After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.Also that a narrow grip+arched back are really good, this instantly added a few reps.And that if you're not growing or getting stronger then you need to do more volume. There's different ways of putting on volume, but my favorite are partials, from the bottom to the middle.When I started doing these my pull up numbers sky rocketed, from multiple sets of 8 to multiple of 15 (chin over bar ofc). My back also grew a lot.
>>74225061THE ANSWER IS 1
>>74225069Why?6/2=3(1+2)=3then you multiply those two and you get 9
>>742250616 / 2(1+2) = x6 / 2(3) = x6 / 6 = x1 = x
dayum I forgot you're supposed to solve only the parenthesis first
>>74225080PEMDAS you moron, the P is parenthesis, meaning you solve that first. I made It through HS with strait D-'s in math and I knew that.
>>74225084You wouldn't do the multiplication before you do the division. Learn your orders of operation.GN0W
>>74225080you do brackets first dumbass>>74225104BEDMAS master race
>>74225104you're seething I dont care about your gay little hobby? lol
>>74225108Go take 5th grade math again.
6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 ) = x6 / 2 + 4 = x6 / 6 = xx= 0
>>74225131>I'm a smart boy because I memorized how to make useless calculations
>>74225146>I'm a smart boy because I memorized how to make useless calculationsyes >:^)
>>74225139nice
>>74225153It's nothing worth praise to remember what's solved first. While you memorized your fag formulas I was partying fucking and being fucked
>>74225061The equation isn't written correctly. It mixes algebraic and arithmetic notation. The only way to win is to not play.
>>74225168
>>74225139finally someone with a brain
>>74225131Fifth grade math will yell you that the precedence is the same for both multiplication and division, so they're done in the order they appear.After summing the parentheses, you do the division and then the multiplication to get 9.If you think otherwise, you're wrong.
>>74225131I learned this in first grade ap mathThat and negative numbers
>>74225183You take pride in remembering which part of an equation's solved first, I take pride in having sex...PECULIAR!
>>742251876/3*3 = 9???
>>74225104The parenthesis does not extend to the numbers outside of it. You do not distribute first if it is out of order. It's 9. You can verify it if you want using a scientific calculator.
I don't know man, I just like to lift heavy things
>>742252176/2(1+2)6/2(3)3(3)9
>>74225104You moron, you only solve the part of the equation inside the parenthesis first.
>>74225222>You can verify it if you want using a scientific calculator.I forgot tried that yesterday, it gives 9What's pemdas anyway
>>74225104I can see why you made a D minus in math.
>>74225178It doesn't matter. As it's written, it is 9. If it was 6 over 2(1+2), then it would be 1
It has two answers.If you follow PEMDAS by the letter, the answer is 1.6 / 2(1+2) = x6 / 2(3) = x6 / 6 = x1 = xBut PEMDAS is just a nuemonic, not an actual rule of math. It is generally considered that multiplication and division have the same precedence, in which case you perform the equally precedented operations left to right.6 / 2(1+2) = x6 / 2 * 3 = x3 * 3 = x9 = xHowever, if you want to be a real mathlete, you know that the answer is undefined, because the question is incorrectly written. Because multiplication and division have equal precedence, for the equation to be "correct" it needs an additional set of parentheses to clarify the order of operations defined.Either:(6 / 2)(1+2)Or:6 / (2(1+2))Being proud you can answer an incorrectly defined question is like being proud you can read a sentence like: "Hey, a because stamp waffle dimsum ran tomorrow". Just because you think you know what it means doesn't mean you're "right".
>>74225260t. mathlette
>>74225252PEMDAS is just a very basic rule of algebra, which, qlong woth every other rule of algebra and trig, caries over into calculus.
>>74225260As it's written, it's nonsense. Written in algebraic notation, it's 1.
>>74225278This is the correct answer.
>>74225293We get it, you're retarded.
https://youtu.be/URcUvFIUIhQ?si=VOkoOSBYbG2zSmM2
>>74225061Simple, really. 1 + 2 is 3, multiply 3 by 2, divide 6 by 6.The answer is 0.
>>74225321We get it, you tapped out of school in third grade.
>>74225374a number divided by itself is always 1 btw
>>74225392Show me the rule of math! As >>74225278 said, that's just a Pneumatic.
>>74225396You both spelled it wrong, it's "mnemonic". And as above poster noted, it's just a short-hand to do arithmetic that breaks down once students get into real math.
>>74225489Whatever, Hylic.
