A watch gets more pussy than you editionGuides and Info:>Classic Memehttps://imgur.com/a/6CNO8>Poorfag guide:https://www.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK>Watch essentials 102:https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV>Purchasing used watches:https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2>Purchasing straps:https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE"Suggest a watch for me.">Your budget>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet>Wrist size or desired watch sizePrevious thread: >>18175340
>he boughted an Omega
>>18176492>A watch gets more pussy than you editionLet's be honest, that's a real low bar
I wear a sterling silver bracelet on my right wrist all the time (I literally never take it off, I shower with it, I sleep with it)I recently came across a beautiful Orient Sun and Moon (picrel) and I wanted to buy it, but it's in rose gold (or at least it's coloured like that). I was always told to match my metals so I was apprehensive to get it, should I?And yes, the store did have a similar watch but in a silver steel colour. That never popped to me so idk
Your move?
>>18175914>fitness watchI'd rather stick to my F92w, but it's time for an upgrade.>>18175953>>18175997Why?I want to wear this, but I can't.
>>18176510>Hi, I'm [Anon] and I'm interested in [watch model]. Could you please let me know what the price is? Thanks.
i took the sapphire glass pill recently and holy moly is it a world of difference, it's so clear it's insane
I want this so much
>>18176510Not giving a fuck since it's probably there for money laundering anyway
Ok
>>18175988They will react to UV light, thus glowing under it, but they don't glow like normal superluminova. Apparently Omega did this for their Flightmasters as well, since it would illuminate the hands when flying if you have a UV lamp above (or, as I like to think, in a submarine below the water). But I don't know for sure why they did this. Granted, the colours will 'pop' when under water on a sunny day...maybe that's why. >>18176058Thanks - yeah, lots of 2599.80s on Chrono24. They were a flagship model for Omega when they first arrived in 1993/1994, but these days they are a steal for the engineering that was put into them. They were the first chronographs Omega produced that could be used at extreme depth underwater (i.e. you can use the chronograph when fully submerged). But these ones were also my favorite watch as a kid, so I had to have one.>>18176088Bless you, fellow 0100-Chad. Is it running well? Do you have a special day of the year to set it, like I do?>>18176108Also; I love your pics.>>18176495They're great watches! You should try one.>>18176629Nice to see you DrunkHamiltonAnon! How are you?Well Gentlemen, it is the end. My final watch came in this afternoon, and it's perfect. Bonus points to those of you who can guess what it is: here's a Lume shot of the new watch with my 2254.50 on the right...the two share many things in common, surprisingly. In my eyes, it is the perfect watch, in every way, from every angle, at every magnification. Buy what you love, Frens, and to hell with the rest!
>>18176633Great!
>>18176499Mixing color is fine but keep in mind the Orient Sun & Moon models are thick as fuck and really uncomfortable to wear.I wear mine for special occasions only because it's for everyday wear it's just not practical enough.
Stop buying sports watches.
>>18176510Respond without sounding upset
Mogs Switzerland hard
I really like the Nomos Club Neomatik. It has a 37mm case diameter and is only 8mm thin. But a 48mm lug-to-lug? What were the Germans thinking?
>>18176492Just came inBox papers everything From 1991
>>18176498Both the man and the woman are on the watch so the watch is just fucking itself
>>18176713Caseback
>>18176510"Yo this is your b-boy big dog and I was w-wondering the p-price of this watch.*cough* n-not that it's a problem haha"
>>18176712>polished bezel>polished centerlinks>polished lugsI hope you like scratches.
>>18176713What a tasteless bezel
I just want a Patek 3940 bros
I’m a literal 60IQ retard.Recommend a watch for me
>>18176766JCL Reverso>>18176633Is that a Reverso?
>>18176773Good advice for >>18176766>>18176768The Reverso is a midwit watch.
>>18176766Just get a Rolex.
>>18176766
>>18176633JLC Reverso 1931 Tribute.
