you guys make it so difficult sometimes
>>3085487yes i am esl why?
>>3085480
>>3085490wow look it's the underwater anon! so many recognizable posters!
>>3085488Noice. catbox?
>>3085488The spammer will take a grudge on anyone that disagrees, He went all the way to pursue the highlights guy through different boards. He is fucking the threads because some old grudges from the /h/ board.He went all the way to stalk the pink anon all the way to civitai to get images and post them here pretending to be him because he seems to have some sort of grudge towards the pink anon too.So no one is gonna post an image together with an opinion to avoid identification and getting chased by him through several boards and even different sites
>>3085493It seems to be about all identifiable posters, not just those two. Also, did you forget he's the one spamming purple bitch
>>3085494>It seems to be about all identifiable posters, not just those two.This.
we're back to the it's all one guy segment
>>3085396>>3085493What's up IA. Took you long enough
>>3085491What? Who's underwater anon? Is there someone who just posts underwater images?Also, stop arguing, just post.
>>3085499>What? Who's underwater anon? Is there someone who just posts underwater images?that's the joke autism-kun
>>3085493>hijack multiple threads >don't actually contribute to them at all outside of begetting infinite shitposting>try your absolute damnedest to make them as bad as you possibly can, propping up and encouraging the lowest quality "genuine" posters that exist>ignore the calls from the actual regular contributors to fuck off>constantly be led on by obvious badactor shitposters who only wanted you to keep continuing to be a drama-ridden lolcow >somehow ends up being surprised someone decides to piss on your self-made shit cake>crash out to the point the shitposters who propped you up as a lolcow have more fun making fun of you rather than defending youmaybe it's time you take a long look in the mirror and figure out why this might be happening and make some adjustments.
>>3085404Much appreciated, bro.
>>3085493>The spammer will take a grudge on anyone that disagrees,The spammer will take a grudge against anyone he thinks is taking attention away from him. That's it.
>>3085502>you're the spammer>it's all for thread quality>lurk more>all one personi think i covered about all the typical responses they will hit you with
>>3085502>maybe it's time you take a long look in the mirror and figure out why this might be happening and make some adjustments.This is happening because a mentally disabled manchild grew up being enabled and never being belted up hard and often enough as he should.We can make the needed adjustements by tracking down his location and kindly teaching him some urbanity lessons through several punches to the mouth, swift kicks to the nuts and polite beatdowns, until the concept of 'consequences' finally takes root inside of his very, very fried up autistic brain.
Doesn't seem like he appreciated that truth nuke..
>>3085505I don't even care, man. I'm not shitposting, the post is sincere. The spammer is a fag but the reality is is that this thread has been so bad for the past year and a half that there isn't really anything being lost.>>3085507I like that you phrased that post in such a way that no one can actually decipher quite who you're referring to in this exchange. Keep up that energy.
I know the answer to every question and accusation raised on this thread, solely through esoteric and ancient magics passed down to me from my ancestors.No i won't provide any answers.
>>3085512>bulgeI knew that elf men could be difficult to distinguish from elf women, but this takes the cake.
>>3085497>tfw no BORGAR
>https://files.catbox.moe/ovns31.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/v7tpmo.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/xfukhw.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/mhh5u8.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/y8s2qz.jpeg
>>3085122It got an anime adaptation
>>3085519As long it is not a netflix adaptation.
>>3085519>Yuki-onna>Actually wendigosI like this.
Looks like our disabled non friend earned a vacation from this place. We will be nice and happy for at least 3 days. (Thanks, Mods.)
I been genning a ton of one of the characters from my template, lol.
>>3085376Request an Akane Tendo version
>>3085527fuck off sallerfag
>>3085528Who?
Okay, looks like genning more than 1 girl is still a problem using online generation wah.
>>3085404not pk anon but i appreciate the quick prompting guide. i've been having some issues with the so called "improved prompt adherence" (mainly with /u/ tier images) and i'm not sure if i'm being too wordy or the wrong kind of wordy. i'm gonna do some tests using this format
Wonder if someone made an updated .xml for the auto complete extension to account for the new database breadth anima has, I'm gonna assume no.
