>Higher TDP>boosted clocks>shills claims exaggerated performance gainsOH NO NO NO NOAMD gone full intel aviv, expect stability issues, house fires and fast degrading chips.There's 78-86% chance of previous gen ending up being better.
Wtf are you talking about retard?
>>100163922He's talking about how 5800x3d chads can't stop winning.
>>100163922customers want lower performance and AMD is refusing to fulfill their desire
>>100162902>higher TDPNo, exact same as Zen4 parts. Max TDP/PPT limits are a function of the socket and its power delivery specifications.
>>100164323consoomers are retarded, you need to improve efficiency every gen if you want better performance at the same power draw
>>100163922boosted clocks mean higher power draw and worse efficiency. this will result in other problems like more heat, more noise, likely faster degrading chips due to the heat. understand now idiot?
>>100164323>Let me, a normie who cannot into computer, tell other people how much computing power they need.I hate these click bait "journalists".
>>100165504>more noiseJust set your fan curves to max out at a lower rpm.CPU will throttle accordingly, which is what you want.>degrading chipsThat's not even an issue in the real world.>oh noes this chip I will replace in 5 years time will only last 50 years instead of 100.
>>100164323if everyone cared about performance they would have threadrippers or xeons in their pc's. people want efficiency because that's sustainable, efficient and thus more consumer friendly.the issue here is manufacturers forget about the efficiency part and boost full power to top the charts which isn't sustainable or efficient
>>100162902Seems using mobile-first nodes for high-TDP/high-clocks applications has had its day.So, what's next? AMD has no fabs, GF ditched their sub-10nm nodes ages ago and there simply ain't no other players>inb4 TRUST PAT AND WAIT TWO MORE WEEKS
>>100165623If everyone cared about performace that guy who developed JS as a prank would have been [REDACTED] ages ago and only allowed languages in web dev would be Assembly and C if absolutely necessary.
>>100165611>CPU will throttle>which is what you wantthrottling the cpu is something you DONT want.>That's not even an issue in the real world.intel proved this wrong with their fast degrading chips
>>100162902Safe and effective
>>100165692this, bloated software demands ever more performant hardware to mask its deficiencies, which lets programmers get even more complacent thus leading to even more bloated software and so on.we're past the point of single core/dual-cores, which in an ideal world (without vidya) is all you ever need, and we cant return to that without getting rid of the entire modern webdev stack and bloatmaxxing.
>>100165696>CPU limited to 5Ghz good>CPU throttling to 5Ghz bad
>>100164323>customers>some article writer who probably just used ChatGPT to write the article
>>100165778>CPU limited to 5Ghz good>CPU throttling to 5Ghz badyes, thats efficiency
>>100165623Most of the time your CPU isn't running at high boost and so isn't running at high power draw.
>>100165772You can almost feel the irony breathing at your neck when it's the end users who should have HPC clusters and 400G Ethernet just to browse Internet and not fuckhuge datacenters where everything is optimized down to tiniest detal.