>>18176499hahaha tard autismoing about mixing golds and he's buying a $150 watch lmomafowmooaaaaaaaaaaaaas who's gonna notoice miguel at the car washhhhhha hahhahaha
sittercel
>>18176712>But a 48mm lug-to-lug? What were the Germans thinking?They wanted long, gracefully tapering lugs. It's a design choice. The lugs don't stick straight out, though, they do curve down, so they follow the curve of the wrist.If that means it doesn't fit your girlfriend's slender wrist, sorry. I don't think this was marketed as a women's watch, though.
Alright lads, which one do i go for: SNE573 (would replace for a metal bracelet) or SSC819?
What time is it?
>>18176841Time to get a watch
>>18176843no
>>18176499I have Orient Sun&Moon limited edition (rose gold + blue)Don't listen to the other retards, it's not thick or uncomfortable, it's a gorgeous watch and irl I keep getting compliments, especially from girls. It looks way more expensive in reality than it isAnd the colors look good with almost anything, even though it's true that the blue (that your model doesn't have, so it will be matched even easier) matches better with my blue suit than my black clothes I wear usually. The rose gold is not a problem to match with other metals.It literally looks so good that when I went into my local watch shop to pick something nicer, I had to look for watches that cost $4000+ otherwise it would all look worse. Like, I would wear my Orient over most of those other watches.
>>18176863>irl I keep getting compliments, especially from girlsAnd when they ask how much it cost or they just look it up on their phone?
>>18176863Edgy, too big 4u.
>>18176864They have never asked me for that>>18176865Yeah right, nice try troll
>>18176863Just the right size for you and it looks beautiful.Wear it in good health, fren.
>>18176867I will, it's been 5 years and still running great ;) Thanks
Citizen The Citizen.
Need watch suggestions.Want a watch, something like an f91w. Want it to be cheap, it's for a festival so needs to be something not worth robbing. Under £50 ideally. Needs a stopwatch function that tracks 10+ hours and minutes, not just the 60 minute stopwatch. Also needs to be quite durable and splashproof. Give me suggestions.
>>18176899Casio F-91W
Are there any casio digital watches that are pleasant to wear during summer? I've mostly got metal ones but the sweat my skin makes when touching metal at 25+ degrees makes them unbearable to wear.I've reverted to wearing my old timey Timex watch but I'd prefer a nice casio digital one.
>>18176904The stopwatch is 60 minutes only no?
good morning sirs
>>18176785
>>18176841>What time is it?vacation time
>>18176923Valiant effort
I like it
>>18176943ok
It’s not piss.
>>18176945cry more faggot
>>18176948why not
>>18176966You got me there
Just wearing the MR-G today lads
Is a silicon hairspring really so bad?
>>18176943Is it $15,000?
>>18176768>>18176810Bingo! I'll try to take more pics soon; very busy right now. Have a great day, /wt/!
>>18176990Can we get a full collection pic?Oh, and it's kofe time.
>>18176943loltard
>>18176981No it's not, it is superior to regular alloy springs
>>18176766Any Grand Seiko would do. Other retards have already been impressed by the sprooooong drive technology, why not you too??
>>18176943>36mmYou a woman?
>>18177017Of course. If I was a man, I'd post a 42mm watch. Duh.
>>18176766Amazon essentials
>>18176974>he spent how much on a casio???
>>18177017>>18177020
>>18177029Someday you'll own a watch, Bittercel, and you'll understand the the difference between a men's and women's watch.
>>18177029I hate how the more I learn about watches, the more this meme feels true.
im from an upper middle circle rubbing shoulders with rich territoryI've been seeing more and more rolexes and omegas in insta stories, noone shows em off of course but its there. i know understand how woman feel about bags and shit. I think my Hamilton wont cut it anons, I should catch up
>>18177049No one cares about Omega.
>>18177049Here's the secret that /wt/ will absolutely fucking hate. (Which also means it's right.)You only need two watches: an Apple Watch and a really killer dress watch.For daily wear, an Apple Watch, potentially on a nice leather strap, like an Hermes or something is unassailable. Nerds will screech about something or other, but no one serious will actually care.For those instances where you want to dress a little fancier, that's when you put on your good watch. Just wear them under the cuff. The people who need to know what they are will noticeBecause dress watches aren't popular, you can get something in precious metal from a top-tier brand for under 10k USD. Cartier Tank LC, AP Jules Audemars, VC Patrimony, Piaget Altiplano, Breguet Classique, etc.