>>3085376Requesting Seras Victoria from Hellsing making sure her uniform is tight be for being a Police girl
Anyone wanna be roomies with these bitches?
You get to have all the body you want
>>3085547Can they cook and clean?
>>3085550Yes
>>3085594unf, catbox please
>>3085595Its a custom lora I made but here: https://files.catbox.moe/waio8j.png
>>3085596ty, fantastic body and breast shape
I think I may have cracked the way to prompt Mio for nudes without marinating her into it. You still need to get creative with how you describe what you want, but saying "Mio forgot to wear her clothes and underwear" worked out well.
>>3085598Thanks, I'm rather picky on lighting, skin texture, body shape and eye detail on my gens. I feel like I managed to get it in the right direction.
>>3085524?
>>3085606he can't help but bring it up once things settle down
>>3085519>dauntywhat slang is this
>>3085603your commitment to raping these models is amazing
>>3085541For that sort of stuff isn't grok better/faster?
trying out anima, to which i can finally say, what's up my fellow astronomy enthusiasts>>3085626maybe he meant doughty
>>3085603what are you talking about? Honest question.I think your post needs a bit of context.
>>3085507Um, you know this is the same lowest-common-denominator "if I ever saw u irl I'd beat you up" cartoon revenge fantasy kids have posted since ICQ was a thing? Just padded out with pseudo intellectual wording to make it sound deeper than it is. I'm sure you felt very cool writing this but it reveals you to be emotionally uncontrolled and desperate to appear intimidating. Fucking embarrassing and you should be grateful this place is anonymous
>>3085545
Does patreon allow loli content? I see all this pictures with characters like dawn and megumin with breasts and I feel curious to know if that's just the generator choice of if it is because patreon doesn't allow loli
well i'm definitely having more fun than i did before, even if fucked hands are suddenly a bigger problem again
>>3085525nerd foxgirl I assume
>>3085524I highly doubt anyone that has been spamming this hard would not bypass a 3 day ban.Now, for other types of bans I don't know but the 3 day ban is a joke. There is no way someone that can spam can't bypass it.So either is he got bored or if he actually got banned got banned with a different type of ban not the three days one
>>3085523>>3085639Lol. As one of the spammers I can tell you there are no bans to bypass. The most I've gotten is two warnings. Both funny stories.The 1st was when another anon posted loli to get the mod's attention to complain about me. He ate a 3 day ban for that.The 2nd was when I reposted one of IA schizo's gens (those horrible garish geometric ones that he puts in a catbox when he bakes a new thread). The reason? "Off-topic", meaning that IA's gens are not considered ecchi enough for this thread, which is fucking hilariously ironic considering he claims ownership of the thread
>>3085681cool story bro
>>3085681I was not banned for posting loli, I wasn't even warned. The post I made was simply deleted.
>>3085683he was talking about this moron >>3075059
spamming is a thing, you waste your life in inane stuff after all, but can you not samefag with "I want to also spam" bullshit
>>3085686can you stop dismissing everything you don't like as a samefag
and the samefagging continues
>>3085688>>3085689the entire reason you retards have this spam war is because you refuse to have a conversation
>>3085522Thank you for your interest. We are very excited about this project. Here is the concept art for the characters in our upcoming adaptation by our talented nonbinary artist lead. The team made sure to respect the original creator's vision while adjusting the material to contemporary quality standards. Feel free to share on your social media.We also removed the anachronistic toxic male ""lead"" These ladies need no help; they kick ass!
Spammer is a good thing for /e/.Board activity is going up and everyone knows the only thing that matters is number going up.https://litter.catbox.moe/51bkdz.pngIf you don't understand it, at least 4chan administration does, and thankfully they are in charge.
>>3085685Ahh, I was the one demanding loli be posted. My post was deleted but since I posted nothing I broke no rules.
>>3085692If fake activity from one poster was all it took they could generate posts themseleves.
>>3085637can you make her galaxies bigger
it's hilarious how every time the spamming calms down some retard here has to make a snarky comment to instigate it. i'm convinced at this point it's intentional
>>3085637Because you're using a lora or some shitmerge checkpoint, not the anima base.
>>3085696We shouldn't be stepping on tiptoes all day to not wake up one bad actor.
