Bulking doesn’t work for natties, it’s roids or bust
>>74591396>t. poorfag
>>74591436Prove it wrong (pro tip you can’t)
>>74591463This is what people lacking in intelligence say after asserting a claim without providing evidence themselves.
>>74591463Cico disproves your entire mindset.The dyel mind cannot comprehend eating more, and lifting heavier
>>74592856>you need SAND to build a sandcastle retard, you can’t just BUILD it out of nothing Ok I’ll just use the amount of sand I need and that’s that >NOOO you need to lump it on there in large chunks and then shave it down!!No one has ever adequately explained why it has to be this way
>>74591396Don't give up.
>>74591463burden of proof lies on the one making the claimI've offered a rebuttal, you've offered no support for your own pointback to >>>/b/ if you want to troll, 2/10 bait
>>74592990well if bulking your way isn't working, and this works for everyone else on the planet......
>>74591396Post body
>>74594148Tubbies and Skellies HATE This ONE Simple Trick!
>>74594131Who said it doesn’t work?
>>74594274>Bulking doesn’t workin the OP you illiterate nigger
>>74594295>illiterate niggerI’ll will show you the irony of your postOP:>bulking doesn’t work at allMe:>true, bulking is a wasted effort. recomp insteadanon:>bulking (recomping) doesn’t work, bulking worksMe:>who says recomping doesn’t workRetard:Duhh the OP said it
>>74594356Not him but bulking and cutting IS recomp
>>74591396yeah it does>fucking annihilated
>>74591463you made the thread retard
>>74594442I actually didn’t mean the fat burning part of recomping. Just eating the amount you need to live and repair your muscles, can’t call that bulking though
Why is the 'cord trying to push this meme all the sudden?
>>745943564/10 bait
>>74594510You can because you can't predict post exercise metabolic activity with any kind of accuracy so your only real option is cover that unknown with a large enough surplus that it's not a deficit. And that assumes you at least have an accurate interpretation of how much growth can occur which is also not a constant. If you were in a lab where they could track every step and moment of fidgeting and every gram of your food was prepared for you. Maybe we could get it down -/+ 50 but you'd still have err on the plus side to actually have it do what you want. I don't think labeling and individual logging practices are up to the task with any reliability.
>>74591396Then why do all the football jocks have more muscle than you Stupid bitch
>>74594574>recipe calls for 1 egg>put in two just in case>in case of what? The recipe only needs one>yeah but you don’t really know if it will bind correctly with one, might as well put the extra
>>74594641>he doesn't know how large the egg is>he doesn't weigh/sift or level the flour >he doesn't know the temp of the oven>he doesn't have a timerThis food analogy falls flat because if you're half an egg short the cake wouldn't bake at all.
>>74594667Yeah I did it for your benefit. Your point is eating the right amount is basically bulking else because you can’t do it accurately enough. Even if that were true and you couldn’t, in theory they work differently
>>74594745No you did it to try to confuse the issue or obscure your reasoning with a more simplistic system you understand better.The reason why you don't see maingaining outside of advanced lifters who are ped heads is because they're the only ones with body that's composition and hormone profile that is constant enough to cut it that close (because they have assistance). In natrual lifters there is too many unknowns and inconsistencies to do that reliably.
>>74591463>Make baseless claim to cope with life choices>Put burden of proof on the accusedLooks like somebody forgot to work the most important muscle group: the brain
>>74594801No I was just baiting for a >food analogy reply. Your argument is “yes it works BUT…”, so you already agree.
>>74594906I said it can in some really tight hypothetical and controlled setting. That doesn't mean you'll be able to replicate it in reality with the kind of reliability and consistency on a long enough time line you need to see growth in the world we live in.
>>74594099>>74591396 What's the deal with the Demirurge?