>>18177065I do
Forever poor. Keep wanting to upgrade my citizen. It must feel under appreciated. Diving in Mexico and Europe, switches time zone in seconds, radio updates time so always correct to the second, solar power, sapphire glass. Just how do I do better?
Stop me buying this
I just got another match with a cute black girl on Tinder. She immediately engaged the conversation.That's one thing I love about black women, they're not afraid to show interest. Can't wait to have sex with her.
"Suggest a watch for me.">under $10k msrp new, not interested in used watches>dress>handwound but auto is ok too>18k gold, day/date optional>cognac leather>~36mm
>>18176863>"Don't listen to the other retards, it's not thick">42.5mm diameter>13mm height>"it's not thick"LMAO bro.... it's objectively fucking huge for a dress watch.
>>18177080Doesn't exist. You'll have to buy vintage or neovintage.
>>18177083Which feature would I have to give up to find one that exists
>>18177079With a watch on your wrist, right?Otherwise this'd be off topic as you know
>>18177087You might be able to find a solid gold dress watch under 10k from some shit-tier brands like Baume & Mercier or Frederique Constant, but they'll be 40mm.What you're looking for pretty much disappeared in the 1990s. If I were you I'd look for neo-vintage, you can find some cool JLC, JLC or Breguet under 10k that tick all the boxes.
>>18177097>JLC, JLC or BreguetI meant JLC, Vacheron or Breguet
>>18177081if you're a wristlet, an Asian DYEL or a bitch, I guess so
>>18176712>>18176833nomos lugs are horrible and i will never buy a nomos because of this
>>18177109
>>18177111
>>18177076>diver's watchThanks I almost forgot
>>18177112
>>18177073what the tacometer does
>>18177114
>>18176840Anyone?
>>18177029What is this supposed to signify? Are those watches they owned? Wasn't Kerouac a poorfag? How would he have a Rolex?
>>18177142no retrad geta job
>>18177144>Wasn't Kerouac a poorfag? How would he have a Rolex?lollll tard thinks famous people are poorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ahahaha
>>18177144>What is this supposed to signify?Old good, modern bad.Work with everything: art, architecture, cars, clothings, white countries, etc.
>>18177070>Apple Watch plus dress watchBased.
>>18177116tacos per minute
People who think Omega deserves to be famous for the Shitmaster are retarded. It is a derivative watch, vastly uninspired. If anything, Omega deserves to be respected for the Constellation. Now that's something. But you're a bunch of empty skulls, I don't even care anymore.
>>18177193>ShitmasterThat could be one of several watches. Speedmaster, Seamaster, Railmaster, Globemaster.>If anything, Omega deserves to be respected for the Constellation.I assume you mean the old incarnation of the Connie when it was Omega's high-tech platform, not the current...whatever the fuck it is now.
>>18177194The Constellation is the vintage Constellation. There's no other Constellation.>Seamaster, Railmaster, GlobemasterAll shit.
>>18177194>That could be one of several watches. Speedmaster, Seamaster, Railmaster, Globemaster.Close. It's all of them.
>>18177196Why didn't they make the Toiletmaster?
>>18177194What's the word that sounds the most like 'shit'?
Just getting back from a nice hike, really cultivating a nice watch tan this season. You have gone outside today right anons?
>>18177195>>Seamaster, Railmaster, Globemaster>All shit.The Seamaster line has been around since 1948 and is older than the Constellation line. Dozens of different models have been released under that name. Some good, some bad.btw I'm surprised we don't see more vintage Omegas in these threads. They're cheap, very reliable and come in a great diversity of designs. Why would anyone buy a Seiko or a Nomos when they can have a nice little Omega?
>>18177208>Why would anyone buy a Seiko or a Nomos when they can have a nice little Omega?Because you can buy a Rolex, an Ebel or a Titus.
>>18177208they're bretty hot ngl
feeling poor...