>>3085695not really while making them still look good imo>>3085697that was (and this is) literally just anima base though? i only installed it today, haven't installed anything else
I just want to goon to anime girls...
>>3085698none of that changes the reality of what i said
>>3085699You're doing something to make it look like Pony, I don't know what. My gut feeling is whatever that is is also ruining her fingers.
>>3085696the spammer is obviously tired of this since he got nothing at all and probably even he realized he won't get anything in the future either. A couple of weeks ago he would be here nonstop 24/7 filling threads and oppenning new ones (at some point there were like 12 threads).Now he only appears once in a while and drops a few pics if someone has been using the thread in the last minutes.Won't get away entirely, that people never leaves entirely, but the worst is over
lol
>>3085700name an anime girl you want to goon at and I will try to provide.
>>3085698Well, there's stepping on tiptoes and then there is baiting and instigating the spammer. When we had the "truce", one guy went off on a rant saying the spammer has no power, so there can't be a truce, and so on. Which is just retarded because we're not saying the spammer has power, but the spam is a real thing that undeniably ruins the thread that he can choose to stop.So that rhetoric is pretty pointless and only serves to incite the spammer.
>>3085705aqua
>>3085703>but the worst is overThis is what we're talking about. You can't know that, and you're only inviting the spammer to prove you wrong
>>3085703>thread completely ruined for weeks to the point barely anybody is here except for three people>more than half of every thread revolves around discussion regarding the spammer>idiots get themselves banned over reporting>we're winning
>>3085702dunnohere's the prompt sans the six or seven artist tags
>>3085711why even go through the trouble of hiding the artists. nobody cares about your dogshit mix bro
>>3085712i feel comfier this way
>>3085712Just look at the quality tags. It's a civitjeet
>>3085714i installed anima today and looked at the release to learn how to prompt it, that's what they have up there as recommendations
>>3085712You so gonna regret those words when he makes it big on x (formerly known as twitter).
>>3085716kek i'm sure. he does have a "career" on civitai with how badly he managed to pony slopify klopsiak on anima
>>3085712Because! If he gives the artists then someone could copy his cool style that he, um... plagiarised from six or seven actual artists.
>>3085715>looked at the release to learn how to prompt it, that's what they have up there as recommendationsnot really, try reading it again>six or seven artist tagssome artists are bound to affect the anatomy
you guys sure are talking a lot of shit when a few days ago you were whining the spammer is going to steal your artistmix, lmao
>>3085720>you guys sure are talking a lot of shit when a few days ago you were whining the spammer is going to steal your artistmix, lmaohuh? when did this even happen. also are you really this stupid? you know it takes like 30-40 images and 40 minutes to bake a lora of any style, right?
>>3085721it was the repeatedly given reason for refusing to post catboxes over the past month or two
>>3085711You are using kind of contradictory tags there, score_9 is the "masterpiece" "best quality" score_7 is midtier, so you are telling you want both a "mid" picture and an amazing picture.But well, it doesn't matter, I think the true problem here is the artists. I don't know who they are, but there are LOT of them. If put lot of artist in there you may overload the image the same way would be if you used 7 different lora, and when you overload the image things are gonna start to be messy and melty, and hands are the very first thing that suffer that.Either remove some artists from the mix or control the weight of the artists
>>3085707
>>3085724>>3085719okay, thanks for the advice anons
>>3085723i don't remember this at all but i still find your attempt to hide your mess of an artist mix amusing. i'd train a lora on your shit as a joke but it looks like dogshit so i'll pass
>>3085727i don't plan to spam so it's not like you could
>>3085728https://civitai.com/models/2544636/wai-animahere bro this model is more up your alley. it matches your brown skin
>>3085729my skin is pale and my eyes are light blue so i won't click that :)
>>3085729I don't think he'd get the joke considering he's probably a tourist that doesn't even know the difference between a model merge and a base model
>>3085725wife
>>3085711>>3085724I agree I would drop the Pony tag.There may also be a conflict between one or more artists and the style tags "traditional media, watercolour". You might be indirectly telling the model not to prioritise fingers. I would also cut down the NL portion. Ask yourself what do you need the NL for that tags can't provide (the Galaxies text being one) and then restrict it to that
>>3085731The "joke" is that there's no difference. The model elitism is made-up bullshit for autists that need to feel good about all the time they wasted on gooning to ai porn.