>>74225392Not zero>>74225061This fools people by intentionally being ambiguous. Literal interpretation per order of operations is equivalent to (6÷2)*(1+2)=9, however the way it's grouped leads people to believe they're looking at 6÷(2(1+2))=1. Representation as a fraction is superior, but they didn't do that because they want people who don't understand the interchangeable nature of multiplication and division to take pemdas literally as multiplication preceding division
>>74225396No its not, try doing a division by hand, 33|____3 10How is it going to be 0?
>>74225525>Not zeroWhat do you mean?
>>74225084>>74225104>>74225139>>74225260>>74225374You just outed yourself as a boomer, we don't use this method since 1917.
>>74225540Boomers weren’t even alive back then, retard
>>74225061This can be rewritten as > 6 / 2 * (1+ 2)To evaluate, follow PEMDAS> 6 / 2 * (3)> (3) * (3) > 9But it is a bit ambiguous since it uses the classic division sign, rather than the fractional sign (which is generally clearer to use, since the means of writing dictates whether a group is evaluated as being parenthetical or not). If signage is unclear, it must be assumed that the entities are separate; hence, 9 is the answer. If it was written as either (6/2)(1+2) it would be 9 still, whereas writing it as 6 / (2*(1+2)) would evaluate to 1. It can't be assumed to be that case unless it's written with 6 as a numerator and 2(1+2) as a denominator.
>>74225061The equation is poorly phrased.You should really put brackets around everything.(6)÷(2)×((1)+(2))Now it's easy.
>>74225178Insightful poster.>>74225260This is the way.
>>74225278Big brain. Also, mnemonic, not "neumonic".>t. grammar nerd
>>74225494
>>74225489Wait until you get into hyper and hypo operations. That was fun to dabble in during middle and high school. Explaining how logic from one operator carries into the next, and how the order of operations is derived from that, can be quite entertaining when your audience is capable of thinking at least a step ahead. It's frustrating with retards like these.
>>74225540>we don't use this method since 1917The retardation of America at its finest
>>742255370/0 is ambiguous and only defined in the limit of some functions. That's because dividing by zero is in general not compatible with standard arithmetic.For what I mean about the limit, go to wolframalpha and plot sin(x)/x. At x=0, you get 0/0, but this evaluates to 1 in the limit in this case. However, cos(x)/x gives -infinity from the left and infinity from the right, so it's undefined.
>>74225061I very nearly have a masters degree in chem. engineering and I have suffered through a lot of math and physics.Nobody fucking writes things out like that. I have no idea what the order of operations are and have made it this far.I read it as 6 / 6 = 1. If that's wrong then fuck the person writing the question for using sloppy notation, stop complicating simple things in the future.
Infinity doesn't exist and anyone who says otherwise is a cum huffing retard.
>>74225593>It's always the ((((((((2)))))))))'s
>>74225690I already have advanced degrees in Physics and Math and I will now be writing things out this way on a permanent basis to increase suffering for my Chem E students.
>>74225694Infinity definitely does not exist in reality, which makes it all the cooler. The human imagination can exceed the bounds of the universe. Also, how does one huff cum? Do you want in the aroma or actually inhale the liquid? For what purpose???
>>74225726>>74225694Infinity doesn't exist in the same way that a true hexagon doesn't exist. It's hair splitting between reality and platonic ideals. Infinity exists in a "close-enough" sense of the word which is pretty much how human beings operate anyway
>>74225714I will plant chemicals that simultaneously smell like rotting fish and faeces in the ventilator shaft in your office.Will your colleagues be able to tell the difference given your usual body odour?
>>74225779>Colleagues I am without peer.
>>74225080>Why?because it's an approximation of math, and the rules of the approximation are unknown. You can find different physical calculators that apply different rules for different answers. The response to this challenge should bea. "rewrite it in standard math notation, and I'll solve that"b. "rewrite it in some specific programming language, and I'll solve that"c. treat it like a quadratic equation and provide two answers>>74225061what I find frustrating about getting to doing pullups, is that the easier variations don't prepare you much for the harder variations.I think I wasted my time not just going with assisted pullups.
>>742256860/0 lacks dimension. Numerical values have one dimension. The function that produces 0/0 has to be evaluated in context to have any meaning.
>>74225061I disagree about ROM. No need for a pause, but you must fully stretch and control the eccentric. Volume is king for progress, setting total rep goals really helped with that. Trying to 3x5 and add weight sucked. Banging out ever more pull-ups per session worked.
>>74225222>The parenthesis does not extend to the numbers outside of itLiterally every math teacher of mine in middle school and high school had us multiply what was in the parentheses with what was next to/outside of them.