>>18177221That's ultra beautiful.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oadhHk2xs6c
>>18177208>btw I'm surprised we don't see more vintage Omegas in these threads.They're out there. This general isn't that into vintage, by and large. Neo-vintage, moreso.Picrel. My father's Seamaster 120 that he bought new in 1970. It's all original, never been serviced.
Farter going hard af
>>18177076Are you certaina you want to buy that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-NI4WixVUg
Thought on pocket watches?Pic is my Jean Perret slimline dress pocket watch. They are a great accessory and really put you above the rest in a formal event.
>russian watches
>>18177232retarder turdhauser malodore fatangay
Remember when everyone was buying this rubbish?
Which analog MR-G are you buying? LEFT (2100): - Casioak - $4800 new - 44.5mm width x 13.6m height - No stopwatch or timer, time only. - Has bluetooth (but who cares)RIGHT (B1000) - $2600 new - 46.3mm width x 14.7x height - Has stopwatch, timer, world time.Both are titanium, multiband 6, solarNEITHER - Wait for a new analog model
>>18177238Watch what you're saying, pipsqueak.
>>18177236I always wanted a Strelka and Belka watch but there are so many fakes
>>18177241None because they both suck shit.
>>18177243Yeah same. Russiantards ruined their own market with that.
>>18177239When did they stop?
>>18177247Maybe when they realised they just wasted their money?
>>18177243Are they that expensive that you'd be devastated if it was fake?
can someone id this?
>>18177233They're often more precise, durable and resistant than wrist watches, even when they're 100 years old.
>>18177251I don't want to support Ukranian scammers
Best regatta chronograph for the summer?
>>18177256I don't want to support Ukraine.
>>18177242browwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn
>>18177260Ah, the colour of wood.
Seethe, if you must.
>>18177259Based.
>>18177244I already have a square, I want an analogue with multiband
>>18177265If you insist, then the left one.
Explain.
>>18177261Wish I had millions to live in a house like that.
>>18177268I saw someone say if you boil casio straps they become softer, would that work for this? If they are colored like this does that affect the color?
someone id this please
>>18177270I actually wonder why crown on the left isn't more popular. You can't operate a crown when the watch is on your wrist anyway, even if you could everyone teaches that you shouldn't.
Anyone got wrist shots of the Tuder Black Bay from various angles?
>>18177279Sinn has some like this
>>18177279Most people are right-handed so it makes sense to have the crown on the right
>>18176710dang what is that proud beauty?
>>18176766any tissot over $500
are casio edifice based or cringe? yes i am serious and poor
>>18177294lineage betta
>>18176492 1/10 >>18176499 0/10 >>18176529 2/10 >>18176554 0/10 >>18176629 0/10 >>18176710 3/10 >>18176712 2/10 1/10 >>18176773 0/10 >>18176792 4/10 >>18176840 0/10 >>18176863 0/10 >>18176869 2/10 >>18176921 2/10 >>18176923 1/10 >>18176943 5/10 >>18176948 2/10 >>18176974 0/10 >>18176981 1/10 >>18176990 3/10 >>18177073 0/10 >>18177076 1/10 >>18177097 6/10 >>18177205 1/10 >>18177208 6/10 >>18177215 6/10 >>18177221 1/10 >>18177223 4/10 >>18177225 4/10 >>18177226 2/10 >>18177227 1/10 >>18177230 1/10 >>18177232 4/10 >>18177233 0/10 >>18177236 0/10 >>18177239 2/10 >>18177241 0/10 >>18177242 5/10 >>18177243 0/10 >>18177244 0/10 >>18177246 1/10 >>18177248 1/10 >>18177250 7/10 >>18177253 0/10 >>18177254 0/10 >>18177258 2/10 >>18177263 2/10 >>18177264 0/10 >>18177268 0/10 >>18177270 8/10 >>18177276 5/10 >>18177278 0/10 >>18177282 3/10
>>18177205based seiko & real life enjoyer
>>18177297At least Bittercel is funny in his tantrums about being poor. This is just...weird.
>>18177301cope
>>18177297now post your own watch
>>18177305cope
I don't hate the Reverso, I just don't like it that's all.