>>3085725I just realized I had the illustrious model set because I was coloring with controlnet, here is the anima version
>>3085734ladies and gentlemen, /edg/ and why you should never come here for lora training advice
>>3085725>>3085735>>3085736my cup runneth over...thank you anons
>>3085734This is the kind of poster to train on AnyLora unironically
>>3085737mate, never worry about lora training, you've got bigger problems than that. You need to work on your English comprehension first of all. Anon didn't say anything about lora training
>>3085735
>>3085740it's ok tourist i didn't expect you to understand the connection there anyways. just resume posting your pony slop
>>3085735kawahagitei?
>>3085734shitpost or retard?
Hi, how we doing these days?
>>3085743surprisingly similar, but no this is (@ebora, @asanagi:0.6)donut steel
>>3085734>The model elitism is made-up bullshitI find always amusing how the last thing is the best thing and everything else is shit. Is funny because when you have been on this long enough you see how the pattern works.As in, when pony came out it was like the second coming of christ, everyone was amazed.Then when illustrious came out pony was SHIT it was incapable of doing anything but slop, has sepia colors, yadayada and And illustrious was the only possible model to work with.Not that long ago same with noob, this one didn't really catch that much between the mainstream audience, but around 4chan threads you could see the same "illustrious is shit, can only do slop, doesn't get artists yadayada".And now with anima is all the same all over again.Now, its obvious that newer better models are newer and better, but that doesn't mean those you have been using for a year were shit. You've been using them for a year and were satisfied with them! You even said it was amazing at some point.
>>3085747>its obvious that newer better models are newer and betterIs it though
>>3085746I could tell ebora but I would have not guessed the asanagi in there
Ain't even Halloween
>>3085747wai anima is just some shitty lora(s) merged into the base model. you can achieve the same "stabilizing" effect it has on anima by just using any lora at low str without the style bias. the fact that you can't understand that simple concept and are trying to equate it to actual base models that were the next best thing like illustrious, noob, and now anima is why people say this place is full of idiots. because frankly, it is
>>3085745Kinda like this.
>>3085751He didn't say a single thing about waianima though
>>3085751the hell are you talking about? I only mentioned the base models and how harsh people are with them once the next cool one is out despite praising them a lot when those were the new ones.
>>3085747>but that doesn't mean those you have been using for a year were shit. You've been using them for a year and were satisfied with them! You even said it was amazing at some point.yeah it kind of does. just because it's the best we have at the moment doesn't mean it isn't shit. local models are completely dogshit compared to proprietary models like gemini and nanobanana. and if there was a scenario where one of those juggernaut funded models became open source with the ability to run at a reasonable speed locally, i guarantee you everyone would swap to it and immediately start calling the models they used beforehand shit. don't be retarded and get sentimentally attached to a model
>>3085754>>3085756reading comprehension? anon's quoted green text is a post in response to my post about wai anima where he calls me out for "model elitism" saying there's no difference between wai anima and anima base
>>3085748Yes it is. Just because this place always lags behind by weeks to adopt new things doesn't mean said things are not better
>>3085747>As in, when pony came out it was like the second coming of christ, everyone was amazed.literally since pony appeared people who had taste called it ugly yellow slop which it was.
they still didn't ban patreonfag?
>>3085753still so cute
>>3085761normally i’d say that’s the obvious tell it’s a shitposter but it is this place so i wouldn’t be surprised if he was being serious
>>3085762ban for what? posting ecchi on an ecchi board?
>>3085759but are things really automatically better just because they're new?
>>3085767Of course not. That’s not what the other anon said. Read it again because I’m not walking you through it
>>3085762despite all your rage, you're still just a rat in a "this is an image dump board" cage.