>>74225779>Engineering student>Ready to make everything smell like shitCalm down there, pajeet, my office already reeks of your mom's vagene
>>74225069fpbp.
>>74225872Not incorrect, but the statement "any number divided by itself" is false unless zero is not considered a number.
>>74225920Pajeets are mostly into computer science 'engineering'>>74225849Good one, now quantify these nuts on your face.No weight classes in the jungle (physics department)
>>74226027It's not.Zero wasn't invented until the Indians domesticated elephants.
>>74226027Zero has no value, it is a placeholder digit. The dimension of a value is dependent on its distance relative to zero. Zero as it is symbolically represented is fictitious; its true value is as a comparative reference for true values. Read Godel's proof of 1+1 and you'll see what I mean.
>>74225906>Literally every math teacher of mine in middle school and high school had us multiply what was in the parentheses with what was next to/outside of them.education must be real shit where you live...a(b+c) is the same as a * (b+c), yes, but that doesn't mean that multiplication notation doesn't imply any particular priority difference from other multiplicationsand anyway dividing by N is exactly equal to multiplying by 1/N, so 6/2(1+2) is exactly the same as 6 * 1/2 * (1+2)and is therefore very much:- equal to 9 and nothing else- not ambiguous whatsoeverno matter how much this displeases un/mal-educated morons on the internet
you are all unfathomably retarded I rest my case with picrel fuck all of you I hope you all die a slow painful death
>>74225139>6/6 = 0kek,I have 6 sweets and i have 6 children, grandpa is a lucky nonce, each kid gets 1 sweet you dope
>>74225061pemdas=1bedmas=9I hate math so much it's unreal engine 4
>>74226880you are interpreting the horizontal division the same way I'd prefer to, but it's an interpretation and the expression is so ambiguous that calculators implement it differently. Division and multiplication operators have the same precedence. 2(1+2) is just 2*(1+2). So you have N mulop N mulop N. Without some extra rule, and math doesn't provide it because normal math notation uses two dimensions as in your picture, there's no reason to parse it further as (N mulop N) mulop N, vs. N mulop (N mulop N).6 % 2 * (1+2)6 * 1/2 * 33 * 39
>>74226880This is why math is stupid, the notation is so subjective and most teachers were C+ students themselves and don't understand how to write questions and piss themselves when confronted.Was taught that the division symbol was synonymous with "over" and then you move up a grade or into college you're told the exact opposite.The answer I came up with was 1 as well.
>>74226880Incredible self own.Order of operations:Everything in parenthesisAll Multiplication and division left to right.
>>74225061it’s either 1 or 9i don’t give a shit which one
>>74225278>you know that the answer is undefinedFinally man. These questions are always so lame and played out.
>>742268806 divided by 2 multiplied by 3, now that requires a very big brain!
>>74225104Yes and is still 9.
>>74225278was gonna post this but you did it better, cheers
>>74225278>Because multiplication and division have equal precedenceCan't you just start from the left???
>>74225278>It is generally considered that multiplication and division have the same precedenceit is not "generally considered", it is a hard rulebecause they are the exact same operationa/b is the same as a * (1/b)>if you want to be a real mathlete, you know that the answer is undefined, because the question is incorrectly writtenyou should have stopped just before spouting this nonsense. it is very much well-defined for the reason above.>>74227409>This is why math is stupid, the notation is so subjective and most teachers were C+ students themselvesno, your teachers just sucked ass, which is not the case in all countries, thankfullyit is unambiguously 9, see >>74226506 and >>74227209
It's 5.
>>74228537(You)
>>74225584Fucking idiot
>>74225061I hate these dumbfuck posts. The only reason that people have different answers is because they re-wrote the math interpretations we've been using for fuckin' centuries so black kids wouldn't feel stupid.
>>74225168>being fucked
>>74225069This. Unless everything ive ever been taught is wrong, the answer for me will always be 1
>>74226352>>74226324You're being really careful to avoid saying "zero is not a number" because you recognize that's a tough sell.
>>74227922Bc multiplication and division have equal importance. It's also the same with addition and subtraction. So you go from left to right just bc okay?
>>74225139>1+2>4 Are you retarded
>6÷2(1+2)>6÷2(3)>6÷6>1Are you all retarded? Is this American education in action?
>>74229208Your mom's a tough sell.
>>74229328Yeah pretty much.
>>74225080>>74225139>>74225217>>74225239>>74225374>>74225527>>74225584>>74227209>>74226934>>74228416>>74228551I sincerely hope you guys are just trolling
>>74225278
You spastics all posting in a troll thread.