>>18176712Wow those are the nicest homos I've ever seen
>>181773061/10
>>18177149shut the fuck up nigger
>>18177311cringe
>>18177311LMFAO
>>18177314aw you found a new word :)
>>18177297what's blud wafflin about dis so lame
>>18176998Sorry CitizenChad; I don't do full collection pics since the last time I did that, a mod banned me for proving someone wrong...lol Incidentally, it's also Koffee time for me too.>>18177049Wear what you love Fren; your accessories don't define you.>>18177070I'd agree with this if I didn't care about watches at all, and I've known people who have this approach. >>18177225Love this model; have been looking to pick one up, but they're all in awful condition or 'restored'. You're lucky to have one all original; keep it, wear it, and make sure the movement is serviced regularly (it's a great movement and should keep excellent time). Wear it in good health Fren; the dial and hands configuration is essentially perfect in proportion.>>18177233Love them, have 2 excellent ones. I wear them with my 3-piece's during certain parts of the year.>>18177254Agreed, and my Zenith has been more accurate than my 0100, after a fresh service and a year of testing, of course.>>18177263Love it!>>18177301Many of his posts were deleted in the last thread....I don't know why, but I had a lot of response origins 'lined' out. I wish him happiness though...and maybe one day he'll get a watch he loves.>>18177309That's okay. I don't love most of them either, but this one to me is the epitome of what it should be. I hate numerals, I hate extra writing, I hate anything that makes the dial unbalanced or that fucks with the symmetry (the numerals are notorious for this if you look at the spacing and weight of the left vs. right). This model was the only one that I could find that satisfied my requirements, aside from actually going vintage. It's also the only model of any modern house that I think did the correct version of 'faux-tina'. It's subtle, and astonishingly beautiful (it's like ivory colour).
>>18177322FUCK OFF FAG
>>18177287Not the point at all. Of the crown is on the left crown bump isn't an issue.
>>18177322>dress watch>lume>as big as a SpeedmasterFucking hell, JLC is such a joke
>>18177322>I don't love most of them either, but this one to me is the epitome of what it should be.Funny. For me, picrel is what a Reverso is. I think it's probably comes down to age. Silver guilloche dial with numerals has been the classic Reverso as long as I've been alive, but I'm sure for older collectors, that's not the case.Like how some other anon was talking about Cartier watches being recognized by different age groups.
>>18177328>dress watchWell, actually, the Reverso is the original sports watch.
>>18176529Black mold lung infection watch
>>18177335Retard.
>>18177341Clinically retarded if you don't know that.T. NTA
>>18177324Join the discussion Fren; what watch are you wearing today? >>18177328It's not a 'dress watch', though I think today people use it as one. It's a sports watch, made for polo players...just the way it was meant to be.>>18177331An interesting and absolutely correct assessment. What I love about yours is the small second's subdial, which correctly preserves the golden ratio that is throughout the rest of the dial; if I wanted a Reverso with small seconds, yours would be very high up on the list. The numerals, sadly, still make me a little concerned; the 10 and 11 make the upper left quadrant very 'heavy' as opposed to the upper right quadrant, which looks almost empty or weightless by comparison. This cannot be avoided with JLC numerals, as they are designed to be consistent with Art Deco and are definitely correct in terms of comprehensive design. So, it's a tradeoff for me; if I want the full numerals, I'd have to accept the weight differential. One of the reasons I always prefer them with the hour plots.Is yours running well? It looks like you're wearing it a lot and enjoying it; that's what these watches deserve. Given that mine is freshly delivered, I may send it into JLC soon for a service, as I have no idea of the service history of this one. The owner obviously took care of it, but beyond that I have no idea if it was worn hard. >>18177335Exactly. The great thing about this design is that it is an honest homage to the first one.>>18177341>>18177344He may not have known; it's not like the Reverso is particularly famous outside of watch circles.
>>18177362>Is yours running well?Good as anything. +0.75spd avg.
>>18177331sovl>>18177362soulless
Will anyone ever make something as nice as this?
>>18177362Are you going to get the back engraved?There was a poster here who had a question mark engraved on the back of his so he could answer "I don't know" when someone asked him the time.