>>3085767Yes, as long as are not heavily censored. People still laughs remembering SD 2
sloppy oni
>>3085773Cool artstyle
>>3085631Mio (the character in the image) is an ai chatbot on the pixai website. You can use her to use natural language to collaborate with the bot to generate images and after the images are done, you can use natural language to tweak or adjust the images. She uses her own specialized checkpoint for images of herself which isn't available outside of this chatbot. And she specifically blocks straight up NSFW requests. If you were to ask her to generate an image of her naked with her nipples and pussy out with her legs spread, she would tell you she can't do that and suggest something more tame to produce. The website allows you to generate nudity and the like, it's just the bot that doesn't allow specific terms. And even if you do manage to circumvent the blocked terms with creative wording, after an image is generated, you can see the specific words it used for the prompt. And in every image the bot makes it has "nudity, nude, nsfw" in the negative prompts. But anyone who has generated images for a while knows that negative prompts are more of a suggestion than the law.So ultimately, it is just a word puzzle to circumvent blocked terms to get what you want with very limited attempts per day (10). Pic related is one of my earlier attempts today. Basic jist was "Mio is on the train but she forgot her shorts and underwear!"
>>3085765It it a little bizarre when you think about how all the drawthreads manage to survive. A single person could ruin them all, perhaps all at the same time. There's technically no rule against posting whatever you want in there, and the off-topic rule seems to only apply site-wide.
>>3085765Rules 6, 10 and 13
>>3085779Ok, thanks for the explanation. Now I understand your prior post. No offense but you said it as if was common knowledge and is not.Just for the record, if you have fun tricking the system into making nudes of her despite being blocked, fine. I hope you keep getting fun. But just in case, IF by any chance what you want are nudes of her...you know you can make a lora of her even if its an exclusive character, right?>>3085773catbox please? I'd like to try this mix, casually the last days I've been doing fate characters in similar outfits to that. I go for a more of an animy style, but I'd like to see how they look like with that style that feels kind of like a VN portrait
what is "IA schizo"
>>3085789It's the linguistic jousting that I find amusing. I take different approaches each time and see if I can get the results I want. It's like a puzzle. The nudes are just a bonus.
>>3085781>how all the drawthreads manage to surviveBarely. Some threads have been consistently request spammed by one guy for years. Lately he started spamming AI threads too.
>>3085790some guy that plays infra arcana
>>3085794it's sailerfag
>>3085800Don't know who sailerfag is. The guy I was talking about hasn't showed up in /edg/ (and most likely never will)
>>3085801nvm it's someone else then
>>3085475
>>3085809the heck is that on her jaw
>>3085789here's the box https://files.catbox.moe/gnocyf.png
>Tried anima today and it didn't work well >See people here get good resultsGuess I fucked up setting it
>>3085816Guess you'll have to suffer alone, since you didn't provide metadata for us to look at.
>>3085816>>3085817yeah anon, show us your unholy abominations
>>3085817>>3085818Already deleted it, but fuck it, I'll try again
we're on the ecchi board so let's see some ecchi
>>3085691>We also removed the anachronistic toxic male ""lead"" These ladies need no help; they kick ass!Of course that happened.
Ok seems like it works better nowHaving to use comfy directly is a bit annoying but I suppose I'd have to learn how to do that at some point anyway
>>3085816Been there. It needs some settings.Here are some things.-Make sure you got the VAE unlike XL it needs its own VAE-Make sure you got the text encoder in the text encoder folder (I someway missplaced it and I scratched my head about how the fuck it could not get even basic characters)-Set steps to 20-30 (25 for example)-Set CFG to 4-Sampler: DPM++ SDE-Scheduler: DDIMTry to not use highres since anima doesn't seem to work very well with it. But is not a must
I want to do a 4 frame animation. What's the best controlnet model to do specific poses with illustrious?
>>3085830That depends on your reference image
>>3085835How
>>3085828>-Sampler: DPM++ SDE>-Scheduler: DDIMthis will produce downright beautiful results, but is very slow. ER_SDE is fine, in my opinion.