>>74225139Thank u anon i laughed
>>74225061(6(1 + 2))/2This is how you solve it, never post this image again, you've been warned.
>>74225537>explainHow many times can you put 6 into itself? You can do it 1 time. Welcome to class, lunch is at 11.
I hate PENISDAS so much. I have no idea what it stands for. It's such a stupid way to remember anything. I fucking hate when people try to teach things with some abbreviation or some catchy phrase.What the FUCK does PEMDAS stand for?Just solve the parentheses first. That's it. That's the entire trick with these math problems.
>>74229890ParenthesesEvolution Mind-blowingDickAssSucking.Pemdas
It’s interesting reading this thread. I haven’t done “math” in 25 years. What I learnt in school were 2x1 and 2x2 to remove the brackets and then having 6 / 6 left.
>>74229905Correct good sir! Seems the schools don't teach basic math anymore
The answer is obviously 9 what are y'all on about?
9
>>74225131Dude it’s not literally PEMDAS in direct order it has pairs. It’s P.E.(M/D).(A/S).
>>74225061Well huh... if it works well for you, to each his own I guess. But you're contradicting so many years of experienced trainers/coaches and the science (physics, anatomy, etc) instead of going the intelligent way: research on the internet or read books or acquire from whatever source (as long as it's actually good and reliable) actual, proven knowledge and applying it to your program.For me I simply did (taken from the most basic common sense) literally only chin-ups and push-ups (executed right, especially the latter) in a scheme of 3xF and after a while 5xF. I never added on bw squats and some effective exercise for abs because of laziness. And I also stopped it all anyway because I want to desperately go back to a black iron gym or a powerlifting gym and run SS again.I miss weights so bad. Sure SS makes you suffer like a motherfucker but it's needless to say it's worth the huge results. Problem is lack of money for gym and food and supplements... and the fact that I don't even really enjoy eating...Oh and by the way the answer to that image is 9, or in case you have to apply distributive property or some shit it would be 1. I despise math as much as eating.
>>74225061wypepo are retards and illetrate. this site is a case study and a reason why they need outsiders to baby sit them. Brainstorming over some kindergarten problem, clown nation.
>>74227922>>74226880This is why everyone is confused because of the division sign. We use fractions for a reason.Now stop replying you fucking brainlet niggers.
>>74225061>stumped the internet Only stumped retards who don't understand that a(b + c) = a * (b + c)
The old classic americans vs rest of the world issue.
Math is such a good brainlet filterIt may not serve a purpose in real life but it's great in university because it makes retards fail and go do a trade
>>74225069To do 6 divided by 2(1+2), solve parentheses first using distributive property. It would be 6 divided by 2 divided by 4. The answer is 3/4, stupid DYEL brainlets. Maybe hit the books and hit some weights.
>>74231196>t. primary schoolerab = (a*b)Otherwise, 1N / 10N/kg = 0.1N2/kg, for example.Thus 6/2(1+2)=1And yes, writing a unit behind something is just multiplying it with that unit, or more precisely, that unit vector.
>>74225104ExactlyParenthesisExponentsDivisionThen MultiplicationSo you do the bit in brackets, then do the division after. That leaves you with 3x3
>>74231234>>74231746>americans>amerishart lardbrain proves point
I hate math so much its unreal
>>74225690Exactly this. It's also using keyboard notation which tends to use proximity to indicate grouped denominators>6 ÷ 2 x 3 Which has to go in standard order>6 ÷ 2(3)Which implies 2(3) is the denominator The point is to be ambiguous, strip context, then flip expectations so it can call everyone wrong and stupid, and reddit brained pedants can strut around and puff out their spoon chests.
>>74226880Mathlette doesn't understand basic math
>>74225069Correct. >>74225080This nigga doesn't even PEMDAS! SAD!>>74225061Yes op, full range of motion is what is natural and comfortable. Pushing yourself to the absolute limit of what your limbs can extend to is how you hurt yourself and anyone who disagrees is too new to have an opinion anyway.
>>74225108>P(arenthesis)>E(xponents)>M(ultiply)>D(ivision)>A(dd)>S(ubtraction)You're wrong, simple as.
>>74225061Why not do them with perfect form until you can't get another one with good form and only then add a few more with questionable form?
>>74225061Serious answer:It's 1, because you assume that the 2 is the coefficient for (1+2), thus you would calculate those first before dividing that result by 6. This is normal in algebraic calculationsOtherwise it is clearly 9. Another way to think about this is to replace the dividing by 2, with multiplying by 0.5.So you have 6 * 0.5 * 3, which is just 9, no matter how you go about it.
>>74225061It's 9