>>18177322Hi Frank, why don't you post your pocket watches here? Would be nice to see them, especially the movements if you have any pics.
>>18177376Nivada will start producing 34-36mm vintage style watches and never make a 40mm sports watch
>>18177376That's like half the JLC catalog.
>>18176633The last time I set it was about two months ago. Still going steady.
>>18177381Nah JLC has very similar designs but something is always off about them. >>18177380Never heard of them
>>18177384Then buy the Omega. They can't possibly cost that much.
>>18177385Omega doesn't make stuff like that anymore...
>>18176728Seethe
>>18177387Buy used. Even cheaper.
>>18177389It's so bad it becomes good territory here.
>>18177362"The Reverso is ackchyually the first sports watch" is the most midwit take of the watch community. Unironically nobody ever said that before s0ÿ YouTubers like Adrian Barker and that ugly bong from Watchfinder started to push this dumb meme.The Reverso is a traditional 1930s watch with 0 shock resistance, mounted on a frame. I can assure nobody ever wore a Reverso while playing polo, and honestly you'd have to be a complete moron to believe this. The movement would break the second a player would swing the hammer.It was a luxury "Art Deco" item marketed from the start, and the whole point of that gimmick was to have it engraved. "Sports watches" is a post-WW2 thing. Before that, people simply took off their watches.
>>18177398>NNNooooooo! The polo players flooped them!!!
cool sideprofile, finncel
>>18177402Oh sweet, a new bittercel just dropped
>>18177362>>18177331While the Reverso is the reddit's choice, the black dial one with batons definitely edges ahead. The Arabic numerals one is just too common and pure urban class Reddit.
recelso
>>18177374That's awesome, man! I hope mine can run as well as that. Wear it in good health!>>18177375From a certain point of view...I think JLCAnon's watch has soul for sure, but I do think mine has soul as well. What are you wearing today, Fren?>>18177378I'm undecided on that. In the same way that I would never get a tattoo because I can't decide on a design that I'd love '4 life', getting a watch 'branded' has always bothered me. We'll see after I send it in for servicing, as I could ask them to do it at that time if I so chose.>>18177379Who is Frank? Also, I've posted them many times before. Are you new here? What watch are you wearing today, Fren?>>18177398I haven't read anything to contradict the origin story from JLC, so I'll accept it until something more documented comes up. Your assurances however are not comforting:>I can assure...I have a colleague who plays polo rather regularly, and he bought a simple reverso decades ago for the purpose. He doesn't wear it on his mallet wrist; no one would. Last time I saw it, the 'reverso' side was admittedly scratched to hell, but the dial side was nice and clean. >>18177412I like them both; they each serve different purposes though, and cater to different aesthetic preferences.
>>18177414Is OmegaDrunk the new Reversocel?
>>18177415The shape reminds me of a Casio I saw one time. It can't be turned around the hide the time. I don't know why you'd want to do that. Do you do rock climbing or something?
>>18177417Literally who? Why is everyone here so invested in on some stupid drama instead of actual discussion?
>>18177419discord raiding again
true, true, omega peaked 30 years ago
>>18177428My wife wears the same watch.
>>18177431beautiful! your wife is lucky!
>>18176554I have considered the Nausicaa Seiko.
>>18177438There's got to be a more effective/inexpensive way of telling women you don't ever intend to have sex.
>>18177438I have considered her butt
>>18177438I would have bought it if it were a reasonable size instead of 40mm like all their crossover watches
>>18177233they're nice for variety
yes i bought the casio mr-g square for $4000. no i will not post a picture
>>18177459Why is it like that?
>>18177466Garmin Insinct 2S sadly, but i'm currently waiting on a watch to be delivered
>>18177417I don't know if I'm allowed in that exclusive club, Fren. What watch are you wearing this eve?>how come no one posts their watch except ReversoChad?>>18177418Yes, and Citizen also makes one. I almost got one, just to see what rectangular watches look like on my wrist daily. I gave up on the idea though...because if I ended up getting the Reverso in the future, I'd have a placeholder waste-watch that I'd never wear again. >>18177419I don't know, Fren. I'm just happy to share with you all my newest and 'last' watch. >>18177428The more I think about it, the more I agree with you on this. So many models from the 90s-00s era are fantastic...and so many today are...well, unremarkable (in terms of aesthetic design, not movement design). Yours is a classic; is it running well?