>>3085742It's always hilarious when people reply to push back like this. No, I'm not the anon that you originally criticised. Yes, there are other anons in this thread that will call you out on your bullshit. Bro thinks he's in anon's private DMs or something? We all see your shit
>>3085836Well, is it lineart or a finished image; flat, 3D render or a photograph? You're asking for the best, they all specialize in one thing.If you just want the best general use one, try cn-anytest which kinda does a mix https://huggingface.co/2vXpSwA7/iroiro-lora/blob/main/test_controlnet2/CN-anytest_v4-marged.safetensorsno preprocessor
>>3085839lol there's literally no difference between DPM++ SDE and er_sde. This is all witchcraft and superstition
>>3085841It was the image I posted >>3085830
>>3085842well it's hard to compare because the image changes even with the same seed, but in my tests ddim consistently results in more painterly style, which I really like
>>3085815thanks>>3085839I think Anima in general is slow as fuck, and since its so slow IMO just a few extra time for better results is worth the trade.I mean, if it cut the time by a half I would also settle with a bit less of finishing in exchange of way faster gens. But since its taking a lot of time anyway I'm willing to wait some extra seconds
>>3085845damn, uploading without properly looking at the picture, it made it censored.Back to the gen it again
>>3085845>I mean, if it cut the time by a half I would also settle with a bit less of finishing in exchange of way faster genshttps://civitai.com/models/2560840/anima-turbo-lora
>>3085847No, thanks. That changes the style too much. I tried it a few days ago. Specially fucks up when you are using certain artists
>>3085376Requesting a fully nude Vocaloid IA in THAT pool >>3084999 She can be swimming or just walking around it. Thank you for your time.
>>3085843Just use anytest then, or depth with a depth preprocessor. Still not sure how you intend to make 4 frames out of a single reference but w/e.
>>3085847Anima turbo is for civit jeets. The real solution is preview 2....they shat the bed with preview 3 honestly, don't bother installing it, and hopefully they can course correct before the final release... Plus any custom style lora at 0.25 strength. You can use any style lora so long as it's over 2,000 training steps, it just adds more stability to the anima base and at 0.25 weight it doesn't interfere with the prompt too much. Also avoid pony tags because then Anima will revert to its Pony dataset and you'll have to correct white balance in Photoshop. Remember that Adetailer and things like Controlenet do NOT work with Anima (yet) so I recommend inpainting problems areas with wai-shuffle-noob.That is a crash course in Anima but let me know if you have any other questions
>>3085845It takes long because you're effectively genning at twice the resolution of SDXL, due to halved VAE compression. Even though the result is 1024 it usually doesn't need upscaling or adetailer.
>>3085850Never said I was going to. I think you might be too dumb to be giving advice. Does anyone have a second opinion? >>3085830
I just realised that IA schizo insists on baking these threads because every time someone replies to the request anchor he gets a (You), and because the thread shows up in the catalog with a pic he chose. And all that makes him feel warm and fuzzy inside. I feel sorry for the little critter
>>3085853good luckconsider that you might be too dumb at asking questions
>>3085830Canny
>>3085853Except for lineart that I use Kataragi for everything else I used to use "controlnet union" or something around that name.And I say used to because honestly with illustrious I prefer to just make the prompt and try a few times instead of using controlnet open pose, never fan of it.With illustrious unless is some hyper specific pose you shouldn't need openpose. And I wouldn't recommend it either.But if you want to, the uninon controlnet had all
>>3085855>I feel sorry for the little critter>littleno way a loser keeping track of multiple generals 24/7 with time spare to make a collage for each one is "little." dude probably doesn't leave his house
>>3085861Looks like shit. Did you go into Photoshop and apply a shitload of filters on this trash?
>>3085857>>3085858Yeah but the point isn't finding a controlnet that works 5% better, his use case makes no sense in the first place. You're not gonna get 4 animation frame variants with controlnet, that only reproduces the same pose.
>>3085863I think what he wants to do is to create 4 different images with illustrious, using controlnet to do 4 different poses of the same characterThen use those 4 images for the video generation
>>3085862No, it's direct model output. Glad you like it.
>>3085844>>3085839
>>3085872cuties
>>3085858The problem with union is that it likes to copy clothes too
>>3085872I recognize these artifacts!!Thought they were NAI exclusive, but now that anima uses flux vae too...
>>3085881>but now that anima uses flux vae tooare you retarded
>>3085869Don't worry, when you see there is a guy that is being mean for no reason to people that is only asking harmless questions or shares a picture you know the spammer is here and soon after is gonna start dumping nonstop.
