>>100170054Because they're getting paid for it.
people are lazy.
>>100170054I want everyone in the world to be able to live like the people in my country where working is optional. Food, housing, healthcare, education are all free (to you)
>>100170054It is for the love of god and humanity that we labor for the commonwealth of man. That one day our species will be so wealthy that our descendance can jack into neruolink simulations of doing manual labor and drive truck and do these other things in a safe environment that the robotic caretakers obviate for them. Think of the future, where you can pretend to be a heavy equipment operator or work in a mine or do these other things all whilst being in an air-conditioned vat with endless pizza pockets on demand.
stupidy :^)
If AI ever replaces anyone it will be mathematicians, I mean, I solved all math homework using wolfram alpha (that was over a decade ago) and I don't care.
The idea that AI will take the jobs away from programmers stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of what programming is. Protip: it's not typing stuff into a computer
>>100170439the real problem with AI is that it doesn't exist, AI could think and therefore actually replace programmers
Because the pinnacle of programming is in optimizing the solutions to problems while maintaining a low amount of bugs. It doesn't need to be writing the same fucking thing of OOP and FP when developing, developers want to focus on making shit that doesn't bore them because it'll be the same thing they've done hundreds of times before.
>>100170054why not? isn't this what people do? finding out ways for shit to get done more efficiently so then can move onto other stuff?
>>100170054When the particular category of codemonkey that works on AI replaces itself we'll have officially hit singularity.
>>100170054long way away from AI making complex programs on its own. Right now picrel is the limit of AI.
>>100171531