>>18177466Obvious false flag operation
>>18177473How?
>>181774665610
>>18177474Assassination attempt just happens to nick his ear but nothing else, allowing him an awesome photo op. Shooter is neutralized. Look at real assassination attempts and they're always shambolic. Like, the footage of Hinckley trying to shoot Reagan.
>>18177459no idea. the semi-spherical glass elements look a bit interesting irl.>>18177466gshitter
>>18177496meant for >>18177468
I should have gotten this watch a long time ago. That is all. Hope you are all having a great evening! The drink is on, and the celebration begins!
>>18177438This Violet Evergarden looks even better
>>18177512
>>18177470it runs well! I had it serviced last December.
>>18177297stfu faggot
>>18177514Glad to hear man; wear it in good health!!
>>18177480How do you distinguish a real assassination attempt?
Drunken thought: Did you guys know that the Reverso sapphire crystal is curved from side to side but not top to bottom? Fucking awesome....
>mogs all your watches by setting itself and being zaratsu polished
>>18177565No need to set itself...
asking big-C if I should feel embarrassed to wear the mr-g on a work trip
>>18177575It depends on what kind of work you do.
>>18177575What in the fuck is big c?
>>18177583Claude (AI)
is there a list of casio watches with bracelet with not folded links like Edifice EFR-552D
>>18177581>needs nasa meme to justify his useless antique
>>18177466f 91 :^)
>>18177592I think speedy would be a good watch even if it never went to the moon
>>18176863Wrist size? Those are nice watches
NEO VINTAGE
>>18177596>gets mogged by $100 casio in looks and functionthe above only shows moonwatch and the like are nothing more than a special needs badge
>>18177602well casio mogs everything. when you buy mechanical you are saying "Yes I will be worse than casio but I get cool little gears which make up for it maybe." Nothing unique to omega
>>18177236>painted by hand by a blond womansoulv
>>18176974>so stealth u can't even see what time it is
>>18177602And yet....your heart desires something better than a Casio.
>>18177311fucking kek
>>18177362>the 10 and 11 make the upper left quadrant very 'heavy' as opposed to the upper right quadrant, which looks almost empty or weightless by comparisonautism
>>18177608>being blindlollmao even
>>18177621Wisdom.
>>18177376You will get tired of a watch like that after a couple months. Very soulless.>>18177398This anon is correct. He also posted a decent example of a Reverso, unlike the two other ugly-as-fuck designs that were postes in this thread. Not that I'd expect taste from someone who enjoys the Speedmaster, btw.
>>18177575>all that blah blah blah to help a retardAmericans are fascinating creatures>>18177419This.
>>18177624I haven't seen you in a few hours! What watch are you wearing tonight, Fren?>>18177626Because. What watch are you wearing tonight, Anon?
>>18177601Based as fuck
>>18177627Do me a favour. Closely look at pic related. If you genuinely think the Shitmaster looks better than this, you are beyond retarded.
>>18177631>unrefined case design>cut-off numeralsSorry, Fren...it's not for me. The handset is beautiful and elegant though...
>>18177632Ah, you do be retarded then! Love to know, makes me feel better.The case is like that because it's a vintage piece. The cut-off numerals have always been a refined touch of style, at least for non-autistic people. Rolex also employed them a lot, and I will post examples if you so need.>historically cucked by Bulova>retarded and useless tachymetric bezel>subdials too close to each other>too many unnecessary lines>horrible hour markers instead of numbers>boring handsEnjoy ur shitter lol
>>18177638>Enjoy ur shitterCheers, BritAnon! It's still my favorite design ever! What are you wearing this morning?
>>18177644Very anti-climatic.
>>18177644You have atrocious taste and a vast ignorance of 1940s-1960s horological design. Sad!
>>18177325But it explains why the crown is on the right. You hold the watch with your left hand and operate the crown with your right hand. It’s the most natural configuration for operating the crown for right-handed people, which most people are
What's a non faggy dress watch?