>>3085866And controlnet can give you those poses. But his reference image is AI generated, and if the pose can be generated then why not generate it with the girl first time around?I suspect he might be looking for IP-Adapter instead, trying to keep the character consistent while genning her in different poses. Which doesn't exist for illustrious, only noobAI or base SDXL.
>>3085893Yeah, I noticed that too, I think the spammer hates when someone does that and punishes the thread for misbehavior
>>3085899nah, he's from /h/ and used to the culture of shitting on gens as a way to improvealso fits well with the rant about highlights promoting bad gens
how are the attempts for controlnet on anima going?
>>3085905you will never fool anyone
fish
>>3085888Ohhhh it's even worse. RIP that vae looks dogshit.
>>3085932so you're saying he's not the one shitting on gens, he's just moral policeand I'm trying to fool you into thinking he's worse thank he isdid I get it right?
>>3085940the fact you didn't even know what vae it uses is kind of embarrassing... i'd expect more from a shitposter
>>3085929It's supposed to not work?
>>3085947Now I know anima is basically SDXL-tier though thanks for info!
>>3085952You're welcome. Thankfully you being wrong doesn't really harm anyone else.
>>3085952sorry bro you already outed yourself :(
>>3085899More like the spammer hates when no one is playing her attention and when threads are not in her control.
>>3085955Literally a text-focused VAE that performs well on text and SDXL-tier dogshit on textures.1girls with signs, the model.RIP
>>3085947Where do you think we are? Even the shitposters are /edg/ tier
>>3085962>no one is playing her attention and when threads are not in her controlESL-kun?
>>3085977because of the typo in paying, or because of assuming a female gender
>>3085990Both, but mainly the gender thing. The bug men often mix them up
>>3085951xl needed its own controlnet models, you could not use 1.5 models.Same way, xl controlnet models don't work on anima, so with anima right now you can't use controlnet. There has been attempts but failed
Anima uses Qwen vae, not flux
crazy how it's all patreonslop yet it still mogs more than half of the shit poster here
>>3085998Oh I see.
>>3085998>>3086018There has been a new attempt yesterday, only canny but works much better than the earlier one.>>>/h/8875777
>>3086009I can give that some particular gens may be better than some particulars gens in these threads. But overall I wouldn't say any of that patreon stuff is better than what you see here everyday.It's simply lot more explicit compared to what is posted on these threads that is usually more tame and thematic, but that's pretty much all.
>>3086037i find the seaAI ones much nicer than the electroworld ones. also the opalnemy ones seem to have a lot of artifacts, wonder if that's just jpeg compression though
>>3085932>>3085905>>3085899naispammer?
OK I'm quitting this hobby until there is a model with proper VAE (again). Bye.
nice seeing you
>>3086037>It's simply lot more explicit compared to what is posted on these threads that is usually more tame and thematicit's actual ecchi unlike >>3086038 which might as well be posted on any sfw board. this place mainly serves as a hugbox for a few poeple to circlejerk first and a place to post ecchi second
>>3086045i actually like this place otherwise i would have already left because of the spam. i'm sorry you can't handle the uncomfortable truth
>>3085935
>>3086044https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8876282/
>>3086048none of the posts in that thread are ecchi though?
>>3086046Truth is, it's always been like this. So either you've been quietly stewing in anger for four years, or you're a tourist trying to change the general to suit you.
>>3086050i just lurk and appreciate the ecchi images while filtering out the ones circlejerking each other. it's amusing how defensive you and the other dude are getting over me saying that lol
>>3086051You're one or two posts away from the avatartroons labeling you the "spammer."
>>3086047tried black sclera on a whim
>>3086053don't care. if anything they just proved my point
Time for highlights!
come on schizo what's the hold up? you don't have to pretend to wait an hour to bake, everyone already knows you're lurking
bread is ready doe
>>3086085>>3086085>>3086085
>>3086086rent free
>>3086044>unlike >>3086038Ecchi is for both nudity and sexy stuff.A girl with a huge torpedo tits, perky nipples and tight dress is perfectly ecchi.And yes, you could post that on sfw boards, lot of ecchi stuff is posted on sfw boards all the time.
>>3086105
