[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 204839.png (526 KB, 1222x1085)
526 KB
526 KB PNG
Do audiophiles really think they need more than this?
>>
File: ishygddt2.png (170 KB, 382x346)
170 KB
170 KB PNG
>no audiophile rocks
>>
>>100167434
The cable converts audio?
>>
>>100168019
It converts the digital signal to an analog output
>>
I don't need that
>>
>>100168019
>>100168405
Nah. it probably does nothing more than tells these selected phones to send the signal by analog
>>
>>100167434
>ugreen
Come on man, audiophilia is bullshit but don't go for the chinkest shit.
>>
>USB-C, in its general form, outputs digital audio instead. In such cases, the headphones or connected device needs to handle the conversion. That's why you find a chip inside some USB-C to 3.5 mm converters. But if the phone comes with a DAC for wired audio, the USB-C can offer converted analog audio output.


Now tell me why this $7.99 is not universal dac but works with selected phones only?
>>
>>100167434
Audiophiles dont play music from a fucking phone and then make it even worse by putting it through an $8 converter, you stupid fuck
>>
>>100170711
this. the cable needs to be at least $800 for it to have a real placebo effect
>>
>>100170812
this is not a cable it's an active chip
suffice to say it's shit, apple dongle is vastly superior and for $20 you get a dac that's transparent if implemented properly
>>100170499
its universal
>>100170711
doesnt matter
>>100170487
ugreen has decent cables but its not an audio brand
>>100170443
most probably
>>100170473
retard
>>100168019
yes
>>
>>100167434
I know it's a consequence of phones losing headphone jacks, but the abundance of decent quality, compact USB DACs as a result has been fantastic.
>>
>>100167434
I bet you don't even have directional ethernet cables.
>>
File: iwM0vZI.png (54 KB, 737x699)
54 KB
54 KB PNG
>>100167508
>no audiophile crystal therapy
ngmi
>>
>>100171203
uh... buh... what if I need to upload something?
>>
>>100171221
You can do it, but the quality on the receiving side will be worse.
>>
>>100171207
wtf is that?
>>
>>100171464
Misty's hands are growing because of the Crystal treatment for her illness in ICU.
>>
>>100171554
what is this crystal treatment though?
and why does she want her hands to grow?
>>
>>100171203
KEK
with audiophiles, nothing is real, everything is satire
>>
>>100171596
I don't think she wants it, it's just a side-effect of the treatment.
>>
audiophile reporting in.
none of us would be seen dead using a phone to play music thats a poorfag solution.
we use DEDICATED hardware that is designed SPECIFICALLY for music and NOTHING else.

a phone is a jack of all trades master of none device, you penny scraping peasants.
>>
>>100171946
I'm an audiophile, too. I use a phone and a $70 set of Bluetooth headphones where the pleather covering the foam cups is peeling off. Sounds fantastic.
>>
>>100171159
phones have even better DACs than that but youre not wrong
>>
>>100171946
All current dedicated hardware designed specifically for music are just phone guts.
>>
>>100172449
thats nice. if only you knew how the phone screen and battery affect audio quality you wouldnt make such ill informed posts.
>>
>>100172512
Also just phone parts in those devices that have internal batteries and/or screens.
>>
>>100167434
>no cable risers
>no harmonizing crystals
>no snake oil
Yes.
>>
>>100167434
Yeah, you need something to plug into the DAC
>>
>>100171934
but what is this crystal treatment?
is it just this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_healing
>>
>>100167434
there is no reason to use wired headphones anyway
>>
>>100172512
>>100172575
i am an audio genius
enlighten me or kys baiting faggot
>>
>>100173369
The companies are full of shit and there is a huge amount of shared component usage between common devices and audiophile devices and it doesn't matter.
>>
>>100167434
Idk, haven't measured it. For all I know it's decent assuming you don't need much of an amplifier. Of course, just because it accepts 24 bits doesn't mean it actually has a good signal/noise ratio.
>>
File: 1693397704747528.jpg (82 KB, 640x680)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
> audiophiles
>>
>>100173466
It's also digital audio rendering your avalanche of stupid shit irrelevant.
>>
>>100173633
What's important about the Ram is where you download it from.
>>
File: 1656446517261s.jpg (5 KB, 187x250)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>100173633
>ram impacts sound quality
i can't even
>>
>>100170711
>>100171159
>>100171946
The dongels work for PC you retards
>>
>>100173633
bruv wat
>>
File: 5s423z.png (237 KB, 623x478)
237 KB
237 KB PNG
>>100167434
Are the audiophiles on this board with us right now?
>>
Boomers still unironically use wired headphones? Lol sad ngl frfr



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.