Hello niggers,Should I buy this watch?
>>18177650Twisting a crown isn't dextrous work. You spend 99.9999 percent of your time with a watch wearing it, you can spend the rest of the 0.00001 of the time winding with your left fingers if it means wearing a more comfortable watch.
>>18177683Most people have no issue with wearing a watch with the crown on the right and will prefer to operate the crown, a relatively small and delicate object, with their dominant hand. It’s perfectly sensible most watches have the crown on the right side. If you dislike it, buy one with the crown on the left or at 4 or 5 o’clock, I think those can be found too
>Rolex has a hairline scratch under the glass within a week of coming out servicingIt's got warranty but I feel too beta to go in that quick after getting it back
>>18177687Post a pic, faggot
Kofe time.
>>18177702
>>18177681yes
>>18177686You're relatively gay.
What are the best websites to buy watches, other than chrono24?
>>18177739Theo&Harris.com
>>18177737Nah it’ just that the subject, preference in crown placement, is a bit gay.
>>18177740Look, am I saying it's the best watch store? No, I'm not saying that, but what I am saying is that they have a meticulously curated collection that's always changing, there's always something new to see there, ya know? And they have the best selection of exotic straps that there is. Period end.
>>18176633I want to buy a 2254 that's available in my local watch market thing.How careful do I have to be about fakes? I remember seeing, about over a decade ago, that there were in-fact fake 2254's. Externally it seems fine, box+papers etc.Should I still meet the guy and pay the 27USD equivalent to let a watchmaker open it up and make sure it's a legit cal.1120?
>>18177747You prefer dick placed inside your ass rather than outside.
>>18177752Okay "Theo", sorry I forgot your real name.
>>18177438Reminder that throughout this entire film she's not wearing any pants.
>>18177755>talks about dicks in a watch threadAnon you know what the conclusion is
How versatile is a Diver? Can it be worn in a dressy or more minimalistic outfit? What about something like with Sprezzatura or Ivy/Prep/Dark academia?
Anyone here have experience with Redwood watches? How are they?
>>18177766>Can it be worn in a dressy or more minimalistic outfit?Dressy, yes; minimalistic, not really.>Ivy/Prep/Dark academiaStop ingurgitating memes.
>>18177599never measured it but I don't have a large wrist
>>18177766The Italians and the French have been wearing divers with tailoring since the 1950s. Obviously it depends of the outfit, the watch and the man.
>>18177768They look good but customers say they're too loud with the ticking, and in general they feel cheap, which is not a good thing.
>>18177779So that's a no then.
>>18177638>The cut-off numerals have always been a refined touch of styleLOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>>18177781You're right, your Seiko is a perfect match for your cargo shorts
>>18177789
>>18177790
>>18177783Dumb retard.
>no rolex
>>18177818That pic is like a renaissance painting.Also nice "larp" from the glowie, very appropriate.
>>18177681Well I just bought it wish me luck bros
>>18177826Go fuck yourself.
>>18177830bitta
>>18177830lolno
>>18177823>That pic is like a renaissance paintingTrue, but the correct term is Baroque. Caravaggio would paint something like that, not Raffaello.
>>18177826>buying serious watch>posting anime retardationkill yourself
>>18177835>ahckhuallee
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T MAKE A NEW THREAD WHEN THIS ONE IS STILL ON PAGE 1Well, I just did.COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE>>18177838>>18177838>>18177838>>18177838>>18177838
>>18177835More like MAGAvaggio
>>18177818where is this chud diving in that suit
>>18177848I'd bet you he probably swims as part of his fitness routine. Not that that's why he's wearing a dive watch necessarily, but still.
>>18177776I'm just trying to describe that general 'classical' style, whatever the correct term for it may beraypt
>>18177779Nice
>>18177305>>18177306 has an apple watch
>>18177241I hate the mr-g casioak. I like the original one but the mr-g model has an annoying second hand that ticks once a second and has less functionality than the original. I would rather buy a decent mechanical watch for the same price. The one on the right is ugly as sin so I would not buy that either.
>>18177769w2c
>>18177777checked
>>18177205Is that the SPB121?
